HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact_PZ-2022-00217 - WITHDRAWNPage 7 of 11 File: development standards variance handout 2022 Revised: 01/03/2022
FINDINGS OF FACT SHEET - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
(Petitioner fills out 1-3, and first 2 blanks)
Docket No.: _______________________________________________
Petitioner: _______________________________________________
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health , safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially
adverse manner because:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development Ordinance to the property will result in practical
difficulties in the use of the property because:
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________
DECISION
It is therefore the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No.
___________________________ is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are
incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this _______________ day of __________________________________, 20 _______.
_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
_____________________________________________ _____________________________________________
SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant.
*See attached
*See attached
*See attached
Chick-fil-A, Inc.
PZ-2022-00217
UDO Section 5.39.H.2.a
Variance request to allow a building sign facing east towards a private street (a non-fronting street).
Chick-fil-A is requesting a variance to allow a wall sign to be oriented east towards a private street
(Walnut Creek Drive). Chick-fil-A is an impulse driven quick service restaurant that relies of signage to
alert potential customers of their location. Signs are essential from multiple vantage points so that
motorists can identify their location. The subject property is an outlot in a shopping center where there
are multiple points of entry. Given that motorists will be traveling by the subject property from multiple
directions, Chick-fil-A believes that a wall sign facing east is warranted.
The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community because: the proposed variance would allow sufficient signage to be
installed on the building façade that fronts an adjacent roadway. Signage will be paramount for the
success of the restaurant. The proposed signage will help notify potential customers along the adjacent
roadway or within the shopping center of the restaurant’s location and it will give them plenty of time to
make safe maneuvers to enter the restaurant site.
The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in
a substantially adverse manner because: the Chick-fil-A property is located within a commercially
zoned area with similar uses. Chick-fil-A believes that the proposed signage is comparable to the
signage for the surrounding commercial buildings in the area.
The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development Ordinance to the property will result in
practical difficulties in the use of the property because: adequate signage will be paramount for the
success of the restaurant. Due to the subject property having multiple roadway frontages, the proposed
signage on the building will be essential for notifying motorists of the location.