HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
06/27/2001 17:32
HAMILTON CO USDA~
PAGE 01/03
l:
1108 SOllth 9th Strut
IJIISV/lle, JIV'~6()6()"JUJ
Ph. (3't1) 773-1432
Fax (317) 776-1 lOt .
Dl'afnags, Erosion and Sediment Control Plan
Tecbnlca1Ilevlcw and O>mment
.~~ Sub'
~\.~~. ~
-~~~
96 lit SYJPG~-r PJ(DFI!SS(~~AL '~PJ{.
. 7Jt~H~' tJGTDH 8LJ1Lf)IN~ t':.t'JIP. . /<~,/.4R- ~.8B ~.
7130 LAAlre~N ~D. ~a., 6AAnl ~ DRlv~
:Z;/'/ fJ /A NA PtJU{ -r-AI CA~/'fe~ ;r JJ ~'o"z..
"t.~ ,tp
tt, - I~ .'
~By: .-IOHH Q. SOOTh' e..,..
Plan Review Procedure: Site Visit Date:
Location: ~. s~.lJ4' ~ ~A;N'LJAI.J.. .D,nuE
Lepl Description: . 5€C. B
TOWDSbip: /7#'
.
Plan Reyiew Date: -3-8e z~1- 1..-.2 7~61
Range:
'IE,
. . Civil ToWnship: c~r
121. tec1irrlcb1.revw qnjl CDIntIt4llll are iiftentld tD evalu.aU tlJS CIJlIfp/ldtJM.u ofh PM/on tlIId sediment r;Dntrol
.rp/tln.~ tTiTJ'p1'oftcL n. e1WIon and sedimeItl ~ntTtJl plan subm/tt<<l W4f Mt rrMwedlOl' tlul ~ of the
~~~ .mprlJl:t/~ ~nduJ.eJ in 1M plan. tIS wU tJf tho.r~ reQmm~ In ih4 ~mmenU s"OII/d he
eN71UJ:lJ11d ~ tc> iJlidr let#iDilily by a ~al!fied f1lJlivldwl With srrudurat p,.tIClic4s dIlSlgned by a qualified cngiMlJ'.
17le pltm 1u81,t(Jt ~ reviewed for l(,)CQl, state. or fWlraI pumib iMt may h, retJIlired 10 prixe.ed with this
ptV(1jed. .A.di/itiDrulIn.fQ1'lllflti.on. including dull" calculmions may be ~ed to.fi:trlJw' ~aluate the erosIon
~~pli:rn. . ,
n.e erOsion lUld.sedimeut coatroj plaD bas ~ revjewed. and ~.has been ~ that the plaD:
o Satbfiesth~:mJnimUUlTcquircments.an~ intent o!327IAC IS-S (Rule 5). NotificatioD wlU be forwarded
to the ID.diaoa De.pattI;Q.cnt of Environmental'Management
cots section for additional iDfonnatiOl1.
Does n~t sa~(y the mum requirements and intent 0(.327IAC 1 S-S (Rule'S); defICiencies are noted in
the check:1JSt an . the comments section. Oeficiencies constitute potential violation oCtile ride and must
y addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies mU5t be
submi~: . Please address revisions (0 the reviewer.
ProJHll'implemenlalion of the t!.I"osion and sedimtu'; c01flrol plan tITId ;1UpecliolU'ofthe cOlUlrflction site by tlie
d~oper or Q repi'esenJativ4 are MJ:ellQry to minimize ojf-site sedim.mation.. The developer shtJuld be OWQ1'tl.
tMt rqiforeseen constnieJiiJn etMtiu and well/her conditions may q{<<:t ~ puformance 01 Q practlc. or (II.
erosl~ tl1td sediment cOhh'Ol plan.. The plan must be ajlc:ible dOCll1tle1fI, with provisions 10 modify or svbs/ltule
practices as trCtIUStlI)I. .
86/27/2881 17:32 317-77F-11B1
U
PROJBCT: "It sl-. rJ!O~ fA2/(
Page:Z ~
HAMIL TON CO USDAO
PAGE 82/03
.ARE 'tIlE Wu.oWING rrEMS ADEQUATELY ADDBESSED OM TIlE PLANS T
(.4ll PIas Mrt# llU:buJ4ApproprUr14 lAg" SM/b" - North kntw)
~t/JfIllIH NtftAppUctz/Jk UI this Pn1je.d ~ ~ q NA)
Yes No PROJECrINF'O~nON
~ 0 l,A Project Location Map (Show project in ~Mf 10 odret-~ oftM eofmJJl)
III d IB Nanatlve n.rlblJlg dae Natan: and PurpoM of the Projeet
f!I 0 Ie Location orPluuaed and/or EJUdng Roads, UCWda, Stn1ct.a~ Blgbw&)'S, de.
" 0 ID Lot u.d/or BalldiDz LoeatiODl
~ 0 IE LudaJe of AdJaceDt Areas
(SMw tlrd Entire Up~ fYarlfnhed tmd Mjtl.cmrAtwa.r Within $00 Fed olth4 ProJ1flrlY Una)
Yes No TOPOGRAPRIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
. o~lJ ~ 2A EJiIdag Vegetadon (11l.rlb IIlJIi DeIlnear,)
.~ ~ II %B Locadol1lU1d Name of AU Wetlands, Lakes Pel Water Q)urtet Oil aDd AdJaetIlt to die Site
D~ ~ IBI 2C' 100 Year F1ooc1plaWt P100dway FrlIIges, aDd Jl1oo4,.-ayI (J(ou Ui/on.) 5' ~ fA.} If!' l~tJtI ~'iJk.s /
," , 1!I m SoUl Intormatioll (Qlrytlric mils ~ pratIftl. it 16."'" ~/litY ofrh4 (MlmlllflHlloperlo
~ the f1d,Jtmu o/wlll11tIb antl to obtain ,..""afr.r1trl tM91fOIrftltagawnmfnl QfnfJIcrJ
III 0 2.1: . lt~. ad PI..... CoD-man. IIlllderval Apptopriafe to Iadlcate Dnbaage Patterat
iii [] 2Il' Locati.- 01 SpedfIc Polllts Where StOl'lllwater'PIIdauJe ~ Leaw the Site
(J 0 2G J4eIlCIf)t All ~ Wakn ('1lJUt:/uDp i.J.fIl1 cr~1bnIdptIl St<mfI s-r, lMtttIJY rhs
NtIIIIe 0/" MlmldplJl OJ-atur'" ths Ultbtt4* lWIIIvhtg ".,..,
[], 1I m PotenCial Ara8 Whea'e Storm..... May 1tttter Groaaclwaer (Note I/IIOM)
II 0 21 LocatIon of ~tol'lllWater System (btclue CvIHt1.6, StvnII Scwft. CMnn'ell. tIIItl Swier)
Yes . No LAND DISTURBING ACI'lVlTIES
tl lllI 3A Locatioa cd Apprulmate DldleadODl of An DIIla.'thd Areal [I.... c-.If'llCd'CIII Lbrrit.rJ
b~ ,r ~ WIan ,.~ Ccw.r WiIlIhPtwl1l'Htl$Jullll4 NCJ.r6I~
tI 3. Soil Stockpiles ael or BorroW Areal (ShIN LocaIU:1nI Of' Note ifNaM)
Yes 'No EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Ir. D 4A SequeIlce of Whea Eacb l'tfe&ldl'e wm Be ImpJemeatal (Rd:rtIw to &rtli Distxri1ing Aclivitia)
III 0 4B Ma.niCoriDz and Mahateiwlce Galdelb1eot tOt Each Measure
[J H .4C PerImeter Sediment Control Malara (lAf:;4tlon. CGnnrtrdiGn Ddtd/. Ditrutulmu, tIIftl Sp<<:(fkItIlkInI)
, 0 4lJ TelDporary ~ (Sp<<I/I<<lItmu: r"cluing &. ~ Fmlltur. LIme. tlIId MJdeh kw)
~ 0 4E T~poraty Efo$iOIl and SeclImaIt Coatrol Me&RU'e't
(l,o<<ditm. CAtr#nterlGn DeltJil. Dinu!tuI(Jff4. antl Sp<<:lftaztloru)
.LI 0 4ll', PenIwaeDt EI"OSiol1lJlcl SecllmeDt CoatI"OI MC8IIIRI
..
g 0 (l.ActIJion. CorrsrrvctiGn DetDil. ~. anti SpeiftCtltloru)
4G storm DI'IiIt lillet Protecdoa (/AcIltIMI. OJruI1w:don DfIIIIl, DinrllUloru, and Specff1ctlliOll3)
0 III 4B S.rmwUer 0utId Protec:tiOD (z.o::atian. Cor"'rrlt:IiGn Ddml. DitrUlMIGnI. qnJ $JIfJd/kati()lll)
. 0 41 Stable CoutnlctiOD Entranee (lAcalion. Con.rtnu:rion DdDiI, ~oru. tI.1ttl Spt1dfit:tllloru)
D HfA 0 4J ErosioD and Secllmat eontrvl on IDdMdall BaPcIiJlI Loll (Speifit:lJtiaM)
IJI 0 4K Perauuaaat seedb. (Spcifi<<llt<<u: 11It:/wllrlg s.J Ai&. Fwfl/Jpr. LIm., OIId.UfIk:h Pat.tu)
~-4/97
06/27/2001 17:32
317-77F-1.101
U
H~MILTON CO USD~
PAGE 03/03
RRO~TON AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
. COMMENTS
Project; ,t. .,. srbEr f~OFlssiuv"'-L f'~
Page 3 of Z.
Nole: Ail uOIIQn and ,editnent cont1'ol measures shoWl't on the plans and refennced III this review mUll 1IIt81 the
design Cflterkl, lIa11dardJ, and Ipecf/icaJiotrJ OUIlineJ in the "Indiana HandbooJclor Erosion Control in
Dev~lf)plhg AfeM;' frf)m 1M IndiClllrt Deparlmr:nJ 01 Natural RUOUTCU, Divaion olSoi! Ct;lMfI!n1ati(ln (IT IPnilm-
Gu/danc,B DoctilllUUfb. '.
t. ~~,.I ~1'- LI!V~SE tJrrAIJ. Zkr.' 7d~ ru~F&~.~1' rN'E
t:!8#c:Z~re ,~/) IE I.e/,JEL I.eN"'# r//e ~U /.Nt/uT.
,
.2. rJI! s.'k 'I"J.""c~ 1J16~ ~,J~ ~~''si~, ~~.k ~LJlk,(
~ Id,'// */IXl, 50./"" ~
3. $;'/II)~i&e. ,"$ ;e~~M~~;;~~ A/~ ~rl-L </UlSf ~tI ~,ult $'~,
.
(l:i1ftXJ(
l.
Emsi~Lt. 1:.O....4~c #'i~ c~a~je; to CQ/~e.J ~ tl4.4. So;-( +-
\Jt:..Jc,r CDloUeIVJi'b..... J::>....S fn0-:
'Z..sH~c.O ~~~~~ ~;If Pe~e a.~ rrfl.;~-rC .....j /0 hI ~1''''--h.,..tA&iJ.
;. : ~iil7-::t./:~t-;;;<~~t ~:W~~;7
+;r......'''j ~ ~ e,,..-.../ ~,~e..k .
cc: .I..I,;I~
~s..c~s
r;k
Q
u
.!:!.!!!P, Laurence M
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lillig, Laurence M
Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:32 PM
Hill, Dick B; Dobosiewicz, Jon C
RE: 96th Street Professional Park
Dick,
If there was any input from the Plan Commission re: accel/decel, I don't recall it. As a matter of fact, I don't know that the
issue would ever have been raised, since at the time they were considering the plat, there was no plan proposed for Block
A. If there was any comment, I suspect it would center around the impact on the existing street trees.
I can't imagine why the residents of Williamson Run would object to improvements that would make traffic on Randall
Drive flow more smoothly.
----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Dick B
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Lillig, Laurence M; Dobosiewicz, Jon C
Subject: 96th Street Professional Park .
Three entrances? When was that decided? Was that decided?
If you'd like, I'll raise the question of the accel/decellanes at the meeting tonight.
Laurence
Adam DeHart was in today asking if we had major issues remaining after his response to our T.A. C. comments.
Adam indicated that he was on the BZA agenda tonite and wanted to be aware of any issues. Kate has not reviewed
his letter or revised drawings. I did look at both today. The only major issue I see regards Kate's request for
accel/decellanes to be provided at the entrance to this development. Adam's response was that the traffic impact
analysis for the 96th Street Auto Park did not warrant the installation of accel/decellanes for the three proposed
Randall Drive Entrances for the office park in Block "A". He also verbally indicated the Williamson Run residents
objected to them and Plan Commission?? did not require or want them. I am not sure if he said Plan Commission.
At any rate, Kate had to leave early and has not been able to respond. Do either of you have any recollections or
comments regarding this issue, one way or another?
1
u
u
'" Lilli , Laurence M
~ From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Lillig, Laurence M
Tuesday, May 29, 2001 6:38 PM
Hill, Dick B
RE: 96th Street Professional Park
Dick,
The plat sets Randall Drive within a 52-foot-wide right-of-way. Whether that's enough to accommodate accelJdecel, I'll let
you and Kate be the judges. I'll see if I can get the mothion contingent on outstanding TAC concerns.
Laurence
-----Original Message-----
From: Hill, Dick B
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Lil/ig, Laurence M
Subject: RE: 96th Street Professional Park
I talked to Adam. He stated that Williamson run objected to accelJdecellanes due to the loss of street trees. I
misunderstood. He said that was the only objection other than the fact that the accelJdecellane issue had never been
raised until Kate's request He said it never came up during plat review. I told him that this would probably not be a
plat issue. Also told him that this was not an unusual request from our department, particularly for a platted
development According to Adam, there is not enough existing r.o.w. to accomodate accelJdecellanes and additional
right of way requirements would probably affect his parking requirements. Adam indicated he would be willing to meet
with Kate to work this out, prior to requesting BPW approval. I did not address the three entrance issue.
---Original Message---
From: Lil/ig, Laurence M
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 4:32 PM
To: Hill, Dick B; Dobosiewicz, Jon C
Subject: RE: 96th Street Professional Park
Dick,
If there was any input from the Plan Commission re: accelJdecel, I don't recall it As a matter of fact, I don't know
that the issue would ever have been raised, since at the time they were considering the plat, there was no plan
proposed for Block A If there was any comment, I suspect it would center around the impact on the existing
street trees.
I can't imagine why the residents of Williamson Run would object to improvements that would make traffic on
Randall Drive flow more smoothly.
Three entrances? When was that decided? Was that decided?
If you'd like, I'll raise the question of the accelJdecellanes at the meeting tonight.
Laurence
----Original Message-
From: Hill, Dick B
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 20014:01 PM
To: Lil/ig, Laurence M; Dobosiewicz, Jon C
Subject: 96th Street Professional Park
Adam DeHart was in today asking if we had major issues remaining after his response to our TA C.
comments. Adam indicated that he was on the BZA agenda tonite and wanted to be aware of any issues.
Kate has not reviewed his letter or revised drawings. I did look at both today. The only major issue I see
regards Kate's request for accelJdecellanes to be provided at the entrance to this development. Adam's
response was that the traffic impact analysis for the 96th Street Auto Park did not warrant the installation of
accelJdecellanes for the three proposed Randall Drive Entrances for the office park in Block "A". He also
verbally indicated the Williamson Run residents objected to them and Plan Commission?? did not require or
want them. I am not sure if he said Plan Commission.
1
u
u
At any rate, Kate had to leave early and has not been able to respond. Do either of you have any recollections
or comments regarding this issue, one way or another?
2
,..-
f\
Q
KEELER -WEBB ASSOGIATES
"U
:t
1~,-f
. r'r'( / .,r
~(f
/
Consulting Engineers' Planners' Surveyors
TELEPHONE (317) 574-0140 . FAX (317) 574-1269
486 GRADLE DRIVE
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
May 22, 2001
Mr. Scott Brewer
Urban Forester
CITY OF CARMEL
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
Re.: _JlS1ffieftiIm5feS's.iQftatEmifk
9750 - 9760 Randall Drive
Indianapolis, Indiana
KWA Project No.: 0102-019
RESPONSE LETTER
This response letter is based on your review letter dated May 1, 2001. The following
items directly correlate with your letter and these revisions and comments have been
made to the construction documents which are attached:
1. Additional detail has been added to the Landscape Plan to reflect the right-of-
way width and location of 70' pedestrian/vehicle ingress/egress and utility
easement, 25' drainage and utility easement and the 20' sanitary sewer
easement. The sidewalk has been located in such a manner that it will not
interfere with the existing Oak trees along the east side of Randall Drive. This
area is busy with different utilities and the overall new plantings have been
positioned in such a manner that they will be located near the parking lot and
not directly over most of the utilities within these easements.
2. Air conditioner condenser units and electrical transformers have been shown
on the Landscape Plan.
3. The column on the side of plantings has been revised per your
recommendations. Additional note, No.6 was added in regards to planting
conforming with the American Standards of Nursery Stock. All shade and
I
Indianapolis, IN. Chicago, IL. St. Louis, MO . Cincinnati, OH. Henderson, KY. Jacksonville, FL
A'
"
w
w
'1
ornamental trees shall be 2" caliper and revised per note on tree and platning
shrub schedule.
4. Malus White Angel Crab Apple has been changed to a Malus David Flower
Crab Apple.
5. A revision has been made to the ground sign elevation to reflect the plantings
as noted on the plan view around the sign.
6. Two additional notes have been added to the Planting details for trees and
shrubs. Additionally, the comment in regards to drainage and eliminating the
settling of plants has also been changed on the detail.
If you have any questions or comments in regards to this project, please do not hesistate
to contact our office at any time.
Attached for your review is one additional set of the Landscape Plans which reflect all of
the above request for change or comments.
Respectfully,
KEELER-WEBB ASSOCIATES
~ ~..UJ-
Adam DeHart, LS
Project Manager
ALD:mv./
enclosure
2
KEELER-WEBB ASSOC1l\.TES
Consulting Engineel t
486 Gradle Drive ~..
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
(317) 574-0140
Fax (317) 574-1269
[1rnvTI{.....j @[? v~~@[tYi]OVV&[1
TO......"""""..
DEPAR'lMENT OF COMMUNITY SERvr
JOB NO.
2001
0102-019
Sue Ellen Jolmson
One Civic Square
Cannel, Indiana 46032
96th Street Professional Park
Indianapolis, Indiana
WE ARE SENDING YOU D Attached
D Under separate cover via
delivery
the following items:
>
o Shop drawings
o Prints
o Plans
o Samples
o Specifications
o Copy of letter
o Change order
o
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 5/21/01 15 BZA Packets
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
o For approval 0 Approved as submitted
o For your use 0 Approved as noted
> o As requested 0 Returned for corrections
o For review and comment 0
o FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
o Resubmit
copies for approval
o Submit
copies for distribution
o Return
corrected prints
o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
COpy TO
SIGNED:
Adam DeHart, LS
~'l
If enclosures are not as noted. kindly notify us at once.
o
u
Dobosiewicz, Jon C
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Lillig, Laurence M
Saturday, May 19, 2001 10:38 AM
Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Hollibaugh, Mike P
John R. Molitor (E-mail)
East 96th Street Auto Park, Block A~
Informational packets were not received by the Department by close of business on Friday, May 18, 2001. I think we
should recommend that this Item be tabled to the June 25, 2001, meeting of the BZA for that reason.
Plans revised per T AC comments have not been submitted. Of specific concern to the Department are:
The dumpster at the north end of the project needs to be pulled out of the 50-foot landscaping strip. This can
easily be accomplished by eliminating 2 - 4 spaces at the north end of the parking lot. At present the plan calls for 101
parking spaces where only 81 are required, therefore no parking problem results from this action.
A sidewalk needs to be installed on the east side of Randall Drive from the south line of Williamson Run
Subdivision to a point between 660 and 670 feet south. We are not requiring them to install the sidewalk on the west side
of the street at this time (we'll have that installed when the property to the west develops), nor are we requiring them to
bring the sidewalk all the way down to 96th Street at this time - preferring to have it installed when the south half of Block A
develops so that it isn't damaged during construction. A connector walk into the site needs to be installed at the curb cut,
too.
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Phone: 317.571.2417
Fax: 317.571.2426
llillig@d.carmel.in.us
1
~.
.
u u
City of Carmel
",j-c'7j"<',
(_~~Of 4~~':..
:,~' ~',\
..'..' u...... c... (' \\
; *,.w,1 ^~ ",~ .,* ':{:
"~:; ~~Q'l:~'
-. "11?, _ ~"
'<'-'/(,7'ON c():!.!'
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
Mr. Adam DeHart. LS
Keeler-Webb Associates
486 Gradle Drive
Carmel, IN 46032
~ 8
~
,jJtcttlttJ
~..
'May 3,2001
RE: 96th Street Professional Park
t:~ 9(p 'T1( rr. -4'ttpC} .~ K; 6LI<' 4,
Dear Mr. DeHart
We apologize for the delay in reviewing this pr~iecl. We offer the following comments:
GENERAL
I. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits,
2. JURISDICTIONS:
. Streets (Randall Road) - City of Cannel
. Water - Indianapolis Water Company service area
. Sanitary Sewers - City of Cannel Wastewater Utility
. Storm Sewers/Stonn Drainage - City of Cannel
3. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS AND SAFETY APPROY ALS
. Commercial Curb Cut/Temporary Construction Entrance - The feller of requeslto the Board
should include an 8 Y2 x 11 exhibit which shows the entrance, drive width, overall drive width at
the edge of pave men I. radii. right of way line(s) and right of way dimension and any other
information pertinent to the requesl.
. Sanitary Sewer Availability - The leller of request to the Board should include an itemized listing
of the buildings, their size in total square feet per building and the intended use of the building.
. Irrigation System in Right of Way or Dedicated Easement - We note a water line labeled for use
for an irrigation system. If any portion of the irrigation system is installed in a dedicated
casement, a Consent to Encroach Agreement will be required. This Agreement requires Board
apprO\'al. Likewise, if the irrigation system is installed in dedicated right of way, Board approval
is required. Any other permanent fixture installed in the right of way or dedicated casement will
~.;~\i~iirc si:r:iLir tI\',~H:nC;l: ::nd ;l;';pro\::.d::
I am enclosing a schedule of Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines for
your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board,
Any submission to the Board requires prior final approval by the Carmel Clay Plan Commissiol/ amI/or
the Board ofZollillg Appeals ami cOlI/pletioll of reviell' by the Techllical Advisory COII/II/ittee. All
written requests to be placetl on the Board'.'; agellda must illclude the appropriate tlocket IIumbers alld
the date (or date.\) of approval by the Plan Commission amI/or BZA.
4. SANIT ARY SEWER A Y AILABILlTY (ACREAGE) AND CONNECTION FEES
. Availability (acreage) Fees are based upon tOlal acreage (legal description required) :"{t $1 ,J()5.00
per acre for sanitary sewer. However. the A\'ailability (acreage) Fees for the entire parcel known
as the 96th Street Auto Park were p:lid previously, Therefore, no additional A vailabilily Fees will
be required to be paid for this deyelopmenl.
o Conneclion Fees are based upon the average lIser factor tables from Sectionl}-200 (sanitary) of
our Utility Ordinance. The Connection Fees are $795.00 per EDU for sanitary sewers. The office
e1assification frolllthe Ordinance is 0.5 EDUs per 1,000 square feet of office space, According to
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2441
..,
u
u
Mr. Adam DeHart
May 3,2001
Page 2
the plans and commentary, this development consists of two office buildings, each containing
12.146 square feet. Therefore:
24.292 total square feet @ 0.5 EDUsll,OOO square feet = 12.146 EDUs
12.146 EDUs @ $795.00 per EDU = $9,656.00 Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees.
Any (leviation from the Connection Fee calculations listed in our Ordinance will require
Carmel Utilities approval ami recommem/tdion to the Boardfor approval.
5. T.A.c. REVIEWIDRAWINGS SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL
We request all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing and be
accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for
construction until all issues have been resolved. All Cannel Utility issues must also be resolved. The
design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. This office will require a
minimum of four-sets of approved drawings after all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be
stamped approved and signed by the City Engineer and the Director Cannel Utilities. The
Developer/Owner will receive one-set which must be maintained on the construction site at all times.
Carmel Utilities will receive one-sel. Our Public Works Inspector will receive one-set and one-set will
be maintained in the Department of Engineering. If more than four-sets are requested to be approved,
the additional sets must be submilled with the required four-sets.
6. Carmel Utilities docs not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted direclIy for all sanitary
sewer locates.
7. Carmel Utilities will provide a separate review of this pr~ject for sanitary sewer issues.
8. I am enclosing copies of the followirg with this correspondence.
. Commercial Project Approval Procedures
. Subdivision Project Approval Procedures (this is a commercial subdivision)
. Performance Release Procedure
. Permit Data, Contacts, etc.
. Sewer Permit Requirements
. Commercial Permilling Procedures
I will send a copy of our Residential Subdivision and Commercial Irrigation System Requirements
upon rcquest.
9. BONDING REQUIREMENTS
Upon initial review. it appears the following bonding requircments will apply to this pr~ject:
Performance Guarantees
. Entrance - Acel/Deccllanes
. Monuments & Markers
S!(h::\\'::!L/.~\sp!~~:l~ P.:l!h
Please provide individual, detailed certified Engineer's Estimates for lOO'X. of the cost of labor aud
materials for the constmct ion/installation of the above items. Individual Performance Guarantees, in
the amount of the Engineer's Estimates, will be required to be posted. These may be in the form of
Performance Bonds, Irrevocable Lellers of Credit or Certified Checks. If Certified Checks are utilized
as Performance Guarantees, the check should be made payable to "The City of Carmel or (not am/)
the ])e~'e/oper/()wller". This will make it casier whcn the perfonnance is released and the check is
returned to the bank. Three-year Maintenance Guarantees will be required upon release of the
Performance Guarantees.
Street Cut/Right of Way Permit and Bonding requirements
Any work in the dedicated right of way of Randall Drive, if not included in the work covered by
Performance Guarantees, will require a Street CutJRight of Way Permit and a License and Pennit
Bond. The bond amount will be determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way
(water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc.) @ $2,000.00 per instance.
. .
u
u
Mr. Adam DeHart
May 3, 200 I
Page 3
PROJECT COMMENTS
10. Provide a copy of the plat applicable to this project.
II. Show alllotlblock lines, eilsements, etc. on the construction plans.
12. We assume there are no site plans/proposed development on the south one-half at this time?
13. Please include acel/deccllanes at the Randall Road entrance to this development.
14. All open pavement cuts require Board of Public Works and Safety approval. If there arc alternatives to
open cutting dedicated streets, you will be expected to pursue those alternatives.
15. New asphalt will be required for the entire crossing of the road at the entrance and the cut if the cut is
pursued and approved.
16. ]nstal1 sidewalks/paths (size and material as detennined by DOCS or Parks and Recreation) in the east
right of way of Randall Road.
17. Please provide drainage cales.
18. It is our understanding that commercial/retail sanitary laterals must tenninate into a sanitary structure.
Please conlirm wilh Cannel Utilities.
19. Show the proposed contours of the relocated swale behind building 2 and between buildings I and 2.
20. Change Northwest corner of parking lot to an inlet rather than the concrete spillway.
21. Erosion control at pip outlets (other than silt fence)? We want to see more than is indicated on the
plans.
22. Show elevation of pipe outIetting to (Block A) on the South side of property (currently shown with
pipe slope xx'Yo).
23. Show the TC and ]NV elevation on the storm stmcture on the North side of thc development, East of
Randall Road. Where is the continuation of this outlet pipe? Where does road drainage go to the
North? To the pond in Williamson Run?
The above comments are based upon the Engineering Dcpartmcnt's initial revicw. Please provide our
office with a follow-up letter and revised plans, indicating all revisions. Second and subsequcnt rcviews
will focus only on revised items. It is critical that our office be made aware of allmodilications made on
the plans being re-submilled for review, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall
outside of our initial review.
]f you have questions, please contact Kate Weese or me at 571-2441.
SirrelY~1J.
/ I . .I /I'tl ~/\.. ,; :,
J"-.Y (/v ~'I ......../<>"\j A../ J
Dick Hill. Assistant Director
Department of Engineering
Enclosures
cc: M. Kate Weese. City Engineer (\V/o enclosures)
Laurence Lillig, Department of Community Services (w/o enclosures)
John Duffy, Carmel Utilities (w/o enclosures)
S:\I'ROJR EVO 1 \%I'ROI'.-\R K
85/82/2881 89:19
HAMILTON 00 USD~ -
U
PAGE 85
~-!.L)~)
317-77.6-1181
.W
. .~MtLt~~ '~.~UNTY
. .:. .;,..... .,.,. 1.&.\ .....
317-713-2181
Fax: 317-176.-1iOl
. _,'1
..
Corv;,fJlY.\T10~ Dl:~d RlC f
1~08 South 9th Street · Nobresvilh · IN · 46'06Q-374..S'
r
. " ~' .
:' .. " "
j ,_: 0"
'. ....'. '" . , . 1"": '.
. '>'''.:-.::.::.: ': .:,: '~Y':l 2901
'. ':'\'::;i(;.).:.' u'~:;..~,:'~/ '.\:. ~. ..... .'
:;: . ..... ':"<:"~J~8D;les.Rineha:t;t.:rv . '.
> ~.: '. '.. '.:~ : ':".' :'Stoeppehye~'.&.AssoCia~~ .
'.:'" ......:.....:994(J;AUi~nViJleRd:... ;
". :.-:...... ::.;.;<..'~i~erS,'iN'460~8~20'd5' .
. ~ ',' .' . .... . "",'.' . ,.'1.. . . .
.~. .... ,:'::><: ::,:.' . .~ ''"ticb offi~ 'C8$pus
: ..':..,: :t,,,,~.: ,". '. '. ~,.'l' . /' "".'
'." . . . ';'. ,;::' .
. :;". . '. '. ~ '.'..' .Oeat.JaInes:
..:'.'.~~.~~\,>.'~""."'>' ",:::',,' " ',' .
.' , : . 0:.." > ~:. :';:'> . I ~ve ,..e~e~d ~':project p~81'1S snd:hav& the. following co~ents:
',~;;!i~~~~r:' :.~'~~OdS ~~~3i4, . .' .. . . \
:::':~";::'::'.<i/,"'. .'. ..... .":':.' p~limih:he:p~ant6.one erilsioUeOntrol sequence.' . ,
'.',01tr~',~@;,:f{':~:~~.:.:t~~~~'~00md0n~ "
. .;';.~; > :.::;;::ii:~:~;".;::::::' ':: ':/;.~' Tbi~ :Site l$.'jess':1;ha1i 5 :at!,tes: ,It is hOt ~9.uire4 to subnnum NOI to IDEM ror
'." .... '>':. ';~':~';, :'.::: . . ',;::;.' etoSiOB mdi!re&me1it:cOJitr:til.".. ',' '. . . . .
;::':'>\;:'::;~'"/L>~~':;' ./::~.' .,:. '.. .::'. ';'. '.:' . .' .' .
."." :'.:'.' . .'; .' :>' .' ;:: Sl1o#iliYQu :have -q,~ti()ns reg~dhig these commen'tst please give me a call.
. ,"". \. J ';:_ '.,:.... . . " ';:. '~ ' .
.. '.: "':"':'~~lY~., . '.
.' . ...... '.' ~i:....., ?:/):.: .' .
'. ':. ''0,' , . .'
.';.' ....:. ".jO~:B. South '.
,. .
.'::(~Q ....
'i?;:-f1';/}.' .'
1/4i' 'f//leo
IJOCS pQDI.
. . '. '
......, '::i:.,
.: ",'
. '",'
. " .
, . ~ ..
. ~:J'::': (.~;"
" ." ....'. jo
.' 'i:-': ~<" ~.
. '0',' "I
" ... "
';".;\
.. ... .:...~':; ~<>~.
. "J',. "~}.
. ',,"
. :r~
'., ,'.
.. .:, ~'"
. ',;."
" ~:,
. ' 'I .
. . ,
. '0'
'J
. Cc: .' L. Lillig
$', Cash .'.
s.. Broermatm .
File'
,':
CONSBRVATION ~ DEVELOPMENT ~ SBW'-GOVERNMENT
"AN IIQU,Al. ol'POltTUNlTY IIMn.O'I'lill"
.
'oe5~
,< l-Z:Z:=:~2z-::~
'.'.\.(~'i~ Of ~~~;'':..~..'
.,.,,' ~~~;:\
f/U U ('l~
":.'.' t;; 'e .\:\
tl*~ ~*l!
\~. -$, ~. ,y'
\'"'1'1?, ~1i\>
'?;,Z~.?ON CO,:(11.
".,<::: :::> ::~::~7j 1"
u 0
City of Carmel
;;;.
DEPT. OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
May 1,2001
Adam DeHart
Keeler-Webb Associates
486 Gradle Drive
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: 96th St. Professional Park, Block A: Landscape Plan Review
Dear Adam:
After review of the proposed landscape plans for Block A of the 96th Street Professional
Park, my comments are as follow:
1. Along the west perimeter of the property, there appear to be several conflicts
between required landscape buffering materials, street trees, utility and drainage
easements, and required hardscape features (sidewalk/path). Please detail how
right-of-way features, 20-foot sanitary sewer easement, 25 foot utility and
drainage easement, existing street trees, and the proposed landscaping materials
can all fit into this area.
In this area, the use of constructed planting media, or "structural soils", might be
advantageous. These "soils" are a mixture of graded stone, some soil, and an
organic binder. They can be compacted for use under pavement or walkways and
still provide growing space for plant roots. It has been shown that use of such
growing media also limits curb and sidewalk disturbance by tree roots. Please see
the attached information and contact me if you have any questions.
2. Note 5 states, "ALL EXTERIOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING," but equipment shown on the proposed
site plan (AfC Units and Electrical transformers) is not shown on the landscape
plan. This equipment and associated landscaping must be shown on the landscape
plan.
3. Several inaccuracies exist in the size category of the Planting Schedule (i.e., Acer
sacharum, 2.5" caliper dia., 30" high). All plants should conform to the 1996
edition of "American Standards for Nursery Stock". All shade and ornamental
trees should be at least 1.75 inch caliper, at least 10-12 feet in height, with
appropriately sized root balls and branching structure.
ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417
u
u
'"-::
4. Malus 'White Angle' crabapple is not an acceptable species due to disease.
pressure in this area (apple scab fungus, frreblight, etc.). Please choose an
alternative species from the attached Indiana Urban Forest Council's
recommended list of approved varieties.
5. Landscaping required for the building complex sign must be detailed by position,
number, size, and species on the landscape plan.
6. Planting detaill/Ll needs to include the statement that all stakes and guy wires
will be removed in one (1) year. Trees and shrubs need to be installed so that that
roof flares are at, or slightly above grade level, while the root balls are set on
undisturbed soil in the planting hole. The edges of the planting hole can be dug
slightly deeper. This allows for adequate drainage while eliminating settling of
the plant lower than grade level. This promotes less stress on the plant while it
regenerates roots, and lessens plant mortality. This means more plants will
survive the transplanting process, and they will be healthier. The planting detail
should be changed to reflect this.
Please reply to these comments in writing and by amended plan. You may contact me at
(317) 571-2417 if you have any questions or comments.
Sincerely,
Sc4-b~
Scott Brewer
Urban Forester, City of Carmel
CC: Laurence Lillig, DOCS
DOCS file
May 2000
~,
.
'w
Q
, .'
An IUFC Education Committee ReDor!...
-
Selecting Crabapples
Tre~'ofthe Malus species. Crabapples. You love them or you hate them. To some they are a priceless landscape specimen with
. outstanding flower display. To others they are a maintenance headache with constant base sprouting. Some crabapples can be
plagued with diseases like apple scab and also be defoliated by Japanese beetles. But by choosing your crabapple cultivars wisely,
you can be assured of healthy trees.
A 1997 publication of Purdue Cooperative Extension by Cliff Sadof, Department of Entomology and Paul Pecknold, Department
of Botany and Plant Pathology outlined crabapples resistant to apple scab and Japanese beetles in rndiana and also those species
not recommended. Note that some of the popular street tree species like Snowdrift crabapple are on the latter list.
Keep in mind, also, that crabapples come in all shapes and sizes. They are ideal under power lines and in narrow grow spaces.
When choosing a crabapple species, use the list below to assure plant health and note the eventual width of the tree you plant. If
you keep in mind requirements for sidewalk and street clearances, a proper selection can minimize pruning needs. And don't'
forget to request "tree fonn" when ordering if you want a single stern tree that is already pruned.
Recommended Crabapple Cultivars:
Cultivar
Adirondack
Baccata "Jackii"
Bechtel
Centurion
David
Harvest Go[d
Japanese Flowering
Louisa
Molton Lava
Pink Spires
Prarieflre
Red Baron
Red Jewe[
Sinai Fire
Tea
Van Eseltine
Winter Gold
Zum i Calocarpa
Height
1S'H
30'H
30tH
20'H
12'H
2S'H
Width
IO'W
20'W
1S'W
IS'W
l2'W
20'W
2S'W
IS'W
weeping, true pink flowers, glossy leaves
semi-weeping
pink flowers, purple leaves
pinkish red flowers, purple green leaves
dark red flowers, purple leaves
white flowers, bright red fruit
white flowers, glossy leaves; red fruit
unique spread
upright vase
Comments:
white flowers
white flowers. glossy leaves
rose red flowers, vase upright
white flowers, glossy leaves
gold fruit
1S'H
20'H
18'H
IS'H
15'H
12'W
20'W
S'W
12'W
IS'W
2S'W'
12'W
20'W
24'W
"Red Bud" Crab, wide; white flowers
25'H
20'H
Crabapple Cultivars Not Recommended:
The following should not be used because of insect and d;sease susceptibility
Adams
Baskatong
BI'andywine
Candied Apple
Donald Wyman
Doubloons
Page 4
~
Indian Magic
Indian Summer
Liset
Madonna
Mary Potter
Prarie Maid
Profusion
Robinson
Selkirk
Sentinel
Snowdrift
Sugar Tyme
Velvet Pillar
'tillite Cascade
White Candle'
u
Q
STRUCTURAL SOIL: AN INNOVATIVE MEDIUM UNDER PAVEMENT
THAT IMPROVES STREET TREE VIGOR
Nina Bassuk, Director and Professor Urban Horticulture Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Jason Grabosky,
Urban Horticulture Institute, Corneil University, Ithaca, NY
Peter Trowbridge, F ASLA, Professor Landscape Architecture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY James Urban,
F ASLA, James Urban and Associates, Annapolis, MD
INTRODUCTION
The major impediment to establishing trees in paved urban areas is the lack of an adequate volume of soil for tree
root growth. Soils under pavements are highly compacted to meet load-bearing requirements and engineering
standards. This often stops roots from growing, causing them to be contained within a very small useable volume
of soil without adeguate water, nutrients or oxygen. Subsequently, urban trees with most of their roots under
pavement grow poorly and die prematurely. It is estimated that an urban tree in this type of setting lives for an
average of only 7-10 years, where we could expect 50 or more years with better soil conditions. Those trees that
do survive within such pavement designs often interfere with pavement integrity. Older established trees may
cause pavement failure when roots grow directly below the pavement and expand with age. Displacement of
pavement can create a tripping hazard. As a result, the potential for legal liability compounds expenses associated
with pavement structural repairs. Moreover, pavement repairs which can significantly damage tree roots often
result in tree decline and death.
The problems as outlined above do not necessarily lie with the tree installation but with the material below the
pavement in which the tree is expected to grow. New techniques for meeting the often opposing needs of the tree
and engineering standards are needed. One new tool for urban tree establishment is the redesign of the entire
pavement profile to meet the load-bearing requirement for structurally sound pavement installation while
encouraging deep root growth away from the pavement surface. The new pavement substrate, called 'structural
soil', has been developed and tested so that it can be compacted to meet engineering requirements for paved
surfaces, yet possess qualities that allow roots to grow freely, under and away from the pavement, thereby
reducing sidewalk heaving from tree roots.
CONVENTIONAL TREE PITS ARE DESIGNED FOR FAILURE Looking at a typical street tree pit detail, it is
evident that it disrupts the layered pavement system. In a sidewalk pavement profile, a properly compacted
sub grade of existing material often is largely impermeable to root growth and water infiltration and significantly
reduces drainage if large percentages of sand are not present. Above the subgrade there is usually a structural
granular base material. To maintain a stable pavement surface the base material is well compacted and possesses
high bearing strength. This is why a gravel or sand material containing little silt or clay is usually specified and
compacted to 95% Proctor density (AASHTO T-99). The base layer is granular material with no appreciable
plant available moisture or nutrient holding capacity. Subsequently, the pavement surrounding the tree pit is
designed to repel or move water away, not hold it, since water just below the pavement can cause pavement
failure.
u
Q
Acknowledging that; the above generalizations do not account for ail of the challenges below the pavement for trees,
it is no mystery why trees are often doomed to failure before they are even planted.
The sub grade and granular base course materials are usually compacted to levels associated with root impedance.
Given the poor drainage below the base course, the tree often experiences a larg~ly saturated planting soil. Designed
tree pit drainage can relieve soil saturation, but does nothing to relieve the physical impedance of the material below
the pavement which physically stops root growth.
A NEW SYSTEM TO INTEGRATE TREES and PAVEMENT 'Structural soil' is a designed medium which can
meet or exceed pavement design and installation requirements while remaining root penetrable and supportive of tree
growth. Corneli's Urban Horticulture Institute, has been testing a series of materials over the past five years focused
on characterizing their engineering as well as horticultural properties. The materials tested are gap-graded gravels
which are made up of crushed stone, clay loam, and a hydrogel stabilizing agent. The materials can be compacted to
meet ail relevant pavement design requirements yet allow for sustainable root growth. The new system essentially
forms a rigid, load-bearing stone lattice and partially fills the lattice voids with soil (Figure 1). Structural soil
provides a continuous base course under pavements while providing a material for tree root growth. This shifts
designing away from individual tree pits to an integrated, root penetrable, high strength pavement system.
This system consists of a four to six inch rigid pavement surface, with a pavement opening large enough to
accommodate a forty year or older tree (Figure 2). The opening could also consist of concentric rings of interlocking
pavers designed for removal as the buttress roots meet them. Below that, a conventional base course could be
installed and compacted with the material meeting normal regional pavement specifications for the traffic they are
expected to experience. The base course would act as a root exclusion zone from the pavement surface. Although
field tests show, that tree roots naturally tend to grow away from the pavement surface in structural soil. A geotextile
could segregate the base course of the pavement from the structural soil. The gap-graded, structural soil material has
been shown to allow root penetration when compacted. This material would be compacted to not less than 95%
Proctor density (AASHTO T-99) and possess a California Bearing Ratio greater than 40 [Grabosky and Bassuk
1995,1996]. The structural soil thickness would depend on the designed depth to subgrade or to a preferred depth of
36 inches. This depth of excavation is negotiable, but a 24 inch minimum is encouraged for the rooting zone. The
sub grade should be excavated to parallel the finished grade. Under-drainage conforming to approved engineering
standards for a given region must be provided beneath the structural soil material.
The structural soil material is designed as follows. The three components of the structural soil are mixed in the
following proportions by weight, crushed stone: 100; clay loam: 20; hydrogei: 0.03. Total moisture at mixing
should be 10% (AASHTO T-99 optimum moisture).
Crushed stone (granite or limestone) should be narrowly graded from 3/4 -:1 1/2 inch, highly angular with no imes.
The clay loam should conform to the
u
o
USDA soil classification system (qravel<5%, sand 25-30%, silt 20-40% ,clay 25-40%). Organic matter should
range between 2i and 5%. The hydrogel, a potassium propenoate-propenamide copolymer is added in a small
amount to act as a tackifier, preventing separation of the stone and soil during mixing and installation. Mixing
can be done on a paved surface using front end loaders. Typically the stone is spread in a layer, the dry hydrogel
is spread evenly on top and the screened moist loam is the top layer. The entire pile is turned and mixed until a
uniform blend is produced. The structural soil is then installed and compacted in 6 inch lifts.
In a street tree installation of such a structural soil, the potential rooting zone could extend from building face to
curb, running the entire length of the street. This would ensure an adequate volume of soil to meet the long term
needs of the tree. Where this entire excavation is not feasible, a trench, running continuous and parallel to the
curb, eight feet wide and three feet deep would be minimally adequate for continuous street tree planting.
There will be a need to ensure moisture recharge and free gas exchange throughout the root zone. The challenge
may be met by the installation of a three dimensional geo- composite (a geo-grid wrapped in textile one inch
thick by eight inches wide) which could be laid above the structural soil as spokes radiating from the trunk flair
opening. This is currently in the testing stage. Other pervious surface treatments could also provide additional
moisture recharge, as could traditional irrigation.
When compared to existing practice, additional drainage systems, and the redesigned structural soil layer
represent additional costs to a project. The addition of the proposed structural soil necessitates deeper excavation
of the site which also may be costly. In some regions this excavation is a matter of standard practice. However,
this process might best be suited for new construction and infrastructure replacement or repair, since the cost of
deep excavation is already incurred.
The Urban Horticulture Institute continues to work on refining the specification for producing a structural soil
material to make the system cost effective. It is patent pending and Will be sold with the trademark eCU-Soil' to
insure quality control. Testing over five years has demonstrated that stabilized, gap-graded structural soil
materials can meet this need while allowing rapid root penetration. Several working installations have been
completed in Ithaca, NY, New York City, NY, Cincinnati, OH, Cambridge, MA and elsewhere. To date the
focus has been on the use of these mixes to greatly expand the potential rooting volume under pavement. It
appears that an added advantage of using a structural soil is its ability to allow roots to grow away from the
pavement surface, thus reducing the potential for sidewalk heaving as well as providing for healthier, long-lived
trees.
Grabosky, J. and Bassuk, N. "A New Urban Tree Soil to Safely Increase Rooting Volumes Under Sidewalks".
1995. Journal of Arboriculture 21(4), 197-201.
Grabosky, 1. and Bassuk, N. "Testing of Structural Urban Tree Soil Materials for Use Under Pavement to
Increase Street Tree Rooting Volumes". 1996. Journal of Arboriculture 22(6), 255-263.
iJiil; ~
~H
li~:
~.
. ~0Itl:I!I)
1Jt!M:0W,Jl1.
~~~2l"
_'M~
rO$t'{lIlM~w.
~~J'ft.
I....
"
TREES ~
STRUCTURAL SOIL
By: BiD Wade
The City of Westminster, BC was founded in 1860 and for
eight years served as the capitol of British Columbia. It has
15.38 square km. or 10 square miles and a population of
54,000. The City has about 9,000 public trees of which 2,000
are located in 3 large parks. Of the 7,000 boulevard trees, 650
are planted in sidewalk sites, of which 100 have been planted
in some type of structural soil mix. Although the number is
small, it has provided some valuable experience in using
structural soils. Structural soil provides the necessary com-
paction for the sidewalk, while allowing trees to grow well.
Structural soils consist of 4-5 parts of railway ballast mixed
with peat soil. The soil is 25% silt or clay, 25% organic matter
and 50% fme sand. A plant derived glue called soil stabilizer
is mixed with the soil that makes the soil stick to the surface of
the railway ballast. Roots from the street trees can grow
through the rock voids and pick up necessary nutrients in the
soil particles that are clinging to the rocks.
The city officials approved this concept and in May of 1995,
a downtown street and sidewalk renovation project was begun
and structural soil was used. At that time, 18 Pyrus
cal/eryana 'Chanticleer' were planted at a size of 4.5-5 cm,
dbh Four years later the trees have grown to 15-18 cm (7 in.)
dbh. A view port was installed at the time of the planting. In
the spring of 1999, it was opened and a root O.5-cm in
diameter was observed 2Yz m. from the planting site. The trees
are defmitely not root-bound. In fact they are thriving.
However, it will be many years before this project can be
declared a success.
The cost was about $75 per cubic meter. This included the
cost of the material and the mixing. This cost clearly adds to
the cost of the project and it is too early to determine if these
costs will reduce long-term repair costs to the sidewalks and
curbs. A nearby sidewalk and curb has recently been
renovated at a cost of $80,000, just to repair the damage that
structural soil could prevent.
Since 1995, IS installations of structural soil have been
completed The projects have varied from 3 to 20 trees. There
have been several problems that were resolved and new studies
on the use of structural soil have been carefully evaluated. The
size of the trench has changed based on the site and research
information. The mLjge and irrigation systems have been
improved. View port'Thave also been installed. Methods to
control and redirect root growth have also been developed.
Efforts continue to discuss the merits of structural soil with
city officials. Research by others is also utilized in New
Westminster. A great deal of information and improvement to
our techniques came from the workers on the project site.
While "Trees ARE the City", more healthy trees with adequate
space make for a nicer and more interesting and sustainable
urban forest.
Bill Wade is the Parks Arboristfor the
City of New Westminster, Be
e\1J\ MYCORRHIZAL
ECTO TABS
High Performance Ecto
Tablets contain beneficial
ectomycorrhizal fungi with
timed release fertilizer with
organic matter and
micronutrients.
The Ecto tablets improve
nutrient and water uptake by
providing a larger root mass
and decrease transplanting loss. The fungi helps
prevent against disease and dissolves essential
minerals not normally available.
Each tablet contains five types of ectomycorrh;zal
fungi with a total of 10 million spores. Easy to apply,
the tablets are available in packages and in bulk for
large scale plantings. The Ecto Tab is ideal for bare
root, B&B and seedling plantings.
~JRM Chemical Inc.
15663 NEO Parkway · Cleveland, OR 44128
800-962-4010 · Fax (216) 475-6517 · E-mail: jrm@en.com
Many municipal arborists have PhD's!
They are trained in .Elant !!ealth & !?isease control
MAV/JtJNE 2000 13
KEELER-WEBB ASSOCIATES
Consulting Engineers U
486 Gradle Drive
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
(317) 574-0140
Fax (317) 574-1269
DJ~lflf~ @[? lf~~@[K{A]Dlflf&[1
DATE
JOB NO.
ril 30 2001
0102-019
ATTENTION
TO ..~~TIOF CARMEL DOCS
Mr. Lawrence Lilli
REo
..~....g~~~...?~1.9~~....
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached
o Under separate cover via
96th Street Professional Park
Randall Drive
Cannel, Indi.. ana Ii}~~ ~
I '. ~~
! .
delivery \.. the fOI~ ~~:
.' <:;
\. ...... /"/
o Samples "'(0 SpecificatiOrl"s/
:~,~~- :~IJ~ \-:\)/
..~.!.,.. !P.:4.!.~...4~032
>
o Shop drawings
o Prints
o Plans
o Copy of letter
o Change order
o
COPIES DATE NO. DESCRIPTION
1 4/20/01 9 PS Fonn 3800
1 4/24/01 9 PS Fonn 3811
1 1 Colored Rendering
1 4/24/01 1 Proof of Publication
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
o For approval 0 Approved as submitted
~ For your use 0 Approved as noted
> o As requested 0 Returned for corrections
o For review and comment 0
o FOR BIDS DUE
REMARKS
o Resubmit
copies for approval
o Submit
copies for distribution
o Return
corrected prints
o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
SIGNED:
Adam DeHart, LS
COpy TO
If enclosures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once.
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
//'\\'T~'j"--r-'~-~,..
/,., \ ).J..=--..,_r~tl"/)
/ k/', "-
l "-,, V / '\,
/; ~ '</;\
LiIIig, Laurence M I~~ ~ \0
Friday, April 20, 2001 11 :02 AM \i~~\ '~~ \\\ L~'}
Johnson, Sue E; Morrissey, Phyllis G; Pattyn, Dawn E; Tingley, Connie'9 ~C\ / '/
Hollibaugh, Mike P; Hahn, Kelli A; Dobosiewicz, Jon C V);. /<>
East 96th Street Auto Park, blk A (SU-45-01) ',< ."". . "~/' " I
'r'r-~-"-'\ \ ~.
u
Q
.!:!!!!i, Laurence M
Docket No. SU-45-01 has been assigned to the Special Use application filed by Adam L. DeHart of Keeler-Webb
Associates on behalf of the Trumpington Building Corporation for two general office buildings located at East 96th Street
Auto Park, Block A.
The filing fee for this petition is $630.00.
Sue Ellen, please contact Mr. DeHart at 574-0140 with this information.
---;----1".----..
~\(. i r ';"-',
/1;.):" .: " " ,
/,~>/ .A
l";/ T
f'~/ ~~rc@nRf~r
\;~: APR 20 200
\-:;\ DOCS
\'-' "
~"/'
l>.,
" /'1'''-;'-''
'-, '. .
.,. __L..:____
~ ~\~\
Laurence M. Lillig, Jr.
Planning & Zoning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Phone: 317.571.2417
Fax: 317.571.2426
llillig@ci.carmel.in.us
1
APR 17 '01 05:05PM
P.1/1
u
Adam DeHart
Keeler-Webb Assoc.
Re: 9~ Street Professional Park
I have reviewed the plans for this project. It appears that this project is located within the
limits of the City of Carmel and is not within the watershed of a Regulated Drain.
Therefore, the drainage approval for this project falls under the jurisdiction of the Cannel
City Engineer's Office.
If you have .any questions, please feel free to contact this office at 776-8495.
~
- ~.n T. Cash Y
Plan Reviewer
~~.~.
Cc: Camel DOCS
Carmel Eng.
SCS
Co. Hwy
--
Q
o
City of Carmel
Fire Department Headquarters
2 CIVIC SQUARE
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
317/571-2600
~
[Rf~iC/~pnl7i2'
APR !';'YIJif';/Q)
25 2001
Docs
. - r i_
Adam DeHart, LS.
Keeler-Webb Associates
486 Gradle Dr.
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: 96th Street Professional Park
LETTER OF APPROVAL
The undersigned has reviewed the proposed plans for
96th Street Professional Park
and has approved the plans subject to the following:
1. We are requesting the installation of a Knox Box for fire department emergency access. We
would also request the building be keyed so a grand master key will unlock all suites for
emergency access after hours.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Date: March 26. 2001
By: Gary Hoyt, Fire Marshal
Carmel Fire Department
Fire Prevention Saves Lives and Property
J,
1108 So~ 9th Strut
Noblesville,IN'{606fi.3745
Ph. (3"1'7) 773-1432 /( :~'\J~L=
Fax (317) 776-11 0 I /~'>'/
, /0" 4
Drainage, Er?sion an~ Sediment C?rlfol PI~~
Techmcal-RevIew and Comet I APR 18' 2 01
, ,
DOCS
,.::::JoliN B. SOVTH p.&'.
Plan Review Procedure: Site Visit Date:
Location: &" S/.oE' ~F ~A#/)~J..'- J)/nUE
Legal Description: S e-C. B
Township: 17# ' Range: ~ E.
Plan Review Date: 3 - 3D - zool
, ' Civil ToWnship: C ~r
T1te teclinici:d revieW and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness afthe ,erosion and sediment control
, plan/or. t1ieproject. T1te erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewedfor the adequacy of the
engineer#tg design. AIl practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in ihe comments should he
evaluated as to 'fiteir feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices deSigned by a qualified engineer.
T1te plan has not been reviewedfor local, state or federal permits that may be required to prOceed with this
project. Additional informa!i.on. including design calculations may be requested to~her evaluate the erosion
sediment cq#"ol plan. ' .
The erosion and.sediment contro) plan "has ~een reviewed and it.has been determined that the plan:
n Satisfies the:minimum requirements,an~ intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded
to the Indiana Department of EnvironmentarManagement
submitted:
inimurn req~irements and intent of.3271AC 15-5 (Rule'S); deficiencies are noted in
e comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violation of the rille and must
addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be
. Please address revisions to the reviewer.
Proper.implementation of the erosion and sedimeJr, control plan and inspections'ofthe construction site by tlie
developer or a representative are necessary to minimize oJj-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware
that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the
erosiolJ. and sediment control plan. The plan must be aflexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute
practices as necessary. .
~
PROJECf: . 9/,fIt SI. f~()F: QI<
Page 2 of..3
Yes No
~ 0
m 0
~ 0
~ 0
I)lI 0
lA
IB
lC
ID
IE
Yes No
0 KI 2A
0 ~ 2B
0 P5l 2C
0 ~ 2D
Ii!I 0 2E.
fill 0 2F
m 0 2G
0 IE 2H
IKI 0 21
Yes No
0 W 3A
0 fill 3B
Yes No
1Kl. 0 4A
iii 0 4B
0 H 4C
fif 0 4D
~ 0 4E
lB 0 4F.
1ii 0 4G
0 ~ 4H
~ 0 41
0 H/40 4J
IJJ 0 4K
u
ARE THE FOlLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS 1
(AU Plans Must Include ApproprUzte Legends, Scales'. mul North bow)
(Items that are NOt Applicable tQ this Project are designated by HA)
PROJECf INFO~TION
Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other aretU o/the cmmty)
Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
Location of Planned and/or Existing Ro~ds, Utilities, Structu~ ffighways, etc.
Lot and/or Building Locations
Landuse of Adjacent Areas .
(Show tlle Entire Upstream Watenhed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet a/the Property lines)
TOPOGRAPIDC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
Existing Vegetation (Identify andDelineate )
Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Ftoodways (Noie if None) S .#~u.) C 1~(Jt, -h'"ck.5 /
Soils Information (/fhydric soils are present. it is the responsibility o/the owner/developer to
investigare the existence 0/ wetlands ~ to obtain pennit3 from the appropriate government agenciesJ
Existing and Planned Contoun at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns
Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater.Discbarge WaD Leave the Site
Identify All Receiving Waten (((Discharge is to Q Separate Municipal Storm Sewer. Identify the
Name o/theMrmicipal Operator and the Ultimate Rsceiving Water)
Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None)
Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts. Storm Sewers. Channels. and S'WtZles)
LAND DISTURBING ACfIVITIES
Location and Approximate Dimensions of AU Disturbed Areas [i.e.. Construction limits]
. .
(Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated)
Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locati0n8 or Note if None)
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (&lative to Earth" Disturbing Activities)
Monitoring and Mainte.ilance Guidelines for Each Measure
Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location. COnstruction Detail. Dimensions. and Specijicodons)
Temporary S<<ding (Specifications: Including Seed MIX, Fertilizer, Lime. and Mulch Rates)
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location. Construction Detail. Dimensions. and Specifications)
Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location. Construction Detail. Dim~ons. and Specifications)
Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location. Construction Detail. Dimensions. and Specificodons)
Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location. Constnlction Detail. Dimensions. and Specificotions)
Stable Construction Entrance (Location. Construction Detail. Dimensions. and Specifications)aErosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications)
Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including seed Mix, Fertilizer. lime, and.Mulch Rates)
Revised 4/97
f',
--I
r'
Q
u
"
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
C011MENTS
Project: ,t fir SrEeEr fEOF~SSI/)#fJl.. ?~
Page 3 of 3
Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the
design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in
Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar
Guidance Documents. . .
/. S"'r~1 C-Y- Retl/SE f)E'rA/J. z/c,. /de $"(Jk'FAcc61# rHE
~tVClu:-re S#O()/"[) 6E '-EVE/., t(.,nr// ,.//~ .S'tl.JA~ /NV&..eT,
2. rJ~ s,. e"ft.,"ce... /;~d:s
Hf)(.t) IV,'II Ybll solve?
3.
s/cks,
;...~ (
, oJ ,.e t.e>~JU ~"e. ~,.,'
cc: .1..///1'9
s.. C,A.S;,(
;;-A::
r:
J
u
HAMILTON CO BWY. ~~~ Carmel DOCD
: 0
III 0011001
04/05/01 13:56 FAX
HAMILTON COUNTY
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT
RE: 96111 Street Professlo I Park
Prellmlnaf}' Plans
N of 96'" Street I W of Gray Road
Clay Township
Dear Mr. DeHart:
filFlECOPY
April 5, 2001
Mr. Adam DeHart, L.S.
Keeler - Webb Associates
486 Gradle Drive
Cannel, Indiana 46032
~~
4011 ~/fb?~D
itA lO1l1 ;--.- i
"'Uc, lql:. /
'\ /'<1/
',/ '>~ -./\ '>/
"<,' /j--,-:;-\C\' >,/
'--.L-.~-3~~/
-\
,
This letter serves to acknowledge receipt of a transmittal containing the plans for the 96111 Street
Professional Park. After reviewIng the plans, the Highway Department has the following comments:
1. It appears that this project lies entirely within the limits onhe City of Carmel. Therefore, all
further comments should be directed toward the City. If you have any Information contrary to this
statement, please contact me Immediately.
If you have any comments or questions regarding thIs letter or project, please feel free to contact me at
any time. Thank you for your attention and cooperation. .
Sincerely,
/,E- (g~
Steven J. Broermann
Staff Engineer
ce:
Laurence Lillig. Jr.
G:\USERS\SB\ZOO1 T8c\04-05-01.af.wpd
1700 Soutb 10'" Stroot
Noble$VUle, In. 46060
~WW.co.h8mnton.ln.us
Office (317) 713-mo
Fax (317) 776-9814
VI
o
u
April 2, 2001
Carmel
Mr. Phillip A. Witt
Keeler-Webb Associates
486 Gradle Drive
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: 96th Street Professional Park
Randall Drive
Carmel, Indiana
Job No.: 0102-034
Dear Mr. Witt:
it:
~~~~~~~\QJ
. fR 4 2QQ1
t}Ocs
I have received and reviewed the Construction Documents for the above-
mentioned project.
At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law
enforcement efforts.
If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully,
~D.-?rt,
Michael D. Fogarty
Chief of Police
MDF:vb
cc: Dept. of Community Services
rcement Agency
Fax (317) 571-2512
(317) 571-2500
A Nationally Accredit
,1
'(j
rol\..:Go UNTY
Soil & Water
/\
1108 V' 9th Strut ~-UI:~ T~t,~"
Noblesville, IN.{6060-3745 n)>~ "'(~~":"'\
Ph. (3r7) 773-1432 /~~)' ,(
Fax (317) 776-1101 1':)" ~ .t~~
'-'!I I/PI ~Q
iment Conti-~l Plan '2 ~
mment\\ ,,'1/1/
\:)~\,
, ,
, '
I
I
Project Name:
Submitted By:
II( 57. E: ss
IKUHPt NG TON' 8 lJILDI.N6 L6R/'.
7/3D LANTE;l?N ~D.
::z:/./ /J I A /VA PO/..../ s -r ^'
,
~~2$"~
/< cELeR-14EBB A.5$X.
~8~ G~ADL.E .DR/lie
CARIfE~ -'- N Y"032,
ReviewedBy:.:TOH)./ 8. SOOTH 1'.&.
Plan Review Procedure: Site Visit Date:
Location: &",- S/PE~r ~ANL)~J..'- J)/rlYE
Legal Description: S EC. 8
Township: 17# ' Range: 'IE,
Plan Review Date: 3-30-zool
Civil ToWnship: C ~r
The tecJi:nici:d revieW and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness o/the erosion and sediment control
, plan/or. t1ieproject. The erosion and sediment Control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the
engineeringdesigri. A1I prapices includedintheplan, as well as those reconjmended iniheeomments should be
evaluated as toiiicir feasibility by ~ rplalffied individual wjth structural practices ckSigned by a quOIified engineer.
-nze plan Iuis not b~ reviewed for locatstateor federal Permits tlUrt lnCfYbe requiTed to pr-Oceed with thiS' -
project. AdiIitioruiI lir/ormation. indudingdesign calculCdions may be 'reqUested to further evaluate the erosion
sediment cQn!Tol plan.. .
The erosion and sediment contro.l plan 'has been reviewed and it-has been determined that the plan:
o Satisfies the,minimum requirements. and intent of327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded
to the Indiana Department of Environmental'Management
o Refer to the COIIunents section for additional information.
~ Does not sa~tY the minimum requirements and intent of327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in
the checkliSt and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violation of the rule and must
be adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be
submitted:
. Please address revisions to the reviewer.
Proper implemel!tation of the ero#on and sedimeJ': control plan and inspiXtions' of the construction site by the
developer or a represenia.tivt; are neq~sary to minimize olf-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware
thfiunfor~ept cons~cti?n ac!iyitit!;fi~ti~the(cotu!itio~ may effecttheferforma'}ce of a practfc'e or the ~.
ero.siqn and sediment control plan.' The plan must be ajlexible docUment, with provisions to'modify or substitute
,.... ".' , .- , '.-. '.
practices as necessary. , -" -' '. , '
.
.
PROJECf: 9t./It S";" ?~()r: VI<
Page 2 of..3
..
Yes
fj(1
~
~
Ij
l)il
No
o
o
o
o
o
Yes No
0 ~ 2A
0 g] 2B
0 181 2C
0 m 2D
~ 0 2E.
M 0 2F
IN 0 2G
0 m 2H
IKI 0 21
Yes No
0 IN 3A
0 M 3B
Yes No
~ 0 4A
R 0 4B
0 H 4C
oa 0 4D
to 0 4E
OJ 0 4F
fii 0 4G
0 ~. 4H
Ja 0 41
0 N/A 0 4J
rp 0 4K
()
/'\\I\ --J r-C~>>-.
~ THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE P~S; ~.~ ." ,
(All P/4ns Must Include Appropriate Legends, Sctzli:s, and Nordt Arrowl-' f
(Items that are Not Applicable to this Project are d~gnated by HA) I. :~i APH 2 W
i.1 I 2001
ADa,..
\ /\ IJ'S
.' ,\
\
',;'\'-;-.
lA
IB
lC
ID
IE
PROJECf INFORMATION
Project Location Map (Show project in relation to otheramu a/the county)
Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project
Location of Planned and/or Existing Ro~ds, Utilities, Structu~ Highways, ete.
Lot and/or Building Locations
Landuse of Adjacent Areas
(Show the Entire Upstream Watenhed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet a/the Property Lines)
TOPOGRAPmC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES
Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate)
Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site
100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None) S' ,#()W C /~t.J(/ ~Ck5 /
Soils Information (/fhydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer to
investigate the existence of wetlands and to obtain permiu from the appropriate govemment agenciesJ
Existing and Planned Contoan at an IntenraI Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Pattems
Locations of Specific Points Where Stormwater"Disc:harge Will Leave the Site
Identify An Receiving Waten( I[Discharge is to Q SeparateMunicipal Storm Sewer, Identify the
Name oftheMunicipal Operatorand the Ultimate Receiving Water)
Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None)
Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Stonn Sewers, Channels, and Swales)
LAND DISTURBING ACI'lVITIES
Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i.e., Construction Limiu]
(Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Shou/d be Clearly Designated)
Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (ShO'W Locations or Note if None)
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES
Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (&/ative to Earth Disturbing Activities)
Monitoring and Maintenance Guiddines for Each Measure
Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Lo<Xltion, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Temporary ~ding (Specifications; Including Seed MIX, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Permanent Erosion and SediDlellt Control Measures
(Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Lo<Xltion, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications)
Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lob (Specifications)
Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer. Lime, and Mulch Rates)
Revised 4/97
.
.
u
o
/ ".
. ~~ ~
./1Jp ~~~
4 < ~:@
bocS ~~
..
EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN
TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMENTS
Project: 't /, fir SrLCc.r f~OFt:SS//)/VLJ'- ?~
Page 3 of 3
Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must mie-r th-i--
design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in
Developing Areas "from the Indiana Department olNatural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar
Guidance Documents. -
. ---:
1-"
>-
-\
"
I. sit'/" I c'/- Rev/SE /)e'rAIt. z/c". 7de- f{J~F/l.ce t)r r#c
col'lcllere s#{>()I..D.BE LeVEL. I(.J/n'/ r#e ..s'l.UALe /.NvEJ2,.
2, rJ~ s: e"ft.,l'1ce... b~ds
HfJW WI'!! YbI.I Sl>/Vc.?
3.
/'5 /,C U:)~M't'''tt!/ t:'~
.$~U~ s/~.
cc: L.~/lj9
S.-CAS:;
;:;k
u
u
KEELER -WEBB ASSOCIATES
Consulting Engineers' Planners . Surveyors
\ \ <lJ( (I
Cil", \ ..l_L"'-'::.l I r <p
" ",Y'" -<...../.. ':/
S". >/ AI... "~~;c.,
~: '): ~ \;:-.
~;; _f1J ~\ 't
~ ~\~~ 1~
~v~ fjOc:f' F'/
<t~ ~"VI
~/ ~.
V,,,.. ,/". \
".:!f.J}'I'/J-r--,.-. ,..-r \ 'v
~~~..:if3 \ \ ,
TELEPHONE (.317) 574-0140 . FAX (.317) 574-1269
486 GRAOLE DR'V';~
CARMEL. INDIANA 46032
March 22, 2001
Mr. Laurence Lillig
Carmel Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Re.: 96th STREET PROFESSIONAL PARK
Block A, East 96th Street Auto Park
Randall Drive, Carmel, Indiana
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Keeler-Webb Associates is acting as agent and engineer for Trumpington Building Corporation,
who is the owner/developer of the above property. The project site lies within Block A in East
96th Street Auto Park and is currently vacant. The developer's plan is to lease the tenant spaces
within the facilities to medical and professional businesses.
We propose to construct two single story structures containing 12,146 sq. ft., which will face
Randall Drive on the northern 2.722 Acres of Block A. We expect the tenants to have daily
deliveries from overnight carriers and the parking facilities have been designed to accommodate
the greater capacity required for medical office. The building materials will consist of brick, EIFS
(color, tan), and a shingled roof with several gables and overhangs
All utilities are either available on site or in the adjacent right-of-way. We propose to install a
curb cut at the location on the construction documents for use by the owners and employees who
will operate out of these buildings on a daily basis. Stormwater will be collected on-site via
storm sewers and conveyed to the existing swales which outlet into the Carmel Creek. The
proposed drainage and grading plan will not impact the f100dway of Carmel Creek. No
construction activity is planned east of the landscaping berm.
This submittal is for the City of Carmel TAC. Meeting to be held on April 18, 2001 followed by
the Board of Zoning Appreals meeting on May 28, 2001? The project is subject to the recorded
covenants and restrictions approved by SU-53-00 on June 26, 2001. Floor plans, elevations,
and a digital colored rendering are currently being revised and will be forwarded shortly to your
attention. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at any
time.
Respectfully,
KEELER-WEBB ASSOCIATES
4f-J)k
Adam DeHart, LS
Project Manager
Enclosed:
2 sets of revised construction documents, 2 sets of applications for Special Use Approval
0102-019b.doc
Indianapolis, IN. Chicago,IL . St. Louis, MO. Cincinnati, OH. Henderson, KY. Jacksonville. FL
U
KEELER -WEBB ASSOCIATES
u
Consulting Engineers. Planners' Surveyors
TELEPHONE (317) 574-0140 . f"AX (317) 574-1269
486 GRAOLE ORIVf"
CARMEL. INDIANA 46032
. "
'-<</'\
i fJlti ~ \(:\
( /(A!ll~6~ftt@ 'f\
J 2()(}/ }~~}
',- c~, DOCS 1--;
\\':, /~~f/
...,,/ (:Ye' .~y
'0<4it;sJj?
March 16,2001
Mr. Laurence Lillig
Carmel Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
Re.: 96th STREET PROFESSIONAL PARK
Block A, East 96th Street Auto Park
Randall Drive, Carmel, Indiana
PROJECT NARRATIVE
Keeler-Webb Associates is acting as agent and engineer for Trumpington Building Corporation,
who is the owner/developer of the above property. The project site lies within Block A in East
96th Street Auto Park and is currently vacant. The developer's plan is to lease the tenant spaces
within the facilities to medical and professional businesses.
We propose to construct two single story structures containing 12,146 sq. ft., which will face
Randall Drive on the northern 2.722 Acres of Block A. We expect the tenants to have daily
deliveries from overnight carriers and the parking facilities have been designed to accommodate
the greater capacity required for medical office. The building materials will consist of brick, EIFS
(color, tan), and a shingled roof with several gables and overhangs
All utilities are either available on site or in the adjacent right-of-way. We propose to install a
curb cut at the location on the construction documents for use by the owners and employees who
will operate out of these buildings on a daily basis. Stormwater will be collected on-site via
storm sewers and conveyed to the existing swales which outlet into the Carmel Creek. The
proposed drainage and grading plan will not impact the floodway of Carmel Creek_ No
construction activity is planned east of the landscaping berm.
This submittal is for the City of Carmel TAC. Meeting to be held on April 18, 2001 followed by
the Plan Commission meeting on May 15, 2001. The project is subject to the recorded
covenants and restrictions approved by SU-53-00 on June 26, 2001. Floor plans, elevations,
and a digital colored rendering are currently being revised and will be forwarded shortly to your
attention. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact us at any
time.
Respectfully,
KEELER-WEBB ASSOCIATES
Ald-oIdlt
Project Manager
Enclosed:
2 sets of preliminary construction documents, 2 sets of applications for ADLS & DP
0102-019.doc
Indianapolis, IN. Chicago, IL . St. Louis, MO . Cincinnati, OH - Henderson, KY. Jacksonville. FL