HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
~
~.
v
Petitioner:
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
~ra.INDIANA
~. V-39'-O~
Ci ty of Camel and Kensington Partners
Docket No.:
FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and generai welfare of the
community because;
'!he existing tcMn hares and vacant lots do not encroach up:m any other
property. All existing utility easenents ranain unchanged. '!he Kensington
Place Replat of nr+nher. 2000 reduced the building lots fran 22 to 19.
creating IOClre green space than that of the originally approved plat. An
easement on lDt 10 has been recx>rded for Kensington Place residents to
access ~adowlark Park.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
There is no encroachne1t involved to any property adjacent to Kensington PlaCe.
The variances requested for catq)liance and consistency only affect the
property in Kensinqton Place. There is no encroachment of any lot upon any
other lot in Kensington Place. Adjacent properties have not been adversely
affected fer twelve years.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
ThiI:teen (13) tCMn hares have been built and one (1) lot with footings 1='Oured
since 1989. It would not be practical to destroY these e.xistinq structures.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance
Docket No. V- 38-01 and V-39-01 are. granted, subject to any conditions stated i~ the minutes of this
Board. which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
~3
.2001
SECRETARY. Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals '-f r.~()fJ A ll...f1J/?\. . 't-7' ~ .
Conditions of the Board are Iist~~~~er or his representative to sign)
s: \carmelc:laY'arduseregs\cnec:l<hst\devstandapp
Revised 1 OI~ 7/2000
P~. l! 0/8 - 08\'lllapmenl8t StaItll8rcll vananc:e AWIcaUon
w
u
-;
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No. :
Petitioner:
V-38-01 and ~39-01
~i ty of ('~nrl=!l ;md Kensington Partners
FINDINGS Of FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet>
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS 23rd
DAY OF April
,2001
l)6~
a~,
Page 1 0111- ~t" SlanQarlla V8n.- ApgIlcallcn
w
o
;
Docket No. :
Petitioner:
r; t-'1 of ("~nr.p-l and Kensington Partners
FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS
23rd
DAYOF April
.2001
B~~~"':<~
Pallll 7 0111- ~~ Slanclarda V8nence ApofIcatlcn
I
w
Q
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No. :
V-38-01 and ~39-01
Petitioner:
c:i T':j of ("AnTAl and Kensington Partners
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS
23rd
DAYOF April
,2001
~~~~
Board Member
PIlllll 701 8 - ~!8I Slanclatcle V8n.nce Appllcatlon
..
u
u
:;.
CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel. Indiana
Docket No. :
Petitioner:
V-38-0l and V-39-0l
('; t~ of C"AYTrAl and I(@nsinqton Partners
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet>
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS 23rd
DAY OF April
Page 70/ 11- ~!.. 518_ VIIn.nce Appilcallcn