Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCC-09-18-06-02 Gramercy EDA Sponsors: Councilors Carter and Sharp RESOLUTION CC-09-18-06-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA APPROVING CERTAIN MATTERS IN CONNECTION WITH THE GRAMERCY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA WHEREAS, the City of Carmel Redevelopment Commission (the "Redevelopment Commission"), as the governing body for the City of Carmel Redevelopment Department (the "Department"), pursuant to Indiana Code 36-7-14, as amended (the "Act), adopted a Declaratory Resolution on July 18, 2006 (the "Declaratory Resolution"), designating an area known as the Gramercy Economic Development Area (the "Economic Development Area") as an economic development area pursuant to Section 41 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Declaratory Resolution approved an economic development plan for the Economic Development Area designated as the Gramercy Economic Development Plan (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Carmel Plan Commission, on August 15, 2006, approved and adopted a resolution (the "Plan Commission Order") determining that the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan conform to the plan of development for the City of Carmel and approving the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 16(a) & (b) of the Act, the Common Council of the City (the "Council") determines that the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan for the Economic Development Area, in all respects, conform to the plan of development for the City, and approves in all respects, the Declaratory Resolution, the Plan for the Economic Development Area and the Plan Commission Order. 2. The Council hereby approves the determination that the Economic Development Area is an economic development area pursuant to Section 41 of the Act. 3. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by the Council and approval by the Mayor as required by law. PASSED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, this I <2f'1r..-day of ~ ' 2006, by a vote of S ayes and ~ nays. Richard 1. Sharp, Pres ent Pro Tempore ~ RaId E. Carter JL~C). 1YiA.1tr-' Brian D. Mayo N () '\ P ((.. ES E Jlrj Fredrick J. Glaser o .prOS ED Mark Rattermann ATTEST: asurer g es Brainard, Mayor ATTEST: Diana 1. Cordray, IAMC, I rk-Treasurer of the City of Carmel, Indiana Prepared by: Bruce D. Donaldson Barnes & Thornburg LLP I I South Meridian Street Indianapolis, IN 46204 INDSOI BDD 879401vl 2 RESOLUTION NO. 09 ~ I ~.. 0 (p RESOLUTION OF THE CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A RESOLUTION AND AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF CARMEL REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONFORM TO THE PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL AND APPROVING THE RESOLUTION AND PLAN WHEREAS, the Cannel Plan Commission (the "Plan Commission") is the body charged with the duty of developing a general plan of development for the City of Cannel, Indiana (the "City"); and WHEREAS, the City of Carmel Redevelopment Commission (the "Redevelopment Commission"), as the governing body for the City of Carmel Redevelopment Department (the "Department"), pursuant to Indiana Code 36-7-14, as amended (the "Act), adopted a Declaratory Resolution on July 18, 2006 (the "Declaratory Resolution''), designating an area known as the Gramercy Economic Development Area (the "Economic Development Area") as an economic development area pursuant to Section 41 of the Act; and WHEREAS, the Declaratory Resolution approved an economic development plan for the Economic Development Area designated as the "Gramercy Economic Development Plan" (the "Plan"); and WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Commission has submitted the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan to the Plan Commission for approval pursuant to the provisions of Section 16 of the Act, which Declaratory Resolution and Plan are attached hereto and made a part hereof; and WHEREAS, in determining the location and extent of the Economic Development Area, the Plan Commission has determined that no residents of the City of Cannel will be displaced by the proposed development thereof; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has reviewed the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan and determined that they conform to the plan of development for the City, and now desires to approve the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION, THAT: 1. The Plan Commission hereby finds aod determines that the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan for the Economic Development Area conform to the plan of development for the City. 2. The Declaratory Resolution and the Plan for the Economic Development Area are hereby approved. 3. This Resolution hereby constitutes the written order of the Plan Commission approving the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan for the Economic Development Area pursuant to Section 16 of the Act. 4. The Secretary is hereby directed to file a copy of the Declaratory Resolution and the Plan for the Economic Development Area with the minutes ofthis meeting. SO RESOLVED BY THE CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION this 15th day of August, 2006. CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION A TIEST: Secretary [NOSOI BOD 864154v3 -2- RESOLUTION NO. 14-2006 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CARMEL REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION DECLARING AN AREA IN THE CITY OF CARMEL AS AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AREA AND APPROVING AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR SAID AREA WHEREAS, the City of Carmel Redevelopment Commission (the "Commission"), governing body of the City of Cannel Department of Redevelopment (the "Department"), pursuant to Indiana Code 36-7-14, as amended (the "Act"), has thoroughly studied that area of the City of Cannel, Indiana (the "City"), as described on Exhibit A attached hereto and designated as the "Gramercy Economic Development Area" (the "Economic Development Area"); and WHEREAS, the existing public infrastructure is inadequate to service anticipated demand in or near the Economic Development Area; and WHEREAS, there has been presented to this meeting for consideration and approval of the Commission an economic development plan (the "Plan") for the Economic Development Area and entitled "Gramercy Economic Development Plan"; and WHEREAS, the Commission has caused to be prepared maps and plats showing the boundaries of the Economic Development Area, the location of various parcels of property, streets, alleys, and other features affecting the replatting, replanning, rezoning, or redevelopment of the Economic Development Area, and the parts of the Economic Development Area that are to be devoted to public ways, sewerage and other public purposes under the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Commission has caused to be prepared estimates of tlle costs of the development projects as set forth in the Plan; and WHEREAS, the Plan and supporting data was reviewed and considered at this meeting; and WHEREAS, Section 39 of the Act has been created and amended to pennit the creation of "allocation areas" to provide for the allocation and distribution of property taxes for the purposes and in the manner provided in said section; and WHEREAS, Sections 41 and 43 of the Act have been created to penn it the creation of "economic development areas" and to provide that all of the rights, powers, privileges and immunities that may be exercised by tins Commission in a redevelopment area or urban renewal area may be exercised in an economic development area, subject to the conditions set fOrtll in tile Act; and WHEREAS, the Commission deems it advisable to apply the provisions of said Sections 39,41, and 43 of the Act to tbe Plan and financing of the Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City of Carmel Redevelopment Commission, governing body of the City of Carmel Department of Redevelopment, as follows: I. The Plan for the Economic Development Area promotes significant oPPOItunities for the gainful employment of its citizens, attracts major new business enterprises to the City, may result in the retention or expansion of significant business enterprises existing in the boundaries of the City, and meets other purposes of Sections 2.5,41 and 43 of the Act, including without limitation benefiting public health, safety and welfare, increasing the economic well being of the City and the State of Indiana (the "State"), and serving to protect and increase property values in the City and the State. 2. The Plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved by regulatory processes or by the ordinary operation of private enterprise without resort to the powers allowed under Sections 2.5, 41 and 43 of tile Act because of lack of local 2 public improvements, including without limitation the cost of the projects contemplated by the Plan. 3. The public health and welfare will be benefited by accomplishment oflhe Plan for the Economic Development Area. 4. The accomplishment of the Plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by the attraction or retention of permanent jobs, an increase in the property tax base, improved diversity of the economic base and other similar public benefits. 5. The Plan for the Economic Development Area conforms to other development and redevelopment plans for the City. 6. In support of the findings and determinations set forth in Sections I through 5 above, the Commission hereby adopts the specific findings set forth in the Plan. 7. While the Plan contemplates the possibility of property acquisition as a part of the economic development strategy, the Department does not at this time propose to acquire any specific parcel of land or interests in land within the boundaries of the Economic Development Area. At the time the Department proposes to acquire specific parcels of land, the required procedures for amending the Plan under tile Act will be followed, including notice by publication and to affected property owners and a public hearing. 8. The Commission finds that no residents of the Economic Development Area will be displaced by any project resulting from the Plan, and therefore finds that it 3 does not need to give consideration to transitional and pennanent provisions for adequate housing for the residents. 9. The Plan is hereby in all respects approved, and the secretary of the Commission is hereby directed to file a certified copy of the Plan with the minutes of this meeting. The Economic Development Area is hereby designated as an "economic development area" under Section 41 of the Act. 10. The portion of the Economic Development Area described in Exhibit B hereto is hereby designated as the "Gramercy Allocation Area" pursuant to Section 39 of the Act for purposes of the allocation and distribution of property taxes for the purposes and in the manner provided by said Section. Any real property taxes subsequently levied by or for the benefit of any public body entitled to a distribution of property taxes on taxable property in said allocation area shall be allocated and distributed as follows: Except as otherwise provided in said Section 39, the proceeds of taxes attributable to the lesser of the assessed value of the property for the assessment date with respect to which the allocation and distribution is made, or the base assessed value, shall be allocated to and when collected paid into the funds of the respective taxing units. Except as otherwise provided in said Section 39, property tax proceeds in excess of those described in the previous sentence shall be allocated to the redevelopment district and when collected paid into the "Gramercy Allocation Area Allocation Fund" for said allocation area that may be used by the redevelopment district to do one or more of the things specified in Section 39(b)(2) of the Act, as the same may be amended from time to time. Said allocation fund may not be used for operating ex.penses of the Commission. Except as otherwise provided in the Act, before July 15 of each year, the Commission shall take the actions set forth in Section 39(b)(3) of the Act. ] I. The foregoing allocation provision set forth in Section 10 shall expire on the date that is thirty (30) years after the effective date of this resolution. 12. The officers of the Commission are hereby directed to make any and all required filings with the Indiana Department of Local Government Finance and the Hamilton County Auditor in connection with the creation of the allocation area. 4 13. The provisions of this Resolution shall be subject in all respects to the Act and any amendments thereto. 14. This Resolution, together with any supporting data and together with the Plan, shall be submitted to the Carmel Plan Commission (the "Plan Commission") and the Common Council of the City of Carmel (the "Common Council") as provided in the Act, and if approved by the Plan Commission and the Common Council shall be submitted to a public hearing and remonstrance as provided by the Act, after public notice as required by the Act. Adopted the 18th day of July, 2006. CITY OF CARMEL REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSI.~ ' ~ ;& 1____ esident /V 6t- Pre 'Se 11 + V;"~l4 Secretary . iLtrrU1{1;? 5 EXHIBIT A Description of the Gramercv Economic Development Area The Gramercy Economic Development Area is described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the west right of way line of US431 (a.k.a. Keystone Avenue), with the south right of way line of 1261h Street in Carmel, IN; Then proceeding southward along the west right of way line of US431 (a.k.a. Keystone Avenue), which also forms the eastern boundary of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-003.000, to the southeast corner of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-003.000, The turning westward along the southern boundary of parcels numbered 16-10-31-00-00- 003.000, 16-10-31-00-00-002.000, and 16-10-31-00-00-002.001, to the southwest corner of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-002.001, Then turning northward along the western boundary of parcels numbered 16-10-31-00-00- 002.001, 16-10-31-00-00-002.000 and 16-10-31-00-00-001.000 to the point of intersection with the southern right of way line of 1261h Street, Then turning eastward along the southern right of way line of 1261h Street to the point of beginning. The above description containing four parcels, according to the online records of the Hamilton County Auditor, including parcels numbered: 16-10-31-00-00-001.000 16-1 0-31-00-00-002.000 16-10-31-00-00-002.001 16-10-31-00-00-003.000 6 EXHIBIT B Description of the Gramercv Allocation Area The Gramercy Allocation Area is described as follows: SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract III That portion of the Northwest and that portion of the Northeast Quarter, all located in Section 31 _ Township 18 North - Range 4 East of the second principal meridian, Hamilton County, Indiana more particularly described as follows: Considering the North line of said Northeast Quarter as bearing East 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. COMMENCING at the North Quarter Comer of said Section 31 monumented by a Railroad spike; thence on and along the North line of said Northeast Quarter, East 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 1011.1 7 feet to a PK nail on the West Right-of-Way of State Road 431; thence the next four (4) Courses and Distances being on and along said West Right-of-Way, South 00 degrees 03 minutes 55 seconds West 16.14 feet; thence, South 67 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds East 54.27 feet to a 5/8 inch Rebar with cap (herein called monument); thence, South 89 degrees 56 minutes 05 seconds East 200.00 feet to a monument; thence, South 38 degrees 59 minutes 10 seconds East 16.08 feet to a monument; thence parallel with said North line, West 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 500.10 feet to a monument, same being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence, South 82 degrees 33 minutes 45 seconds West 141.88 feet to a monument; thence, South 50 degrees 22 minutes 10 seconds West 99.03 feet to a monument; thence, South 26 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds West 192.22 feet to a monument; thence, North 68 degrees 58 minutes 33 seconds West 535.83 feet to a monument; thence, South 21 degrees 01 minutes 27 seconds West 147.35 feet to a monument; thence, South 65 degrees 59 minutes 12 seconds East 116.92 feet to a monument; thence, South 15 degrees 26 minutes 32 seconds West 25.56 feet to a monument; thence, South 66 degrees 01 minutes 08 seconds East 134.36 feet to a monument; thence, South 29 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West 97.24 feet to a monument; thence, South 12 degrees 47 minutes 39 seconds East 304.75 feet to a monument; thence, South 61 degrees 40 minutes 25 seconds East 93.38 feet to a monument; thence, South 10 degrees \3 minutes 43 seconds East 328.14 feet to a monument; thence, South 15 degrees 49 minutes 07 seconds East 587.69 feet to a monument; thence, North 80 degrees 07 minutes 12 seconds East 230.48 feet to a monument; thence, South 00 degrees 06 minutes 59 seconds East 177.07 feet to a monument; thence, South 16 degrees 59 minutes 29 seconds West 394.75 feet to a monument; thence, South 23 degrees 10 minutes 56 seconds West 337.50 feet to a monument; thence, South 00 degrees 23 minutes 50 seconds East 97.88 feet to a monument; thence, South 81 degrees 51 minutes 49 seconds West 35.52 feet to a monument; thence, North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 162.93 feet to a monument; thence, North 15 degrees 27 minutes 26 seconds East 43.25 feet to a monument; thence, North 11 degrees 34 minutes 48 seconds East 333.70 feet to a monument; thence, North 20 degrees 45 minutes 23 seconds East 261.64 feet to a monument; thence, North 15 degrees 46 7 SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract III (-continued- ) minutes 38 seconds West 85.04 feet to a monument; thence, South 67 degrees 39 minutes 46 seconds West 133.03 feet to a monument; thence, South 77 degrees 15 minutes 25 seconds West 122.33 feet to a monument; thence, North 18 degrees 35 minutes 28 seconds West 67.15 feet to a monument; thence, North 59 degrees 48 minutes 53 seconds West 266.64 feet to a monument; thence, North 00 degrees 00 minutes 05 seconds East 325.21 feet to a monument; thence, North 89 degrees 58 minutes 42 seconds West 547.78 feet to a monument on the West line of that certain parcel of land as described in deed recorded in Instrument No. 200400054328, records of said county; thence on and along said West line, North 00 degrees 12 minutes 35 seconds West 1427.30 feet to a monument; thence parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter, South 89 degrees 59 minutes II seconds East 660.00 feet to the North-South Centerline of said Section 31; thence parallel with the North line of said Northwest Quarter, East 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 770.97 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described parcel contains 40.00 acres and is subject to all easements and Right-of- Ways of record. ALSO: An ingress, egress, and public utility easement (may be used for public Right-of-Way) being more particularly described as follows: That portion of the Northeast Quarter of Section 31 - Township 18 North - Range 4 East of the second principal meridian, Hamilton County, Indiana more particularly described as follows: Considering the North line of said Northeast Quarter as bearing East 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds with all bearings contained herein relative thereto. COMMENCING at the North Quarter Corner of said Section 31 monumented by a Railroad spike; thence on and along the North line of said Northeast Quarter, East 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 1011.17 feet to a PK nail on the West Right-of-Way of State Road 431; thence the next ten (10) Course and Distances being on and along said West Right-of-Way, South 00 degrees 03 minutes 55 seconds West 16.14 feet; thence, South 67 degrees 03 minutes 20 seconds East 54.27 feet to a 5/8 inch Rebar with cap (herein called "monument"); thence, South 89 degrees 56 minutes 05 seconds East 200.00 feet to a monument; thence, South 38 degrees 59 minutes 10 seconds East 16.08 feet to a monument; thence, South 38 degrees 59 minutes 10 seconds East 82.50 feet to a Metal corner post at the beginning on a non-tangent curve to the right, having a radius of 19001.59 feet, a central angle of 04 degrees 46 minutes 04 seconds, and a chord bearing South 03 degrees 07 minutes 13 seconds West 1580.77 feet; thence on and along 8 SURVEYED LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tract III (-continued- ) the arc of said curve 1581.23 feet to a monument; thence, South 05 degrees 26 minutes 50 seconds West 462.20 feet to a monument; thence, South to degrees 24 minutes 02 seconds West 150.56 feet to a monument; thence, South 01 degrees 43 minutes 42 seconds West 200.42 feet to a monument; thence, South 05 degrees 26 minutes 50 seconds West 157.45 feet to a monument on the East-West Centerline of said Section 31; thence on and along said East-West Centerline, North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 707.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of this description; thence continuing on and along said East-West Centerline, North 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds West 197.90 feet; thence perpendicular to said East-West Centerline, North 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds East 40.00 feet; thence parallel with said East-West Centerline, South 89 degrees 59 minutes 54 seconds East 162.93 feet; thence, North 81 degrees 51 minutes 49 seconds East 35.32 feet; thence perpendicular to said East-West Centerline, South 00 degrees 00 minutes 06 seconds West 45.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. The above-described parcel contains 0.18 acre and is subject to all easements and Right-of-Ways of record. I:":DSOI BDD S64847v2 9 City of Carmel Hamilton County, Indiana Final Draft . Gramercy Economic Development Plan July 7, 2006 W&J@&J~[}v ~@!J@[fiJW{fff@~ !J[fiJ@c Michael R. Shaver, President 3799 Steeplechase Drive Carmel, IN 46032 (voice) 317/872-9529 (fax) 317/872-9885 (e-mail)wabsci@aol.com Map #1: Aerial Photo of Current Mohawk Hills Development Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 2 1 i ~ , , i 1 ~ , J ~ . Gramerey . Cal'mel, IN Concep1 Site Plan. Sca'e 1-=400' Buckingham Cos. IndianapDlis, IN 01.04127.00 . DflCemb!f 23, 2005 II 175ioyot:J ?1o!o,SoiIll600 Memphis, TBf1flOlUlle381OJ Telep~ 901 521 1440 Fa~ 901 525 2760 Inlem_l: _.hk.com .."'....~ "'0I0-.Il!. _._ Go....!.." ....-,...... fv<bIf(...."_""_.......h Map #2: Proposed Configuration of Gramercy PUD/ED Area Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 3 Redevelopment/Economic Development Proposal The Gramercy project is proposed for the redevelopment of the Mohawk Hills apartment complex located on the west side of Keystone Avenue, south of l26th Street and north of Carmel Drive. The existing Mohawk Hills complex includes multi-family housing, as well as a small golf course. Specific redevelopment plans for the entire site are not yet complete but the proposal was approved by the Carmel Plan Commission on June 20, 2006, indicating that the Plan Commission has found that the Gramercy proposal conforms with the Cannel Comprehensive Plan. The Gramercy redevelopment proposal includes a mixture of commercial and high- density residential development. While the specific mix and other details of the new development are not yet final, the Cannel Redevelopment Commission (CRC) is seeking to initiate the process of designating an Economic Development Area (ED Area) on a parallel track with certain approvals by the Plan Commission and City Council. The eRe, however, may, at its sole discretion, choose at any time to withdraw the project from the ED Area designation process. While the Gramercy proposal might technically be considered a 'redevelopment' proposal, due to the fact that an existing development is being demolished and the site is being 'redeveloped,' the proposed Gramercy projcct does not advocate eminent domain activity on the part of the CRe. Since the project does not advocate eminent domain, it has been determined that the most suitable TIF-based designation is that of an Economic Development Area, rather than a redevelopment area. Statement Regarding Mohawk Hills The Mohawk Hills multi-family housing complex was considered to be on the "cutting edge" when it was first developed. One of the few multi-family complexes with its own dedicated golf course, the development offered an upscale lifestyle opportunity with generous and well-appointed living space, located along a major transportation artery connecting the development with major employment centers in Indianapolis. As is the case with every multi-family development, Mohawk Hills has reached an economic "tipping point." As has been demonstrated in every major city, multi-family housing reaches an age where the owners must either reinvest significant sums of money to restore the development/complex to market viability, or 'downscale' the development to reach a more affordable market demographic. The cost of restoring an older development to 'cutting edge' status often requires re-design of units to add square footage, major improvements to internal infrastructure (to includc such things as high- speed telecommunications), increased security, and adding other amenities. In cases such as Mohawk Hills, the cost of restoring the complex to its previous "cutting edge" status would be substantial, and may not be economically feasible without significant changes to the character of the development. As an alternative, owners often decide to invest less money into a property and squeeze the budgets to wring more short-term profit ITom the development. These alternatives Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 4 generally form a downward economic/demographic trend which can lead in the direction of urban blight. This phenomenon is altogether common throughout the nation, although it must be made clear that this ED Plan does not intend to suggest that such an outcome would be manifest here. This ED Plan does not allege that Mohawk Hills is blighted, or that it will necessarily become blighted. At the same time, it is clear that the complex no longer competes at the top of the economic scale as it once did. The age of the complex is such that major reinvestment is becoming more necessary each year. The golf course is well-maintained, but is not generally competitive with other golf opportunities in the immediate vicinity, making it harder to justify the use of the land as a golf course. Competitive pressure from the Carmel real estate market has placed a premium on certain types ofland, compelling development to become more intense and more carefully planned. All of these factors combine to indicate that Mohawk Hills is approaching a point where there is a sound public policy reason to encourage major reinvestment in this particular case. With significant new investment, the developer suggests that Mohawk Hills could become a vastly different type of development than it is at this moment. The Gramercy proposal initiates this alternative, and the CRC is prepared to explore the potential benefits of the redevelopment proposal by examining the potential for designating the Gramercy Economic Development Area. The developer/owner of Mohawk Hills has reviewed the development and has determined that Mohawk Hills has reached this economic "tipping point." Rather than allow the development to trend downward in its economic viability, however, the Gramercy proposal seeks to increase the developmental intensity of the site by rc-using land currently dedicated to the golf course, and to redevelop the site into a mixed-use PUD, blending commercial and high-density residential development. Gramercy Project Description The developer has set forth a phased-redevelopment approach to the Gramercy project. The project's proposed developmental mix is shown in Appendix A of this ED Plan. As shown in Appendix A, the developer expects taxable property to be constructed on the site beginning in March, 2008, and continuing through March, 20t 9. The Gramercy project proposes to demolish 564 existing apartment units (Mohawk Hills) and as shown in Appendix A, to replace those apartment units with approximately 2,268 high-density residential units, broken down as follows: . 726 rental/apartment units; . 862 condominiums/flats; . 635 townhomes; . 45 "live/work" spaces: . 78.950 s.t. of retail development; . 40,000 s. f. of office development; . 120,000 s. f. of hotel development: and . e parking garage. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 5 The developer estimates that the proposed development will have a "build-out value of $300 to $500 million, and is expected to take eight to twelve years to complete." Graphics of the Gramercy project (see Maps #1 & #2, above) are those also reviewed and approved by the Plan Commission. If additional detail regarding the development is desired, the reader can consult the documents submitted to and approved by the Carmel Plan Commission. The Plan Commission documentation has been used by the CRC as a basis for reviewing the project and developing this ED Plan, with the assumption that commitments made to the Plan Commission are subsequently also considered commitments made to the CRC. Maps Supporting the Economic Development Plan The ED Plan contains two maps showing the proposed ED Area and the proposed Gramercy development, identified as Map # I and Map #2, with labels. These maps were provided by the developer and, to assure conformity with the Plan Commission documents, were included in the public submittals to the Plan Commission. The CRC uses the same documents as those considered by the Plan Commission in order to assure conformity of the ED Plan and other CRC actions with the overall plan of development of the community, at large (as required by statute). Purpose of the ED Area Designation The purpose of the ED Area designation is to enable the developer to recoup a portion of the cost of redevelopment through the use ofTilx Increment Financing (TlF). The CRC and the City of Carmel have discretion over which projects might be approved for TIF expenditure, as well as controlling how much funding those projects might receive. The Mohawk Hills/Gramercy area has not previously been designated as an ED or Redevelopment (RD) Area, and as such, no previous commitments or projections have been made with regard to the property/parcels described below. Description of the Proposed Economic Development Area The proposed Gramercy Economic Development Area is described as follows for purposes of designation by the Hamilton County Auditor: Beginning at the point of intersection of the west right of way line of US431 (a.k.a. Keystone Avenue), with the south right of way line of 126" Street In Carmel, IN; Then proceeding southward along the west right of way line of US431 (a.k.a. Keystone Avenue), which also forms the eastern boundary of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-003.000, to the southeast corner of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-003.000, The turning westward along the southern boundary of parcels numbered 16-10-31-00-00- 003.000, 16-10-31-00-00-002.000, and 16-10-31-00-00-002.001, to the southwest corner of parcel 16-10-31-00-00-002.001, Then turning northward along the western boundary of parcels numbered 16-10-31-00- 00-002.001,16-10-31-00-00-002.000 and 16-10-31-00-00-001.000 to the point of intersection with the southern right of way line of 126" Street, Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 6 Then turning eastward along the southern right of way line of 126'h Street to the point of beginning. The above description containing four parcels, according to the online records of the Hamilton County Auditor, including parcels numbered: 16-10-31-00-00-001.000 16-10-31-00-00-002.000 16-10-31-00-00-002.001 16-10-31-00-00-003.000 TAX ALLOCA TION AREAS TO BE DECLARED SEPARA TEL Y The CRC, reserves the right to designate Tax Allocation Areas for the project in accordance with the criteria of the City and the CRC, and as such, specific Tax Allocation Areas may be declared separately on the basis of the sequence of development of the final project, as ultimately approved by the Plan Commission, City Council and CRe. Statutory Findings of Fact: Gramercy In accordance with IC36-7-14-41, the Carmel Redevelopment Commission (CRC) offers the following findings of fact: 1. The plan for the Economic Development Area: promotes significant opportunities for the gainful employment of its citizens; attracts major new business enterprise to the unit (of government); retains or expands a significant business enterprise existing in the unit, or; meets other purposes of redevelopment and economic development. 2. The plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved by regulatory processes, or by the ordinary operation of private enterprise because of: lack of public improvements, existence of improvements or conditions that lower the value of land below that of nearby land; multiple ownership of land; or other similar conditions. 3. The public health and welfare will be benefited by the plan for the economic development of the area. 4. The accomplishment of the plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by: the attraction or retention of permanent jobs; an increase in the property tax base; improvement to the diversity of the economic base; or other similar benefits. 5. The plan for the Economic Development area conforms to other development and redevelopment plans of the unit. Finding of Fact #1a: ~he plan promotes opportunities for employment...' The current land uses of the four parcels within the proposed ED Area include multi- family housing and a small golf course. The Gramercy redevelopment proposal includes adding commercial land uses to the site, as well as changing the configuration and mix of housing types. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 7 The conversion of these four parcels to a multi-use redevelopment, including commercial parcels will generate new employment opportunities for citizens of Carmel and of nearby communities. Previous studies have noted that north-bound traffic on US31 and US431 has grown at rates greater than south-bound traffic. This phenomenon is largely due to a northward shift in employment patterns, making Carmel an employment center in its own right (and reducing economic dependency on Indianapolis as the primary employment center). As the Carmel employment center grows, it becomes more feasible for citizens of northern Hamilton County to commute to jobs in Carmel, such as those which might be created at Gramercy. The average commute time for Hamilton County workers is approximately 20-25 minutes (depending upon community), according to census information. In order to encourage the economic growth of jobs in Hamilton County, it will be necessary to develop and redevelop existing sites in Carmel and other parts of Hamilton County. The Gramercy proposal potentially represents one of those opportunities, creating jobs in the commercial portions of the proposed development, as well as jobs in the multi-family housing portion of the proposed development. In addition, Gramercy represents a significant opportunity to create and sustain construction jobs necessary to demolish the existing development and build the proposed development. While demographers sometimes refer to construction jobs as "temporary" it should be noted that the construction jobs at Gramercy are expected to remain on-site for up to 12 years, according to the proposed project schedule. Finally, the proposed project also represents the opportunity for the creation of jobs in property management and maintenance on a permanent basis, as well as the potential for long-term attraction and retention of professional jobs located in any office buildings which might be developed at Gramercy. Gramercy's location along a major transportation corridor provides an ideal location for professional office development, which is very compatible with land uses to the south that are already fully developed. It should be clear from the above discussion that the proposed Gramercy development has the potential to create/retain permanent professional and other commercial jobs at several levels, as well as long-term construction jobs, thus meeting the statutory requirements of this finding offact. Finding of Fact #1b: '...attracts a major business enterprise...' The proposed Gramercy project is designed to assist in sustaining economic growth in Carmel. It is important to understand that economic growth occurs in many forms and has many attributes which the real estate market must accommodate. Growing businesses must constantly expand their operations in a number of ways, including new office and/or retail space. In some cases, these growing businesses can be expanded at their existing locations, and in other cases, the existing location cannot accommodate the needs of certain growing businesses. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 8 In other cases, businesses grow in economic impact through new technology and increased productivity. Again, these growing businesses find that their cxisting location may not be able to meet the need for such things as broadband infrastructure, or other high-speed telecommunications facilities, which help to make the existing work force more productive. These increases in productivity enable companies to improve and adapt their products to remain competitive in the marketplace. The creation/development of new commercial space, with enhanced infrastructure, enhances the capacity of a city to capture and retain these types of businesses, both from inside of Carmel and from places like Indianapolis. In other cases, new businesses are spun off from existing businesses for an assortment of reasons, including profitability, specialization, and market share. Overall, the dynamics of the local economy eventually manifest themsclves into the real estate market, but in each case, as these growing and spin-off businesses become established, and as their operating needs evolve, the development of new, 'cutting edge' commercial space enhances the capacity of a city to capture and retain those businesses and the jobs that accompany them. In fact, many of the businesses in Carmel have relocated there from Indianapolis, or have relocated to Carmel as a result of business spin-offs or other entrepreneurial action. It is appropriate to add a further note regarding the location of Gramercy. The US431 corridor carries huge amounts of traffic and is, in fact, programmed for major improvements in the next 10 years. This large volume of traffic makes the corridor suitable for increased commercial development which can enjoy and optimize the high- visibility character of the site. This attribute, we believe, enhances the capacity of the proposed Gramercy development to capture major new business enterprises by offering them space with the finest amenities, the easiest access, and the highest visibility. Based on the promise of creating/developing new commercial space in a location ideally suited to commercial development, the CRC has determined that the Gramercy proposal will, in fact, increase the capacity of the City to attract one or more major new business enterprises to the City, thereby meeting the requirements of this statutory finding. Finding of Fact #1 c: '.. .retains or expands business enterprise existing in the unit...' As noted in the explanation above, the Gramercy redevelopment proposal indicates that the existing Mohawk Hills site can be redeveloped to compete in the modem marketplace. The combination of commercial, retail and residential space is to be configured specifically to mect the sophisticated dcmands of the 21 sl century professional and intellectual workforce, including cutting-edge broadband access, live-work accommodations and other high-quality amenities being sought by professionals of all ages. The Carmel Plan Commission is currently considering the Gramercy development in order to assure that it conforms to the overall plan of development of the community. There is no question that Carmel is a city of high-end economic growth. Carmel residents have a higher than normal likelihood of becoming entrepreneurs, themselves, or Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 9 investing in entrepreneurial enterprises. The economic cycle is not stagnant. This constant, cyclical economic stimulus manifests itself in the real estate market by demanding new office, retail and other commercial spaces, configured specifically for the purpose of meeting the needs of growth companies, as well as entrepreneurs. While some of these needs are generic, many of those needs are very idiosyncratic, requiring special configuration in order to optimize operational efficiencies. As new space is configured to accommodate more sophisticated requirements, older space is vacated for remodeling and updating. During this interim, existing landlords determine how and whether the older space requires major reinvestment, especially with regard to such things as high-speed telecommunications and broadband infrastructure, which not only increases corporate efficiency, but improves product and service quality. The proposed Gramercy project fits this paradigm. Although Mohawk Hills is currently a multi-family housing complex, the redevelopment proposal is expected to provide a range of commercial and retail land use types which would accommodate growing businesses and entrepreneurs in the Carmel area. By providing new space, configured specifically to meet the highly-refined needs of these growing businesses as well as new entrepreneurs, existing commercial space in Carmel can be reconfigured and updated to offer newer technology, high-speed telecommunications, and other operating efficiencies so that the existing space can return to a competitive market position. The Gramercy redevelopment proposal offers Carmel the opportunity to redevelop an existing space to remain competitive in the business real estate marketplace. The combination of commercial, retail and residential redevelopment is expected to enable more Carmel entrepreneurs to manifest their ideas into the marketplace, as well as enabling Carmel to retain existing growth businesses that might otherwise have left Carmel because existing space could not meet their highly-specialized and sophisticated needs. Equally importantly, the introduction of new commercial and retail space will enable and encourage the owners of existing retail/commercial space to reinvest in their property, making those existing developments less susceptible to long term decay and urban blight, which benefits the entire community. For these reasons, the CRC has concluded that the creation of the Gramercy ED Area will help Carmel to retain growing businesses, allowing them to expand within Carmel, while increasing technological efficiencies which will enable Carmel businesses to compete effectively in the global marketplace. These activities have the effect of retaining and expanding existing business enterprise in the City of Carmel. As such, the CRC concludes that this statutory finding of fact is satisfied. Finding of Fact #1d: '.. .meets other purposes of redevelopment and economic development.. .' This statutory finding of fact is important to the Gramercy redevelopment proposal in several ways. First, this finding of fact specifically connects "redevelopment and economic development," addressing both opportunities within the same proposal. Gramercy is both an economic development project and a redevelopment project, at the same time, and this section of the statute addresses this connection. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 10 The Gramercy proposal will redevelop an existing multi-family housing complex, which is approaching its 'tipping point' in terms ofthe need for significant reinvestment. If the old Mohawk Hills apartment complex does not receive significant new investment, the demographics of the development could easily change. Such a demographic change will likely be gradual and occur over time, but is likely, given similar lessons of history, to lead to economic decline and urban blight for the area. A proposal such as the Gramercy proposal fundamentally provides assurance that the new investment will curtail any economic decline, and restore the site as a high-quality development. As such, the Gramercy project meets the 'other purposes of redevelopment and economic development' clause in the statute. In other communities, multi-family housing complexes are too often allowed to deteriorate, receiving insufficient new investment, becoming a blight on the community, and negatively affecting the personal wealth and value of the neighborhood. The real estate industry is virtually predicated on the assertion that location is the paramount consideration. Consequently, locations which are close to blighted property are also likely to be adversely affected by such deterioration and lack of new investment. It is an irony that individual residents may oppose a proposal to redevelop a property, simply (and sometimes unreasonably) demanding that nothing be allowed to change. Such opposition often proves later to be counter-productive to the economic interests of those same residents. Consider the example of the Monon Trail, where the proposal to redevelop the property was greeted with heated individual rhetoric from people living along the Monon Trail, vigorously opposing the conversion of the old railroad into a bike/pedestrian path. Many of those individuals complained that their property value would be adversely affected by the pathway project. Now, a decade after those acrimonious exchanges, when a property adjacent to the Monon Trail is set for sale, the owner virtually always notes that the property is "on the Manon. " often with a premium attached to the price, indicating that both the owner and the general market acknowledge that the Monon Trail was a benefit to the property, despite the original rhetoric. The point of this discussion is to note that redevelopment projects often accomplish "other purposes of redevelopment and economic development," including obviation of blighting influences on the surrounding neighborhood, the restoration of market viability and enhancement of the property value (and tax base) of the general area, even though such arguments are often discounted by neighbors. Redevelopment proposals like Gramercy meet these 'other purposes' of redevelopment and economic development in several ways, as explained above. The act of implementing significant reinvestment reduces the potential for future blight. Clearly, at some point (if not now), Mohawk Hills will require significant reinvestment, and the result of that reinvestment will change the existing development, and will reduce the potential for urban blight at this location, while simultaneously preserving property values in the surrounding area. Therefore, the Grarnercy proposal meets these 'other purposes' by assuring the reinvestment that is required to make the site function Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 11 competitively in the local economy, thus meeting the requirements of this statutory finding. Finding of Fact #2a: The plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved by regulatory processes. . .. ' The Gramercy proposal cannot be achieved by the regulatory processes. Redevelopment of real estate in the current legal framework ofIndiana statutes is an expensive and . prolonged task under the best of circumstances. In this case, the enforcement of regulations and local ordinances would not succeed in generating the magnitude of new development and redevelopment that Gramercy offers. It should be understood that the potential relief afforded by the regulatory processes to accomplish economic development goals is largely terminated by the approval of the original development by a plan commission and/or city council. At such time as the Mohawk Hills complex was originally approved, the opportunity for changing that development through regulatory processes was ended. Once the approval is rendered, regulation can no longer significantly affect the nature or character of the development. By definition, this means that the plan for development (changing the configuration of Mohawk Hills) cannot be achieved through the regulatory processes. Once Mohawk Hills became an apartment complex, the regulatory processes are powerless to fundamentally change that use without the express consent of the owner. The regulatory processes are also not useful in forcing reinvestment in an existing development, unless and until that existing development becomes egregious in violating local ordinances. Certainly, a city can enforce minimum health and safety codes through the regulatory processes. The problem is that, by the time that these codes are violated and the regulatory processes are prosecuted, the existing development has generally become a significant problem for the community. In a community with the high-quality of life that exists in Carmel, there is substantially greater advantage to the community to develop viable partnerships with developers to achieve change than to attempt to use the legal/regulatory system to force change. It is the position ofthe CRC that the plan for the proposed Gramercy Economic Development Area cannot be achieved by the regulatory processes. Despite the fact that the entire development has not yet been fully approved, the CRC has reasonably determined that the partnership between the CRC and the Gramercy developer can achieve far more in terms of economic development and redevelopment benefit than can be achieved through any regulatory processes, especially regulatory processes that are adversarial in nature. For these reasons, the CRC finds that this statutory finding of fact is satisfied. Finding of Fact #2b: The plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved by... the ordinary operation of private enterprise because of lack of public improvements....' The public improvements which were installed to support the Mohawk Hills development will not be suitable to optimizing the economic development and redevelopment impact Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 12 of the Gramercy proposal. Therefore, in order to support the plan for the proposed Economic Development Area, it will be necessary for the CRC to assist in providing new public improvements which appropriately support the Gramercy project. The 'ordinary operation of private enterprise' is a somewhat ambiguous term that must be defined in a manner appropriate to its applicable context. What might be 'ordinary' for Carmel might not be 'ordinary' for Indianapolis or Noblesville. For Carmel and the CRC, the 'ordinary operation of private enterprise' has been determined to mean those activities that would reasonably be expected to continue if a development were to simply change ownership. In this case, the 'ordinary operation of private enterprise' determination would be applied to Mohawk Hills!Gramercy to mean that Mohawk Hills would continue to operate as an apartment complex, with a small golf course. If the Gramercy development were to simply propose to remodel the existing apartments, the CRC would not be likely to be interested in supporting the owner with the designation of an Economic Development Area, or the expenditure ofTIF revenues. In fact, it is the position of the CRC that the Gramercy proposal substantially exceeds the 'normal operation of private enterprise,' by proposing an entirely new mix of residential and commercial uses, as well as millions of dollars of new construction. In this case, the Grarnercy development cannot be accomplished by the ordinary operation of private enterprise, regardless of the issue of public improvements. The Gramercy proposal contains virtually all new public improvements, including streets, sewers, water lines, and other infrastructure. These new infrastructure systems would not be economically feasible while the developer is also responsible for acquisition of the existing development, the cost of demolition, and the lost revenues caused by revenue years lost during construction. Due to these considerations, the CRC finds that the Gramercy Economic Development Plan proposal cannot be achieved through the normal operation of private enterprise due to a lack of public improvements which are configured in a manner that optimally supports the proposed new development. Finding of Fact #2c: The plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved because of.. . existence of improvements or conditions that lower the value of land below that of nearby land....' It is also worth noting that the fundamental principle ofTIF is that the resulting/proposed development has a higher value than the existing development. If the new development does not achieve higher property values than the existing development, there will be no tax increment to finance. Consequently, by this measure, any project which successfully generates TIF (or at least a developer's guarantee based on reasonable TIP assumptions) meets this statutory finding of fact. In other words, if a proposed development generates tax increment revenues, then that development has a higher value ofland (and improvements) than the existing development. When conditions exist that demonstrate that existing improvements have a lower value than could be achieved if the new development proposal were implemented, this finding of fact is arguably fulfilled. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 13 The existing Mohawk Hills development is approaching an age where substantial new investment has traditionally been required in order for the development to remain economically viable. While the existing development is not dilapidated or blighted, the existing owner acknowledges that the quality of nearby development generates an economic opportunity which would substantially improve the value ofthe existing site, as well as having a positive economic impact on nearby properties. When Mohawk Hills was first developcd, it was very rare for an apartment community to offer golf as an amenity, and the presence of this golf amenity gave Mohawk Hills prestige. Over the years, new apartment developments offered larger living units with more and better appliances, while new golf courses were built nearby with more challenging designs. Since there are other golf course alternatives nearby, the Mohawk Hills golf course is not attractive to many golfers. The impact of this lack of market competitiveness is that there are other uses ofthe golf course land that are more economically productive and profitable than the current use. The sum of these competing market forces is that the current configuration of Mohawk Hills is now considered to have under-utilized land in the golf course. The golf course is an "improvement" on the real estate, and the configuration of the land (and buildings on the land) is a "condition" of the property. By committing such a large proportion of the site to an under-performing golf course, the CRC acknowledges that the value of the Mohawk Hills development, in its current condition, is lower than that of a comparable amount of nearby land that is more optimally developed. In its most simple form, by removing the existing apartments, and developing the golf course into more intense (and more carefully planned) land uses, a new development mix can be achieved which exploits more of the full potential value of the site. This is essentially what Gramercy provides to the CRe. The current configuration of the site creates a value that is less than that of the mixed use commercial area immediately to the south. Therefore, the CRC finds that conditions exist within the Mohawk Hills site which could be addressed such that the value ofthe land/development is dramatically improved, and in this finding determines that this portion of the statute is fulfilled. Finding of Fact #2d: The plan for the Economic Development Area cannot be achieved because of.. .other similar conditions. ' The plan for the economic development of the proposed Gramercy Economic Development Area cannot be achieved unless the CRC designates the Gramercy ED Area, and then approves the Tax Allocation Area necessary to support a TIF commitment by the CRe. The precise terms of this TIF commitment have not yet been finalized, in the same fashion as the final Gramercy development proposal has not yet been finalized and approved. As stated previously, the CRC reserves the right to terminate discussions of this ED Area designation and or the Tax Allocation Area designation at any time, at the sole discretion of the CRe. However, having stated these caveats, the CRC recognizes that the Gramercy proposal represents substantially more economic development than is present with the Mohawk Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 14 Hills apartment complex, in terms of potential commercial and professional jobs located on the site, potential long-term construction jobs present on the site, investment in new real estate development on the site, and generating greater urban developmental intensity than is currently present (by redeveloping the golf course). The CRC was invited to this partnership by the Gramercy developer. Based on the review of the project by the CRC, the CRC has determined that the benefits of achieving a greater developmental intensity through demolition of the existing development and construction of a new, mixed-use development are significant enough to justify the investment of CRC resources in this partnership. The CRC asserts that these considerations represent "other similar conditions," as cited in statute, and thereby meets the terms of this statutory finding. Finding of Fact #3: The public health and welfare will be benefited by the plan for the economic development of the area.' The CRe has determined that the Gramercy proposal will benefit the public health and welfare in several ways. First, the public welfare will be benefited by the provision of new employment opportunities in the commercial and retail spaces to be developed as part of Gramercy. Second, the public welfare will be benefited by the act of investing in the redevelopment of an existing site, as opposed to the development of undeveloped cornfields which contribute to urban sprawl. Third, the public health is benefited by the fact that redevelopment of existing areas reduces the pollution caused by increased automobile travel which accompanies sprawl. Fourth, the public welfare is benefited by reinvestment and redevelopment prior to the existence of egregious levels of urban blight which would require more resources and more dramatic action to reclaim the neighborhoods. This concept also extends benefits to other, adjacent property, which will not be subjected to blighting economic factors caused by a long-term economic decline at Mohawk Hills, because Gramercy was implemented. Fifth, the public welfare is benefited by expanding existing commercial areas to meet local needs, rather than creating new, suburban and ex-urban shopping areas. When commercial investment is contained in an existing area - especially an existing commercial area along a major transportation artery - the community's developmental character is preserved, which is a significant benefit to public welfare. Finding of Fact #4a: The accomplishment of the plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by... the attraction or retention of permanent jobs.. .. " This Finding of Fact is similar in characterto the requirements of Findings # 1 a through #Ic, and as such, all relevant arguments for those previous findings are hereby incorporated in Finding of Fact #4a. Findings of Fact #Ia through #Ic relates to opportunities for gainful employment and attractions/retention of business. Finding of Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 15 Fact #4 relates to the "public utility" of attract ingl retaining permanent jobs. We find this distinction to be small and possibly insignificant to the general public, whom this ED Plan is generally intended to inform. As stated in several prior instances, the Gramercy development proposal suggests that a mixed use development with a substantial contribution of commercial/retail uses, as well as residential uses, will attract/retain jobs in Carmel that might otherwise be lost. Growing companies often cannot grow without changing loeations. The presence of Gramercy will provide growing businesses with an alternative remaining in Carmel. In addition, the competitive presence of Gramercy also has other 'public utility' to the community. The existence of competing commercial space generally prevents landlords from disproportionate increases in rents. Owners of old buildings must make improvements in order to remain competitive in the market. Businesses needing certain amenities for optimal production have a higher likelihood of achieving these amenities due to the presence of a multitude of alternatives. Redevelopment of existing property near other commercial and residential development provides a developmental transition which is close to existing employees. Carmel's local economy is expanding. It is therefore proper to meet the needs of an expanding economy by expanding the opportunity to locate those business and employment opportunities in the same community from which they originated. New entrepreneurs are emerging from the ranks of young professionals, and many of those professionals already live in Carmel. Thus, the fact that Gramercy will offer competing space for office and retail development affords these people an opportunity to express their entrepreneurial spirit without a 45-minute drive to Indianapolis. As late as 1985, entrepreneurs living in Carmel were often required to travel to Indianapolis for their business needs. Through projects like Gramercy, this is no longer the case. The CRC finds that the terms of this statutory finding are met through the new business and employment opportunities which the Gramercy project intends to facilitate. Finding of Fact #4b: The accomplishment of the plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by.. .an increase in the property tax base....' The CRe finds that the Gramercy ED Area proposal will contribute to the property tax base of the City by increasing the intensity of development at the Mohawk Hills complex, and reconfiguration of the development mix to respond to changes caused by growth in the local economy. As stated previously, when Mohawk Hills was originally developed, it met the demands of a high-end market demographic. Over time, Mohawk Hills has not been able to maintain that demographic, due to increased competition from new developments, as well as the increasing need for major new investment. The Gramercy proposal will redevelop the golf course property (as well as the existing apartment complex) into a carefully-planned, mixed use development. The proposal to redevelop the golf course alone, would increase the property tax base of the community. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 16 According to documents submitted by the developer, and reviewed by CRe and Plan Commission professionals and members, the proposal to redevelop the entire site, including removal of the old apartments, will generate a long-term increase in Carmel's property tax base, which is likely to last more than a decade. One final note is appropriate. In addition to the fundamental increases in the property tax base which are directly caused by the new development, the Gramercy redevelopment proposal also negates the potential for blighting influences to spread, reducing the value of nearby neighborhoods. Such an outcome is a projected secondary benefit to the Gramercy project, which indirectly meets the requirements of this finding of fact. Finding of Fact #4c: 'The accomplishment of the plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by.. .improving the diversity of the economic base. . . ' This finding also closely emulates various previous findings of fact and the arguments supporting those findings. The statutory language 'improving the diversity of the economic base' is interpreted by the CRC to refer to the need for many employment opportunities and a broad range of business interests within the community, in order to support the local economy, even when one or more business sectors are cyclically depressed. The CRC finds that the Gramercy ED proposal meets this finding of fact. Indiana's statewide economy has suffered heavily since 2000. Indiana is acknowledged nationally as a "rust belt" state, which is 'too heavily dependent on the automotive industry.' Cities like Anderson, Muncie and Marion, which have failed to diversify their local economies, have suffered heavily when their core industries have contracted. Carmel therefore greets proposals such as Gramercy as an opportunity to diversify the local economy by increasing the opportunity to capture high-paying, high-education, high-intellectual capital jobs, and to foster a supportive environment for small business. Carmel has never been a manufacturing-dependent community. In fact, since 1980 Carmel has been successful in attracting corporate headquarters, professional firms, and companies specializing in intellectual capital investment. In many cases, Carmel out- competes Indianapolis for those jobs. Consequently, even when Carmel's most famous corporate citizen, Conseco, fell on hard times, the diversity ofthe local economy was such that the economic ripples, while significant, did not have a substantial impact on the community at large. The Gramercy project is expected to enable the local economy to diversify by providing new opportunities to capture or retain jobs through market competition and sophisticated infrastructure to improve productivity. Gramercy, and projects like it, are expected to allow Carmel to continue its reputation as a community which attracts and retains successful executives, entrepreneurs and business people of all types. With projects like Gramercy, Carmel and the CRC expect the city to continue to grow in significance as an employment center separate from Indianapolis. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 17 The developer and H. J. Umbaugh have also indicated that the proposed project will generate an increase in COlT revenues to the County and the City (see "Economic Development Strategy: COlT Enhancement," below). The Gramercy proposal includes 2,268 housing units, which represents an increase of 1,704 units over the existing number of units at Mohawk Hills. In addition, it is projected that the occupants of the Gramercy housing units will have higher household incomes than are currently present. While there continue to be questions regarding the amount and timing of COlT distributions at the State level, both of these factors (an increased number of housing units and a higher projected household income) would logically result in increased COlT revenues to the County and City. H. J. Umbaugh projects that the Gramercy project could increase COlT rcvcnucs to the County by $2.2M per year and to the City by approximately $0.5M per year. Finding of Fact #4d: 'The accomplishment of the plan for the Economic Development Area will be a public utility and benefit as measured by.. .other similar benefits. The CRC finds that the proposed Gramercy ED Area has several benefits to the community, other than those cited specifically in statute. First, the Gramercy proposal expands the commercial (retail and office) space availability for the community, as a whole, thereby increasing the competitive aspects ofthe market. When competition increases, local businesses get a better deal, have more control of their operating costs, and have the opportunity to be more profitable overall. Competition also assures that existing space must remain competitive with new space, in terms of rents and amenities. Second, the CRC finds that the location of the proposed Gramercy project is ideal. The project is located adjacent to the city's largest concentration of commercial/retail space (between Carmel Drive and ll6th Street). The Gramercy proposal allows Carmel's commercial/retail development to expand at an existing location, rather than creating new locations, scattered around the community. This type of redevelopment ultimately reduces urban sprawl. Third, the proposed Gramercy project is located on a major state highway. This potentially reduces the City's cost of thoroughfare expansion resulting from increased commercial activity. Fourth, the presence of Gramcrcy potentially enables Carmel to capture a larger share of commercial trade within its own corporate boundaries. For example, the entire Keystone at the Crossing commercial center is largely supported by Carmel residents, even though it is located in Indianapolis. The CRC believes that the presence of Gramercy will enable Carmel to capture an incrementally larger share of its own household expenditures, as well as job creation, thereby secondarily enabling Carmel markets to respond directly to the demands of Carmel residents, rather than 'blending' Carmel demands with those of Indianapolis and addressing the aggregate demand. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 18 Fifth, the growth in new business in Carmel expands the local economy. As alluded to previously, Carmel is the residential home ofa high proportion of executives, managers and business leaders. The ranks of executives, managers and business leaders also happen to be a prime source of entrepreneurs, who in turn create new businesses. By expanding the offering and availability of commercial space, those businesses - old businesses, growing businesses and new businesses - can expand and grow in Carmel, rather than being forced to find space elsewhere, with the business leaders locating their businesses closer to home, with less commuting time and less pollution. All of these factors are considered to be viable "other" reasons for the CRC to support the proposed Gramercy ED Plan. Finding of Fact #5: The plan for the Economic Development Area conforms to other development and redevelopment plans of the unit....' The CRC took its initial action on this ED Plan and the proposal to designate the Gramercy ED Area after the Carmel Plan Commission approved the Gramercy project on June 20,2006. By deferring action on the ED Area designation until after the Plan Commission approval, the eRC can assure the public that the project conforms to the overall plan of development of the city. Clearly, the Cannel Plan Commission's role is to review development proposals, suggest! negotiate modifications appropriate to the best interests of the community, and ultimately approve only those proposals which confonn to the development and redevelopment plans of the community. In fact, it is the position of the CRC that the approval ofa development proposal by the Plan Commission is a direct and formal affirmation that the proposed development does, in fact, conform to the development and redevelopment plans of the community. The developer has been working with the Plan Commission for an extcndcd period of time prior to the Plan Commission approval of the Gramercy project at its June 20, 2006, meeting. The CRC has undertaken the development of the Gramercy ED Plan on a parallel track, based on the representations of the developer, as well as the quality of previous developments undertaken and implemented by the developer. Based on the Gramercy project approval by the Carmel Plan Commission, the CRC will take appropriate action to approve this ED Plan, as well as other documents appropriate to the initiation of the ED Area designation process. As the ED Area designation process concludes, the CRC will also afford the Plan Commission the opportunity to review the specific ED Area designation, as well as supporting documents, in order to absolutely affirm conformity with other plans of development and redevelopment, and the CRC will not continue the ED Area designation process until this affirmation is received from the Plan Commission. Economic Development Strategy The Economic Development Strategy for the Gramercy ED Area revolves around the redevelopment plan which was approved by the Carmel Plan Commission on June 20, Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 19 2006. The Plan Commission approval is considered by the CRC to constitute primary evidence that the proposed project conforms to the plan of development for the city of Carmel, however, the CRC will formally affirm this conclusion by presenting the ED Plan to the Plan Commission separately, after the ED Plan has been approved by the CRC. Property Tax, A V & TIF: Projections & Strategy H. J. Umbaugh, acting as Financial Advisors for the developer, have prepared initial estimates of the property tax impacts of the proposed Gramercy development. H. J. Umbaugh has determined that the base A V for the Mohawk Hills complex is approximately S28M. The developer has indicated that the completed Gramercy project will have a "build-out value" (term used by the developer) of$300M to $500M, and H. 1. Umbaugh has indicated that the completed project will have a projected A V of approximately $275M, based on assessment parameters used by Umbaugh. The Gramercy project is projected to require more than 10 years to complete, with the developer's projection that the final phase will bc completed by March 1,2019. This project phasing will have an obvious impact on TIF revenue streams, and must be considered by the CRC/City in shaping any TIF financing. COlT Enhancement The developer's Financial Advisor, H. J. Umbaugh has also prepared an estimate of potential new COlT revenue to be generated by the project, based on the developer's projections of income for residential units proposed as part ofthe Gramercy project. The table below reflects the COlT projection provided by H. J. Umbaugh. The method of projection approximately nets the number of existing units at Mohawk hills (564) against the total number of Gramercy's proposed housing units (2,268) for a net increase of 1,700 units, which the developer is projecting will all come from outside of Hamilton County, and thus would represent new COlT revenue for the County and City. Estimates/projections of "average median" household income by household types wcre provided by the developer. Clearly, the table below reflects the developer's intent that the housing component of Gramercy is not focused on family housing (only 90 of2,268 units are projected for families), but rather on young professionals and empty nester/retirees. The Gramercy design appears consistent with such a unit mix, focusing on high locational visibility and easy access to offices/employment and shopping, which are commonly considered market preferences by these demographic groups. At the same time, it should be understood that the projections of future performance provided by Umbaugh, or any other consultant, are intended purely for illustrative purposes and do not represent any guarantee of future performance, especially considering the current questions swirling around the COlT distributions by the State. Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 20 Household Types Empty Nesters & Retirees Estimated Additional Annual COlT # ot new Households trom Outside Hamilton County Average Median Income. Estimated Additional Annual Income 260 $156,000 $40,560,000 Estimated Additional Annual COlT (total) $405,600 Estimated Additional Annual COlT (city) $93,000 Traditional & Non-Traditional Famiiies 90 $178,000 $16,020,000 $160,200 $37,000 Younger Singles & Couples 1,350 $125,000 $168,750,000 $1,687,500 $387,000 Totals 1,700" $225,330,000 $2,253,300 $517,000 . the term "average median" is likely an unintended misnomer. The tenns Uaverage" and "median" have similar mathematical application, however the combination of both terms appears redundant. We are certain this is inadvertent. ... the Umbaugh calculations table presents a "total" of the "average median incqrnes" as $459.000, which appears to be a typographical error. While it is possible to compute the sum of three averages, such a number, in this case has questionable mathematical meaning. Regardless of the projection method, it would appear that the Gramercy proposal increases the number of housing units located on this site by over 400%, which logically suggests that some of those housing units will be occupied by new Hamilton County households. Economic Development Projects The CRe's partnership with Buckingham includes consideration ofTIF funding for the following projects and estimated costs. It should be noted that all estimated project costs are subject to confirmation and review by the CRC at the time of funding, as well as being potentially subject to limitations placed on TIF funding by the CRC, in its sole discretion. Preliminary Estimate of Gramercy TIF Projects & Costs Cost Item Estimated Cost Streets, curbs, paths, lighting, demolition, stormwater management, soft $ 12,000,000 costs, etc. Public open spaces & parks $ 2,600,000 Public parking garage $ 4,000,000 thS $ 700,000 126 treet Improvements Auman Neighborhood Improvements $ 700,000 Total Estimated Project Costs $ 20,000,000 PUBLIC PARKING GARAGE Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 21 The developer has requested that the CRC consider providing TIF funding for a public parking garage in the preliminary amount of $4M. This garage would enable the developer to increase the developmental intensity of the site by reducing the amount of land consumed by surface parking. This increased developmental intensity is consistent with the overall trend toward increased urban densities which is being proposed and supported by the Carmel Plan Commission (as affirmed by the approval of the Gramercy PUD proposal by the Carmel Plan commission on June 20, 2006). IMPROVEMENTS TO 126TH STREET The developer has included a preliminary amount of $0. 7M for providing improvements to 126th Street at the north end of the Gramercy development. The increased developmental intensity is projected to increase traffic on local thoroughfares, and this set-aside ofTIF funding is intended to address those traffic issues and problems. IMPROVEMENTS TO AUMAN NEIGHBORHOOD The developer has also requested that the CRC consider providing an estimated $0.7M in TIF funding for the mitigation of potential developmental impacts on the Auman neighborhood which might be caused by the Gramercy development. PUBLIC OPEN SPACES & PARKS The Gramercy development proposal includes setting aside portions of the property for public amenities, such as public open spaces, green areas and parks. The developer has requested that the CRC consider designating approximately $2.6M for the development of these public spaces as part of the TIF contribution to the project. STREET, CURBS, SOFT COSTS, ETC. The developer has requested that the City/CRC set aside $12M in TIF funding for a broad category of costs including streets, curbs, paths, storm water management, lighting and other costs. Igramercy ed plan dra 060707 Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 22 Appendix A * Mohawk Hills Redevelopment - aka Gramercy Conceptul Unit Mix. Subject to Change Mohawk Hills site only -116.6 acres 312712006 Note: Block acreages refer to developable blocks only. excludes ROWand parks Retail s.f. per acre 10,000 Rental average s.f. 1,000 IProduct mix: 0.28 0021 0.32 0.38 Phase BuJ<<& Block Acros Average Total Rental Condo Town- Live- S.f. Retail S.f. S.f.Hotel Parking occupied Res. Res. flats homos work OffIco garage by 3/1 of Density Units 1 2008 1 4.18 18 75.2 24.1 28.8 21.1 1.5 1 2008 2 2.39 18 43.0 13.8 16.3 12.0 0.9 1 2008 3 0.87 18 15.7 5.0 6.0 4.4 0.3 1 2009 7 2.43 18 43.7 14.0 16.8 12.2 0.9 1 2009 10 2 18 36.0 11.5 13.7 10.1 0.7 1 2009 15(a) 1.74 18 31.3 10.0 11.9 8.8 0.6 1 2010 11 2.65 18 47.7 15.3 18.1 13.4 1.0 1 2010 16 1.3 18 23.4 7.5 8.9 6.6 0.5 7,500 5,000 1 2010 20(a) 2.56 35 69.7 28.7 34.1 25.1 1.8 5,000 5,000 3 2012 15(b) 1.74 18 31.3 10.0 11.9 8.8 0.6 3 2012 2O(b) 1.10 25 27.5 8.8 10.4 7.7 0.5 3 2013 23 5.48 25 137.0 43.8 52.1 38.4 2.7 3 2013 24 2.75 60 165.0 52.8 62.7 46.2 3.3 3 2013 29 0.8 25 20.0 6.4 7.6 5.6 0.4 3,000 3 2014 28 3.91 25 97.8 31.3 37.1 27.4 2.0 10,000 3 2014 30 4.09 35 143.2 45.8 54.4 40.1 2.9 20.450 y 4 2015 21 1.08 35 37.8 12.1 14.4 10.6 0.8 4 2015 22 1.66 35 58.1 18.6 22.1 16.3 1.2 4 2015 25 2.37 60 142.2 45.5 54.0 39.8 2.8 4 2016 26 2.05 60 123.0 39.4 46.7 34.4 2.5 4 2016 27 2.7 35 94.5 30.2 35.9 26.5 1.9 4 2016 31 1.67 35 58.5 18.7 22.2 16.4 1.2 15,000 15.000 Y 4 2017 32 4.29 35 75.1 24.0 28.5 21.0 1.5 120,000 5 2017 4 2.07 25 51.8 16.6 19.7 14.5 1.0 5 2017 5 2.34 25 58.5 18.7 22.2 16.4 1.2 5 2017 6 1.86 25 48.5 14.9 17.7 13.0 0.9 5 2018 8 2.34 25 58.5 18.7 22.2 16.4 1.2 5,000 5 2018 9 4.07 25 101.8 32.6 38.7 28.5 2.0 5,000 5 2018 12 1.38 35 48.3 15.5 18.4 13.5 1.0 5 2018 13 2.05 35 71.8 23.0 27.3 20.1 1.4 5 2019 14 1.63 35 57.1 18.3 21.7 16.0 1.1 5 2019 17 1.2 35 42.0 13.4 16.0 11.8 0.8 8.000 15,000 5 2019 18 2.51 35 87.9 28.1 33.4 24.6 1.8 5 2019 19 0.8 35 28.0 9.0 10.6 7.8 0.6 I TOTAL 78.06 2,268 726 862 635 45 78,950 40,000 120,000 . document provided by Buckingham Properties Gramercy Economic Development Plan: Draft (060707) 23