HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 03-07-06
.~
u
u
CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION
SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE
DEPARTMENT REPORT
March 7, 2006
,:,:",-~;"~,7<':::~>-",:_,;__ :..:.,._::.:t,._'",'_ ._,' '".'_-.~~~~
~k~t;N ,~JSliQtown Village>PIJll --ii'
The applicant seeks to rezone 18.82 acres from Il/Industrail to PUD for the purpose of
creating mixed use development.
The site is located at 510 Third Avenue SW and is zoned Il/Industrial.
Filed by Lawrence Kemper of Nelson and Frankenberger for Centex Homes.
The applicant is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development to allow the construction of 227
residential units (attached townhome and condo flats) and 13,000 sq. ft. of retail. Please see the original
informational packet prepared by the applicant for an overview of this rezone. The public hearing for
this item was held at the February 21,2006 Plan Commission meeting.
Two items that staff would like to call out at this stage of the process include:
1. Petitioner must commit to required upgrades to any rights of way identified on the
thoroughfare plan that are adjacent to or on the interior of this project. These upgrades can
be constructed or funded (for future construction). The petitioner is required to coordinate
with City Engineering to determine these improvements (or cost thereof), and commit to
construction or funding prior to approval. This commitment must be recorded.
2. The proposed realignment of 3rd and 4th avenues will require the relocation of power lines.
Given the proposed building locations to the edge of the right of way (as desired) this will
require to wires to be buried. This is the responsibility of the developer, not the City.
Petitioner should bring the following information to the committee meeting:
1. Updates on any PUD ordinance revisions and edits that are in response to staff s, the
public's, and the Plan Commission's concerns and/or suggestions.
2. Update on landscape plan approval.
3. Update on all outstanding Carmel Engineering issues. Petitioner has not responded to TAC
comments dated Jan. 6, 2006.
4. Full site plan that is legible and clearly calls out the areas, buildings, and boundaries of this
proposal. The cropped version of your master plan is not acceptable. This map should show
this proposal only within the current existing context.
5. A context map and a complete master plan for the entire envisioned "master plan".
6. Detailed architectural standards for all buildings/areas. These standards must include
roofline, materials, unit and tenant sizes, residential products, etc.
7. Details on proposed traffic flow in and around the project.
The Department recommends that the Special Studies Committee continue the request to the
March 30th meeting to allow additional time for the petitioner to resolve all outstanding issues.
..
o
(,;)
Page 1 of 1
.,.'
DeVore, Laura B
From: Griffin, Matt L
Friday, March 03, 20061 :45 AM
'DCoots@chwlaw.com'; 'thegreatframeup@ameritech.net'; 'Ann Walker'; 'Calderon, Joseph';
'Charlie Frankenberger'; 'Jim Shinaver'; 'Larry Kemper'; Keeling, Adrienne M; 'Kevin J. Roberts';
'Reis, Paul'; 'jisaacs@centexhomes.com'; jtalbot@dreeshomes.com;
'kduncan@indianalanddevelopment.com'; 'bminteriors49@aol.com'
Cc: DeVore, Laura B; Hancock, Ramona B; Littlejohn, David W
Subject: March 7, 2006 Special Studies Committee Reports
Sent:
To:
Please see attached reports.
You will need to flip through to find your specific reports - they are all in one file.
As always, contact me with any questions.
Matthew L. Griffin, AICP
Planning Administrator
Department of Community Services
City of Carmel
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
phone: 317.571.2417
fax: 317.663.3208
email: mariffin@carmel.in.aov
31712006