HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
ON-SIT
/ ,
ALUATION FOR EROSION AND SEDIll__...,In CONTROL
Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation'mStrict I)
1108 South 9th Street, NobJesville, IN 46060 1. 0 rf-
Ph: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101 \~'7/
)y
Date: $-/~ -0..3
Project Name: _~
Present at Site: John South, Hamilton Co. SWCD,
This Report Provided To: 77It;HPJMI ~ 4#L) . ~I<d,
C~ C #12/ S uhlZ..:r1l
d'fW LA~~/..>E [Jt...VD.
F/S#E~ 'TAl
"toMB
Ct/IHJ
~. .. SUIIX,/W
;:;~ I ~
TYPE OF EVALUATION:
o Initial
$f( Routine
o Follow-up
o Complaint
This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identify areas
where additional measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report
should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer.
All erosion and sediment control measures shall meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana
Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents.
Current Site Information: L AJlIJ DEUE.J../JPHEHr t'lnp~E..r~
~ /MH~S AhHl:. ~IIIS"'PtJ~1'En
P/~'S' t"61t"~1 Me. ,,6rJuf cI~4/H'J~ ,'S.JLJCj '1'1 41'rJlH'1/Q/ttd,
The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of:
S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable
Construction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Control
Sj gl U NA (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and
sediment control measures.
(2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented.
(3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures.
(4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly.
(5) Storm drain inlets have been adequately protected.
(6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized.
(7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained.
(8) Public & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soil.
(9) Erosion & sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites.
(i)M
~M
S M
S M
~M
S M @NA
,S ~
S M
U
U
$
NA
NA
NA
NA
U NA
U NA
U~
Status of Sediment Retention On-Site
o Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation.
o There is evidence of off-site sedimentation.
Describe:
Satisfactory:
Marginal:
Unsatisfactory:
Not Applicable:
Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report
Defmitions
The item is currently in compliance with the Rule
A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance
A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required
Does not apply at this stage of construction
Revised./ / 98
r--"""" .
ON-SIL. . EV ALVA nON FOR EROSION AND SEDH'OT CONTROL
-..
COMMENTS
PROJECT NAME:
S IIfL8!JtJlZlJL e!$ r;tI71$,S
Page 2
The items checked below must be corrected prior to 5"-.30 -03 , unless otherwise noted.
o Install an appropriate sediment control practice between construction areas and lower lying areas.
o
o
Replace/Repair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales.
Remove accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around stonn drain inlet
protection devices,)(streets and gutters (Do not flush with water)
Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch:
)(
o
o
Permanent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are at final
grade:
)(
Protect storm drain inlets:~ curb inlets, 0 drop inlets A4.L. ~ul!.8 IJIIJ.FTjiJI!Or&,.nAl WA..S J!EHbLf!il)
Reshape and stabilize sideslopes of: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 detention/retention basins
o
o
o
Install/Maintain construction entrance( s):
Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels:
o
Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall. be
removed (do not flush with water) at the end of each work day.
Other Requirements:
?I
It
;:4 ~r/(:_
to J~
p~~~pf
<:a.sth~~
~u~ _~ "'$~
. - or 't ~ - :." /", "Y
~n file ~"o/' ~'M lei-
fve,J:~ I..nl~r "'J~
H ~~cls-
,2,
-P!;t,,~~~~ ~:flt1
I
Th;s report subm;tted by: ~ #
Revised 4 / 98
u
u
CITY OF CARMEL
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 4&l32
(317) 571-2417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Fax
To: {lt0--I ~
Fax: cf' ~,,-- '73DO
From:
~
~
/ tJ-c902. -t?a
Pages:
Phone:
Date:
Re: ~ /Jp. /63-0..(.sy:J CCI
o Urgent
D Far Review D P.lease Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
u
u
City of Carmel
VIA FAX: 826-7200
Original by mail
October 22, 2002
J. Cort Crosby
The Schneider Corporation
8901 Otis Ave.
Indianapolis, IN 46216
Ll COpy
RE: Shelbourne Estates, Secondary Plat Application
Dear Mr. Crosby:
This letter is in response to your Secondary Plat application for Claybourne Estates. The
following issues must be resolved prior to signature of the plat by the director:
1. Add the secondary plat docket number (153-02 SP) to the plat.
Please submit a revised Secondary Plat with the above-mentioned changes. Once these changes
have been made and comments addressed, please produce a Mylar copy for signature by this
Department. Two paper copies of the plat must be filed with the Mylar prior to recording, and
three paper copies and a Mylar of the recorded plat must be submitted following recording. Our
approval of the secondary plat (signature) will be forthcoming upon revision of the plans
according to the items listed above.
Sincerely,
;; tbO&~~Z 7
Planning Administrator
Shelbourne Estates- SP 1
Page 1
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
317/571-2417
~, _.. - lel123/2BB2 B8: 24
317-776-11Bl
HAMILTON CO USDA
15
/53-pGil
4/t.OJ8
TYPE OF' EV ALUATION:
o Initial
tROD 'ne
o Follow-up
o Complaillt
This evallltUJon is intended to assess the levlli of compliance with 27l C 15.5 (Ru e 5). It is also intended 10 Identify areas
wh-ere addltlmlal fMtJ$l4res may be requIred to control eroslqn till :Jed entatwn. Ii prllaic~ recommended In thf3 report
.thould he evaluated as to t!telr feasIbility by a qualified Ind/vithla with tru.ctllral p pctlces designed by a qualifled engineer.
All ero.dol'l and sediment.control meuures .thall meet the de.YJp nert, standards and specijicatWlfs ou.tlined In tlte "Indiana
Hnhdhook p,r Erosiqn Cont,()Il1r Deve/Qping Areas" or similar ida" e documtm
Current Site l-hfonllatioI1:
,
(OM U NA
S M tJj) NA
S ~. U NA
S M qI)NA
(9M U NA
S M ~ NA
~ M U NA
5 M ~ NA
seeding or other lIppropriate erosion and
The Following Items Ha"e Been tval sted
S = Satisfactory 1\1 = Marginal U = V atis
Construction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Co rol
S M 4j)NA (1) Djsturbed areas have been adequatel prot cted throu
sediment control measures.
(Z) Appropriate perimeter sediment COil
(3) Conveyance channels have been sta
(4) Erosion & sediment control measur
(5) Stann drain inlets have been adequli
(6) Outlets have beel'llldequately stabili
(7) Existing erosion & sediment control
(8) Public & private roadways arc being
(9) Erosion & sediment control malSur
I m llSureS have een implemented.
lized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures.
are i stalled pro rly.
Iy p tected.
tas res are bein
apt lear of accu ulated sediment or tracked soil.
hav bCeTl install d and maintained on individual building sites.
StatU5 of Sediment RetentiGln On-Site
o Site conditions prescmt a high potential for off-site sediJ
o There is evidence of off-site sedimentation.
Describe;
en tat on.
Satisfactory:
Marginal;
Unsatis factory:
Not Applicable:
Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report
n
The item is currently in compliance with the
A concern has been Identjfied; corrective acti
A violation has been identified and the site is
Does not apply (l.t this stage of construction
mended to remain in compliance
orrect;ve action Is required
RfViyeJ 4/"
~.
. 18/23/2882 88:24
PAGE 16
317-776-1181 HAMILTON CO USDA
U ('\
ON-SIre BV ALUA TION FOR EROS()N AND SEDIM N~ONTR.Z:O?\ gIIw~
CoMME TS 1- ~~)
1ii,./6mb!. j)/lLK. '" RECEIVED ~ ,
\~ ~v I fl()~^ 2002 ;;
~~VJV/Z:)
A ^
The items checked below must be corrected prior to 16 "I/) ~L) z. ,unJe, otherwise noted. / <'". \~ '
o ll'stalf an appropriate sediment control practice between const!" ction areas and lo~ef lying areas. <c, I '<0
PROJECT'NAME:
Page 2
o
o
o
Replace/Repair silt fenee and/or straw bale barriers.
Entrench silt fence (6-8 In.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 ir ) and stake straw ales.
Remove accumulated sediment trom: 0 sediment tl'llpslbasins 0 be ind silt fene e;straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet
protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush/with w ter) ~
Temporary seed, fertili~, and/or mulch: 41/ t:. '/$ .,.
.~
,(
Permanent seed, fertiliu. and mulch areas that are at final
grade: Sw#/4S ~ 14111,.,M .,&t!L
1
Protect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets.tdrop inlet$ - l L io...--I-
Reshape and stabilize sldeslopes of: 0 sediment tr<,pslbasins, 0 de ntion/reten 'on basins
7,
-
",*,
~
o
o
Instal\lMllintaiJl construction entrance(s):
Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels;
7__
1<
f
~JA ._~f~_f
7
Place gr.eater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on b ildin sites; contr ctOTS, subcontractors, material vendors, and
others should be made aware of erosion and sediment contra requ rements. A propriate perimeter sediment controls
(e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be uti zed (~ al\ sites. ~ cdiment tracked Into the street shall be
removed (do not flush with water) at the end ofeach work d Iv.
Other Requirements:
o
. ~
~f~ .. ~/l J ..1 I. _I ..__ .I
. I
141,'"-""'-..11. .. , L-
A..- ~~ 'L 1- A 11 -
,
/ I
. .L. -J 4. '/ GM~T At#.
"
. _ . F ..~.) ..~
-
~ .1.1 Ju. ....,
~
,
-
Thi, report .ubmitlcd by: ~.
P._ if.
:....- ' ,
Revlsc(l4/98
o
~~
Schneider
o
October 16, 2002
w
f.
RECEIVED
OCT 18 2002
DOCS
Jon Dobosiewicz
Carmel DOCS
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 46032
RE: Claybourne, Section 1 and Shelbourne Estates
Secondary Plat and Construction Plans
Dear Jon,
The Secondary Plat and Construction plans have been revised according to your comment
latter dated October 3, 2002. Revisions requested by Carmel DOCS are as follows:
1. A secondary plat application for Shelbourne Estates is enclosed.
2. The monuments and markers have been updated by adding concrete monuments at
the perimeter of the subdivision section. The common areas for the islands were
removed in the last plan revisions.
3. The plat docket numbers have been added to the first page of the Shelboume Estates
plat.
4. The Albert Shaw Drain easement has been removed in favor of the regulated drain
easements on the storm sewers.
5. The landscaping plans have been revised including the mounding.
6. Copies of the letters to the agencies listed describing the changes are enclosed.
Approval letters will be forwarded when we receive them.
7. The path easement note has been added to each common area with paths.
8. The sidewalks have been revised to 5' in width.
9. The plat will be certified prior to routing once we have all approvals and are done
revising the plat.
10. The perimeter road improvements cost estimates and agreements are being handled
directly by the Developer.
Please approve these revised plans or call me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
THE SCHNEIDER CORPORATION
r><
J. Cort Crosby P.E.
Project Engineer
~
THE SCHNEIDER CORPORATION
Historic Fort Harrison 8901 Otis Avenue Indianapolis, Indiana 46216-1037 317-826-7100 Toll free 800-898-0332 Fax 317-826-7200
- - -- -www.-SGl1neidercorp.com --- --- ------ ---- -
,~
w
w
City of Carmel
FAX: 826-7300
Original by Mail
October 3, 2002
Mr. J. Cort Crosby, P.E.
Schneider Corporation
8901 Otis Avenue
Indianapolis, TIN 46216
COpy
RE: Claybourne, Section 1 and Claybourne "Shelborne"? Estates (Second Review Letter)
Dear Cort:
This letter is in response to the Secondary Plat filing for Claybourne, Section 1 (Plans received May 20, 2002). The
following issues must be resolved prior to signature of the plat by the director:
1. File a separate Secondary Plat application for "Claybourne Estates" which it is my understanding that wants
to be called "Shelbome Estates. We require the file be separated for the new Secondary Plat.
2. The monuments and markers should be as required under Section 8.2 of the SCO.
a. Add concrete monuments at all comers that form the boundary of pla~, as required under SCO
8.2.1 (2). (The comers of Claybourne, Section One need to by concrete.)
b. (It is my understanding that the Highway Department wants the areas in the boulevard within the
right-of-way, not separate blocks. Please advise. HCH Letter dated 6-10-02, comment # one (1).
3. Provide Primary Plat (119-01 PP), and Secondary Plat (??-02 SP) on page one of new plat once issued.
4. Relocate Albert Shaw Legal Drain per approval of Surveyors Office.
5. It appears that the mounding along 13151 Street has changed per the submitted construction set. Please
revise and resubmit. If this impacts the approved landscaping please advise.
6. Forward a copy of the final review letters (post mounding and landscaping modifications) from the
following agencies: Hamilton County Highway, Hamilton County Surveyor, Carmel Utilities Department
7. Add note to plat on public access to trails (see attached example).
8. Reminder: All sidewalks are required to be five (5) feet in width, plans still show four (4) feet. See Carmel
TAC minutes from Feb. 2002.
9. Have Mylar signed by property owner and surveyor (with R.L.S. seal) prior to signature by director.
10. Provide fmal written proposal regarding cost of Road Improvements per Commitment made by owner at
time of Primary Plat. We may request that additional improvements at 13151 Street and Shelbome Road be
made when Section Two is submitted.
Please submit a revised Secondary Plat with the above-mentioned changes. Once these changes have been made and
comments addressed, please produce a mylar copy for signature by this Department. Two paper copies of the plat
must be flIed with the mylar prior to recording, and three paper copies and a mylar of the recorded plat must be
submitted following recording. Our approval of the secondary plat (signature) will be forthcoming upon revision of
the plans according to the items listed above.
1:1: . .
/ ~?~ C. Dobosiewid
Planning Administrator
Claybourne-See I-SP2
ONE CIVIC SQUARE
Page 1
CARMEL, INDIANA 46032
317/571-2417
------------/
2.00201>026697
~~
c(N
(J
3=
.
I")
N
N
!'1
o
(jj
r-ill
I -:
CJ 0
<0
50' R/W
t-
O::'b
::>"':
Or-
U~
~ ?\
- ~
, i ill
, : p
Ir-
~
~
::i
~ ~ I
I
g I
Iii
en
I
<0
N
ill I
<0 .
.w
:g~
V1
.Ill \
::i
ci
'bill
-t" N
r...:
I")
'b
o
Iii
en
.J)'
C', '1I'~_
10
)3'
c1" ""11-02 sP
OOC\<.t;.~' ~ 1" #'1 3B-O'l -pP
PRIl.A~R O"'\t.' 3/5/02
SUBMISS1 ,....
..J
cD
~ 41
'13,275. sC\.it.
S79'17'41"E
140.00'
42
'13,300. sa..ft.
S79'17'41"E
140.00'
.J 4:3
cD '13,303. sa..ft.
in
I")
S82'54'24"E
140.79'
\ \ 44
\ 16,Q13. Sq.lt.
~'L
--
25' D.U.&S.S.E.
_ ,.B3.93'-
128.95'
~
~
'0
r-
-~--
...
...
~
w
,40.00'
I ;::
,0
I !5
o~
I !l ~
~I
' ill
N'-
t'! ~ I
::;:;0
_en
\
51
'I3,4B5. sa.Jt. ..i
ai
'll'I
r')
S88'2' '53"E
, 58.78'
52
'15,562. sa..it.
I
\8
ci
01
I
\'l0i€.: ,0' pU6\.IC PEOE.SiRI~\'l
ERE. S\1A\.l. 6E ~ i€ 5' Ot-l 601\'1
'~CCE.SS EASEI-/IEI~~r~~~E. OOF ~ PEOE.SiR6~~"~.
SlOES Or 1\'IE. C i IS 6UI\. i ~CROSS 61.0
p~1\'IfiR~l\. ~S I
54
'12,600, sa..it,
3
. 2'
N.A.E
~.~,
~
----=
~
~
~
~J:~
is?.9~
;;>-
~
...
c.~. ,2
235,075. sa..ft.
,,~R. o.u.&s.s.E.
&1..NI.~.E.&P.f> .~.E.
S8g~8.~
r - gO'
~B9'~7'OB"S-- ...,
-9CT \
/
j
'",\.
.
"
r~
u
Q
CITY OF CARMEL
Department of Community Services
One Civic Square
Carmel, IN 4SJ32
(317) 571-2417
Fax: (317) 571-2426
Fax
T~,9,cW~,p~
Fax: jJ;;t; - 7300
From:
g~
Pages:
...3
/tJ- .3~ ~
Phone:
Date:
Re:~
o Urgent 0 For Review
ce:
[J Please Comment 0 Please Reply
o Please Recycle
I
'./