Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTaffic Study_Supplemental_Aug. 1990 { L SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY FOR CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORP. A Proposed Expansion of Existing Campus and New Physical Education Complex in Carmel, Indiana Prepared for: r CARMEL CLAY SCHOOL CORPORATION By: PFLUM, KLAUSMEIER & GEHRUM CONSULTANTS Indianapolis, IN Cincinnati, OH Fort Wright, KY August, 1990 r i TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION • PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 - 2 INTRODUCTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF THIS REPORT 1 DESCRIPTION OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES 1 L Existing Roadway Descriptions 1 Existing Traffic Volumes 3 TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS 3 LITrip Generation 3 Parking Requirements 5 Access Demands 5 Trip Distribution 5 p, SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC IMPACT 7 1991-1992 School Year Conditions (Main Street) 7 Impacts on 136th Street 7 MAIN STREET AT 4th AVENUE 78 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 10 fF,,L_ 1.1] LIST OF FIGURES f ' I - 1. Schematic Drawing of Existing Lane Assignments on Main Street 2 li_ 2. Existing Traffic Volumes 4 3. Schematic Drawing of Proposed Lane Marking on Main Street 9 , .. L 1567/R-12/04 t 7,1 1 + EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1r 1 1 A traffic analysis was conducted to determine the impacts of expanding Carmel High . I School to accommodate 2600 students and 300 employees. This will be an increase gr- of 800 students and 75 employees over the current levels. The findings of this report are summarized as follows: 1. Due to the parking lot assignments and the driveway connection to 136th Street, 1 the high school generated traffic that is currently using Main Street will be reduced by approximately 15% during the 1991 - 1992 school year. 2. Students and employees will be assigned to parking lots in order to manage the rarrival and departure routes. 'r�Y 3. The existing parking lot in the southeast quadrant of Main Street and 4th Avenue will be expanded from 45 parking spaces to 450 parking spaces. The only ingress/egress point to this parking lot is to be relocated from Fourth Avenue to Main Street. Due to these measures taken by the School, the High School generated traffic volumes would be greatly reduced on 4th Avenue. i__ 4. A deceleration lane will be constructed by the school on Main Street to separate [ the right turning vehicles and the eastbound through vehicles as shown in the report. 5. Approximately 750 parking spaces will be located on the high school campus north of Main Street. : 6. A two lane road will be constructed to connect the campus with 136th Street. L c.„ 1 L L . , 1 7. Main Street will be remarked to provide better delineation between the through traffic and turning movements, as shown in the report. f ; 8. The use of traffic control personnel will continue to be used by the school at i the intersections of Main Street & 4th Avenue and Main Street & Lexington Avenue to direct pedestrian and vehicular traffic during peak AM and PM hours. These i 1 peak hours will coincide with the beginning and ending of the school days. f; 9. Students utilizing the enlarged parking lot in the southeast quadrant of Main Street and 4th Avenue will be directed to cross Main Street at the intersection ( of 4th Avenue under the supervision of the traffic control personnel. 10. An intersection improvement project should be actively pursued at Main Street and 4th Avenue. The project should include the realignment of the south approach, the widening of the west approach and the installation of a fully-actuated traffic signal with pedestrian push buttons. The Carmel Clay School District has designed the parking lot in the southeast quadrant such that it should not impede this r Li project. Federal funds may be available for such a project. ! ' i' L L I_ I - 2 I.._ 1567/C-14/70 r._. 1 0 , SUPPLEMENTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION INTRODUCTION This supplemental traffic impact analysis has been prepared at the request of the Carmel Clay School District. This analysis of the daily High School traffic supplements the previously submitted Traffic Impact Analysis which focused on the traffic associated with the proposed Physical Education Complex north of 136th Street and west of SR 431 (Keystone Avenue). DESCRIPTION OF THIS REPORT This report, coupled with the previous report, represents a total overview of traffic impacts due to the expansion of the high school campus and the construction of the Physical Education Complex. The expanded high school campus will accommodate approximately 2600 students and 300 employees, an increase of 800 students and 75 employees. The 2600 students is a revised number from the 3000 students which was ir included in the previous report. All calculations and expectations in this report are `-- based on 2600 students and 300 employees. The previous report is not dramatically affected by this change as it was primarily focused on the Physical Education Complex. DESCRIPTION OF TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES Existing Roadway Descriptions Main Street (131st Street) is an east/west roadway of various widths. It varies between a two-lane facility just west of 4th Avenue to a four-lane facility just west of Keystone Avenue. See Figure 1 for a schematic drawing of this section. Fourth Avenue is a two lane north/south roadway. At its intersection with Main Street, , the south approach is off set by approximately 40 feet to the west in relation to the north approach. Fourth Avenue provides access to a Grade School and athletic fields. A schematic drawing of the intersection of Main Street and 4th Avenue is given in Figure L1. 1 • KEYSTONE AVE. .12 AN LEXINGTON BLVD. DRIVE TO HIGH SCHOOL �4 4�� \ V V 14\1/4 f LIBRARY • t VC CARMEL HIGH SCHOOL I ' t` CHURCH I V c • FIGURE I / EXISTING PARKING SCHEMATIC DRAWING LOT OF EXISTING LAN E ASSIGNMENTS ON 4th AVE. ) C MAIN STREET (CARMEL) 4th AVE. Y � 1 2 • is • Existing Traffic Volumes r L Traffic volumes were recorded by this consultant in June 1990 at the intersection of L 136th Street and Keystone Avenue as well as in July 1990 at the intersection of Main Street and 4th Avenue. These traffic volumes were compared with traffic volumes supplied by the City of Carmel as recorded in February 1989. A 25% increase was found �-' between the 136th Street volumes between February 1989 and June 1990. tL The traffic volumes recorded by the City in February 1989 on Main Street included traffic generated by the High School. The July 1990 traffic volumes did not include the High School traffic. When High School traffic was added to the July 1990 traffic volumes, it then indicates a 25% increase between February 1989 and July 1990. This similarity of growth would indicate that the recent traffic counts are valid and are a solid base for the traffic analysis to be performed. Figure 2 shows a graphic description of the location of these count stations and volumes. r TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS Table 1 indicates that Carmel High School will be expanded from 1800 students and 225 employees to approximately 2600 students and 300 employees. f L Trip Generation The number of trips expected to be p p generated by the expanded facility was estimated based on the actual experience at the High School as described by its staff. This direct procedure resulted in traffic estimates higher than these obtained from the use of secondary reference sources. These higher traffic estimates are explained by the greater Li number of students with autos in Carmel than at high schools elsewhere. Table 1 indicates a continued reliance on school busses to transport about 1/3 of the students. There will also continue to be a portion of the students who are dropped off and picked up by parents. Some students from the nearby neighborhood walk to and from school. The remaining 1/2 of the students travel to and from school as either drivers or passengers at about 1.5 persons per car. r � 3 1 • 1361h ST. T " 0 a z y 'a ti Q N O MAIN ST. 1 © 0 24 HOUR COUNTS L OA - 2945 Vehicles total east and west (Feb. 1989) OB - 8409 Vehicles total east and west (Feb. 1989) O- 8575 Vehicles total east and west (Feb. 1989) O- 1841 Vehicles eastbound (June 1990) DE - 8562 Vehicles total east and west (July 1990) O- 3000 Vehicles total site generated traffic (current approx.) FIGURE 2 EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4 , These various modes of travel resulted in an estimate of about 1035 vehicles entering `" the campus each typical morning in the most recent school-year as shown by Table 1. However, only about 775 of the vehicles entered during the peak hour because of t class and activity schedules. At capacity, the comparable numbers will be about 1560 r total morning vehicle arrivals, 1175 of which will arrive during a peak hour. After school, departures of students and staff are spread throughout a longer time period Li due to extracurricular activities. As a result the afternoon peak hour traffic demands are less than in the morning as shown by Table 1. Parking Requirements - Parking spaces are required for students and employees who drive. Currently 857 parking spaces are provided on lots both north and south of Main Street as shown by Table 1. L The anticipated capacity of 2600 students and 300 employees will require 1200 parking 1 spaces as shown by Table 1. The parking requirement will be achieved by: expanding the existing parking lot south of Main Street from 45 spaces to 450 spaces; and rearranging on-campus spaces north of Main Street to accommodate 750 spaces. Access Demands L Table 1 illustrates that all of the 1035 trips that are now destined to the High School use Main Street. The proposed parking arrangement and on-site circulation system will be served by both Main Street and 136th Street. Students and employees will be assigned to designated i : parking lots by a permit system. As a result, access to and from the lots will be managed with the result that Main Street will not serve any additional High School traffic as shown by Table 1. k Trip Distribution Li School enrollment data was processed with the finding that High School students reside in equal numbers on either side of Keystone Avenue. Future enrollment is expected to have a similar distribution. Therefore, it has been assumed that High School traffic will be oriented to the east and west in equal numbers. i 5 L.' TABLE 1 DETERMINATION OF TRIP GENERATION AND PARKING REQUIREMENTS 1 j School Year 1989-90 1991-92 1993-94 Capacity tU' Total Students (estimate) 1800 1975 2150 2600 Total Employees (estimate) 225 255 285 300 E Modes of Travel Walk 100 100 100 100 Bus Passengers 600 650 700 800 Drop-off Pass. 200 250 300 350 Auto Passengers 300 325 350 450 , Auto Drivers 600 650 700 900 Total Students 1800 1975 2150 2G0U Employee Drivers 225 255 285 300 Total Inbound Trips (AM) Busses 10 10 10 10 Drop-off Passengers 200 250 300 350 M Auto Drivers 600 650 700 900 Employee Drivers 225 255 285 300 -= Total 1035 1165 1295 1560 AM Peak (lour ' ! Arrive 775 875 975 1175 Depart 200 250 300 350 Total 975 1125 1275 1525 f PM Peak flour Arrive 125 150 175 200 Depart 625 700 775 950 Total 750 850 950 1150 Total Parking Requirement Busses 10 10 10 10 Autos, Students G00 650 700 900 Autos, Employees 225 255 285 300 1 ; Total 835 915 995 1210 Location of Auto Parking ir_, North of Main 812 750 750 750 ti South of Main 45 450 450450 Total 817 1200 12U0 1200 Access Demands I Main Street Busses 10 5 5 5 Drop-off 200 200 225 250 Student Porkers 600 475 475 550 1 Employee Porkers 225 200 200 200 Total 1035 880 905 1005 136th Street l', Busses 0 5 5 5 Drop-off 0 50 75 100 Student Porkers 0 175 225 350 Employee Porkers 0 55 85 100 Total 0 285 390 555 I 6 ' 1567/R-12/05 I SITE GENERATED TRAFFIC IMPACT 1991 - 1992 School Year Conditions (Main Street) f.Y The Majority of vehicles entering or leaving the High School currently use Main Street. A few vehicles approach the campus from 2nd Street NE. For purposes of this report the 2nd Street volumes will be considered negligible. As shown earlier, the peak traffic flow generated by the High School occurs during the morning. Although the total volumes generated by the High School will be higher than the most recent school year, the construction of the connector road from the north end of the High School to 136th Street diverts vehicles off of Main Street. In the 1991 - 1992 school year it is estimated that there will be 155 fewer AM inbound vehicles • on Main Street due to this connector. Table 1 also shows that if the measures that the school will be taking to encourage the use of the 136th Street entrance, the access demand on Main Street will never be as high as it is currently today. Impacts on 136th Street A capacity analysis was performed for the new intersection of 136th Street and the proposed school drive. The findings are as follows: C 1991 - 1992 School Year 1. LOS A for westbound to southbound left turns • 2. LOS A for northbound to westbound left turns 3. LOS A for northbound to eastbound right turns. I Design Capacity School Year 1. LOS A for westbound to southbound left turns • 2. LOS C for northbound to westbound left turns Ll3. LOS A for northbound to eastbound right turns. This analysis was performed by incorporating the roadway improvement recommendations as follows: 7 Sr- t, 1. An eastbound to southbound right turn lane on 136th Street 2. An eastbound through lane on 136th Street 3. A westbound to southbound left turn lane on 136th Street 4. A westbound through lane on 136th Street 5. One northbound and one southbound lane on school drive 6. Unsignalized intersection. h ; MAIN STREET AT 4th AVENUE This intersection should be reconstructed to align the north and south legs which are offset by about forty feet. The 30' width of the west approach is insufficient for more than current marking of one through lane in each direction. 1 . Although no formal traffic signal warrant analysis has been performed for this report, there is a strong possibility to warrant the installation of a fully-actuated traffic signal based on the Minimum Pedestrian Volume Warrant and the School Crossing Warrant. o ng arrant An intersection improvement project should be p pursued to realign the south approach of 4th Avenue, to widen the west approach of Main Street, and to install a fully actuated traffic signal with pedestrian push buttons. The Carmel Clay School District has designed the expanded parking lot such that it should not impede an intersection improvement project of this nature. „ MAIN STREET As discussed earlier, Main Street is an east/west road of various widths. It is recommended that Main Street should be remarked as shown by the schematic drawing in Figure 3. This marking scheme would better delineate between the turning movements and the through movements. This work should be coordinated between the City of Carmel and the Carmel Clay School District. This work should be funded by the School District. A deceleration lane will also be required for eastbound vehicles turning into the parking q x lot south of Main Street. This lane is also shown in Figure 3. This work should be completed by the School District at the time of the expanding of the existing parking lot. 11 E- . 8 r . • • I •:—.•.• r•--7—• -,-,,-,••••. I . r-.-. .7.''. I . , , . 1 F.--- F771, n"7 r----7 r---- . , , 1,4 , 1 r.__: • 4 i . I :11 L._....4 I I Li ..-‘ -•1 • -f- I 0 I t..., 4—--L. i I f : \ __.,_ - 1 0 ) VI 1 1 1 1 , ": i i I E I I I C • —— N • 1 • i- I irj- 1 I 1 ?-7:"•'...) fI :' ,I i ••,.,- f. -•- I It 1.t , (7) i i e"1 - ---tl, rtc t- • , 11 --_ __.—_.___,- • . I ... :1. „. _ 7.j•,t r. I r. ,__,.., ,_....____.__, _„ i-•-•1). 7# :..• ,..'e'.• I ; I I ••• I •• 1 (1 I •••°-% 1 I •••,.. .. I .1•.f '•.i:i f. . I I • •• • t I I I. IrN• 1 i 1 • k,e71. I:•-r I L.:, 1..,:.....__-_,-------T-4 i 171 ‘ - •-,=- '1.) IL- - • . :I L:.• • \ \ inn] Lk LL-1--.- -7-74 -,'"ji-..".) • 1 • JZ:Z.7.2-7•77-,-- ,. I - -f•rA...,....=.) .........2.7?i; -- ..••••••• • •• r'..) I :;..1 • • •rri.I I 1 '.-TT-7=-4-:::—{-, i4.1-0:-..fz•-iersfn. i-iff.\.i---':\%-r:V.:7-4-17N-^_r`.-• • r• - •r- : 1 e ''' '- I I. .::C.:;'-'-\.1;;;c4-17 g'.-s--:-1‘-7-.), O'S-F";(.. .-'37.-7rsd-.7..'") / 1 , ,---% t:2.-• - , 1.:t 4--7-.%..• 7 ...iTIL... .r:jr`rtA4-,,,44. :•:!::.1!. (..`7.)-717"`"; ‘ .J :::::-71 LI'-- "•' k---"i.--7-:•.== —""C-C-S-C-K-VC-V-1 le' CEE::/--------7-9 , ..__. -.Ai- : Q.,"‘r 1 LA... ;•I.• d---`ns 1 ',---••• ' • ••-.?••••-,.1.4 . ..•,Of i rt'j:. --•-•.....1: ) I r--- ----, 1----- ., ..:11 i .... \ ...„.......,.,......_....., .......g: ,....._ 1. fq,..,. . ....,..,,, I.IBA AIV 1 ; -'; • ---„; f 1-: cv 4.,..i. 1-- • ..g..„,..,5 , , 1 -1-:-;,-, 1 ...‘ ..:.;_r : •• :1.).. . '• dliiir‘likb I I t •- — — -f-,ri li •:.,-1-7-• 1 ; ..•„.,,- • 1 ji j . ,...,„ . L. (......}(? 1 i 3 , FIGURE 3 •-, ii!Ci• , =-,- ....1 !,; . 1 .z c... Ei ...., ,_ ,:..,../...... SCHEMATIC DRAWING i •• , 3_ :k, / ! 1 •-•:..••• OF PROPOSED LANE MARKING , !i i • i r ! , -. *-f" ON MAIN STREET 7, !,' • •rT .1":---- -:4": -. 77,•-•'. (7".•, -,f The expanded parking lot in the southeast quadrant of Main street and 4th Avenue should • have one access point and it should be located on north end of the lot. It should be a 3 lane configuration (1 incoming, 1 left-turn outbound and 1 right-turn outbound). A capacity analysis was performed on this drive for the AM and PM peak hours for the school. All movements were found to have an excellent LOS except the outbound left-turn movement. This movement carried a LOS of C or D depending on the various parameters. The summaries of the capacity analysis are included in the technical appendix. �I The main drive for all vehicles (except busses) entering the High School from Main Street f 1 will be the drive that is opposite Lexington Boulevard. A capacity analysis was performed on this drive as well for the 1991 - 1992 school year and the capacity design year. It was found that movements onto Main Street from this drive and from Lexington Avenue would experience the longest delays. The turning movement from eastbound Main Street to the school drive was found to have a LOS D for 1991 - 1992 school year. It was expected to have a LOS E for the capacity design year. This can be compared to an expected LOS D at the current time for this movement. RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 1.� The following recommendations are made: 1. The 450 space parking lot in the southeast quadrant of Main street and 4th Avenue should have only one access point. This should be on Main Street and it should be 3 lanes wide (1 inbound, 2 outbound). This will reduce the number of high school C-- generated vehicles that will use 4th Avenue. 2. Students utilizing this 450 space parking lot should be directed to cross Main Street at the 4th Avenue intersection. 3. The school should utilize traffic control personnel at the intersections of Main street & 4th Avenue and Main Street & Lexington Avenue until they are proven [., to be no longer necessary. 4. The Carmel Clay School District will be responsible for constructing a deceleration lane for eastbound vehicles that are turning into the 450 space parking lot and the remarking of Main Street. .`. 10 . 5. Parking lots will be assigned to persons that are driving to school and active measures are to be pursued to effectively split the arrival routes between Main street and 136th Street. 6. An intersection improvement project should be actively pursued at the intersection of Main Street and 4th Avenue. This intersection improvement project should -; include the better alignment of 4th Avenue, the widening of Main Street, and the installation of a fully actuated traffic signal with pedestrian push buttons. With the implementation of these recommendations and those included in the previous report, it is anticipated that the expansion of the Carmel High School and the construction of the proposed Physical Education Complex will have a minimal impact on the surrounding transportation facilities in that area. Due to the measures taken by the School District, the daily anticipated volumes of High School generated traffic on Main Street should actually be lower than those volumes currently being experienced. E.1;1 L T L r. 11 1567/R-12/04 1-.71 TECHNICAL APPENDIX if! fT 1.1] i i MAIN STREET do 4th AVENUE TRAFFIC COUNTS (JULY 1990) i- Hour NB SB Total EB WB Total Beginning 4th Av. 4th Av. 4th Av. Main St. Main St. Main St. 1 c h� ' A.M. 12 5 3 8 27 22 49 1 0 1 1 14 13 27 { 2 1 2 3 14 7 21 3 0 0 0 7 4 11 4 1 2 3 9 12 21 5 2 3 5 28 63 91 r-', 6 11 13 24 89 182 281 r :; .- 7 12 37 49 151 384 535 8 7 35 42 164 256 420 9 14 32 46 179 241 420 10 14 31 45 211 273 484 r { 11 16 51 67 264 289 553 1. P.M. 12 14 51 55 277 277 554 1 14 46 60 264 277 541 2 15 40 55 233 265 498 3 15 57 72 290 274 564 4 10 31 41 329 309 638 5 22 61 83 524 358 882 6 16 42 58 344 241 585 7 25 55 80 280 240 520 fl 8 16 34 50 209 157 366 9 15 79 94 127 148 275 1.] 10 3 14 17 80 87 167 11 9 8 17 34 35 69 r 1567/R-12/06 � ` L1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* i � IDENTIFYING INFORMATION c� _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 LL PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . 1 ] � AREA POPULATION. 25000 -- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . Main Street [� ) . NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Dr. /Lexington Blvd. � � NAME OF THE ANALYST T. Ford � DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . 08-03-1990 � . . , � �1 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . 7: 00am - 8: 00am OTHER INFORMATION. . . .. . 1991 - 92 School Year .'' INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG � � MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST L� CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN | |� CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN . -- TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' V� --------------------------------------------------------- _______ ` -- | E8 WB NB SO / i_| ---- ---- ---- ---- | ' LEFT 225 5 10 5 THRU 166 535 10 0 _- RIGHT 5 431 30 15 l� [' NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE _____________________________________________________________________ il EB WB NB SB LANES 2 2 -- ' LANE USAGE LTR LTR ` ! ' | { / ^ . _ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 / _____________________________________________________________________ � ^- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ---------- ________________ _________________ ^- EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 23 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 Y ` E SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION / ` __________________________________________________________ _-____ - % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION / � AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES v , ___________ _____________ -------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 � ` WESTBOUND 2 0 0 _ NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTH8OUND 0 0 0 � CRITICAL GAPS \ ` ________________-____________________________________-_______________ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL � (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ _ , MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 50 4.50 0. 00 4. 50 SB 5. 50 5.50 0. 00 5. 50 ' MAJOR LEFTS ' L EB b.50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 WB 5. 50 5.50 0. 00 5. 50 � MINOR THROUGHS - NB 6. 50 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 SB 6. 50 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 � L� MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 ' SB 7. 00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Dr. /Lexington Blvd. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am !' OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year / ! / i - \ IL CAPAClTf AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 | ----------------------------------------------------------- - ! ` ||� POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ' ` RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY - ' | ! MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS .�� p M SH R SH &� MINOR STREET NB LEFT 10 109 45 > 45 > 35 > E THROUGH 10 133 56 > 116 56 > 66 46 >E E RIGHT 30 1000 1000 > 1000 > 970 > A / MINOR STREET ' SB LEFT 5 142 56 > 56 > 51 > E THROUGH 0 185 78 > 178 78 > 158 78 >D E \ 1 RIGHT 15 640 640 > 640 > 625 > A | ' MAJOR STREET �- EB LEFT 227 346 346 346 119 D ! ` W8 LEFT 5 920 920 920 915 A ^- / ` IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ` __ _______________________________ _______________________ _ ____ / NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street � NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Dr. /Lexington Blvd. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . 08-03- 1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year �N i | � ` '�. � ` { ' | / � ! - � |l� ' [` 1� |!� . � | ' | �| |l� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *** * | * **************************************************************** i ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION `^~ _________________________________________________________________--__ � AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 � PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . . . 1 S] AREA POPULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . , 25000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . School Dr. /Lexington Blvd. LNAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . T. Ford ' DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) . . . , 08-03-1990 . �[ TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . . . . . . . . . . . 7: 00am - 8: 00am `,- OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year � �� INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL � ___________________-_________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG | MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST /- CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN ! ' CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN [� ' | TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------------_---_____________ '-- EB WB NB 58 ____ LEFT 263 7 15 10 ! : ' THRU 189 593 15 0 ! RIGHT 7 488 40 20 � � NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE . �� _____________________________________________________________________ ! �l � EB WB NB SB . _______ _______ _______ _______ ' IL LANES 2 2 1 1 ' LANE USAGE LTR LTR i/ . / ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ' Page-2 ` _____________________________________________________________________ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS [ ------- ........-------- ---------------- ------------------ EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 Y SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N /. VEHICLE COMPOSITION _____________________________________________________________________ ' % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION ' / AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ___________ _____________ --------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 _ 1 �� WESTBOUND 2 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 � - SOUTHBOUND 0 0 0 <- CRITICAL GAPS __________________________________________________________ _____ _ TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL »' (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ MINOR RIGHTS | N8 5. 50 4. 50 0. 00 4. 50 � SB 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 / MAJOR LEFTS EB 5. 50 5.50 0. 00 5. 50 W8 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 r' MINOR THF OUG S ' NB 6. 50 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 S8 6. 50 6. 50 0. 00 6. 50 MINOR LEFTS N8 7.00 7.00 0. 00 7. 00 ' SD 7. 00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ! ' --------------------------------------------------------------------- � NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STAEET. . . , . . Main Street ! NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . School Dr. /Lexington Blvd. DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am 'OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year / /` r. „j CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE Page-3 L'i. POTEN- r'aCTLiAl_ f-LOW— 1'7:!`tl_ MOVEMENT SHARE!) RESERVE r' ATE C A P AC 1:TY CAF:::C T'1"Y CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c: (pcph) c (pcph) c: (pcph) c: == c -- v l_OS [.:.:c p M c:H R :3H C>'' MINOR STREET r„ NL: LEFT 15 00 12 > 12 > r • _ > F i ' THROUGH 15 103 15 > 30 15 :,. —40 0 .:>l: E RIGHT 40 1 000 1 000 > 1000)l 0 960 > A F. . MINOR c '1'l:?[:E"-:T SD LEFT 10 112 .l5 > 15 > 5 > E T THROUGH RIGHT r= i 147 590 "9fI ? . ? 1: ?M E E :59E1 > 578 > A MAJOR £a'T'R E:E'r , . E2 I-E_F...l.. .2434) :01 300 :300 3ii. E WI: I_.E:FT 7 094 E/94 5944l• 887 A r; IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street 7,:+ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Dr./Lexington Blvd. _,.. J C' 3 C l') �_,! DATE AND TIME ("F= THE ANALYSIS. . . , . c:r�.t--r;�.,,--1 �'�0 ;; 7: r_>Crarr: ... ;a: c'.ic':>ram OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year 1:1 0 [is. l''''' il i r ' . . . / L1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* LIDENTIFYING INFORMATION_____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 �� �� PEAK HOUR FACTOR �� AREA POPULATION 25000 �� _ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street � [ �� �_- STREET _- - - -- - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET 9"s Entrance NAME OF THE ANALYST . T. Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-03-1990 TIME PERIOD ANALY7FD 7: 00am - 8:00am �u OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year � � INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL � ________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION | MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ______________________________________________________________ EB WB NB SD LEFT 3 5 -- 100 |l� | THRU 166 535 -- O i ( RIGHT 5 2 -- 100 |' NUMBER OF LANES EB WO NB SB / i LANES 2 2 -- 1 f� -- ' !` � ( � ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ' Page-2 -----------------------------------------------------_-------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ---------------- _________________ ^- EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N `^ WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N |{ ^ NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - L_ SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ` VEHICLE COMPOSITION � ________-____________________________________________________________ ' | '- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION | AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES � ___________ __- _________ -------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 [ ' WESTBOUND 2 0 0 `- NORTHBOUND --- --- --- ! . ^- SOUTHBOUND 0 U 0 r' � CRITICAL GAPS L_ --------------------------------------------------------------------- ! � TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL | � `.' (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ______________ ________ ___________ ____________ . MINOR RIGHTS i 58 5. 50 5. 50 0 0O 115. 50 . . MAJOR LEFTS � ED 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 � _ MINOR LEFTS SD 7.00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --- -____---_--------- _-- ------ ---- _---- ___________________ � NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street . . . . . . ^~ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . Bus Entrance DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS. . . . . 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year - i L L� ' ' � CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ y� POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE ' RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY � MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS �L p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ___ ` |' MINOR STREET S8 LEFT 110 315 314 > 314 > 204 > C ' 454 > 234 >C � - RIGHT 110 822 822 > 822 > 712 > A MAJOR STREET . EB LEFT 3 601 601 601 597 A C� < � IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ^ _ _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street ' ! NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET Bus Entrance DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year ' ' � / | ` ' . �� ` ' . ' . ' ' � ' ~ L1985 HCM: UNSlGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ********************************************************************* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION L _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 � PEAK HOUR FACTOR . . . 1 k� |/ AREA POPULATION . . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . 25000 `- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . . . . Main Street ` NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . . . . Bus Entrance � NAME OF THE ANALYST. . . . . . . . T. Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) 08-03-1990 � TIME PERIOD ANALYZED . . 7:00am - 8: 0001 ` OTHER INFORMATION, . . . Capacity Dosign Year INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ F ! INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTH8OUND: STOP SIGN ` �! TRAFFIC VOLUMES _____________________________________________________________________ ' ! EB WB B ^ LEFT 6 5 -- 125 K] THRU 189 593 -- 0 RIGHT 5 4 -- 125 ' NUMBER OF LANES ________________________ ____________________________________________ EB WB NB SB ^+ LANES 2 2 -- 1 ^ .�T �� / ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ` ------------------------------------------------------ PERCENT' RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE ' T GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ` }� ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- , EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N rl ' ` WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 ` N ' -- ' NORTHBOUND ----- --- --- - | . � SOUTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N VEHICLE COMPOSITION |^ --------------------------------------------------------------------- �~ . % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES ------------- -------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 WESTBOUND 2 0 0 ' NORTHBOUND . � — SOUTHBOUND ` i CRITICAL GAPS -------------------------------- -------------------------------- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2> VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ___________ __ ________ ___________ ____________ ! MINOR RIGHTS ! , SB 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5^ 50 / ) � MAJOR LEFTS ' EB 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5, 50 ' i k � MINOR LEFTS - SB .7. 00 7 00 0 0O 7 00 . . . � IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _______________________________-____________________________________~ . NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street L_ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET Bus Entrance � DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am � OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year |- � . ' | � / � | ' • : CAPACITY AND LEVEL-..OF-SERVICE: Page-3 POTEN ACTUAL FLOW- T" [f"rl_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c: (pcph) c: (pcph) c -- c -- v L O S • 1'1 SI••1 R SH • i^; MINOR STREET SD LEFT 130 270 268 268 > 131 > D 401 :> 126 >D RIUHT 138 792 792 792 > 654 > A MAJOR STREET ED LEFT / 557 557 557 551 A rg { i I `A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . ... . . Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . Sus Entrance DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 7:00am -- 0: 00am OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year J F, [1: : [] • B r3 LIS Fry • y,• 1 I 1985 HCM: UNSIUNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ikm %:*iFit K**x**M•* ***Ki4***#Kx***ith*•K*iFit••KKif•#*i!if••KKit••KK•K *iE**firK k#iE*il•*•K**•K***# r :I ENT1I=YIN(, :INF'C)RMA1•':IC]I41 r,, Li AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. , F PEAK HOUR FACTOR. .. 1 L AREA POPULATION .. . . 25i 100 r NAME OF 1'•F•E EAST/WEST STREET NAME OF 'THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Drive ve NAME OF THE ANALYST ,. T. Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/cld/v,) 08-•0Z-90 rIME PERIOD ANALYZED. . . .. 7: 00a m - 8: 00am i r OTHER INFURMATIoki. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year I NTE RSECr]:ON TYPE FEND CUN'IROL i s . INTERSECTION 'TYPE: 1 - INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WE"iT L CONTROL. lYPE NORTHI:_OUND: STOP ST.ON 1 RAF=F IC VOLL11•'IE'S ED WD ND SD THRU 75' 110 0 - - R I Gil~IT 101 NUMUER OF LANES ED WI ND SD LANES 2 2 1 , r ; t_. ADJIJS'TME.N'T FACTORS f atge?--2 L PERCENT RIGHT" TURN CURB RADIUS (•F'L- ) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT 'TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EASTBOUND 0.. 00 90 20 NI f . WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N NOR"FHDOUND 0. 00 90 2'0 N t CL"UT.•IiE UUND ----- --- -_._ - VEHICLE COMPOSITION SU TRUCKS COMBINATION AND RV 'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES -- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 r WF SiiTIJOUND 2 0 0 NOR; I HBU!JNU 0 C. 0 --- SOUT HE+OUND --- _..... ___ CRITICAL OAF'S TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT 1)151 . FINAL (T,.;b l e 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL SAP MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. i0 :5. 70 0.00 5. 70 MAJOR LEFTS F i WU 5.60 5. 60 0. 00 5. 60 MINOR LEFTS ND ' . :30 7 0 0. 00 7. 30 IDC:NTIFYING INFORMATION !�J(-`1hIE:--UI- 1�F-II'..-_LEAi'i'/6Jk EAST/WEST ::•il"F7F�F�T'--------•-1�:��'f.t'1-::i'I:Y"�_F'wt..__._____.___._.__-•------_.____ NAME OF THE NORTH BOUT'f-I s.... EET. . . . School Drive IDAT'EE ANI) TIME OF THE ANAL..YS I S r-n0--03--90 ; 'T: 00am •••- 0 a 00am O".'HER INFORMATION. . . .. 1991 -- 92 School. Year L F ' CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE Page-3 , ' �. . POTEN- ACTUAL — FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE . RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY / MOVEMENT v (pcph) c L. (pcph> c (pcph) c <pcph> c = c - v LOS- SH R SH ` . _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ ____ . � 1 MINOR STREET -- � n N8 LEFT 10 516 475 > 475 > 465 > A > 682 > 657 >A L� RIGHT 15 960 960 > 960 > 945 > A ' ' MAJOR STREET . � .�� � WB LEFT 110 896 896 896 786 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -� ___________________________________________________________________ ' NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. 136th Street � NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Drive . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-90 ; 7: 0Oam - 8: 00am ' OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 - 92 School Year p� ' | i L� . ' [ ! [� ! ^- ` ^ ' ` ' � L� ..` ' - ' � ` I9El < HMI: uNsa:l:;r•!F-'L ZE:U INTERSECTIONS Pagei--I .1( 0. w. .yc. .>r.x.**1(*It K i?-***IQ•i'r•M*41.. :K 4(iiy..►*k,. .. .. ..K. .4KX .*. .>5.. .. .. .y.r.. ..1 •y.••k•**1...{.. .. .*. .****. *** :C DENT IF •Y:CNO INFORMA I ILi!'I AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR ST••REF.: T. . :35 PEAK HOUR F AC I OR .. . . . . I AREA POPULA1'•I ON 25 00 NAME OF THE EAST/WES1 STREET.. 1.=,6'th Street NAME OF 1•E•Eh NOF 1••H/SOU•'FH STREET School Drive NAME OF THE ANALYST T. Ford L1 DATE OF 1 HE ANALYSIS (mcn/dd/y;) 08--03-90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ,. . . .. . ., . . . . is 00 m - 1, 00 am OTHER INFORMATION. . . . capar_:i Ly levels in the -f c.clure I NT..ERSE'C'T I Oi l TYPE AND CONTROL. t .: INTERSECTION 1'•YP'E: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST • CONTROL TYPE NORTHDOUND: STOP SION TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED NB ND SD LEFT i i 1 0B 25 ._._ THi:U 102 Ic,o 0 ---- t RIL,HT 22'5 CL 40 -- r . NUMBER OF LANES l ELc WE ND SD LAI\IE::S 2 2 1 --- AI)JUSTMENI FACTORS Pac------------ ------------- PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (f t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE. ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR I'i:l'GHT TURNS LAS1 BU JNI) 0. 00 VO 20 N e . l` WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 "i_i N r_. NORTHBOUND 0. 00 V0 '''0 N SOUTHBOUPJI:) -.------ ---_• --- - VEHICLE COMF'OS:IT:lON % SU TRUCE . % COMBINATION t ANI) RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND C> 0 WESTBOUND 2 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 C> 0 SOUTI-.U:JOUND ••-•-_. -- -...._ ..._ - -- CRITICAL GAPS TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT LIST. FINAL ` ( 'Fab:l c• 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF' -- MINOR RIGHTS ND b. 70 5. 70 0. 00 5.70 L" MAJOR LEFTS tl. b0 0.00 5. 60 C MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 30 IDEN1"IFYINc; INFORMATION NAME or THE EAST/WEST STREET '1,:' 6th S L r oo'L- - NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET Sc_h>cool. Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 00-03-90 ; 7: 00 am - O:0O tsn OTHER INFORMATION. . . . capacity loveltt, i.r> the •future I , l ` I EL: CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE Page-3 • FLOW-- TIAL. MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY jar MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c:: (pcph) c (pcph) c == c — v Lop p l"1 SH R SH MINOR STREET ND LEFT 25 376 307 307 > > 514 449 >A RIGHT 40 89 890 890 > 050 > A MAJOR STREET WD LEFT 190 '750 750 750 560 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET :E36th Street 17 NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET School Drive DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 00-03-90 ; 7: O0 m — El: 00 m OTHER INFORMATION. . .. . capacity levels5 in the future • TA r t„; • • H�. ' t 7 1 f ' 198.5 HCN: UNS I GnIAL I Z EI) INTERSECTIONS Page-1 .k. .. .y{*:K•#• *. .**9C. .**•If****. .* .j.. .. .. .. .. .. ..:.. .. ..x.*****#.y.**.k.. ..x.. ..'r.. ..y.. .. .. .. .**. .*. .*. .. . ..k.**�..*. r- IDENTIFYING INFORMATION • LAVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ., . - 1 __ AREA POPULATION SOON:) NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . — parking lot L.l NAME OF THE ANALYST, .. T. Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS {mm/dd/yy) ( S-03--1990 ' rl TIME PERIOD ANALYZED 7: 00am - 5: 00arri OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991--92 School Year INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ,I INTERSECTION TYPE:: •T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES is — E:D WIc ND SO 225 113 THRU 166 4 r2 10 •--- iH RIGHT 225 431 2 __- NUMBER OF LANES 4 ED WD ND SD LANES 2 2 --... L I . . ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 f'ERCEENI RIGHT T TURN CURD RADIUS (f't) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS EAS'TDOUND- 0. t'_i i 90 20 N L., WES1-ROUND 0. 00 90 20 N NORTHE OUND 0. 00 90 20 Y LEiOUTHSOLIND ------ ------ ---- - i VEHICLECOMPOSITION SU 'r'RUCkS CCIM13I MAT I ON - AND-RV 'S u M-VEHICLES�- - X.-MOTORCYCLES L EASTE1OUND 2 I) 0 r. I WESTSOLJNE) '? 0 0 I'.IORTFIDOLJND 0 G 0 1 SOL.1THI1OUNI) -- - --- r. CRITICAL GAPS is •1ASULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIS•T'. FINAL d (Table 10--2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAF' MINOR RLGH1S ND Li. 50 .41.. . O 0. 00 4. 50 MAJOR LEFTS WF_t 5. 50 5.50 0. 00 5. 50 MINOR LEI-IS IBIS 7. 00 7. C'►C► 0. 00 7. 00 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION Li NAME OP THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH;SOUTH STREET parking I o t. DATE AND "r I MEE OF THE ANALYSISOE -0-Z--1 9 90 ; 7: U0am -- J 00arn LOTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991-92 School Ye.•aar- L s , LCAPACITY AND LEVEL.—OF—SERVICE Page-3 [] POTEN— ACTUAL FLOW— T I AL MOVEMENT SI-IAREL•) RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c =• c — v LOS L" SH R GH MINOR STREET 1. NEB LEFT 2 0 23 2 230 L (!1 RIGHT OHT 1000 1000 1000 996 A MAJOR STREET ND LEFT 114 708 708 708 594 A ! • IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street � NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET parking lot F, DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03--1 990 ; 7: 00 am — Es: 00am ED OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991--92 School Year L - 1 I 'r • lJ I J.1'AZ HCM: UNSISNALI"LEED IN1"ERSEC'T':IONS Page-1 k*•k F h#*14k•kk)EK IEW*k•li )6•Ik* If **1;•If***•P:it*•M:•1{k *•If•n******A***#***•k**A**k**•k•k*•If*** k IDENTIFYING INFORMATION E_, AVERAGE RUNNING SE'EELI., MAJOR S IREE I :_;c:) F'EAI:: HOUR FACTOR 1 AREA POPULATION ''5000 NAME OF THEE LAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET parking 1 o•l NAME OF •T•HE ANAL_YE.'T'. . .. . . .. 1". Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (rrlm/dd/yy) 00--03;-_1990 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED 7: 00am - S: C:)Gam OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Do_>i qn Year AM INTERSECTION 1TYPE AND CONTROL_ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-•INTERSECT•:I:ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: E:ASI / . LS1 CONTROL TYPE NORTHE+OUND: srop SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WD ND 513 L_LF r 113 5 _.__ 1'HRU 1.89 480 10 --- i T RIGHT 225 431 WUNDER OF LANES Eii:Ii; W Ifl ND SD l LANES 2 2 L | ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 ________________________________________________________________ _ PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS _______ __________ ________________ ________ �- EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ` WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N � NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 Y ' � . . SOUTHBOUND ----- --- --- - _ VEHICLE COMPOSITION ' / -- % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION [ AND RV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES | _- ----------- ------------- -------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 0 r' ' WESTBOUND 2 0 0 NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 �- SOUTHBOUND --- ~-- --- CRITICAL GAPS u ------ ----- - ------------------------ -- TABULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ` _ ______________ ________ ___________ MINOR RIGHTS � NB 5. 50 4. 50 0. 00 4. 50 MAJOR LEFTS � W8 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 ' |' MINOR LEFTS N8 7. 00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 ' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street |� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET parking lot DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 7: 00am - 8: 00am . OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year AM ' ` ~ ` / . . ` ' - \' � ' � 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SERVICE El 1='OTE•N ACTUAL 1'-l_C)W- I :CA1_ MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY E.} MOVEMENT v (pc:ph) c (pc.ph) c. (pcph) c (pr_pb) c == c - v LDS ;31••1 R 6F•I ------------ MINOR STREET NB LEFT 5 230 204 204 199 D RIGHT 5 1000 1000 1000 995 A MAJOR STREET lk LEFT i 1 I 690 690 690 ` 7 F A • J1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION lL�;.i •- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. . . . . . Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . . parking lot DATE AND TIME OF THE ANAE._YS I 9 OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity D_sict; a r-c : I: t " - :Wan • L i �. iu 1985 HCM: UNE3IONAL.IZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *•if*****•k***•1;****►fX.p..h.*IN•k:•K:**•K*:**•If•*.h.**14*****►h*****•h***#*#****It*#:***•!<**i!* IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEErI:), MAJOR STREET. . 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .. » . » 1 AREA POPULATION .. . . .. . 25000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAME OF li-IE NORTH/SOUTH sr'REET parking lot NAME OF THE:. ANALYST » » . , » » . . .. » » » T. Ford L DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mrn/cici/yyi . . . .. . . OO-03--1990 1 1ME PERIOD ANALYZED. . » , » a:00pm - 4: 00pm OTHER INFORMATION. . . . 1991 r72 School Year INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL. INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIF ECl ION: EAST/NEST CONTROL TYPE NOI•- THEOUND: STOP SIGN L . TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED ND ND SD LEFT 225 10 180 -•--- THE<U 319 301 10 RIGHT 10 431 90 _._. r" NUMBER OF LANES ED WD ND SD LANES 2 2 2 -•- 1, f ADJUSTMENT FACTORS F'age-2 PERCENT RIGHT TURN CURD RADIUS (•f-t) ACCELERATION LANE GRADE ANGLE FOR R:CGRT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS L EASTBOUND 0.0o 90 20 N WE :ifE0UIVI> 0, 00 9020 N L. NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 Y SDU"1"HJ3OUND ------- --- --- __ VEHICLE COMPOSITION "I. SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION [-_ AND RV 'S VEHICLES MOTORCYCLES EASTBOUND :? C) 0 Fri WESTBOUND 0 1) NORTHBOUND C> C> 0 L- • SOUTHBOUND ---•- _••_•-•- --- Es CRITICAL I,r I L"AL-GF-INS----•------------_.___.----•-------_______-_____.__.___--------------_____ , TABULARVALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL ( Table :1.0-2> VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP ----------- MINOR RIGHTS ND J. J.> 4. 50 0.00 0l1 4.50 MAJOR LEFTS 1 1. MINOR LEFTS NB 7. 00 7. u0 0. 00 7. 00 [-: IDENTIFYING INFORMATION , [1 NAME OF THE E:AS-F'/WEi "F' STREET Main Street NAME OF IHE NORTH/SOUTH SFREE:'r Fa lr1<in l lot. DATE_ AND 'TIME OF. -F•I'•'iE ANALYSIri 00-03;--I990 ; : ;: 00pm - �I•: UUpm 1 OTHER INFORMATION. . , . :E99:E-92 School. Year I 1 1 4. 1 Ta CAPACITY AND LEVEL—OF—SERVICE F''ag --3 ' • ACTUAL FLOW— I"I =iL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE_. RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY f. MOVEMENT v (pcph) c (pcph) c: (pcph) c: (pcph) c = c: — v LOS p N SH R SH rl MINOR STREET ND LEFT 1130 352? 349 349 169 D F.';i RIGHT 90 1000 1000 1000 910 A MAJOR STREET ELWki LEFT 10 764 764 764 754 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION • NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Si ree•t NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET. . . , parking lot DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS C�;t—c:>; - l�i'9c.> ; :;� Ci!Jprst �T: 11L:>I OTHER INFO! MATION. . . . :L9 i'1--92l School Yee�a.r • • I • l._ • • 47 • i 19B5 I-ICM: • UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 *•*******•k*************•1Q•***•li•ii•****•i****k*•le•*if•*#*** *is***M:***•Y.*it****#**•l!*•N IDENTIFYING INFORMATION (:AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET. .. . 0 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.. .. . . . . . . ., . . 1 AREA POPULATION 25000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAI"IE OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET parking .l o t- I, NAME OF THE ANALYST ., T. Ford DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (min/cici/yy) 00-0 ;•-1c,90 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED Uriprn - 4: 00pin Is OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design gn Year :INTERSECTION TYPE AND CON'•fROI_ INTERSECTION TYPE: f-INTERSECTIO N 'j MAJOR STREET UIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SION i , TRAFFIC VOLUMES ED WO ND SO LEFT 22'6 :10 1 GO ____ [ . THRU 363 3A 3 10 _- RIGHT 10 43 1 90 NUMBER OF LANES EIEt ND NB SD LANES 2 .. ,;,, _.__ | | ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Page-2 _____________________________________________________________________ ' ARCENT RIGHT TURN CURB RADIUS (ft) ACCELERATION LANE ' GRADE ANGLE FOR RIGHT TURNS FOR RIGHT TURNS ------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- �L- EASTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N ' ' WESTBOUND 0. 00 90 20 N | � _ NORTHBOUND 0. 00 90 20 Y - ' SOUTHBOUND ----- ---- VEHICLE COMPOSITION ' ________________________________________________________________ % SU TRUCKS % COMBINATION ' ^ ANDRV 'S VEHICLES % MOTORCYCLES |�- ----------- ------------- -------------- EASTBOUND 2 0 ` 0 | WESTBOUND 2 0 0 -� ' � . NORTHBOUND 0 0 0 SOUTHBOUND --- --- --- / | � CRITICAL GAPS _____________________________________ _______________- TA8ULAR VALUES ADJUSTED SIGHT DIST. FINAL (Table 10-2) VALUE ADJUSTMENT CRITICAL GAP -- ` -------------- ________ ----------- ' MINOR RIGHTS NB 5. 50 4. 50 0. 00 4. 50 MAJOR LEFTS WB 5. 50 5. 50 0. 00 5. 50 MINOR LEFTS � N8� 7. 00 7. 00 0. 00 7. 00 [� / IDENTIFYING INFORMATION | � i � NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET Main Street NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET parking lot i . DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS 08-03-1990 ; 3: 00pm - 4: 00pm ; OTHER INFORMATION. . . . Capacity Design Year 4� ' [�. �r (] / L� � \ ` '