Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.

No preview available

The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFinal TOA (Traffic Study) with appendix TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS PROPOSED “JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE” DEVELOPMENT CARMEL, INDIANA ________________________________________________ PREPARED FOR _______________________________________________ MARCH 2024 8 3 6 5 K e y s t o n e C r o s s i n g , S u i t e 2 0 1 I n d i a n a p o l i s , I N 4 6 2 4 0 P h o n e : ( 3 1 7 ) 2 0 2 - 0 8 6 4 F a x : ( 3 1 7 ) 2 0 2 - 0 9 0 8 JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA I COPYRIGHT This analysis and the ideas, designs, concepts, and data contained herein are the exclusive intellectual property of A&F Engineering Co., LLC and are not to be used or reproduced in whole or in part, without the written consent of A&F Engineering Co., LLC. 2024, A&F Engineering Co., LLC JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA II TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................................... II LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................................... II CERTIFICATION ............................................................................................................................................................ III INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................................................. 1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 SCOPE OF WORK ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................................................... 2 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 TABLE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE ABUTTING STREET SYSTEM ................................................................................... 2 GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ................................................................................... 5 TABLE 2 – TOTAL GENERATED TRIPS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................... 5 PASS-BY & INTERNAL TRIPS .......................................................................................................................................... 5 TABLE 3 –PASS-BY AND INTERNAL TRIP REDUCTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................... 6 ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF GENERATED TRIPS ............................................................................................... 6 GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM ...................................................................................................... 7 TURN LANE ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 7 TABLE 4 – TURN LANE WARRANT RESULTS ............................................................................................................. 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ................................................................................................................................................... 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS SCENARIOS ................................................................................................................................ 10 TABLE 5 – LOS SUMMARY: 116TH ST & SPRING MILL ROAD .................................................................................. 10 TABLE 6 – LOS SUMMARY: SPRING MILL ROAD & HAMLET ROAD ........................................................................ 11 TABLE 7 – LOS SUMMARY: 116TH STREET & TEMPLE DRIVE/PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE ....................................... 11 TABLE 8 – LOS SUMMARY: SPRING MILL ROAD & PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE ....................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................................................ 11 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1: AREA MAP .................................................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 2: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES ........................................................................................................................ 4 FIGURE 3: TOTAL GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT .................................................... 8 FIGURE 4: SUM OF EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FROM PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................................................................................... 9 JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA III CERTIFICATION I certify that this TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS has been prepared by me and under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of traffic and transportation engineering. A&F ENGINEERING CO., LLC March 21, 2024 Steven J. Fehribach, P.E. Indiana Registration #60890237 Trevor Reich, E.I. Traffic Engineer JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 1 INTRODUCTION This TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS, prepared at the request of the City of Carmel, on behalf of Air Alchemist, is for a proposed mixed-use development known as “Jackson Grant Village” that will be located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 116th Street & Spring Mill Road in Carmel, Indiana. PURPOSE The purpose of this analysis is to determine what impact traffic generated by the proposed development will have on the existing adjacent roadway system. This analysis will identify any existing roadway deficiencies or ones that may occur when this site is developed. Conclusions will be reached that will determine if the roadway system can accommodate the anticipated traffic volumes or will determine the modifications that will be required to the system if there are identified deficiencies. Recommendations will be made that will address the conclusions resulting from this analysis. These recommendations will address feasible roadway system improvements to provide safe ingress and egress, to and from the proposed development, with minimal interference to traffic on the public street system. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work for this analysis is as follows: First, obtain manual turning movement counts at the intersection of 116th Street & Spring Mill Road and Spring Mill Road & Hamlet Drive. These counts will be made between the hours of 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM. Second, estimate the number of peak hour trips that will be generated by Jackson Grant Village. Third, assign and distribute the generated traffic from the proposed development to the study intersections. Fourth, prepare a capacity analysis, level of service analysis, and turn lane analysis for each of the following scenarios: Scenario 1: Existing Traffic Volumes – Based on existing traffic volumes and existing intersection conditions. Scenario 2: Proposed Development – Based on the sum of existing traffic volumes and generated traffic volumes from the proposed development. JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 2 Fifth, prepare recommendations for the roadway cross sections that will be needed to accommodate the total traffic volumes once the proposed development is constructed. Finally, prepare a TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS documenting all data, analyses, conclusions, and recommendations to provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic into and out of the site. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The subject site is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 116th Street & Spring Mill Road in Carmel, Indiana. The proposed development will consist of a 160-student day care center, 55 single-family attached homes, 19 single-family detached homes, and 17,000 square feet of general retail. As proposed, the development will be served by a full access drive along 116th Street that will align with Temple Drive, a connection to the existing Hamlet Drive, and left- in/right-in/right-out access drive along Spring Mill Road. Figure 1 is an area map showing the location of the site. STUDY AREA The study area for this analysis has been defined to include the following intersections: • 116th Street & Spring Mill Road • Spring Mill Road & Hamlet Drive • 116th Street & Temple Drive/Proposed Access • Spring Mill Road & Proposed LI/RI/RO Access DESCRIPTION OF ABUTTING STREET SYSTEM The proposed development will be primarily served by 116th Street and Spring Mill Road. TABLE 1 – DESCRIPTION OF THE ABUTTING STREET SYSTEM STREET NAME NUMBER OF LANES SPEED LIMIT (MPH) FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION 116th Street 2/4 40 Minor Arterial Spring Mill Road 2/4 40 Major Collector EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUMES Manual weekday turning movement traffic volume counts were conducted by A&F Engineering between the hours of 6:30 AM to 8:30 AM, 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM, and 4:00 PM to 6:00 PM at the existing study intersections during a typical weekday in February 2024 under good weather conditions. The intersection count output summary sheets are included in the Appendix, and the AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes are shown on Figure 2. 3 CARMEL, INDIANA AIR ALCHEMIST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS AREA MAP FIGURE 1 CARMEL, INDIANA AIR ALCHEMIST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 4 VOLUMES EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE 2 (4 3 0 ) 1 5 1 (2 1 ) 1 6 (15) 19 (4) 0 42 9 ( 2 0 0 ) 0 ( 1 ) (2 8 0 ) 7 9 (1 9 9 ) 9 0 (85) 154 (23) 58 (593) 638 24 4 ( 9 5 ) 40 ( 3 0 ) 15 3 ( 7 6 ) (4 2 ) 4 1 77 (93) 46 (130) 411 (713) PEAK PM PEAK 7:30 - 8:30 4:30 - 5:30 AM PEAK PM PEAK 7:30 - 8:30 4:30 - 5:30 AM XX = A.M. PEAK HOUR (XX) = P.M. PEAK HOUR * = NEGLIGIBLE JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 5 GENERATED TRAFFIC VOLUMES FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT The estimate of newly generated traffic is a function of the development size and of the character of the land use. The ITE Trip Generation Manual 1 was used to calculate the number of trips that will be generated by the proposed development. This report is a compilation of trip data for various land uses as collected by transportation professionals throughout the United States to establish the average number of trips generated by those land uses. Table 2 is a summary of the peak hour trips that will be generated by the proposed development. TABLE 2 – TOTAL GENERATED TRIPS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION GENERATED TRIPS LAND USE ITE CODE SIZE AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR ENTER EXIT ENTER EXIT Day Care Center 565 160 Students 60 54 52 59 Single-Family Attached Housing 215 55 DU 6 17 17 12 Single-Family Detached Housing 210 19 DU 4 12 13 8 General Retail 822 17k SF 24 16 57 56 PASS-BY & INTERNAL TRIPS Pass-by trips are trips that are already in the existing traffic stream along the adjacent public roadway system that enter a site, utilize the site, and then return to the existing traffic stream. The day care center and general retail portions of the proposed development will generate a significant number of pass-by trips. Therefore, the pass-by trip procedures outlined within the ITE Trip Generation Handbook2 were used to estimate the number of pass-by trips generated by the proposed development. An internal trip results when a trip is made between two or more land uses without traversing the external public roadway system. A significant number of internal trips will be generated between the residential and general retail land uses during the PM peak hour. A summary of the pass-by and internal trip reductions are located in Table 3. 1 Trip Generation Manual, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Eleventh Edition, 2021. 2 Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2017. JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 6 TABLE 3 –PASS-BY AND INTERNAL TRIP REDUCTIONS FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT Development Information Generated Trips Land Use ITE Code Size AM Peak PM Peak Enter Exit Enter Exit Day Care Center 565 160 Students 60 54 52 59 Pass-By Trips 24 24 23 23 Non-Pass-By Trips 36 30 29 36 Single Family Attached Housing 215 55 DU 6 17 17 12 Internal Trips 0 0 8 5 Non-Pass-By Trips 6 17 9 7 Single Family Detached Housing 210 19 DU 4 12 13 8 Internal Trips 0 0 6 3 Non-Pass-By Trips 4 12 7 5 General Retail 822 17k SF 24 16 57 56 Internal Trips 0 0 8 14 Pass-By Trips 6 6 16 16 Non-Pass-By Trips 18 10 33 26 Total Trips 94 99 139 135 Total Internal Trips 0 0 22 22 Total Pass-By Trips 30 30 39 39 Total Non-Pass-By Trips 64 69 78 74 ASSIGNMENT AND DISTRIBUTION OF GENERATED TRIPS The study methodology used to determine the traffic volumes from the site that will be added to the street system is defined as follows: 1. The volume of traffic that will enter and exit the proposed development must be assigned to the access points and to the public street system. Using the traffic volume data collected for this analysis, traffic to and from the site development has been assigned to the proposed driveways and to the public street system that will be serving the site. 2. To determine the volumes of traffic that will be added to the public roadway system, the generated traffic must be distributed by direction to the public roadways at their intersection with the driveways. For the proposed development, the trip distribution was based on the location of the development, the existing traffic patterns, and the assignment of generated traffic. JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 7 GENERATED TRIPS ADDED TO THE STREET SYSTEM The generated traffic volumes that can be expected from the proposed development have been assigned to each of the study intersections. These volumes were determined based on the previously discussed trip generation data, assignment of generated traffic and distribution of generated traffic. The total peak hour generated traffic volumes from the proposed development are shown in Figure 3. Figure 4 shows the sum of existing traffic volumes and generated traffic volumes from the proposed development. TURN LANE ANALYSIS The generated peak hour traffic volumes were combined with the sum of the existing traffic volumes to determine if turn lanes would be warranted along 116th Street at the access drive location. This analysis was done in accordance with the INDOT Driveway Permit Manual3. The results are summarized in the following table. TABLE 4 – TURN LANE WARRANT RESULTS LOCATION LEFT-TURN LANE RIGHT-TURN LANE 116th St & Temple Drive/Proposed Access Drive ✔ ✘ ✔=Turn lane warranted; ✘=Turn lane not warranted It should be noted that the City of Carmel could require turn lane treatments at locations where turn lanes are not shown to be warranted based on local standards. The graphs that show the turn lane warrant criteria for each intersection are shown in the Appendix. 3 INDOT Driveway Permit Manual, Indiana Department of Transportation, 2018 CARMEL, INDIANA AIR ALCHEMIST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 8 DEVELOPMENT FROM PROPOSED TRAFFIC VOLUMES TOTAL GENERATED FIGURE 3 (- 8 ) - 1 (* ) * (*) 1 (21) 13 10 ( 1 3 ) 1 ( 1 ) (6 ) 5 (3 ) 1 (3) 2 (*) 1 (11) 12 5 ( 6 ) * ( * ) 32 ( 3 5 ) 31 (37) 11 (11) (- 8 ) - 1 (5 1 ) 3 8 (44) 44 -7 ( - 3 ) 18 ( 1 6 ) (* ) * (19) 17 (-12) -12 * ( * ) 14 ( 2 2 ) 27 ( 2 6 ) 20 (30) -8 (-16) XX = A.M. PEAK HOUR (XX) = P.M. PEAK HOUR * = NEGLIGIBLE CARMEL, INDIANA AIR ALCHEMIST TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS 9 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC VOLUMES FROM VOLUMES & TOTAL GENERATED SUM OF EXISTING TRAFFIC FIGURE 4 (4 2 2 ) 1 5 0 (2 1 ) 1 6 (15) 20 (25) 13 43 9 ( 2 1 3 ) 1 ( 2 ) (2 8 6 ) 8 4 (2 0 2 ) 9 1 (88) 156 (23) 59 (604) 650 24 9 ( 1 0 1 ) 40 ( 3 0 ) 18 5 ( 1 1 1 ) (4 2 ) 4 1 77 (93) 77 (167) 52 (724) (4 4 3 ) 1 6 6 (5 1 ) 3 8 (44) 44 41 1 ( 2 1 2 ) 18 ( 1 6 ) (* ) * (5 ) 5 (5) 5 (19) 17 (684) 833 * ( * ) 14 ( 2 2 ) 27 ( 2 6 ) (5 ) 5 5 (5) 20 (30) 528 (921) XX = A.M. PEAK HOUR (XX) = P.M. PEAK HOUR * = NEGLIGIBLE JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 10 CAPACITY ANALYSIS The "efficiency" of an intersection is based on its ability to accommodate the traffic volumes that approach the intersection. It is defined by the Level-of-Service (LOS) of the intersection. The LOS is determined by a series of calculations commonly called a "capacity analysis". Input data into a capacity analysis include traffic volumes, intersection geometry, and number and use of lanes. To determine the LOS at each of the study intersections, a capacity analysis has been made using the recognized computer program Synchro/SimTraffic4.This program allows intersections to be analyzed and optimized using the capacity calculation methods outlined within the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM 7th Edition)5. The following list shows the delays related to the levels of service for unsignalized intersections: Level of Service Control Delay (seconds/vehicle) UNSIGNALIZED/ROUNDABOUT A Less than or equal to 10 B Between 10.1 and 15 C Between 15.1 and 25 D Between 25.1 and 35 E Between 35.1 and 50 F greater than 50 CAPACITY ANALYSIS SCENARIOS To evaluate the proposed development's effect on the public street system, an analysis has been made for the peak hours at each of the study intersections based on the sum of existing traffic volumes and generated traffic volumes from the proposed development. The following tables summarize the level of service results at each study intersection. The Synchro (HCM 7th Edition) intersection reports illustrating the capacity analysis results are included in the Appendix. TABLE 5 – LOS SUMMARY: 116TH ST & SPRING MILL ROAD Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Northbound Approach A A A B Southbound Approach A A A B Eastbound Approach B B A A Westbound Approach A A B B Intersection A A A B 4 Synchro/SimTraffic 12, Cubic Transportation Systems, 2023. 5 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 7th Edition Transportation Research Board, The National Academies of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2022. JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 11 TABLE 6 – LOS SUMMARY: SPRING MILL ROAD & HAMLET ROAD Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Northbound Left-Turn A A A A Eastbound Approach B B B B TABLE 7 – LOS SUMMARY: 116TH STREET & TEMPLE DRIVE/PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Northbound Approach D E Southbound Approach E F Eastbound Lef-Turn A B Westbound Left-Turn A A Analysis considers construction of the southbound access drive with one inbound and two outbound lanes that will stop for 116th Street and construction of an exclusive eastbound left-turn lane along 116th Street. TABLE 8 – LOS SUMMARY: SPRING MILL ROAD & PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE Approach AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Scenario 2 Scenario 2 Northbound Left-Turn A A Eastbound Approach B A Analysis considers construction of the eastbound left-in/right-in/right-out access drive with one inbound and one outbound lane that will stop for Spring Mill Road. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS The conclusions that follow are based on existing traffic volume data, trip generation, assignment and distribution of generated traffic, turn lane analysis, capacity analyses/level of service results, and a field review conducted at the site. Based on the analysis and the resulting conclusions of this study, the following recommendations are formulated to ensure that the roadway system will accommodate the increased traffic volumes from the site. 116TH STREET & SPRING MILL ROAD Capacity analyses have shown that the intersection currently operated and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, no improvements are recommended at this location. SPRING MILL ROAD & HAMLET DRIVE Capacity analyses have shown that all approaches to this intersection currently operate and will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours. Therefore, no improvements are recommended at this location. JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 12 116TH STREET & TEMPLE DRIVE/PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE Capacity analyses have shown that the southbound approach will operate below acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the following intersection conditions. However, it should be noted that it is not uncommon for the minor street to experience increased delays when the major street has high traffic volumes. • The existing driveway has been constructed and will adequately serve traffic exiting and entering the site in a safe manner. SPRING MILL ROAD & PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE Capacity analyses have shown that all approaches to this intersection will operate at acceptable levels of service during the AM and PM peak hours with the following intersection conditions: • The existing driveway has been constructed and will adequately serve traffic exiting and entering the site in a safe manner. TRAFFIC OPERATIONS ANALYSIS APPENDIX 8365 Keystone Crossing Boulevard, Suite 201 Indianapolis, IN 46240 Phone: (317) 202-0864 Fax: (317) 202-0908 JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 116TH STREET & SPRING MILL ROAD TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Full Length (6:30 AM-8:30 AM, 11 AM-1 PM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West East Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Time L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 6:30AM 6 5 10 0 2121 22 4 1 0 2727 2 47 8 0 5757 7 29 5 0 4141 146146 6:45AM 6 9 5 0 2020 23 38 2 0 6363 1 70 16 0 8787 10 44 3 0 5757 227227 Hourly Total 12 14 15 0 4141 45 42 3 0 9090 3 117 24 0 144144 17 73 8 0 9898 373373 7:00AM 14 15 3 0 3232 24 27 4 0 5555 0 79 16 0 9595 11 40 5 0 5656 238238 7:15AM 15 11 2 0 2828 38 52 5 0 9595 6 94 20 0 120120 14 79 8 1 102102 345345 7:30AM 11 20 1 0 3232 38 65 11 0 114114 6 139 30 0 175175 21 111 9 0 141141 462462 7:45AM 24 16 13 0 5353 36 59 8 0 103103 13 168 43 0 224224 18 110 7 0 135135 515515 Hourly Total 64 62 19 0 145145 136 203 28 0 367367 25 480 109 0 614614 64 340 29 1 434434 15601560 8:00AM 32 29 12 0 7373 44 50 13 0 107107 14 149 36 0 199199 18 95 8 0 121121 500500 8:15AM 23 14 15 0 5252 35 70 8 0 113113 25 182 45 0 252252 20 95 22 0 137137 554554 Hourly Total 55 43 27 0 125125 79 120 21 0 220220 39 331 81 0 451451 38 190 30 0 258258 10541054 11:00AM 17 25 9 0 5151 29 8 1 0 3838 4 78 13 0 9595 21 98 16 0 135135 319319 11:15AM 22 22 20 0 6464 25 14 7 0 4646 5 83 18 0 106106 30 99 17 0 146146 362362 11:30AM 24 38 10 0 7272 38 15 5 0 5858 4 98 12 0 114114 25 95 23 0 143143 387387 11:45AM 31 27 13 0 7171 34 20 3 0 5757 3 108 21 0 132132 18 77 28 0 123123 383383 Hourly Total 94 112 52 0 258258 126 57 16 0 199199 16 367 64 0 447447 94 369 84 0 547547 14511451 12:00PM 22 25 14 0 6161 17 16 2 0 3535 7 93 20 0 120120 20 93 15 0 128128 344344 12:15PM 34 23 15 0 7272 26 17 0 0 4343 4 114 13 0 131131 18 89 14 0 121121 367367 12:30PM 23 19 12 0 5454 32 18 3 0 5353 8 103 18 0 129129 27 87 15 0 129129 365365 12:45PM 30 26 15 0 7171 39 29 7 0 7575 7 114 13 0 134134 11 90 9 0 110110 390390 Hourly Total 109 93 56 0 258258 114 80 12 0 206206 26 424 64 0 514514 76 359 53 0 488488 14661466 4:00PM 35 47 14 0 9696 38 19 6 0 6363 4 118 16 0 138138 30 146 31 0 207207 504504 4:15PM 40 44 11 0 9595 33 28 9 0 7070 6 130 17 0 153153 20 175 32 0 227227 545545 4:30PM 45 75 12 0 132132 24 17 9 0 5050 7 145 20 0 172172 27 186 28 0 241241 595595 4:45PM 46 71 9 0 126126 18 28 5 0 5151 6 141 14 0 161161 19 150 37 0 206206 544544 Hourly Total 166 237 46 0 449449 113 92 29 0 234234 23 534 67 0 624624 96 657 128 0 881881 21882188 5:00PM 52 69 11 0 132132 18 25 9 0 5252 4 145 24 0 173173 24 197 35 0 256256 613613 5:15PM 56 65 10 0 131131 16 25 7 0 4848 6 162 27 0 195195 23 180 30 0 233233 607607 5:30PM 36 58 12 0 106106 23 19 4 0 4646 8 164 16 0 188188 21 147 39 0 207207 547547 5:45PM 30 42 8 0 8080 18 21 7 0 4646 8 153 15 0 176176 11 116 18 0 145145 447447 Hourly Total 174 234 41 0 449449 75 90 27 0 192192 26 624 82 0 732732 79 640 122 0 841841 22142214 TotalTotal 674 795 256 0 17251725 688 684 136 0 15081508 158 2877 491 0 35263526 464 2628 454 1 35473547 1030610306 % Approach% Approach 39.1%46.1%14.8%0%--45.6%45.4%9.0%0%--4.5%81.6%13.9%0%--13.1%74.1%12.8%0%--- % Total% Total 6.5%7.7%2.5%0%16.7%16.7%6.7%6.6%1.3%0%14.6%14.6%1.5%27.9%4.8%0%34.2%34.2%4.5%25.5%4.4%0%34.4%34.4%- Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 667 790 253 0 17101710 683 678 132 0 14931493 152 2844 485 0 34813481 455 2584 451 0 34903490 10174 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 99.0%99.4%98.8%0%99.1%99.1%99.3%99.1%97.1%0%99.0%99.0%96.2%98.9%98.8%0%98.7%98.7%98.1%98.3%99.3%0%98.4%98.4%98.7% HeavyHeavy 7 5 3 0 1515 5 6 4 0 1515 6 33 6 0 4545 9 44 3 1 5757 132 % Heavy% Heavy 1.0%0.6%1.2%0%0.9%0.9%0.7%0.9%2.9%0%1.0%1.0%3.8%1.1%1.2%0%1.3%1.3%1.9%1.7%0.7%100%1.6%1.6%1.3% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Full Length (6:30 AM-8:30 AM, 11 AM-1 PM, 4 PM-6 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [E] East [S] South [W] West Total: 2915 Total: 3364 Total: 7369 Total: 6964 Out: 1407 Out: 1639 Out: 3822 Out: 3438 In: 1508 In: 1725 In: 3547 In: 3526 684 2628 795 2877 688 136 454 1 464 256 674 158 491 2 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West East Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Time L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 7:30AM 11 20 1 0 3232 38 65 11 0 114114 6 139 30 0 175175 21 111 9 0 141141 462462 7:45AM 24 16 13 0 5353 36 59 8 0 103103 13 168 43 0 224224 18 110 7 0 135135 515515 8:00AM 32 29 12 0 7373 44 50 13 0 107107 14 149 36 0 199199 18 95 8 0 121121 500500 8:15AM 23 14 15 0 5252 35 70 8 0 113113 25 182 45 0 252252 20 95 22 0 137137 554554 TotalTotal 90 79 41 0 210210 153 244 40 0 437437 58 638 154 0 850850 77 411 46 0 534534 20312031 % Approach% Approach 42.9%37.6%19.5%0%--35.0%55.8%9.2%0%--6.8%75.1%18.1%0%--14.4%77.0%8.6%0%--- % Total% Total 4.4%3.9%2.0%0%10.3%10.3%7.5%12.0%2.0%0%21.5%21.5%2.9%31.4%7.6%0%41.9%41.9%3.8%20.2%2.3%0%26.3%26.3%- PHFPHF 0.703 0.681 0.683 -0.7190.719 0.869 0.871 0.769 -0.9580.958 0.580 0.876 0.856 -0.8430.843 0.917 0.926 0.523 -0.9470.947 0.917 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 86 78 40 0 204204 153 243 38 0 434434 56 633 148 0 837837 75 403 46 0 524524 1999 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 95.6%98.7%97.6%0%97.1%97.1%100%99.6%95.0%0%99.3%99.3%96.6%99.2%96.1%0%98.5%98.5%97.4%98.1%100%0%98.1%98.1%98.4% HeavyHeavy 4 1 1 0 66 0 1 2 0 33 2 5 6 0 1313 2 8 0 0 1010 32 % Heavy% Heavy 4.4%1.3%2.4%0%2.9%2.9%0%0.4%5.0%0%0.7%0.7%3.4%0.8%3.9%0%1.5%1.5%2.6%1.9%0%0%1.9%1.9%1.6% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 AM Peak (7:30 AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [E] East [S] South [W] West Total: 620 Total: 685 Total: 1366 Total: 1391 Out: 183 Out: 475 Out: 832 Out: 541 In: 437 In: 210 In: 534 In: 850 244 411 79 638 153 40 46 77 41 90 58 154 4 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Midday Peak (11:30 AM - 12:30 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West East Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Time L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 11:30AM 24 38 10 0 7272 38 15 5 0 5858 4 98 12 0 114114 25 95 23 0 143143 387387 11:45AM 31 27 13 0 7171 34 20 3 0 5757 3 108 21 0 132132 18 77 28 0 123123 383383 12:00PM 22 25 14 0 6161 17 16 2 0 3535 7 93 20 0 120120 20 93 15 0 128128 344344 12:15PM 34 23 15 0 7272 26 17 0 0 4343 4 114 13 0 131131 18 89 14 0 121121 367367 TotalTotal 111 113 52 0 276276 115 68 10 0 193193 18 413 66 0 497497 81 354 80 0 515515 14811481 % Approach% Approach 40.2%40.9%18.8%0%--59.6%35.2%5.2%0%--3.6%83.1%13.3%0%--15.7%68.7%15.5%0%--- % Total% Total 7.5%7.6%3.5%0%18.6%18.6%7.8%4.6%0.7%0%13.0%13.0%1.2%27.9%4.5%0%33.6%33.6%5.5%23.9%5.4%0%34.8%34.8%- PHFPHF 0.816 0.743 0.867 -0.9580.958 0.757 0.850 0.500 -0.8320.832 0.643 0.906 0.786 -0.9410.941 0.810 0.932 0.714 -0.9000.900 0.957 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 109 112 50 0 271271 113 67 9 0 189189 18 404 66 0 488488 80 340 78 0 498498 1446 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 98.2%99.1%96.2%0%98.2%98.2%98.3%98.5%90.0%0%97.9%97.9%100%97.8%100%0%98.2%98.2%98.8%96.0%97.5%0%96.7%96.7%97.6% HeavyHeavy 2 1 2 0 55 2 1 1 0 44 0 9 0 0 99 1 14 2 0 1717 35 % Heavy% Heavy 1.8%0.9%3.8%0%1.8%1.8%1.7%1.5%10.0%0%2.1%2.1%0%2.2%0%0%1.8%1.8%1.2%4.0%2.5%0%3.3%3.3%2.4% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Midday Peak (11:30 AM - 12:30 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [E] East [S] South [W] West Total: 404 Total: 491 Total: 1095 Total: 972 Out: 211 Out: 215 Out: 580 Out: 475 In: 193 In: 276 In: 515 In: 497 68 354 113 413 115 10 80 81 52 111 18 66 6 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 PM Peak (4:30 PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West East Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Time L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp L T R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 4:30PM 45 75 12 0 132132 24 17 9 0 5050 7 145 20 0 172172 27 186 28 0 241241 595595 4:45PM 46 71 9 0 126126 18 28 5 0 5151 6 141 14 0 161161 19 150 37 0 206206 544544 5:00PM 52 69 11 0 132132 18 25 9 0 5252 4 145 24 0 173173 24 197 35 0 256256 613613 5:15PM 56 65 10 0 131131 16 25 7 0 4848 6 162 27 0 195195 23 180 30 0 233233 607607 TotalTotal 199 280 42 0 521521 76 95 30 0 201201 23 593 85 0 701701 93 713 130 0 936936 23592359 % Approach% Approach 38.2%53.7%8.1%0%--37.8%47.3%14.9%0%--3.3%84.6%12.1%0%--9.9%76.2%13.9%0%--- % Total% Total 8.4%11.9%1.8%0%22.1%22.1%3.2%4.0%1.3%0%8.5%8.5%1.0%25.1%3.6%0%29.7%29.7%3.9%30.2%5.5%0%39.7%39.7%- PHFPHF 0.888 0.933 0.875 -0.9870.987 0.792 0.848 0.833 -0.9660.966 0.821 0.915 0.787 -0.8990.899 0.861 0.905 0.878 -0.9140.914 0.962 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 199 280 42 0 521521 75 94 30 0 199199 23 586 85 0 694694 93 696 130 0 919919 2333 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 100%100%100%0%100%100%98.7%98.9%100%0%99.0%99.0%100%98.8%100%0%99.0%99.0%100%97.6%100%0%98.2%98.2%98.9% HeavyHeavy 0 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 0 22 0 7 0 0 77 0 17 0 0 1717 26 % Heavy% Heavy 0%0%0%0%0%0%1.3%1.1%0%0%1.0%1.0%0%1.2%0%0%1.0%1.0%0%2.4%0%0%1.8%1.8%1.1% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 7 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & 116TH ST - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 PM Peak (4:30 PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159155, Location: 39.956148, -86.164732 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [E] East [S] South [W] West Total: 634 Total: 794 Total: 1647 Total: 1643 Out: 433 Out: 273 Out: 711 Out: 942 In: 201 In: 521 In: 936 In: 701 95 713 280 593 76 30 130 93 42 199 23 85 8 of 8 HCM 7th Roundabout Existing AM Peak 1: Spring Mill Rd & 116th St Scenario 1 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineering Co., LLC Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.1 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2 2 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 923 581 229 474 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 941 593 234 483 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 525 252 940 642 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 600 922 526 203 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 11.7 5.9 8.5 8.3 Approach LOS BAAA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT TR LT TR LT TR LT TR Assumed Moves LTTR LTTR LTTR LTTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 A (Intercept) 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 B (Slope) 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 Entry Flow, veh/h 442 499 279 314 110 124 227 256 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 833 909 1071 1146 569 639 748 823 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.980 0.979 0.981 0.980 0.980 0.981 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 434 489 273 308 108 122 223 251 Cap Entry, veh/h 818 891 1048 1124 557 626 733 807 V/C Ratio 0.531 0.549 0.261 0.274 0.193 0.194 0.304 0.311 Control Delay, s/veh 11.9 11.6 5.9 5.8 9.0 8.1 8.6 8.0 LOS BBAAAAAA 95th %tile Queue, veh 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 HCM 7th Roundabout Existing PM Peak 1: Spring Mill Rd & 116th St Scenario 1 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineering Co., LLC Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.9 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2 2 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 731 975 543 209 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 738 984 548 211 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 278 528 728 1057 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 990 748 288 455 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 6.8 12.3 9.8 9.2 Approach LOS ABAA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT TR LT TR LT TR LT TR Assumed Moves LTTR LTTR LTTR LTTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.471 0.529 0.469 0.531 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 A (Intercept) 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 B (Slope) 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 Entry Flow, veh/h 347 391 462 522 258 290 99 112 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1045 1121 831 907 691 765 511 578 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.990 0.991 0.991 0.990 0.989 0.993 0.992 0.989 Flow Entry, veh/h 343 387 458 517 255 288 98 111 Cap Entry, veh/h 1035 1111 823 897 684 759 507 572 V/C Ratio 0.332 0.349 0.556 0.576 0.373 0.379 0.194 0.194 Control Delay, s/veh 6.9 6.7 12.5 12.2 10.2 9.5 9.8 8.8 LOS AABBBAAA 95th %tile Queue, veh 1 2 3 4 2 2 1 1 HCM 7th Roundabout Existing + Proposed AM Peak 1: Spring Mill Rd & 116th St Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.4 Intersection LOS A Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2 2 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 941 225 235 515 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 959 230 240 525 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 567 259 991 245 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 203 972 535 244 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 12.9 4.3 9.1 5.5 Approach LOS BAAA Lane Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT TR LT TR LT TR LT TR Assumed Moves LTTR LTTR LTTR LTTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.471 0.529 0.470 0.530 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 A (Intercept) 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 B (Slope) 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 Entry Flow, veh/h 451 508 108 122 113 127 247 278 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 801 877 1064 1139 542 612 1077 1153 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.982 0.979 0.977 0.978 0.981 0.979 0.981 Flow Entry, veh/h 442 499 106 119 111 125 242 273 Cap Entry, veh/h 786 861 1041 1113 531 600 1055 1131 V/C Ratio 0.563 0.579 0.102 0.107 0.208 0.208 0.229 0.241 Control Delay, s/veh 13.1 12.7 4.4 4.2 9.6 8.6 5.6 5.4 LOS BBAAAAAA 95th %tile Queue, veh 4 4 0 0 1 1 1 1 HCM 7th Roundabout Existing + Proposed PM Peak 1: Spring Mill Rd & 116th St Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 1 Intersection Intersection Delay, s/veh 10.7 Intersection LOS B Approach EB WB NB SB Entry Lanes 2 2 2 2 Conflicting Circle Lanes 2 2 2 2 Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 745 1025 552 252 Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 752 1036 557 254 Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 321 537 776 1072 Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 1005 796 297 501 Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0 Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Approach Delay, s/veh 7.2 13.4 10.6 10.0 Approach LOS ABBB Lane Left Right Left Right Left Right Left Right Designated Moves LT TR LT TR LT TR LT TR Assumed Moves LTTR LTTR LTTR LTTR RT Channelized Lane Util 0.469 0.531 0.470 0.530 0.470 0.530 0.469 0.531 Follow-Up Headway, s 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 2.667 2.535 Critical Headway, s 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 4.645 4.328 A (Intercept) 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 1350 1420 B (Slope) 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 9.199e-48.501e-4 Entry Flow, veh/h 353 399 487 549 262 295 119 135 Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 1005 1081 824 900 661 734 504 571 Entry HV Adj Factor 0.992 0.989 0.990 0.990 0.990 0.992 0.995 0.989 Flow Entry, veh/h 350 395 482 543 259 293 118 134 Cap Entry, veh/h 996 1069 815 891 655 728 501 565 V/C Ratio 0.351 0.369 0.591 0.610 0.396 0.402 0.236 0.236 Control Delay, s/veh 7.3 7.2 13.6 13.2 11.0 10.2 10.6 9.5 LOS AABBBBBA 95th %tile Queue, veh 2 2 4 4 2 2 1 1 JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA SPRING MILL ROAD & HAMLET DRIVE TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS CAPACITY ANALYSIS SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Tue Feb 20, 2024 Full Length (4 PM-6 PM, 6:30 AM-8:30 AM, 11 AM-1 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Time L T U AppApp T R U AppApp L R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-20 4:00PM 4 89 0 9393 42 2 0 4444 0 5 0 55 142142 4:15PM 7 89 0 9696 45 0 0 4545 0 8 0 88 149149 4:30PM 4 110 0 114114 59 0 0 5959 2 5 0 77 180180 4:45PM 7 92 0 9999 60 1 0 6161 1 4 0 55 165165 Hourly Total 22 380 0 402402 206 3 0 209209 3 22 0 2525 636636 5:00PM 6 120 0 126126 44 0 0 4444 1 2 0 33 173173 5:15PM 4 108 0 112112 37 0 0 3737 0 4 0 44 153153 5:30PM 7 101 0 108108 49 0 0 4949 1 5 0 66 163163 5:45PM 1 84 0 8585 24 1 0 2525 0 5 0 55 115115 Hourly Total 18 413 0 431431 154 1 0 155155 2 16 0 1818 604604 6:00PM 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 Hourly Total 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 2024-02-21 6:30AM 1 11 0 1212 27 0 0 2727 0 2 0 22 4141 6:45AM 1 11 0 1212 57 1 0 5858 0 3 0 33 7373 Hourly Total 2 22 0 2424 84 1 0 8585 0 5 0 55 114114 7:00AM 0 21 0 2121 62 0 0 6262 0 2 0 22 8585 7:15AM 0 24 0 2424 85 0 0 8585 0 7 0 77 116116 7:30AM 4 26 0 3030 111 0 0 111111 0 6 0 66 147147 7:45AM 3 32 0 3535 102 0 0 102102 0 2 0 22 139139 Hourly Total 7 103 0 110110 360 0 0 360360 0 17 0 1717 487487 8:00AM 4 42 0 4646 110 0 0 110110 0 5 0 55 161161 8:15AM 5 51 0 5656 106 0 0 106106 0 6 0 66 168168 8:30AM 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 00 00 Hourly Total 9 93 0 102102 216 0 0 216216 0 11 0 1111 329329 11:00AM 2 41 0 4343 36 0 0 3636 0 5 0 55 8484 11:15AM 2 39 0 4141 43 0 0 4343 2 4 0 66 9090 11:30AM 5 58 0 6363 53 1 0 5454 1 6 0 77 124124 11:45AM 2 53 0 5555 47 0 0 4747 0 5 0 55 107107 Hourly Total 11 191 0 202202 179 1 0 180180 3 20 0 2323 405405 12:00PM 2 38 0 4040 42 1 0 4343 0 0 0 00 8383 12:15PM 2 44 0 4646 38 1 0 3939 0 3 0 33 8888 12:30PM 1 39 0 4040 54 0 0 5454 0 4 0 44 9898 12:45PM 3 41 0 4444 66 1 0 6767 0 4 0 44 115115 Hourly Total 8 162 0 170170 200 3 0 203203 0 11 0 1111 384384 1:00PM 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 22 0 0 0 00 22 Hourly Total 0 0 0 00 1 1 0 22 0 0 0 00 22 TotalTotal 77 1364 0 14411441 1400 10 0 14101410 8 102 0 110110 29612961 % Approach% Approach 5.3%94.7%0%--99.3%0.7%0%--7.3%92.7%0%--- % Total% Total 2.6%46.1%0%48.7%48.7%47.3%0.3%0%47.6%47.6%0.3%3.4%0%3.7%3.7%- Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 75 1351 0 14261426 1380 9 0 13891389 8 96 0 104104 2919 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 97.4%99.0%0%99.0%99.0%98.6%90.0%0%98.5%98.5%100%94.1%0%94.5%94.5%98.6% HeavyHeavy 2 13 0 1515 20 1 0 2121 0 6 0 66 42 % Heavy% Heavy 2.6%1.0%0%1.0%1.0%1.4%10.0%0%1.5%1.5%0%5.9%0%5.5%5.5%1.4% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 1 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Tue Feb 20, 2024 Full Length (4 PM-6 PM, 6:30 AM-8:30 AM, 11 AM-1 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [S] South [W] West Total: 2782 Total: 2943 Total: 197 Out: 1372 Out: 1502 Out: 87 In: 1410 In: 1441 In: 110 1400 1364 10 77 8 102 2 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Tue Feb 20, 2024 PM Peak (Feb 20 2024 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Time L T U AppApp T R U AppApp L R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-20 4:30PM 4 110 0 114114 59 0 0 5959 2 5 0 77 180180 4:45PM 7 92 0 9999 60 1 0 6161 1 4 0 55 165165 5:00PM 6 120 0 126126 44 0 0 4444 1 2 0 33 173173 5:15PM 4 108 0 112112 37 0 0 3737 0 4 0 44 153153 TotalTotal 21 430 0 451451 200 1 0 201201 4 15 0 1919 671671 % Approach% Approach 4.7%95.3%0%--99.5%0.5%0%--21.1%78.9%0%--- % Total% Total 3.1%64.1%0%67.2%67.2%29.8%0.1%0%30.0%30.0%0.6%2.2%0%2.8%2.8%- PHFPHF 0.750 0.896 -0.8950.895 0.833 0.250 -0.8240.824 0.500 0.750 -0.6790.679 0.932 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 20 430 0 450450 194 1 0 195195 4 12 0 1616 661 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 95.2%100%0%99.8%99.8%97.0%100%0%97.0%97.0%100%80.0%0%84.2%84.2%98.5% HeavyHeavy 1 0 0 11 6 0 0 66 0 3 0 33 10 % Heavy% Heavy 4.8%0%0%0.2%0.2%3.0%0%0%3.0%3.0%0%20.0%0%15.8%15.8%1.5% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 3 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Tue Feb 20, 2024 PM Peak (Feb 20 2024 4:30PM - 5:30 PM) - Overall Peak Hour All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [S] South [W] West Total: 635 Total: 666 Total: 41 Out: 434 Out: 215 Out: 22 In: 201 In: 451 In: 19 200 430 1 21 4 15 4 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 AM Peak (Feb 21 2024 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Time L T U AppApp T R U AppApp L R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 7:30AM 4 26 0 3030 111 0 0 111111 0 6 0 66 147147 7:45AM 3 32 0 3535 102 0 0 102102 0 2 0 22 139139 8:00AM 4 42 0 4646 110 0 0 110110 0 5 0 55 161161 8:15AM 5 51 0 5656 106 0 0 106106 0 6 0 66 168168 TotalTotal 16 151 0 167167 429 0 0 429429 0 19 0 1919 615615 % Approach% Approach 9.6%90.4%0%--100%0%0%--0%100%0%--- % Total% Total 2.6%24.6%0%27.2%27.2%69.8%0%0%69.8%69.8%0%3.1%0%3.1%3.1%- PHFPHF 0.800 0.740 -0.7460.746 0.966 --0.9660.966 -0.792 -0.7920.792 0.915 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 16 148 0 164164 426 0 0 426426 0 19 0 1919 609 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 100%98.0%0%98.2%98.2%99.3%0%0%99.3%99.3%0%100%0%100%100%99.0% HeavyHeavy 0 3 0 33 3 0 0 33 0 0 0 00 6 % Heavy% Heavy 0%2.0%0%1.8%1.8%0.7%0%0%0.7%0.7%0%0%0%0%0%1.0% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 5 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 AM Peak (Feb 21 2024 7:30AM - 8:30 AM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [S] South [W] West Total: 580 Total: 615 Total: 35 Out: 151 Out: 448 Out: 16 In: 429 In: 167 In: 19 429 151 16 19 6 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Midday Peak (Feb 21 2024 11AM - 12 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US Leg South North West Direction Northbound Southbound Eastbound Time L T U AppApp T R U AppApp L R U AppApp IntInt 2024-02-21 11:00AM 2 41 0 4343 36 0 0 3636 0 5 0 55 8484 11:15AM 2 39 0 4141 43 0 0 4343 2 4 0 66 9090 11:30AM 5 58 0 6363 53 1 0 5454 1 6 0 77 124124 11:45AM 2 53 0 5555 47 0 0 4747 0 5 0 55 107107 TotalTotal 11 191 0 202202 179 1 0 180180 3 20 0 2323 405405 % Approach% Approach 5.4%94.6%0%--99.4%0.6%0%--13.0%87.0%0%--- % Total% Total 2.7%47.2%0%49.9%49.9%44.2%0.2%0%44.4%44.4%0.7%4.9%0%5.7%5.7%- PHFPHF 0.550 0.823 -0.8020.802 0.844 0.250 -0.8330.833 0.375 0.833 -0.8210.821 0.817 Lights and MotorcyclesLights and Motorcycles 10 188 0 198198 175 1 0 176176 3 19 0 2222 396 % Lights and Motorcycles% Lights and Motorcycles 90.9%98.4%0%98.0%98.0%97.8%100%0%97.8%97.8%100%95.0%0%95.7%95.7%97.8% HeavyHeavy 1 3 0 44 4 0 0 44 0 1 0 11 9 % Heavy% Heavy 9.1%1.6%0%2.0%2.0%2.2%0%0%2.2%2.2%0%5.0%0%4.3%4.3%2.2% *L: Left, R: Right, T: Thru, U: U-Turn 7 of 8 SPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMCSPRINGMILL RD & HAMLET DR - TMC Wed Feb 21, 2024 Midday Peak (Feb 21 2024 11AM - 12 PM) All Classes (Lights and Motorcycles, Heavy) All Movements ID: 1159154, Location: 39.958952, -86.164702 Provided by: A&F Engineering 8365 Keystone Crossing, Suite 201, Indianapolis, IN, 46240, US [N] North [S] South [W] West Total: 374 Total: 401 Total: 35 Out: 194 Out: 199 Out: 12 In: 180 In: 202 In: 23 179 191 1 11 3 20 8 of 8 HCM 7th TWSC Existing AM Peak 2: Spring Mill Rd & Hamlet Dr Scenario 1 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineering Co., LLC Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.6 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 19 16 151 429 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 19 16 151 429 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 130 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 0 21 17 164 466 0 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 665 466 466 0 - 0 Stage 1 466 ----- Stage 2 199 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.41 6.21 4.11 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.41----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.41----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 3.309 2.209 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 427 598 1100 - - - Stage 1 634 ----- Stage 2 837 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 420 598 1100 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 420 ----- Stage 1 623 ----- Stage 2 837 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v11.23 0.8 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1100 - 598 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - 0.035 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.3 - 11.2 - - HCM Lane LOS A - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.1 - - HCM 7th TWSC Existing PM Peak 2: Spring Mill Rd & Hamlet Dr Scenario 1 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineering Co., LLC Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.5 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 15 21 430 200 1 Future Vol, veh/h 4 15 21 430 200 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 130 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 4 16 23 462 215 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 723 215 216 0 - 0 Stage 1 215 ----- Stage 2 508 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.42----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.42----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 393 825 1354 - - - Stage 1 821 ----- Stage 2 605 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 387 825 1354 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 387 ----- Stage 1 807 ----- Stage 2 605 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v10.58 0.36 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1354 - 666 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.031 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - 10.6 - - HCM Lane LOS A - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.1 - - HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed AM Peak 2: Spring Mill Rd & Hamlet Dr Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 13 20 16 150 439 1 Future Vol, veh/h 13 20 16 150 439 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 130 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 1 1 1 1 1 1 Mvmt Flow 14 22 17 163 477 1 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 675 477 478 0 - 0 Stage 1 477 ----- Stage 2 198 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.41 6.21 4.11 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.41----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.41----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.509 3.309 2.209 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 421 590 1089 - - - Stage 1 626 ----- Stage 2 838 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 414 590 1089 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 414 ----- Stage 1 616 ----- Stage 2 838 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v12.66 0.81 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1089 - 506 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.016 - 0.071 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - 12.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - 0.2 - - HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed PM Peak 2: Spring Mill Rd & Hamlet Dr Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 2 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 25 15 21 422 213 2 Future Vol, veh/h 25 15 21 422 213 2 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length 0 - 100 - - 130 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 93 93 93 93 93 93 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 27 16 23 454 229 2 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All 728 229 231 0 - 0 Stage 1 229 ----- Stage 2 499 ----- Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 15.42----- Critical Hdwy Stg 25.42----- Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 390 810 1337 - - - Stage 1 809 ----- Stage 2 610 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 384 810 1337 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 384 ----- Stage 1 795 ----- Stage 2 610 ----- Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v13.27 0.37 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1337 - 478 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.017 - 0.09 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.7 - 13.3 - - HCM Lane LOS A - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - - JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA 116TH STREET & TEMPLE DRIVE/PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE TURN LANE WARRANT CAPACITY ANALYSIS 5% Left Turns 10% Left Turns 15% Left Turns 20% Left Turns 25% Left Turns 30% Left Turns 35% Left Turns 40% Left Turns 800 330 240 207 180 168 160 146 139 Advancing Volume (Va)855 Advancing Volume (Va)708 600 410 305 260 225 211 200 184 174 Opposing Volume (Vo)553 Opposing Volume (Vo)956 400 510 380 320 275 258 245 224 212 Left-Turn Volume 17 Left-Turn Volume 19 200 640 470 401 350 324 305 282 266 % Left-Turn 2%% Left-Turn 3% 100 720 515 446 390 360 340 313 296 WARRANTED?YES WARRANTED?YES Operating Speed (mph) Opposing Volume (veh/h) Advancing Volume (veh/h) AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume Input PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume Input 40 5% LT 10% LT 20% LT 30% LT 40% LT 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Vo - Vo l u m e O p p o s i n g Va -Volume Advancing Left-Turn Lane Warrant on Two -Lane Roadway (40 MPH ) 5% Left-Turns 10% Left-Turns 20% Left-Turn 30% Left-Turns 40% Left-Turn AM Peak PM PeakLeft-Turn Lane May Not Be Necessary 116th St & Temple Dr/Prpoosed Access Drive -Existing + Proposed Traffic Volumes Total Approach Volume Right-Turn Volume 0 120 Total Approach Volume 553 Total Approach Volume 956 600 40 Right-Turn Volume 20 Right-Turn Volume 30 1000 40 WARRANTED?NO WARRANTED?NO AM Peak Hour Traffic Volume Input PM Peak Hour Traffic Volume Input 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 Ri g h t -Tu r n V o l u m e D u r i n g D H V Total DHV, Vehicles Per Hour, In One Direction Roadway & Proposed Access Drive -Existing + Proposed Traffic Volumes Traffic Volume Threshold AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Right-Turn Lane Should Be Considered Right-Turn Lane May Not Be Necessary Right-Turn Lane Warrant on Two-Lane Roadway HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed AM Peak 3: Temple Dr/Proposed Access & 116th St Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.6 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 17833555282050527014 Future Vol, veh/h 17833555282050527014 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 85 220 -------- Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222 Mvmt Flow 18905555742250529015 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 596 0 0 911 0 0 1527 1549 905 1538 1543 585 Stage 1 ------942942-596596- Stage 2 ------585607-942948- Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.125.52-6.125.52- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.125.52-6.125.52- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 981 - - 748 - - 96 114 335 94 115 511 Stage 1 ------315341-490492- Stage 2 ------497487-315339- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 981 - - 748 - - 91 111 335 90 112 511 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------91111-90112- Stage 1 ------310335-487488- Stage 2 ------479483-305333- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.17 0.09 32.26 45.55 HCM LOS D E Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 143 981 - - 748 - - 90 511 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.076 0.019 - - 0.007 - - 0.324 0.03 HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 32.3 8.7 - - 9.8 - - 62.8 12.3 HCM Lane LOS D A - - A - - F B HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.2 0.1 - - 0 - - 1.2 0.1 HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed PM Peak 3: Temple Dr/Proposed Access & 116th St Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 3 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 2.4 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 19684559213050526022 Future Vol, veh/h 19684559213050526022 Conflicting Peds, #/hr000000000000 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None Storage Length 100 - 85 220 -------- Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 222222222222 Mvmt Flow 21 743 5 5 1001 3350528024 Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1 Minor2 Conflicting Flow All 1034 0 0 749 0 0 1797 1829 743 1813 1818 1017 Stage 1 ------785785-1028 1028 - Stage 2 ------1012 1045 - 785 790 - Critical Hdwy 4.12 - - 4.12 - - 7.12 6.52 6.22 7.12 6.52 6.22 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------6.125.52-6.125.52- Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------6.125.52-6.125.52- Follow-up Hdwy 2.218 - - 2.218 - - 3.518 4.018 3.318 3.518 4.018 3.318 Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 672 - - 860 - - 62 77 415 61 78 288 Stage 1 ------386404-282311- Stage 2 ------288306-386401- Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 672 - - 860 - - 55 74 415 58 75 288 Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------5574-5875- Stage 1 ------374391-281309- Stage 2 ------263304-369389- Approach EB WB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 0.28 0.05 46.75 72 HCM LOS E F Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBRSBLn1SBLn2 Capacity (veh/h) 97 672 - - 860 - - 58 288 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 0.031 - - 0.006 - - 0.491 0.083 HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 46.8 10.5 - - 9.2 - - 117.2 18.6 HCM Lane LOS E B - - A - - F C HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 0.1 - - 0 - - 1.9 0.3 JACKSON GRANT VILLAGE CARMEL, INDIANA SPRING MILL ROAD & PROPOSED ACCESS DRIVE CAPACITY ANALYSIS HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed AM Peak 4: Spring Mill Rd & Proposed Access Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 44 38 166 411 18 Future Vol, veh/h 0 44 38 166 411 18 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 90 - - 150 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 48 41 180 447 20 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 447 466 0 - 0 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy - 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy - 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 612 1095 - - - Stage 1 0 ----- Stage 2 0 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 612 1095 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v11.38 1.57 0 HCM LOS B Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1095 - 612 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.038 - 0.078 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 8.4 - 11.4 - - HCM Lane LOS A - B - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.3 - - HCM 7th TWSC Existing + Proposed PM Peak 4: Spring Mill Rd & Proposed Access Scenario 2 03/02/2024 Synchro 12 Report A&F Engineerilng Co., LLC Page 4 Intersection Int Delay, s/veh 1.1 Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 44 51 443 212 16 Future Vol, veh/h 0 44 51 443 212 16 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None - None Storage Length - 0 90 - - 150 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 48 55 482 230 17 Major/Minor Minor2 Major1 Major2 Conflicting Flow All - 230 248 0 - 0 Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Critical Hdwy - 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 ------ Critical Hdwy Stg 2 ------ Follow-up Hdwy - 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 0 809 1318 - - - Stage 1 0 ----- Stage 2 0 ----- Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - 809 1318 - - - Mov Cap-2 Maneuver ------ Stage 1 ------ Stage 2 ------ Approach EB NB SB HCM Control Delay, s/v 9.73 0.81 0 HCM LOS A Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBTEBLn1 SBT SBR Capacity (veh/h) 1318 - 809 - - HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.042 - 0.059 - - HCM Control Delay (s/veh) 7.9 - 9.7 - - HCM Lane LOS A - A - - HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.1 - 0.2 - -