HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes HO 11-28-22 Casey Schafer,Crossfields: I'm in favor. Our community voted on Mr. Frye's request for his garage,and it passed.It
came to light that the HOA Board President wrote a letter to our community and requested it to be denied. I'm upset by
this letter because she doesn't represent the entire Crossfield HOA.
Kari Arens,Crossfields,HOA President: I'm against.That letter was directed to the Board of Directors.4 out of 5 Board
of Directors agreed with the letter. When the vote was presented to the neighborhood,the two variances were not known,
or raised during the vote or after the vote. After the variances came to light,at least two members on the Board that voted
yes,would have voted no.
Brian Zirkelbach,Crossfields: I'm against. I'm concerned about the drainage in this area. This structure doesn't fit with
the scope of the neighborhood. The water flows towards my property and having a structure here will not help it.
Eric Tinsley,Crossfields: I'm in support but the size of this proposed garage does not fit the scope of the neighborhood or
normal limits that are allowed by Ordinance. The City has Ordinances to set boundaries.The proposed garage should be
entirely wrapped with brick.
Rade Lukic,Crossfields: The size of this proposal does not fit within our neighborhood. I have not seen any detached
garages in our neighborhood. I believe the garage should be attached to the home.
Rebuttal to Public Comments:Jim Frye
• We have an existing garage,but we need more storage space for my boat,jet-skis,cars,and storage for my
daughter who's in college.
• All the proper documents were submitted to the HOA.At the time of the HOA submission and vote,we did not
know variances were required by the City of Carmel for my garage proposal.
• I was then flagged for variances through the Cannel Building Department when I submitted my building permit.
• I did not intentionally mislead my community about the need for the variances.
• The new HOA president has given his support.We needed 33 votes from the HOA, and we received 35 votes.
Department Report: Mike Hollibaugh:
• Staff does not have any objections to these variance requests.
• This request is for a larger accessory building than usual,but this is being built on a larger than usual lot.
Board Comments: Leo Dierckman
• Do the exterior building materials for this proposal meet the City's standards?Mike Hollibaugh: We do not have
design standards for this type of proposal,but the garage will match the look of the existing home.
• I will approve this item,but the HOA can take this issue and decide what it wants to do moving forward.
Approved 1-0.
(V)McKenney Garage Size Variance.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval:
6. Docket No. PZ-2022-00231 V UDO Section 5.02(B)(3) The combined square footage of the
ground floor area of a garage and/or accessory building shall not exceed 75% of the ground floor area of the
principal building,85% requested. The site is located at 4814 Briarwood Trl. (Briarwood Subdivision Lot 6). It is
zoned S1/Residence. Filed by Jeff Rothbard of SilverCreek Construction,applicant,on behalf of Joshua&Justine
McKenney,owners.
Petitioner: Jeff Rothbard:
• I have no additional information to include to what was already provided in my info packet.
Public Comments: None
Department Report: Mike Hollibaugh:
2
BZA Hearing Officer Minutes 11-28-22
• Staff recommends positive consideration,but there's one outstanding issue regarding the Engineering Dept.
review comments on constructing or contributing funds for a future sidewalk.
I Board Comments: Leo Dierckman
• I have read the Petitioner's info packet and Staff's Department Report.I will approve this item conditioned upon
the Petitioner will commit to contribute funds or construct a future sidewalk along the street frontage.
Approved 1-0,with coming to an agreement with the Carmel Engineering Dept.about the sidewalk requirement
(such as the homeowner will pay for(or install)sidewalk along their street frontage if/when the City ever installs
sidewalks in the neighborhood),and relocating the storm water line to the satisfaction of the Carmel Engineering
Dept.
(V)Panda Residence,Lot Cover Variance.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval for a pool&hardscape:
7. Docket No. PZ-2022-00232 V Silvara PUD Ordinance Z-652-20 Section 6.1 - Maximum 35% lot cover
allowed,52% requested. The site is located at 521 Mendenhall Dr. (Jackson's Grant on Williams Creek
Subdivision Lot 308). The site is zoned Silvara PUD/Planned Unit Development and is partially in the SFHA/Special
Flood Hazard Area.Filed by Sammi Schutt of PJE Lawn Care&Landscaping LLC,on behalf of Nikhil&Megha
Panda,owners.
Petitioner: Phil Ennis,Owner of PJE Lawn Care&Landscaping,LLC:
• We have met all the requirements of the HOA,but we have not yet received their letter of support.
Public Comments: None
Department Report: Mike Hollibaugh:
I • Staff recommends approval condition upon the Petitioner receiving HOA approval
Board Comments: Leo
• I will approve this item subject to the HOA approval letter
Approved 1-0,conditioned upon the Petitioner provide a copy of the approval letter from the HOA.
(SE)Elliott Short Term Residential Rental
The applicant seeks the following special exception approval:
8. Docket No. PZ-2022-00213 SE UDO Section 2.05 Residential Special Exception.
The site is located at 10828 Timber Ln. (Jordan Woods Subdivision Lot 95).It is zoned S2/Residence.Filed by
Thomas&Karyn Elliott,owners.
Petitioner: Kristine Griffiths:
• I am representing Thomas&Karyn Elliot,who couldn't be attendance because of a family emergency
• I will be taking care of the home and guests while the Elliot's are in Florida taking care of Karyn's mother
• I have experience with Airbnb,and I own a STRR in Michigan
• The Petitioners have been in contact with the City Engineering in discussions about the sidewalk requirement
along their street frontage. They were told that a sidewalk cannot be constructed in this area at this time.
Public Comments:
Wendy Willis,Jordan Woods: I live across the street. I support this. Tom&Karyn have been very responsible neighbors.
II don't see any problems in allowing them to run a STRR with the help of Kristine while they are away in Florida.
Jeanne Singleton,Jordan Woods: I'm against it. There's lots of children that live in our area,and the bus stop is next to
their house.I don't think this is an appropriate place to host a STRR because of all the children in the area.
3
BZA Hearing Officer Minutes 11-28-22