HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes RES 11-13-23Westemeier: Is there an age restriction for this development? Rex Ramage: There's no age restriction in place.
Westemeier: What's the Department thought on the removal of the east and west connections? Alexia Lopez: We would
really like to see the east connection, even though the County would be taking this land. The County mentioned they
would allow a connection. Jon Dobosiewicz: The County would have a ramp that would serve two connections at the
future roundabouts north and south of 14611 on Gray Road. Presented a future drawing of 146`" Street & Gray Road
Westermeier: I don't ever remember a PUD making such drastic changes. Are there any advantages of now not going
through the PUD Rezone? Alexia Lopez: We discussed this with the Petitioner. We have already started the PUD
process. Variances would probably be needed. We already have a governing document in their PUD Ordinance, where we
can make the updates. It helps to have a document to track all these changes. Rex Ramage: We thought that having one
governing document (PUD) guiding this project would be beneficial and help keep track of all the standards.
Westermeier: There's only 3 types of homes you will be offering. I think these homes look very monotonous to me. Is
there any way to change the look and feel of these. Rex Ramage: With only 31 homes, we typically don't change up the
garage orientations. We can vary the architecture. Westermeier: Bring in 10 different elevations for this development.
Buckler: What's landscape is planned along the south property line? Rex Ramage: The entirety of the south property line
is a 25-ft tree preservation area. We will keep and maintain anything that is not dead or invasive. If we have to remove,
we will plant new trees to fill in the gaps.
Westermeier: Any plans for overflowing parking? Rex Ramage: Each home has 5 on -site parking spaces, and any
overflow parking would take place on the public streets.
This item will continue to the Dec. S Residential Committee
2. Docket No. PZ-2023-00138 DP/ADLS: LEO Cottages and Multi -family at The Legacy.
The applicant seeks site plan and design approval for a new apartment complex with 350 units made up of cottage
style homes and three 4-story buildings as well as a future commercial parcel. The site is located at the southwest
corner of 1461 Street and Community Drive. It is zoned Legacy PUD (Z-501-07 and Z-679-22). Filed by Jim
Shinaver and Jon Dobosiewicz of Nelson & Frankenberger, on behalf of Advenir Oakley Development, LLC.
Petitioner: Jon Dobosiewicz:
• We are still working out some details with Staff and we know we will come back to this Committee on Dec. 5
Scott Weathers, Advenir
• Our main focus is at the retail corner of off Community Drive and Hopewell Pkwy. Apartment unit building A
will have gable roof -tops, Juliette balconies, and in -sets of the Pt floor retail. We wanted to use black and white
exterior colors on the building so there will be more of a focus on this building.
■ We have not narrowed down any tenants in the retail space, but we will have it ready for commercial
■ I will setup a meeting with Aliza Shalit, Carmel Sign Specialist, to narrow down the signage type and location
Department Report: Alexia Lopez
We like the adjustments that were made by the Petitioner
■ We asked for more windows and dormers on the cottage homes
• We need a legible photometric (lighting) plan
For Unit N on the southwest side of the plan, the side facade that faces the street to use all masonry wainscot
■ We would like to see a continuous wainscot feature on the sides of the attached garages to units that have
masonry so it will continue all away around the building.
• There's so much signage being proposed, so we need to narrow down what signs are going where
• Staff recommends this is continued to the Dec. 5 Residential Committee for further discussion
Committee Comments:
Westermeier: Can you bring in physical examples of your exterior colors? Scott Weathers: Yes, we mostly use earthly
tones. We have 19 color pallet variations.
2
Residential Committee 11-13-23
Campagna: Will you be using veneer or real masonry? I don't want a pho brick. Scott Weathers: We will use real
masonry brick materials.
Westermeier: Where are we at in adding dormers to the front of the 2-bedroom duplex units? Scott Weathers: We
would like to add gables to the front, and dormers on the longer portion of the unit. Alexia Lopez: I would like the
dormers added to the longer side to help break things up, and most of these facades face the street.
Westermeier: We would like to see the bike parking calculations for the entire site. Scott Weathers: Our civil engineer
is working on the numbers. I will get you the parking numbers and ratios. We will provide enough per the standards.
Westermeier: Is there an enhancement of the 30% masonry requirement, per Staff s request? Scott Weathers: During
the zoning process, we agreed to 30%. The PUD states 30% and we will be just over 30% requirement of masonry. The
corner units will be all masonry.
Westermeier: Where will the trash area be located? Scott Weathers: The centralized location is shown on the site plan,
and we will make sure it will be maintained and kept clean. We will offer trash pickup service for residents.
Buckler: Will there be any ADA units? Scott Weathers: We will abide by the FHA requirements.
This item will continue to the Dec. 5 Residential Committee
3. Docket No. PZ-2023-00153 PP: Asherwood South Subdivision.
4. Docket No. PZ-2023-00184 SW: Asherwood South Waiver — UDO 7.26: Private Streets Not Permitted,
Private Streets requested.
The applicant seeks primary plat approval and design standards waiver approval for 6 lots on 14.78 acres. The
site is located at 9950 Ditch Road. It is zoned S-1/Residential. Filed by Brett Huff with Kimley-Horn on behalf
of Gradison Design Build.
Petitioner: Justin Moffett, Old Town Design Group:
■ With me tonight is Brett Huff of Kimley-Horn
■ We have a few outstanding items remaining with Staff from our initial public hearing
a We wanted to provide a turnaround for our residents, so we are proposing a roundabout with a center island
a If there are private streets, then the UDO requires stacking will be provided on the public side of the street. This
creates a challenge for us on Royalton Drive, in Deerfield subdivision, provides drawing
+ Jane Funke, at 1615 Royalton Drive, has requested to not have this connection to our subdivision
• We would have to install a cul-de-sac bulb on our side, provide enough clearance for a gate with a knock box and
for a firetruck to get through, and a cul-de-sac on their side
■ We don't have a solution; we would want to save the existing mature tree, please the neighbor's request, and meet
the UDO requirements, or ask for a waiver. We would refer to the Committee to give us a solution.
Brett Huff — a cul-de-sac on their side should have been installed when Deerfield was developed. Alexia Lopez: They
left the street stubbed, for future connection, as required by the Ordinance.
Committee Comments:
Westermeier: In a perfect world, what do you want done? Justin Moffett: As shown in our drawing, add a cul-de-sac on
our side, and get the waiver for the Deerfield side, to keep the stub -street a gate connection to our side.
Westermeier: Would you like to table this so the Department can figure out what they want at this connection and if an
additional waiver is needed? Justin Moffett: We can table this and work out this issue.
Docket Nos. PZ-2023-00153 PP & PZ-2023-00184 SW will be tabled to the Dec. S Residential Committee
3
Residential Committee 11-13-23