Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact ..j . . ';:'.., u Q '" Docket No.: Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed sign height & size will not be detrimental since it is essentially the same as the existing case. Also, the elimination of one . sign will give a clearer look. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be' affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The adjacent areas will not be affected adverselyLbecause the proposed sign is similar to the existing. The.new sign will have an updated look. which will help values. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: . The nee.dsof the business to inform customers requires more than the code allows. In addition, the existing signs could not meet current requirements. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the CarmellClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. . is granted, subject to any condItions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. ~ .~ SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals 7~~~ Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). s:\fortns'devstand.app w o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Cannel, Indiana Docket No.: \!-loq--ol ~~ (2-13,0'1 ~~ ~~) Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT ~ DEVELOPMENT AL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATEDTHIS ;<~ DAYOF ~~ ,2001. ~ Dv_ _ ~ ~I~/ . Board Member Page 7 ell 8 - Developmental Standards Vallance AppliCation u o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Petitioner: ~- \001- 0\ ~f1Lv ~()...J Docket No.: FINDINGS OF FACT . DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS -z,....-z-' . DAYOFW7"m~ , 2001. . /J." f!- ~\...-- Board Member ~ Page 7 of 8 - Developmental Standaros Variance Application u o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: ~ - \CC\. - a , Petitioner: <::;'\:'\.c...u... ~~~ FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATEDTHIS ~t:\ DAY OF ~~<C. ,2001. Board~~~ Page 7 rA 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Application w (,;) CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS .. Cannel, Indiana Docket No.: 1/-/69 -0/ Petitioner: 1. FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE 'Ballot Sheet) rd~~()~ 2. 3. DATED THIS :;12- DAY OF 4~ ~' BoaI1:fMember .2001. Page 7 fA 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Application u o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: If.u / 0 9 - oj ~I!~/I. OIL {o Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS d~ DAY OF ,2001. Page 7 Of 8 - Developmental Standards Vanance Application u Q " '> " Petitioner: CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA ~ - \\()... 0 \ <;:~Cl LC::;::'" ~ ~e~ FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE Docket No.: 1. The approval of ti:lis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed sign height & size will not be detrimental since it is essentially the same as the existing case. Also, the elimination of one . sign will give a clearer look. 2. The use and value of the area adjacentto the properly included in the variance will not be. affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The adjacent areas will not be affected adversely!,because the proposed sign is similar to the existing. The new sign will have an u~dated look. which will helo values. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The needs of the business to inform customers requires more than the code allows. In addition, the existing signs could not meet current requirements. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the CarmeUClay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance Docket No. ' is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, Which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. ~~ ~ SECRETARY, CarmeUClay Board of Zoning Appeals ~~)J' Conditions oftha Soard are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign). s:\formsldevstand.scc n ___1__ o Q CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Docket No.: Carmel, Indiana v- //(J- 0/ Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS :;2 ~ DAY OF ~~~ ~, ~~... " ,2001. ~ Page 7 of 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Application _______~_______________1 o o CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS ~ Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: v - /10 - 01 .s /-I UL- ([!)f a(') Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT AL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS Old--. DAY OF ,2001. Page 7 Of 8 - Developmental Standatds Variance Application u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS . Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: J J 0 . / // "'- , . ~l - ~/(J 7$ ~~I~ ~~ Petitioner: FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS C2:2-nd DAY OF ~ ,2001. ~~' Board Member Page 7 of 8 . Developmental Standerds Variance Application u Q CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS .. Docket No.: Petitioner: J - UO-Ol ~~ srA91~ Carmel, Indiana FINDINqS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS ;z....-z- DAY OF 0~1'1- ~ ,2001. Board Member Page 7 of 8 . Developmental Standards Variance Application u u CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Carmel, Indiana Docket No.: ~ - \ 'CO - 0 \ Petitioner: ~~ ~~\o~ FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet) 1. 2. 3. DATEDTHIS ~~~() DAYOF C::J~~ ,2001. ~~b-~~",-~>-~ Board ber Page 7 cI 8 - Developmental Standards Variance Application