The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondencePlan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please upload copies of your correspondence with the TAC members and their correspondence with you. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:18 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Angie Conn - 4/16/24 10:54 AM This comment remains active. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Noted. Resolved 2 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment On Sheet 1 of the plat, some of the the S-1 zoning district development standards you list appear to be more restrictive that what the UDO actually allows. Is this on purpose? For example. you list 40-ft rear yard setbacks instead of 20-ft... Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Yes. The setback requirements listed on sheet 1 are correct. These are per commitments that run with this site that were previously agreed to and recorded. Resolved 3 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment For the minimum front yard building setbacks, you show 40-ft, but shouldn't you show 75-ft for now (due to the restrictive covenants)? Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM The 75' front setback in the restrictive covenants went to a court hearing and has been legally reduced to 40'. Documentation of this change has already been provided to Angie Conn at City of Carmel Planning Dept. Resolved 4 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please make a note on the plat about the Pond in CA #6, or jut label it on the plan, and please dash in the pond boundary. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Pond labeled in plan view on sheet 2 and 3. Resolved 5 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please show/add at least one concrete monument to an outer corner of the subdivision (technically all outer corners should have concrete monuments). Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Concrete Monuments added to the northeast and southeast corners of the development. Resolved REVIEW COMMENTS Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 6 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment On Sheet 1 of the plat, under the S-1 development standards, please also list the minimum aggregate of side yards. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:18 PM Revised. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Angie Conn - 4/16/24 10:57 AM the S1 zoning district requires a 30-ft minimum aggregate of side yards, not 40-ft. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM This is now shown. Resolved 7 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Only after all TAC review are addressed, then please work with Caleb Warner in the City Engineering Dept. to get on a BPW (Board of Public Works) meeting agenda, which has a filing deadline. His number is 571-2441, and his email address is cwarner@carmel.in.gov Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Noted. Resolved 8 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Staff has been advised that we cannot present a Secondary Plat to the Director for signature from this point forward until Ms. Terry Krueskamp (tkrueskamp@carmel.in.gov) in Information Systems has received an e-mail with an electronic file attached (MicroStation .dgn is preferred, or AutoCad .dwg of the subdivision) and it (the e-mail) has been copied to myself (aconn@carmel.in.gov), OR please upload a .dgn or .dwg file of the proposed plat. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Cad file will be provided upon approval of Secondary Plat so we know that no further changes are needed. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 9 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please submit a revised Secondary Plat after making above-mentioned changes. Once these changes have been made and comments addressed, please produce a Mylar copy (with the surveyors and land owners signatures) for signature by this Department. 1 digital copy of the plat must be provided with the Mylar copy, prior to recording, and then 1 paper copy and 1 electronic copy of the scanned, recorded plat must be submitted following recording of the document. Our approval of the secondary plat (signature) will be forthcoming upon revision of the plans according to the listed review comments. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Angie Conn - 7/8/24 2:30 PM This comment remains active until completed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:19 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Noted. The mylar will be provided at a later date once we are confident no further changes are necessary. UnResolved 10 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Lastly, please submit a .pdf or .jpg file of the scanned, Recorded plat. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Angie Conn - 7/8/24 2:30 PM This will be a condition of approval. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:19 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Noted. UnResolved 11 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please upload a draft copy of the proposed Covenants & Restrictions for this neighborhood. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM This development will follow same CCR's as previous Asherwood to the north. A copy of these have been uploaded. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 12 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:10 PM Library Comment Please note that the $2,272.75 secondary plat filing fee is still due. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:19 PM Developer has been made aware of these fees and will have them paid soon. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM Developer has been made aware of these fees and will have them paid soon. Resolved 13 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:12 PM Comment Please upload a copy of the agreement amending the restrictive covenants. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM This has been uploaded. Resolved 14 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:13 PM Comment Please upload documentation or a copy of a recorded commitment that the west gate will only be used for emergency access and that the main entrance will be from Ditch Rd. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM This is noted under item #8 on page 2 of the recorded Restrictive Covenant Between Asherwood Carmel LLC and the Funkes document uploaded with this submittal. Resolved 15 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:15 PM Comment What is the status of the amended restrictive covenants, to allow the front yard building setbacks to be 40-ft, instead of 75-ft? Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM Has been legally approved to be reduced to 40' Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 16 1 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/15/24 3:29 PM Comment What will the gate look like that will be added to the westernmost boundary of Block B (the private street)? (The Landscape Plan states that the existing entrance gate at that location will be relocated to the new entrance, so what will go in its place?) Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:18 PM Yes. The current entrance gate will be relocated to the western road connection. Extra fence panels similar to that along the frontage of ditch road will replace where the existing gate is located. Apologies for not being clear in my previous response. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Angie Conn - 4/16/24 11:01 AM so, it will look like the main gate's design? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM The developer has extra fence panels that will replace the gate location. Resolved 17 1 Fire Carmel Fire 2/19/24 7:50 AM Comment Section 3312.1 Fire Hydrants shall be fully functional tested and approved prior to any combustible materials arriving on the construction site. Info Only 18 1 Fire Carmel Fire 2/19/24 7:51 AM Comment Section 3310.1 Required Fire Department Vehicle Access. Approved Asphalt fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to and through the construction site during construction. Fire Apparatus access road must be capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus and maintained clear at all times. Info Only 19 1 Vectren Energy Chad Miller 3/4/24 11:19 AM Comment No comments on the secondary plat. Please have the developer call into the new service center to have the service line retired and gas meter removed on the existing building before demoing. Info Only 20 1 TriCo Regional Sewer Utility Ryan Hartman 3/4/24 2:50 PM Comment Plan review comments were send to Brett Huff w/ kimley-horn on 3/1/2024. Waiting on revised plans set for final review. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:15 AM Comments revised. Resolved 21 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please provide a professional engineer's stamp on the plans Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Now Provided. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 22 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that there are no direct discharge areas Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM There are no disturbed areas of direct discharge. Resolved 23 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that all elevations are North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD) Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM All elevations are NAVD88 Resolved 24 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that the horizontal datum of topgraphic map is Indiana State Plane Coordinates, NAD83 Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Horizontal datum is Indiana State Plane East, NAD83 Resolved 25 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of existing utilities with top of curb and invert elevations, pipe sizes, and direction are shown Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Shown to the best of our knowledge from collected survey information. Resolved 26 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that all existing culverts, pipes, and bridges on existing drives or under the roadway are shown indicating size, type, and invert elevations Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Shown to the best of our knowledge from collected survey information Resolved 27 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/11/24 2:44 PM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of all existing electrical power vaults, transformers, power lines, gas lines, television cable , and telephone lines are shown Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Shown to the best of our knowledge from collected survey information Resolved 28 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 10:55 AM Changemark The construction entrance will need to be included in the area of disturbance C110 TOPO DEMO PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Now included. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 29 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 10:57 AM Changemark This work will need to be included within the area of disturbance C110 TOPO DEMO PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM Now included. Resolved 30 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 12:56 PM Changemark Please provide more clarity on this pipe removal We would like to know how the water directed to this pipe currently will be handled during construction. Will a temporary swale be graded across the site to allow the water to continue to flow from west to east? Or will the existing pipe remain until the the new pipe run is installed and tied into the system? Please clarify. C110 TOPO DEMO PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM Note added to plan sheet to mention contractor to ensure positive drainage between two flared end sections at all times during construction of new pipe. Resolved 31 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:21 PM Changemark How will the drainage and drainage complaints from the adjacent property owners be handled here? Per our email conversation on 1/17/24, the drainage along this property line was to be investigated and revised to provide relief to the adjacent property owner. However, on the plans it appears that it will remain as is. Please clarify. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM The west side of lot 44 now has a swale encompassed in a 10' D.E. directing future flow north towards STR 610. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 7/23/24 8:55 AM Thank you for adding the swale in the rear of the lot but it appears that the west side of lot 44 is directed across the middle of the lot and through the building pad. I have discussed this with the City Engineer and he will require that these grading issues be resolved prior to plan approval in order to avoid any significant drainage redesign during the building permit process. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Grading revised. TPE on west property line of lot 44 now graded towards the development. A Swale has been added to the southern property lines of lots 44 and 45. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/25/24 2:47 PM It appears that the existing grading to remain is draining to the area that has been reported as an existing drainage issue. To achieve positive drainage away from the proposed lot pad and eventual home, it will need to be demonstrated that no portion of the lot outside the limits of the tree preservation will drain in that direction and facilities will need to be shown and installed. Otherwise, the development will need to provide a drainage outlet for the adjacent property that will help Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM alleviate the current reported issue. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM The land onsite is to be undisturbed. Lot 32 of Deerfield has a small depression on their property that holds water before it can drain north to the existing ditch. We are not responsible for improving their property with this development. However, developer has been in contact with adjacent neighbors and we'll work with them to the best of our ability within our site limits to improve their current drainage conditions. This development is increasing the allowable flow into the outfall pipe for Deerfield. which should improve drain down time of the ditch. 32 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:21 PM Changemark Please provide the proposed grading here as called out on the demolition plan C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM Now provided. Resolved 33 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:27 PM Changemark Please provide the elevations of the proposed topo lines here C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM Additional Contour Labels added. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 34 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:33 PM Changemark Please verify the hatching in the clogged condition here is accurate At the elevation of 848.6, the ponding in this area would extend south into the lot and into the building pad based on the contour lines shown on the site development plan. C210 EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Emergency Flood Routing plan revised. The plan now shows ponding occurring in drainage easements. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/25/24 2:53 PM The ponding shown will need to be placed within a drainage easement in order to have it within the lot as currently proposed per Section 303.07 of the Stormwater Technical Standards Manual. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM The bold lines on the Emergency Flood Route plan shows possible elevations for a homesite. Plot plans would need to ensure that the emergency flood routing path would be directed north as shown on the plans. Resolved 35 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:33 PM Changemark These contour lines are not shown on the site development plan The 853 and 854 contour lines shown here are not located on the site development/grading plan. Please revise the sheets to represent the correct information and correspond with each other. These lines would effect the FFE, MLAG, and MFPG of the proposed home if they are to remain. C210 EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Revised. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/26/24 10:15 AM Please make the grading consistent throughout the plan set. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM The Emergency Flood Routing Plan shows assumed proposed elevations after a home would be constructed. Plot plans for these custom homes would have to ensure that the flood routing path would be unobstructed. The Site development plan and other sheets shows the neceessary grading for install of roadway and utilities. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 36 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:35 PM Changemark An off-site easement will need to be obtained from the adjacent property owner in order to have the ponding on their property Please have this shown on the plans and an agreement with the adjacent property owner submitted with the next submittal or revise the site to contain the ponding. C210 EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Ponded area revised. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/25/24 2:57 PM Per Section 303.07 of the STSM, the ponding shall stay within the limits of the development. An easement will need to be obtained for the adjacent property owner to permit this condition as current shown. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM The area noted is a localized low point. It is proposed to do the same ponding it would be today, but there would be an inlet provided to push water out faster instead of ponding on whatever structure it goes to today. We cannot berm the proposed grade to contain this flood routing within our property limits without damming up the neighboring offsite flow. By putting an inlet here, we would be improving the ponding that already occurs. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 37 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 1:42 PM Changemark Are these elevations correct? Although they are above the pond, they are well below the roadway and ponding around structure 610. Additionally, they are all below the proposed grading shown for the lot, anywhere from 1' to 10'. Please clarify and revised to meet the requirements of the STSM. C210 EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Added MFPG to the front of the pad shown. We believe that the addition of the rear yard swale will improve the drainage for this lot after the home is built if the berm is to stay. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/26/24 10:25 AM Please also provide a MFPG for the front of this lot. These elevations are still below the grading to the west of the lot pad shown. All grading necessary for this and the other lot pads need to be shown throughout the plan set. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:12 AM With these all be custom homes and some having walkout basements such as Lot 45, we have added denoted a front MLAG/MFFE based on 15" above the curb elevation and a rear MLAG/MFFE based on 2 feet above the 100 year elevation of the lake. Resolved 38 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 2:56 PM Changemark Please show perimeter protection around the pond Perimeter protection will need to be placed at the top of bank of the pond in order to protect it from construction activity. C300 INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Added. Resolved 39 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 2:56 PM Changemark Please place perimeter protection at the top of bank on each side of this drainage channel and the receiving pond C300 INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Added. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 40 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 2:56 PM Changemark Please provide dewatering guidelines and details for removing the existing pond C300 INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Sheet C334 added. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 4/22/24 9:43 AM It doesn't appear that sheet C334 was uploaded with this submittal. Please provide this with the next submittal for our review. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Added Note to pond on C300 and C110 referencing sheet C334. Resolved 41 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:00 PM Changemark Please clearly call out both water quality units on this sheet Please include the brand and size of each unit. C320 PERM EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Callout added. Resolved 42 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:00 PM Changemark Please show the BMP easement over each water quality unit Please ensure the BMPE is connected to the City's right-of-way or an ingress/egress easement to allow the City to access the unit is necessary. C320 PERM EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Both water quality units are located within C.A. #6 which is denoted as a BMPE. WQ Str. #600B is adjacent to roadway that is within an I.E.E. WQ Str. #611B is adjacent to 10' asphalt path for access. Path is within C.A. that is entirely a BMPE so access is there for the City. Resolved 43 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:00 PM Changemark Please show protections for the culvert removal on this sheet and any other necessary erosion control sheet C320 PERM EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Revised. Resolved 44 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:03 PM Changemark Please include the dewatering of the small pond on the northside of the site under this section C330 EROSION CONTROL SPECS AND DETAILS.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Revised. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 45 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:03 PM Changemark There is a discrepancy in what structures will be the water quality units The units listed here are 600B and 611B but the O&M manual list 600A and 611A. Please clarify which structures will be the WQ units and ensure consistency between all documents. C330 EROSION CONTROL SPECS AND DETAILS.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM O&M updated to reference STR. #600B and 611B. Resolved 46 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:05 PM Changemark Please include the pond aerator in this section as a BMP C330 EROSION CONTROL SPECS AND DETAILS.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Added. Resolved 47 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:19 PM Changemark Please provide a detail for each water quality units diversion structure C803 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Added to Sheet C803. Resolved 48 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:22 PM Changemark Please list the pond aerator as a BMP in this list Asherwood South O&M 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Text added. Resolved 49 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:22 PM Changemark Please include the pond aerator to this list Asherwood South O&M 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:13 AM Text added. Resolved 50 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:22 PM Changemark Please show the BMP easement and pond aerator on the site map Asherwood South O&M 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Blanket BMP Easement for all of CA #6. Aerators added to BMP map. Resolved 51 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/12/24 3:22 PM Changemark Please provide details for the water quality units and their diversion structures Asherwood South O&M 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:14 AM Added. Resolved 52 1 Hamilton County Surveyor Samuel Clark 3/13/24 11:05 AM Comment Per initial agreements, the drainage infrastructure for this subdivision is to be privately maintained. Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 53 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 5:59 PM Changemark 102.02.v.c Please include all existing structures on the topo sheet. There are a few culverts called out to be removed but are not represented on the plans. Please also extend the limits of disturbance to fully cover all proposed culvert removals. C110 TOPO DEMO PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:09 AM Culverts and Inverts added. LOD updated to include these culverts. Resolved 54 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 5:59 PM Changemark 102.02.v.d Existing Project Site Layout shall include one hundred (100) year floodplains, floodway fringes, and floodways, established or identified in accordance with the City of Carmel Flood Hazard Area Ordinance. Please note if none exists. C110 TOPO DEMO PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:15 PM Note added to sheet C110. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/22/24 2:10 PM Please add floodplain note to relevant plan sheets ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM None exist. Resolved 55 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:01 PM Changemark 102.02.v.h Existing Project Site Layout shall include the identification and delineation of sensitive areas. Please include wetlands on existing conditions sheet. C109 OVERALL CONDITIONS PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Revised. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 56 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:20 PM Changemark 102.02.xi. There appears to be additional grading for the building pads shown on Sheet 210 not shown on this sheet and not reflected in the limits of disturbance. Please confirm that there will be no additional grading beyond the limits of plotted limits of disturbance. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:45 PM Refer to REF #85 for comment response. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 7/22/24 6:42 PM Please refer to Ref.# 85. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Grading Revised. Please refer to the drainage report in the paragraphs above the release rate table for explanation of grading for each lot. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:25 PM Please coordinate with Engineering regarding this comment. Based on our experience with Asherwood North, there are concerns that the plot plans will not accurately reflect the proposed drainage patterns and potentially perpetuate or worsen drainage problems on Lots 32 & 33. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM In order to build the subdivision for custom lots, the limits of disturbance only show areas to be disturbed for install of utility and road infrastructure. Individual plot plans will provide additional limits of distrubance for each platted lot. Contours shown around pads on sheet C210 are shown to reflect the eventual grading of a home on each lot for emergency flood routing around said homes. These are not shown on sheet C200 as they will not be graded in this manor as part of development phase. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 57 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:20 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.m Please clarify the pre-developed rates to outlet as to whether that is for the overall drainage area or just on-site. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:27 PM This comment will remain unresolved until Ref #72 is addressed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Additional text added for clarity. Resolved 58 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:21 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.q Grading and drainage plan shall include drainage arrows indicating all surface drainage, swales and on each side of every break in swale slopes. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Added Drainage arrows indicating all surface drainage for post-developed conditions. Resolved 59 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:22 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.r & 302.308.1 Grading and drainage plan shall include the labeling the slopes of all surface drainage swales. Provisions shall be incorporated into facilities for complete interior drainage of dry bottom facilities, including a minimum 1% bottom slope in all directions if tile underdrains are provided and a minimum of 2% if no underdrains are provided. A positive/gravity outlet is required for the underdrains in all dry-bottom detention facilities. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM The only true swale is on the rear of Lot 46 and it is labeled appropriately. There are no dry bottom detention facilities designed with this development. Storm structure #604 is designed to pick up a low pocket area but is not designed as dry basin. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 60 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:23 PM Changemark 102.02.xiv Please indicate structures that are WQ diversion structures and include details for said structures. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Indianapolis Stormwater Quality Unit Selection Guide now included. Water quality basin map is the same as previous proposed basin maps included within the DR. Basin Map now included in Appendix D. STR. 620 removed and replaced with a vegetated swale per email coordination on 9-30-2024. Additional items requested in the 9-30-2024 email also included in the plans. Water quality unit vendor has change to Stormtrap. It appears the previous units were not sized correctly. The new units are sized correctly. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 7/17/24 5:23 PM Please include Indianapolis Stormwater Quality Unit Selection Guide highlighting the chosen units. Please also include a WQ basin map. There does not appear to be a WQ unit to treat the runoff through the swale that ends at Str 620, please include. WQ Units shall be specified in the structure data table. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Diversion Weir height calculations now included in the DR on the last two pages. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:29 PM Please include diversion weir height calculations in the drainage report to confirm details are adequate. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM 600A and 611A are the diversion structures and have been called out on the Storm Profiles. Details added to sheet C803 Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 61 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:51 PM Changemark 302.03 Based on the analysis of the existing depressional storage, the allowable Post 10 & 100 yr release rates shall be equal to or less than Pre 2 & 10 yr release rates since those are more restrictive than 0.1/0.3 cfs. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Release rates have been revised. TOB for the pond has been raised to 840.60 to account for the increased pond staging. Lot 45's East property line has been shifted above the proposed 840.60 countour. Additional grading added behind the retaining wall to decrease the size of the 840.60 contour. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:30 PM Please detail the difficulties and hardships in the drainage report. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM We have recently had a meetin with the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office about the release rates for this site and difficulties. They have approved our release rates and we have included an email from HCSO stating such. Resolved 62 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 6:51 PM Changemark 302.03 Under no circumstances shall the post 100 yr release rate exceed the pre 100 yr release rates. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Revised. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:33 PM This comment will remain unresolved until Ref #61 & #72 are addressed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Per correspondants with the HCSO, they find the increase in release rates acceptable due to the circumstances regarding the offsite. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 63 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:04 PM Changemark 201.03 for the purpose of determining the postdeveloped conditions curve numbers, due to significant disturbance to the upper soil layers during the construction activities, the initially determined hydrologic soil group for disturbed areas should be changed to the next less infiltrating capacity category (i.e., A to B, B to C, and C to D). Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Updated. CN now 88. Resolved 64 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:08 PM Changemark 302.06.1 detention facilities shall be designed in such a manner that a minimum 90% of the original detention capacity is restored within 48 hours from the start of the design 100-year storm. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 7/22/24 6:43 PM Comment to remain unresolved until waiver is approved by BPWS ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Waiver request provided in this submittal. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 8:51 AM Please provide a waiver request to Engineering. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM In order to design the pond for extended detention requirements for a BMP, this standard cannot be achieved. Resolved 65 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:10 PM Changemark 302.06.12 detention basins shall be sized to detain the runoff from the fully developed right-of-way per the City of Carmel 20-year Thoroughfare Plan across all frontages, regardless of existing watershed boundaries or drainage breaks/divides. The acreage of the full right-of-way width shall be included in the overall acreage of the development in determining the allowable release rate. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:10 AM Revised. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 66 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:12 PM Changemark 302.11 Emergency overflow facilities shall be designed to convey, without overtopping the detention facility banks, one and one-quarter (1.25) times the peak inflow discharge and peak flow velocity resulting from the 100-year design storm event runoff from the entire contributing watershed draining to the detention/retention facility, assuming post-development condition on- site and existing condition off-site. Please provide cross section of overflow weir. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Cross Section provided on sheet C200 in the bottom left corner. Calculations added to DR. Resolved 67 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:13 PM Changemark 302.11 & 303.02 the emergency overflow routing from the emergency overflow facility to an adequate receiving system must be positive (by gravity) and shown on the construction plans and on the secondary plat. Please analyze the down stream flow path to the right of way. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Emergency overflow path to follow the legal drain easement per the existing conditions topography. This legal drain easement continues to the R/W of ditch road. Viewport in bottom left corner of sheet C 200 updated to show path to R/W Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 68 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:23 PM Changemark 700 Please provide mechanical BMP WQ flow and diversion structure calculations Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Noted. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 7/17/24 5:32 PM This comment will remain unresolved until Ref.#60 is addressed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:16 PM Weir Calculations provided at the end of the drainage report. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 4/23/24 2:34 PM Please include correspondence in the drainage report in lieu of diversion weird height calculations. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM 1"-24HR Rainfall Event added to last page of drainage report. Designer was told the weir elevation for the diversion structures are to be set to the crown elevation of the upstream pipe which coincides with the new details. Resolved 69 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:27 PM Changemark Offsite drainage Per teams meeting and email on 1/17/24, the inlets along the westerns and southwestern property lines were to be analyzed to verify the adequate capacity and upsize if found to be inadequate. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM Additional field data was collected on said pipes. The pipes were found to be adequate per their drainage basins. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 70 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/14/24 7:32 PM Changemark Legal Drain Please provide documentation from the County allowing a reduction of their statutory legal drain easement along the rerouted 30" and the existing county drain. Please also provide documentation for the portion of the easement that is being vacated. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Sam Clark's email approval included in this resubmittal. This project was approved for a 52.5 permit through HCSO during the 10-14-2024 County Drainage Board Meeting. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Legal drain will be removed and redirected towards proposed STR. 623 and flows southeast towards an existing manhole for the legal drain. HCSO does not want the SSD coming from Deerfield to tie into a private system, thus a relocation is required. New RDE shown in 30' Easement. Coordination included in this resubmittal. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM We are working with HCSO to satisfy their requirements. The legal drain easement provided is AT LEAST 30', but in some cases wider. Resolved 71 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/18/24 5:30 PM Changemark 302.03 The pre-developed analysis should also include the smaller pond. If that pond is somehow interconnected to the larger pond, that should be modeled in order to accurately determine the allowable post- developed release rates. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 4/12/24 11:11 AM The smaller pond is not interconnected with the larger pond. According to aerial imagery from Carmel's GIS, 2001 Photography shows construction of the clubhoues on this property. There are no distrubed paths between the two ponds, therefore we do not believe they are interconnected. We have also had survey crews onsite to collect data on every pipe entering the pond and none show connection to the smaller pond. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 72 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/23/24 12:13 PM Changemark Pre to Post watersheds Please clarify where the additional runoff is coming from. The watershed maps appear to have the same limits. The post-developed acreage is still the same as the previous submittal even though the right of way was added to the watershed, please clarify. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Additional acerage to L1 is coming from the watershed of the existing pond in the northeast corner. This watershed will be collected in the proposed storm system. Reference to this can be found in the drainage report under section 4.0 Proposed conditions, Paragraph 2. Resolved 73 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/23/24 2:23 PM Changemark 100-Year Staging Can the post dev 100-year staging be equal to the pre dev and would that allow for the total discharge to no exceed the pre-dev outflow? Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Revised. Resolved 74 2 TriCo Regional Sewer Utility Ryan Hartman 4/24/24 11:06 AM Comment Comments sent to Brett Huff 4/17 and waiting on revisions. Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:48 PM Comments have been addressed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:21 PM Noted. Resolved 75 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 4/26/24 10:26 AM Changemark The 100-year ponding on these lots will need to be placed within a drainage easement Per Section 303.07 of the STSM, the ponding on lots 42, 46, and 47 need to be placed within a drainage easement. Please show this on the next submittal. C210 EMERGENCY FLOOD PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM Revised. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 76 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 4/26/24 10:41 AM Changemark Please provide clarification on lot grading This hill is higher than the adjacent lot pad. All grading necessary to provide proper drainage around the pad needs to be shown for this hill to remain C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM Area regarded to have a general lowpoint with 1% slope between lots 44 and 45. The larger mound has been split into two smaller mounds entirely on each parcel. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 7/23/24 9:12 AM Please regrade the area to remove this hill along the property line between 44 and 45. Currently it is pushing drainage into both lots and directing it through both building pads which will create issues during the building permit process. It appears that several old storm pipes under the hill are to be removed and one new pipe is proposed under it so we foresee the area being heavily impacted during demo and construction and don't understand why it would be reinstalled. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:17 PM We believe that the addition of the rear yard swale will improve potential drainage problems with draining the berm around the home. The new swale's inlet and pipe is sized for both lots 44 and 45 to fully drain into. Resolved 77 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 4/26/24 10:41 AM Changemark Please adjust limits of disturbance to the edges of the tree preservation easements The previous section of Asherwood attempted to preserve areas on the lots that were later graded during the home building process. This type of disturbance needs to be reflected on this set of plans to avoid conflict during the home building process. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:18 PM The 25' TPE is located entirely within C.A. #6, so hopefully this voids any issues during the home building process. Construction limits shown to the western line of the TPE, unless encroachment is needed for grading. All lots area is now shown to be disturbed within the construction limits. Resolved 78 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 4/26/24 11:15 AM Changemark Please include a BMP designation on this easement as it contains the water quality units PLAT-PLAT 1-2.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 7/5/24 1:18 PM D.U.&S.S.E. Revised to D.U.S.S.&B.M.P.A.E. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 79 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 5:44 PM Changemark 303.02 Please provide swale capacity calculations for all swales on this project to verify compliance with 303.02. C610 SUBSURFACE DRAIN PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Swale Calculations added to drainage report. Resolved 80 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 5:44 PM Changemark 303.05.8 The maximum length of rear and side lot swales before reaching any inlet shall not exceed 300 feet or convey water from more than 3 residential lots, whichever is shorter, unless designed as a stormwater quality BMP that meets the design criteria provided in Appendix 701-1 of Chapter 700. Rear and side lot swales must be drained to a storm sewer inlet. Rear yard swales draining to end sections will not be permitted. C610 SUBSURFACE DRAIN PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 11/5/24 5:00 PM ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM We are requesting a variance to increase the maximum swale length to 475 L.F. Resolved 81 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 5:53 PM Changemark 302.08.1 Please provide slopes on all swales and underdrain where required for lots 42 & 43. C610 SUBSURFACE DRAIN PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Swale Labels added. We are requesting a varaince for having no SSD on the western swale of lot 43 due to no adequate outfall for the SSD. The slope of this swale has been increased as much as possible, while still considering existing grade and flood routing. Resolved 82 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 5:57 PM Changemark 302 Please clarify if this is one continuous drainage swale and verify compliance swale requirements. C610 SUBSURFACE DRAIN PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM There is approximately 105' of the existing swale that the developer wishes to remain undisturbed. A variance has been requested to void the SSD under the existing swale. This swale has an average existing slope of 1.54%. Resolved 83 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 5:59 PM Changemark 305.05 Please provide grate calculations for Str 620. Asherwood South DR 2-13-2024.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM STR. 620 has been removed and replaced with a vegetated swale with rock chute into the pond. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00022 SP Asherwood South Secondary Plat Workflow Started: 2/7/2024 1:39:04 PM Report Generated: 11/07/2024 08:17 AM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 84 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/17/24 6:05 PM Changemark HSCO correspondance Please provide the resolution to this conversation. HCSO Legal Drain Coordination.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:46 PM Sam Clark's email approval included in this resubmittal. This project was approved for a 52.5 permit through HCSO during the 10-14-2024 County Drainage Board Meeting. Resolved 85 3 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 7/22/24 6:42 PM Changemark Lots 44 & 45 grading These lots should be graded similar to Lots 43 & 42, where there are clearly established side yard swales and delineation of the watersheds. Lot 44 should have a side yard swale along the western limits of disturbance to avoid any potential for discharge to the west in the event that the proposed building pad is built at a higher elevation than the western limits. There should also be a general plan in place to handle drainage between Lots 44 and 45 in lieu of a mound, as currently shown. We understand that there will be some variation between the current grading plan and the final custom home site layout, however, as discussed at the 5/15/24 meeting, there needs to be a general grading plan that lays out the overall plan to drain runoff away from the future homes. Lots 44 and 45 currently show drainage being directed through the building pads, which will not be acceptable. Please also refer to Ref.# 56. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM The grading for these two lots have been revised. A swale has been added to the west side of lot 44, draining to STR. 610. This swale is encompasses in a 10' D.E. per our 8-8-2024 meeting. The side yard between lots 44 and 45 has been revised to split the mound into two, and lower the peak elevation of this mound. The side yard now serves as a proper outfall for the future home to drain into assuming the MFFE elevation is met. Resolved 86 3 Engineering Alex Jordan 7/23/24 9:53 AM Changemark Please provide more detail on the emergency access connection Please label the gate and it's post, provide the width of the access, and provide underdrain under the curb on the south side. Please also confirm that the pavement cross-section will be the local road cross-section. C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf Responded by: Gavinn Bakker - 10/15/24 2:47 PM SSD Added. Gate and post callouts, and width added on C200. Pavement cross-section will be of local road cross-section. Note added to sheet C400. Resolved 87 4 Engineering Alex Jordan 10/23/24 10:14 AM Comment We have no further comments on the plans. Before we can issue a stormwater management permit, the following items will need to be provided: 1. A signed and recorded O&M manual 2. A stormwater engineers estimate for all temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control measures 3. A stormwater performance bond for 100% of the approved estimate (once approved) 4. A right-of-way permit and $5,000 license and permit bond (the permit can be applied for here: https://cw.carmel.in.gov/PublicAccess/login) 5. Approval from Crossroad Engineers Info Only kimley-horn.com 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 317 218 9560 May 24, 2024 City of Carmel Engineering Department One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attention: Jeremy Kashman Re: Asherwood South Waiver Request on 90% of original detention volume restored within 48 hours from start of 100-year storm Dear Mr. Kashman, On behalf of Asherwood Carmel, LLC, we would like to request a waiver to Stormwater Technical Standard Section 302.06 (1.) requiring the detention facility shall be designed in such a manor that a minimum of 90% of the maximum volume of water stored and subsequently released at the design release rate shall not result in a storage duration in excess of 48 hours from the start of the storm unless additional storms occur within the period. In other words, the design shall ensure that a minimum 90% of the original detention capacity is restored within 48 hours from the start of the design 100-year storm. The storm design for this project utilizes an existing pond on the project site with a larger offsite area entering the site than onsite acreage. The proposed design also accepts onsite watershed from an existing pond in the northeast corner. Due to the limited release rates with the depressional storage analysis of the existing pond, this standard cannot be met without permitting greater release rates. The downstream system also throttles this system as the “Deefield Legal Drain” is inadequately sized for the total watershed draining to the drain. Therefore, we respectfully request a waiver from this requirement to restore 90% of the volume within a 48 hour time frame from start of 100 year storm. Thank you. Regards, Kimley-Horn Brett A. Huff Associate Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. October 15, 2024 City of Carmel Engineering Department One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attention: Jeremy Kashman Re: Asherwood South Waiver Request on the maximum swale length Dear Mr. Kashman, On behalf of Asherwood Carmel, LLC, we would like to request a waiver to Stormwater Technical Standard Section 303.05 (8.) requiring the maximum length of a rear and side lot swale before reaching any inlet shall not exceed 300 feet or convey water from more than 3 residential lots, whichever is shorter. The swale of question is located on the south side of lots 44 and 45. This swale crosses two residential lots and approaches 475 feet. With the redirection of the legal drain in this area, and dealing with the existing legal drain, it is difficult to route an inlet in order to meet this standard. This swale will only be collecting minimal flows from the rear side of the future homesites. Therefore, we respectfully request a waiver from this requirement to increase the maximum swale length from 300 feet to 475 feet. Thank you. Regards, Kimley-Horn Brett A. Huff Associate Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. th kimley-horn.com 500 East 96 Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 317 218 9560 October 15, 2024 City of Carmel Engineering Department One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attention: Jeremy Kashman Re: Asherwood South Waiver Request on the need for SSD under swales Dear Mr. Kashman, On behalf of Asherwood Carmel, LLC, we would like to request a waiver to Stormwater Technical Standard Section 302.08 (1.) requiring that all swales with less than a 1% bottom slope be required to install subsurface drains. The swales of question are located on the west side of lot 43 and the north side of lots 42 and 43. There is an existing swale on the north line of lots 42 and 43. The developer would prefer to keep a portion of this existing swale (105 L.F.) undisturbed. As we are requesting to leave this area undisturbed, the swale on the west side of lot 43 does not have an adequate outfall for SSD. The west swale’s slope has been increased to the maximum it can be (1.31%) while still considering existing grades and emergency flood routing. The existing swale on the north side of lots 42 and 43 has an average existing slope of 1.54%. Therefore, we respectfully request a waiver from this requirement to exclude the need for SSD under these two swales. Thank you. Regards, Kimley-Horn Brett A. Huff Associate Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. th kimley-horn.com 500 East 96 Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 317 218 9560 From:Conn, Angelina V To:Butler, Bric Subject:Fw: PZ-2024-00022 SP - Asherwood South Submittal Date:Wednesday, February 14, 2024 3:48:57 PM Bric - please add this correspondence to Laserfiche. Thank you. From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2024 3:45 PM To: Conn, Angelina V <aconn@carmel.in.gov>; Hohlt, William G <whohlt@carmel.in.gov>; Bill Oldham <william.oldham@duke-energy.com>; Brian Wente <bw1917@att.com>; Chad.R.Miller@centerpointenergy.com <Chad.R.Miller@centerpointenergy.com>; Chris Kehl <ckehl@citizensenergygroup.com>; Damon Davers <damon.davers@duke-energy.com>; Dan Davenport (dan.davenport@aes.com) <dan.davenport@aes.com>; Mindham, Daren <dmindham@carmel.in.gov>; Huffman, David <dhuffman@carmel.in.gov>; david.lucas@hamiltoncounty.in.gov <david.lucas@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; McCoy, David W <dmccoy@carmel.in.gov>; Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov>; Strong, David C <dstrong@carmel.in.gov>; Duffy, John M <JDuffy@carmel.in.gov>; Earl Small, Jr <earl_small@cable.comcast.com>; Ellison, Christopher M <CEllison@carmel.in.gov>; Russell, Eric C <erussell@carmel.in.gov>; ginger.davis@hamiltoncounty.in.gov <ginger.davis@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Herrington, Jessi N <Jessi.Herrington@duke-energy.com>; jason.lemaster@hamiltoncounty.in.gov <jason.lemaster@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Jeffrey Jarrett <Jeffery.R.Jarrett@usps.gov>; Barlow, James C <jbarlow@carmel.in.gov>; Blanchard, Jim E <jblanchard@carmel.in.gov>; Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Kyle Miller (kyle.miller1@charter.com) <kyle.miller1@charter.com>; cksmith@buckeye.com <cksmith@buckeye.com>; Larry Beard <larry.beard@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Lisa Dalton <lisa.v.dalton@usps.gov>; Lopez, Alexia K <alopez@carmel.in.gov>; Marc Hill <Marc.Hill@metronetinc.com>; Meri Seedorf (meri.seedorf@charter.com) <meri.seedorf@charter.com>; Klitzing, Michael <mklitzing@carmelclayparks.com>; Hendricks, Mike <mhendricks@carmel.in.gov>; Sheeks, Mike <msheeks@carmel.in.gov>; Murt, Ryan <rmurt@carmel.in.gov>; Keesling, Rachel M <rkeesling@carmel.in.gov>; Randall Brown (randall.e.brown@usps.gov) <randall.e.brown@usps.gov>; Reece Heilers (reece.heilers@duke-energy.com) <reece.heilers@duke-energy.com>; Rodney Johnson (rodney.johnson@aes.com) <rodney.johnson@aes.com>; Ron Farrand (rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us) <rfarrand@ccs.k12.in.us>; Ryan Daugherty <ryan.daugherty@duke-energy.com>; Ryan Hartman (ryan.hartman@trico.eco) <ryan.hartman@trico.eco>; Jellison, Ryan D <rjellison@carmel.in.gov>; Ryan Lonberger <ryan.lonberger@duke-energy.com>; Samuel Clark <samuel.clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Steve Creech (steve.creech@charter.com) <steve.creech@charter.com>; Stewart, Jason J <jjstewart@carmel.in.gov>; Anderson, Teresa K <tanderson@carmel.in.gov>; Krueskamp, Theresa A <tkrueskamp@carmel.in.gov>; Todd Fenoglio <tfenogli@ccs.k12.in.us>; Tom Wroblewski (tom.wroblewski@aes.com) <tom.wroblewski@aes.com>; Travis Krick (travis.krick@duke- energy.com) <travis.krick@duke-energy.com>; Troy Yackle <troy.yackle@energytransfer.com>; Wendy Noble (wendy.noble@att.com) <wendy.noble@att.com>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net> Subject: PZ-2024-00022 SP - Asherwood South Submittal All, This email is following up the submittal on ProjectDox from yesterday. At the link below you can find pdf versions of what was submitted for those who do not use ProjectDox. If anybody would like hard copies or CAD files sent over, please respond to me only and we can send those over. Ryan – You will see the TriCO application at the link below. Hard copies are being shipped to your office. Sam Clark / Steve Cash – Hard copies are being sent to your office for review. Files: https://kimley-horn.securevdr.com/public/share/web-s7960c4ccebd74028849f2933787891fd Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For 1 Bakker, Gavinn From:Huff, Brett Sent:Tuesday, July 2, 2024 7:59 AM To:Bakker, Gavinn Subject:FW: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Coorespondence Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2024 1:20 PM To: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov>; Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Yes, this makes sense. Thank you, Mark. We don’t have an issue with the proposed changes since there aren’t existing sidewalks to connect into and you’re providing pedestrian accessibility around the gate. Please let David or me know if you need anything else. And, please continue to respond to review comments in ProjectDox, as well as upload revised plans. Thank you. Sincerely, Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator Carmel Planning/Zoning Division – DOCS 1 Civic Sq., 3rd Flr., Carmel, IN 46202 O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com From: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 4:00 PM To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Angie I moved the ADA ramps so I think we will be ok on the ADAs. Not sure if it is perfect, but think it is our best location. We should be able to manage around them. As far as the detail goes, our walk will empty out onto the extension of Royalton that is just west of our gate. It will still be on our property as we are trying to not encroach onto the existing road and property in Deerfield. I see our curb on south side abutting the curb on Royalton. We would have a ramp down through a depressed curb. Does that make sense?? 2 Mark Gradison Gradison Design Build 6330 East 75th Street, Suite 156 Indianapolis, IN 46250 317.506.1037 Mobile mgradison@gradison.net www.gradisonbuilding.com www.gradisonlanddevelopment.com From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 2:32 PM To: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: Re: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Thank you, Mark - So, you do not anticipate the future driveways on Lots 43, 44, or 45 to conflict with any of the sidewalk ADA ramps (or street trees)? And, will the westernmost ADA ramp just empty out onto the Royalton Drive street pavement? Please provide more design details on that. Thanks again. Sincerely, Angie Conn, AICP | Planning Administrator Carmel Planning & Zoning Dept. - DOCS 3rd Flr., 1 Civic Sq., Carmel, IN 46032 O: 317-571-2417 | W: carmeldocs.com From: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 11:12 AM To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Sorry about that. Thought I had it as an attachment but it was a snip. 3 Mark Gradison Gradison Design Build 6330 East 75th Street, Suite 156 Indianapolis, IN 46250 317.506.1037 Mobile mgradison@gradison.net www.gradisonbuilding.com www.gradisonlanddevelopment.com 4 From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:54 AM To: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: Re: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Good morning, Mark - I only see the snippet from Brett's original email. And, where will the driveway go for the house that will be built just to the south? Sincerely, Angie Conn, AICP | Planning Administrator Carmel Planning & Zoning Dept. - DOCS 3rd Flr., 1 Civic Sq., Carmel, IN 46032 O: 317-571-2417 | W: carmeldocs.com From: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 9:39 AM To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Angie Here is a snippet of the gate area. The idea is to have a 20’ access gate to Royalton in order to save the large grove of pine trees on northside of our road. Our proposal is to not run the sidewalk on the north side of the road for that reason. We would extend the south side walk to the gate area and allow for a handicap ramp and access to the west of the gate thus allowing a free flow for foot traffic. As we mentioned, there are no walks in the Deerfield subdivision so there is no way for us to connect anywhere at this time. Let me know if you have any questions. 5 Thanks Mark Gradison Gradison Design Build 6330 East 75th Street, Suite 156 Indianapolis, IN 46250 317.506.1037 Mobile mgradison@gradison.net www.gradisonbuilding.com www.gradisonlanddevelopment.com From: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 10:31 AM To: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Littlejohn, David W <dlittlejohn@carmel.in.gov> Subject: Re: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Okay, thank you Brett. Sincerely, Angie Conn, AICP | Planning Administrator Carmel Planning & Zoning Dept. - DOCS 3rd Flr., 1 Civic Sq., Carmel, IN 46032 6 O: 317-571-2417 | W: carmeldocs.com From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Friday, June 7, 2024 9:58 AM To: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Conn, Angelina V <aconn@carmel.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net> Subject: Asherwood South Emergency Access Connection Alex, See below with he reduced road width with curb on southside only that we proposed. Please advise once you talk with Jeremy Angie, Mark will get you an updated exhibit showing the proposed driveway so you can discuss this with David Littlejohn. We will handle coordinating with the fire dept. 7 Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For 1 Bakker, Gavinn From:Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent:Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:35 AM To:Huff, Brett; Bakker, Gavinn; Kenton Ward Subject:RE: Asherwood South Hi Brett. Isn’t the 6 inch SSD in Deerfield tied into that existing regulated drain? That is why we were wanting the drain to be reconstructed rather than vacated. If that SSD is currently tied into the regulated drain, we have to perpetuate that rather than have it flow into a private system. I guess the main question is what would happen to that Deerfield SSD if the drain was vacated? From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 2:58 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Sam, I didn’t see that you attached an annotated exhibit as you described below. Only our exhibit was attached. However, we seem to not be on the same page here. When we had our meeting at your office we described that the legal drain we were vacating was only the furthest upstream portion of the drain and that portion of the drain was not taking on any more water from anything beyond our site. Our proposed development would now accept any of this said watershed into our private storm system. So there is no need to relocate any legal drain pipe. Just abandoning the furthest upstream portion of it as shown hatched in red on this exhibit. Please confirm if you agree this is only a vacation and not a relocation. Thanks. Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 10:26 AM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavinn. Thanks for the clarification. We will not require the drain (shown as green in the exhibit) outletting into the pond to be within a regulated drain easement but we will require the existing regulated drain to be relocated rather than vacated if it is the developers desire to free up the space it currently occupies. I have attached an annotated exhibit showing what would most likely be your best option. With the drain relocated to the perimeter, this will still allow us to handle whatever amount of upstream there is. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 2 From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 8:12 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South See the attached exhibit. I just want to reiterate that the existing 36” is a separate system from the legal drain. We will be vacating the legal drain to the next downstream structure as shown with the red hatching. Does the 36” need to be platted within an RDE? This 36” takes the offsite from Deerfield to the pond within the project. This, again, is separate from the legal drain. We will be relocating the 36” pipe north closer to the road so it can continue what it does today. Does this relocated 36” pipe need to be within an RDE? If so, we will follow the guidelines in Sam message below. We would prefer for this pond and drainage system to be private instead of county regulated. Please Advise. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 3:13 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavinn. So after speaking with Kent, He has clarified that if the existing regulated drain is to be removed, then the new drain as well as the detention facility will need to be county regulated. The internal infrastructure for the subdivision can be private but we will need a letter from Carmel stating that they are ok with those conditions. Thanks From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 8:48 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Sam, can you give me a quick call today when you’re free for 10 minutes? Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 3:28 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavin. We would be fine with Deerfield outletting into the drain. Our issue is when a regulated drain flows into a private drain which doesn’t seem to be occurring with this project if the proposed 36” drain is to be regulated. From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 11:45 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Sam, Just so we are understanding this correctly, we are to vacate the existing legal drain up until the next downstream structure (As shown) and the county does NOT want the new 36” pipe taking the Deerfield stormwater to be within an RDE? You had mentioned a reconstruction of legal drain in your email so I just wanted to clear that up. Please advise. We can provide calcs with a 4” orifice. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 4 Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 11:18 AM To: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Brett. I spoke with Kent and we have established that the hydraulics are fine by us as long as the reasoning is that the 10 year cannot be met without sizing the orifice to be smaller than what is allowed. Please add the hypothetical calcs for the 4 inch orifice to the drainage report if you haven’t already. As for the reconstruction/vacation question, our issue is with a regulated drain outletting into a private development, not the other way around so we will be requiring a reconstruction with this one. Let me know if you have any questions about the approval process. Thanks From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:50 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: Asherwood South 5 Kent/Sam, Would you mind sharing a few dates and times of your soonest availability that we could come in for maybe a 30 minute meeting? We’d like to go over the drainage patterns pre and post for this site. Hoping you might have some availability before 4/16 as Mark and I will be out for a week after that. Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 1 Bakker, Gavinn From:Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent:Friday, September 6, 2024 12:06 PM To:Bakker, Gavinn; Surveyor Cc:Huff, Brett Subject:RE: Asherwood South Thanks Gavinn. This should be approved at the second drainage board meeting this month. Will keep you posted. From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 11:36 AM To: Surveyor <surveyor@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Pam, The client is dropping off the checks later today. We will have them shipped to your office today/tomorrow. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Surveyor <surveyor@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2024 10:48 AM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Cc: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: FW: Asherwood South From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Monday, August 26, 2024 11:22 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. You don't often get email from surveyor@hamiltoncounty.in.gov. Learn why this is important 2 Gavinn, There is a $100.00 permit fee plus a $25.00 recording that must be made before I can process this non-enforcement. I cannot take these fees over the phone since one check goes to the Recorder’s office. Please make the $100.00 permit fee made out to the Hamilton County Treasurer and the 2 nd check for $25.00 made out to the Hamilton County Recorder. Thanks Pam Louks Sam, See the attached requested files. Let me know if you have any comments on the Engineer’s Estimate prior to the client ordering bonds. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2024 11:36 AM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavinn. Thanks for that phonecall. Now that it is understood that the drain will need to be reconstructed, you will need the following procedural items: -petition for reconstruction (52.5) -Subdivision Nonenforcement -Engineer’s estimate -Construction bond worth 120% of the cost of reconstruction Keep in mind the applicant will need to be the developer. I will get started on review of the plans and writing of the drainage board report. Thanks From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2024 2:32 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 3 Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Sam, See the updated files at the link below. Please give me a call when you have time, and I can provide you with a refresher on this. We will also be sending hard copies to your office. Files: https://kimley-horn.securevdr.com/d-s3869a57685b84e02a877573fbd6d6b08 Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:35 AM To: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Brett. Isn’t the 6 inch SSD in Deerfield tied into that existing regulated drain? That is why we were wanting the drain to be reconstructed rather than vacated. If that SSD is currently tied into the regulated drain, we have to perpetuate that rather than have it flow into a private system. I guess the main question is what would happen to that Deerfield SSD if the drain was vacated? From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2024 2:58 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Sam, I didn’t see that you attached an annotated exhibit as you described below. Only our exhibit was attached. However, we seem to not be on the same page here. When we had our meeting at your office we described that the legal drain we were vacating was only the furthest upstream portion of the drain and that portion of the drain was not taking on any more water from anything beyond our site. Our proposed development would now accept any of this said watershed into our private storm system. So there is no need to relocate any legal drain pipe. Just abandoning CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 4 the furthest upstream portion of it as shown hatched in red on this exhibit. Please confirm if you agree this is only a vacation and not a relocation. Thanks. Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Thursday, April 25, 2024 10:26 AM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavinn. Thanks for the clarification. We will not require the drain (shown as green in the exhibit) outletting into the pond to be within a regulated drain easement but we will require the existing regulated drain to be relocated rather than vacated if it is the developers desire to free up the space it currently occupies. I have attached an annotated exhibit showing what would most likely be your best option. With the drain relocated to the perimeter, this will still allow us to handle whatever amount of upstream there is. From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2024 8:12 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South See the attached exhibit. I just want to reiterate that the existing 36” is a separate system from the legal drain. We will be vacating the legal drain to the next downstream structure as shown with the red hatching. Does the 36” need to be platted within an RDE? This 36” takes the offsite from Deerfield to the pond within the project. This, again, is separate from the legal drain. We will be relocating the 36” pipe north closer to the road so it can continue what it does today. Does this relocated 36” pipe need to be within an RDE? If so, we will follow the guidelines in Sam message below. We would prefer for this pond and drainage system to be private instead of county regulated. Please Advise. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 5 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Monday, April 15, 2024 3:13 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavinn. So after speaking with Kent, He has clarified that if the existing regulated drain is to be removed, then the new drain as well as the detention facility will need to be county regulated. The internal infrastructure for the subdivision can be private but we will need a letter from Carmel stating that they are ok with those conditions. Thanks From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2024 8:48 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Sam, can you give me a quick call today when you’re free for 10 minutes? Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2024 3:28 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Hi Gavin. We would be fine with Deerfield outletting into the drain. Our issue is when a regulated drain flows into a private drain which doesn’t seem to be occurring with this project if the proposed 36” drain is to be regulated. From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 11:45 AM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 6 Sam, Just so we are understanding this correctly, we are to vacate the existing legal drain up until the next downstream structure (As shown) and the county does NOT want the new 36” pipe taking the Deerfield stormwater to be within an RDE? You had mentioned a reconstruction of legal drain in your email so I just wanted to clear that up. Please advise. We can provide calcs with a 4” orifice. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 9, 2024 11:18 AM To: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 7 Hi Brett. I spoke with Kent and we have established that the hydraulics are fine by us as long as the reasoning is that the 10 year cannot be met without sizing the orifice to be smaller than what is allowed. Please add the hypothetical calcs for the 4 inch orifice to the drainage report if you haven’t already. As for the reconstruction/vacation question, our issue is with a regulated drain outletting into a private development, not the other way around so we will be requiring a reconstruction with this one. Let me know if you have any questions about the approval process. Thanks From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:50 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: Asherwood South Kent/Sam, Would you mind sharing a few dates and times of your soonest availability that we could come in for maybe a 30 minute meeting? We’d like to go over the drainage patterns pre and post for this site. Hoping you might have some availability before 4/16 as Mark and I will be out for a week after that. Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. 8 The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. 1 Bakker, Gavinn From:Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov> Sent:Monday, September 30, 2024 12:32 PM To:Bakker, Gavinn Cc:Mark Gradison; Huff, Brett; Thomas, John G; Justen Hochstetler; Willie Hall Subject:RE: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Gavinn, Thank you for these revisions. When the plans are submiƩed, please provide the following: 1. A cross-secƟon of the swale that shows the limits of the naƟve vegetaƟon and locaƟon of “no mow, no spray” signage. 2. A detail for the “no mow, no spray” signage. 3. A rock chute should be installed where the swale meets the pond to avoid erosion. Please provide a detail for this as well. 4. Please clarify which planƟng list will be used. There are several “stormwater wetland” mixes included on C334 but we will need to know which one is being proposed. Please let me know if you have any ques Ɵons about these comments. Sincerely, Alex Jordan, CPESC Plan Review Coordinator City of Carmel Engineering Department (317) 571-2305 ajordan@carmel.in.gov From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 10:52 AM To: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Justen Hochstetler <jhochstetler@crossroadengineers.com>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Alex, Thank you for the feedback. For the vegetated swale, can you please confirm if the attached plan sheets have enough information for approval? We have not shown a vegetated swale in Carmel before. We will remove pipe run 620-619 and directly discharge the swale into the pond. There is no retaining wall in this area. The swale cuts over the existing legal drain, but still maintains 2.0’+ of cover over the existing pipe. O&M Manual will be updated with a revised BMP location map and will include pages also included on sheet C334. 2 Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 3:29 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Justen Hochstetler <jhochstetler@crossroadengineers.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Good aŌernoon, We looked through the revised plans and waiver request with the City Engineer and provided our responses to each below: 1. We will not support the waiver request to remove the water quality aspect of this storm run. If the water quality unit will not be installed, a vegetated swale BMP or alterna Ɵve will need to be included prior to the storm run discharging into the pond. 2. We will only support the proposed swale length exceeding the maximum allowable length if a vegetated swale BMP is installed prior to the storm run discharging into the pond. 3. Thank you for revising the berm. This should work for the civil plan approval but we will take a close look at these lots when building permits are submiƩed to ensure that the drainage is acceptable. 4. Thank you for including this swale to take drainage from the lot into the system. 5. We will support the waiver to exclude the SSD on lots 42 and 43 as requested. Please let us know if you have any quesƟons. Sincerely, Alex Jordan, CPESC Plan Review Coordinator City of Carmel Engineering Department (317) 571-2305 ajordan@carmel.in.gov From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 10:40 AM To: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Good Morning Alex/Willie, 3 As requested, please see the updated files per comments at the link below. Let me know if you need anything else for your review. I will update the drainage report for this project once we get your general approval of the revised grading. The storm profile 604-600 is properly sized in these plans. Below are some bullet points and responses from our 8-8 meeting as a refresher. - STR. 620 WQ unit o We are requesting a variance for this standard. Variance included at the link below. - Max length of swale o We are requesting a variance for this standard. Variance included at the link below. - Grading for lots 44 & 45. o The berm has been split into two separate smaller berms each entirely located on either lot 44 or 45. There is a lower side yard that the future homes can grade into, similar to the side yards of lots 46 & 47. - West swale for lot 44. o A swale has been added in a 10’ D.E. drainage to structure 610. This was to create a defined channel so the future home would not directly discharge to the neighbor to the west. - Lots 42 & 43. o We have gotten additional topo done for the existing swale on the north side of these lots. We have revised the proposed plan accordingly to match this new data. There is 105 L.F. of existing swale that the developer would prefer to stay existing. The average slope in that segment is 1.54%. o We are requesting a variance for not having SSD under the swales(West swale of lot 43 & Existing swale). The variance is included at the link below. Files: https://kimley-horn.securevdr.com/d-s1aaaf0a15d314f91b6efdfb875744bb8 Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From:Bakker, Gavinn To:Jordan, Alex Cc:Mark Gradison; Huff, Brett; Thomas, John G; Justen Hochstetler; Willie Hall Subject:RE: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Attachments:C334 EROSION CONTROL SPECS AND DETAILS.pdf PLAT-PLAT 1-2.pdf C200 SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN.pdf C320 PERM EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Alex, Thank you for the feedback. For the vegetated swale, can you please confirm if the attached plan sheets have enough information for approval? We have not shown a vegetated swale in Carmel before. We will remove pipe run 620-619 and directly discharge the swale into the pond. There is no retaining wall in this area. The swale cuts over the existing legal drain, but still maintains 2.0’+ of cover over the existing pipe. O&M Manual will be updated with a revised BMP location map and will include pages also included on sheet C334. Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For From: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov> Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2024 3:29 PM To: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Justen Hochstetler <jhochstetler@crossroadengineers.com> Subject: RE: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Good afternoon, We looked through the revised plans and waiver request with the City Engineer and provided our responses to each below: 1. We will not support the waiver request to remove the water quality aspect of this storm run. If the water quality unit will not be installed, a vegetated swale BMP or alternative will need to be included prior to the storm run discharging into the pond. 2. We will only support the proposed swale length exceeding the maximum allowable length if a vegetated swale BMP is installed prior to the storm run discharging into the pond. 3. Thank you for revising the berm. This should work for the civil plan approval but we will take a close look at these lots when building permits are submitted to ensure that the drainage is acceptable. 4. Thank you for including this swale to take drainage from the lot into the system. 5. We will support the waiver to exclude the SSD on lots 42 and 43 as requested. Please let us know if you have any questions. Sincerely, Alex Jordan, CPESC Plan Review Coordinator City of Carmel Engineering Department (317) 571-2305 ajordan@carmel.in.gov From: Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2024 10:40 AM To: Jordan, Alex <ajordan@carmel.in.gov>; Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Subject: Asherwood South Email Resubmittal Good Morning Alex/Willie, As requested, please see the updated files per comments at the link below. Let me know if you need anything else for your review. I will update the drainage report for this project once we get your general approval of the revised grading. The storm profile 604-600 is properly sized in these plans. Below are some bullet points and responses from our 8-8 meeting as a refresher. STR. 620 WQ unit We are requesting a variance for this standard. Variance included at the link below. Max length of swale We are requesting a variance for this standard. Variance included at the link below. Grading for lots 44 & 45. The berm has been split into two separate smaller berms each entirely located on either lot 44 or 45. There is a lower side yard that the future homes can grade into, similar to the side yards of lots 46 & 47. West swale for lot 44. A swale has been added in a 10’ D.E. drainage to structure 610. This was to create a defined channel so the future home would not directly discharge to the neighbor to the west. Lots 42 & 43. We have gotten additional topo done for the existing swale on the north side of these lots. We have revised the proposed plan accordingly to match this new data. There is 105 L.F. of existing swale that the developer would prefer to stay existing. The average slope in that segment is 1.54%. We are requesting a variance for not having SSD under the swales(West swale of lot 43 & Existing swale). The variance is included at the link below. Files: https://kimley-horn.securevdr.com/d-s1aaaf0a15d314f91b6efdfb875744bb8 Best, Gavinn Bakker | Development Services Analyst Kimley-Horn | 500 East 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: 317 238 3032 Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | Instagram | Kimley-Horn.com Celebrating 17 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For 1 Bakker, Gavinn From:Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Sent:Tuesday, April 9, 2024 11:18 AM To:Huff, Brett; Kenton Ward Cc:Mark Gradison; Bakker, Gavinn Subject:RE: Asherwood South Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed Hi Brett. I spoke with Kent and we have established that the hydraulics are fine by us as long as the reasoning is that the 10 year cannot be met without sizing the orifice to be smaller than what is allowed. Please add the hypothetical calcs for the 4 inch orifice to the drainage report if you haven’t already. As for the reconstruction/vacation question, our issue is with a regulated drain outletting into a private development, not the other way around so we will be requiring a reconstruction with this one. Let me know if you have any questions about the approval process. Thanks From: Huff, Brett <Brett.Huff@kimley-horn.com> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2024 3:50 PM To: Samuel Clark <Samuel.Clark@hamiltoncounty.in.gov>; Kenton Ward <Kenton.Ward@hamiltoncounty.in.gov> Cc: Mark Gradison <mgradison@gradison.net>; Bakker, Gavinn <Gavinn.Bakker@kimley-horn.com> Subject: Asherwood South Kent/Sam, Would you mind sharing a few dates and times of your soonest availability that we could come in for maybe a 30 minute meeting? We’d like to go over the drainage patterns pre and post for this site. Hoping you might have some availability before 4/16 as Mark and I will be out for a week after that. Brett Huff Kimley-Horn | 500 E. 96th Street, Suite 300, Indianapolis, IN 46240 Direct: (317) 912-4129 | Mobile: (317) 903-7787 | Main: (317) 218-9560 | www.kimley-horn.com Connect with us: Twitter | LinkedIn | Facebook | YouTube Celebrating 16 years as one of FORTUNE’s 100 Best Companies to Work For The information in this email may contain confidential information and is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee(s). It must not be disclosed to any person(s) without authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to, and must not disclose, copy, distribute, or retain this message or any part of it. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.