HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
Page 1 of 1
Griffin, Matt L
From: Charlie Frankenberger [chalie@NF-LAW.COM]
Sent: Tuesday, June 06,2006 11 :58 AM
To: Hollibaugh, Mike P; Griffin, Matt L; Holmes, Christine B
Subject: Shelborne and Crook
Hi everyone,
Please show Shelborne and Crook as tabled and continued tonight, and returning to Subdivision Committee
on June 29. Thanks.
6/6/2006
0 1 oOOC
121 11 ro; tk 11 in IV
In CO I I I 1: :::.i.F
CIT '1" EL �.,.
April 27,2006 JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR RECEIVED \
APR 2 8 2006 1I
DOCS
Mr.David Lach,PE
Paul I Cripe
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250
RE: Crook Property Development Plan-Project Review#2
Dear Mr. Lach:
We have reviewed the Plan Certification form submitted on April 21,2006 and previously submitted
development plans. We offer the following comments:
GENERAL INFORMATION
This general information may be repeated with the submission of detailed construction plans for approval.
1. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits.
2. Jurisdictions:
• Streets and Right of Way—City of Carmel(Interior Subdivision Streets/136'h Street)
• Water—City of Carmel Utilities
• Sanitary Sewers—Clay Township Regional Waste District Service Area
• Storm Sewers/Drainage—Hamilton County Surveyor's Office/City of Carmel.
• Legal Drains—Hamilton County Surveyor's Office.
3. Board of Public Works and Safety Requirements:
• Water Availability Approval.
- Single Family Residential. Approval request from the Board is based upon the total
number of single-family units/lots within the development/individual sections of the
development. Reference Item#11 below for a more detailed explanation.
- Townhomes. Approval request from the Board is based upon the total number of
townhome units and number of bedrooms per unit.
- If a community swimming pool or bathhouse is planned,additional Water
Availability approval from the Board will be required and additional Water
Connection Fees will be assessed. If entryway or other community irrigation
systems are planned,these will also require additional Water Availability approval
from the Board and additional Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon
the size and usage of the system.
• Temporary Construction Entrance approval if the location is at a site other than a permanent
curb cut on 136th Street. Submission requirements are the same as for commercial curb cut.
• Any permanent improvement to be installed within dedicated right of way or dedicated
easements. This approval would require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the
Owner and the City of Carmel.
• Secondary Plat approval if applicable.
• Dedication of Right of Way if not platted.
I am also enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda
deadlines for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the
Board.
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
ONE Civic SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAx 317.571.2439
EMAIL engineering @ci.carmel.in.us
Any submission to the Board requires prior approval by the Carmel Clay Plan Commission
and/or the Board of Zoning Appeals(if applicable)and completion of review by the Technical
Advisory Committee. All written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must include the
appropriate Docket Number and the date(or dates)of approval by the Plan Commission and/or
the Board of Zoning Appeals Of applicable).
4. T.A.C.Review/Drawings submitted for approval:
We request that all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing
and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be
approved for construction until all Engineering Department,Utility Department and Hamilton
County Surveyor issues have been resolved. The design engineer must certify all drawings
submitted for fmal approval. Due to the dual jurisdiction between the City and the Hamilton
County Surveyor,this office will require eight-sets of drawings to be submitted for approval after
all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be stamped as approved and will be signed by
the City Engineer and Director of Carmel Utilities. The drawings are to be submitted to the
Hamilton County Surveyor for approval. Distribution of approved drawings will be 2-sets to City
of Carmel Engineering, 1-set to Cannel Utilities,2-sets to the Hamilton County Surveyor and 1-
set each to the Developer,the Project Engineer and Contractor.
5. Please be advised that any installation of signs,walls, irrigation systems,etc.within dedicated
right of way or dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement with the City
of Carmel. This agreement,with the exception of irrigation systems,requires BPWS approval.
The City Engineer may approve irrigation system agreements.
6. Carmel Utilities should be provided drawings for review of water systems and issues. They will
provide a separate review regarding these issues.
7. Carmel Utilities does subscribe to"Holey Moley"who should be contacted directly for all water
main locations.
8. I am including copies of the following with this correspondence:
• Subdivision Project Approval Procedures
• Performance Release Procedure
• Subdivision Building Permits
• Permit Data, Contacts,etc.
• Street Signage Requirements
BONDING REQUIREMENTS
9. Upon initial review,it appears the following bonding requirements may apply to this project:
Performance Guarantees/Engineer's Estimates
• Streets(base,binder and surface must be bonded together)
• Curb&Gutters
• Water Mains
• Street Signs(Street name signs/posts/brackets only. Do not include traffic control signage.
These require City Ordinances approved by the City of Cannel Council and are not to be
installed by the Developer.)
• Sidewalks(Interior-builders lot right of way sidewalks and Exterior-common area/perimeter
right of way sidewalks/asphalt paths may be bonded separately).
• Right of Way Improvements may be bonded separately. This could include accel/decel lanes,
passing blister,pavement widening,thermoplastic striping, stone shoulders,curbs,etc.
• Erosion control
The amount of the Performance Guarantee is based upon a certified Engineer's Estimate for 100%
of the cost of labor and materials to construct the individual improvements,to be provided by the
design engineer. Please provide detailed Engineer's Estimates for each improvement including
quantities,unit costs,pipe sizes and materials,etc. Upon completion and release of individual
Performance Guarantees,a three-year Maintenance Guarantee will be required. The Maintenance
Guarantee amount is based upon 15%of the Performance amount for Streets and Curbs and 10%
of the Performance amount for all other improvements. Performance Guarantees may be
Performance or Subdivision Bonds or Irrevocable Letters of Credit. Please reference the
enclosures for more detailed explanation of our procedures.
Note:The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office will require bonding for Storm Sewers/Storm
Drainage and for Monuments&Markers. Please contact the Clay Township Regional Waste
District regarding Sanitary Sewer bonding requirements.
Right of Way Permit and Bonding
Any work in the dedicated right of way of 136th Street and/or the portion of Azteca Lane in the
Westwood Estates subdivision will require an approved Right of Way Permit and a License&
Permit Bond. The bond amount is determined by the number of instances of work in the right of
way at$2,000.00 per instance. However, if the work is included in the scope of work of a
required and posted Performance Guarantee,the Performance Guarantee may be used to satisfy
the bond requirements of the Right of Way Permit. Please contact our Right of Way Manager,
Fred Glaser,to arrange right of way permitting and bonding.
10. We have engaged Crossroad Engineers,PC to review all drainage plans and drainage calculations
submitted to this office for review. We will share Crossroad's comments as they are received.
When construction plans are submitted for review for this development,please provide a set of
drawings and drainage calculations directly to Crossroad.
AVAILABILITY AND CONNECTION FEES
11. Availability(acreage)Fees must be paid after all other Engineering Department requirements
have been satisfied and prior to approval and start of construction activities. Availability Fees are
based upon total platted acreage or legal description acreage for the development at the current
rate of$1,010.00 per acre for Water Availability. Although a legal description was not included in
the plans,based upon the indicated acreage on the Cover Sheet,the following Availability Fees,
subject to final approval,would apply:
Water—20.37 Acres @$1,010.00/Acre=$20,574.00
Connection Fees-Based on the drawings submitted,there appear to be 40 residential lots. Water
Connection Fees are based upon the current Water Connection Fee of$1,310.00 per 1.0
EDU/single family residential building lot. Connection Fees are paid when the infrastructure has
been completed,satisfactory test results obtained and the development has been released for
building permits.
The Availability and Connections Fees are current as of this date but are subject to future
revisions.
If an irrigation system,swimming pool or clubhouse is planned for this development,additional
Water Connection Fees will be assessed based upon the recommendations of the Director of
Cannel Utilities.
PROJECT COMMENTS
The Department of Engineering understands that the project is currently seeking a re-zone
of the subject property. The majority of the comments are primary plat,and secondary
plat/construction drawing issues. It is not apparent that the latest plan addressed any of
these items. The Department will expect all comments outlined in this letter to be addressed
as the project progresses. Items 12-38 should be considered as"unapproved"by this
department as a part of any upcoming City approvals.
12. Please revise such that the radius for each horizontal curve is a minimum of 150 feet.
13. Please indicate subsurface drains beneath the curb on both sides of all streets.
14. Please indicate and label the right-of-way of 136th Street.
15. There is not enough information to tell whether or not the geometry at the entrance is correct.
Needed dimensions include the width of the existing 136th Street pavement,the distance from the
existing pavement centerline to the existing edge of pavement,the width of the proposed
widening,and the widths of the auxiliary lanes.
16. Please provide ADA ramps where the entrance crosses the asphalt path and at all interior street
intersections.
17. The widths of all interior streets must be shown
18. The width of the exit lane at the entrance shall be a maximum of eighteen feet wide.
19. All lots adjacent to side yard easements must be wide enough to accommodate the anticipated
house model and any planned driveways such that there is no encroachment in the easements.
20. Please indicate widening across the property frontage or to the extents of the auxiliary lanes,
whichever is greater for 15-foot travel lanes on the property side of 136th Street.Auxiliary lanes
shall be measured from the edge of the 15-foot travel lane.Please add a note to the site plan that
all existing pavement shall be sawcut to a clean edge where new pavement(for widening or for
auxiliary lanes)is to be installed adjacent to existing pavement.Any new pavement placed in the
136th Street right-of-way for widening, for auxiliary lanes and for each entrance up to the mainline
right-of-way limit shall meet the following section: 1.5 inches HMA#11 surface on 2 inches
HMA#8 binder on 3 inches HMA#5D base on 7 inches#53 stone on 4 inches#2 stone or match
existing,whichever is greater.Please delineate this section with hatching on the plans and
appropriate reference in the legend. Please indicate widening on the road cross-section.
21. The City typically requires 1"milling with 1.5"H.A.C.#11 resurfacing for the entire width of the
existing roadway across the property frontage or to the limits of the auxiliary lanes,whichever is
greater.The roadway would then also need to be restriped with thermoplastic striping.Please
develop a plan for the restriping and for striping of the auxiliary lanes.Please add a note to this
plan that all striping shall be thermoplastic.Please delineate the milling and resurfacing areas with
hatching on the plans and appropriate reference in the legend.
22. Please edit or provide a detail which requires the following pavement section for the paving of the
proposed interior public streets: 1.5 inches HMA#11 surface on 2 inches HMA#8 binder on 3
inches HMA#5D base on 7 inches#53 stone.Please add a note that all paving must be completed
in one paving season.
23. Please add an Asphalt Path Detail that requires 1 inch HMA#11 surface on 2 inches HMA#8
binder on 5 inches#53 stone if the proposed multi-use paths will not be concrete.
24. Please add the Department Standard Sub-Surface Drain detail.
25. A three-foot wide#73 stone shoulder at a minimum depth of six inches is required across the
property frontage or to the limits of the auxiliary lanes,whichever is greater. Subsurface drain is
required beneath the stone shoulder.
26. All paving within the existing and proposed City right-of-way shall conform to the requirements
• of the Department of Engineering.Please add a note to the drawings that the Contractor shall
contact the Department of Engineering to schedule a pre-construction meeting to review the
Department's construction requirements,staff notification requirements,required inspections for
certain stages of the work and to review the authority of the Department as it relates to work
within the existing and proposed City right-of-way.
27. Please provide a maintenance of traffic plan.
28. Please include the note"THERE SHALL BE NO WATER VALVES OR MANHOLES WITHIN
THE PAVEMENT,CURBS,OR SIDEWALKS"on all appropriate sheets.
29. The Board of Public Works and Safety must approve any open cuts of the 136th Street pavement
and/or the existing Azteca Lane pavement in the Westwood Estates Subdivision.
30. Please contact Crossroad Engineers to obtain drainage review checklist for consideration in
developing secondary plat and that design effort. The Department would expect the secondary
plat and construction drawings submitted to conform to the requirements of the checklist.
31. Please provide detention volume for the fully developed site and for the fully developed
thoroughfare plan right-of-way for the 136th Street frontage. This requirement shall apply
regardless of watershed limits. Please provide adequately sized pipes to carry water from the
street to the proposed ponds.
32. If off-site easements will be necessary to install the utilities,these easements must be secured prior
to the Department of Engineering approving the drawings.
33. The Department requires that the construction drawings be developed in accordance with the City
of Carmel digital submission standards and that all required submittals for primary plat,secondary
plat,and construction drawings be made.
34. The City has adopted a new paving policy. Please revise any notes,specifications,and details to
accommodate this policy. The language of these policies must be added to a specification sheet on
the plans.
35. The City has adopted a new curbing policy. Please revise any notes,specifications,and details to
accommodate this policy.The language of these policies must be added to a specification sheet on
the plans.
36. The Department of Engineering recalls discussion of a stub of Street"D"to the west. What was
decided?
37. Sheet RF: Accel/decal lanes do not meet the City's standards.
38. Sheet RF: Must indicate a passing blister.
These comments represent the Department of Engineering's initial review of the development plans for this
project. We request that all responses to our comments be provided in writing. Failure to provide written
responses may result in the delay of the review process.
It is critical that this office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-submitted,
particularly if any such changes are considered"new"or fall outside of our previous reviews. Please
provide revised plans including all revisions. Please notify us of any changes and specifically state any
changes,including changes resulting from Plan Commission,BZA or other committee meetings.
All bonds and performance guarantees must be posted prior to Engineering Department approval of
construction plans. Board of Public Works and Safety approvals and any other governing agency approvals
(if required)must be obtained prior to Engineering Department approval. All performance guarantees must
be posted prior to submission of secondary plats for Board of Public Works and Safety approval.
The Department reserves the right to provide additional comments based upon subsequent reviews and on
the grading and drainage system upon receipt of drainage calculations and more detailed construction
drawings that provide grading elevations,pipe sizing and invert elevations. These comments may affect
the drainage system layout presented on the development plans.
If you have questions,please call me at 571-2441.
Since
if*4
lt% . 'unc. ,J .P.E.
Yr
Assistant Ci Engineer
Department i f Engineering
Enclosures
Cc: Matt Griffin,Department of Community Services
John Duffy,Director Carmel Utilities
Paul Pace,Cannel Utilities Distribution
Greg Ilko,Crossroad Engineers
Greg Hoyes,Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Paul Shoopman,Indiana Land Development Corp.
Engineering File Copy
Engineering Department Review
S:\PROJREV06\CROOKPROPERTYRE V#2
NELSON
&
FRANKENBERGER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEY
3105 EAST 98TH STREET
SUITE 170
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280
317-844-0106
FAX: 317-846-8782
JAMES J. NELSON
CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER
JAMES E. SHlNA VER
LARRY J. KEMPER
JOHN B. FLATT
FREDRIC LAWRENCE
DAVID J. LICHTENBERGER
OF COUNSEL
JANE B. MERRILL
April 21, 2006
/
"
,
i "
i
I
i
\
\
'\
'-.
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Matt Griffin
Department of Community Services
One Civic Center
Carmel, IN 46032
".
/'"
RE: Indiana Land Development -- Crook
Docket No. 06010009 Z
May 4, 2006 Subdivision Committee Meeting
Dear Matt:
Enclosed are 15 informational brochures for distribution to the Subdivision Committee
members for the May 4, 2006 meeting. Should you have any questions, please contact me. As always,
thank you for your help.
Very truly yours,
NELSON & FRANKENBERGER
C'-
Charles D. Frankenberger
CDF/bd
Enclosures
H:lbrad\Zoning & Real Estate MatlerslIndiana Land Dev\Crook\Griffin 042106.doc
B3/3B/20B6 B5:B5
3178736725
PERSONAL BANKEP
PAGE B2
I.
To: Subdivision Committee Members
From: Marilyn Anderson ~""i)v&..
Date: March 30. 2006 A~:~
Re: Shelbome Property PUD~~~.
I am sorry I missed the previous committee meeting and am unable to attend tonight's
meeting. I wanted you to know that the issues I raised still matter very much and my
absence is not a lack of concern. In particular, I question what justification there is for
these PUD~. other than to raise density. The rezones impact the surrounding developed
and undeveloped properties and will influence what the new Comp Plan will be like.-
before it's even determined what is best for the area.
Likewise, there is no ordinance requiring a certain level of quality as a trade for higher
density. I believe this kind of trade should occur only after commWlity input has helped
formulate an ordinance requiring specific upgrades per x amount of increased density.
I'd like to remind you that under ROSO, at would have required about 45% open space
preservation in order to reach a density of about 1.8. These PUD request are entirely too
much density for the little amoWlt of improved quality to which the developer is
commining.
i
_C fit-0001 r
iti�
/
AreVelM
April 7, 2006
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250 Mr. Greg Hayes
317-842-6777 Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
FAX:317-841-4798 Suite 188
www.cripe.biz
One Hamilton Square
Noblesville, IN 46060
• Architecture
RE: CROOK PROPERTY
Dear Mr. Hayes:
• Construction
Administration We have received your comment letter, dated January 10, 2006 regarding the
referenced project. Here are our responses to your comments.
• Engineering 1. Comment noted.
2. Comment noted.
• Geographic 3. Comment noted.
Information
Services 4. Comment noted.
5. We are requesting variances against the new Hamilton County Stormwater
Landscape Management Technical Standards Manual.
• Architecture 6. Comment noted. If street trees are placed between the curb and sidewalk
then they shall be dual walled to prevent root infiltration.
• Land Planning 7. Construction plans, secondary plat, and drainage calculations will be
submitted when they are available.
8. Comment noted.
• Land Surveying
9. Noted.
• Real Estate If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 317-842-6777.
Consulting
Sincerely,
• Transportation
Engineering PAUL I. CRIPE, INC.
Christopher M. Wiseman, P.E.
Project Manager
cc: Nicholas Redden, City of Carmel — Engineering
Gregory Ilko, Crossroads Engineering
Matt Griffin, City of Carmel — Planning
File
0:\20051050373120000\docs\Permits\TAC\CommentRespanseLetters\HamCaSurv_GHoyes_040706_Itr1.doc
SINt,
ON
_3__.11 �_,* 111
r
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250
317-842-6777
FAX:317-841-4798
www.cripe.biz April 7, 2006
• Architecture Mr. Steve Cook
Mr. Paul Arnone
City of Carmel Water-Wastewater Utilities
• Construction 130 1st Avenue SW
Administration Carmel, IN 46032
•
Engineering RE: CROOK PROPERTY
Dear Mr. Cook and Mr. Arnone:
• Geographic
Information We have received your comment letter, dated February 28, 2006 regarding the
Services reference project. We will forward you copies of the Secondary Plat and
Construction Plans and details once they are complete for your review.
• Landscape If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 317-842-6777.
Architecture
Sincerely,
• Land Planning
PAUL I. CRIPE, INC.
409• Land Surveying
Christopher M. Wiseman, P.E.
• Real Estate Project Manager
Consulting
cc: Nicholas Redden, City of Carmel - Engineering
Grey Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveryor's Office
• Transportation Matt Griffin, City of Carmel - Planning
Engineering
File
0:\2005\050373\200001docs\Permits\TAC\CommentResponseLetters\Carmel W UtiI_040706.doc
! 4
0009 - - -f-
ailTdazi
April 7, 2006
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250 Mr. Nicholas J. Redden, P.E.
317-842-6777 Department of Engineering
FAX: 317-841-4798 City of Carmel
www.cripe.biz
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: CROOK PROPERTY
• Architecture
Dear Mr. Redden:
• Construction
Administration We have received your comment letter, dated February 10, 2006 regarding the
referenced project. Here are our responses to your comments.
• Engineering 1. Distances will be shown on future drawings. From existing information, the
proposed entrance is located greater than 500' from the intersection of
13t6th St. and Towne Rd., and the intersection of 136th St. And Spotswood
• Geographic St.
Information
Services 2. From inspection of the site layout, all internal intersections are separated by
at least 150 feet. The intersection of Azteca Lane and 136th St. is 232.83 feet
from the intersection of Azteca Lane and Winslow Drive. Additionally the
• Landscape intersection of Azteca Lane and Winslow View Drive is 343 feet from the
Architecture intersection of Winslow Drive and Winslow View Drive. Please clarify any
internal intersections believe not to comply with this requirement.
• Land Planning 3. The entrance will be revised to include a 10-foot entrance island and 18-foot
drive lanes on each side of the entrance island.
4. We are requesting a variance to allow for the minimum horizontal curve radii
• Land Surveying to match our plans to accommodate curves on Azteca Lane and Winslow
Drive.
• Real Estate 5. All street intersections meet at an angle of 90 degrees. Please clarify any
Consulting intersection believed not to comply with this requirement.
6. Please explain in further detail the certain improvements and commitments
• Transportation for future improvements for the frontage of the development.
Engineering
7. The comment has been noted. Required detention volumes and pipe sizes
will be provided as the drainage design progresses.
8. A 45-foot half right-of-way is proposed to be dedicated along 136th Street as
required for a secondary arterial street per the thoroughfare plan.
9. A 10 foot asphalt multi-use path is proposed along 136th Street as required
by the Alternative Transportation Plan.
10. Comment note.
11. Proposed sidewalks are shown as 5 feet as required in city standards.
O:\2005\050373120000\docs\Permits\TAC\CommentResponseLetters\Crml Eng_NRedden_040706.doc
4 -
`1.
12. A passing blister of 12 foot lane width, with 150 foot entrance and exit tapers, along with an
80 foot passing lane is provided opposite of the intersection of 136th Street and Azteca
Lane, as required for 136th Street, which is designated a secondary arterial per the
thoroughfare plan, a 150 foot deceleration lane, 100 foot stacking, and 250 foot
acceleration lane are proposed.
13. The Plan Certification Form is being completed and will be returned to the Department of
Engineering.
Comments specific to Crook Property.
1. After investigation, the entrance off 136th Street is located greater than 500 feet from the
entrance to the Village of West Clay. This shall be detailed on the Construction
Documents.
2. The site plan has been corrected to provide a 45-foot half right-of-way for 136th Street.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 317-842-6777.
Sincerely,
PAUL I. CRIPE, INC.
Christopher M. Wiseman, P.E.
cc: Greg Ilko, Crossroads Engineering
Greg Hayes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Matt Griffin, City of Carmel — Planning
File
Attached: Plan Certification Form
0' 50373\20000\docs\Permits\TAC\CommentResponseLetters\CrmlEng_N Redden_040706,doc
L 11,61%4gAlgiak
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250
317-842-6777
FAX:317-841-4798
www.cripe.biz
April 7, 2006
• Architecture
Mr. Greg Ilko, P.E.
Construction CrossRoad Engineers, P.C.
• Administration 3417 South Sherman Drive
Beech Grove, IN 46107
• Engineering RE: CROOK PROPERTY
Dear Mr. Ilko:
• Geographic
Information We have received your comment letter, dated February 22, 2006 regarding the
Services referenced project. Here are our responses to your comments.
• Landscape Upon approval of the primary plat, we will be submitting secondary plat, construction
Architecture documents, and drainage calculations for your review and acceptance.
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact me at 317-842-6777.
• Land Planning
Sincerely,
• Land Surveying PAUL I. CRIPE, INC.
• Real Estate •
Consulting Christopher M. Wiseman, P.E.
Project Manager
• Transportation
Engineering cc: Nicholas Redden, City of Carmel — Engineering
Greg Noyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
Matt Griffin, City of Carmel— Planning
File
0:\2005\050373\200001docs\Permits\TAC1CommentResponseLetters\Crossroads_G Ilko_040706.doc
Message
Page lof2
Conn, Angelina V
From: Dutcher, Dan [ddutcher@ncaa.org]
Sent: Thursday, March 30, 2006 11 :29 AM
To: rripma@usavingsbank.com; schleif@indy.rr.com; whaney1393@aol.com; kevin@indianatrails.org
Cc: Griffin, Matt L; Conn, Angelina V
Subject: Comments re this evening's Subdivision cases
Colleagues:
My regrets that basketball related duties will prevent me from joining you tonight. I did want to forward a few
thoughts for you to consider in my absence.
I think we all saw Jerry's message yesterday regarding the premature consideration of incomplete petitions. I
echo that statement, and the related feedback I have seen so far. It appears the department is recommending
that
1. Has been continued to May 4.
2. Recommend approval.
3. Recommend approval.
4. Shelborne PUD. I agree with the department that this should be continued to May 4 because of several
important outstanding issues.
. There is a much description of recreational uses (paths, playground, public space, etc.) than last time we
saw this.
. One question--we need to be we balance the rec paths with tree preservation. The path network in the
common area might be too extensive.
. We will need to decide the window and porch issue. In each case the PUD standards are slightly below
city guidelines. If I had to choose one over the other, I would chose for the second widow over the extra 2
feet of porch depth, but why not get both?
5. Crook PUD. Same basic comments as with No.4.
6. Aramore PUD. I agree with the department that this should be continued to May 4 because of several
important outstanding issues.
. Are there applicable design standards that the department could use to compare with those included in the
the PUD?
. I really didn't see a landscape plan.
. I think there needs to be more buffering and landscaping along 98th street.
7. Stafford Lane. I agree with the department that this should be continued to May 4.
. I agree with the department and the neighbors--the entrance road design is unacceptable. The current
design unnecessarily affects Copperwood to the west. It also bisects the common area. They need to
back to the drawing board.
8. Woods at Lions Creek. I agree with the department that this should be continued to May 4 because of several
important outstanding issues.
. I believe this is the first request we have seen for a gated community since we approved the new gate
standards. The department should review in detail how the proposal meets (or fails to meet) each
criterion. The petitioners have not asked for a gate/private street waiver, but I believe that will still be
necessary? We established new standards to consider when a wavier is requested, rather than eliminating
3/30/2006
Message
Page 2 of2
the waiver requirement.
. I also think we need a comparison of the city's design guidelines with what is being proposed. Yes, I know
this is a high end development, but let's check, not just assume, that the city standards are exceeded in
every case. A summary statement from the department to that effect would suffice.
. I don't think I have seem a design before where individual lot owners actually share a portion of ponds. Do
they really want this?
. Likewise, there is no access to the main common area pond. Should there be?
. The main common area runs along the gas line. They really don't do much with this. Should/could there
be some kind of minimal gravel path installed that could then link up the common area in Bellwood to the
south?
. The gate/cul-de-sac and access waivers are all tied together. I don't have a problem with the other two
(frontage and thoroughfare). But we need to be sure there are commitments for landscaping and buffering
for the lots affected by the thoroughfare waiver.
9. Michigan Road Overlay. As the attached article from the LBJ indicates, Zionsville also seems to be going in
this direction. I think the dept's rational for a gradual transition makes sense. I would support moving this
forward.
10. 96th and Westfield Plan. This obviously is a hornet's nest. Fairly complicated and politically charged. We
really need to take our time with this, be sure to hear from all sides and understand the many issues.
Thanks.
Dan Dutcher
Vice-President for Div. III
NCAA
ddutcher@ncaa.org
www.ncaa.org
This email and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged
information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the
sender immediately by return email, delete this message and destroy any
copies. Any dissemination or use of this information by a person other
than the intended recipient is unauthorized and may be illegal.
3/30/2006
NELSON
&
FRANKENBERGER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JAMES J. NELSON
CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER
JAMES E. SlllNA VER
LARRY J. KEMPER
IOHNB.FLAIT
FREDRIC LAWRENCE
DAVID J. LICHTENBERGER
OF COUNSEL
JANE B. MERRILL
3105 EAST 98TH STREET
SUITE 170
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280
317-844-0106
FAX: 317-846-8782
March 20, 2006
VIA HAND DELIVERY
Matt Griffin
Department of Community Services
One Civic Center
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: Indiana Land Development -- Crook
Docket No. 06010009 Z
March 30, 2006 Subdivision Committee Meeting
Dear Matt:
Enclosed are 15 informational brochures for distribution to the Subdivision Committee
members for the March 30, 2006 meeting. Should you have any questions, please contact me. As
always, thank you for your help.
Very truly yours,
NELSON & FRANKENBERGER
c::;'-
Charles D. Frankenberger
CDF/bd
Enclosures
H:1brad\Indiana Land Dev\Crook\Griftin 032006.doc
Homp-& Garden Television: Universal Design
~"J""
Page 1 of2
Home & Garden Television
To print this page, select File then Print from your browser
URL: http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/dc_design_universaLdesign/article/0.1793.HGTV_3385_1963603.00.html
Facts About Universal Design
By Scripps Howard News Service
May 15, 2003
Besides Pima County, a southern Arizona county that includes Tucson, there are four states and six cities that have adopted various
universal design mandates, even though they apply only to publicly funded housing. They are
. Atlanta
. Austin, Texas
. Urbana, III.
. Naperville, III.
. Iowa City, Iowa
. Long Beach, Calif.
. Texas
. Georgia
. Florida
. Kansas
Examples of universal design requirements:
. The ground floor must have one accessible route, at least 32 inches wide, through the entire floor, which cannot pass through
bedrooms or closets.
. There must be at least one no-step entry to the house, whether in the front, back or garage.
. The entry should be at least 32 inches wide.
. Interior doors must be at least 30 inches wide.
. Door hardware, such as levers, cannot require any grasping, pinching, or twisting of the wrist to operate.
. Bathroom walls must be reinforced for the option of adding grab bars.
. Light controls, electrical outlets and thermostats must be easily reached from a wheelchair.
-Source: Pima County Board of Supervisors
Other universal design features that are being used voluntarily in some new home construction, primarily in developments marketed to
people over 50:
. Full bath and master bedroom on the main level
. Windows that can be opened with minimal effort
. Covered porches
. Wider hallways and interior doorways
. Lower kitchen cabinets with roll-out and pull-down shelving
. Multi-level counters in the kitchen
. Extra lighting, especially in bedrooms and bathrooms
. Raised toilets
. Non-slip floors
. Laundry chutes
. Landscaped ramps to the front entrance
. Raised garden beds that are reachable from a wheelchair
. No-threshold, large showers with either built-in steps or stools
. Front-loading washer and dryer
http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/cdalarticle--print/0.1983.HGTV _3385 _1963603 _ ARTICLE-DET AIL-PRINT,O... 31712006
Home & Garden Television: Universal Design
- ~
Page 2 of2
-Source: National Association of Homebuilders.
http://www.hgtv.com/hgtv/cda/article-.print/O. 1983,HGTV _3385_1963603 _ ARTICLE-DET AIL-PRINT,O... 3/7/2006
INDIANA
Land Development
February 21, 2006
. .
Crook Development Commitments
The purpose of this paper is to document a number of commitments made by Mr. Paul
Shoopman, President & CEO ofIndiana Land Development Corporation, to a representative
group of Westwood Estates residents on February 18,2006. These commitments relate to the
development of the Crook property in Carmel Indiana. They will be incorporated appropriately
into the.\\Crook Development project by Indiana Land Development Corp. A signed copy of this
commitment paper will be given to the City of Carmel Plan Commission on February 21,2006
with the request that it be included in the zoning laws for the Crook development project. This
piece of business is on the Committee's agenda for that day (Docket No. 06010009 Z).
Buffer Zone & Drainage System - Northern Border of Crook, Adjoining
the Westwood Estates Community
1. Drainage System. Drainage particulars along the northern border will be defined during an
upcoming engineering phase of the project. Expectations are that additional footage, not
currently defined in the project plan, will need to be allocated for this effort. Any Crook
drainage will need tp be managed within the Crook system, not discharged into the swale that
currently exits on thF Westwood border side. (We agree.)
2. Buffer Zone. A buffer zone between the Crook and Westwood Estates communities that is
10+ feet wide will be installed. It will be separate from any footage that may be required for
the drainage system, i.e., if 10 feet are allocated for drainage along the northern border then at
least another 10+ feet will be allocated for the buffer zone just south of it. This buffer zone
will span the entire length of the northern border area of Crook, on both sides of Azteca Lane.
(We agree to a 10' wide buffer easement.)
3. Berm in Buffer Zone. Mr. Shoopman stated that there is a high probability that a landscape
berm could be built that encompasses the buffer zone. This is contingent on the results of the
engineering assessment, which will include oversight input from the City of Carmel
engineering staff. The height and width of the berm will depend on the composition of the
drainage system that is installed for that northern border area. (We agree to mound within the
10' buffer easement to Carmel standards.)
4. Type of Buffer Zone Trees. Mature, Black Hills Spruce trees that are 12-15 feet in height
will be planted in the buffer zone. The trees will be positioned about 10 feet apart in a saw-
tooth design. Exact placement of the trees is contingent on any requirements that the City of
Carmel may impose. A Spruce variety that is comparable in size and heartiness would be
acceptable if the Black Hills variety is not available. Here is an Internet link for a view of the
Black Hills Spruce. http://www.arborday.org/shopping/trees/TreeDetail.cfm?lD=174 (We
agree except our spacing wouldbe 12' - 6"separation not 1 0'.)
5. Maintenance for Buffer Zone Trees. Include specific language in the Crook Homeowners
Association Covenants, Conditions & Restrictions, to guarantee the health and survivability
of the Spruce trees in the buffer zone, i.e., ensure that the trees are watered, fertilized,
mulched and pruned appropriately; ensure that any tree that may die is removed and then
replaced with one of the same variety of comparable size to others on either side of it and
within a t,;easonable period of time, etc. (We agree.)
Indiana Land Development Corporation
8170ZionsvilleRd - Indianapolis, IN 46268 - (317)415-0459 - (317)415-0466 Fax
I
\\V~;t
Ii.:~ 415.0459
General Architectural Standards
1. Vinyl Siding. As far as non-masonry materials go, only Hardy Plank will be used for homes
built in Crook. Vinyl Siding will be forbidden. (We agree to hardy plank material type
products. )
2. Recreational Equipment for Crook. Above ground swimming pools will be forbidden.
Swing sets will be allowed, but they must be made out of wood and stained. In addition, for
lot 38, no paved basketball or tennis courts/areas, or the equivalent thereof, will be allowed.
(Lot #38 tennis courts and basketball courts are not allowed in the rear yard.)
3. Exterior Buildings & Structures. No separate, freestanding buildings, temporary or
permanent, will be allowed. Fences will be allowed, but chain-link or comparable quality
materials will not be allowed. (We agree.)
4. Brick or Stone on Lower Level. Mr. Shoopman committed to consider establishing a higher
quality building standard for the exterior surface of the home that will be built on lot 38 in
Crook. It would stipulate that the home have at least 3 sides of the lower lever constructed
with brick or stone. Additional consideration would be given for homes that will be built on
lots 36 and 37. (We agree to require the first floor level to be masonry on lot 38.)
5. Distinguished Feature at North Entrance. Build a quality architectural feature at the north
entrance/exit point on Azteca Lane, between Crook and Westwood Estates. We talked about
thick pillars that would include high quality, embedded community identification plaques.
This feature would be constructed on the Crook side of the entrance. In addition, a speed-
bump would be installed in the road to slow down traffic. (We agree to ask Carmel for
permission for an entry monumentation in between the communities. We'll ask about the
speed bumps, yet we can't guarantee them.
All of this, of course, shall be subject to Carmel's approval and the County's approval of all
development and architectural standards. We appreciate your assistance and ask that you sign
and fax this back to 317-415-0466 prior to our meeting.
fJ 1-/12-./ C-1;:'/9 71/'l/<,
For\W twood Estates Residents
?,-2/-ofc,
J k Ba z Date
20 negade Court
Carmel, IN 46032
Cc: Jack & Renee Bartz
Richard & Cherie V oege
Carl & Suzy Mills
Henna & Richard Bums
Marilyn & Suzanne Ritting
Chris Miller Dir. Of Operations for Justus Homes
Accepted for Indiana Land Development Corporation
8170 Zionsville Road
India po s, IN 46268
)~ / Li / 6 ~
Date
Indiana Land Development Corporation
8170 Zionsville Rd - Indianapolis, IN 46268 - (317) 415-0459 - (317) 415-0466 Fax
INDIANA
Land Development
. .
February 20, 2006
Jack Bartz
2087 Renegade Court
Carmel, IN 46032
Dear Jack:
Thanks for your response and your assistance. I would like to respond in your order.
Crook Development Commitments
1. We agree.
2. We agree to a 10' wide buffer easement.
3. We agree to a mound within the 10' buffer easement to Carmel standards.
4. We agree except our spacing would be 12' - 6' separation not 10'.
5. We agree.
General Architectural Standards
1. We agree to hardy plank material type products.
2. We agree except for Lot #38 tennis courts and basketball courts. We would not be able to exclude
these items especially with the covenants we've made on mound and landscaping tree buffering.
3. We agree.
4. We agree to require the first floor level to be masonry on lot 38.
5. We agree to ask Carmel for permission for an entry monumentation in between the communities.
We'll ask about the speed bumps, yet we can't guarantee them.
All of this, of course, shall be subject to Carmel's approval and the County's approval of all development
and architectural standards. We appreciate your assistance and ask that you sign and fax this back to 317-
415-0466 prior to our meeting.
For Westwood Estates Residents
Jack Bartz
2087 Renegade Court
Carmel, IN 46032
Date
Accepted for Indiana Land Development Corporation
8170 Zionsville Road
Indianapolis, IN 46268
Paul Shoopman
President and CEO
Date
Indiana Land Development Corporation
8170 Zionsville Rd - Indianapolis, IN 46268 . (317) 415-0459 - (317) 415-0466 Fax
1 >
Carmel 6110(e Deparimrnent
•
P n`
I
February 20, 2006 )
David Lach, PE ® 4l 1�
Cripe
7172 Graham Road ,-
Indianapolis, IN 46250 /
RE: Development Plan for Shelborne
CDevelop.menVPlanrforC rook^Propertyj
Development Plan for Guerrero Property
Dear Mr. Lach:
I have received and reviewed the information for the above mentioned
projects.
At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law
enforcement efforts.
If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully,
friad4,..a D.Michael D. Fogarty
Chief of Police
MDF:vb
cc: /Dept. of Community Services
Asa , ;
4 �r
(3171)571-2500 A Nationally AccrediteVI4ignforcement Agency Fag(317)571-2512
oop"90-9L-Z atll Tll do mood\soop\0000e\EL£oco\9ooz\o 5 N"I,D
No
LOO OSI
6uuaaui6u3
uo//epodsueaa .
6u///nsuo9
a/els3/eat/ .
5w/1.e/tins pue? .
6L4uue/d pue? •
•3*d `uewas!M sug3
aan/oa/lyoa y
r) - edeospue-i .
'3N1 '3d1213 I lfldd seowes
uol/ewaoJu/
Alaaaouls o/ydea5o90
'esuodsei pue awll ano/(aoj nog( ){ueyl
6uuee4u3 •
.aoi}}o ano o;swawwoo Aue paeNuoj pue lewwgns ;eyl Jo Tied e se Malnaa aseald
_ .900Z `gi_IGenue' uo eui;aaw oyl eul le paluasaad slefiwgns ay} o; suolslnaa ale
900Z '01. /Genage j punoae ao uo no o} pa;;lwgns aaaM Tey;sueld ;uawdolanaa ayl uo//ea;s/u/tupy
uopona/suoo .
:waouoa AeW H woyM of •
406 an oa/t/oay
kien�q a uo I efl w q n ue Id ;uawdo I ena (padoa d �l 001�
�32I
Z£09i7 NI lawaeO
aaenbs olnla aup
ZIq.aduo'MMM
• saoinaas AHnw woo lo ;uewpedaa lawaeo 86L17-I48-LL£:Xdj
LLL9-Z178-L l£
i' = 09Z9b NI 'sgodeue!pul
peon wegea0 ZL LL
- Via a14 900Z `96 tienaga3
03333
Hc( 7t1,1_12:g
)P°')°
e ► 0009 -
�:
CIT
_JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR FEg �t®
February 10, 2006 06
4 DOGS
7
Mr.David Lach le
Cripe
• 7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis,IN 46250
RE: Crook Property—Development Plan
Dear Mr.Lach:
This project was submitted today for the February 15,2006 Technical Advisory Committee meeting. The
Department of Engineering requests an opportunity to review the PUD ordinance for this before the .
ordinance is adopted to review any changes to existing design standards that will be incorporated in the
zoning ordinance.
This letter shall not be considered a complete primary plat, secondary plat, or construction plan review.
Those reviews will occur at a later date. But since sketch plans for each of the properties were submitted,
the Department of Engineering will take the opportunity to point out Department of Engineering standards
that will need to be incorporated into the primary plats when they are developed. It is our hope that in
doing so,the future review process will be expedited.
1. The Depaitment of Engineering will require detailed information before approving any the
locations of any of the entrances from the perimeter roads. This would require that the drawings
include all of the existing and proposed entrances,driveways,and intersecting roads for a distance
of at least 500 feet in each direction from the proposed entrance. A proposed entrance shall be a
minimum of 500 feet from the adjacent intersections.
• -2. Internal intersections`shall be separated by a minimum of 150 feet. Likewise,the minimum
separation distance between an internal street intersection to an adjacent perimeter street .
intersection shall be 150 feet.
3. The maximum width of an entrance island shall be 10 feet. The maximum width of the drive lane
on each side of an entrance island shall be 18 feet. S
4. Horizontal curve radii shall be a minimum of 150 feet.
5. Interior streets shall intersect at an angle of 75 degrees or greater.
6. The Depaitiuent will request certain improvements and commitments for firture improvements for
each of the frontages of these developments. - -
7. As the drainage design progresses,please provide detention volume for the fully developed site
and for the fully developed thoroughfare plan right-of-way for the perimeter road frontages. This
requirement shall apply regardless of watershed limits. Please provide adequately sized pipes to
carry water from the street to the proposed ponds.
8. For each of the developments, the Department will expect dedication of right-of-way per the
Thoroughfare Plan.
9. Please provide multi-use paths per the Alternative Transportation Plan across each frontage.
10. The Depaituient will expect the primary plat and secondary plat to be developed in accordance
with the drainage review checklist from Crossroad Engineers,PC .
11. The City standard sidewalk is 5 feet in width.
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
ONE,CIVIC SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAx 317.571.2439
EMAIL engineering @ci.carmel.in.us
k
12. Auxiliary lanes are required at each entrance based on the classification of the perimeter roads.
13. A seven-page Plan Certification Form is enclosed with this letter. This form was created with the
desire and intent to streamline the plan review process. We request that you please complete this
form and return it to the Depar tuient of Engineering as soon as possible. Comments will be
generated after the Certification Form is returned.
Comment specific to Crook Property:
1. The 136th Street entrance must be a minimum of 500 feet west of the Village of West Clay
entrance.
2. The Thoroughfare Plan only requires a 45-foot half for 136th Street.
Please do not consider any of the design elements of the civil/site plans approved by the Department of
Engineering based upon your February 10,2006 submittal.
• If you have questions please feel free to call me at 571-2441.
Sincerely,
•
Nicholas J.Redden,P.E.
Plan Review Coordinator •
Department of Engineering
cc: Matt Griffin,Department of Community Services
Greg Hoyes,Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
John South,Hamilton County Soil&Water
Greg Ilko,Crossroad Engineers
•
Engineering Department Review
Project File
S:IPROJREV061 CROOKPROPERTY
•
•
•
NELSON
&
FRANKENBERGER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORA nON
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
JAMES J. NELSON
CHARLES D. FRANKENBERGER
JAMES E. SHINA VER
LAWRENCE 1. KEMPER
JOHNB. FLATI
FREDRIC LAWRENCE
Of Counsel
JANE 8. MERRILL
3021 EAST 98TH STREET
SUITE 220
INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46280
317-844-0106
FAX: 317-846-8782
February 10,2006
Matt Griffin
City of Cannel - Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Cannel, IN 46032
VIA HAND DELIVERY
RE: Indiana Land Development -- Crook
Dear Matt:
Enclosed are 20 informational brochures for the Plan Commission meeting of February
21,2006. As usual, thank you for your cooperation and assistance in this matter, and contact me
with any questions.
Very truly yours,
NELSON & FRANKENBERGER
CL-
Charles D. Frankenberger
CDF/bd
Enclosures
H:\brad\Indiana Land Dev\Crook\Griffm 021 006.doc
tt
~t~~~t\)
\ \) ~t~~
~~~
~~\~
II.
~ '
\;
I _.>_
l~
u
EL
January 4,2006
JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR
/\
~:~-\
f(Cflr'
.eLf,.JQl!"'1
"c.' "' ../t,
JAN (." i,-i.f
1 ij 20[16
DOCS'
Mr. Dennis McGuire
Cripe
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis, IN 46250
".
RE: Crook, Guerrero, and Shelborne Properties-Rezone
Dear Mr. McGuire:
These projects have been submitted for the January 18,2006 Technical Advisory Committee meeting to be
considered for rezone from 8-1 to PUD. The Department of Engineering requests an opportunity to review
the PUD ordinance for each of these before the ordinances are adopted to review any changes to existing
design standards that will be incorporated in the zoning ordinance.
This letter shall not be considered a complete primary plat, secondary plat, or construction plan review.
Those reviews will occur at a later date. But since sketch plans for each of the properties were submitted,
the Department of Engineering will take the opportunity to point out Department of Engineering standards
that will need to be incorporated into the primary plats when they are developed. It is our hope that in
doing so, the future review process will be expedited.
1. The Department of Engineering will require detailed information before approving any the
" locations of any of the entrances from the perimeter roads. This would require"that the drawings
include all of the existing and proposed entrances, driveways, and intersecting roads for a distance
of at least 500 feet in each direction from the proposed entrance. A proposed entrance shall be a
. miilimum of 500 feet from the adjacent intersections." .
2. Intemal intersections shall be separated by ~ minimum of 150 feet.. Likewise, the minimum
separation distance between an internal stre~t intersection to an adjacent perimeter street
intersection shall be 150 feet. I
3. The maximum width of an entrance island shall be 10 feet. The maximum width of the drive lane
on each side of an entrance island shall be 18 feet.
4. Horizontal curve radii shall be a miilimum of 150 feet.
5. Interior streets shall intersect at an angle of75 degrees or greater.
6. The Department will request certain improvements and commitments for future improvements for
each of the frontages of these developments.
7. As the drainage design progresses, please provide detention voltime for the fully developed site
and for the fully developed thoroughfare plan right-of-way for the perimeter road frontages. This
requirement shall apply regardless of watershed limi~s. Please provide adequately sized pipes to
carry water from the street to the proposed ponds.
8. For each of the developments, the Department will expect dedication of right-of-way per the
Thoroughfare Plan.
9. Please provide multi-use paths per the Alternative Transportation Plan across each frontage.
10. The Department will expect the primary plat and secondary plat to be developed in accordance
with the drainage review checklist from Crossroad Engineers, PC.
11. The City standard sidewalk is 5 feet in width.
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CAR'\1EL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAX 317.571.2439
EMAlL engineering@ci.carmel.in.us
,
u
u
\\
12. Auxiliary lanes are required at each entrance based on the classification of the perimeter roads.
Comments specific to Shelbome Property:
1. The distance between the centerlines of Street D and Street E must be a minimum of 150 feet.
2. The primary plat will need to provide a restripmg plan of Shelbome Road at the entrance as a
result of the improvements that will be requested within the Shelbome Road right-of-way.
3. The median island at the entrance may be a maximum width of 10 feet and the overall width of the
entrance may be a maximum width of 46 feet.
4. The intersection of Street "D," Street "C," and the south leg of Street "E" cannot be a "T"
intersection. Please transition Street "D" to Street "C" with a turning roadway and have the south
leg of Street "E" intersect on the curve.
Comment specific to Crook Property:
1. The 136th Street entrance must be a minimum of 500 feet west of the Village of West Clay
entrance.
2. The Thoroughfare Plan only requires a 45- foot half for 136th
Comments specific to Guerrero Property:
1. The entrance on 131 SI Street must be aligned with the Village of West Clay cut on the south side of
131 SI Street and the opposing left turn lanes must be aligned.
2. The Department will request modifications to the existing culverts under 131 sl Street.
3. The primary plat must indicate a continuous 24- foot width of pavement on the north side of 131 sl
Street between the proposed entrance and Towne Road.
4. The primary plat must indicate a continuous 24-foot width of pavement on the west side of Towne
Road between the proposed entrance and 131 sl Street.
5. Locate Street B equidistant between 131 Sl Street and the Street A entrance.
6. Please indicate right-of-way at the southeast comer to accommodate a 120-foot radius roundabout.
The Department will need to confirm that the Towne Road improvements by Brenwick will
maintain the existing centerline of Towne Road. The fmal centerline intersection of Towne Road
and 131s1 Street shall be used as the basis of the roundabout right-of-way.
Please do not consider any of the design elements of the civil/site plans approved by the Department of
Engineering based upon your January 3,2005 submittal.
If you have questionS please feel free to call me at 571-2441.
Gary R. D can, Jr.,
Assistant ity Engineer
Departme t of Engineering
cc: Matt Griffm, Department of Community Services
Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office
John South, Hamilton County Soil & Water
Greg Ilko, Crossroad Engineers
Engineering Department Review
Project File
..,El11 Hl/2006 11: 51
3177769628
U
HAMIL TON CO SURVEVOR
U
PAGE 05/06
...
::Kenton C. 'T.t'ard.. Sun/t!}/or
<J'ftll1u' (;17' 776-<(4.~5
'Tllx (Ui) 77L;~62S
SlIt1t rU
Onr :}famil/oll Cml7lty .~I,"arr
)I(o"'e.'I.'Ille, Indiana 4GM;/',.1.1.,()
January 10,2006
Paul I. Cripe, Inc.
A1TN: Cbris Wiseman
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis, IN 46250
VIA FACSIMILE: 841-4798
Re: Crook Property
--- --
..,P"', . '--.....
. ,
',""
k" ". .".
I.> ",>('" "\ \
~\,\\",..)~ \ \
,r-:~('~(}.>',~ '\ ')
'.,,~;,:,;I";-' ~ ;'.'\}: \
. )/
--//
\"'~//
~--- --
,
,
/ J
\
\
\
\
Dear Mr. Wiseman:
We have reviewed the concept plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office on
January 3, 2006, for this project and have the following comments:
1. The proposed project falls in the iJU:orporated area of the City of Cannel
2. The proposed project DOBS NOT fall in a Carmel Wellhead Protection Zone.
3. The proposed project falls in the Stultz and Almond and the Elliott Creek
Regulated Drain WBtenheds.
4. This proposed development will be a Hamilton County Regulated Drain
Subdivision.
5. Please note this site will be required to comply with the new Hamilton County
Stormwater Management Technical Standards Manual. and any additional
requirements of the City of Cannel Manual.
6. The Hamilton County Surveyor's Office recommends the street trees be plaoecl
behind the sidewalk because of the root infiltration into the reguJated SSD under
the curbs.
.01/10/2086 11:51
3177769628
U
HAMILTON CO SURVEynR
U
.,
7. Please submit complete construction p1aDs, the secondary plat, and drainage
oalculations to this office when they become available.
8. The Hamilton County Surveyorts Office has no objections to the rezone.
9. Please note that fbrther conunents may be necessary at a later date.
Should )'Ou have any questions, I can be reached at 317-776-8495.
Sincerely,
a~
Plan Reviewer
CC: Matt Grif1ln - Carmel DOCD
10hn South - HCSWCD
AmBllda Foley - Cannel Engineering
Diok HilI- Carmel Engineering
Mike McBride - HCHD
Indiana Land Development - 41 S-0466
PAGE 86/06
{'Or _.~
w
o
Carmel TAC Agenda
CTRWD Comments
Orin Jessup Land Co, Sec 1,Iots 140-142 pt - Mr. Window
Docket No. 05120024 UV Chapter 9.01 Permitted Uses
Ii' e e showin revi w rates for the change in use.
9:00 a.m.
9:10 a.m. Docket No. 06010006 SP: Windsor Grove II
***CTRWD application and construction plans have been received and are currently under review.
9:20 a.m. Docket No. 05120010 SP: Abney Glen
****CTRWD application is needed. Construction plans were received and are currently under review.
9:J5 a.m. Docket No. 06010005 Z: Shelborne Property PUD
****Within CTRWD service area.
9:50 a.m. Docket No. 06010003 Z: Guerrero Property PUD
****Within CTRWD service area.
10:05 a.m. Docket No. 06010009 Z: Crook PUD
****Within CTRWD service area.
10:20 a.m. Docket No. 06010002 Z: Old Meridian Place Rezone
****Project is outside ofCTRWD service area.
10'JO a m. Docket No. 06010008 Z: Midtown Village PUD
****Project is outside ofCTRWD service area.
10:45 a.m. Docket No: 05120025 Z 126tb & Keystone/Gramercy PUD
****Project is outside of CTRWD service area.
11 :00 a m. Docket No. 05120026 Z and 05120027 DP/ADLS: Village Green PUD
****Project is outside ofCTRWD service area.
11'15 a.m Docket No. 06010007 DP/ADLS: Gateway Pavilion
****Within CTRWD service area. Plans and CTRWD application will be needed.
11 :JO a.m. Docket No. 06010010 SP: Village of Westclay Section 150001
****CTRWD application is needed. Construction plans were received and are currently under review.
11 :40 a.m. Docket No. 06010001 Z: Monon Townes PUD
****Project is outside ofCTRWD service area.
11 :55 a.m. Docket No. 06010011 ADLS Amend: Conseco Parking Lot
****Project does not affect the sanitary sewers. No action needed.
7172 Graham Road
Indianapolis, IN 46250
317 -842-6777
FAX: 317-841-4798
www.cripe.biz
Architecture
Construction
Administration
Engineering
· Geographic
Information
Services
Landscape
Architecture
Land Planning
Land Surveying
Real Estate
Consulting
Transportation
Engineering
December 30, 2005
~~T-~'
..:/~\\~:"'~
(/,-. '., I . ,','\
/ I, ,. ",
f '."'" \ \
I. ,," ' .:.., \ \
l ., .' ., \ 'J
\,\ :,~" " I~'J-
\ . .., '- - -.
\ \ ," '"
\ \ '. ,.' ,:,:;
\")1'
'. . ....... :?'--', . ;',
~..... '0 . '~'
"'<~0." :~\ \.7
~~
Crook Property - Indiana Land Development
Dear T AC Member:
Indiana Land Development Corporation is scheduled to appear before TAC on
January 18, 2006 for the purpose of rezoning of approximately 20.37 acres located
on the north side of 136th Street east of Towne Road for the purpose of developing a
single-family residential development with approximately 40 homes to be located
within the development. We are requesting a re-zone from S-1 to a PUD. I have
enclosed a drawing of the planned development along with street details for your
review.
Chris Wiseman of Paul I. Cripe, Inc., Charles D. Frankenberger of Nelson &
Frankenberger, along with Paul Shoopman of Indiana Land Development
Corporation will be attending the T AC meeting.
Should you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call Dennis
McGuire at Paull. Cripe, Inc. at 317-842-6777.
\,
T'
'... :\\
~ .:...
David C. Martin, CRS, GRI
Vice President, Residential Division
F. C. Tucker Company, Inc.
9279 North Meridian Street, Suite 102
Indianapolis, IN 46260
E-mail: dmartin@mibor.net
DirectlVM: 317-580-7898, FAX: 317-843-7767
DC:
a 9/0 ,,:J.D- ~9- . III/oS-
Comparative Market Analysis ~ y . .
Re'J CroolL. Put) 8. dOO 4 +
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DaM
Opt MU SF
1 2561913 2/09/2006 2227 2910 3 3/1 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 2 1L Y 2005 2085 2638 $629,900* $600,000 $227 110
Shaftesbury
RD
2 2501723 3/28/2005 14563 2910 3 3/1 BALLANTRAE 2CATC 2 1L Y 2004 2582 2582 $550,000 $542,500 $210 50
BALLANTRAE
CI
3 2514176 9/16/2005 2001 Stanhope 2910 3 3/0 Village of 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1335 2668 $539,900* $589,110 $221 126
4 2506792 7/25/2005 13963 Washita 2910 4 4/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1770 3202 $469,900* $462,000 $144 108
Ct
5 2573857 2/21/2006 6045 Tanana 2910 4 3/1 Cherry Cree FINGR 1 2L Y 2005 1770 3202 $458,080* $440,630 $138 38
DR
6 2534619 5/27/2005 13950 2910 4 3/1 CHERRY 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1770 3202 $453,600 $453,600 $142 0
WASHITA CT CREE
7 2571619 2/28/2006 6059 Tanana 2910 4 3/2 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1682 3203 $436,650* $416,150 $130 87
8 2507800 4/15/2005 3063 Wildman 2910 4 2/1 HAYDEN RUN 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1202 3188 $429,195* $391,295 $123 35
Ln LN
9 2509947 2/23/2005 13494 Belford 2910 3 2/1 Ashbury Par 2CATC 0 2L Y 2005 1000 2575 $415,000 $415,000 $161 0
Court CT
10 2552566 12/07/2005 6086 Osage 2910 4 3/2 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1682 3203 $412,300 $377,300 $118 83
DR
11 2537511 5/31/2005 13760 Four 2910 5 3/0 Lakeside Pa 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1280 2940 $403,373 $403,373 $137 182
Seasons Way
12 2540226 10/30/2005 12915 REEDY 2910 4 2/1 HAYDEN RUN 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1238 3302 $400,000* $381,860 $116 53
CT
13 2463358 5/20/2005 2720 2910 4 3/1 Lakeside Pa 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1134 3200 $399,900* $390,000 $122 151
Heathermoor
Park DR
14 2564048 10/14/2005 6054 Tanana 2910 4 2/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $399,865 $399,865 $142 0
DR
15 2465607 2/22/2005 13996 . 2910 4 2/1 SETTLER'S R 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 964 2902 $397,015 $365,000 $126 29
SETTLER'S
RIDGE TR
16 2500791 2/25/2005 5929 Tanana 2910 4 2/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $395,840 $385,765 $137 35
DR
17 2540670 12/28/2005 3066 WILDMAN 2910 4 2/1 HAYDEN RUN 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1238 3302 $390,000* $369,745 $112 143
LN
18 2540914 8/04/2005 5973 Osage 2910 4 2/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $389,900 $373,900 $133 19
DR
19 2509959 6/16/2005 13736 Four 2910 4 2/1 Lakeside Pa 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1067 3032 $389,900 $389,900 $129 81
Season's WA
20 2543379 6/28/2005 13914 2910 4 2/1 SETTLERS RI 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1238 0 $385,490 $385,490 $0 25
SETTLERS
RIDGE TR
21 2509953 3/11/2005 13506 Belford 2910 3 3/0 Ashbury Par 2CATC 1 1H N 2005 0 3236 $385,000 $385,000 $119 0
Court CT
22 2556178 12/2212005 12670 Tram LN 2910 4 2/1 Wexley Chas 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $381,150 $345,052 $122 90
23 2468629 3/30/2005 2752 2910 3 2/1 Lakeside Pa 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1241 2840 $379,900* $373,000 $131 98
Heathermoor
Park DR
24 2526668 8/15/2005 13955 Settlers 2910 4 3/0 Settlers Ri 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1788 3302 $379,900* $370,000 $112 65
Ridge TR
25 2503329 8/23/2005 14028 2910 4 2/1 SETTLERS RI 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1643 3188 $379,000* $350,000 $110 175
SOURWOOD
LN
26 2534768 12/02/2005 14094 2910 4 3/0 SETTLERS RI 2CATC 1 1H Y 2004 1287 2845 $375,000* $374,535 $132 147
PLANTATION
WOOD
Comparative Market Analysis
Properly Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Properly
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
27 2556156 11/17/2005 13420 Penniger 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1738 3342 $374,770* $374,455 $112 25
DR
28 2566952 10/14/2005 3667 Dolan 2910 4 2/1 CLAYBOURNE 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1587 3174 $365,875 $365,875 $115 30
Way
29 2557292 11/30/2005 14030 Powder 2910 3 2/0 Cherry Cree 2CATC 1 1L Y 2005 2621 2621 $364,345* $330,345 $126 15
DR
30 2411844 5/20/2005 14021 Quarter 2910 3 2/0 Westwood Es 3CATC 1 1L N 2004 0 2179 $362,000 $350,000 $161 433
Horse Court
CT
31 2452763 1/28/2005 2847 Windy 2910 4 2/1 Lakeside Pa 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1067 3032 $359,900 $345,000 $114 120
Knoll LN
32 2605817 1/20/2006 710 Edison 2910 2 2/0 Ashbury Par 2CATC 1 1L N 2005 0 3001 $359,840 $359,840 $120 0
WA
33 2530798 3/30/2005 13178 2910 4 2/1 CLAYBOURNE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2000 3220 $358,250 $358,250 $111 14
CARVER CT
34 2526517 12/28/2005 14017 2910 4 2/1 SETTLERS RI 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1566 3196 $350,000* $329,495 $103 196
SOURWOOD
LN
35 2575822 3/10/2006 13937 Settlers 2910 4 2/1 Settlers Ri 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1566 3196 $347,900* $270,000 $84 49
Ridge
36 2501294 2/25/2005 14349 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $344,155 $326,655 $116 22
Whisper DR
37 2543394 10/27/2005 14395 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CA TC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $343,790 $351,700 $125 10
Whisper DR
38 2524639 3/30/2005 14348 2910 5 3/1 SADDLE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 390 1842 $341,200 $341,200 $185 8
CHARIOTS CREE
WHISPER
39 2545677 11/18/2005 13667 2910 4 2/1 Lakeside Pa 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1396 3175 $339,900* $339,900 $107 82
Amblewind PL
40 2551036 11/22/2005 14018 Powder 2910 3 2/0 cherry cree 3CATC 1 1L Y 2005 2650 2650 $339,900 $328,250 $124 58
Dr DR
41 2503015 6/29/2005 13346 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1309 2837 $332,795* $307,000 $108 147
Salamone WA
42 2567790 11/03/2005 2025 Stanhope 2910 3 2/0 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 1 1L Y 2005 938 1781 $332,536 $383,464 $215 0
St
43 2510764 7/18/2005 14275 2910 4 2/1 SADDLE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1402 2819 $330,000* $312,000 $111 93
CHARIOTS CREE
WHISPER DR
44 2557469 11/21/2005 13683 2910 3 2/1 Lakeside Pa 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1241 2676 $329,900* $323,000 $121 43
Amblewind PL
45 2541028 10/10/2005 14050 Platte 2910 2 2/0 Cherry Cree 2CATC 1 1L Y 2004 1704 2036 $329,900* $320,000 $157 83
DR
46 2550077 10/13/2005 14401 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $327,420 $296,455 $106 17
Whisper DR
47 2555534 11/30/2005 14421 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $324,875 $295,000 $105 53
Whisper DR
48 2501318 3/30/2005 14348 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $324,500 $341 ,200 $122 3
Whisper DR
49 2530150 9/01/2005 4030 Rowlett 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 751 2971 $324,260* $301,950 $102 87
PL
50 2538895 11/14/2005 4043 Dolan 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1170 2630 $322,225* $304,180 $116 102
WA
51 2538019 10/14/2005 14377 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1160 2502 $321,685 $294,120 $118 81
Whisper DR
52 2518027 5/13/2005 14361 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $321,685 $322,925 $129 2
Whisper DR
Infonnation deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
Comparative Market Analysis
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
53 2551930 11/17/2005 14384 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1160 2502 $320,145 $290,145 $116 57
Whisper DR
54 2604993 3/27/2006 13990 Platte 2910 2 2/0 Cherry Cree 2CATC 1 1L Y 2004 1637 1937 $319,990 $315,000 $163 25
DR
55 2434299 1/28/2005 13465 2910 4 3/1 Lakes at Ha 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1664 3229 $319,900 $301,760 $93 158
Lablanca Bend
56 2559127 10/21/2005 14371 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1160 2502 $319,730 $289,730 $116 17
Whisper DR
57 2527079 8/15/2005 14396 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $319,375 $304,625 $109 18
Whisper
58 2570088 1/30/2006 14445 Chariot's 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $318,605 $293,605 $117 53
Whisper DR
59 2534894 9/20/2005 14378 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $318,215 $305,840 $122 22
Whisper DR
60 2563964 2/27/2006 14439 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $316,680 $284,920 $114 73
Whisper DR
61 2530163 8/11/2005 3992 Rowlett 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 894 2803 $315,830 $290,000 $103 74
PL
62 2519593 6/29/2005 14372 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $313,345 $295,000 $118 42
Whisper DR
63 2514636 5/25/2005 13268 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1100 2512 $313,090 $317,530 $126 12
Amundson DR
64 2568595 1/27/2006 14450 Chariot's 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2555 $310,285 $278,680 $109 5
Whispher DR
65 2567947 11/04/2005 14408 Chariots 2910 3 2/1 SADDLE 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 900 2722 $310,000 $309,930 $114 0
Whisper Dr CREE
66 2536711 9/13/2005 13856 OLIVER 2910 4 2/1 THE RIDGE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1448 2666 $310,000* $279,725 $105 67
LN A
67 2550470 12/16/2005 14420 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1153 2360 $308,665 $280,790 $119 84
Whisper DR
68 2574067 1/31/2006 14451 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1153 2360 $305,855 $276,000 $117 14
Whisper DR
69 2530395 5/12/2005 13861 Oliver 2910 4 2/1 Ridge at Ha 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1766 3532 $303,770 $303,770 $86 0
LN
70 2462147 2/25/2005 14342 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1153 2360 $296,760* $286,760 $122 77
Whisper
71 2570006 2/27/2006 14438 Chariot's 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1153 2360 $295,390 $264,965 $112 66
Whisper DR
72 2565464 12/16/2005 14444 Chariot's 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 978 2499 $284,305 $258,305 $103 14
Whisper DR
73 2544174 9/28/2005 14360 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 983 2190 $279,990 $263,490 $120 11
Whisper DR
74 2466920 11/22/2005 13466 2910 4 2/1 LAKES AT 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1306 2556 $279,900* $240,000 $94 217
LABLANCA HA
BEND
75 2516230 10/26/2005 2738 Barbano 2910 4 3/0 The Lakes a 2CATC 1 2L N 2004 0 3004 $269,900* $265,000 $88 73
Ct
76 2503508 9/27/2005 13970 OLIVER 2910 4 2/1 THE RIDGE 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1100 2316 $265,000* $248,355 $107 222
LN A
77 2550891 9/13/2005 13777 Stanford 2910 4 2/1 Stanford Pa 2CATC 1 2L N 2005 0 2629 $242,155 $235,155 $89 12
DR
78 2604358 3/14/2006 9643 Cypress 2910 4 2/1 SHELBORNE 3CATC 1 2L N 2004 0 2360 $229,900 $215,500 $91 33
WA G
Min 2 2004 390 1,781 $229,900 $215,500 $84 2
Max 5 2005 2,650 3,532 $629,900 $600,000 $227 433
Average 4 2005 1390 2769 $354,950 $340,986 $124 74
Number of Properties: 78
.. Average ( SalePrice / SqFt MU ) = $124
:;, -.
Infonnation deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Prepared by
David Martin
317-843-7766
F. C. Tucker Company
dmartin@mibor.net
Your initial search criteria were: ((L1STSTATUS='CLOSD' AND (CLOSEDDATE>=CONVERT(DATETIME,'01l01/200S')))) AND (( AREA IN (2910) ) )
AND (RESCONDO LIKE '%RES%') AND (ACRES>=.20 AND ACRES<=.29) AND (YEARBUIL T>=2004)
J<1 J 0
Comparative Market Analysis
/
30 - ; ?; c;
..
Y6 '~oo1~
DC: - ill -
AM'~ 06
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SPI DOM
Opt MU SF
1 2566653 .2/18/2006 12240 2910 4 5/0 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 2357 4361 $1,225,000 $1,225,000 $281 92
Montcalm St
ST
2 2552574 2/14/2006 3762 E PETE 2910 5 5/2 BRIDGEWATER 4CATC 3 2L Y 2005 1725 4758 $1,075,900 $1,075,900 $226 127
DYE BLVD
3 2545521 11/09/2005 2241 Finchley 2910 5 5/2 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2915 4912 $995,000 $995,000 $203 61
RD
4 2439613 8/25/2005 2151 Finchley 2910 5 6/1 Village of 3CATC 4 2L Y 2005 2865 4378 $969,900* $969,900 $222 387
RD
5 2533725 7/29/2005 13111 Brooks 2910 5 6/2 BROOKS LAND 3CATC 3 2L Y 2004 3294 5596 $960,000 $955,000 $171 13
Landing PL
6 2509274 9/01/2005 381 Sanner 2910 4 3/2 Reserve At 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 3329 3329 $949,900* $929,600 $279 154
CT
7 2508774 5/13/2005 12500 2910 5 4/1 Village of 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2015 5364 $879,900 $875,000 $163 21
Bellingrath
8 2517459 8/12/2005 12488 2910 4 4/1 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2622 4855 $849,000* $846,215 $174 116
Bellingrath ST
9 2532609 12/19/2005 12473 Meeting 2910 5 4/1 Village of 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 2204 4140 $845,000* $820,000 $198 176
House RD
10 2457157 5/05/2005 12431 N 2910 5 4/2 Village of 4CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1905 4483 $835,000* $827,500 $185 185
Bellingrath ST
11 2567193 1/05/2006 2183 Finchley 2910 5 4/1 Village of 3CATC 3 2L Y 2004 1975 4175 $794,900 $765,000 $183 16
RD
12 2452738 6/03/2005 12190 Hoover 2910 5 4/2 Village of 4CATC 3 2L Y 2004 2365 4586 $774,900 $750,000 $164 204
RD
13 2505057 4/28/2005 12479 2910 4 4/1 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1993 4695 $769,900 $761,050 $162 14
Bellingrath ST
14 2466140 3/11/2005 13103 Brooks 2910 4 4/1 BROOKS LAND 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 2000 3159 $719,777 $700,000 $222 82
Landing
15 2527131 11/18/2005 2004 Mowbray 2910 5 4/1 Village of 3CATC 3 2L Y 2004 1602 4050 $699,000* $666,000 $164 180
ST
16 2559834 1/06/2006 11950 N 2910 5 5/2 BRIGHTON WO 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1500 4166 $689,900 $689,900 $166 80
EASTWICK
CIRCLE
17 2462614 9/23/2005 1955 2910 5 4/1 VILLAGE OF 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1445 3899 $684,900* $670,000 $172 321
TROWBRIDGE
HIGH ST
18 2517405 12/08/2005 11962 N 2910 4 4/2 BRIGHTON WO 3CDTC 2 2L Y 2005 1400 4207 $674,900* $674,900 $160 154
EASTWICK CI
19 2602795 12/23/2005 14341 Laura 2910 3 3/0 Laura Vista 3CATC 2 1L Y 2005 1276 2600 $655,900 $655,900 $252 0
Vista DR
20 2552419 12/16/2005 11895 N 2910 4 4/2 BRIGHTON WO 3CDTC 1 2L Y 2005 1450 3325 $639,900 $639,900 $192 107
DUBARRY
DR
21 2452394 5/11/2005 11991 NE 2910 4 4/2 BRIGHTON WO 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1190 3686 $639,900 $639,900 $174 215
DUBARRY
DR
22 2466622 5/25/2005 2557 Turning 2910 4 3/1 CAMDEN WALK 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 2697 3714 $639,900* $620,000 $167 143
Leaf LN
23 2571169 3/03/2006 1840 2910 4 4/1 HIGH GROVE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1898 3499 $629,900* $620,000 $177 50
BRAEBURN
DR
24 2462564 1/3112005 1883 2910 4 3/1 HIGH GROVE 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1356 3744 $614,900 $617,000 $165 62
WINESAP WA
25 2501814 3/21/2005 12437 Meeting 2910 5 4/1 Village of 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 915 3385 $599,900 $593,000 $175 23
House RD
26 2572745 3/20/2006 2494 Silver 2910 3 3/2 Camden Walk 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1704 3351 $599,900 $555,000 $166 61
Oaks
Comparative Market Analysis
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
27 2514800 10/13/2005 2432 Turning Leaf 2910 3 2/2 Camden 3CATC 1 1L Y 2004 2000 3084 $595,500 $575,000 $186 185
LN Walk
28 2438561 3/09/2005 2535 Dawn Ridge 2910 4 3/1 Lakeside 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 2985 4095 $519,900* $630,000 $154 211
DR Pa
29 2575151 12/19/2005 13462 Spotswood 2910 4 4/1 VILLAGE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1800 3300 $518,245 $518,245 $157 17
OF
30 2576441 12/28/2005 1877 Halifax 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 1956 3510 $496,225 $496,225 $141 63
31 2504995 7/29/2005 2474 Heathermoor 2910 5 3/1 Lakeside 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1830 4220 $495,900 $510,818 $121 196
Ma
32 2531540 11/03/2005 1853 E Halifax ST 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1800 3263 $486,670 $522,845 $160 80
33 2505436 6/25/2005 1755 Fairmount 2910 4 3/1 Manors at 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1650 3093 $480,415* $480,415 $155 105
ST W
34 2509951 5/13/2005 3802 Castle Rock 2910 4 2/1 Long SIDEL 1 2L Y 2004 1770 3202 $469,990* $425,000 $133 56
DR Branch
35 2522659 5/31/2005 1019 Larkspur CI 2910 4 3/1 Cricket Kno 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1350 3321 $469,900 $440,000 $132 32
36 2468532 3/30/2005 2558 Dawn Ridge 2910 4 3/1 Lakeside 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1594 4150 $469,900* $437,637 $105 99
DR Pa
37 2559387 2/09/2006 2617 Heathermoor 2910 4 3/1 Lakeside 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2340 3720 $449,900* $430,605 $116 107
Park Dr. South Pa
38 2468512 4/04/2005 2534 Dawn Ridge 2910 3 3/1 Lakeside 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1858 3634 $444,900* $415,000 $114 99
DR Pa
39 2445115 3/15/2005 13381 Bellshire 2910 4 3/1 Shelborne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1854 3688 $439,900* $439,900 $119 194
LN P
40 2528242 9/23/2005 5966 Tanana DR 2910 4 2/1 Cherry 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $429,990* $423,265 $150 107
Cree
41 2559297 12/29/2005 13387 Beckwith 2910 4 3/1 Shelborne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1996 4150 $429,900* $464,103 $112 21
DR P
42 2552564 11/30/2005 6030 Osage DR 2910 4 3/2 Cherry 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1682 3203 $428,050 $403,050 $126 47
Cree
43 2450250 2/10/2005 13890 Wildcat DR 2910 4 3/2 Cherry 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1682 3203 $415,260 $398,810 $125 134
Cree
44 2541818 5/26/2005 3743 Earhart DR 2910 4 4/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1500 3220 $412,000 $412,000 $128 2
45 2508206 3/31/2005 13409 Bellshire 2910 4 2/1 Shelborne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1394 3032 $399,900 $415,520 $137 14
LN P
46 2508358 3/31/2005 6017 2910 4 3/1 Lakes at 3CA TC 1 2L y 2004 1312 2935 $399,900 $385,800 $131 14
Summerbrook CT Ha
47 2559408 11/15/2005 6060 Clearview 2910 3 2/1 Lakes at 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1858 3633 $399,900* $393,600 $108 23
DR Ha
48 2601517 2/28/2006 13410 Bellshire 2910 4 3/1 Shelborne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1606 3049 $399,900 $390,000 $128 12
LN P
49 2449055 1/19/2005 12085 Auburn 2910 4 2/1 Long 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1491 2800 $399,275 $374,275 $134 67
Creek Crossing Branch
50 2503343 3/10/2005 3138 WILDMAN 2910 4 3/0 HAYDEN 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1788 3302 $394,950* $374,730 $113 20
LN RUN
51 2519612 9/01/2005 3429 NE Wexley 2910 4 3/2 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1682 3203 $390,850 $382,550 $119 68
CT Chas
52 2570115 12/22/2005 13921 Washita 2910 4 2/1 Cherry 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $389,990* $360,715 $128 18
CT Cree
Information deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Comparative Market Analysis
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
53 2572854 2/09/2006 3353 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $387,315 $372,315 $132 42
CI Chas
54 2554329 1/12/2006 3377 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $384,885 $364,885 $129 107
CI Chas
55 2515266 5/19/2005 3344 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $380,655 $359,000 $127 24
CI Chas
56 2559390 11/30/2005 13380 Bellshire 2910 4 2/1 Shelborne P 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1173 3032 $379,900* $374,020 $123 5
LN
57 2509954 5/26/2005 3817 Castle 2910 4 2/1 Long 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1402 2819 $378,655* $355,000 $126 71
Rock DR Branch
58 2530687 9/19/2005 3437 Wexley 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $377,410 $352,410 $125 89
CT Chas
59 2571963 12/29/2005 3369 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1402 2819 $376,950 $356,000 $126 1
CI Chas
60 2462119 5/19/2005 3392 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1402 2819 $376,075* $301,075 $107 149
CI Chas
61 2556166 10/14/2005 3329 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $372,165 $372,165 $133 10
CI Chas
62 2507427 5/26/2005 3841 Castle 2910 4 2/1 Long 3CATC 3 2L Y 2005 1491 2800 $368,600* $353,000 $126 85
Rock DR Branch
63 2562061 11/17/2005 3749 Dolan WA 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1738 3342 $368,015* $353,515 $106 32
64 2530023 3/23/2006 13175 Carver 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2006 1309 2777 $367,995* $335,000 $121 265
CT
65 2544403 11/15/2005 3345 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $366,815 $346,000 $123 77
CI Chas
66 2462090 5/19/2005 3384 Kilkenny 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CDTC 1 2L Y 2004 1363 2804 $362,855 $355,575 $127 155
CI Chas
67 2516058 5/19/2005 3421 Wexley 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $360,490 $361,115 $129 11
CT Chas
68 2559381 12/16/2005 13394 Bellshire 2910 4 2/1 Shelborne P 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1134 3120 $359,900* $357,400 $115 20
LN
69 2463883 3/31/2005 3776 Kegler 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1730 3282 $358,555* $335,000 $102 103
WA
70 2569052 2/27/2006 12647 Tuscany 2910 4 2/1 Wexley 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1363 2804 $356,320 $338,320 $121 75
BL Chas
71 2558534 9/14/2005 5700 Fairbourne 2910 4 2/1 The Lakes a 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1173 3032 $352,325 $352,325 $116 0
Ct
72 2526760 7/29/2005 3890 Kegler 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1594 3350 $349,995* $355,080 $106 25
WA
73 2468432 6/02/2005 13229 Carver 2910 4 3/1 Claybourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1600 3320 $349,995* $345,500 $104 130
CT
74 2501297 2/04/2005 13220 2910 4 2/3 claybourne 3CA TC 1 2L Y 2004 1600 3320 $334,900 $333,900 $101 6
Amundson
75 2501305 4/15/2005 14355 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1372 2499 $320,060* $315,000 $126 77
Whisper DR Cree
76 2512825 9/28/2005 13516 Lablanca 2910 4 2/1 Lakes at Ha 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1567 2694 $319,900* $315,000 $117 173
Bend
77 2503452 2/21/2005 13913 OLIVER 2910 4 2/1 RIDGE AT 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1388 2590 $313,795* $288,875 $112 9
LN HA
78 2465887 5/09/2005 14300 Chariots 2910 4 2/1 Saddle 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 715 2804 $310,585* $283,485 $101 93
Whisper Cree
Infonnation deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Comparative Market Analysis
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
SUbject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
79 2441671 5/10/2005 3650 2910 4 2/1 Claybourne 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1100 2507 $308,300* $292,280 $117 248
Earhart DR
80 2506021 4/29/2005 14288 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1153 2360 $299,705 $271,708 $115 67
Chariots
Whisper
81 2503526 4/27/2005 13955 2910 4 2/1 THE RIDGE A 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1100 2401 $299,500* $270,000 $112 81
OLIVER
LN
82 2506091 3/24/2005 14121 2910 4 2/1 Saddle Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1153 2360 $297,985* $279,285 $118 31
Equine CT
83 2545205 6/28/2005 13947 2910 4 2/1 RIDGE AT HA 2CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1388 2546 $297,800 $297,800 $117 0
Primo Way
84 2503518 2/25/2005 13460 2910 4 2/1 THE LAKES A 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1348 2401 $294,850* $275,000 $115 38
LORENZO
BL
85 2503485 9/15/2005 13929 2910 4 2/1 THE RIDGE A 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1080 2118 $285,000* $270,000 $127 212
OLIVER
LN
86 2512433 5/27/2005 13219 2910 4 2/1 Lakes at Ha 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 880 3233 $284,900* $282,750 $87 62
Roma Bend
87 2503496 6/29/2005 13936 2910 4 2/1 THE RIDGE A 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1766 2651 $274,990* $274,990 $104 124
OLIVER
LN
88 2466580 1/31/2005 13515 2910 4 2/1 Lakes at Ha 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1509 3233 $274,900* $281,030 $87 11
Lorenzo
BL
89 2465688 4/07/2005 13209 2910 4 2/1 LAKES@HAYDE 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1149 2187 $272,500* $258,500 $118 99
Camillo CT
90 2467422 8/01/2005 13493 2910 4 2/1 LAKESATHA 3CATC 1 2L N 2004 o . 3233 $259,900* $230,900 $71 183
LORENZO
BL
91 2503045 5/09/2005 3957 2910 3 2/1 Claybourne 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1028 2028 $244,710* $249,425 $123 70
Rowlett PL
Min 3 2004 715 2,028 $244,710 $230,900 $71 1
Max 5 2006 3,329 5,596 $1,225,000 $1,225,000 $281 387
Average 4 2005 1649 3330 $495,278 $484,630 $142 92
Number of Properties: 91
Average ( SalePrice / SqFt MU ) = $142
Information deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Prepared by
David Martin
317-843-7766
F. C. Tucker Company
dmartin@mibor.net
Your initial search criteria were: ((L1STSTATUS='CLOSD' AND (CLOSEDDATE>=CONVERT(DATETIME,'01/01/2005')))) AND (( AREA IN (2910) ) )
AND (RESCONDO LIKE '%RES%') AND (ACRES>=.30 AND ACRES<=.39) AND (YEARBUIL T>=2004)
Comparative Market Analysis
if- 5"
... 11
DC: /1/ /05 of- '18:~oo1f
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DaM
Opt MU SF
1 2458721 6/27/2005 514 Bolderwood 2910 5 5/1 Woods 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 3075 5085 $985,910* $985,910 $194 190
LN
2 2508253 6/01/2005 13793 Foxdale 2910 5 4/2 Woods @ Wil 4CATC 2 2L Y 2005 2228 4773 $899,900 $895,000 $188 44
Lake
3 2501127 7/01/2005 1867 E Blore 2910 4 5/2 Village of 4CATC 3 2L Y 2005 2056 4238 $869,900* $913,613 $216 79
Heath
4 2504431 6/03/2005 13776 N 2910 5 5/2 WOODS AT 4CATC 3 2L Y 2005 1700 4445 $869,900 $869,900 $196 83
COLDWATER WI
LN
5 2459042 4/29/2005 1861 E BLORE 2910 5 4/3 VILLAGE OF 4CATC 2 2L Y 2005 1675 4305 $849,900 $849,900 $197 154
HEATH WA
6 2500966 3/23/2005 2422 2910 5 5/2 Windsor Gro 4CATC 3 2L Y 2004 2287 4656 $799,900 $763,412 $164 33
Londonberry
BL
7 2435448 2/18/2005 10738 2910 5 4/1 ENGLISH 4CATC 4 2L Y 2004 2120 4414 $739,900* $797,500 $181 148
STRATTON CI OAK
8 2565137 12/30/2005 4019 Tolbert 2910 5 4/1 Shelbourne 3CA TC 2 2L Y 2005 1893 3838 $725,000* $714,500 $186 12
PL
9 2469669 12/22/2005 3563 Corsham 2910 4 5/2 English Oak 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1425 4734 $685,000 $640,000 $135 339
CI
10 2576379 1/18/2006 4039 Burford 2910 5 4/1 Shelbourne 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 1893 3838 $665,000 $645,000 $168 10
DR
11 2517904 1/30/2006 14055 2910 5 4/1 CHESWICK 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 2644 3905 $664,900* $630,000 $161 302
Cheswick BL
12 2435815 10/27/2005 3594 Corsham 2910 4 4/1 English Oak 3CA TC 2 2L Y 2004 1082 4292 $649,900* $623,500 $145 473
CI
13 2455794 2/09/2005 13842 Broad 2910 5 5/0 CHESWlCK 4CATC 1 2L Y 2004 2278 4490 $639,900 $620,000 $138 102
Meadow ST
14 2505618 2/1112005 3589 Callowell 2910 6 5/0 English Oak 3CATC 3 2L Y 2004 1083 4108 $639,900* $625,149 $152 2
DR
15 2514220 10/07/2005 1008 Pine Hill 2910 5 5/0 Cheswick PI 4CATC 1 2L Y 2004 2314 4742 $639,900* $627,900 $132 171
WA
16 2561437 10/04/2005 1826 Halifax 2910 4 4/2 THE MANORS 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $630,635 $630,635 $171 0
17 2613128 2/27/2006 2589 FAUST 2910 4 3/0 LAURA VISTA 3CATC 2 1L Y 2006 1600 2600 $629,700 $629,700 $242 0
COURT
18 2521750 12/30/2005 12938 Pontell 2910 4 4/2 Shelbourne 3CA TC 2 2L Y 2005 1740 3701 $619,900* $601,900 $163 249
PL
19 2517611 12/02/2005 12996 2910 4 5/0 SHELBOURNE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2025 4186 $614,900* $582,000 $139 221
Thurmond WA
20 2535555 7/20/2005 4053 Burford 2910 5 5/0 Shelbourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1687 3662 $599,900 $560,000 $153 7
CT
21 2468347 5/24/2005 12947 Pontell 2910 5 4/1 Shelbourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1860 3210 $599,900* $585,000 $182 131
PL
22 2450594 1/24/2005 12975 Pontell 2910 4 5/0 Shelbourne 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1963 3847 $599,900* $585,500 $152 117
Place
23 2568645 1/20/2006 12952 2910 5 4/1 SHELBOURNE 4CATC 2 2L Y 2005 1669 3797 $599,900 $580,000 $153 28
AIRHART BL
24 2556267 11/21/2005 13314 Berwick 2910 5 3/2 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $599,640* $599,640 $162 22
LN
25 2506738 7/11/2005 13309 Stagg 2910 5 4/1 Delaware Tr 4CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1642 3836 $598,500 $580,000 $151 55
Hill
26 2505911 7/29/2005 13226 2910 4 3/1 Manors at W 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2380 3756 $586,020* $598,095 $159 79
Dumbarton ST
Infonnation deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Comparative Market Analysis
Property Type: Residential/Condo Status: Sold
Subject
Property
# ML# Closed Address Area Bd Ba Legal Gar FP Lv Bas YB Sq Ft Sq Ft LP SP SP/ DOM
Opt MU SF
27 2516889 7/28/2005 13352 2910 5 4/2 DELAWARE 3CA TC 1 2L Y 2004 2122 3394 $559,900* $567,163 $167 80
KICKAPOO TR TR
28 2556216 11/30/2005 13323 2910 4 3/2 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $549,405 $549,405 $149 52
Dumbarton ST
29 2512242 7/08/2005 1800 Halifax ST 2910 4 3/2 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $547,635 $522,960 $142 9
30 2451180 2/18/2005 13229 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 2781 3756 $546,905 $546,905 $146 117
Dumbarton ST
31 2468250 2/04/2005 13868 Broad 2910 4 3/1 CHESWICK 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1650 4122 $539,500 $517,000 $125 34
Meadow PL
32 2568615 11/30/2005 1767 Fairmount 2910 4 3/2 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $538,645 $538,645 $146 9
ST
33 2565218 10/19/2005 13326 Berwick 2910 4 3/2 Village of 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 0 3692 $530,740 $530,740 $144 0
LN
34 2526449 5/03/2005 13336 2910 4 3/2 Village of 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2106 3692 $524,215 $524,215 $142 0
Dumbarton ST
35 2556083 8/12/2005 1763 Halifax 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 2 2L Y 2005 1420 3510 $523,890 $523,890 $149 194
36 2528760 6/10/2005 1775 N Halifax 2910 3 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 2380 3756 $520,465 $524,315 $140 7
ST
37 2463281 4/04/2005 13315 2910 4 3/1 Manors at W 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1956 3510 $513,105* $504,990 $144 64
Dumbarton
38 2574524 12/14/2005 13448 2910 4 3/1 THE 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1800 3263 $510,730 $510,730 $157 0
Spotswood ST MANORS
39 2543611 9/16/2005 14580 Jason 2910 5 4/1 FOSTER 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1296 2994 $509,000 $509,000 $170 38
Street ESTA
40 2455229 1/25/2005 13257 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 2 2L Y 2004 1956 3510 $505,210 $499,505 $142 31
Dumbarton ST
41 2557131 1/13/2006 1766 Fairmount 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1800 3263 $483,515 $482,680 $148 37
ST
42 2455128 4/20/2005 13271 2910 4 3/1 The Manors 3CA TC 1 2L Y 2004 1800 3263 $462,655 $442,740 $136 95
Dumbarton ST
43 2563578 10/05/2005 6110 Tanana 2910 4 3/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1500 3200 $444,480 $444,480 $139 0
DR
44 2523252 6/10/2005 5931 Osage DR 2910 4 3/1 Cherry Cree 3CATC 1 2L Y 2005 1770 3202 $439,900 $424,900 $133 11
45 2538148 8/08/2005 3801 Verdure 2910 4 2/1 Long Branch 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1664 3059 $398,000 $392,800 $128 12
LN
46 2460668 3/14/2005 12051 Aubum 2910 4 2/1 Long Branch 3CATC 1 2L Y 2004 0 2800 $386,205* $360,000 $129 118
Creek Crossing
47 2530029 6/02/2005 4084 Dolan WA 2910 4 2/2 Claybourne 3CATC 1 1L Y 2005 0 3350 $378,265 $422,865 $126 198
48 2526701 6/23/2005 14024 2910 4 2/1 RIDGE AT 2CATC 1 2L Y 2004 1200 2606 $313,345* $310,000 $119 32
AMBLEWlND HA
PL
Min 3 2004 1,082 2,600 $313,345 $310,000 $119 2
Max 6 2006 3,075 5,085 $985,910 $985,910 $242 473
Average 4 2005 1912 3768 $598,529 $591,326 $156 100
Number of Properties: 48
Average (SalePrice / SqFt MU ) = $156
Information deemed RELIABLE but not GUARANTEED
This is not an appraisal.
Copyright: @ MIBOR 2006 All Rights Reserved
Prepared by
David Martin
317-843-7766
F. C. Tucker Company
dmartin@mibor.net
Your iaitial search criteria were: ((L1STSTATUS='CLOSD' AND (CLOSEDDATE>=CONVERT(DATETIME,'01l01/2005')))) AND (( AREA IN (2910) ) )
AND (RESCONOO LIKE '%RES%') AND (ACRES>=.4 AND ACRES<=.5) AND (YEARBUIL T>=2004)
/'
j