Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact FINDINGS OF FACT -USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5+first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00006 SUA Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s)such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The project is consistent with the use of other similar structures and athletic fields already on site. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The project provides additional amenities and concessions with enhanced space, circulation and accessibility. The project includes upgrades to sidewalk access to the site, as well as improved on site circulation. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements and aesthetic features. The structures are located at sufficient distances from adjacent properties meeting zoning setbacks. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The project is consistent with the use of other similar structures and athletic fields already on site. The structures are in support of existing athletic fields, and need to be adjacent to the fields. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The architectural and engineering design follows zoning and drainage requirements. The project is consistent with the use of other similar structures and athletic fields already on site. DECISION IT IS THER FO E the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. PZI.0t,S0000c ,SU Pc is granted,subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this al 1 day of PAO.3fC`h , 20 IS . --- �� CHAT yERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals F. ?A/C/ S=(v TARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: documentl Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00007 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s)such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The lot coverage for hard surface already exceeds the maximum coverage. The addition of the proposed building structures will not be noticed due to landscape provisions along the perimeter of the property. Modifications to the detention basin to accommodate the increase in hard surface is proposed. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: Modifications to the existing detention basin to accommodate the increase in hard surface and storm water runoff to a reduced outflow from existing conditions is proposed. The addition of hard surface related to modifications to access paths and drives to improve safety and acessibility are proposed. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The increase in hard surface is negligible and located centrally with landscaping buffer zones. The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements and aesthetic features. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The site boundaries cannot be increased, with parking requirements dictating the current hard surface percentage. The structures are in support of existing athletic fields, and need to be adjacent to the fields. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The increase in hard surface is negligible and located centrally with landscaping buffer zones. There will not be an increase in traffic, as the use of these structures are an enhancement. DECISION IT IS THEREFFgRE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. Pz- 20?3 0000a V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.�/�j Adopted this 27 day of /"14121 , 20 CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals SEC'S ARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: document1 Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00008 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s)such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The building heights are consistent with the use of other similar structures associated with the adjacent stadium bleachers on site. The buildings are located centrally and in proportion to the existing stadium bleachers. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The locations of the buildings are centrally located with sufficient distances from public access paths. The buildings have been designed (architectural and engineering)appropriately for the proposed heights. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements and aesthetic features. The building heights are consistent with the other similar structures associated with the adjacent stadium bleachers on site and in proportion to the existing stadium bleachers. . 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The height of the Activity Center is dictated by the use as an indoor football facility. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The building heights are consistent with the other similar structures associated with the adjacent stadium bleachers on site and in proportion to the existing stadium bleachers. . DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. P - oa -ooao$1/ is granted,subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. 2 Adopted this 2'I day of ill Q �Jy1 k , 20 �C 3 CHAIRP RSON, Carm I Board of Zoning Appeals SEC TARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: document1 Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00009 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s)such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The building location was necessitated to minimize the disturbance to existing on-site athletic fields and infrastructure. The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements with respect to aesthetic features. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. Adjacent properties are not affected. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The building location was necessitated to minimize the disturbance to existing on-site athletic fields and infrastructure. Due to limited space on the site, the proposed setback is proposed. The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The structures are consistent with architectural design requirements and aesthetic features. DECISION � IS T E EFOORf the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. Z Z 2 3 - 0000' V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this Z 1 day of 1l'tY611 , 20 ,e3 CHAI';ERSON Carme Board of Zoning Appeals SET ETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: document1 Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00010 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The building location was necessitated to minimize the disturbance to existing on-site athletic fields and infrastructure. There will be landscape screening implemented. The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements with respect to aesthetic features. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The structures are consistent with architectural zoning requirements with respect to aesthetic features. Landscaping as buffer and foundation plantings will be implemented in addition to the existing perimeter landscape buffer. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The building location was necessitated to minimize the disturbance to existing on-site athletic fields and infrastructure. There will be landscape screening implemented. The setback to Keystone is to an elevated road/highway, thus not impacting visibility from the highway. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: Landscaping as buffer and foundation plantings will be implemented in addition to the existing perimeter landscape buffer. DECISION IT IS THEREFOIRE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. P7.102 3 —000l D is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made- a part hereof. i Adopted this 2 f day of AYak , 20 p?3 . CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals 14-' SEC ARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: document1 Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: Docket No. PZ-2023-00012 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. The area of the logo/sign is under the 300 square foot threshold. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The logo/sign is a familiar symbol associated and accepted by the high school. The design and installation will be sufficient to withstand code requirements. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The logo/sign is a familiar symbol associated and accepted by the high school. The design of the logo/sign and the building will be consistent with the aesthetics of the community. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. The area of the logo/sign is under the 300 square foot threshold. DECISION pzIT IS THEREF9RE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. r?02.3..000 it V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof., Adopted this 21 day of ' v`4vc L` , 20 23 CHAIRPERSON Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals S-AP ETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: documentl Rev.01/03/2022 FINDINGS OF FACT - USE VARIANCE CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1-5 + first 2 blanks) Docket No.: PZ-2023-00013 V Petitioner: Pete Rankovich 1. The grant of this variance will not be contrary to the public interest, due to the existence of special condition(s) such that enforcement of the Unified Development Ordinance will result in unnecessary hardship because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. 2. The grant of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The logo/sign is a familiar symbol associated and accepted by the high school. The design and installation will be sufficient to withstand code requirements. 3. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: The logo/sign is a familiar symbol associated and accepted by the high school. The design and installation will be sufficient to withstand code requirements. 4. The need for the variance arises from a natural condition peculiar to the subject property because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. 5. The granting of this variance does not substantially interfere with the Carmel Comprehensive Plan because: The proposed logo/sign is intended to be proportional in size to the existing bleachers and new building structures. DECISION IT IS THEREFO E the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Use Variance Docket No. P2'20 2 3--0003 V is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board,which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 2 f. 7 day of /"l `II , 20 2? CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals S ETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. Page 7 of 11 Filename: document1 Rev.01/03/2022