HomeMy WebLinkAboutRemonstrance & 2 Petitions
<'
\ \ -~----
\ ,J.--Y " ~
... '7 '"'-
i~~~ ~
~/ ~ ~
~:-\ - ~ 'X./~ ~ ; Pulte Homes, Revised Rohrer Road Subdivision Proposal
',.-\~.' ~ ~~~ep~ember 4th, 2006, Carmel Planning Commission Subcommittee Hearing
--" !
. .. , ""_.~,_-.-c-c/,/' .
o
o
Surrounding Homeowner Issues and Concerns
Submitted on behalf of Autumn Lake Subdivision
f'l\.-OYl-oY\
\GJ.Me') puD
The residents of the Autumn Lake subdivision wish to express our concern and
disapproval of the latest version of the Pulte Homes development plan for the
Rohrer Road property. We believe many significant issues remain unresolved
and the latest plan is, in fact, a step backward from the progress made between
Pulte Homes and the neighbors of the surrounding subdivisions. We therefore,
request that the subcommittee consider the following issues and reject this latest
development plan until resolution of these issues is obtained.
1. At no time has Pulte asked for our input regarding its latest
development plan. Pulte submitted this plan the Thursday before this
meeting and confirmed via email request they were presenting the Friday
before this meeting. At all three prior planning commission meetings
regarding the proposed development, Pulte has been criticized by this
committee regarding its poor cooperation with neighbors. We have been
ignored in this latest plan revision.
2. The proposed high-density, duplex development violates Carmel's
current master development plan. The current zoning is for single
family, residential housing. What good is this plan if builders are allowed to
violate it at will?
3. Besides builder profits, no compelling reason for this high-density,
duplex development has been provided. At its last presentation, Pulte
promised and failed to deliver the details of its analysis where it alleged
financial benefits to the city of Carmel. Pulte's past actions have given us
no reason to trust the integrity of its analysis.
4. Current home sales make the viability of this project questionable.
Our research indicates that new home building permit applications have
fallen 20-25% in Carmel. Many town homes remain unsold and new
construction delayed on others. Our concern is should this subdivision be
built, many of these homes will become rental properties. This introduces
a whole range of potential transient, rental related problems less likely to
occur in single family home subdivisions.
5. The proposed high density, duplexes have been moved to 30 feet (10
yards) from the proposed property line. From the first full planning
commission meeting Pulte has been told that their buildings should be a
minimum of 50 feet from the property line. We believe that closer
development of the proposed high-density, two-story duplexes greatly
1
o
o
impacts adjacent Autumn Lake homeowners' privacy. In addition, the
duplexes are only ten feet apart leaving little "blue sky" between homes.
This is definitely a step backward in their proposal.
6. The many important details of the proposed high-density duplex
designs are missing. This includes the exterior design, interior design,
materials composition, foundation, and other critical construction
specifications. Without full disclosure it is impossible to assess the final
value of the homes to determine whether or not they come close to, much
less equal, surrounding property values.
7. No fencing or landscaping plans have been provided specifying how
the latest proposal will separate the proposed subdivision from
surrounding subdivisions or will transition the proposed subdivision
to others. The prior plan did provide this information. The current design
does not provide consideration of this separation or transition. Again, this
is a step backward.
8. Pulte continues to ignore important recommendations made by the
commission. For example, it has not developed a tree preservation plan.
A second example is that it has continued to specify high-density road
layouts while it was recommended that Pulte explore alternative designs
that would not result in an uninteresting, cookie-cutter neighborhood. A
third example is that they present a single-family proposal which they have
not provided evidence they have done.
9. The entrance/exit to the proposed duplex development does not
meet the 500 foot minimum distance from the next public
intersection as specified by Carmel city code. This requirement was
met in Pulte's prior plan but has been removed from the current plan. We
believe this represents a significant traffic safety issue.
10. The Carmel Fire Department, Department of Community Services,
and Street Department have all previously stated they favor public
streets within the proposed development. They continue to ignore the
recommendations of these city departments. Many design details are
missing for the proposed private roads including curbing and composition.
11. The proposed connecting stub road from the development to the
Autumn lake subdivision continues to pose public safety risks to
both current and future developments. Both the proposed Rohrer Road
development and Autumn Lake subdivisions currently have only one
access road in and out of them. Should one become blocked the proposed
stub road imposes significant, unnecessary time delays in emergency
service response between subdivisions.
2
, .
o
o
12. No guest parking is indicated on the latest plan. With high-density,
duplexes specified with substandard streets this will result in parking
problems. Our concern is overflow parking causing congestion in the
surrounding subdivisions, especially when residents hold parties or family
events.
13. No Rohrer Road roadbed improvements or traffic control
improvements have been specified in the proposed plan. Besides the
two other new subdivisions proposed for Rohrer Road, Pulte's proposal
would add 38 high-density, duplexes with multiple cars. This will
significantly add to commuting traffic. We believe that Pulte should pre-
commit to a large, equitable share of the cost related to these
improvements before any construction is allowed to begin.
14. No public street lighting has been indicated on the latest plan. Will
there be lighting? If so, what type and locations of lights will be used.
15. The impact of digging basements has not been assessed. Will the
extra dirt for 38 duplexes be spread out on the site, further raising its
elevation? Or, will it be removed from the site and the elevation reduced?
Our concern is increased water drainage from increased site elevation.
16. The current documentation does not address the existing water
drainage problem into other subdivisions. The prior plan addressed
these issues to a large extent. However, no documentation has been
provided relative to how the current plan will alleviate drainage problems.
17. The current plan does not address city utilities connection issues.
Dedicated water and sewer connections were made to connect the
Autumn Lake subdivision when it was built. Capacity does not exist to
extend this to the new development. Where is Pulte expected to make
these utility connections?
18. There is no public park and Monon Trail access specified on the
latest plan. In the prior Pulte plan a public park with Monon Trail access
was specified. Pulte made this commitment to surrounding neighbors in its
prior plans and discussions. However, it has been deleted from this plan.
19. Pulte's current plan will negatively impact surrounding property
values. While Pulte's late submission of its current plan prevented us from
performing a detailed survey of realtors, we did speak with a realtor whose
initial impression was that the proposed high-density, duplex plan will
negatively impact surrounding property values. Those homes closest to
the new development will be impacted the most. Why should we be
negative impacted without due compensation?
3
"'
'-.)
o
~w~\
Y'f\ ~""DY) ~~ D .
On Thursday, August 31 S\ 2006, Pulte met with Matt Griffin of the
DOCS to submit the revised site plan and the front elevation. I met
with Matt the next day and this, (show paperwork), is what was ,~:,,:/~,----,_
.y .
gIven to me. , (: " ~\
", ~~ ~
-, . ~ ~ 'I-
I couldn't believe it. After almost a year, these "revised" plans a\re ~ ~~ ~ )~
a joke. This is it? I don't think they are very serious about '\, ~ ~ /-
building on those parcels of land. ''''>_ _._---;<<,' .
On the same day that I received this paperwork, I met with Gary
Duncan, Assistant City Engineer. This would be Friday,
September 1 S\ 2006. Please note that this is just the day before the
Labor Day Weekend. I showed Gary the latest revised site plan.
Gary has given me permission to go on record with the following
comments and I quote:
"I thought this was dropped as I did not hear from anyone since I
sent Pulte an email in October, 2005. Pulte NEVER has replied to
the engineering department regarding the comments for this
development in that email. Why are they still allowed to go on
after ignoring us for almost a year?" End quote.
I agreed with him and told him that there needed to be some type
of policy in place before developers could get back on schedule
with the subdivision committee. The present method of
continuously returning to the committee with little or none of the
suggestions made by the committee acted upon or approvals by the
various departments of the city is doing nothing but wasting the
committee's time and everyone one else's time.
During the second week of June, I met with Steve Schutz and Will
Wright who are local builders in Carmel. They expressed interest
in buying this property and building 2 story town homes with
basements. This is what you see here tonight. I gave them an
engineering site plan and went over some of the comments that this
~
o
w
committee had made and told the two builders what the
homeowners were also looking for. I emphasized how important it
was for them to meet with the homeowners before any plans were
brought to the subdivision committee, unlike Pulte. Steve and Will
agreed.
It has been approximately three months since that meeting and the
Autumn Lake homeowners have NEVER heard from Steve Schutz,
Will Wright or Pulte.
No one is listening to the homeowners or this committee. There
seems to be little to no respect for any of us.
Tonight we ask the committee to throw out this project and keep
the parcels residential.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Jim Blanchard
13707 Autumn Lake Overlook Dr. Carmel, In.
rune tlume:; - l\,mgslun
T?9I~:)
MyPultc" tfHR~ CAli:
o Save homes and
communities to
'\heir MyPulte P orttolio
"Compare their sawd
homes sidE:-by-side
S.....e theirla5t 5e"rch
across: session:::
" Auto login to '\he site 10r
eas}<access to the
above 1eatu"H
F..EGattR 1\'0\11
t,.lRJ!' c.".I;M.\'I.',ul! 1?~,1i gR?
..... lC'Gf!lc' Hlf-:i
IIYFU1.H u~tF< I,::>:
t.
pAs! \rloftD:
I '
.......,;
''m_....__._____ __
> fORGOl ~
_~~.!!~A5~~~~~_ ;1 LOGn\
P fltW
Your direct route to the
Pulle Ht>mes map.
Or to aspeoifrcarea:
I=.~~~~:=~.!EJ
rage J OJ J
~
r~
p..
.Mair)_Pag-,~ } [\n.CLYQ!JL!:1Q1n'l }6rnw.li{l.1.~!!=!! } Nl<!1)Y! ) R~j!LS!!9aJ1o"LRi<:l9-~ >j\ingst91l } Images
...q
\
Ul
I
D
S
r:._-._...._.._~----_..~._~-~-=.~::.--:. ----:--------.-..-:------~-------~---~..-..-,.---------.--~--------__'"'^ _._.__..~-
, - .. .-. ..
Kingston
~
,
I
,
l.;:-:..:....~.;......;.:~..;..;..;..;....,;:.:,:..~~;;;;..;......;;...:;.-~~:....,;....:._,.._...;;;..,..:..~C;.....~~_~,;;~_..:-
We reserve the right to make changes to the home and/or to mai<:e deviations from the plans Of specifir.alioJls
necessary in our sole opinion by site, job, governmental conditions or availabmty of materials. Square'oolage
estimated only and may vary in actual construction.
'Prices stated may not include lot premiums. upgrades and options. For further details, contact your Pulle Har
associate. Prices subject to change without notice. All Puhe Homes house plans are protected by U.S. Copyri!
For further information see our terms of use.
http://www.pulte.com/homefinder/enlarge_Image.asp?1 = I &CommOrg_ AcctCode= 1976&... 2/2 J /2006
Roland and Cleo Barthuly
From: Kathy Bartel [kbartel@indy.rr.com]
Sent: March 02, 2006 8:38 AM
To: Brian D. Mayo; Fred Glaser; Joseph C. Griffiths; Kevin Kirby; Mark Rattermann; Rick Sharp; Ron Carter
Cc: Linda Hunter-Lattak; George Bauer; Roland Barthuly; Kathy Bartel; Cindy Sheeks
Subject: Proposed Pulte Development on Rohrer Road
Attachments: Letter to City Council.pdt
To: Kevin Kirby - District 2 Councilman
Mark Rattermann - City Council At Large
cc: Rick Sharp
Brian D. Mayo
Joseph C. Griffiths
Fred Glaser
Ron Carter
Re: Proposed Pulte rezoning of 6.81 acres of land just north of and adjacent to Autumn Lakes subdivision and
bordered to the north by the Panhandle Eastern pipeline company substation.
We, as an adjacent neighborhood located immediately west of Rohrer Road to the above property, wish to express our
concerns regarding the above stated proposal. We have the following concerns:
1) Significant increased traffic on Rohrer Road.
2) Probable traffic diversion into Hunter's Creek South
3) Placement of a 3-story high density residential development near existing single family homes.
4) School bus safety issues
5l Possibl~ school overcr~wding (\-' e ".' ( - S' )." ~..I5 i j r t, E
i&) /\;'0 !S~fFGR-oerull'fA/ Thf 11l.du,Wv t.,~}(eJ- \)'_JBPWdI'U~ Ie r~et J /11.
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. <!.f\~'(> w/ TJ, € ~ S/t,\t{)' r~w...v~(H;.{f'r ,S6()71--, of
. MA.e4iV.A l),~~ _- ';>00 tb-" '0 Tht" SQI;7ij ~~ T4f
Smcerely, ..,/'1 f> 5'i) {} S'''Te
Hunter's Creek South Community Association , .\ <l. . C I.,
Roland Barthuly - President
George Bauer - Vice President
Cindy Sheeks - Treasurer
Kathy Bartel - Secretary
~~~I PA4JJ
9q9
76~iQ [)
/'- f) . ') SI4;,~;4j
PIP~ 14/1> ;~j.(fl:t,
I)
R-( rVJi I\-:;L
--
03/07/2006
.1' , ·
:#1..
~,. ,"
Petition to Block the Rezoning of approximately 6.81 acres of land just
north of and adjacent to Autumn Lakes subdivision
Pulte Homes of Indiana has submitted a proposal to build Monon Townes, a PUD development on said parcel. This will
consist of sixty five three story town homes which will back up approximately 35 feet to the nearest residential homes in
Autumn Lakes.
We, the undersigned, are concerned dtizens who urge our leaders to act now to elect NOT to rezone this parcel from Rl
residential to PUD.
It is NOT in conformity with the comprehensive plan of low density construction.
It is NOT compatible to the adjacent homes.
After speaking with several realtors, the owners have come to realize that property values WILL go down in the entire
subdivision.
There is no way to permanently screen Autumn Lakes in such a manner that will protect the owners privacy.
We WOULD approve this project for residential lots.
~LENN
rUNJ<'ffl)\J ~i:
v11~lUi ~
A-~x tt-1J:tJ c:= ft
Ll Z 2LatN IJMflI01 rll c-
;( fq lofc
':;;)/t ~ 10 tp
2-/t:( -0,"
, 1"10'
J-'" ~-{)\,
~~ 7 LeAf I3r -rrL
.1(- J 9-0G.
Pe.~ tAlA
iCrf-/LyJ [1)'111')
~
t.!67 L~~f (Jr. '-J(L
(369) ;iv/knot.. ~k" Ovv/..L
l~t'7l ~~IJ
- / f-o(,
~
'-'" ~ -J. ~ ~ ~ .::> ~ -..$l
~ \J 0 ~ ~ ~ () ~ ,,~ <J
'\) I \ t ';) . Cf 9 I \
, 0---. , <;)..... ~ Q"" ~ \ .. C) ~ <0
() - \il)
~ "- ~ -.- Clo-' J q') rr
...... I f I eN I \
I ~ N
j ~ \ ~ I'X ~
~ ~ co f\j N
~ ~ f~ ~ J::
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
~ QI <- <:Q
Q./J
<: -
~ .... ~
c
t; <;{:.
~
~ t.,/) ~ R --.s1
~ '>
~ ~ 0 ~ 00
~ r() 0i ~ '-..:. 0')
--
-.-
'i
..
~
~ ~ ('") -
\)..,. --I- .D"-
') ~ g
'S to. g :>l
A ~ :::::J.. v
'f
V " ~ ~ <V
~ -
C$ ~
-! ,'v ~
~ v ,~
~ ... ~ W
~ ~ \D (?
.,
-(,-
rJ ~ -...J ~
,~ 1:) 0 .....
~ ~ ~ ~ Ii.
- ~ )- .~ ~ '';\ ~
N ~ ~ ~
~ ~~ t I ~ ~
d) ~ '
-J t
Cf' ..J \\J .;t
~ ~ ~
:' ~ - -0 .()
. ~ ~
)
,~, ~ { ,\:f" ~
V~~
-..,;'1 0a ~
~ r- \
~ ('.f'
()
--..
~~
- ~
~~
~ .
J
l~
r.f\ C!)
ci
1:6
~ ~
,;
"f;
~
o
~
bo
r0
>)J.t ,~".
~.
=#-~
Petition 'tto> Pu~e:sent Autumn Lakes Homeowner's Demands If Rezoning of
6.81 ,Iicw'e~; adjacent to and north of Autumn Lakes is approved.
If the rezoning of above acreage is approved as a PUD, the homeowners have listed the following demands:
We, the undersigned, are concerned citizens who urge our leaders to act now to have Pulte Homes of Indiana
1. Build two story town homes instead of three story town homes.
2. Any rear facing building to the Autumn Lakes subdivision should have dormers, shutters, and bump outs. (See
exhibits of acceptable two story buildings). '
3. Buildings will be bricked on all sides.
4. There should be many windows on the sides of all the town homes and not just a few.
5. There should be a 4-6 foot mound with a privacy fence and landscaping extending from Rohrer Road to the Monon
Trail between Autumn Lakes and the proposed PUD.
6. Drainage issues are to be addressed on both sides of the proposed mound, (See number 5).
7. Create a minimum buffer of 100 feet between Autumn Lakes subdivision and proposed Monon Townes
development OR
~ 8. The entrance to Monon Town shall be 500 feet from the Intersection of Rohrer Road and Nevelle Lane as required
by the Engineering Department. The Carmel Fire Department, the Department of Community Services and the
Street Department are all in favor of a..public street into the Monon Townes development.
~ 9. The new public street into Monon Townes should Intersect with Autumn Lake Overlook Drive and terminate in a cul-
de-sac east of the extension of Autumn Lake Overlook Dr. This should help to solve the drainage problem to
Autumn Lakes subdivision.
10. Put in a speed bump where Autumn Lake Overlook Dr. intersects the public street in the Monon Townes
development.
11. Brick or stone walls should separate the entrance to the Monon Townes from Autumn Lake Overlook Dr. similar to
the entrance from Rohrer Road with lighting and landscaping.
12. Install indirect lighting instead of globe lights for street lighting.
13. Add more than eleven guest parking spaces.
14. The residents of Autumn Lakes subdivision shall have access to the Monon Trail.
r6
~*
r~f
~ ~ -"\..0 '0 \,)
~ ~ "
~ <:) ., ~ ~ ( \ 10
<,) I ~ ~ ().. \ ~
~ . \S"" ~ ~ - - ~ ,..
"- " I
I , - I -... ( I
\ --.. I , " \ \\)
l\J C) I (\ ~ CO \\l C\j CO AJ
~ " N
,.
"-..J ~
~ ~~
~ -J
~ ~ (~ ~ '>- ~
\::S .~ t: \- .--7 ~
II) i !>
\" J ('.I ~ ~
t"'l l j , .... .....A
~ s:- """'" ~ <lQ
0 :.... ~
0 Cl') ( <;
<S ~ '"
c:t 0
~ ~ 'V G ~
~ ~ .J l~
R CJ I..() - "-J ~~
t"- ~ ~ ~ ..1 ,..... " (" ~
~ r() j ...s "C~
~ ""-c ~ ~ ,~ ~~
:f- ro f(\ C"JI
r() - '"'" .;:s- -
-- - '-'"
c
c
~ 'c
"$~
~ S
~~
-- - ~--- ----- ---- ----- -----------
~
~
-.J>
o .,.s ~
l ..........~ .~
<3"' ;:;:. ~
~~ ~
~ ~
~~
~~
,,~
"(
'~
~\ ~
~~
~ b ~
~ i:? ~ ~ '-.9
J.v .~ ~ c:.
Q,.,. '" '... g 1
~ .~ ~~
\S 'v-.{ u..l ~
~ ..e .....p ~ '~ ~ ~ ~
... <;:::. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
\ -, '-- --:::- '---' -t
~ .~ tJ ,) ~ ~ '" ',-,
f"\ ns N ~ r- ~ ',,-, ('"\
--- ~
\ '";S -- ---.. ,
~ \-:s \:~ '"b t-g r) '--..
~ ~ ~
~~ t:;
~ s.A i r c
'C
\,) - ~ ~
cO dJ \S
~ '-...l ~ ~ ~), ~
J~ ,~ ~ a <) ~
~
.;, - ~ '.J
'" ~ t~'"
)l '- ~ \'" \
..:J.. \) ",/"
st- ..,p .\
\f) .JJ r \
IS" \ll ~
--D \n )-. <::l r:" ~
f'l"\ ~ '" -
"'- " -
:?
~
-2
Cf
\:'->
~\t\
r--
L.L..,
"'-
J
1.:\
::
"
~
~
- ~
~ ~
V
I:l
....:S
v
~
?
/ Q
r~--
'i &
-~
:>
\:9,
<:;.J
\J
c<
"*
0'
~
...
~
~
'"'\L
.J
~
~ \I
~
~
~
\0 ~
r6 "-
~ ~
\\
~~
. ~~
)~~
~<.\\\
~ ~ C"\..
t:. ~~
"-
~
--
u
-
)
~
~
~~
~~
<~
~~
~~
~~
;r
..
~
~y~v.
o 0
CIl -+- cJ
~ ~
t>eYn~V'
Jj.l:!;l'JCHMA~K SUl<V~YING, INC':~ P!. ~~ LA~~SITER 'PLACE
JlMI1L f6ti CQUlllY I\~-- . _
Donn M. Scotten, Registered Land Surveyor '. 95345-7-0 . BE CONDARY PLAT
8603 East 116th Street - Fishers, IndiaM 46038 lnalrumen~. N ~
. (317) 841-1506 r.C.No. 5Iide o.
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTIO N 24, TOWNSHIP 16 NORTH. RANGE 3 EAST
: HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
SHEET 1 OF 2
~
~
llCfllH LNE SE 1/4 SEcna< 24- Tl8lf-RJI:
NORTHWEST CORNER SE 1/4
SECTION 24- TtBN-RJE
RAILROAD SPIKE FCWO PER
COUNTY SURVEYORS' 'liES
N 68'42 08 E
2609.14'
C(MIISSION'S CERTIFICATE
NORTHEAST CORNER SE 1/4 OF SECTION 24- TtBN-RJE
CALCULA TEO CORNER USING SPUT OF FOUND CORNERS.
~
~
Under the authority provided by Act. 01 1981. P.L. 309, Sec.
23, os anended by oels 01 1982, P.L. 211, enocted by the
Ceneral ASSembly of the Slate of Indiana. and all acls
amendatory and supplemenlorv thereto, Gnd an ordinance
adopted by lhe comnon counci I. 01 the City 01 Carmel,
Indlona, thl' plot was 91ven approval by the City 01 Carmel,
as tollows: .
DULY BN'I'BRED FOR. TAXA nON
Su!lIect 10 final aCcet>>a-l.br b lIDSft:r
~clJqof-::?-717 1~!I..Q
"A~~~~
P8m1#
SCALE: 1.=50'
r
&
Adopled f the Cormel/~Ioy c,<Jll1I's.olon at 0 meeting held on
lhe /, doy 01 "fr. f 1995.
Carmel/Cloy Plan C i olon
/
/
SHELL OIL COMPANY /.,
DEED BOOK 222, PAGE 83 / / -:/'
,// -:/' /~
", 'l ,/
_____.l{jI!!:~QL!. __.... ....~/ //'210.26
I - .::::; ./ CONe. Y(ifUM[NT
::'-::'-::'-:;'=--::'-::'-::'-::'~-=--='I-;:;" _...../ . ;.~~~.i ~
--1liI'lirTIiIR'------ --
~
LBOEND
~
CALVIN J. LASSITER
INSTR. #9 002042
OWNERISUBDlVIDBR.
GalVin J. Lassiter
1101 RoHrer Rood
Carmel, Indiono 46032
SURVEYOR
Donn M. Scolten, loS.
Benchmork Surveying, Inc.
8603 East 116th Slreel
Fishers, Indiona 46038
....'-.e.
By:
01 rector
Depl. 01 Comnunlty Development
Carmel, In. 46032
~ p.q
.
fD
It>
b
~
0
:z:
.
EXlSnNG REGULATED DRAIN EASEMENT
153
:8
t\l
'-,
I
....../ I.
.. _-.-/' _--------J
--------- -----
___oC"'_
....---)
/
/
i
\
\
\
~
~
\
\
.\
% +\
~<t .\
~ +\
\ \
~ <0 "\
\ \
'\ .
.'i. \
. 'f,t. +\
\
~
'"
1><1
@
.
fiRE HYDRANT
WATER VALVE
5/8"' REBAR \\HH CJP SET
MAILBOX-
OVERHEAD POWER UNE
CONCRElt MONUMENT SET
AOORESS
DONALO ROBERT I< GLORIA J. MUZLET
INSTR. #9000616
ffiQ!)
....
....
......//
---
- -----------------
-Qf'-
~
il;
"
;!;
II
III
e
Em]
:;.
Oil
..,
It>
o
P
o
o
:z:
&
~
III
!
~
LOT
1
4.39 AC.
OND
'Uo
E
270.00
&
~
.....
""'"
o
----
4
435.9 .
7,68'
---
---") ./)
--,/ /
.___/ ~-1 /
------ ~k:-C5T ~ ~
_------ 1 .0 A~C. ~
~
11' _.-..:------ ~
~----- ---
.-/ ......------ ~"" .
~
r-X_X_X_lI
i
.__11_1
- - -- - - '" --.J-;-~~ --,' 0;' ,-_~~
SOUlli\it$T CORNER SE '/4 OF SEC'lION 24-TlBN-RJE
CAlCULATED BY Sl'UT OF SOUJHWEST CORNER SW 1/4
AND SOUTHEAST CORNER SE 1/4 \lIflCH lItRE FOUND
BY COOI/TY SURVEYOR'S 'liES.
JAMES E. I< MARGARU L MARLOWE
DEEO BOOK 137,PAGE 204
JAMES a IIARGARET LOUISE IlARLO
DEED BOOK 276, PAGE 299
BENCHt.lARK JOB '9520077
~~~ 2/15/95
"C"
~~
.<Q '+
o 0
'(J) -I- d
~ ~
peYl~~'
931flW -5. AM 1/l33
,..~~~
BENCHMARK SURVEYH ~G, Il~'ri'"ilf!>>aouNTYllrc~Rtd LAS L E
Donn M. Scotten, Registered land'S Jrveyor SITER P AC
.8603 East 116th Street - Fishers, Indiana 46038 IlnslnllllcnlNo. ~S3VS10
(317) 841-1506 .fI.C. No. --L-SlideNo. 5*'1
SECONDARY.PLA T
A PART OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF
SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP lB. NORTH, RANGE 3 EAST
HAMILTON COUNTY, INDIANA
SHEET 2 OF 2
CERTIFICATE O(DEDICATlON
;-:,,,.. M .....,
In occordonce .H~ TI tie 865, Arli cia. 1.1, Choplar 12, 01 Iha
Indiana Adm'nl.lrollve Code e.lobll.hlng mlnllllum elondord. lor
lhe procllce 01 land .urvey,ng In Indiana, ellecllve Augusl 16,
1991, lhe following oburvollone ond oplnlona ore eubmlUed
regarding lhe vor;ou. uncerlolntle. In the locotlonl 01 Ihe linn
and corner. e.labllshed on tbl. .urvey 01 a re.ull 01:
SURVEYOR'S REPORT
I, thl underalQned. Colvin J. lossller, owner 01 lhe real
eslol. shown ond described her..n and recorded In the Dlllce
of the Recorder 01 HCIIlllton Counlv, Indlono oa lnllrumenl
Number ~S)j "....t. 9 . do her..by c"llly lhat I hove
laid olf, ploUed, ond aubdlvlded and do hereby lay 011.
plol and subdlvtda aoid real e.lot. In occordonce wllh Ihe
wllhln ploL Thla subdivISion sholl b. known os lASSITER
PLACE.
Wltn.sa my Hand and Seal thlS.:l day at Mtq . 1995
I, the undersigned, hereby cerllly Ihot lhlS Is o'lru. ond
correcl pr Jnt of a au(vey performed under my supervISion on
Ihe loll oWing deacrlbed real eslale:
A pod 01 the We.1 Ha II 01 the Southeasl Quader 01 Sect Ion
24. Townsb,p 16 North, Range 3 Eosl In HCIIllllon Counly
Indiana, being more parllculorly d.scrlb.d a. follows:
COIII1lenclng ot the Soulbwest corner 01 so,d Quarler Secllon;
lhence Norlh 00 degre.s 00 m'nul. 55 aecond. Eall .(oa.umod
beorlng) along the We.1 line of .old Quarter Secllon 1900,45
leet to the POINT Of BEGINNING 01 Ihl. de.cClpllon; Ihence
conllnulng North .00 deqrees 00 minutes 55 aeconds Eaal 01009
.o'd We.1 line 256.36 leet 10 a pOint bOlng Soulh OO.degree.
00 minute. 56 aecondl West 476.45 leet from tbe Norlhwest
corner 01 .old Quarter Secllon: tbence Norlh 68 degreea +2
mlnule.06 .econd. Eo.l parallel with the Norlh lIne 01 .ald
Quader Secllan 270.00 leel; thence Norlh 00 degree. 00
,"Inules 56 aeconda Eo.t parallel wilh the We.1 line of .old
Quoder Secllan 212.00 leet; lhence Nodb 66 degree. +2
minute. 08 ..cand. Eo.t parol lei with the Norlh line 0' .old
Quorler Section 210.26 leet 10 the Weaterly right-of-way
line 01 the Chlcogo, Indianapolis and loulevllle Rollway,
lhence Soulh 33 degree. 16 mlnuh. 20 .econd. Eosl along
sold We.terly C1ght-o/....c:y line 552.21 feel: thence Soulb
6B degrees 42 mlnutl. 06 second. Wesl porallel with the
Nodh line 01 .o,d Quarter Secllon 763.66 teet to lhe Po,nl
of Beginning ond contolnlng 5."8 acrcs. more or less..
I lur.lher certify that pOints were sel at the torners of
SGld real estate, and that thIS survoy correctly shows the
locotion of all Improvements on the premises ond any
easements, hl4~hwQya. ond rl<<jhls-of-way 01 record of which
t.he undersigned has been advised, and 011 encrooctvnents if
any,< across lhe utabl ished survey lines. .
. o~ Vor lonces In the reference monllD8nla;
b Ol.creponcle..n record de.cClpllons and pial.;
c InconslstenCle8 In lines 01 occupollon: .
d) RandClll Error In Neo.uremenl (TIt.eorellcol Uncerla'nly):
The purpo.e' 01 lhla .aurvey was 10 relrace Ihe boundary 01 Ihe
reol e.tale as. ..I oul In..Inalrument Nwnber 90002042 In the
Olllc. of the Recorder 01 Humlllon Counly, Indlono, .n order 10
prepare a Nlnar Plol 01 a 100.00 1001 by ~50.00 loot lract In lhe
Soulhwesl corner 01 lo,d real ellate. The secllon cornera
recovered and uoed to conlrol thl. survey Include the Soulhwe.l
cornor 01 Ihe South.esl Quorler 01 SectiOn 2~, Township 16 Norlh,
Ronge J Eo.t, lhe Saulheast corner and tile Norlhwesl corner of
Ihe Saulheos! Quarter of aald Secllon, and Iha Northwesl corner
01 the Norlheall Quorler of laid Secllon. All 01 Ihl above
corner. were locoted and verified wllh lha Counly Surveyor'.
relerences. Although Ihere were n.. tlea, a PK Naif Wol lound at
the Nodhea.1 corner 01 the No,lbeaal Quarter and checked wllhin
0.2 feel 01 olher PK Nolla lound along Ihe North line 01 Iha
Norlheasl Quarler and was u.ed a. Ihe Northeast corner 01 lhe
Norlheasl Quarter Section. A PK Noll was 01.0 .Iocoled 01 Ihe
Southwell corner 01 Iho Southea.1 Quorhr. However, ollClll1jlh to
u.e Ih,. oe Ihe corner could nol be lupporled. wllh the meoaureo
dIstance being 6.3 leot longer lhan the deeded dl.lonce. 010n9
the We.l line of Ihe Soulheo.1 Quarter. Therelore. IhlS carn.r
wa. calculated by .plllllng lhe dlalonce between the Southweet
corner and Soulheo.t corner 01 the Secllon a. located. Thl$
calculaled corner loll. 4.25 leel Norlh and O. leet We.t of tho
PI< Noll localed. The Norlh line 01 the Soulheo.t Quorler wo.
d.termined by uolng a .plIl botween the Southoo.l corner 0$.
locoled and the Northeo.l corner o. ulobl lehed above wi th lhl
center of lhe .ectlon 01 localed bV tie,.
Tbe Iwo lrocla wh,ch adJOin lhe eublecl reol ..tale on Ihe Norll
hove 0 deedsd dlalonce 01 2633,20 leet belween lhe Soulhweal
corner and the Nodhwe.l corner of lhe Southeoat Quarler, wbllt
tba subjecl lrael hos a deed dialonc. 01 2638.45 leel bel ween Ih.
lome cornero, wh,ch cou..a a deed dl.crepancy 01 3.25 teel
However, botb 01 theae lracls are deocrlbed aa ..cepllone oul a
Ihe orlg'nol lrac!. Therelore, In determining Ihe boundary 0
Ihe .ublect real e.lO-le. lhe lead ,n dlelonce 01 19oo.45 lee
Iran the Soutbwe.t corner woa held, and Ihe two Irach 10 lb.
North were backed 'n IrClll Ihe Northw..1 carner A deed gap 0
15.53 leel exl.ls at Ihe Soulheasl corner 01 Ihe Iroct betwee
the sub leel real e.tote and.lhe real ..Iale o. descr Ibed III Oee
Book 276. poge 299.
~v~~
Slole o~ ..Indlona .(
County or,.tIlIIllllon)
Bofore me, lhe undersigned Notary Publ ic In ond for sold
County and Slale, per.onol Iy appeared Colv,n J. la..iter,
who ocknowledged execullon 01 the loregolng Record PIaL
Wltnea. my Hand ond Seal Ihla 01 day 01 MIJ..f . 1995
~ t,.7~ .DAw^,,~. p",rr"AI
NoloryPubllc ....jf. 9 5'
Nv Comor..'on Expore.: IY{~ 'I
County 01 Re.ldonce: ~ .
eot.t.IlSSION'S CERTIfiCATE
Sublect. real estate does nol lie within Q SpeCial Flood
Hazar:d Zone 'A" a. dellnealed In F.I.R.I.I. CClllI1VJnlty Panel
Number 160061 0003 C. federal Emergency Nanagemenl Agency,
Nollonal.flood Inlurance Program.
CERTlf lED FEBRUARY 15, 1995 ~\,\\"~~"IS"C"'O"'I'
!J ..,...:,...\. fll. ,,.1,....
~Qazt:. i~,..~...-..'i'....'I'.....~
. i~/:.'<.~~ Eo9'.<f"~\.
(/)f;oV ~ (' NO. OJ') ~
Donn lot. Scollen. l.S. . i {'1 5051O.1r ~
Re~!slered land Surveyor ~. STJlTEOF ~
Indiana No. 50510 '\ \. i
~ <'.of "'~"'DI~!)'. ~ ~
'lo""tiJ SU'R~'t~''''''
1111111111111\\\ .
Alarm lype lence runo generally along the Wes\erly rlghl-ol-wa
line.. 01 Ihe Chicago. Indlonapoll. and LOUisville Rollwoy ondl
localed belween i.O feet and 1.1 te.1 West 01 Ihe au"ey line.
As a reeult 01 Ihe above ob.orvaUon., II I. lilY opInIon thai II'
unc.rtolnlle. In locollon. 01 lhe line. and corners e.tabllsh.
on this survey are os follows:
Under Ihe oulhorlty provided bv Acls 01 1961. P.L. 309, Soc.
23, os amended by acla 01 1982, P.l. 211, enaclod by Ibe
General A.sembly 0/ Ibe Slale 01 Indlono. and oil ocla.
amendolory and supplemenlory thereto, and an ordinance
odopled by lbe conmon council 01 the City 01 Carmel,
Indlona., Ihls p.lol was g.ven approval by the Clly 01 Carmel,
os lollow.:
Adopted. !:l'.-c!.ho Carmel/Cloy Camnl..,on at
tb~ ((5"" dov 01 +,f
Carme I/C I ay P I on a" on
a meeting held on
1995.
6y:
BOARD Of COUNTY COM.IISSIONER'S CERTifiCATE
0) VaTlance In relerence monumenlo: 8.3 leel North and .South
b) Discreponc,ea In record do.cClpt Ion. and ploh: 3.25 ,e.
North and Soulh wllh Ihe Nodh odlolner.; 15.53 leet Soulh wll
Ihe Southeoel odla,ner .
cJ Incon..etenc... In lIne. 01 occupollon: 1.1 leel 10 1.0 te,
Eosl and Weal along EOllerly line..
d) Theorellcol Uncedolllly (due to
mea.ur....nla) 01 lhe corne" 01 Ihe eub lect
lhl. aurvey I. within lhe .pecllicaUons 01
0.25 leet) o. defined In I.A.C. 665.
Under outhorlly provided by Acts of 1961, enocled by the
General A..e....'y 01 Ihe Slale 01 Indiana, and all ocl.
omendatorv or supplemenlory therelo, thl. pial WO. gl.en
approvol by the Board of County Carmlasloners.9i Hamilton
Co~ Indlono. at. a moeUng held on Ihe 7#J day 01
d~l" , 1995.
Bor'~'.O~~h' County 01 Hamlllon
'CcmnlSlloner ~
~ A"-
C\ . ..Wd-l!A. .m.;./-.
"Conm s.lonor
AlL STREETS AND RIGHT-()f-WAYS SHQm ON THIS PLAT AND NOT HERETO
DEDICATED ARE HEREBY DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC.
randem errors .]
lrocl eat<>bllahed I
a Closs B survey (+,
Comni as lonCl(
A
H