The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPacket for HO 11-28-22 PROJECT Monsey Homes is designing a home to be built on Lot 6 Woodhall, 10381 Woodhall Lane, Carmel, IN 46032. We are requesting 3 variances. VARIANCES 1). We are requesting to change the minimum front yard set back from 30' to 25' as defined in UDO Section 2.04. 2). We are requesting to increase the encroachment of the window wells from 24" to 3' 8" into the 10' wide side yard as defined in UDO Section 5.79J. 3). We are requesting to increase the lot coverage from 35% to 52% as defined in UDO Section 2.04. STATEMENT OF SUPPPORT The variances we are requesting will have no negative impact on surrounding properties value and aesthetics. Originally, these lots were to be deeper. Behind all of the lots on the east side of the community is a 100' common space area. Lots 7 & 8 have been approved to allow for a 25' front yard setback. This will allow our home to be in alignment with the other two properties. We believe the 24" encroachment to be under sized for an emergency exit through a window well. Our request of 3' 8" will increase the interior dimension of the window well to 3'. The 3' is from the exterior façade of the house to the interior of the poured concrete window well. The additional 8" is the thickness of the poured concrete wall. I do not know if the 24"encroachment includes the thickness of the retaining material, in our case 8" of poured concrete. We would like to have 3' of clearance so a person in an emergency situation can more easily and quickly exit the basement through the window well. The CCR's do not allow for the garage doors to directly face Woodhall Lane. We have added a Porte Cochere and the rear side of another garage to screen the attached garage doors from Woodhall Lane. This design requires a larger driveway courtyard. The additional impervious driveway has increased our lot coverage from the allowed 35%to 52%. This additional lot coverage will not negatively impact the neighbors or the City of Carmel regarding drainage. There is plenty of green space around the house and the large 100' common area behind the house will allow for additional drainage. Thank you. r Engineer 10381 WOODHALI.. LN, CAR, 4603 X „, cji) ® 0 Show search results for 10381 ... GIS Vie 1 • 10381 WOODHALL LN Zoom to i r r -, -86.202 39.940 Degre ' ' k . -�., ,'ra Esri, HERE, Garmin, t _ e : . 1Y3*1 Sii� .wRir: ..a...:7 ..,,�c -:„,.; 4 1 x;KArt lAate "_122 t-.00 At t _ zee l!'''!'`I'-. `3.49 t2.036 000 p tl .. Arkir .',;,44.«4 #ere Legal Description:okott4sto PtG 5ertt«++?, $ ` r !7,Ratio 3 ,L4H Lot Lot Number: :: 400do tar Unit: Prgpirty t>stix:Roo-totttrac Pkraoti sss . a 1 t n.11..1 (..,,rua) c.i.ac —I IVH000iM 9 101 I- � r q $a l U i 1 ///// _ 1 A 7 'y -- 4�5 s �15�� n - '' ''' i M• i N �+i I11i, l l 1-i t ; t 0 A 5 ,A STOEPPELWERTH JOB ID 104728 w ALWAYS ON CONTROL# 104728 MONS ‘4.4 7965 East 106th Street,Fishers,IN 46038-2505 :a �� phone:317.849.5935 fax:317.8495942 10381 WOODHALL LANE CARMEL, IN 46032* \ CT FO CO\ ST UCTIO\ ''` LOT AREA:1729 Sq. Ft. P E V I T T I \ J P C S E S O\ LY I LOT COVERAGEm 7G I 52.2 I M.F.P.G.-867.8 I (PIN) AS SHOWN, THE PROPOSED HOUSE WILL FALL.OVER THE PLATTED 30' BUILDING SETBACK UNE AND WILL NOT MEET THE 30' NOTE: THIS PROPOSED HOUSE HAS LITTLE TO NO TOLERANCE RELATED TO SETBACK MINIMUM SIDE YARD AGGREGATE. FURTHERMORE, AS SHOWN, THE REQUIREMENTS. THE POURED FOUNDATION MUST BE PINNED BY STOEPPELWERTH t ASSOCLI YES HOUSE WILL EXCEED THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE OF 35%. THIS ' (SBA)PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND/OR CONSTRUCTION OF ANY CONCRETE OR FRAMED WALLS IN DRAWING SHALL BE USED AS AN EXHIBIT TO OBTAIN A VARIANCE ORDER TO ASSURE ITS PROPER LOCATION.5tA WILL ASSUME NO LL4BILTTY SHOULD THE BUILDER FOR ZONING COMPUANCE ONLY. THIS DRAWING IS NOT TO BE FAIL TO SCHEDULE SUCH A PINNING WITHIN OUR STANDARD AND AGREED UPON LEAD TIMES. USED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. PLAN WILL BE UPDATED AND RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION UPON VARIANCE APPROVAL COMMON AREA•C' 125.00 C s IMPERVIOUS AREAS •••-+••• ••• °•• ••• HOUSE/GARAGE: 5,669* Sq. Ft. (t-IT ------jyyy��- PORCH: 40* Sq. Ft. S.S.D.RISER F / S.S.O.RISER PRIVATE WALK: 110 t Sq. Ft. �.9q./" DRIVE TO RAY: 2,602 3 Sq. Ft s P: 9± Sq. Ft. _ 1 b'R.D.E. -M _ TOSTTAAL 6,430 t Sq. Ft u.oD' 15 19.00' $ GAR 1 20.99' GRASSYA 'a 4. BABAS n 2.0' . Q 3%3 da 43.00' I 15TOOP 1137 F ' A 50.0' J 20.00' GG \ O1 PROPOSED RESIDENCE qM.E. M1 00NC' F.F.ELEV.-869.e0 8 I M DRI�7 ��Ir.6esa.eo s s.o' / 8 2 TIE a 25.00' 8 GAR. g 18.0' 12.00'e 63 - N iO , r'1 30'ELL n 868. � _ MEI 25.00' „' '' n& 00 I 25 R.D.AU.E `• I. • 329'3 15' — 1'SW ''� CIE AR• 1 CONC. ; N ry n T.AS 9 LT9 MW111tN" I DRIVE • T.C.-868.91 CAAS BUILT Eua ell SSW 125.00 b + WOOD ; INGRESS/EGRESS,GRESS,REGULATED ON AREA"V IV T.CS-86 G3 \ N EE f„�ALL DRAINAGE,UTILITY,& A BU n SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT / o 67.69 LANE-E - A / �, w ` w � w w w \T, �_ \ .8.93 `1 ti / 3:1 I l / I \ ` j T AS BUILT \ ALL UNDERGROUND SEWERS AND LITOTES / SHOWN ARE PLOTTED BY SCALE FROM 'RECORD DRAWINGS'FURNISHED BY ENGINEER. \ T.C.-867.0J / „LVNIIIII,,,N,,,,,, BENCHMARK As BUILT / o` g(OEPpF'%, 03 TOP OF CASTING=867.03 y \_ ?¢; No. ?.` LEGENOi ' i 80040474 11_I. 11(10(1 PROPOSED GRADE PER PLAN ! ry, %.%AB AS BUILT GRADE A'A_7Iy COMMON AREA'0' IV STATE OF I I% CY PERPETUAL REGULATED S.SD. O�yf DRAIN EASEMENT '4<9�•:NLXA1dP;:yOQ.C� -————-SUB-SURFACE DRAIN `1,"KO SANITARY SEWER •`$ \ '''O SU R.\1 ,`` PSI. 6'AS BUILT SANITARY LATERAL �d \„ , 6'PROPOSED SANITARY LATERAL /� W STORM SEWER //1 , / / C' L�.111 4 JAR'WATERAI CONNECTION IL/�G•s�'•A"9!J-(l/J/ .'�'P�,nil�-� —w—WATER MAIN °4----SWALE NOTE:THIS DRAWING IS FEB PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY MID NOT •° SANITARY MANHOLE LOT 6 INTENDED TO BE REPRESENTED AS A RETRACEMENT SURVEY, ORIGINAL SURVEY.ROUTE SURVEY,LOT SURVEY OR A SURVEYOR LOCATION REPORT OR ANY OTHER TYPE Cr PROPERTY BOUNDARY STORM MANHOLE ASSESSMENT.NO BOUNDARY CORNERS HAVE BEEN SET AHD W00 D H A L L LANE DATA FOR CONSTRUCTION OF NEW IIEFORE NO UABIUTY WU BE MPRMOVEEEDMENN ORNCL USE FE OF ENCES. ■ CURB INLET INST. #2009001339 END REV Am 3'TO BOTH GARAGES V ORE HYDRANT P.C. #4, Slide #518 00/15/22 Hal 1 ZONING: S1 S/ / MK M DIM°a PAR° B..L. BUILDING LINE 10' MINIMUM SIDE YARD 07/27/22 CEJ M.E. MATCH LUSTING 20' MINIMUM AGGREGATE iv 1 REGULATED DRAINAGE EA R.D.&U.E. REGULATED DRAINAGE AND ENT 20' MINIMUM REAR YARD ' UM TY EASEMENT M.F.P.G. MNMUMFLOOR PROTECTOR 35% MAXIM UM LOT COVERAGE GRADE mUDIOw. Can baton TON d19. FINDINGS OF FACT SHEET-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-3 +first two blanks) Docket No.: f'"? ^c)0c 1,- O() ,D`IV Petitioner: 6 R C6? f ONE'1 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 1 C.- 1'S�tLE> N OF 1 HEN) '0-4E COnti1t) 10.Y, 1/IJ L �S DSO P LAZ6E t3J1ZFELOr Cocnrno sPAO (JDo`) wOuu -NL.50 `?k.K os 1_13 L.1tJ E W i<-1-( LcyTS 7 f- 8. '61.1".S S►�tx�t.' i-HVE 1)O tAl Ezsci E. t-FEc o 4-He ives61rtNbRS oR ev3LtC 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: C`l t)v6 „)C, i t +-IOOSL C c is i -f�-iE SCR DDES IQ as -HAvE N t\):tEi P►i1.vE .SMPP c- tALI. J1 't't 'A ACE.�S ?CV:PE-Lt. . -1 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: '1i~-lekE l v�Ll??C ND ?-LAC, USE O r '1)-/C IPZDS319, 1. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance'Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of , 20 HEARING OFFICER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. , FINDINGS OF FACT SHEET-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-3 +first two blanks) Docket No.: " 04Q _ noa oD y/ Petitioner: �2 LLB 0 Q5 -'f 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 1-1-)E ovv U.) l L 4 1 U 2ArJL L ttiCl O►��i o vS F(2,0(n 6R.A E uooe L V U Ct^C (o v a flO vv 1�1 t 1 0 H c •00-1 .. SlyO`uLD NAVc 1v 0 PNI N)ERS[ --C1 ErtLC--- 0 ►J n isILT64-tWkS 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not b affectefl in a substantially adverse manner because: 0��u 1 G" W.11\11 ,0vJ WELLS i,o tic' k RU E R V _T c AL, t�� s c 3Ov t 6 2,N Q c. L.i:EL,, }---r Arles N 1}iE 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: J-oQ LL. 2,6 N C \ THE. 13P\S r() VIA 1+1c wS,IJi .0 w l v ELL) a j ' (su ow CE v 6N. s ELy E r-rEc.51 �H C Ir3€:7 DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance'Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of , 20 HEARING OFFICER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. • FINDINGS OF FACT SHEET-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-3 +first two blanks) Docket No.: oZ Daa — d O V Petitioner: RE-6 f '.)O)SC Y 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: ERE Is 1PLEr ii y or OPEN L Wz, -rkE corninL?t.)_r- y. ECZ fs (\L,SO P L�AQCDE. �J1=rL=� D F CocnfnoN)spALE (/0 o QCt-i41v+� a�/u' iZ Lam. �1-r1�S .S f/�UL_t� �- c u 1Q0 f��Vt t G 1-~FL ' I HG. N l- �i;113Cb(),S (cG2 ?o?;3- C 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: Si-t.i L O E. F,- olr fAc G woo c -tAU- L r\ 1- A t � `f c-Ov VA( 1i,1�s cg �`A'��. 'I 1-ds rg ecQe huQ L� Q v uS [ovreci- c, S bbES IucY, MAvt M uvc 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: ik8Z.E k4\-1.."3 t N J ' i\CAT4-SAL, VL-- i '1-HE u. E (7 F P Z 'S`-L DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance 'Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this day of , 20 HEARING OFFICER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant.