Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutKeltner Corporate CenterAPPLICATION FOR ARCIIITECTVRAL DESIGN, LIGHTING AND SIGNAGIP, ADLS Naine of Project: 4-a rma Olie'a t3v/t-0/NF Site Address: wesr C4A1V G AQI ✓E 41 MEN SEP 18 1,996 DOGD Tvpe of Project: ofF/�E wA.ee NovsE Applicant: K-OL-TAFA Peo?"3705 Phone: HY- o510 Contact Persoti: FCC, KEcrIIJEA Phone: Syy- oye Address: 70 It AVf*! H0 , Wm6L., XA/ 116 c 3Z. Legal Description: MANN'- TEcH,vocooY PA,cK , s4E A77Ar-Hm pARr Sr BtvcK ly LEbAL To a 94WcM0 wAW dvwcem Area: Z. /Y Ac . Zoning: Owner of real estate: net-w R PtiamxTirs Carmel: Clay Township: Annexation: Y or N Other Approvals Required: 6A Rc, cF pvELIC, woaKs Design Intotnlatiotl Type of Building: TYPE V -ogre Noux , MASwvRY w/ SIM- FRAME Number of buildings: 1 Number of Stories: 1 ►/t Building Height: 24, Fr Square Footage: 211 Exterior Materials: E.fXS Aap ccovc. "K Pox- rLev-4TtoSjS Colors: Tb OF Prreemirieo Type of Uses- __ cPFic6 / w,*t0y0vsE Number of tenants: 7 MAX. Water: ury Sewer: ciT1 Parking: Spaces required: #Y Spaces Provided: 55' 0 Liehting lnformntion Type of Fixtures: fbL& 1*1/1r( A14-0 &ALP14 4 MotMrr , JEE S Ackel> sleight of Fixtures: ZS fr 0 /Z jl. Number of fixtures: 6, 11 Additional Lighting: ?wo ibilro udNn M ,slow, cn on AYo VVMw4Z 1jVCVVr1Yun1r I If 04Y f- Signal! Number of signs: 8 M0. "Type of signs: 7 Bultood(t, t awfirtGTloN Location: FM SIZE PNw Dimensions: pEX JIM PuW Area: ss J.F. M*X r1k T&44vr SIONIC , zo -7-r. MIX W jVewrWtC4Vo,4 Landscape Plan: Lnndscnning IL A7PMW (.M PSCO A4W I, the undersigned, to the best of my kno*ledge dnd belief, submit the above information Vttued correct. f,toJrZT /1,ecH/7tcr of Applicant Title ffAV g44-AFS 3wr / I, /,V c Printed Name Date State of Indiana ) ) SS: County Of Hamilton ) Before me, a Notary Public in an for said County and State, personally appeared -&AD 041ZA1ES and acktiowledged the execution of the foregoing document. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _ / $ fh day of _6 P7, /^1 9-9, /996. My commission expires: County of Residence: 14Arn , c Public: 3 Docket No. 69-96 DP/ADLS, Currise and Carlson, was referred to Special Study Committee Tuesday, December 3, 1996 at 7:00 PM in the Caucus Rooms of City Hall. 2h Commission to consider Docket No. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, a Development Plan, Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting, and Signage, and Secondary Plat applications for Keltner and Associates. The petitioner wishes to construct a 21,000 square feet office and warehouse building and to plat one lot on 2.14 acres. The site is located on the north side of Carmel Drive, across from the entrance to Chase Court. The site is zoned M-3/Manufacturing. Filed by Ken Keltner of Keltner and Associates. Brad Barnes of Cuppy, Graef & Turner appeared before the Commission representing the petitioner. The petitioner is seeking approval to construct an office building to house a maximum of eight tenants, and warehouse/storage space, located in Carmel Science and Technology Park. The Keltner parcel contains 2.1 acres on the north side of Carmel Drive. The front facade of the building will be constructed of stucco, the columns, corners and facia will be brushed pewter. An entry canopy will project out from the main entrance at the center of the building and will match the door and window frames. Overhead doors for truck loading and unloading will be placed to the rear of the building. The petitioner computed the parking requirement to be 34.8 spaces and has provided 60 spaces. The entrance to the parcel is proposed directly opposite Chase Court. The lighting consists of wall mounted wallpacks and entrance ballards. The landscaping consists of deciduous and coniferous trees, low hedges and stone walls along the front, and bushes with annuals and mulch beds around each of the doors. A building identification sign is proposed at the main entryway; each tenant will have its own identification sign. No variances are being sought. Mr. Barnes reported that an additional 10 feet of right-of-way is being dedicated to provide for a future bike trail. Members of the public were invited to speak in favor or opposition to the proposed project; the following appeared: Gary Murray, 17752 Cedarbrook Drive, Westfield, spoke as a representative of the seller of the property. Mr. Murray was under the impression that Brad Barnes would be seeking approval for two driveway cuts; Mr. Murray requested some sort of commitment from the petitioner that driveway cuts would be requested and some resolution made. Brad Barnes reported that he had met with the Department and with the City Engineer in an effort to gain curb cut approval, but felt that one would suffice. Mr. Barnes thought the curb cut c:\minutes\pc\1996.nov n decision should come from the Plan Commission. The public hearing was then closed. Mark Monroe, for the Department, recommended that additional landscaping be planted within the required green belt on the west side of the building, as well as the north side. The petitioner proposed the use of existing trees on site to comply with the ordinance; additional information is being requested from the petitioner as to method of tree preservation and how it will comply with the green belt requirement of the M-3 Ordinance. Also, the curb cut and its location is an issue; the ordinance encourages access off Clark Street rather than Carmel Drive. Due to public safety concerns, the City would recommend that curb cuts may not be eliminated on Carmel Drive but minimized because of the number of curb cuts that exist west of Range Line Road along Carmel Drive. The Department is recommending that the project be reviewed at Special Study Committee. Point of clarification: The ultimate approval for curb cut locations is given through the Board of Public Works. Alan Klineman was concerned that the site is overdeveloped and there is little room for truck traffic which a warehouse would require --there is no turn around room. Tom Thompson expressed concern regarding the approach to the property from the east on Carmel Drive from a full visibility standpoint. Access from Clark Street is also a primary concern. Docket Nos. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, a Development Plan, Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting, and Signage, and Secondary Plat applications for Keltner and Associates was referred to the Special Study Committee which will meet December 3, 1996 at 7:00 PM in the Caucus Rooms of City Hall. Old Business: mission to consider the Commission Rules of Procedure as ap ed by the Execu " e Committee on October 15, 1996. Mark Monroe reported t the revised Rules of Proced were distributed to the Plan Commissioners on October or review. Alan Klineman recommended certain es in the revised rules which will be made by Counsel. Upon motion made b ick Sharp and duly seconded, th vised Rules of Procedure were unanimously aWroved. c:\ ninutes\pc\1996.nov 0� R right-of-way and is an issue to be resolved. The petitioner reported that he will be appearing before e BZA for variances from the U.S.421 Overlay Zone requirements: 1) Green It along U.S. 421, Planting adjacent to buildings; 3) Peripheral planting; and 4) Curbin quirement. The Departm has talked with the petitioner regarding the relocation of the p ing area, perhaps to the rear, which ould eliminate the need for one or two of the variances- a petitioner owns property adjacent wh would allow for overflow parking --there is an ternative. Mike Hollibaugh requested tha he petitioner provide approval letters fr the County Surveyor, as to whether or not the drainage posal meets the County's requir ents; and INDOT, stating their proposal to re -grade inside the n t-of-way and restructure ainage to make it work again, and for landscaping within the 421 right-o - ay. Mr. Zoccola commented that the property th est is owned by a separate entity in which Mr. Carlson does have an ownership interest; h er it is a separate entity. If the buildings were reconfigured, the entire tenant layout w d have be reconstrued because access is presently from the front and the HVAC is bui along the rear. he petitioner reported that it was his understanding that drainage had of been an issue with Technical Advisory Committee and it was not a concern. Brad Barnes stated tyafhe had designed the on -site drainage and th after completion of the retention ponds, W County's requirements for drainage will have been et. The petitioner submitted lett s from the County Highway and Soil Conservation ServiceNc the file. Upon p6tion made by James Bolander and duly seconded, Docket No. 69-96 DP/ASS, for C 'se and Carlson was approved PENDING review and approval of the landscape plan. Item 2. Committee to consider Docket No. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, a Development Plan, Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting, and Signage, and Secondary Plat applications for Keltner and Associates. The petitioner wishes to construct a 21,000 square feet office and warehouse building and to plat 1 lot on 2.14 acres. The site is located on the north side of Carmel Drive, across from the entrance to Chase Court. The site is zoned M-3/Manufacturing. Filed by Ken Keltner of Keltner and Associates. Ken Keltner of Keltner and Associates and Brad Barnes of Barnes Investments appeared before the Committee requesting Secondary Plat approval for a 21,000 square foot office and warehouse building on the north side of Carmel Drive opposite Chase Court, between Range Line Road and U.S. 31. Permission is also being sought to plat 1 lot on 2.14 acres. In order to preserve the existing tree line, truck access around will be a two lane drive along the side of the parcel with dimensions of 28 foot wide with a 35 foot turning radius. The building will house eight tenants; the parking spaces number 61, 50 spaces are required. The building is designed as flex tenant/office complex. pc\ss I996.dec 3 The petitioner reported that one entrance off Carmel Drive is desired directly opposite Chase Court. There is an existing 75 foot right-of-way and the Department is requesting an additional ten feet to accommodate a future bicycle path along Carmel Drive; the petitioner is willing to dedicate the additional 10 feet of right-of-way. Currently, the developer has mounded the ground at the front of the site which poses a potential problem with traffic/sight distance. The petitioner is proposing to cut back the trees in the right-of-way line, reduce the berm height, and plant low lying shrubs in order to keep visibility at a maximum. Per the landscape plans, low boxwood shrubs will be utilized across the front with mulch beds containing annual flowers; a 24 inch white and grey stone wall will be constructed to match the white/grey stucco exterior of the building. Deciduous and coniferous trees will be planted for screening. Across the front, there will be plantings in a stone bed with shrubbery and annual flowers. Signage: A Building Identification sign will be out near the right-of-way, size, colors and lettering to be in accordance with the Carmel Sign Ordinance; wooden shadow box fence to be installed. Lighting: Parking lot fixtures are shoebox, down lighting, and wall packs across the back the backside as well as security lighting. Mike Hollibaugh of the Department reported that the petitioner had addressed the Department's concept, however no details were yet available and the Department will continue to work with the Petitioner. According to the Department, the side and rear landscape yards are in question as to the required landscaping. The five foot requirement would apply if the project were Industrial use; storage/warehouse with office space has different requirements. The petitioner reported that he has provided for 25 feet on center landscaping. In regard to site distance and access, Kate Boyle, City Engineer, reported that access was recommended to be gained farther to the east than planned by the petitioner, and in fact as far to the east as possible. The City Engineer's position of supporting the main entrance to the proposed site as aligned with Chase Court was conditioned upon a horizontal as well as vertical clearance for line of site; additionally, she was not shown nor made aware of a 24 inch wall along the front of the property. Terry Jones reported that according to the ordinance, access to this particular parcel should be made by an internal street, the closest of which would be Clark Street. Access to this site has been an issue for the Department as well as Engineering from the very beginning of the project. Gary Murray of Paul I. Cripe, Inc. reported that there are four parcels in the immediate area which directly affect the subject site; it is possible that two of the parcels could be reconfigured. Terry Jones gave the history of the site that when the development was approved, and under the primary development plan, it was divided into larger blocks, and as it was developed, private drives would access individual parcels and filter to the internal streets as opposed to drives onto the main access. The ordinance contemplated a main access road within the development and main access from Guilford Road --there is no mention of access from Carmel Drive; and wherever possible, pc\.ssl996.dec 0 alignment of curb cuts shall be encouraged, access roads are also to be 500 feet apart. City Engineer Kate Boyle remained firm in her position that appropriate access be decided before a location along Carmel Drive is determined. If the petitioner obtains a curb cut on Carmel Drive, she would prefer that it be located as far to the east as possible, but with the aforementioned conditions of guaranted clear lines of sight and willingness to participate in future potential traffic improvements at this locations, she could support requested entrance. Upon motion made by Norma Meighen and duly seconded, Docket Nos. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, Keltner and Associates was recommended for approval. 3. Committee to consider Docket No. 80-96 ADLS, an Architectural Design, Lighting, Landscaping, and Signage application for the Linder Company The petitioner seeks approval to renovate, make additions, and to make sev site improvements for the new Merchant's Square Shopping Center. Th site is Toted at the existing Keystone Square Mall location. The site i oned B-8/ iness. Filed by ' Nelson of Nelson and Frankenberger. Jim Nelson appeared before th ommittee to answer questions raise at public hearing. Also present were Ernie Reno, Craig He ee, and other members of the evelopment team. The proposed Center Identification Sig/hbe is to be plac at the northwest corner of the intersection of 116th and Keystone Avs approved y the Board of Zoning Appeals was approved November 25, 1996, subject to ition . 1) The logo will not be illuminated; 2) One-third of the message center operate a allocated for community related activities; 3) For a period of two yearsof a ocation of time for community activities is to be provided to the Dept. of Commun' es; and The reader board will contain no pricing information. The sign will be in size and aracter, black lettering on white background. In addition, a request wilde of the State remove the fence within the right-of-way which has heretofore beenr signage. The location of th/ealigned, ildings as reviewed as well as internal site ' culation. The proposed plan attempts to ecut- rough" traffic by more clearly defining internal roadway system. AAA Wd to become the primary entrance into and out Merchants Square from 116th Street om Carmel Drive. An automated traffic signal wil a installed at the intersection to be AAA Way and 116th Street. AAA Way will be wide d by approximately 5 fned, and curbed. All streets intersecting with AAA Way ovidefor three lanes in all fions. The points o ngress and egress to the center from 116th Street have been redesigned: the curt access bSP&een National City Bank and the Tucker building will be eliminated; the current acces west o ardee's will be extended only to the "Ring" Road. The Ring Road will provide for traffic 1996.dec 3 2i. Commission to consider Docket No. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, a Development Plan, Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting, and Signage, and Secondary Plat applications for Keltner and Associates. The petitioner wishes to construct a 21,000 square feet office and warehouse building and to plat 1 lot on 2.14 acres. The site is located on the north side of Carmel Drive, across from the entrance to Chase Court. The site is zoned M-3/Manufacturing. Filed by Ken Keltner and Associates. Brad Barnes, architect, reviewed the project which was originally presented to the Commission in November. The petitioner has provided 65 spaces as opposed to the required 50. The spite is designed for office/flex space. The parcel is a slight visibility problem with this particular parcel and the petitioner proposed to eliminate the landscape berm on Carmel Drive; five trees will be eliminated from the existing tree line on the east boundary and the right-of-way will be regraded to be in keeping with the curb elevation. The elevations of the building have not changed. There is space for eight tenants; there will be building identification signs and each tenant will have signage. At this point, the building is referred to as the Keltner Building, but the name is subject to change. The trash enclosures to the rear will be enclosed in a shadow box fence, and painted to match the exterior of the building. The lighting is metal haloed fixtures in a box housing so that the bulb is not visible; there are also wall pack security lighting at the sides and rear of the building. The primary concern on this site has been access. If access is granted by positioning an entrance to the site directly opposite Chase Court, the petitioner has agreed to maintain low landscaping, reduce the mounding, and reduce the trees which project into the right-of-way. One curb -cut has been provided to minimize traffic from Carmel Drive. There is another lot between the subject site and Chase Court which would also need a curb cut onto Carmel Drive. The landscape plan and signage have not changed since the original presentation to the Commission. Rick Sharp reported for the Special Study Committee. There is a problem with access to the parcel; the Ordinance states that any access directly to Carmel Drive is to be discouraged. If the parcel were divided differently, or if an access road could be provided from the rear, it would alleviate the problem. The Committee did vote for approval because it felt that the use of Technology Park is in a flux at present and will begin to change according to the demands of the market. The Commission asked that the Department counsel with the property owners in Carmel Science & Technology Park so that access will be determined before the lots are actually sold. The Department recommended that the project be tabled until the Board of Public Works c:\minutes\pc\1996.dec decision regarding the curb cut is known. Also, the Department did not feel that it was the Plan Commission's or Board of Public Works' obligation to solve the problems and concerns of the property owner in how the land is laid out; it is not the obligation of the Plan Commission or the Board of Public Works to give access unless it is off a frontage road or side street such as Clark Street. Including this project, there are approximately 10 acres left to be developed and platted in Carmel Science & Technology Park. Upon formal motion made by Rick Sharp and duly seconded, Docket Nos. 73-96 DP/ADLS and 74-96 SP, for Keltner and Associates were approved subject to approval by the Board of Public Works regarding access. The vote was ten in favor, Jay Dorman and Alan Klineman opposed. Commission to consider Docket No. 80-96 ADLS, an Architectural Design, Lig 'ng, Landscaping, and Signage application for the Linder Company. Th etitioner seeks a roval to renovate, make additions, and to make several site impro ments for the new rchant's Square Shopping Center. The site is located at the fisting Keystone Square Mall cation. The site is zoned B-8/Business. Filed by Jim Ne on of Nelson and Frankenberger. Jim Nelson, 3663 Brumley W following public hearing in N Center was forwarded to the meeting. , Carmel, appeared before the ( tg,nber, the redevelopment plan ,cia't,Studv Committee which Y, Rick Sharp, chairman of the Special Study CbTnmit the committee centered upon traffic and the imp was determined that a four-way stop at Keysto control . Also, the intersection at AAA W and N intersection. Rick Sharp also talked abo the pror "T" intersection and not permit traffic cross from building. in ',fision and reported that Merchant's Square Shopping for approval at its December , reported that the majority of discussion of t various improvements would make. It and Ring Road would be a good form of 'cal Drive would be improved to a safer illo,,curb Medical Drive so as to create a f,-dica'1,Drive directly in front of the Marsh Bill Fehribach of A&F Engine 'ng, Indianapolis, explained the pro sal which is to curb both the north and south sides of edical Drive coming into AAA Way. Ao, adequate turning lanes will be provided on 1 approaches and a four way stop at the inters lion. The volumes will be minimal on all proaches, and no problem was anticipated. Craig Hessee, pro' ct manager for The Linder Company, reported that there was cussion regarding curb' g off and creating a "T" intersection at Medical Drive. The interse 'on cannot be "squared f;" however, AAA Way will be curbed and will better channel the flow traffic; the existi building actually sets on the pavement, the new building will be set back 12 feet from t1X roadway. Craig Hessee reported that AAA Way is being widened to three lanes. c:\minutes\nc\l 996.dec ()"W.m Toyner A1110IITF.(777S r!twerriber 6, 1996 111.1,1 i ,o m i-'slori membms 1 armel relay Kin Commission line Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 RC: Kepner Suiiding Carmel Science and Technology Park West C'srmcl Drive I sett 1'la,n rl'oram'ssi-)n Members: 1021 South Rangeline Road Carmel, Indiana 46032 (317) 846-5729 B. Milton Cuppy, Jr., AIA, CS] Kurt F. Graef, AIA Robert H. Turner, AIA '.Yr- ire s+.Iilvarhig b:•fbi-e (lie plc(^_=i comm isclon for d hearing re '.'arding t11.; A VA _,S, tiCc'ln<f;lr} plat -md devolo mow plan applications for z proposed warehousing are! ,415cc thcility for the Carpel S. io nce and 'I'cchnolopv Park. The Keltner Building will consist of' 21 114 sruare feet of )+ullding, divided into a maKirautn of eight tenant spaces, on 8 '. l.i acrr: site }nratcd Ji►st west of '1'(4ung's Hsj iAt Paving 'i tie building construction wi}1 be steel flame with an EIFS front facade per the elevations. Me ci!xco ccluinns aid cornice will be a brushed pewter color and the base will be a pearl white o-nlor The main antry canopy will be constructed from anodized a}umbium as will the %V11,1dowq. gi -mg the building a seek. modern appearance. For added detai}, a 12" wide press!d zim.detail border will be installed just under the cornice "fhe pattern detail is enclosed in tl.is Ix,cket The color of the border will match the anodized aluminum of the entry and winds:%vs. J he stucco Columns and cornice will he contintied on the sides of the building as well The -1des and rear of the building will he masonry painted to match the pearl white stucco. t ;t£ a,.e of the building will be a combination of offices with adjacent warehntise spsce Fach trriant space oil fists of 2.509 square feet which will typically he divided into 800 srruate feet of Afire area ;wdl ' 700 square feet of wirenouse area Based on this ratio, th; office area of the building k prc�iecte d at Ir;,000 square feet. This requires 50 space', and we hmc provided 60 �.i•^cEs with an addifiuitai 17 possible in 01c rear parking aiea. without adding a7y additional asplAt. Truck to xiing and unloadinC will he in the rear of the site with overhead load inef dears ii 1� idt'rl f;;reach tetstl�it s;lace The trucks can ivaneuver through the site using the drives on -ither side (if the building. CONSULTING PLANNING ARCHITECTURE CAD The location of the entry drive has been discussed at length with the Department of Community Services, the City Engineer and the developer of the project. Due to the nature of the inside radius of the curve, a center location is preferable to give the greatest amount of visibility for traffic traveling in both directions on Carmel Drive. Secondly, we have been asked to maintain a five hundred feet spacing between driveways. This location will allow the best visibility while still maintaining a five hundred foot spacing between our drive and a drive for the lot adjacent to the west. The landscape plan incorporates the existing tree line that makes up the east property line of the parcel. We will have to remove several trees that are in or near the Carmel Drive right of way to ensure good visibility. However, the rest of the trees will remain undisturbed. We will plant a new row of trees along the north and west property lines that consist of both coniferous and hardwoods. The front yard will be landscaped with stone planters, maple trees, several hedge rows of boxwoods, and annual and perennial flower beds. The foundation area of the front yard will be planted with shrubs and annual flowers. The site lighting consists of sharp cut-off metal halide parking lot lighting and wall pack security lighting. The entry sidewalks are lit by light bollards. The plan shows the one half foot candle line of each fixture. Each tenant will have a building mounted sign, internally illuminated of matching color The size of all signs will comply with the sign ordinance. The Kellner Building will be a tasteful addition to the Carmel Science and Technology Park. We have donated an additional ten feet of right of ,%vay along Carmel Drive for a future bike path. We have complied with all requests and regulations and are not asking for any variances from either the Zoning Ordinance or Standards of Improvements. I look forward to working with you all again and adding another positive project to the Carmel business district Sincerely, V/ Brad es Cuppy Graef & Turner Architects 12' PRE-55ED ZING TRIM R.� E .F.5 GOLt 4 5 AND �+ CORNICE, BRU5HED FEWER -44 EAVE HEIGHT :+24 -0' -� E.I.F.5 BASE PEARL 6RAY ALUM. 5-ORE FRONT DOORS AND W NOOW5, CLEAR F!NI5H VU LI6Ht GREY TINT 51�AZIN6 ENTRY CANOPY AND CA' LjMN5 Wl BRU5HED ANODIZED 4LUMlNUM FIN15H FRONT ELEVATION SITE LIGHTING 5GALE: 1/16" _ '-O'' (/2 FOOTCANDLE LINE 5HOWN) POLE `COUNT-tD=iXTURF5 l AROUND PERIMETER OF PARKING AREAS GJALITY'L16HTIK6 FIXTURE 400 WATT "ETAS. HALIDE LAMP );E516N 5J, 25 FT. POLE ='A\,'E HE16HT BU LOIN6 MOUNTED FIXTURF5 11 ON 5IDE-5 AND REAR OF BUILD N6 GUAL TY L16HT N6 FtXTURE 115 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP DE516N NW -IV 12 FT. HEIGHT FRONT WALKWAY _ 6HIN6 l BOLLAR05 AT TENANT SPAT E5 QUA- T`" L16HT NC- FIXTURE DE516N GTY 100 WATT METAL HAL DE L-AMP; 3 FT 1-164-i =RONT ENTRY �ANOP'' (b IOOW MH REGE55ED CAN FIXTURES PARKKG REQUIRED PARKI46 OFFtGE [RETAIL: ONE PER 200 5.F AAREHOU5E. ONE PER EMPLOYEE USE: /3 OFFICE 2f3 WAREHOU5E TOTAI QFFtCE AREA: 2N*0 5.=. 4R AND SIDE -- REQUIRED PARK N6: 50 SPA( E5 ^^ (ig T)OADL-S. 1 30' MAX. LETTERS 'eGN 'T =1= L= Ni AfA N I. 14 -0" 4 BUSINESS SIGNS INDIVIDUAL LETTER5, INTERNALLY LI(5HTED AL�OWA$LE AREA PER ORDINANiCE. 35 5 F. KELTNER M 570 WEST CARMEL IDENTIFICATION SIGN 10" LETTERS 6' LETTER5 WHITE / GRAY STONE BASE "OL SHED ALUMINUM LETTERS, 6ROUND L15HT N6 ALLOWABLE AREA PER ORDNANCE: 20 5F SCALE:IL - 0 N 8q° 28 40 E 21q.gO' 0 POLE L16HT - P �20' DE 2--., TA 26 PLA 0 I -SE � I Sol! SoI� ■� �■ �;� � &' PREFIN&ED METAL 3JT =R AND DOWNSPOU"5 DUNE BRIDE RED 5URGAR YNHITE _ ND`N nAK MAPLE PINE 8 ',AA50NR'( KALL HONEYLOC)5T MORA. NE ')AK SAVE riEI6HT --O'-O 5' REAR AND 51DE YARD SETBACK ENTRY CANOPY AND cOLJMN5 WI BRUSHED ANOD ZED ALUMINIUM FIN15H E,I.F.5 COLUMNS AND CORNICE, BRUSHED PE I +24'-O" E.E. 5 BA5E PEARL 6R� > ALUM 5'OI: AND H NDO W/ LIGHT a FRONT ELEVATION (I/2 FOOTCANDLE LINE 5HOWN) POLE "CUNTED F IXTURE5 I. AROUND PERIMETER OF PARKIN6 AREAS 9JALITY L16HTNN6 FIXTURE 4nO. WATT FETAL HALIDE LA'-IP 5!6N 5J, 25 FT. c)OL.E BUILDING MOUNTED FIXTURE5 N ON -5IDE5 AND REAR Of BUILD N6 G. UAL i TY L16HT,N6 FIXTURE I'75 HA-T METAL HALIDE LAMP DF516N NW -I\ 12 FT. HEIGHT FRONT WALKWAY - 5HT'N6 7 BOLLARD5 AT TENANT 5PACE5 MA -IT" L16HT N6 FIXTURE DE5164 6TY 100 WATT METAL HALIDE LAMP, 3 FT. H16H FRONT ENTRY CAMP"' W IOOW MH RECE55ED CAN FIXTURES REQUIRED PARKi4a OFF CE RETAIL ONE PER 200 15 F /gAREHOU!5E: ONE PER EMPLOYEE 1J5E: /3 OFFICE 2/3 WAREHOU5E TOTAL OFFICE AREA. 26, *O 5 r-. REQUIRED PARK N& 50 5PACE5 PROVIDED PARKING• W SPACE5 5TRWED {ADDITIONAL =ARK N6 N REAR A5 REQUIRED U5E: V J3 OFFICE 2/3 WAREHOUSE TOTAL QPFIGE AREA: 2b,W 5.=. 2 AND 51GE REGUfRED PARKtN6: 50 5PAGE5 �ETND 51 PROVIDED PARKiN6: 60 5PACE5 5TRIPED {ADDITIONAL 'ARKIN6 IN REAR A5 REQUIRED) 2' WIDE ROLLED GONG. CURB, TYP- -REE LINE / ao.O' INLET 1 2500 5F. \ � � 250( C15TIIv6 ;RB INLET \ \ \ h N M" 25 40 E 21a.40' .� AREA DRAIN \ \ \ GU?B . \ N\T IDENTI \ \ W/ (2) CARMEL 400D HE06E DANCE CENTER. _ TALL, TYP. R=30' ANj' A< '--56f R M.H. G+..IR3 INLET _ &X I M t . O ig �Lu O m (g YOUNG`5 A5PHA.LT { PAVIW7 VAR A13LE WIPTH L.E.