The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFindings of Fact SUA-2-01 ""I 0,: U CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA 1':, Docket No.: SUA-2 -01 Petitioner: Carmel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and aU:prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: a review of the applicable FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and CarmeVClay Comprehensive Plan because: the site design: architectural designs and details: and scale of the addition have been developed in order to complement the existing facility and character of the surrounding area. 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: the expansive site accommodates the building addition and required additional off-street parking while maintaining open space and landscaped areas. The scale and architecture complements both the existing facility and is of a style and Quality to complement and enhance the surrounding area. 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: adequate off-street parking and landscaping are provided. The site design and architecture employed in the addition maintain and enhance the character of the long-time religious use and provide a stable anchor for the community. The Special Use (church) acts as an appropriate transitional use between Commercial uses planned and zoned along Range Line Road. and residential planned and zoned to the east of the facility. 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: water. sewage and storm facilities are all presently available and exist on site. The improvements planned are designed to ensure that these facilities will continue to function appropriately. Additional off-street parking is being provided not only to replace those lost to the building addition. but to provide the additional off-street parking required by the addition itself. No new curb-cuts or access points are being created or requested by this expansion. 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Special Use Docket is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. 2:> dayof ilp,.; ( ,2001. --o~ ./ ~~. ~ :~=~. ----......, . kU . // Conditions of the Board are 1fsted on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). SEC~ ARY. can;;z;;:;;:;:ning Appeals ~/a?d2' . c:.-- ::ODMA\MHODMA\INIMAN2;524298; I ., y i~ 'I u o CARMELlCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: SUA-2-01 Petitioner: Cannel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OFF ACT - SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) I. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Pennitted Land Use of the zoning district and Cannel/Clay Comprehensive Plan because: 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or stonn drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not fmd that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DATED THIS ~'"5 DECISION DAY of ~ ,2001. ::ODMA IMHODMA 1lNIMAN2;S24302; 1 ... / /' / 't o Q j'" CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: SUA-2-01 Petitioner: Carmel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and Carmel/Clay Comprehensive Plan because: 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: S. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not fmd that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DATED THIS d3 DAYOf~ DECISION \. ::ODMA\MHODMA\lNIMAN2;524302; I /. / .- 'l u Q j" CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: SUA-2-01 Petitioner: Carmel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and Carmel/Clay Comprehensive Plan because: . 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DECISION DATEDTHIS ~~~ DAYOf_~ , 2001. ~~~~ Boar Member : :ODMA \MHODMA \INIMAN2;S24302; 1 -,--- . \ . \ V 1'" -; u (;) CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: SUA-2-0 1 Petitioner: Cannel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Pennitted Land Use of the zoning district and CarmeVClay Comprehensive Plan because: 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or stonn drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance Z-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DECISION DATED THIS p~ DAY of ~'-' , 2001. ~.~ Board Member ~ ::ODMAIMHODMA\INIMAN2;S24302; I .. ~ v ~ o o ;'- CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: SUA-2-01 Petitioner: Carmel United Methodist Church FINDINGS OF FACT - SPECIAL USE (Ballot Sheet) 1. The Special Use in Flood Plain District, Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.6 as amended does not apply and all prerequisites have been met by Petitioner as verified by: 2. The Special Use will be consistent with the Character and Permitted Land Use of the zoning district and CarmeVClay Comprehensive Plan because: 3. The Special Use is physically suitable for the land in question because: 4. The Special Use will not injuriously or adversely affect the adjacent land or property values because: 5. The Special Use will not adversely affect vehicular or pedestrian traffic flow, nor the adequate availability of water, sewage, or storm drainage facilities, or police or fire protection because: 6. The Board has reviewed the requirements of Ordinance 2-160, Section 21.3 (1-25) as they relate to this Special Use, and does not find that those criteria prevent the granting of the Special Use. DATED THIS ~ 3 DECISION DAYOf{JF ,2001. ( f)~ ,J/l .0/7 ~ -, I / 7f1,f{1{tt>2.? J4:tL:~ Board Member ::ODMA IMHODMA \INlMAN2;S24302; 1