HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes RES 11-13-23Campagna: Will you be using veneer or real masonry? I don't want a pho brick. Scott Weathers: We will use real
masonry brick materials.
Westermeier: Where are we at in adding dormers to the front of the 2-bedroom duplex units? Scott Weathers: We
would like to add gables to the front, and dormers on the longer portion of the unit. Alexia Lopez: I would like the
dormers added to the longer side to help break things up, and most of these facades face the street.
Westermeier: We would like to see the bike parking calculations for the entire site. Scott Weathers: Our civil engineer
is working on the numbers. I will get you the parking numbers and ratios. We will provide enough per the standards.
Westermeier: Is there an enhancement of the 30% masonry requirement, per Staff s request? Scott Weathers: During
the zoning process, we agreed to 30%. The PUD states 30% and we will be just over 30% requirement of masonry. The
corner units will be all masonry.
Westermeier: Where will the trash area be located? Scott Weathers: The centralized location is shown on the site plan,
and we will make sure it will be maintained and kept clean. We will offer trash pickup service for residents.
Buckler: Will there be any ADA units? Scott Weathers: We will abide by the FHA requirements.
This item will continue to the Dec. 5 Residential Committee
3. Docket No. PZ-2023-00153 PP: Asherwood South Subdivision.
4. Docket No. PZ-2023-00184 SW: Asherwood South Waiver — UDO 7.26: Private Streets Not Permitted,
Private Streets requested.
The applicant seeks primary plat approval and design standards waiver approval for 6 lots on 14.78 acres. The
site is located at 9950 Ditch Road. It is zoned S-1/Residential. Filed by Brett Huff with Kimley-Horn on behalf
of Gradison Design Build.
Petitioner: Justin Moffett, Old Town Design Group:
■ With me tonight is Brett Huff of Kimley-Horn
■ We have a few outstanding items remaining with Staff from our initial public hearing
a We wanted to provide a turnaround for our residents, so we are proposing a roundabout with a center island
a If there are private streets, then the UDO requires stacking will be provided on the public side of the street. This
creates a challenge for us on Royalton Drive, in Deerfield subdivision, provides drawing
+ Jane Funke, at 1615 Royalton Drive, has requested to not have this connection to our subdivision
• We would have to install a cul-de-sac bulb on our side, provide enough clearance for a gate with a knock box and
for a firetruck to get through, and a cul-de-sac on their side
■ We don't have a solution; we would want to save the existing mature tree, please the neighbor's request, and meet
the UDO requirements, or ask for a waiver. We would refer to the Committee to give us a solution.
Brett Huff — a cul-de-sac on their side should have been installed when Deerfield was developed. Alexia Lopez: They
left the street stubbed, for future connection, as required by the Ordinance.
Committee Comments:
Westermeier: In a perfect world, what do you want done? Justin Moffett: As shown in our drawing, add a cul-de-sac on
our side, and get the waiver for the Deerfield side, to keep the stub -street a gate connection to our side.
Westermeier: Would you like to table this so the Department can figure out what they want at this connection and if an
additional waiver is needed? Justin Moffett: We can table this and work out this issue.
Docket Nos. PZ-2023-00153 PP & PZ-2023-00184 SW will be tabled to the Dec. S Residential Committee
3
Residential Committee 11-13-23