HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact 122-01 SW
u
u
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui tab i 1 i t Y 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
~lan.
.-L Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this I 5 day of 0- anu~
~
--- C mm!ssion Member
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
u
u
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: S CO 6 . 2
Brief Description of Variance: Suitability of Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
_ The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
/lan
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this / $' day of ~,.
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
4~
." 4kh~
Commission Member .
u
Q
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: S CO 6 . 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui t ab i 1 i ty 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
~ Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this 1c;J'k day of ~
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
-~c.{{~
omml Slon em er
u
u
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Suitability of Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
c-
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
/'
Dated this (.5 day of ~
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
,;:li)(j ?--
.~~ -r k4/
Commission Member
1_
u
u
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui t abi 1 i ty 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
/' Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
Dated this /!; day of ~ .
_~~ _ _J~
u
()
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui tab i 1 i t Y 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
~ Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
.---
Dated this \ S'""' day of .j ,"-- ~ b.. y'" t
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
~.o~~
~.- - -"
Commission Mem r -
-- -- _____________L__
u
()
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Suitability of Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
N
,
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this II; day of
J &-Y)
~ j..1Jt! ~ /' ~
.-r7T Z-- -1~
Commission Member
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
__ _ - __ _ __ _ ____L_____ ____ ______
u
()
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: S CO 6 . 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui t ab i 1 i ty 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
yan.
~ Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this IS-- day of ~1J,,{1"
s:\forrns\subvarfo.rm 10/95
'~~dd#'~
Commission Member
1_-
w
u
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: S CO 6 . 2
Brief Description of Variance: Suitability of Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
~ Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this /~day of
J:.. "'-1
. ~ u-c-
5Z.~.~ .\\
(1' Commission' Member
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
__ __ __1______
w
(,)
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Suitability of Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
V plan.
-D-- Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this I J day of ~
p7
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95
,;<Olt 2-
..~-"~
;;;;;r; --...
-~-_. .........
., Commission Member
n________m~ -_____~__J____~___
u
u
CARMEUCLAY PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No: 122-01aSW
Petitioner: Robert Fecitt
Section Variance: SC06. 2
Brief Description of Variance: Sui t ab i 1 i ty 0 f Land
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of
a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat
will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and
such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an
unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance
is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive
plan.
/
Based on all the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the
requested subdivision variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
~ ~ ~ .8b C-D7~
Datedthis~dayof ~ ~-( ~ ~'--.l.- :-
s:\forms\subvarfo.rm 10/95 ~..-c~.
_._~____u______ ----_____1