Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket for BZA 02-27-23 530 2nd Avenue NE Variances Docket #: PZ-2023-00002 V; PZ-2023-00003 V; and PZ-2023-00017 V DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE REQUESTS CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA February 27, 2023 Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Applicant: Wedgewood Building Company, LLC Attorneys: Nelson & Frankenberger, LLC James E. Shinaver, Attorney Jon C. Dobosiewicz, Land Use Professional TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Explanation of Request 2. Site Location Map 3. Site Plan Enlarged Site Plan Landscaping Plan 4. Color Front Elevation 5. Home Plans 6. Findings of Fact and Ballot Sheet for Lot Coverage Variance 7. Findings of Fact and Ballot Sheet for Window Well Variance 8. Findings of Fact and Ballot Sheet for Roof Pitch Variance EXPLANATION The applicant, Wedgewood Building Company, LLC ("Wedgewood") is the owner of a parcel of real estate that is commonly known as 530 2nd Avenue NE, is identified as Lot 31 in the C.W. Weidlers Addition and, per the Office of the Auditor of Hamilton County, Indiana, has a Tax Parcel Identification Number of 16-10-30-05-02-013.000 (collectively, the "Real Estate"). Behind Tab 2 is a site location exhibit showing the location of the subject Real Estate. The Real Estate is zoned R-3/Residence and Old Town Overlay District Subarea and Wedgewood is seeking the below described development standards variances in order to construct a custom residential home on the Real Estate. Enclosed is a site plan with blowup that shows the positioning of the home on the subject lot(see Tab 3), a proposed landscape plan (see Tab 3), color home elevation(see Tab 4), and home construction plans(see Tab 5). Associated with the construction of the home on the Real Estate, Wedgewood is seeking approval of the following development standards variances requests from the Board of Zoning Appeals: UDO Section 3.64 (C)(3) Maximum Parcel Coverage — Maximum 45% lot coverage allowed; requesting 49%lot coverage. The application of the UDO Lot Coverage standard results in practical difficulties in the use of the site because the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized floor plan and site layout to accommodate their needs. In particular, the coverage could be modestly reduced by reducing the length of the driveway. However, the lots falls toward the alley and extending the driveway provides a more gradual grade which will be more accommodating for access to the home from the driveway. Development of the site will comply with all other required standards and requirements related to drainage and the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate development on the Real Estate for a custom residential home. Due to the foregoing,absent approval of the requested variance pertaining to the maximum allowable percentage of lot coverage,the Applicant will be substantially impacted on how it is able to accommodate the necessary design for the unique medical needs of the future owner. UDO Section 5.79 (J) Window Well Projections—Window wells may encroach up to 24" into a side yard; requesting 36"encroachment into west 5' wide side yard. The design intention was to have wider window wells to meet egress requirements for the bedroom and exercise room (which could also function as a future bedroom). Further, the media room window well is the same as the others and its design was also intentional -to let in as much natural light into the space as possible, especially since this window is on the north facing side of the home. The home design footprint and therefore the position of the window wells were intended to take into account the unique needs of the future owner. The proposed custom home is well-designed and positioned in a manner that should not result in any negative impacts with the least amount of relief necessary to eliminate the practical difficulty regarding the window well encroachment. UDO Section 3.64 (C)(9) Minimum Roof Pitch — Minimum 8:12 roof pitch required; requesting 4:12 roof pitch. The custom home was designed with a 4/12 roof pitch, which is appropriate and customary for a Prairie architectural style of the home.An 8/12 roof pitch would not be in keeping with the design spirit and intent of Prairie architecture and would not be an appropriate roof pitch for this style of home, as the roof would then overpower the home itself and the roof would become the most predominant architectural feature of the home—the element that the public would see most predominately when looking at the home from the street. Other Prairie style homes with a 4/12 roof pitch exist within the general vicinity of the Real Estate and the design of this proposed custom Prairie style residential home will be a complimentary addition to the area and will add to the architectural appeal of the streetscape by increasing the variety and diversity of architectural styles in the area. Included behind Tabs 6, 7 and 8 are the Findings of Fact and Ballot Sheets for the three (3) variance requests described above. The Findings of Fact included herein explain in detail the nature of and rationale for each requested variance summarized above. We look forward to presenting this request to you on February 27, 2023. Respectfully submitted, Jon Dobosiewicz Ji ver • ,,: ,,,_.!..., t t,ti"; I 1' + 1 S. ti''.,- '-r "_ • ,1 •. 1-1.1..! . , 4 1 N.rsi s ( t 1 4 . r -= to 1 ...__ i_44.,:i_ . , , Aiii -'-"----111111%Ilir- t4 lit i I 1 1. ',. h ;11 Tj U.1 -n . i i iii jy •' .{ .«ems.,I1.;i .,....: - -.'. '•-/. . L4.. i• .'.',A. "'-, -.._ ,Oa p,;.`. . ._.. - r ; _ .. . SITE N 1I.0 g.i . r • .fir' f Y 1,„ .0. .. ,.y j 1 4 I 1 1 4 , ; , kul)p...T -- - , li - •'"'t • .{ j {- , I a.,;; i,�. n y 4 I n .--- t it li k 41..1 Or ' .,« SP+1AL - �` ; ., �:; '"` ,•` � E.smAL•L Sif ilr a:. 5. `Wt.... -. ; p ^L4 , •• - - F z�111 NORTH Site Location Exhibit C.W. WEIDLERS ZONING SITE PLAN CITY OF CARMEL NOTE: LOT 31 1) THAT PORTION OF DRIVEWAY WITHIN ALLEY RIGHT—OF—WAY SHALL CONFORM TO CITY PREPARED FOR STANDARDS IN ALL RESPECTS. CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA WEDGEWOOD BUILDERS NOTE: BUILDER TO ENSURE POSITVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM STRUCTURE(S) 2) ALL KNOWN PLATTED AND PROPOSED 530 2ND AVENUE NE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLOT PLAN. DISTURBED AREA: 0.17± AC. Z 1'- CITY OF CARMEL LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION HOUSE AND GARAGE y 2,509±SOFT. I3 .,1 PORCH: 402±SOFT. PROPOSED I COVERED PATIO 0f SO.FT. RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS I g " PATIO/STOOPS: 0± San. I F.F.-841.5' I • Yn OF ; PRIVATE WALK: 97±SO.FT. GAR.—839.5' 1 �'.W DRIVE TO R/W: 5853 SOFT. I BSI FT-831.5 A4 21 s o /�` TOTAL LOT COVERAGE 3,593t SOFT. 4a o Ml SUMP DRAIN AND ROOF 5<� DRAINS TO BE HARD PIPED i AA p� S II LOT AREA: 7,456 SOFT. TO SUBSURFACE DRAIN STUB co a LOT COVERAGE: 48.2% PER CITY OF CARMEL �I N $z g �I PROJECT NO.13-06 "44.14' 9 F bB: PROPOSED CONI.I LIL— 1 �1 g J DRIVEWAY,MUST BE ` Te.l]' Y.00 CONCRETE IN ALLEY R/W • g g LATERAL' W NOTE: PROP. N g PROPOSED Z l DRIVE A. y in g RESIDENCE 2ar�5 \ ;r .(LU 7N. F.F.=643.7 yry h — IF HOMEBUILDER DECIDES TO ALTER DRIVE WITHIN R/W,DRIVE / ELECTRICAL SERVICE ? 31.57• MAT GAR.-NO.Y e a ^ S' Zpm ENTRY TO CONFORM WITH CITY OF CARMEL STANDARD PLAN 00311111111/0/// TO BE PROVIDED OVERHEAD / 5,00• 8511•T-833.Y 24.2' 1(' 10-21 A. CHANGES TO DRIVEWAY WITHIN R/W MAY REQUIRE \\\ A.T /�/ R 123J `� v', '.gt BOARD OF PUBUC WORKS APPROVAL \\AO� F,q RE * Qw �P �j 4j� OPEN CUT IN POROUS ASPHAL LOT 31 µ.y{ — THE LOCATIONS,DIMENSIONS.AND WIDTH ALONG THE f/�1S7E '!/ i ALLEY REQUIRED FOR GA PORCH - �� V PROPOSED PUBLIC SIDEWALK WERE SCALED OR TAKEN FROM t�G �Q I AND WATER SERVICE,TO TAPP 7,456 S.F. �� — C ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTOR PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS OR — t NO. 0. AND ACCESSED IN ONE UTIU ` Ib CN AS PROVIDED. TRENCH,SEE SHEET 3 FOR PA 1 11/4,.. OOZ I * NEEDED FOR CUT ON POROUS ASPHALita 144.04' ]j ` VERIFY SANITARY LATERAL LOCATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION t F G ,. eII31 y STATE OF — IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ♦./NOIAIAV : BUILDER/CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY THE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, '�9 ~•••w•••" c) F VACANT LOT BUILDING FEATURES ANDION.OVATHE IONSDPRIED USE OF THE STARTTPLAN THE LOCATION OF OTHER TIS ���,'"D SUFI;`\\\``� tl owNED BY SAME AS 31 ; FOR SECURING BUILDING PERMITS ONLY AND SHALL NOT BE USED FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. 3 O A r MINIMUM LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE: z 1) THE MINIMUM LOWEST ADJACENT GRADE 'j (MLAG) IS 840.6' FOR THE HOUSE PER CITY • OF CARMEL, AND IS 2-FEET ABOVE 2ND GRADE FLOWUNE/ AVENUE NE, 838.6 LOW POINT IN FRONT OF AS PER PLANS LOT. THIS IS THE MINIMUM GRADE OF ALL MINIMUM FLOOD PROTECTION GRADE: STRUCTURES, FOR ALL WINDOWS, DOORS, TYPICAL SWALE SECTION PIPE ENTRANCES, TOP OF WATERPROOF 1) THE MINIMUM FLOOD PROTECTION GRADE WINDOW WELLS, AND OTHER STRUCTURE (MFPG) IS 840.6' FOR THE HOUSE PER CITY MEMBERS. GARAGE MLAG IS 839.6'. OF CARMEL, AND IS 2-FEET ABOVE 2ND 000.0 —EXISTING GRADE AVENUE NE, 838.6 LOW POINT IN FRONT OF LOT. THIS I THEGRADE OF 1000.01—PROPOSED GRADE STRUCTURES,FOR ALLI MUM WINDOWS, D RS,LL PIPE ENTRANCES, TOP OF WATERPROOF LANDDEVELOPMENTCONSULTING DRM1:TAT DATE: 01/12/23 SCALE: 1' = 3D' WINDOW WELLS, AND OTHER STRUCTURE TRUE & LAND SURVEYING SERVICES JOBk 23-012 REV.: PAPER SIZE: 11 .17' MEMBERS. GARAGE MLAG IS 839.6'. 116LANDS RVEYINGSER ICES ZONED: F.F.E. HSE: 843.7' NOliTH Fishers 1 dMna 4A754 OLD TOWN CHARACTER SUB—AREA Phone:(317}841-R754 F.F.E. GAR: 840.7' Faz:(317}R41-R762 OLD TOWN OVERLAY M Y° " °"°�°°�"°" EmsU:TroyI Troy@Truenorthindy.com " 3 F.F,E. BSM'T: 833.7' SHEET 1 OF 3 . 1 a �r0a Owe 0=D 0 N U Z I W W W < 1 PROPOSED I W NLu RESIDENCE ELEVATIONS N Z o N a F.F. = 841.5' N j00 e / GAR. = 839.5' - a Z W BSM'T = 831.5' c0O a cpN Y N C, CD 1Q ZJO IX SUMP DRAIN AND ROOF W o a J DRAINS TO BE HARD PIPED N 0 �cc Q ' a. TO SUBSURFACE DRAIN STUB--N N N 0 a w a PER CITY OF CARMEL U M 36.8 , 839.7 0 839.2 j z CL Z PROJECT NO. 13-06 .81 ... Y44.14 1839.71' d- 1839.21 X f838.61 oLj Z o PROPOSED CONCRETE _ u.58.5 ) I l 0 w DRIVEWAY, MUST BE \ 1840.71 76.33' 9.00' 'n 840.2 1841.7 1 CONCRETE IN ALLEY R/W o o LATERAL* w PROP. 0 a" N w DRIVE ^) o < PROPOSED — Z cn a La N cQ, RESIDENCE 2.00'� w ELECTRICAL SERVICE— r F.F. = 843.7' o �m SIDEWALK i 31.57' 21.67' GAR. = 840.7' r, o- '' I z \ I TO BE PROVIDED OVERHEAD Lorr 5.00' BSM'T = 833.7' N 24.2' 1 it N w p. 839.0 12.33' N N > 0 N 1840.7.1 Q�.. OPEN CUT IN POROUS ASPHALT �^ LOT #31 841.0 ALLEY REQUIRED FOR GAS co 44.33' 1841.71 AND WATER SERVICE, TO TAPPED 4v 7,456 S.F. PORCH01 0 1 C AND ACCESSED IN ONE UTILITY - a' 10 o N TRENCH, SEE SHEET 3 FOR PATCH 1 1I x NEEDED FOR CUT ON POROUS ASPHALT c�M 1836.51 144.04' 84,.2'840.7 N ci 1841.21 1840.71 1 1839.51 co z o W o 0 VACANT LOT m o c o OWNED BY SAME AS 31 0vwi I Nt ry a W a N W a_Q 1-- cp H m X O N a N < a I} c 1h.Hoofed.a V*aadro lo For arc co ha d c �i k*a....Lays ad,s orb***d a**prea ad a.d.a. VS:�? n.rr.d m ur re,for ut...wows a+y.MM.r aw=. I' r bboWN nc nra.gm dabs to b.probIN q.mof*e,er A_i;i1n ianas11 comorycolon wead er�w ES rWol to,,be,.walks*.of ES ckn m.4.r..bd for VWer nq.rerud*,1*property aver arms a r.w+Anr rer Krow.fd'sbBbW. ...Ne blot k.d»o a*e era cv«.d W erdrer N,fir. 911boforl You dk} uo,w rn,.er er..nw.d w w,mas alb*ar Whir w.wka oaf.In w a< ALLY I- \ / 1 I I I DRNB.LAY LAM 1 I I I ELM FRONTIERI aqo STFPWG STONES O I 0 2 BO*OOD GREEN VB_VET I I I LAM I I 7 KARL FOERSTERGRASS-- 1 ; A I [ — FILCH BED ALONG SCE OF Frir-F HI 1 ID F ADA BED AL CNG SCE CF WIRE I I I I I L,4wi I .---- LAW I ...1 r 1 I — _ 1 2 HYDRANGEA WRIERBALL a FRONT PORCH I JAPANESE BLOCA OOD MAaE 10 '"r OW i lul II BOXWOOD GREEN VELVET 5 DRFT ROSE E.K I S laVe ' 1 7 GERANtf MAX FRB LAWN = 19X]C GLM-FElL1 TREE RECLINED 11 NYSSA STLVATICA 1 II4 L I CITY WALK I LAM STRP I 0 5 o a a F N FEET BELL/ ESPE RESIDENCE 4317 Sart e14 9. u.... ,„ Kg q530 2ND AVE NE 6:1)salsbery 8ro -0100 thers CARMEL, IN 46032 Landscaping Sat. 1983 t, , + a( �.. .' A alli ri . R'y,1.4 •• coteratc4M ••, wilt secs ,4 •r. MT:FLUE SHINGLES PER SPECS ��1 TS$FASCIA TYP - .. - TRY WRAPPED BOX BEAM ♦ .�..• REFER TO ROOF PLAN FOR SOFFIT DETAL TYP IXA FREE1f BOARD TYP. 11111•` T.O.PLATE(MAIN) A \ Ixiz CORNER iRu IN _�- N T.O.GARAGE WALL j \ BOARD RIPPED TO Rt t%6 COMER BOARD TYP, SCREENED PANELS PER SPECS £ 1 I IA RANDOM 1RM WRAP TYR e SLOPED BRICK RO.YLOCNCM WITH P RUBBER THROUGH FLASHING TYP. -- LAP SIONG PER SPECS " 1!%1 F)CW'11000OlUMN FACE TRAI FACE CRIMPER SPECS -• WRAPPED COLUMNSWr 1x4 TRAP b BOULDER RETANRIG WALL TO _ _ - 1. R MAINTAIN F 6'DIFFERENCE SLOPED BRC6 ROWLOCK CAP WITH BETWEEN FINISHED FRONT L.___ ,_ RIBBER THROUGH FLASHING TYR PORCH AND FRONT WALK I - ^�- u • FIN.MAIN LEVEL 4 .4,6 -. T.O.FOUNDATION A \ ALKA TOP OF COLUMN W!TH BOTTOM OF ADJACENT BOx BEAU b i FIN LOWER LEVEL(9'WALLS) lip \ 1 FRONT ELEVATION 1/4'=1'-0- ......._„„ The Bell/Espe Residence ,Aeo x BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE y• J) „1 r fi Miiiiiiii •san.- • SEsa 1111101.11F., ill!! I11'1 �. - J p�Er IIIII� — J zga �ull _�° 3 °a :.�...+� lilt -o z o 0 3o Z g Hhi SPANISH TRANSLATIONS L COMMON EJ•FVATION NOTFS•LAS ROTAS DE LAS ELEVAC QR,ES COMMON DETAIL NOTES.LAS ROTAS OF I OS DFTAI IRS COMUNFT COMMON FRAMING NOTES•LAS ROTAS COH.IUNES DE BOR DEAR DRAWING INDEX R0.OJ CO#UNES DRYWALL-EL PANEL DE PESO DROP TO TOP OF WALL•BAJA A LA PARTE I.US ALTA DE LA PARED SM. CVn.M 3 SADDLE ROOF TO EXTEND THE MEASUREMENT•EL TECHO A DOS AGUAS TV MOUNTING HEIGHT•LA ALTURA PARA MORTAR LA TELEVISION SLOPE(MEASUREMENT)TO DOOR•NECESITA MEDIR LA INCLINACION A LA No. Shoat Nom• RARI.kn RAYNMR DAY Current R•NSC. ' PARAAMPLIAR TILE JOINT TO BE CENTERED ON FIREPLACE.CENTER LA JUNTA DEL PUERTA DAAMIMVN RAKE BOARD•EN EL TECRO,ES EL BOR DE CLUE TIENE EL INCLINACION EN AZULEJO EN UCHIMENEA (MEASUREMENT)CONCRETE SLAB OVER MEASUREMENT)MINIMUM Po STAIR ADJUSTMENTS LA ULTIMA PARED DE LA CASA TV REFERENCE.LA REFERENCIA PARA LA TELEVISION GRANDMA"(FILL•NECESRAMEDIR EL BLOQUE DE CONCRETO POR PT GREAT ROOM VIEW 0 Mille,r; EXPOSED AREA AT BOTTOM•LA ZONA OESPROTEGIDA EN EL FINAL TAPER SHOWER BASE TO DRAIN ON CENTER•DISMINUE EL BASE DE LA ENCIMA DE LA MATERIAL DE PIEDRA ROTA Po GREAT ROOM VIEW 2 '/ut•5 SC METAL FLUSHING CAP•UNA PIEZA DE METAL QUE CUBRE EL BOADE HAS DUCHA AL DESAGUE EN EL CENTRO FOUNDATION PLAN(I)CAR GARAGE OPTION•EL PUN DE LOS CIMIENTOS AD COVER SHEET ALTO DEL BASE SLIDING DOORS•LAS PUERTAS OUE PUEDEN DESLIZAX DEL GARAGE PARA LOS COCHES AI EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS APPLIED TRIM PILASTERS TYPICALLY AT FRONT ELEVATION CORNERS•LA GUTTER BOARD•EL TABLON PARA EL CANALON DROPPED WOOD BEAM•LA VIGA BAJADA AZ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PILASTRA QUE ESTA TIPICAMENTE EN LA ESQUINA DEL FRENTE DE TRIM BOARD TO COVER BOTTOM OF BOX BEAM•CORTA EL TABLON PARA FLUSH WOOD BEAM.LA VGA NIVELADA LA ELEVAGON CUBRIR EL FINAL DE LAVIGA TUBULAR POINT LOAD FROM ABOVE•SENALA LA CARGA AR RIBA Al EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PANEL SIDING•PONER PANEL ES HORIZONTAL SLIDING•DE DESLIZAR HORIZONTAL/AERIE SOLID BEARING•EL ANGULO SOLID° M EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SLOPED BRICK EDGE AT SILL E UN LADBASES L B SE DE LAO EN EL SSBORDE PANELLED S SHUTTERS• PI STEER OS CON PANELES XT SLOPEDOLID CEILING•EL TECHO ApO SI FOUNDATION PLAN TOP BEVELED EDGE AT PILASTER BASES•AL BARE DE %LTRA TIENE ALIGN FACES OF TRIM TO PIASTER•NNELA LOS EXTERIORS DEL SOLID BEARING UNDER POINT LOAD ABOVE•EL ANGULO SOlJDO DEBAJO DE UN TECHO BISELADO ESPACIO AL REVOQUE LACARGA ARRIBA M LOWER LEVEL FRAMING +m BRICK VENEER•El REVESTIMIENTO DEL UDRILLO CORBEL•LAME NSULA BULKHEAD•EL MAMPARO AA MAIN LEVEL ROUGH FRAMING - 1 BOX BEAM•LA VIGA TUBULAR OVER•POR E ROIMA DE STUD WALL•LA PARTE VERTICAL DE LA PARED OUE BORDEA M ROOF PLAN HORIZONTAL SIDING•EL REVESTIMIENTO HORIZONTAL TOP•LO MAS ALTOLA PARTE ALAS ALTA WALL WITH WOOD TOP CORNER BOARDS•LOS TARLONES EN LAS ESQUINM ALIGN•NNEULA• PARED CON LA COMA DE MADERA M LOWER LEVEL INTERIOR FINISH BRICK SILL•LA REPISA DEL UDRILLO _ RETURN AIR•WEIVA EL NRE TRIANGULAR LOUVER•EL LISTON TRIANGULAR WIDTH.EL MICRO TOP OF BOX BEAM•LA PARTE MAX ALTA DE LA TOGA TUBULAR ID 0 MAIN LEVEL INTERIOR FINISH SPACED BEIWEEN•PARACREAK EL ESPACIO ENTRE BOX BEMI•UVGA TUBULAR IDI INTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS FIXED WINDOW.LA VENTANA INAMOUBLE THICK. NTE DUCT CHASE.EL CONDUCT° El LOWER LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN OF plArID EXPOSED AREA AT BOTTOM-LA ZONA DESPROTEGIDA EN EL FINAL TO TOP OF PGTE(WALL)•A U PARTE MAX ALTA DE LA PARED WOOD BEAM•LA VGA DE MADERA EZ MAIN LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN C FRONT ELEVATION•LA ELEVACTON EN EL FRENTE BEARING HEIGHT•DE SOPC/RTAR LA ALTURA ACCENT TILE WALL•EL DUCT JO ESPECIAL PA.LA PARED ER UPPER LEVEL ELECTRICAL PLAN C PANELED SHUTTERS•LOS PEL S CON PANELES CEILING•EL TECHO EL CIELO RASO VERIFY HEIGHT FOR DUCT CHASE ABOVE WALL IN ATTIC•NERIFICALA d SHINGLED ROOF RETURN•EL TECHO DE VARIES TEJM PARA VOLVER ALTURA PARA EL CONDUCT°ARM.DE LA PARED EN EL ATI O 9 PORCH •EL COUMPG EN EL PORCH COORDINATE WALL WITH CABINET LAYOUT.COORONA LA PARED CON EL W GARAGE DOOR SIDE TRIM•U PUERTA AL LUDO EN EL GARAJE PARA COMMON ROOF PLAN NOTES•EL PLAN DE REVISER LAS ROTAS PARA EL CE TAR TECHO COMUN EQUAL FRAME•U ESTRUCTURA GUAL H W GARAGE DOOR HEAD•El FRENTE DE LA PUERTA EN EL OARAIE SADDLE ROOF TO EXTEND T BEYOND BRICK•A TECHO A DOS AGUAS EQUAL FRAME TO OTHER WALL RETURN•LA ESTRUCTURA IGUAL A OTRA TE al W TO TOP OF GUTTER•A LA PARTE MAS ALTA DE LA CANALETA PARA EXTENDER RASTA UN PLINTO DEL LADRILLO PARED W Ct TO TOP OP HEADER•A LA PARTE MUG ALTA DE LA VIGA BEAM FOR SWING.LA VGA PARA APOYAR EL COLUMPIO m WADER HEIGHT•U ALTURA DE U VGA COMMON FINISH PLAN NOTES•lAS ROTAS CCMUNFS PARA TFRMINAR FLPORCH SWING•EL COLUMPIO PARA EL PORCHE LLI TO TOP OF LANDING•A LA PARTE MAS ALTA DEL DESCANSILLO A. E. MA BEARING HEIGHT•ELAPOVO PARA LA VIGA PUN N AL W In RECESSED SLAB•EL BLOOIE RECOVECO W ALIGN MEASUREMENT FOR TRIM BOARDS•NIVELA LOS TABLONES QUE W ce FOHTALECEN EL BASE COOKTOP•LUVRROCERAMICA ` W W GARAGE CEILING HEIGHT•U ALTURA DEL TECHO DENTPO DEL GSHSJE OPEN SHELVES BELOW TO LOOK LIKE FURNITURE PIECE•ABRE LOS m y FINISH MAIN LEVEL•TERMIRA U NNEL PRINCIPAL ESTANTES DEBAJO DEL ARIARIO PARA PARECERSE COMO LA PIEZA d DE LOS MUEBLES m Q w 0 TO TOP OF FOUNDATKKN•AUPARTE MAS ALTA DE LOS CMIENTOS VOID•EL ESPACIO y TO TOP OF PLATE(MAIN)•A LA PARTE MAX ALTA DE LA NOJA PRINCIPAL TEXTURE WALL•LA PARED DE LA TEMURA `Lwco IN aCL 0 FINISHED UPPER LEVEL•LA NNEL MAS ALTA TERACTS DADA ZERO THRESHOLD•EL UM BRAL F N�m tU TO TOP OF PLATE(UPPER).A LA PARTE MAS ALTA DE LA HOJA MAS ALTA FINISHED BASEMENT LEVEL•LA NIVEL DA DEL SOTANO RIGHT.LEFT,FRONT.REAR -LA ELE ELEVATION•LA ELEVACION A LA DERECNA A LA IZQUIER DA.A LA FRENTE,V DE ATRAS AO 4 1-1 I I E e li I I '--, lip �� I I ;1 €' ill li III ® I/./...,,,..I i ‘ I. mi I t Ir__. .. I . II�h�In [ 4 I I E1 _� .� I p! s 11 p ig - II - I c.�. .i ,i tiff fix 1 11 li 1 1 1 1 1 1 I �VLLL V I5 gE a .t 56 I- ? ag . ImmINOMO!ill Allis ' ,o rill ,,'� P1 D q, 1 i 1 _1 i3 O 1lll, i II g t g 1 The Bell/Espe Residence ,:GE:v\,\ Wedgewood Building Co.,LLC r D. D..avpon i D 524SA-BelVEspe ._.i.'- ""cp 32 First Street NE co,00a you wWp..woG e,,;e,,,p co.uc. I Carmel,IN 46032 1' BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE - 317.669.6300 reproduced. «odin.e�w�m'..l::.a... www.wedaewoodbc.com p"°'"'""np.,mi,�,rm...p,npr.n,a.,.r« EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WBC p.ma..ion catM pmtlickwwep.xooJbc.can tt S �a 111111 / Illy a 1 aII 4-a III a% j?/ I; I1 1 I I - i II II I 11 ; 141122-.1 1 I II i II 1 1 ens or nmes ' / I I \ 11' a �I It 11/ € i111 g I� IM! ,4g1 x The Bell/Es a Residence a... p ��E w Wedgewood Building Co.,LLC :IT:. �.. ti. 524SA-Bell/Espe 3 32 First Street NE• Copyright.a 2ou Wwy.wo I MI "` Carmel,IN 46032 u nvM.,«.n.a. .mmnn N BELL-ESPERESIDENCE f� 317.669.6300mwr. •^m«^wein.a.i�'ec* www.wedaewoodbe.com ero..Nn.^w�^+.w.^au»EXTERIORELEVATIONS WBC ^'�^^�otik+oemw@ II ° _ I 1 F I I I I I ► IJ III I I I 'I 1I �s . II I 1 1 1 I :rll""I:lli'f:rL"1:171a77"""lirill\,,Ilk. ,I1. � IIrllw1 ':1 I! ila il i1II I -:' CIII 9��I I ,,-111111111 �Iif f i up ,;,.I 1 i i I, II III I IJ I ' i1 i � # 1 ilI I � � II,I Il II � I � ,- 1 ,ill' j1ill I I ,il r �I enare � ,I! !VI.. UV OF WADER I A 1 ' ' II! ► !II ill I 1 II €lay71 rill II :� � �I� � I � Iil �Zo I , I I Iy II6� , L11 ;NM / o IS % o, Y�iiapr ymi 66e6 • $ �iiil TheBeIIIEs a Residence R°p 4�GEWGo WedgewoodBuilding Co.,LLCOdds o••=ro�• D524SA-BeNEspe 3 0 32 First Street NE C.GY qM O 2 W.Gp.* Bulkl q C.LLC. Carmel,IN 46032 31 N rq�h r.urv.E.TNn m.t.n.l m.Y nol b. CO BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE +° 317.669.6300 ,.....a.rw.rm.an.a.:rn.0 u..:pr... �'y� c1'3 www.wedaewoodbc.com °"OrY.nn."w�m�.v.".rm.c.pnr non.r.F« EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WBC wmiaon mM.d o�ralok�neo..e.axcom I ICIi \ I I ! 3 is 3 31 I If i I III /,/ irii Ili imumi 1:\A\i ii�i'i1Pmmriff L 1 • I II are or n .1 i � , — _� .1i}, m TOP OF � III i Ir ■ II 1 II I II �� :i I I i t II f. �� I I it I.-, :1 BT,.,ne II II 1 r II 3 I' II 'I II II II i I \\C I I' , f I 1 I I I 1 4 M 1 I I ! ii o [ s1Z• Z I 1 o IT I _ 1 r2 1 1 \ 1 , R II II L N y N i.,'r gg i kW S< ! �� � ' C I E / A sa The_Bell/Espe Residence c,E Wedgewood Building Co.,LLC No Dele ,e.n t7t.> 524SA-Bell/Espe 32 First Street NE I Carmel IN 46032 CopPpM0 zozz Wetl,e„ooe euiuiny co.LLC. A O N NMI rawrvetl.This materiel may not M y+ BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE \,-. -_Ns „� 317.669.6300 rwrom,I reerveor moms ate.rcne,nm.e.pr... rirtyt npermisaronol Me"470Mker,. - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS WBC �'c,._�, www.wedoewoodbc.com parmi,y.n�.r.Kiocr,mpkip.etl,.,w.tle�.pm I r --1 Il H1.4 i, R a a 'E Pi V r 1111 ,, I a III VIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMI iliffilfillEK .,.. a , I I I ,i 1. i Ditii • 10 LAM= — J r1� S --- �� I * Ei I ,) r L' Jj , II 4 ; I 3: 1 J ,,L L,, 1, ., L. a i 1 1S a i1 1 . . i1 , 1 a I I a t I I I , I`I a o 1 1 I laiII ; ; II II p I s S1 I I!irr 1�— ---- -- t I - -- ri ai I.; I I� I .._ tli 3f I 11111, (i1 a aIII g?I II i I j ��� ll i• 51 I I L —I I--i- ^---g_. I0.i=ri---•--- - icJ- —.—. S I;. I. !�! --: jiil i i ; I',I �Iz J _ — 1iilxi `� J ' q a D Z .s r i O i Ili The Bell/Espe Residence mew a.. a� oo Wedgewood Building Co., LLC ».. o... o..va�,. g 524SA-Bell/Espe 3 0 32 First Street NE c.vvmMo aou w.eo.�.a Building Co.uc. 999$ Carmel,IN 46032 BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE �i. O onplls reserved es ve Thismod material e noNe eeleexpress _ �,�60.G 3 'wwe69 gewoodbc.Com o ._,c=.e�k�w.an:.�.ae om�FOUNDATION PLAN WgC ..m�..w�=.M i'...2 t<j< a L.L f O 11 y ) : ) { 11 . )) bm f / m ., c - _rno 1 2. m / -0 r? I/ <I> -.- . 111,i 1 .iey r 1: , ,. ..!, A _ _,„i ,._ . , ... ,. . .„4 .in,/,': ___-„.,„, h� of I •g �rf I, C m T r ,iier 0)1 i , .,,,,...„,,,,......, a. :" ,/ > I, ° EIS Z7 o,,, O iI=o V $ Tzit s0Ili � m � The Bell/Espe Residence Ew�� Wedgewood Building Co.,LLC IINR7. o.t. Description 524SA-BeIVEspe 3 0 32 First Street NE CocrmM o mu w.ao.wooa a,m�rn co.L�c. BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE . ° 317.66,IN 46032 Al riotH.maw*.This malarial may not t» __ _ 317.669.6300 r•proEu<W•ndfor modifi•E without Ma axpr•u www.wedaewoodbc.corn pnorrwitt•np•fmis•i•nottM1•<opyripNM1okb.Fx LOWER LEVEL ROUGH FRAMING WBC p•m..on<om.a p<.m«�w.ep.womx.<om / a '' oosseesreamat 14 _7 , ,„ ,..._ , ..„, , : § i , , ., . , , iii IC 4 ; t :ii • j3 4. t N ' T a n ' t --'`-• i ,, o T- s; ^i m 'a o-a y. va • 4 r. a J �,. k' k : 4m ' -- : / !II 4 _ c Fo a a � Mil S' 4 ... 55 aS ra;r- oft ,:,,,,j t4.''...,_:' N. A� aa...mbfiaeeo; I .e.�r.w,w �.,.�„-�,MNI,,,..., N. HT '>',� ` :' > ill Z 1 / d g.sII c� / I I i, Z a9 2, m OF 51? E° { it r.a The Bell/Es a- Residence pGEWp Wedgewood Re Building Co.,LLC N.. �. DeacHp.on 524SA-BeW 3� 0 Espe 32 First Street NE Copyright°2022 Wed.e,.00d Biskang co.uc. D ,.... j p Carmel,IN 46032 a rights dd ame nwrv.a.rn�a m.;•n,i m,y nnotb< BELL-ESPE RESIDENCE '' 317.669.6300 . .oau<• •n « mt.,a modified mt. •express � pd•r vm•n p•masaun o„ne oopynprx nob.,.Fw MAIN LEVEL ROUGH FRAMING WBCc�a www.wedtlewoodbacom p•m;•,p ,.. up„d,pk�edu. pdd<<om 9 N a 7, , 5 R 5 4,17 a 1 f \9 'rP•` iN • / *9 4 Y R 5 1 Bill - • \9 \ 1 go O r v/ 0 T \ r 40 / \ z ,2„ \q O • •Amgamil 0, F. TheBell/Espe Residence �oGEwpo Wedgewood Building Co., LLC Rev. ow D 524SA-eel 3 0 32 First Street NE Copy pM 0 3oY1 Wep•xooe 6 itloq Co.LLC. 3 '"" Carmel,IN 46032 Al rights reserved.rnr.',tetanal may not w CO BELL-ESPERESIDENCE +' ' 317.669.6300 tivr.e�.e•naro,moeir»a..nn.,nm...p... ROOF PLAN WBC Cy'cclu° WWW.wedgewoodbc.com °.,m written M.iooraacm.w,vynoMnoe.,on, eo•».•eec.com CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: PZ-2023-00002V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company, LLC Request: UDO Section 3.64 (C)(3) Maximum Parcel Coverage — Maximum 45% lot coverage allowed; requesting 49%lot coverage. FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of the requested variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The approval of the requested variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized floor plan and layout to accommodate this future owner's unique needs. The home design and footprint were designed to take into account the unique needs of the future owner. Development of the site will comply with all other required standards and requirements related to drainage and the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate development on the Real Estate for the construction of a custom residential home. The proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing and should not result in any negative impacts to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The use and value of the area adjacent to the real estate that is the subject of the requested variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the proposed use is a permitted use in the R-3 Residence zoning classification, the site will comply with all other required standards and requirements related to drainage and the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate its site development on the Real Estate for a custom residential home. The proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing; and, as a result, the requested variance should not have a substantially adverse impact on the use and value of the area adjacent to the subject Real Estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance results in practical difficulties in the use of the Applicant's site because: (i) the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized floor plan and layout to accommodate this future owner's unique needs and the home design and footprint were designed to take into the account the unique needs of the future Page 1 of 2 owner; (ii) development of the site will comply with all other required standards and requirements related to drainage; and (iii) the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate development on the Real Estate for a custom residential home. Due to the foregoing, absent approval of the requested variance pertaining to the maximum allowable percentage of parcel coverage, the Applicant will be substantially impacted on how it is able to utilize the Real Estate for the necessary design for the custom residential home for the unique medical needs of the future owner. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Cannel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. PZ-2023-00002 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this meeting,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 27th day of February,2023. BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBER, Cannel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Cannel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). Page 2 of 2 CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT—VARIANCE Docket No.: PZ-2023-00002V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company,LLC—530 2°d Avenue NE Request: UDO Section 2.12 Maximum Lot Coverage — The UDO standard requires a maximum of 45% lot coverage;the variance requests 49%coverage. 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 27d'DAY OF February,2023. Board Member CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL,INDIANA Docket No.: PZ-2023-00003 V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company,LLC Request: UDO Section 5.79 (J) Window Well Projections — Window wells may encroach up to 24" into a side yard; requesting 36"encroachment into west 5' wide side yard. FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of the requested variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The approval of the requested variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community regarding the lower-level basement windows and window wells. The design intention was to have wider window wells to meet egress requirements for the bedroom and exercise room (which could also function as a future bedroom). Further, the media room window well is the same as the others and its design was also intentional - to let in as much natural light into the space as possible, especially since this window is on the north facing side of the home. The home design footprint and therefore the position of the window wells were intended to take into account the unique needs of the future owner. The proposed custom home is well-designed and positioned in a manner that should not result in any negative impacts to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The use and value of the area adjacent to the real estate that is the subject of the requested variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the proposed use is a permitted use in the R-3 Residence zoning classification; the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate development on the Real Estate for a custom residential home; the proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing; and, as a result, the requested variance should not have a substantially adverse impact on the use and value of the area adjacent to the subject Real Estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance results in practical difficulties in the use of the Applicant's site because: (i) the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized single-story floor plan and site layout to accommodate this future owner's unique needs; (ii)the design intention for the lower-level basement windows and window wells was to have wider window wells to meet egress requirements for the bedroom and exercise room (which could also function as a bedroom); and (iii) the home design and footprint were intended to take into the account the unique needs of the future owner. Due to the foregoing, Page 1 of 2 absent approval of the requested variance pertaining to the window well encroachment, the Applicant will be substantially impacted on how it is able to utilize the Lot for the site layout necessary to construct a custom residential home to meet the unique needs of the future owner. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. PZ-2023-00003V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this meeting,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 27th day of February, 2023. BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). Page 2 of 2 CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT—VARIANCE Docket No.: PZ-2023-00003V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company,LLC—530 2°d Avenue NE Request: UDO Section 5.79 (J) Window Well Projections: The UDO standard requires a maximum of 24 inch projection into the required side yard; the variance requests a 36 inch projection. 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 27th DAY OF February,2023. Board Member CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL,INDIANA Docket No.: PZ-2023-00017 V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company, LLC Request: UDO Section 3.64 (C)(9) Minimum Roof Pitch — Minimum 8:12 roof pitch required; requesting 4:12 roof pitch. FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of the requested variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The approval of the requested variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized floor plan to accommodate this future owner's unique needs. The custom home was designed with a 4/12 roof pitch, which is appropriate and customary for a Prairie architectural style of the home. An 8/12 roof pitch would not be in keeping with the design spirit and intent of Prairie architecture and would not be an appropriate roof pitch for this style of home, as the roof would then overpower the home itself and the roof would become the most predominant architectural feature of the home — the element that the public would see most predominately when looking at the home from the street. Other Prairie style homes with a 4/12 roof pitch exist within the general vicinity of the Real Estate and the design of this proposed custom Prairie style residential home will be a complimentary addition to the area and will add to the architectural appeal of the streetscape by increasing the variety and diversity of architectural styles in the area. The proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing and should not result in any negative impacts to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The use and value of the area adjacent to the real estate that is the subject of the requested variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because the proposed use is a permitted use in the R-3 Residence zoning classification; the variance only requests the relief necessary to accommodate development for a custom residential home with an appropriate Prairie architectural design. The proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing; and, as a result, the requested variance should not have a substantially adverse impact on the use and value of the area adjacent to the subject Real Estate. Page 1 of 2 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Strict application of the Zoning Ordinance results in practical difficulties in the use of the Applicant's site because: (i) the proposed custom residential home has been designed to be handicap accessible, as one of the future owners has a medical condition that necessitates a specialized floor plan and layout to accommodate this future owner's unique needs; (ii) the custom home was designed with a 4/12 roof pitch, which is appropriate and customary for a Prairie architectural style of the home; (iii) if the roof pitch were 8/12, such a pitch would not be in keeping with the design spirit and intent of Prairie architecture and would not be an appropriate roof pitch for this style of home, as the roof would then overpower the home itself and the roof would become the most predominant architectural feature of the home — the element that the public would see most predominately when looking at the home from the street; (iv) other Prairie style homes with a 4/12 roof pitch exist within the general vicinity of the Real Estate and the design of this proposed custom Prairie style residential home will be a complimentary addition to the area and will add to the architectural appeal of the streetscape by increasing the variety and diversity of architectural styles in the area; (v) the home design and footprint were intended to take into account the unique needs of the future owner and the proposed custom home is well-designed, aesthetically and architecturally appealing. Due to the foregoing, absent approval of the requested variance pertaining to the roof pitch, the Applicant will be substantially impacted on how it is able to utilize the Real Estate for the necessary design for the custom residential home. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. PZ-2023-00017V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this meeting,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 27th day of February, 2023. BOARD OF APPEALS MEMBER, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). Page 2 of 2 CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT—VARIANCE Docket No.: PZ-2023-00017 V Petitioner: Wedgewood Building Company, LLC—530 2nd Avenue NE Request: UDO Section 3.64 (C)(9) Window Well Projections: The UDO standard requires a minimum 8:12 roof pitch;the variance requests a minimum 4:12 roof pitch. 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 27th DAY OF February, 2023. Board Member