HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
05/10/2002 17:06
317-7~6f~101 HAMILTON 00 USD~
~. 'W
ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR ERO 10 AND SEDIMENT CO
Hamilton County SOU and ate CODServation District
1108 South 9t11 Street, obI svUle, IN 46060
Telephone: 317-773-21 1 F : 317-776-1101
"g~,
PNJed Name:
Pracot at Site: John Soutb, Hamilton Co. SWCD,
This report W8I Provided To;
1r'T
,tlkS.PAGE(;;:;c 87/08
\-~l-LG~)Z!?~"
L ~
RECEIVED
M~Y 13 2002
DOCS
l'
Date: $-/0.0 'r-.
The Following Items Have Been Eval ted
S ... Satisfa*ry M... Marginal U'" Un . .
Type OP BY ALUAllON:
o Initial II RoutID. 0 FOUOW-Up 0 Complain
This evaluation is intenc1ed to assellJ the level of "omplian" with
additional measures may be l'equired to control erosion ancl sedim
evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with stru
15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intenc1ed to identify. areas where
. All practices recommended in this report should be ,
ctioes designed by a qualified engineer.
AU .roslon and sedbDeut COntrol naeasur. shall meet the dill crlt ria, standards, aDd specifications outllllecllD the
"Indiana Handbook tor Erosion Control In DeVeloplng.Areas" r 51
CUrrent Site IDformation:
~
d Asaigned a Designation of:
dory NA ... Not Applica.ble
, CODstractio~te ManagelDent for Erosioll aad Sediment Con 01
S M ~ NA (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately ~
sediment control measures.
, S M CiD NA (1) Appropriate perimeter sediment con 1 me
(V M U NA (3) Conveyance channels have been stab' ed
@ M U NA (4) Erosicm. & sediment control measures .
CD M U NA (5) Stoxm c;JrJUn inle13 have been llc!eqwm=
a:> M U NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilize .
S (Q) U NA (7) Existing erosion & sediment control
c:P U U NA (8) Public" private l'Oaclways are being
S M U ~ (~) Brosion & sediment control measures
through seeding or other appropriate erosion and
es have been implemented.
protected with ~p1opriate sed.iinent."ontrol measures.
taIled properly.
s are being maiD1ained.
t "I 1If of lICCUO'lulltted sediment or tracked soil.
ve eon installed and maintained on individual building sites.
Statal of Sediment Retention On...site
~ Site conditions present a high potential for off.site sedim
o There is evidence of oft' site sedimentation. .
o Description provided:
t Plealle Refer to the ComBlents SectloD of ibis Report
Compiled By: Definitions
Satisfactory: The Item III curreatly .. &:olDpllanc:e with the ule
Marginali A concern ha. been Identified; corrective ac:ti Is . ongly recommended to remaID in compliance
U.,..tlsfadory; A violation bas beellldentifted and the site Is t iu ropliance; corrective adiOD Is required
Not AppliQblei Does not apply at this nage of eonstrudlon ~ U'll
,- ~ -.
85/18/2882 17:86
HAMILTON CO USDA
317-776-1101
PAGE 0S/8S
The
o
~ U ~~
..... '-- .fir""
~ ! '~~"
~. y
y,:
I~ RECENEO '
ON-SITE EVA. T .T I A'T'ION FOR ERQ 10" AND SEDIMENT CONTRtb~ M~~ 13 2002 .
COMN ENT ~ DOCS /
.- ~ /",.
JECT NAME: L 6.....S ~ I" Ii' 5 /i~17- .~
items ~he~kec1 below must be corrected prior to 6/..t. ........~..;)
. u~less otherwise noted.
Install an appropriate sediment eonttol practice between cons 'Uotic ~ aroas and lower lying aroas.
ReplacelRepair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 I .)an $tIlke straw bales.
Remove .accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasin Ob hind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet
protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with w tor)
Temporary seed, fertilize, andlormulch: ALL. ~III. . IF L~.J $,n!!,
nr"'
--
Permanent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are a!.finlll
gride:
Protect storm drain inletS: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inlets
Reshape and stabitize sideslopes of: 0 sediment U'apslbaslns ode entian/retention basins
b:iStalllMaintaln construction entrance(s):
Reshape lInQ liblbjli,ze co~veyance channels:
Place greater emphasis on erosion and S~lmcnt control on b ildin sites; contraotors. subcontractors, material vendors, and
oth8FS should be made aware of erosion and sediment contro requ ements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. slIt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be uti lzedc XI all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) at the end of each work d W,
Other Requiremtmts:
question$ regarding thb report contact: John ~out b
'\
~;.~\
~~
iT=--:,1
!':y;;
j'
PRO
o
o
o
lit
V
o
o
o
o
o
o
For
1-
.-
,12/17/2881 14:12 317-776~1 HAM~LTON CO USDA ~ PAGE 81
ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL '/>, .
Damnton County SoD and Water Conservation Dbtri~:< -'2>\
1108 South 9th Street, NoblesvWe, IN 46060 ~i'\:': . .."", <?\
Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101 :.:1 /J[~I:.;FI/ltf) \1
~-~ 1 2:7(11 i:J!l)
Do /JUl !:-.-j
Date: ,'-/1.01
Project Namf:: I.. 0
, ThiS report was Ptovldld To:
A
.. >>r
, Prdent at Site: John South, HamUtou Co. SWCD,
", ~
, Type OF BV ALUATION:
, 0 :. Initial '0 Routine, ,1I!r FoUow-up 0 ComplaiDt
this ~ation is'~ tc) IiSSess the level of compliance wid1327 lAC 15-5 (kule 5). It is also intended to identify ~ where
additional measurei may. 'be ~ire4 to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be
evaluated as to their felSl'bility by a qualified Individual with structuJ:8l practice.s designed by a qualified engineer.
All erosion and sediment eOltttOllnCllIlUl'Clllhall died the design criteria, stallda..dl~ and speeiDcatlolJs outlined ill the
"Indiana Handbook for Erosion 'eontrol iA DevelopinK Areas" or similar guidance documents.
.CUrrentsite Information.! - S.~ I~ ..o,..1c IA ~.,.Jr aJ'*f I Co ie. .
, A DoITIOIII,,'" b.Al)~": IIIJI...&.. .e-AUIC-' ,4001 r/iWAJ.. f"ILI.
'+ ty&TUN~ ft(TlfIJ'7"./bAI.
The FdIlowing Items Have Been E-valuated and AlsigDed a Designation of:
S ... Satisfactory M"" Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA III Not Applicable
CODJtru~on Slte-Malljge.aeat for Erosion and Sediment Control ,
S f:9 U NA (1) Disturbed areas bave been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion,and
sediment control measures.
S e U NA (2) Appropriate,perimeter sediment control measutCB have been implemented.
'I M U NA (3) Conv~ance chaunels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment,control measures;
, M U NA '(4) Erosion &. sediment control measures are installed properly.
M U NA (5) storm drain inlets have been adequately protected.
S M U NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized. _
~ M ,U NA (7) EXisting erosion & sediment eontrol measures are being maintained.
Q:) M 'tr ~ (8) PUblic & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment Or tracked soil. _
S M U ~ (9) Erosion & sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites.
Status of Sediment ReteDtlOft OD-Site
o Site conditions present a hiP potential for off-site sedimentation.
o There is e'\ridence or off site sedimentation.
o _ Description proVided:
'Please aeter to tile Comments S~on of this Report
Compiled By: Dethlitions '
Sitiafac~ory: The item i. c:urrent!y in compliance Witb tbe rule
l\farglnal: A concern bas been identified; ~orreetive actton Is strongly recom.mended to remain I.. compHance
UDlI8tistaetory: A vlolatlo. bas been IdeDtlfied aDd the site is not In compliance; corrective actioD Is reqnlred
Not,A.ppUcab.e: Does Dot apply at this stage of coDStnlctlOD R.ev1.riNl4/98
12/17/2001 14:12
317-776001
HAMIL TON CO USDA U
PAGE 02
'"
'.
-~-.' . :~--'----'i---~.....-
/---\ ',( I I ""~
ON-SITE EYALU~ TION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMlNT C~{~Qi {. (<<:i-\
COMMENTS '...Jr;1; RECEIVED \::\
-:/ DEe 17 2nO'1 IIE:\
r~i li ( I
, ':::\ DOCS' /~7
The items c:~ec:ked below must be corrected prior to , unless otherw ~~oted.' /2.71
o Install at!. apPfOprlate sediment control ~ractlce between construction areas and lower lying '"".~~ ,,r(,y
"- / /":::--' ~ W
"- / eJ.J'r-o . ;/ .
'-. ~~
PROJECT NAME:
o Replacc/R.cpair silt fen" an-d/or straw balr: bamers.
o Entrench slit fenoe (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales.
o Remove ,accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around stOrm drain inlet
protection devices; 0 streets and gutters (DO not flush with water)
vi" Tempprary leed, fertilize, and40r ~u~: T44 S6U Ut. ~."'JI.H.~ Ih f:
. , f~ 1,( mM S;41.I'ILV . - - -
o Pennan-ent seed, tortillze, and mulch ll(e" that are at final
grade: '
n..;.,iJ S~,
o lTc!ltect ttOllQ clraiD inlets: 0 curb inlet!l, 0 drop Inlets_
o Iteshape aBd stabiliZe shies lopes of: 0 sediment trapslbuin$, 0 detention/retention basin~
o InstalllMaintain collStruction eIltrBncc(s):
0' Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
o Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on buildina sites; contractors, subcontnlctors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimetel:' sediment contro'ls
(e.g. silt fenea) and stable construction entrllDCes shall be utilized on aU sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not tlU$h with water) at the end of each work day.
o Other Requirements:
"
J'
For qUesti~DS regard.log this report contact:'
John South
11/15/2001 09:51
PAGE 01/02
\'~J;E)
, ON-SITE EV ALUAll0N FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
HamlltoD County SoU and Water Cowervatiol1 District
1108 South 9tb Sb'eet, Noblesvine~ IN 46060
Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101
317-776-'- --€l1
U
HAMILTON co USDA ~
.;;...
Project Name:
t.""
Datel
NtJiJ. ,'/l-.. ~~(
.
l'resent at Site: John SQutb. BamBton Co. SWCD,
TIlls report was Provided To:
, , . .
S
&.
Type OF EVALUATION:
o Initial 0 ,Routine II Followwup 0 ComplaJDt
This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 IAC IS-S (Rnle S). It is also intended to Identify areas where
additional measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be
evaluated as to their feasibility ,by a qualified. individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer.
All erosion and .ediment eoDtrol measures shaD meet the design criterla, standll"', lIIId 'peclfleatloDl outlined ia the
=:=:~~K~iiri~~d_-~
. W,-.- :.:; .!: .~~~ - tr:/ .:'(/~ 'tf.lI,tn'iul-
The Followlpg Items Rave Been Evaluated llIld AN_eel a Designation of:
S = SatOradory M'" Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA"" Not Applicable
Construction Sitl; Management for Erosion aDd Sedimeat Control
S <a;> U m (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other IIJ'Pl'Opriate erosion and
sediment c:ontrol measures.
S at) l1 NA (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control mellJ\U'eS have been implemented.
S ,(E) U NA (3) Conveyance channeb have been stabili.zed or protec:ted widl apptoprlate sediment c;ontfo) measure",
S M c1:D NA (4) Brosion"& sediment control meuuteS are installed properly, - "~.6c/es
S> M U NA (5) Storm drain inlets have been adequatel)' protected. /
S M (j) NA (6) Outlets bave been adequlltely stabilized. . It,,!'. If'~/..~ .1. /,,-. ,144,1;./> ,.tllf.6
<!> MM U NA (7) Exist1D8 erosion &. sediment control measures are 'being maintained.
c::x:> U NA (8) Public Ii priv'ate roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soU.
S M U ~ (9) Erosion &: sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites',
Status of Sediment Retention OD-Slte
o Site conditions present a bigh potential for off-site sedimentation.
o There is evidence of off site sedim~tati011.
o Desaiption provided:
~ Please Refer to the Comments Section of this R.eport
Compiled By: Definitions
Satilfadory: The Item Is currently Iu compllanee with tJt.e rule
Margioal: A eoncern bas been Identified; corrective actloD Is .tron&ly recommended to reolaln In eompUance
UnsatiSf.ctoryl A vlolatioa bas been Identified and tbe site .. Dot fa compliance; corrective .ctio.. is reqalred
,Not Applicable~ Does Dot apply at this stage of construction Rnlml ~ 198
_ __n _I
11/15/2001 09:51
317-776-" ",Ell
U
HAMILTON CO USDA U
PAGE 02/02
,<
0<
QN.SITE EVALUATION fOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
coMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: It>t.u~~ sl"ic (7i) ,"II.."'" S{
The items cbeel(ed below must be ~orreeted prior to PAS l' Due::. . unless otherwise noted.
o Install an appropriate sediment control pnlcdce between constructioJl 8l'eas and lower lying areas.
o Ropl"~epalr silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
o Entrench silt fence (6-8 In.) and/or straw bale barriers (4"{) in.) and stake straw bales.
o Remove .a4:cumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbaslns. 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet
protection devices, 0 streets and g~tters (Do not flush with water)
o Ttmporary seed, fertil~. and/or mulch:
o Pennanent seed. fertilize. and mulc::h areas that are at firtal
grade:
o Protect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets. 0 drop Inlets
o Reshape me! stmilizc sides lopes of: 0 sediment tnlpslbasfns, 0 detentionlremntion basins
T
o Xnllt&lllMaln1lin COnstroGltiOD entraDee(s):
o Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
o Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; COIJt{aetors. subcont{actors. material vendors. and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requimnents. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (<10 not flush with water) at the end ofeach work day.
o Other Requ~ents: '
I. f;;'I~I,' seJirJ 'ti'~ tile" ~,klllfel IIH. ,1/,"( ic) ~f- U/e # l ~ C" 'fII'Ie.. ~~ :
.' .
oZ. .:Ls.~J'I.df;-~bc!e.s ~... J~A.~j~. S~e 'G~J,
~. ~ :~"t1jf"f:' ~~- c._~#. ~ I'/~~ ~/- cofM
4,.:z;.sfJl' 6.'{t t:_c "'-1 ~ ~ 1'IMl.l. ,f, ,,~'" &HP eN~'e..
~ E: ~e-J. 5WA.(~ dr4.,'M.:'^j c~l. db ~'4d,
,. $c.J d~"~ swJe... tl~1 d,'1tw/,c1i "'~4. ./;,." u'JI ,<~~ .{' ,,,J;.l4It 'D.t i?J'
s..... ~!I oluRJ.'kle.
I
For questtoJls regarding this report contact;
John South
~__~H_____~_I
..
DNR
u
o
Frank O'Bannon, Governor
Larry D. Macklin, Director
Kite Development
Mr. Tony Hibbert
6610 Shadeland Avenue
Indianapolis, IN 46220
'i3
VIA CERTIFIED MAIL # 7000 0600 0024 8131 5966
Division of Soil Conservation
402 W. Washington Street \/\/265
Indianapolis, IN 46204-2739
PH: 317/233-3870
FAX: 317/233-3882
Indiana. Department of Natural Resourc
October 18, 2001
RE: Lowe's at 146th and SR 43lin Hamilton County, Indiana
WARNING OF NONCOMPLIANCE
Dear Mr. Hibbert:
This office has been notified by John B. South, Conservation Engineer for the Hamilton County Soil and
Water Conservation District that your project known as Lowe's at 146th and SR431 is out of compliance
with the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit Rule 327 lAC 15-5.
It is the intent of the Division to resolve non-compliance issues and avoid referring this project to the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) for an enforcement action.
The On-Site Evaluations for this project document that an inadequate effort has been made to comply with
the conditions and requirements of327 lAC 15-5. Copies of the most recent reports have been enclosed.
The reports clearly outline the deficiencies observed at the site and the requirements to bring the project back
into compliance.
Failure to implement and maintain appropriate erosion and sediment control measures is a serious violation
and deserves your immediate attention. It is therefore requested that on or before October 26, 2001 that
you adequately address the deficiencies as specified in the enclosed on-site evaluation.
Once corrective action has been taken to address the deficiencies, please notify John B. South, Conservation
Engineer.
Staffwill continue to inspect this site to monitor progress and assess compliance with the Rule.
Failure to correct deficiencies will result in a referral to the Indiana Department of Environmental
Management and the initiation of an enforcement action.
If you have any questions regarding the On-site Evaluation or require clarification on any issue, please
contact John B. South immediately at 317-773-1406.
Sincere~
Randy J. Braun, CPES~ .
Chief, Stormwater and Sediment Control Program
Enclosures: On-site Evaluation Reports
cc:
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District (Project File)
Jon Dobosiewicz, Carmel Department of Community Services
Kenton Ward, Hamilton County Surveyor
Doug Wolf, Stormwater Specialist
An Equal Opportunity Employer
Printed on Recycled Paper
..,}~r.t.-..
..
ON-SITE EV AL~f .rION FOR EROSION AND SEDXOT CONTROL
HamUtolP(:ounty SoU and Water Conservatio triet
1108 South 9tb Street, Noblesville, IN 46060
Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101
Date: ()G-ro8EJ!. lZ , ZCOI
.
Project Name: L ouJ4f'S (1) II/I.'" 5.,.~l!sr
Present at Site: John South, Hamilton Co. SWCD,
~
Type OF EVALUATION:
o Initial 0 Routine III Follow-uP 0 Complaint
This evaluation is intended to as,ess the l.v.1 of compli.... with 327 lAC 15.5 (Rid. 5). It is also intended to idcnlify ..... wh.r.
additloncl m.asures may be rcqoh'cd to control erosion and sedimenllllion. All practices recommended in this report ,hould b.
.valuated as to th.ir feasibility by a qualified individucl with structUIcl practices designed by a qualified engin.er.
This report was Provided To:
AII.raslon and ,.dlm.nt cootrol measur.. -,ball' meet the design crlt.rio, standards, and 'pccincation, <>Ddined in the
"Indiana Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents.
Current Site Information: ~ Er; j~O 6F ~~D 1:14 $ ~el'!..J.I F / l,.l. f!b . '/~L I'D It.
, nDf05~Jl JlAH~.5 eL4GBD. "
'. 'r6HS D '2~t.JIOO':> P~PIE!Y 'JI.~ M27' (~It~LeTZi'. -~
S /7"J!! /.5 I;U~C()/fIfE~t>ED pcg A r.JAeJlIJ/(, OF }lcu.(CIfPJ,I4N
The Followingltems Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of:
S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable
Constructiog.S.i,te Management for Erosion and Sediment Control .
S M Uid NA (1) Disturbed..... bav. been ad.quately protcclCd tIuoug!> ,ceding or other appropriate erosion and
sediment control measures.
S M @ NA (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented. .
S M W NA (3) Conveyance cbanneis bav. been stabi1izcd or protected with appropriate sediment control m.asur.'.
S t1J) U NA (4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly. .
S "1[@ NA (5) Stonn drain inlets have been adequately protected.
S M U NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized.
S M NA (7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained.
S @ U NA (8) Public &: private roadwaY' arc b.ing kcptclcar of accumu1atc<l sediment or traeked soil.
S M" U ~9) Erosion &: ,.dimenr control m'asure' h~'J. been mstall.d ..d maintained on indlviducl boi1ding ,iteS.
Status of Sediment Retention On-Site
~ Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation.
S( There is evidence of off site sedimentation.
Ii. Description provided:
SJE!2J tfEi:!.. r ~() ~Q b.E A t/ E-. llW T. E.
7""1-1 e 1-10 11~!5 oN 0 t) t3J./ '" D21lJE -IEA~T of
"Ix( Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report
!Compiled By: Definitions
Satisfactory: The item is currently in compliance with the rule
Marginal: A conc.rn has b..n id.ntified: cor....tiv. action Is strongly r.commended to r.main in compliance
Unsatisfactory: A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required
Not Applicabl.: Docs oot apply at this ,tage of constrUction ""un 4/98
,~"...
~ ..:..I!-. . -
o
o
ON-SITE EV ALUA nON FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: L.6W~S (1). Car"""J
. The items chec~ed below mU$t be, corrected prior to' ASAP IRUT /)ve, unless othe~ise noted.
o Install an appropriate sediment control practice between consfruction areas and lower lying areas.
o
o
o
ReplacelRepair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 ~ in.) and stake straw bales.
Remove accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapS/basins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet
protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with water) . .
Temporary seed, fertilize,and/ormulch: J.tJ~ III Z. ....d$hd ~,~~
,
x
w:
o Protect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inlets
" Reshape and stabilize sideslopes of: 0 sediment trapslbasins, }( detentionlltention b ins Sed "eU; ~ 'lti~
o InstalVMaintain construction entrance(s):
o Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
o Place greater emphaSis on erosion and sediment cont:'ol on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable constrUction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) t the end of ea work day.
~ Other Requirements: 'CH I'S
e.
Tk.e. ,,;-/t
pro i e e..t:
:r.1IL'S+ de
f'etl\c e
IS dow_ A...d
of&> if 41- SOI)""'-. ~W:I ~ f +4,'s
~~'f.1tJ'/u.'
c.~6c.k da~_....cll.r +~e ~tJu'fl,.. ~t4d 0 r
:"" 1~"S~k.7"Kf fo 7'o~ h..~
e/; kIc. Q ;'''1 ;n,
b ~~'" I~ f+
For questions regarding this report contact:
John South
..
"
ON-SITE EV ~{T'~TION FO~ EROSION AND SEDP~r:rr ~ONTROL
HamilllMt'County S(Ul and Water Conservati~lStrict
1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville, IN 46060
Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101
i
Date: r; /z '1/ of .
. .
Project Name: C 4r~&lJ.6~-e'~
Present at Site: John South, Hamilton Co. SWCD, SAt:."
, This ' report was Provided To:
-v ISL'
./ "fUJC'rD~
F': &. t!
Type OF EVALUATION:
o Initial II Routine ~ Follow-up 0 Complaint
This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identify areas where
additional measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be
evalu'!-ted as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices -designed by a qualified engineer.
All erosion and sediment control measures shall riieeHhe-deSign criteria," standards,-andspecific:ations-outlined-in the
"Indiana Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents.
Current Site Information:
11' L- ~"e. ~
seet>l/<J6 WAS l'IeeD~l>. $e'4"J)I#6 71 44 c~H)JJtm:!.D 71fJFFllSrW~
.
- The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of:
S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = UnsatisfaCtory NA = Not Applicable
Construction Site Management forE,rosion and'Sediment Control " '
S M @ NA (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and
-, sediment control measures. '
S M (ij) NA (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented.
S (1) NA (3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures.
~M U NA (4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly.
S M ~ NA (5) Storm drain inlets have been adequately protected.
S M NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized.
S M NA (7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained.
<;> M U. NA (8) Public & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soil.
S M U -m::> (9) Erosion & sediment control measures h~ve beeninsta1!edand maintained on individual building sites.
Status of Sediment Retention On-Site
y(. Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation.
gJ There is evidence of off site sedimentation.
~ Description J>r~vide9: I
1f", .d r, :.tl
~ r.
4~Me/ ,,~
~ Please Refer to the Comments Section ~fthis Report
Compiled. 13Y: Defmitions
Satisfactory: The item is currently in compliance with the rule
Marginal: A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance
Unsatisfactory: A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required
Not Applicable: Does not apply at this stage of construction . Revised 4/98
o
o
..
ON-SITE EV ALUA TION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: L.6W~~ ~ CarlMd
The items checked below must be corrected prior to ASAP /lbsT J:Jwe., unless otherwise noted.
o Install an appropriate sediment control practice between conslruction areas and lower lying areas. .
o
o
o
ReplacelRepair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 ~ in.) and stake straw bales.
Remove accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet
protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with water) . J
Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch: U-r * z. ....d ShdG ,01' J'
,
'f.
'"
o Protect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inlets
" Reshape and stabilize sides lopes of: 0 sediment trapslbasins, (detentiOnlltention b
o InstalVMaintain construction entrance(s):
o Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
sed nc.u ~ litis
o Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment cc:introl requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) t the end of ea work day.
f.. Other Requirements: e 'o~ ,'S
T~ .silt fet'\ce "'5 do....,_ A.d flJll 4?- SD&J'ik ~M.Ci iJr .,t.,"s
Ore j e eo+:
.
Cxi~lt 0'0.'
V... c:Fe.
~~u'ft. . f!J4d 0 f J~ Q /#111 IfJI
+0 ffJoKri he' ~ & c elC. I ~ .f f
f
For questions regarding this report contact:
John South
~l "';::::,.
(I g,-oI
18/16/2881 89:43 317-776~1 HAM~LTON CO USDA ~
ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR EROSION'AND SEDl1\mNT C
Hamilton County Soil an.d Water ConservatlOll Distri
, 1108 South 9tb Street, Noblesvillet IN 4~060 l."-
, Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1181
Datt: t),."1"()"'~ .lZ. Z~I .' .
,
_~.tt__~ rA.~:~
',' ~~'I .
Type OF BV ALUA nqN:
o Initlal 0 Routioe III Follow-up 0 Complaint
This e'faluati~n is jn~nded to assess the level of compllince with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It Is also intend~d to identify areas where
additional mcasureg may be n!quired to control erosion and sedbnentation. All praotioes reoommended in this report should be
eval~ted as.to their feasibility. by a qualific~ individual with sbuctural practices designed by a ql1allfied engineer.
~ ~ /'
-~- ~-;;:I...:~~oo;c
:rtJD'A*~/S, Xu' .'
~L&&O
81/82
projec:t Na.ue:
".
, Present at Site: Jehn Seutb, Hamliton co. SWCD,
. AI' erosion and sediment control m~ll5Ur~ shall meet the design criteria, standard., and .peaGeatlou. outlined in the
, "Indiana Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance dDCuments.
'CurrentSitelnformatlon:' "tJ~.r. 8J./Q If ptDN"J:) HAS ~t!!!E..jJ..F.ILl.lth. ,/~~ ;JJ~
'. _DI'P~P It kP IS PJ.4U!.D. ,.'.'
'r'r'H5 ,DH PJ2lEl.JlbOS 1/!!lJieii.J. :.4.a A/l)T' {tJltJ1ii.ETF,
S,.r4 ,~ 114<<Jddl!!'HJ:JleD F()~,A aJAbI/J/~ o,J/()A1.~OIfPJ."
The FOUowing.ltems 'Ba"e Been Evaluated and Amgnecl * Designation of:
S .. Satisfactory M = MargiDal . U == Uusatlsfactory NA = Not Appneable
ConttruetioJ.!{te Management ft)r Erosion and Sediment Control '
S M Uk' NA (1) ~ areas have been adequaely protected through se. or other appropriate erosion and
, sediment control measures. .
S " M <ID NA (1) Appropriate perimeter'Sed1ment control measureS have been implemented. '
, S M ~ NA (3) Conv~ce chumels have been stabil~d or proteoted with appropriate secilment ,control measures. ,
. S'~. U NA (4) Erosion &: sediment control measures are insmlled properly. .' , .
S T.t NA (5) StGrm'dJ:ain inlets have been adequately protected. .
, S M NA (6) OUdets have been adequately stabiljzed. ' . .
S. M NA (7)':&isting erosion.& sediment control measures are being maintafned.
S (B) . NA (I) Public &: private roadways are being kept cl~ of accum1d!rted sedime>>t or tracked soil.
S M U ~9) Erosion &: sediment oontrol meas~ h~ve been installed and maintained on individual building sites. '
Status of Sedhnellt Retenti6D On-Site .'
i Site conditions pre8W a high potential for off-site seclimentatlon.
. T'ber.e is evidenee of off site sedimentation.
Dcscriptiort ptovided:' ' " .
, , 56DII'fEiJr. "OA~CJ 'SAV4fS 11./ TilE. 0 t"T~M Bl!HJ#JO
, Till!!' J./C'HES DN tJuBJ.IN DIt.II}" ~IEA~T 0' D.lJiJJI/J!l.DI/!,JJit.
, .
)(, Please Reller to the ComGleots Section of tbls :Report
1C'000piled By: Definitions '
Satisfactory: The ltellJ is currently In compliance with the rule
Malrgi,al: A concern bas beell iienti(ied; corrective action is strongly recommended to remahl in compUan~
, Uusatlsf'adory: A VIOlartlOD has beeil identified and the site is not in compliance; t:ornctive Bdion is retI..ired
, Not Applicable: Does Dot apply at th1a stage of cOo.truction Rn1lU4/ 98
18/16/2881 89:43
317-77601
HAMIL TON CO USDA ()
PAGE 82/82
'i,- --r
ON~SITE EV ALVA TION FOR ER9srON AND SEDIMENt' CON1'ROIt
COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME: ""IAJ~~ ~ e.4t"W.~
Tho 'toms ehu~e4 below must be corrected prior to A ~AD 1.11 DRs.. unless otberwise noted.
o Install an appropriate sediment control practice be~ and lower lying areas.
o Replace/Repair slit fence anellQr straw bale baniers.
o Entrench silt fenoe (6-8 in.) anc:llor straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales:
o R.emove ae<;\Unulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 behind slit fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain, inlet
protection devlm, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with wJter) , . . L
X Temporarysoed,fertlUze,andlormu)ch: ur" ~ '~S$~ I';~S
~ ~ '
cI /, Ict .
..
o Protect stonn drain lnlef$: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop Inlets
tt Reshape and stabilize side510pes of: 0 sediment traps/baslns, ~ detention/I'
0' Inst:alVMaiDtain constrUction entrance(s):
o RellhBpe and ~ilizc conveyance ~hannels:
ins seM' "eu) ~ "IIJ~
o 'plaCe greater emphaSis on 8fOsion md sediment control on building sites; contractors, sUbc;ontractors, material vendors. and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control rcquireroents. Appropriate perimeter s.ediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and ~ble construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) t the end ofea work day.
,. Other R.equirements: I~H J ~I
TIt.e ,i/f feKCe
pnj C e.:r.
;x",~T~ el... c.1c
,'J d.taJ~ ....J ~ at lti",tk f.""J iJ r +I...'s --
Woc4/"
+I..~ ~tmt' ~M.d b f J;/.J... II II" ~I
b<l I,..: I. {J-
d.1M.
For questions regardin-g this repor1 contact:
John South
. u..u I.
. Ifl/fl2/2f181 12: 18
317-776.,.1181
HAMILTON CO USDA
PAGE 01/82
;;
~
efFi'VED
_, , 200t
DOCS
ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL II
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation Distriet 12
1108 South 9d1 Street, Noblesville, IN 46060
Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776..1101
Date:
t/z.'tIDI'
,..
ProJeet NaDiei
Present at Site: John Soutb, Hamilton Co. SWCD,
Fit.1t rlJO'~~I", :rtl
Type OF EVALUATION: t/,zetJ
o Init[al, C 'Routine ~ Follow-up 0 Complaint , ,
This evaluation is intended to WeBS the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15.5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identifY areas wbe~
additiol1al measUres may be requited to control erosion and sedimentation. Alll'raotices recommended ill this report should be
, evalu~ted ~ to their fcasibjIity by II. qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qua1ifiedengin~.
AU erosion .nd sediment coiitrol m~asurt$ shall meet the design criteria. standards. and specifications outlined In the
"Indiana Handlrook for Erosion Controlln Developing Areas" or similar guidance documentS.
Cuttent Site Information: 1bI,Jrl""~ 'PIJIID , $ AI1IN~ ~lJr '1 J!II.I.6l:J..
. ' , L"t&.J"'" llwl.t:UN6 ullOe~ ~CNST~TI.tJN.. '
~ ~~ r~
~'IFPlN6 wAf Nee/>/!/). S61.li16 '11 16 4N/r17l!!!J) T/fIS'Ms"~
, , .
, The Follol'blgltems Have BeeD Evaluated aDd Assigned a DesigDadoll of:
S ,lI!I Satisfactory M"" MargfDal ' U "" UDsatisfactory NA a Not AppUcable
Constructloll Site Management tor Erosion and Sediment Control
S M @ NA (i) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and,
sediJlleot control measures.
S M tfi) NA (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented.
S ~ 1f NA (3) Conveyance chBlll1els have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures.
([)M U NA (4) Erosion &: sedhnent cootrol me8S1IteS are installed properly. ' ,
S M f N~ (5) Storm draitt inlets have been adequatel)' protected.
S M NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized. '
S, M NA ('7) ExiJtiJ1g ero$ion,& sediment tontrol mea5W'eS are being maintained.
t;> M NA (8) Public" private roadways are being kept olear of accumulated sediment Of tnlcked soil.
S M 'u 'm:> (9) Erosion &: sediment control me~es h~ve been. installed and maJntaJned on Individual building sires.
, Status of Sediment RetentiOn Oil-Site
'ji Site conditions pnlseirt II high potential for off-site sedimentation.
m There is evidence of Qff lIite sed.UnentJltion.
lI!l DeScription.l~~idCji: ' l' . / / / /
, ", ,';t;.,-~~)t';;'.1 s::~. '1IJd, . f "~11IIe1 . ~A1"
tJs4/3/ t'S
tf 'Please R.~er to the ComlBentf Section of this Report
Compiled. By: Defiftidons
Satlsfactory: The item Is currently In compUa~ce with the rule ,
Margina); A concern bas been Icfeutlfted; corrective aetion Is strongly recommended to remain In compll~llte
Unsatisfactory: A violatloD has ""0 tdeutifted a,nd tbe site is not In compHanee; corrective action Is required
Not Applicable: Does Dot apply at tbls stage or COhStructlon klIBG./ / 98
18/82/2881 12:18
317-776-1181
Q.)
HAMILTON CO USDA
U
PAGE 82/82
'"
ON-SITE EV ALVA TIQ~ FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL
COMMENTS
PR.OJECT NAME: L61AJt') f'ij) f:.4r.1AA.,)
, The Items c~ec~ec1 below must be c:or~ected prior to A SA~sriJ!l!., un-teu otherwIse noted.
o blstall an appropriaie sediment control practiee between con otlon areas and lower lying areas.
o ReplaeeJRepair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
o Sntrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bllle barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales: _ ,
o Remove aCCI:1Jnulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around' stonn, drain inl"et ,
protection devices, 0 streets and g\lt:ters (Do nat flush with water) . _ I
~ Temporary seed,fertilize. andlormulch: Urlll:. ..d ,~d D,~I
r. ,
.
o Protect stonn drain inlets: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inleu
" Reshape and stabilize sideslop~ of: 0 sediment trapsJbasins, pc'detentioM
o InstalllMaintain c:onstrudtion ~trance(s):
o Reshape and stabilize conveysnoe channels:
s~u" <<el41 !Jllllh
0' 'Place ~ tmphasis on tl'osion and sediment control on building sites; contractors. subcontractors, material vendors. and
others Should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter s.ediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and ~ble construction entranCe5 shall be utilized on all siteS. Sediment tracked into the street sh.1l be
removed (dO riot flush with water) t the end of ea work day.
, ~,', Other Requinm1ents: I '" ,.
't~Je~Jt
.%"S~
ret1.~ _ .' I d elJ\A, ... J fa) ~ for .ftUJ'ik. ~~ IJ' 'i4 ""S _ .
J.~ ..e4r ~e ~6bll.. t!1tL.J D f
.Jo rDi!JJ It,~
. , -
,/; JJ.. Q"" iill.
Itc,14. I, r+ .:
For questions regarding this report contact:
John South
__1_-
.w
u
CITY OF CARMEL
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
(317) 571-2417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Fax
To:
~\3T ~rt'\, ~~
l..tI ~~- &./ , s 3
From:
~~~
;L
~. 01. ". lD .\
Fax:
Pages:
Phone:
Date:
Re: C(!.. '\ ~. Q.. W....~ ~E: pO k'\ cc:
o Urgent 0 For Review 0 P.Jease Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
~\...~~~
::3t ~ Iii. :
\ \ B- (~::)\
~ ~~ ~ ~Y'h__""~')
LC)~(;.\~
.D t=- ~~l...-
",.
u
Q
:--
Johnson, Sue E
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Dobosiewicz, Jon C
Monday, September 17, 2001 9:01 AM
Johnson, Sue E
Lillig, Laurence M; Hahn, Kelli A; Hollibaugh, Mike P
Docket Number Assignment - ADLS Amend; Lowe's of Carmel
Sue Ellen,
Please issue the necessary Docket Number for the Lowe's of Carmel. It will be the following:
\\8 ~
M-OIADLSAmend ~?~\D
Total Fee: $350
\l~
Docket No. W-Ol ADLS Amend; Lowe's of Carmel
Petitioner seeks amended Architectural Design, Lighting & Signage approval for a building modification. The
site is located at the southeast comer of 146th Street and US 31. The site is zoned PUD.
Filed by Dave Smith of Ratio Architects, Inc. for Lowe's.
The petition will be placed on the October 2,2001 Special Studies Committee agenda. We have received the 10
information packets to be mailed out to Commission members with the Special Studies Committee Agenda.
Please contact Mr. Smith at 633-4040 with this information. Once the docket is assigned please return the file to
my office. ~ ~~~-"ll 'i ~ ~......)C.")
Thanks, "'f ""')( ~ po ~ ~ t ') - IS) l 1 \ '. '7 .t:\"'" .
/
Jon ~
1
J,
'0
(*)
CITY OF CARMEL
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 4aJ32
(317) 571-2417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Fax
To:
~-s.- ~,-.-A
Le~~-~JS3
From:~~
Pages: ;;L.
Date: ~ -I } -0 f
Fax:
Phone:
Re:
l-.~\~ Of ~~'--
ee:
o Urgent
o For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
VL.....~
~L..-4-..
" r-
~~
l ~:r~~
'''?> "'e~~, ~_~.
RATIO
.
ARCHIHCTS
Architecture
Intenor Design
landscape Architecture
Preservation
Urban Planning
Ratio Architects, Inc.
Suite 100
107 S. Pennsylvania St.
Indianapolis, Indiana
46204-3684
3176334040
Fax: 317 633 4153
www.RatioArchitects.com
ADLS Amendment submittal
09.14.01 ! ',,<~ ax Total Pages_
Depar~m.ent of Community DevelopmentServi~fs, Th~terMD D ~:\"~r -up
One CIVIC Square fo~{ 1. ~, C dONE
Carmel, IN 46032 \~;;ii, 8EP . LWP'~ senger 0 e_
,-=-\ DOCS D al
P: 571-2417 F: 571-242tKt?
Attention: JON DOBOSIEWICZ
Project:
Ratio No.:
Reference:
Dateffime:
To:
CD
Q
TRANSMITTAL
Lowe's Of carmel
00153.002
Delivery Via:
DE-mail
From: Dave Smith
D Review and Comment ~ Information / Use
Enclosures:
Quantity
10
Remarks:
Jon:
D For Approval
D Under Separate Cover
Date or Number Description
09.14.01 Copies of ADLS submittal documents with attached narrative of requested
amendments in 11 inch by 17 inch format.
09.14.01
original, executed, ADLS Amendment forms with attached narrative of
requested amendments.
09.12.01
Submittal filing fee check #27987, in the amount of $350.00.
Thanks
Please let me know if for any reason the filing forms are incomplete or unaccepatble.
Dave Smith
Senior Associate
Project Director
cc:
Route: Dave Rausch - Ratio Architects, Inc. CFOOI53.002
E:\2000\00 153\VII\JONDOBOSIEWICZ@Carmel.09.14.01.doc
~IO ARCHITECTS
P, 01
.'
_, APR-17 -01 TUE 05: 06 PM
FAX NO. 60153
7'
RATIO
II"
~~
ARCHITECTS
Aallheclum
Interior UB~Dn
landscape ArelJileeture
P,osorvation
Urban rJannina
A;,lio AfCMr.r.I~. loc
SUIre 100
107 $, Pennsylvania St
Indianapolis. IMlnM
4G:l0~ .3684
317.633.4040
~a~: 317.633.4153
www.A.lIioArchlte~ls.com
\.
\ ~
ApriI17.:!OOt
.. Ihe~ ~
APN JI ~/!)
DOCS 2001
Wllli.1m A Bmwnll. Jr Alt.
David J. RiJIJ~cll. AI^
S!8'1en R RI,Mq, AlA
P Tun 801 rick. ~SMPS
(cllucth M Bllveu, A~l.).
Mr. JOIl Dobosit:wicl
Planning Administrator
Depllrtmt!nt of Community S(rviccs
City ot' Carm~1.
Onl:: Civic S<lllll.r~ Slr~l:t
Carl~l, IN 46032
DOfl~ld K. ROllltJllbalqrll r,;.
!1r.bl1rlli Proctor. AlA
Tr..Jlllas A CIW8SIII.1Il. .\J,\
L1 COpy
Rc: Lo",.e's of Cur me I
II ~--o I (k'f){,.C:; A~
Dctlr JOrl:
As ::J. follow up to our telephone conversation cooceming the dimensions nnd scul~ of dle
building corniL'~ components, w~ offer the following:
To respond to YOllr most recenl question, the drawings slIbmiulild for zoning pUrpO!;e.l; illdic~\t~
that the tOp b~U1d of the c:ornict! projecL~ past the f:lee of the bllilding (bns~d on scaling the
building dcvutions l-ubmittcd for 7.oning review and approval) vo.rjc~ from 18 inches to 24
inche~, and the lower. recessed portion of the cornice ussembly is shown recessing 18 inehe!l
to 24inch~.~. During our m~eting. l-lriday, April 13, 2001., w.e indicated thut the size of tho
various compl1nent~ when rendered In color lose some of their accurncy.
As uiscus~cd during OUI' meeting. we initially drew the building elevations with tho )>lrgcr
cornice dim.:n:;ions and with [he dimensions as indicated on our final drnwings. After
comparing th~ elevntlons and clw;idering the proportions of th~ cOl'nice we elected to \tse the
~maller more proportionLllly appropriate cornice. Additionally, w~ also studied the cornice
projeclion, anI! again. in OUI' professional opinion, [he mOl'e I'emained (smaller) dimensions
were the most appropriale.
Regarding the reces~ dimension of the lower comice band, This is bolh " proportion nnd
pnlgmatic issu~. Considering the proporlion issue, the rece~s WM studied wit" the overall
evaluiuion ot' th~ ~nlire COrnice a'lsembly. rrom 11 pragm!uic point of view. our wall thi(,:kncss
b only 14 indll:S, which would reasonably preclude the 18 to 24 inch ~c~ss indicated 011 the
zoning suhnlis.~ion document... This is not to say thar the recess cunnor be deeper. however,
we fel[ that a r~cl.1s:o; del:pcr Lhan the 4 and one half inches <.\s shown on our final dmwings
would create even greater opportunity fOr bird roosting so we opted to minimize the I'oosting
ledg~ llno mmn\nin tho morc Shil110W recess.
1'0 salisfy our original decision regilrding the proportions wc have modified the cornice
dimcn~ion..; and adjusted the building hdght tlccording1y, compL\red the rcvl~ed version with
th~ must rcc:crll sub.nissiollll.llu in our professional opinion smaller proportions Qrc more
appropJiate [crhl'! o\l3rall ~cul~ of the building.
";I.!CJ(.x)\{XII~.l\YI\t:n"llI:l1'I.1DlUnJlIU 17 UI doc
APR-17-01 TUE 05:07 PM
CY 0 AROH I TEOTS
FAX NO. 63~4153
U
P. 02
.
,
Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz
Page 2
April 17, 2001
it is never our intent (to pi.1raphruse YOU) to provide a '"'Timex" wh~n we present~d a "Rolex",
Our u(;cision.' ill this cus~. to adjust certain dimensions. were dictated by what we believe to bt.:
lh(: most approprilltl;l. e~lhoticall>, pleasing .mu proportionally correct solution to the d~sign
pl'ob1~m,
S~-A
David A. Smith AlA
Senior Associate .
cc; l:1ma~ Welch - Lowc's Compnnicll, Inc.
Paul Rcis - The Rcis L.1w Firm
John Schelling - Kito C~m!iLruction. Inc.
Dnvll RllU~ch. Ralio An;hilects. Inc. I CF 00153.000 \VI
It \lXl\l(l '.1\'i.\MrlJo lJiI
\
\
KITE GREYHOUND, LLC
6610 North Shadeland Avenue
Suite 200
Indianapolis, Indiana 46220
December 20, 1999
Danbury Estates Homeowner's Association
c/o Mr. David Rushing
14505 Dublin Drive
Carmel, Indiana 46033
Re: Kite Greyhound, LLC
l46th Street & U.S. 31/S.R. 431, Carmel, Indiana
File Number: 2005/1
Dear Mr. Rushing:
Please allow this to serve as a formal commitment that Kite Greyhound, LLC will
construct a four (4) foot mound and four (4) foot wall between the property described in the
attached Exhibit 'A' and the western boundary of the Danbury Estates Subdivision. In addition to
the mound and wall, Kite Greyhound, LLC will also plant trees along the mound and wall to
provide additional screening. The exact location of the mound, wall, and landscaping shall be
mutually agreed upon by Kite Greyhound, LLC and the Danbury Estates Homeowner's
Association. The construction of the mound, wall, and landscaping will be completed before the
two proposed buildings on the site open for business.
In addition to this commitment for screening, Kite Greyhound, LLC will also take
reasonable efforts to assist in the development of the adjacent acreage owned by Bayview
Development Company, Inc. for a single family residential community.
If you need further information please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Thank
you for your assistance and cooperation in this matter.
Very truly yours,
~GREYHOUN:' LLC
\ .0-b.h
P~~l w. Kite
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Paul G. Reis, Esq.