Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1 -3, plus first two blanks) Docket No: Docket No. PZ-2023-00238 V UDO Section 2.06 Lot Coverage - Maximum 35% lot coverage allowed, 51% requested. Petitioner: Abbe& Evan Bayless 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The pool will also have an automatic pool cover to protect the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. The pool will have a privacy fence and landscaping to ensure it will only be accessed by the homeowners. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The adjacent property will not be able to see or access the pool due to the fence and landscaping. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The installation of this pool will not result in practical difficulties of use of property because it will be an enhancement to the home and minimize the amount of landscaping and yardwork needed as well as create privacy from Spring Mill Road and adjacent properties. DECISION IT IS THERWORE the decision of he Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. f Z'1613'oo2sis V is granted,subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. dopted this 1 day of Q V• 20 a7 3 HE RING OFFICER, Car el Board of Zoning Appeals 'AtAiN" SEC ARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1 -3, plus first two blanks) Docket No: PZ-2023-00239 V UDO Section 5.02.C.7 Side Setback - a swimming pool, hot tub, or its deck or equipment shall be set back a minimum of the greater of the following: 10-ft from the side lot line and rear lot line, or be 3-ft from any easement (4-ft side setback from lot line requested). Petitioner: Abbe& Evan Bayless 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The pool will also have an automatic pool cover to protect the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. The pool will have a privacy fence and landscaping to ensure it will only be accessed by the homeowners. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The adjacent property will not be able to see or access the pool due to the fence and landscaping. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The installation of this pool will not result in practical difficulties of use of property because it will be an enhancement to the home and minimize the amount of landscaping and yardwork needed as well as create privacy from Spring Mill Road and adjacent properties. DECISION IT IS THEREf ORE the decision of t�hg Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. -202.3-01)&94 V is granted,subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. opted this a daN)of !JAC• , 20 073 . HE ING OFFICE;R Car el Board of Zoning Appeals SECRE RY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant. FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS (Petitioner to fill out 1 -3, plus first two blanks) Docket No: PZ-2023-00240 V UDO Section 5.02.E Rear Setback-on Through Lots no residential accessory building shall be erected forward of any principal building, or in any required minimum yard (Minimum 20-ft setback required, 4-ft setback requested). Petitioner: Abbe & Evan Bayless 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The pool will also have an automatic pool cover to protect the public health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. The pool will have a privacy fence and landscaping to ensure it will only be accessed by the homeowners. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: The adjacent property will not be able to see or access the pool due to the fence and landscaping. They will have no direct sightlines or exposure to the pool. Given proximity to Spring Mill Road, any improvements or changes to the yard would require a variance. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Unified Development to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: The installation of this pool will not result in practical difficulties of use of property because it will be an enhancement to the home and minimize the amount of landscaping and yardwork needed as well as create privacy from Spring Mill Road and adjacent properties. DECISION IT IS THERE ,ORE th decision off he Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance Docket No. Z.' 00 2.40 V is granted,subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made apart hereof. opted this clayNOV- ' of 1 1a i• , 20 IS .iHE NG O FICER Car el Board Zoning Appeals SECRE Y, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of approval of the Board, if any, are listed on the Letter of Grant.