Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact ..v \ .- u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-32-0I Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGSOFFACT-DEVELOPMENTALSTANDARDSVARLANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: the buildin!! complies with all height. bulk and setback requirements of the B- 5 District. No changes in the width of the existing nonconformin!! lot (90 feet) will be made. The building addition for additional office use. at 2.200 square feet. is diminutive. Due to the low intensity of the use (offices). and size of the prooosed construction. a loading soace is unnecessary. Parking. in excess of Zonin!! Ordinance requirements. is provided on site and can accommodate easily any small delivery vehicles which occasionally may visit the real estate. 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: the buildin!! complies with all hei!!ht and setback requirements ofthe B-5 District. The width of the existin!! nonconformin!! lot will not be reduced and is similar to other lots along East Main Street. The low intensity of the prooosed office buildin!! and its small size do not create a need for a load in!! soace. Parking. in excess of Zonin!! Ordinance requirements (a total of 25 parking soaces proposed. 18 parkin!! spaces required). is provided on site and can accommodate easily any small delivery vehicles which occasionally may visit the real estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: no buildin!! additions or imorovements to the real estate would be ~ossible. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. day of 7JJ 2001. , armeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals SECRETARY, CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals Con itions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). "''':"_'0. u o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-32-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: the building complies with all heie:ht. bulk and setback requirements of the B- 5 District. No changes in the width of the existing nonconforming lot (90 feeO will be made. The building addition for additional office use. at 2.200 square feet. is diminutive. Due to the low intensity of the use (offices). and size of the proposed construction. a loading space is unnecessary. Parking. in excess of Zoning Ordinance reauirements. is provided on site and can accommodate easilv any small delivery vehicles which occasionally mav visit the real estate. 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: the building complies with all height and setback requirements of the B-5 District. The width of the existing nonconforming lot will not be reduced and is similar to other lots along East Main Street. The low intensity of the proposed office building and its small size do not create a need for a loading space. Parking. in excess of Zoning Ordinance requirements (a total of25 parking spaces proposed. 18 parking spaces required). is provided on site and can accommodate easily any small delivery vehicles which occasionally may visit the real estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: no building additions or improvements to the real estate would be possible. DATED THIS 7f DAY of dECISION .!Jf: . 2001. ~~, Board Member /J /' ~ ,~ u u CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-32-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application ofthe terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION DATED THIS 2-~ ~ . 2001. DAY of -' Q~ -- Board Member 6.---.'--"''"-....1. u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-32-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION DATED TIllS c;( q U DAY of /Jlay . 2001. Board Member ---:-~. u u J CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-32-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DATEDTlllS C1 t' DAY of DECISION Vn~ ,2001. a~. p-' Board Member w LB... Q (;) CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-33-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OFFACT-DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDSVARLANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: the building complies with all height. bulk and setback requirements of the B- 5 District. No changes in the width of the existing nonconfonhing lot (90 feet) will be made. The building addition for additional office use. at 2.200 SQuare feet. is diminutive. Due to the low intensity of the use (offices). and size of the proposed construction. a loading space is unnecessary. Parking. in excess of Zoning Ordinance requirements. is provided on site and can accommodate easily anv small delivery vehicles which occasionally mav visit the real estate. 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: the building complies with all height and setback requirements of the B-5 District. The width ofthe existing nonconforming lot will not be reduced and is similar to other lots along East Main Street. The low intensity of the ~roposed office building and its small size do not create a need for a loading space. Parking. in excess of Zoning Ordinance requirements (a total of 25 parking spaces proposed. 18 parking spaces required), is provided on site and can accommodate easilv anv small delivery vehicles which occasionallv may visit the real estate. 3. The strict application of the terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: no building additions or improvements to the real estate would be possible. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. day of /JJ~ .2001. 1\ SECRETARY, CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). r__~ --'" o Q CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-33-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DATEDTIllS a 9 DAY of DECISION 22lar~ Board Member .--~ u Q CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-33-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value ofthe area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application ofthe terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DATED TillS ~( DAY of DECISION JAi-f . 2001. ~cY -------- Board Member ....~ o (j CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-33-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The approval ofthis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: the building complies with all heie:ht. bulk and setback requirements ofthe B- 5 District. No changes in the width of the existine: nonconforming lot (90 feet) will be made. The building addition for additional office use. at 2.200 square feet. is diminutive. Due to the low intensity of the use (offices). and size of the proposed construction. a loading space is unnecessary. Parking. in excess of Zonine: Ordinance reauirements. is provided on site and can accommodate easily any small delivery vehicles which occasionally may visit the real estate. 2. The use or value of the area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: the building complies with all heie:ht and setback requirements of the B-5 District. The width of the existing nonconformine: lot will not be reduced and is similar to other lots along East Main Street. The low intensity of the proposed office building and its small size do not create a need for a loading space. Parking. in excess of Zoning Ordinance reauirements (a total of25 parking spaces proposed. 18 parking spaces required). is provided on site and can accommodate easilv any small delivery vehicles which occasionally may visit the real estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: no building additions or improvements to the real estate would be possible. DATED TillS ;;z.~ DAY of .,/ YECISION ~7 .2001. ~--; Board Member -- ~~ u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: V-33-01 Petitioner: Charan Ahluwalia FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use or value ofthe area adjacent to the subject property will not be substantially affected in any adverse manner because: 3. The strict application ofthe terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION DATEDTHIS d1 DAY of