The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence ON-SITE EVALUATION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville, IN 46060 Ph: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101 ~. Date: August 5, 2004 Project Name: Clay Terrace Present at Site: John South, Hamilton Co. SWCD; This Report Provided To Mr. Mike Sparks Lauth Fax: 815:8872 Jason Dapp, Gradex Fax: 573:3979 Carmel DOCS File TYPE OF EVALUATION: o Initial X Routine o Follow-up o Complaint This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identify areas where additional measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. All erosion and sediment control measures shall meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents. Current Site Information: Mass grading is nearly completed. Storm sewer is installed. Most buildings are under construction and many of the gravel or paved lots are established. Paving has continued on Rangeline Road. The northern stormwater basin is complete. The fill area on the south side of Rangeline Rd. is to final grade but not seeded. Dirt work north of Walter Road is not seeded or stabilized. The detention basin north of the creek has not been finished. Sediment storage has been restricted by not completing the two basins as scheduled. The construction schedule has the two Stormwater basins completed before the storm sewer is installed. Some of the disturbed areas at the south end of the site have been mulched. The large stock pile at the north end has not been mulched. The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of: S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable Construction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Control U (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and sediment control measures. U (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented. n/a (3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures. M (4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly. M (5) Storm drain inlets have been adequately protected. N/A (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized. M (7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained. M (8) Public & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soil. N/ A (9) Erosion & sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites. Status of Sediment Retention On-Site Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation. o There is evidence of off-site sedimentation. Satisfactory: Marginal: Unsatisfactory: Not Applicable: X Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report Definitions The item is currently in compliance with the Rule A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required Does not apply at this stage of construction Revised 4/98 ~ I I I / ! t: ON-SITE EV ALVA nON FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL COMMENTS PROJECT NAME: ClayTerrace Page 2 Most items are past due. X Install an appropriate sediment control practice between construction areas and lower lying areas. The storm water detention basins need to be installed and finished. o Replace/Repair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers. o Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales. o Remove accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with water) X Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch: Soil stockpiles at the north end of the site and north of Walter Road. X Permanent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are at final grade. The large mound south of the ditch. X Protect storm drain inlets: Xcurb inlets, X drop inlets as inlets are installed. Fabric under the casting is not an approved practice for a functioning inlet. o Reshape and stabilize sideslopes of: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 detention/retention basin InstalllMaintain construction entrance( s): o Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels: Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls (e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be removed (do not flush with water) at the end of each work day. X Other Requirements: (Because of soil problems and electrical power line issues the mass grading has not been completed as scheduled. A revised construction schedule is needed. 4/04) Concerns listed on the April site report have not been addressed. A warning of non-compliance is warranted. This report submitted by: _John B. South_ P.E. Revised 4/98 ~ . . , . EL ~",,/ / /11:-;/ ,( I~,~_, /' ;/ . ~, r~ ---~ , /1' \ ) -,<..J r~T\\ ,t/ . ---.2;.~..:__t"-- June 14,2004 ]Al'vIES BR\lNARD, MAYOR Mr. David George, PE American Consulting, Inc. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256-0270 \~~ ,0). f'V~ RE: Crossroad Engineer's Drainage Review Clay Terrace Retail Center Drainage Plan Revisions Dear Mr. George: The City has engaged Crossroad Engineers, PC, to review storm drainage plans and drainage calculations for all projects submitted to the Department of Engineering for review/comments. Please find the attached copy ofthe Crossroad review completed on May 17, 2004 for the revised Sheets C4.1 and C4.2. Please provide written responses to the comments provided by Crossroad Engineers, PC as they relate to Sheet C4.1 (revision date of March 5, 2004) and Sheet C4.2 (revision date of March 26, 2004). If you have questions, please contact Michael McBride or me at 571-2441. Enclosures cc: File Department of Engineering Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Director of Carmel Utilities DEP"\RDIE:\T OF ENGINEERING O:\E CIVIC SQUARE, CAfL\IEI., 10: 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441 FAX 317.571.2439 [\1..\11. k,,'C'e.,e@ci.GlfInel.in.lIs '; Technical Advisory Committee Engineering Review Checklist for Commercial Designs Project Name: I Clay Terrace Retail Center Owner: Lauth Property Location: S W Corner of 146th Street and U.S. 31 . Section(s): - Date Received: April 19, 2004 - Review Date: May 17,2004 T.A.C. Date: D Primary crJ 15t Revie'w D Construction D T.A.C. Review Drainage o Drainage Approval (City or County) o Detention Required - 10 yr pre / 100 yr post It appears that thereis over 15 acres oj developed ground not accountedJor in the detention calculations. The pre-developed condition exhibit and data show a -iotal oJ 73. 69 acres, "while the proposed exhibit and data only accountJor 57.95 acres. Please explain why the main boulevard is included within the existing basinJor calculating the allowable outflo'rl' rate, but its area is not considered in the proposed condition inflow rate. Please explain why this area is not being diverted through any detention. Based on the letter dated March 29, 2004 it appears that the storage volume within the proposed wetlands has been eliminated, but the stage elevations Jor Pond J have been revised accordingly. Without stage/storage dataJor the wetlands or Pond J, an exact check could not be made to see if storage is adequate; however, the detention areas were modeled in AutoCAD based on the contours shown on the construction plans. It 'was approximated that the volume of the 'wetlands (from 815.50 to 818.04) was 135,400 cft, ...vhile the volume of Pond 1 (from 818.04 to 819.81) is only 106,250 cft. Therefore, it appears that there is a deficiency of approximately 29,150 cft of storage. Based on these assumptions, it does not appear that the revised 100 year flood elevation is correct, especially considering that the outlet weir 'was raised and reduced in size. The revised calculations were not available for reviell/, so they should be supplied and clearly show the revised detention calculations including the outlet structure output report and the stage/storage/discharge report for Pond 1. o Drainage Calculations There are no pipe sizing calculations offeredfor Structure Nos. 101 through 188. Please supply rational method pipe sizing calculations, including the local drainage basin map, for these structures. o Pipe Design - 10 yr flood Yes, the pipes were designedfor a 10-year flood. o Pipe Slopes / Velocities (2.5 fps min, 10 fps max) Minimum pipe velocities hm'e been met for structures included within the drainage calculations; however, a check of the runs between Sir. No. 173 to Sir. No. J 68 and between Str. No. 168 to Str. No. 165 both exceed the maximum of lOfps. Please revise the runs so as to maintain a maximum velocity of J 0 fps. There are a number of runs on the plans that are sho'wn to be placed at aflatter slope than what the drainage calculations specify. As close as some of the designflows are to the full flow capacities. all runs should be reviewed and calculations should be tpdated showing adequate pipe sizingfor the designed slope. o Adequate Lot Drainage Yes. o Surface drainage shown with arrows Yes. o Adequate Easement Widths Yes. o Grading Elevations Shown Yes. o Structures Numbers / Corresponding to Previous Sections The OUtjlOH' structure for the Pond is listed as STR. 644 in the Storm Sewer Profile; however, this structure is listed as STR. 643 in the Storm Sewer Profile and the Drainage Calculations. o Pipe Sizes There are a number of pipe runs that call out a smaller pipe diameter in the plans than what the drainage calculations state. Specifically: 10A, 13, 16, 19, 32, 34, 36, 38, 57, 57A, and 69 are all listed smaller on the plans than in the calculation report. All pipe runs should be reviei-\'ed to ensure adequate pipe sizing is accomplished. o Overflow Location Shown Yes. o Off-Site information (i.e. tying into. sewers in existing sections or preparing for future sections) N/A o Existing s,ewers and structures labeled and/or drawn as such, including as-built elevations - drainage calculations based upon as-built situation, not original plans. Existing information appears to be from a topographical survey. Additional Questions / Comments None. ;. ON-SITE EV ALUA TION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville, IN 46060 Ph:3l7-773-2l8l Fax:3l7-776-ll01 \\ ..\ ~~ \~~/()ct Date: 7-/~D:3 1.4 :,,1/;.~~ :~'" / ~~~.'::;.h t:'j/) 5 LII"~~Vd' ,r; Ie { 4kZYl> TYPE OF EVALUATION: )( Initial 0 Routine 0 Follow-up 0 Complaint This evaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identify areas where additional measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. All erosion and sediment control measures shall meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents. Current Site Information: t1l '4 /. If / I: e, r..ft;t: " 1---/ C/ec//'Jq ~vtd e..Aff~ /5" 75~ ~~/GI-ecY'~ No t"1"l:l-'llw pr .5t'~tM('J ~d;4h I JI4/'L$/ht'tS ,"'sIJ"L The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of: S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable Construction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Control S aiD U NA (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or other appropriate erosion and sediment control measures. S @ U (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented. S M U (3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment control measures. S M U (4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly. S M U (5) Storm drain inlets have been adequately protected. S M U (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized. S M U (7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained. Q) M U A (8) Public & private roadways are being kept clear of accumulated sediment or tracked soil. S M U ~ (9) Erosion & sediment control measures have been installed and maintained on individual building sites. Status of Sediment Retention On-Site o Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation. o There is evidence of off-site sedimentation. Describe: '" Please Refer to the Comments Section of this Report 1 Definitions Satisfactory: The item is currently in compliance with the Rule Marginal: A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance Unsatisfactory: A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required Not Applicable: Does not apply at this stage of construction Revised 4/98 .~~~ ON-SITE EV ALUA nON FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL COMMENTS PROJECT NAME: C /t2V /t!:./'/d/'e I . Page 2 The items checl<ed below must be corrected prior to '7 /~D h,3 , unless otherwise noted. o Install an appropriate sediment control practice between constfuction areas and lower lying areas. o Replace/Repair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers. o Entrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales. o Remove accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet protection devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with water) o Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch: o Permanent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are at final grade: o Protect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inlets o Reshape and stabilize sideslopes of: 0 sediment traps/basins, 0 detention/retention basins o Install/Maintain construction entrance(s): o Reshape and stabilize conveyance channels: o Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors, subcontractors, material vendors, and others should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter sediment controls (e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked into the street shall be removed (do not flush with water) at the end of each work day. o Other Requirements: 2, ,/ -J. .ee~~~nteHd r\PrdjiJ n/Jrse Sht1e.. ~;$~t/Ha~r::: ;P~~_S. jJ/4cL a;d .~/, :7""11.51 rIp/'4'/ elr~~ d ~QJ /J1 ~ l' W4! f~/'5 :J {-rf"" ~ f ~-#I g 111 {;tJJ1r1 nr /21{ 6lr~ s~~ bn II . ~/af d/~I1: H~~~ Uf3~ / This report submitted by: Revised 4/98 u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of C~mmunity'SerVices - - ~' One CIvic Stluare Carmel. IN 4€032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571.2426 Fax T.'~II L:U~ df ' Fax: -5/'..7 Vd70 Fro~ ~ Pages: Re:Ik,,*,/~___c/U/L/~ ~ cc: I o Urgent 0 Far" Review 0 P-lease Comment 0 Please Reply Date: ~. /7- N Phone: C1 Please Recycle tt7-.cV 7' /:/~~ Y2)~ {)~r~~-u-~ u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571.2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax To'c;If ~4~ Fax: 513 -- ~ From~J Pages: ~ Phone: Re: y/ (7 a;?lPli.~' . tJ o Urgent 0 For Review 0 P.lease Comment 0 Please Reply Date: /--/3--- 6<.3 cc: o Please Recycle /'-,. /l .------:- . L. OJ!. 7 /e-4/i---~_.C-tZ- /~~~oa >0y f Page 1 0[2 .. :( Hollibaugh, Mike P From: Brainard, James C Sent: Monday, January 06, 200310:17 AM To: Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: FW: Mr. Joe Downs, V.P Operations, Lauth Property Group I 1t!.6'2 PV? -----Original Message----- From: John Sheerin [mailto:sheerin@core.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 31,200212:10 PM Cc: Brainard, James C; banker@netdirect.net; kcave@lauthproperty.com Subject: Fw: Mr. Joe Downs, V.P Operations, Lauth Property Group c/ Dear Joe, Thanks for taking the time to return my email. I trust you had an enjoyable holiday. I appreciate your offer to meet, but unless it is to tell me how you plan to remove the high traffic road now in the plans just 50 ft. from our subdivision property line, I'm not sure I see the point of spending further time on this with you. I am confident you understood our initial concerns at the outset when we objected to enabling a short cut for the high school kids to take around the perimeter of your property as they come back across Meridian on Rangeline from the high school and bypass the center lane of traffic in favor of taking the short cut along the back of the property line on the western border of the proposed development, exiting onto 146th. This enables high traffic counts to go very close to our property fine creating another source of traffic noise as well as creating a dangerous intersection with constant exit traffic only 250 ft. from our subdivision entrance. Your understanding of this was evidenced by the fact you removed this exit from your plans prior to the rezone hearing as per our neighborhood wishes, funnelling all traffic back onto the 5 lanes available on the new Rangeline Road through the middle of the development. '"'- "'.,,,-~.. Ci' I don't know what else can be said, either it's in as it stands now or out as per our initial understanding when you changed the plans to accommodate us and win our support for your rezone. Either you can see your way clear to stick your original representations or you don't. Seems pretty straight forward to me. A further explanation of your position isn't going to protect our property values. I have a question for you on your interpretation of the "Notification Ordinances" within the Carmel City Limits. In my initial consult with a partner in a prominent Indianapolis law firm, he seemed to think the notification statutes provided that notice should be given to anyone in the neighborhood within the greater of 2 city lots or 600 ft. I told him if that were the 01/06/2003 Page 2 of2~l case that there are several of my neighbors at the 425 ft. mark from your development that did not receive the original rezone notice or any other subsequent notices. These folks are pretty upset they haven't been notified as they are on wells, also and would have remonstrated against the retention ponds. I offered to my legal counsel, that surely with all the resources you had expended on this so far, having had us in for meetings on three separate occasions with your entire legal staff present and all the investment you had made on optioning the land that I was confident you would have done your homework on this, as this would be grounds for the entire rezone to be set aside. I couldn't imagine that would be the case. He said he would check on it for me after the first of the year, but I was curious to hear your take on this. I see that you are interpreting it as an "either/ or" situation not lithe greater of' as he did on my initial meeting. Sincerely, c John Sheerin ----- Original Message ---- From: Downs. Joe To: John Sheerin Sent: Monday, December 30,20029:19 AM Subject: RE: Mr. Joe Downs, V.P Operations, Lauth Property Group John, I've just returned from vacation. I'd like to meet with you to discuss your e-mail in detail. Thanks and just let me know a time and a place where we could get together. Hope you had a great holiday. -----Original Message----- c~ 01/06/2003 JAN-02-2e03 10:49 FROM:HAMILTON ~HWY DEP 3177769814 TO:3175712426 P.e01/001 - -\.T-"-'~'-"-- HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT January 2, 2003 Mr. David George American Consu";ng Inc. 7260 Shadeland Statfon Indianapolis, Indiana 46256 RE: Clay Terrace Construction Plans 5 of 1461h Street I W of US 31 Clay Township Dear Mr. George: .t: ~~CfiV~ DOCS '''. This letter serves to acknowledge receipt of a transmittal received 12110/02 containing the plans for the above-mentloned project. After reViewing the plans the Highway Department has the following comments: 1. It appears that all comments concerning the conceptual design of the project have been satisfactorily addressed. 2. Please note that future comments will be necessary for this project durIng the design of the associated streets. All construction plans will need to be submitted for review by the Highway Department. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter. please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sf"1l1 J'~J- 4: J. Broermann Staff Engineer cc: Jon Doboslewlcz Jenny Chapman G:\USl';~S\SB\031ac\O'-o3-D3C1a~lT8ce.doc 1700 South 10.h Stnlet NoblesvtlJe, In. 460fi0 www.l:o.hamllt.o..n.fn.us Office (317) 773-7770 Fal[ (317) 776.9814 'I Fax { """';r W'J..,: CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4Sl32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Toyll ~~ Fax: 6m ()=?7o Fro"" ~ Pages: \...3 .,~ Phone: ~7 ,,/ ...'" 0..' Re: ~ ~.Ut, .' Date: /- 02 - t23 yJ;pvj'N.,~ cc: o Urgent 0 For' Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle o!t~~>-/~. /:/'~~ ~ r9 cT~) --;-~~ ~' Fax u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4SJ32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 To, J# ~7~~ Fax: ...5~.3 - ax 70 Phone: Re: .:5u6d0:S/?'/; ,1--:J~~ CC: 2t?ce<z~ A0. /#.,-- tJ~ ~ C7/a-y ~r/a.oe/ u 12/16/2002 15:14 FAX 3178486519 U LAUTH PROPERTY u III 002/002 A& F ENGINEERING CO., LLC. ENGINEERS a PLANNERS - ~___ t... JrA...-.'ftiUrIIM-IIJIrIIl:.'r........ _ ~. __CIIIIIl:II--..: _,,,-11I 1'IlIl1ll"'~-. 'IIW'..ullC.............- ~~IJIC.~_~ f . WII.L.IAM .J. .II:MR..A.... "'B. ..- 1Il~ -- .....- - --.. MOl..- - STII:VIEN J. raHRIMCH. p.t;. YI~ ..._...-r l)e(;ember 13,2002 Joseph Downs Lauth Property Graup 9771 N. College Ave. lDdianapolis. IN 46280 Re: Clay Centelr Dear Mr. Downs: p.j you ICquc:sted. llulve revIewed the. current development plan for your Clay Center project. 1be current platt taUs within acceptable limits with reprdl to the 1l'8ffic study prepared for the City of Carmel Plau c;ommissioD. If you have any questions or comments. please contact this office. Sincerely. A&.F Engineering Co-, u..c C!ltc Vice President wmw t AI I" 84S ICEYIifONE CROS81...G. BUI'I"E 20V - INDIANAPO,"'., INDIANA ..UD - 1'ELEPMONE (317) auv.-uDS4 FAC:SIMILE (31'7') aoa-0808 a""TV8lln.TTK\~~ ..nav onRn~n7'T~ TV~ e~:~T ~n/r.t/7.t LAUTH PROPERTY III 0011002 12/16/2002 15:14 FAX 3178486519 W Q ~ /./\i0:JJlf~)J .' ~ / \ ,/ ...1/ ~ /.(;--',)/ ',-. ,<>; ~ 1'</ ~ ~/, .........JI' '\ ,,/'"' .. II ,J ~~ '\~~ ,LAUrn PROPERTY. Q~>~~ ,~~- \...\ GRlOUP '-"'I \" '\~ 1..-. : _\ . ,,\' \0 !.... j \'.\ \:3\,:0 C'\,->S F) ~ ""tJr \---'\ \)\.> i'hi AN N1V~RSAR"" \-i:~", /</ ..till!!. '-' '..; /-'.". /V"/ "<,./ 7-"""" _....."~< \, ,/ "<!J.l} ":~\,~,~;\.-Y FACSIMILE COVER SHEET I COMPANY FAX: (317) 571-2426 PHONE: CC: , ~OM: Ol'a S. (Joe) Downs i FAX'dBY: Laura Ziegler FA.X: 317-564-3076 PRONE: 317-575-3076 DATE: 12/16/02 TO: Jon Doboslewitz Transmitting g pages, including cover sheet. W:ltIIIagl C..., ,..nil NlIIkel 'IlIi& _ ...... llIId dIo mawrbIs BCICl1Cd wIdl dIIs lrlIMlIIuIOII ate tllc pdVIIIC. alIIlldeDdlII pnlpOIl1 of ibo ]<lIDlIor. lIIIII dlll llIlIlUIlIIIlIIIt p1vl1op1 COlIIIlIUIIIClliClllS III_cd 50101)' Jar l1li> tcClOlpI, ,... boaeIIllIIId IlllbImlaoa 0' IlullaIaratcd l\:CIplClll iIIlIk.alod a/looG. If ~ In not 11m iollalcled toeIpJem. 10\1 :mlllonlly llIlIItIcd d1lll1117 mlow, dllOlor-_ CllWlD!l-lII8aIImlon. ar Ibt rdIDJ flfllDYodr:r rlIlIloIlla zeIiIIIIlO ~ It. t_ o1d11t n~1IIIIaa illlrdcl4' pIlIbI\lIlId. -lII:I)' JCSuIl bIlegAI nablllty 011 yoar pllR. If yallllaVC ta1/lll1/lll1r.lllSllllAlol1a error. ,leulllOlltf Il!I imJJIcd.ial..ly IlI.Ibo lb_lMphoM _llIlG lIIrllllllO 1Or..1III1I ortldlltllllllll,... 10.... COMMENTS: Please S99 attached 9777 N- College Ave. IndiIl11apoli5. IN 46280 (317) 848-6500 f.t (317) 848-6511 www.lauthpropeny.com Fax u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4E032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 ~f1~ 1/3 - 7J;l.'1D From: ~- Pag... ~~. ~ Date: /~ . J:J.. -o:/. To: Fax: Phone: Re: ~tItt ~ cc: o Urgent 0 For Review 0 P.lease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle ~ 1.fMUL- /J-p/O:2. rbP ./ \,,-:- December 5, 2002 A. LAUTH PROPERTY · GROUP · ~ ~tlt ANNIVERSARY -' ....J ,/-:--\- ),-. i;--;-'>, ;::'" \ ~._,-, j"" . }':/v- ---~, ~,~,-:' ,. ." l-:);>/ ~ "~:~\, ('1 RECFIVED \:~\ I~ DI:-n 9 r;r'Q'l f; ,.j \.:::~ lJ. tJ, L f::': ,'-J DOCS' - ! \::,,'\ \.,/ '" \\</;:>~ ,( j I ! \. / ..- A. ..... J. Bryon Nicol Commissioner Indiana Department of Transportation 100 N. Senate Avenue, Room N755 Indianapolis, IN 46204 Re: _Chly_Terrace._RetailDevelopment- 146th Street and US31 Mr. Nicol, Relative to your ongoing study of the US31 corridor north of 1-465, our site consultant had the opportunity to recently (12/3/02) review with Parsons the current schematics being considered by them as possible interchange geometric options. We recognize other options may also be considered prior to submittal of the DEIS and subsequent Public Hearing. The three schematics could be generally described, as they affect our development; i.e., the SW quadrant of 146th and US31, as follows: I. MIS Study Plan, providing a SB US31 entrance/exit to new Rangeline Road south of 146th Street to the west, with "Y" R/W take shown. 2. A SB loop ramp from US31, with loop in the SW quadrant of 146th and US31. This loop along with a SB "on" leg would eliminate Rangeline Road connection to 146th Street from south. 3. A "tight diamond" interchange ramp system, providing SB "on" to US31 from 146th Street at our project's location, the SW quadrant of 146th and US31. You need to be aware of fact that our development plan allows for future R/W considerations per the available schematic plans for both first and third alternative as identified above. Our buildings and parking, as currently presented will not be compromised by either of these schemes. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call me at 317-575-3088. Sincerely, W.H. 'Mark' Jang Senior Project Manager 9777 N. College Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46280 ph 317.848.6500 fx 317.848,6511 www.lauthproper9..com Building Real Estate Solutions. Since 1977 I' r .j / CC: File JonDobosiewicz - Carmel Planning Administrator David George - ACE Robert Rydell - Lauth Joe Downs - Lauth Pat Shea - Lauth Gary Shelton - Lauth A. LAUTH PROPERTY . . _~-~L"I~I_ft- December 5, 2002 ~.J~~ r --~. W'~!..a.. e-- ~ ~- ~ I',' - ~: \'. \'\:s\ r'. ,,'.' c (: ~ '.' \ ,'\' . ~t ~ .' \)'t . r'C. \; \j v;) Mr. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator City of Cannel One Civic Square Cannel, IN 46032 Re: Clay Terrace Retail Development (PUD Ordinance No. Z-386-02) Preliminary Site Plan Approval Plan review comment letters dated November 26, 2002. Mr. Dobosiewicz, Below are correlated itemized responses to above stated letter are as follows: 1. Kick off meeting with the Hamilton County Engineers and their consultants were held on November 27, 2002 to discuss Rangeline Road. The Rangeline Road design will incorporate the Traffic Study, which was part ofPUD package. Once the Rangeline Road design document is ready for issuance, we will forward necessary copies for your review and comment. 2. Although "Plat Vacation of Walter's Plaza Replat" was submitted, timing of approval may be past PDP review and approval by the Plan Commission on December 17, 2002. Therefore we request Plan Commission's review and approval is based on ratification of "Plat Vacation of Walter's Plaza Replat". 3. "Plat Vacation of Walters Rolling Acres" will be submitted, timing of approval may be past PDP review and approval by the Plan Commission on December 17,2002. Therefore, we request Plan Commission's review and approval based on ratification of "Plat Vacation of Walters Rolling Acres". 4. The current site plans dated December 5, 2002, will reflect following: . North detention pond will encroach into Frontage Road R-O- W and future US31 off ramp easement. We will reconstruct the detention pond, maintaining designed capacity, if INDOT pursues US31 off ramp in lieu of 146th Street off ramp. . Sliver of southern parking lot, east of Rangeline Road, encroaches into the Frontage Road R-O- W. We will apply for the Encroachment Permit for the above stated items. We request that Plan Commission's review and approval is based on issuance of the Encroachment Permit. 5. Same as Item #2 above. 6. Preliminary Development Plan review comments: a. Drainage calculation will be submitted to the Cannel Engineering Department for review and approval on December 6,2002. We request that Plan Commission's review and 9777 N, College Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46280 ph 317,848.6500 fx 317.848.6511 www.lauthproperry.com Building Real Estate Solutions. Since 1977 approval is based on ratification of the drainage calculation with Carmel Engineering Department. b. Sidewalk along East of the Rangeline Road is reflected in our submittal drawings by ACE, dated December 5, 2002. c. An exhibit illustrating parking area and landscaping area, in order to comply to PUD requirements, set forth in Section 7.2 -C, is be part of our submittal drawings. d. Submittal drawings by ACE dated December 5, 2002, will comply with 30' landscape buffer between US31 R-O- Wand South detention pond. e. Submittal drawings by ACE dated December 5,2002, will show future easements for both US31 and 146th Street ramps. f. Submittal drawings by ACE dated December 5, 2002, will comply to landscaping requirements per PUD Section 7.2 - A for the two (2) standalone buildings (Restaurant and Financial Institution located south end of the property), defined under section 6.4- A. All other buildings are integral part of the Rangeline Road streetscape development, therefore, will comply with Section 7.2 - F. g. Submittal drawings by ACE dated December 5, 2002, will reflect 90' set back from US31 for the "Restaurant". h. Signage at US31 is relocated, outside of the US31 R-O-W. 1. Location of all other signage is forthcoming as part of Final Development Plan and will also be reviewed during ADLS. J. See attached letter from ACE dated December 5, 2002 in response to the County's letter dated November 19,2002. 7. See enclosed "Tree Preservation Plan" by Vine and Branch, dated December 5, 2002 8. See attached cover letter to INDOT, dated December 5, 2002, requesting review and comment on the Preliminary Development Plan. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call me at 317-575-3088. Sincerely, ~~ W.H. 'Mark' Jang Senior Project Manager CC: File Bv~~ 'd~? Steve Broermann - Hamilton County Highway Department Mike Howard - Attorney for Hamilton County Kate Weese - Carmel City Engineer Michael Hollibaugh - Department of Community Services Director David George - ACE Robert Rydell Joe Downs Pat Shea Gary Shelton At ~ 7260 SHADE LAND STATION INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA 46256-3957 (317) 547-5580 FAX (317) 543-0270 www.amercons.com )AMES A. WURSTER, PE, AlA, LS WILLIS R. CONNER, PE JAMES A. KOVACS, ES GREGORY L. HENNEKE, PE CHARLES P. UNTERREINER, PE, PS RANDAL J. SAGE, PE MAX P. NEWKIRK, LS A. ROY SHURTLEFF, PE MICHAEL H. WENNING, PE CLINTON L. SPARKS, PE GORDON L. RICHARDSON, LS DAVID A. DAY, PE MICHAEL R. HOOPINGARNER, AlA MICHAEL M. JONES, AlA CYNTHIA L. FORT, PE JEFFREY A. CLAYTON, PE ROBERT E. HITllE, ES MARLIN A. KNOWLES, JR., PE MICHAEL J. KOYAK, PE FRED M FACKENTHAL, AlA JAMES K. KEEFE, PE JOSEPH). GUIDROZ III, AlA SlEVEN R. BRUNS, PE ROBERT E. CREVISTON, JR., AlA EDWARD J. SWEETLAND, LS CASH E. CANFIELD, PE DONALD G. CORSON, PE ALEN FETAHAGIC, PE jAMJE L. POCZEKAY, PE MICHAEL B. CLINE, PE M. SEAN PORTER, PE PAUL A. ENDRlS /I, RA WEBB BERNHAlRDT, PE MICHAEL S. HARKNESS, PE WILLIAM J. BOUCHER, PE CHRISTOPHER F. MURPHY, PE DALE T. (SKIP) FRANCIS, PE GREGORY R. SUSEMICHEL, PE SABER ATMAR, PE PffiR M. HODAPp, PE KATHLEEN M. BERGER, RLA DAVID A. SMITH, AlA KEITH A. CORBAN, PE ROBERT S. BROWN, PE MICHAEL T. LATZ, PE THOMAS W. CANCILLA, AlA RUSSELL L. BUECHE, AlA JOHN N. HOOD, LS ASVIN MANDADI, PE ANDREW D. RENTSCHLER, PE JENNIfER M. ALFORD, PE PAUL DENNY, PE MICHAEL L. BISHOp, LS DAVID C. GEORGE, PE CRAIG M. PARKS, PE REGISTRATION INDIANA - OHIO KENTUCKY - MICHIGAN ILLINOIS - MISSOURI MARYLAND - ARKANSAS . SOUTH DAKOTA -IOWA NEBRASKA. KANSAS TENNESSEE - WISCONSIN FLORIDA - WEST VIRGINIA GEORGIA - MISSISSIPPI PENNSYLVANIA - IDAHO VIRGINIA - MINNESOTA COlORADO - CALIFORNIA ARIZONA - WASHINGmN ALABAMA - NEW YORK NEW JERSEY. LOUISIANA UTAH - MASSACHUSETTS SOUTH CAROLINA. TEXAS CONNECTICUT - MAINE OFFICES INDIANAPOLIS, IN COlUMBUS, OH q:\emp\dcg\O 1 0634-002.doc AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers December 5, 2002 Mr. Steven Broermann Hamilton County Highway Department 1700 South lOth Street Noblesville, IN 46060 Re: Clay Terrace South of 146th StreetlWest of US 31 ClayTownship, Carmel, Indiana Dear Mr. Broermann: We received your comment letter dated November 19,2002. The following are responses to each of your comments. Corrections to the plans have been made where appropriate. 1. An 85-foot half right-of-way section is already noted along 146th Street east of Rangeline Road. The half right-of-way section to the west of Rangeline Road is less than 85 feet.. Lauth has agreed to dedicate the necessary land to make an 85-foot half right-of-way section. The plans note this. 2. The path east of Rangeline Road has been moved south out of the limited access right-of-way. 3. Amenities will be installed based on agreements with the City of Carmel and their maintenance agreement with Hamilton County. 4. We will design utility connections to not interfere with a right turn. 5. The right-of-way line for a possible ramp is noted on the plans near the parking lot on the east side. If a ramp is installed and the area is needed, the parking lot can be reconfigured at such time. 6. The right-of-way near the future intersection has respected all agreed-to ramp configurations. 7. The right-of-way for the possible ramps is shown on the plans. 8. All travelIanes are shown as 12-foot width. The median is shown as 14-foot width. 9. The water feature can be configured to accommodate either ramp option. 10. It is understood that further comments may be necessary. Very truly yours, American Consulting, Inc. ~dA/id, C. ~ David C. Geo~ge, PE DCG:mgn ARCHITECTURE STRUCTURAL CIVIL ENVIRONMENTAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SURVEYING FORENSIC ENGINEERING @ Shell Pipeline Company LP 3022 Bear Ridge Drive Wentzville, MO 63385 December 3, 2002 Mr. Mark Jang Senior Project Manager Lauth Property Group 9777 N. College Avenue Indianapolis, IN 46280 Re: Hamilton County, Indiana - Proposed Landscaping Plan Shell12-lnch & 8-lnch Pipelines - RlW1082 Clay Terrace Development - 146th Street & US Hwv. 31 - Carmel. Indiana CONDITIONAL LETTER OF NO OBJECT.ION Dear Mr. Jang, This is to respond to your request regarding Shell Pipeline Company's approval of your proposed Landscaping Plan, being a part of your overall proposed development within the subject tract. We have reviewed your plan and we do not object to your landscaping proposal, upon the following conditions: . No trees will be planted within Shell's restricted Easement. . Shell will not be denied access to the pipeline within this area. . For routine maintenance procedures requiring excavation within this area, Shell will coordinate this activity with the owner's designated person. Shell will provide as much advanced notice as practical, in the event the owner desires to remove any landscape plantings within this area. . Shell will not be responsible for the replacement of any landscape plantings, as a result of exercising any of our granted rights within this area. This "Conditional Letter Of No Objection" does not replace nor limit Shell Pipeline Company LP, and any successors, of any and all rights granted within our Easement. Re\f2i:jIlY, !n L. T eriet Sr. Land Agent Jlteriet@shellopus.com 636-639-6839 (office) 636-639-9340 (fax) 636-399-2456 (cell) u Q CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices " , One Civic Square Carmel, IN. 4E032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2425 Fax To'7fff ,dy-J Fax: '-~ -OX?d . From: ~ ~. Pages: Phone: Date: /01- &'.-O~ Re' ~1fr::;0;:;! fi~ eel dd~/,,~L-C"~ /~fL'-C::? p..2J P ./1 -. u u ~ City of Carmel VIA FAX: 848-6511 Mr. Joe Downs Vice President, Development Lauth Property Group 9777 N. College Ave. Indianapolis, Indiana 46280 C~Pl' November 26, 2002 RE: Clay Terrace, Coordination of required approvals & Development Plan Review Dear Joe: This letter is designed to bring greater clarity to the process of approval for the Clay Terrace project. The following comments need to be addressed and/or plans/applications updated accordingly: 1. Carmel TAC has not seen plans for the construction of Range Line Road. Provide plans for improvements to Rangeline Road including south of US 31 for review by TAC. These plans should include an update to the Traffic Study prepared at the time of the rezone based on the improvements that are now being proposed. 2. The plat vacation of Walter's Plaza Replat has been submitted. Approval must occur prior to approval of the PDP by the Plan Commission. 3. A Plat Vacation must be filed for Walters Rolling Acres (area where Carmel Motel used to stand) where Range Line Road and storm water facilities will be constructed. 4. A request needs to be filed with the Carmel City Council to vacate the existing frontage road. The proposed Preliminary Development Plan with detention ponds, parking areas, and a building encroaching into this area cannot be approved by the Plan Commission until the City Council vacates this area ofr-o-w. As part of this request you should provide an explanation as to why the City would desire to vacate the right-of-way to a private entity so the State, County, or even City would have to come back later and reacquire it for the anticipated improvements to US 31 regardless which ramp option is chosen. I would encourage an alternative of perhaps requesting a reduced setback and/or an encroachment into the frontage road right-of-way. It is not likely the City will vacate this right-of-way. 5. A request needs to be filed with the Carmel City Council to vacate the portion of Walter Street you desire to be vacated. The Preliminary Development Plan as proposed with setbacks cannot be approved by the Plan Commission until the City Council vacates this area ofr-o-w. Page 1 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 ~ u (:.,) ",- 6. Preliminary Development Plan review: a. Drainage calculation must be submitted to the Carmel Engineering Department for review and approval prior to approval of the Preliminary Development Plan. b. Illustrate pathways along Rangeline Road. c. Add additional islands in parking lots to break up long, continuous stretches or parking spaces. Six (6) percent of total parking area is required per the PUD, provide an exhibit illustrating this. d. A 30' landscape buffer is required between ponds I parking and the US 31 r-o-w. e. Add both ramp areas and delineate the required landscape setbacks. f. Provide the required landscape areas adj acent to the standalone building at the northwest comer ofthe site and all other stand alone buildings. g. The building on the plans identified as "Restaurant" is set 56' from the existing US 31 r-o-w. The PUD required a 90'setback. Revise building location. h. Remove the proposed signs at the Range Line IUS 31 intersection from the right-of- way. 1. Provide the location of all other ground signs on the plans. J. Respond to comments contained within the letter from the County Highway Department dated November 19, 2002. 7. Provide a specific report on how the proposed plan conforms to Section 13 of the PUD Ordinance regarding tree preservation in future ramp area. 8. Forward a letter with Preliminary Development Plan attached to the State (INDOT) requesting any and all comments. Copy DOCS on this letter. The above comments are based on the information submitted to date. Please forward a copy of this letter to your design team and attorneys. Sincerely, !tn I~ / JO~ C. Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator Cc: Steve Broermann, Hamilton County Highway Department Kate Weese, Carmel City Engineer Michael Hollibaugh, Department of Community Services Director Michael A. Howard, Attorney for Hamilton County Page 2 ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 l - I C-t\V\'l-\ U U , 1/ ;J.,0/07-. I I - ! ~ I I , ....) t>~~~ , MA.M1 I '(~ ~ ~, ~~. , 'II" ~ 7 I I ~. I 1i I I i I G,l' 11-. .:S'c.e1T: p~~ ~c....~&c. I 8. I : I - ! Co. I I to' ,", - .' r . ; I. i, I' '~-I~_Pd6c~~(6'\.~ .. k4"')_ ~-(~ ~ I ? "'l"'-V~ 'i~ .s.F'. Q ~_ to ~ I "I -CD-~ ~&~ fi~ ~_~t L~r_ttc.~_ 8r' Co._~IJ7Y.? I @2w~ ~ : .~ 1.-0-'" ,~d._ ~'400\ -n '-- .~._._,-~-------- , &~I~ en- ~\ , I (j;) 31 ct -o-w a. ~S1l3~,L~ .._______K_.___-_________ i - --------- , ! ~, .. - - ---- . -_.._--- - I - I , ~1 ... PROJECT NAME: EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTR PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org I L/~.-J () p Clay Terrace Construction Plan SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Joe Downs Lauth Property Group 9777 N. College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46280 Mr. Jeff Clayton . American Consulting 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256 REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 11/19/02 Acreage: ?? LOCATION: SW corner of US3 I and 146th Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 24 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 44 The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. X Refer to the comments section for additional information. Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted: Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4/97 .. ... ~ ~- EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTR6r?PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT: Clay Terrace Page 2 of2 Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents. Comments- The existing wells neeed to be abandon according to local and state statue. A full erosion and sediment control plan needs to be approved by the Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District prior to any earthwork, demolition or clearing activity. The erosion control plan for this project should be broken down into several plans to address the different stages of construction. A stilling basin is recommended to slow and spread the flow from the 30" outfall pipe at the southwest comer of the site. The proposed topo lines would be helpful for review of this project. Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor Ha. Co. Highway File '....-;- 11/19/02 14:28 FAX November 19, 2002 HAMILTON CO HWY. ~~~ Carmel DOCD ~ 001/002 HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPNffMENT -; Y '*' /' [~?' RECFIVED "',\ (t~!j.. NOV 19 2002 \~\ DOCS /~~~/ '<'~,~ <(:;?/ ~lJlrJll~9Y Mr. Michael Jett American Consulting Inc. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, Indiana 46256 RE: Clay Terrace Construction Plans S of 146th Street / W of US 31 Clay Township Dear Mr. Jett: This letter serves to acknowledge receipt of a transmittal received 11/8102 containing the plans for the above-mentioned project. After reviewing the plans the Highway Department has the following comments: 1. In accordance with the Hamilton County Thoroughfare Plan, additional right of way is required at this location along 131st Street. An 85' half right of way is required from the centerline of 146th Street. The 85' is needed 500' from the intersection in both the east and west direction. Belond the 500' a 70' half if required. 2. The path shown along 146 Street will not be permitted to cross the limited access right of way that is presently in place. 3. Please note that decorative signs, sprinkler systems, trees, landscaping mounds, c1ght poles or other such amenities are not permitted in the right of way. 4. he area near the intersection of 146'" Street and Rangeline Road must be left clear of all utilities, landscaping and any other structures which would prohibit the f:'\ installation of a right turn lane from 146'" Street to Rangellne Road. ~ The par1<lng lot on the east side of the project near US 31 may need to be reconfigured to allow for the proper centertine radius to be installed as a part of the tt;1 ramp project. .l!.J. The buildings, which are planned for the area near the future Intersection of the ramp project and Rangellne Road, must be constructed in areas that would allow for a ~ continuous turning movement at the intersection. ~ The areas at the future intersection of the ramp and Rangellne Road will need to be distinguished in some manner to note that the area will be removed when the ramp from US 31 is constructed. The right otway for the ramps will need to be shown on the construction plans for the Clay Terrace Project. 8. All travel lanes shown in the typical section, including the left turn lane, will need to be 12' in width. The medians in the street parking section will need to be a minimum of 14' from face to face of curb. ~ The location of the water feature in the northeast corner must be located in an area ~at does not interfere with the future ramp project. '~ .ease note that future comments may be necessary for this project. 1700 Soutb 10" Street Noblesvllle, In. 46060 www.co.bamllton.in.us Office (3] 7) 773-7770 Fax (317) 776-9814 1 11/19/02 14:29 FAX HAMILTON CO BWY. ~~~ Carmel DOCD ~ 0021002 /---,~,~ -T-/"'>~ /~ \ ----L' I r:::; '. .'<1 A. /. ~ \~?\ BECF\\!ED \2\ \:.J\! 19 2QQ2 )~~)I DOCS .c:l .~.','j '\. '/ ,\ /...../ If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, ~/3-- Steven J. Broennann Staff Engineer cc: Jon Dobosiewicz Jenny Chapman G:\USERS\SB\02T AC\11-19-02clayterrace.doc -- ~ ~- ~- -~--~ --- r ~ - N u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of C<Jmmunity Seavices One Civic Square Carmel. IN 4aJ32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax TO' >>f: ~ F~ - -_~~-(};;;ZO Phone: ..5 n - .5.5 [10 From~ ~ Pages: r2 ~ ~ Date: /1-/.:2- -~ L- Re: cc~ o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply CI Please Recycle 'l/ft!- ~ u Carmel November 12, 2002 Michael B. Jett American Consulting, INC. 4165 Millersville Road Indianapolis, IN 46205-2998 u RE: Clay Terrace Project Number: IN2001-0634 Dear Mr. Jett: /'f~~-\l~~~,~ /\ ""'- '.-.'- I J.. '-.. (., \'v>.-'v-- -'- <:~.<:)\\ I.:;' {~// "'<~/'~\ /..,,l c--I \(' \, (__J 0 g ','>'\ ! i.IC-J./"\ ,-,.\ ("" ....... c:.s '.' '-j 2: co L= -. ... u.-....... 0 ,) \5~\ ~ ~ 0 l-~1 \'/\ ~~ 1'1 'y/'\. ~ /":!' \..-::' ~"" /'. "i.' "{ ,. '.....~" /.-'\ '. ;/' <..(,)Z~~,:T~G~// I have received and reviewed the plans submitted for the above-mentioned project. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforce- ment efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, ~D."~ Michael D. Fogarty -'-"-1 Chief of Police MDF:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services (317) 571-2500 A Nationally Accredit rcement Agency Fax (317)571-2512 u Fjla~n~:',8.ndie F:'ipf~~~Pp.. t::(). \i:::!':: PO c''')r",",r):;::JI'I'' F':>C"j'lj;+;P<:OU . .....- .Iv 1",., I-".J. ~"f . \;\ ~ lt~...~_ involved ~ thisnproject A~ si~t11a~ --LJi!{ ~^ Rtrf-~~J::" CARMEL/CLAY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENiiA DOc,r' . . ,J Date: November 20, 2002 Place:Department of Community Services Conference Room 3rd Floor - Carmel City Hall 9'00 ~ m 9''-0 ~ m 9':'i0~ m 10''-0 ~ m 10'40 ~ m 11 '00 ~ m 11 ''-0 ~ m 11 . ~O P m Proposed Wireless Communication Towers - Crooked Stick Golf Course Special Exception Application I The applicant seeks approval to construct three wireless communication towers. ,<) C- The site is located between Ditch Road and Towne Road, north of 106th Street. Filed by Joseph M. Scimia of Baker & Daniels for AT & T. Riverview Medical Park PUD (Rezone) The applicant seeks to rezone 11.09 acres to a Planned Unit Development district. 1: The site is zoned S-1 (Residential). C- Filed by Charles D. Frankenberger for Plum Creek Partners, LLC. Hamilton Crossing Building #6 (Development Plan) The applicant seeks approval to construct an office building. The site is generally 4'''' located on the south side of 131 at St. between U.S. 31 and Meridian Comers Blvd. ~ Filed by Blair D. Carmosino of Duke Realty Corporation. Pennsylvania and 12200 Street - Northeast Comer (Rezone) The applicant seeks to rezone 28.378 acres zoned R-l (Residential) and M-3 4. (Manufacturing) to B-6 (Business). The site is located at the northeast comer of 12200 Street and Pennsylvania Road. Filed by Blair D. Carmosino of Duke Realty Corporation. Lakeside Park, Section:r.o (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans) The site is located on the southwest comer of West 141st Street and Towne Road. 4 The site is zoned S-I/Residence - Very Low Density. C Filed by Dennis Olmstead of Stoeppelwerth & Associates. Village of Mount Carmel, Section 10 (primary Plat) The applicant is proposing a 5-10t subdivision. The site is located at the southwest t .JC- comer of 146th Street and Village Drive. l. \ Filed by Chuck Wright of the Elliot Wright Group, LLC. Clay Terrace (preliminary Development Plan) The applicant seeks approval of a preliminary development plan. The site is located i at the southwest comer of US Highway 31 and East 146th Street. Filed by Jeff Clayton of American Consulting, Inc. for the Lauth Property Group. Carmel High School Campus (Plat Vacation, r-o-w vacation and grant) 4- The applicant seeks to vacate a portion Carmelwood Subdivision, vacate and dedicate new right-of-way in order to modify the Carmel High School Campus. Filed by Allen Cradler ofFanningIHowey Associates for Carmel Clay Schools. .~ 'f W Q AMERICAN CONSUL TING, INC. /4 " Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547~5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Robert Hendricks Hamilton County Local Emergency Planning Committee 1717 Pleasant Street, Suite 100 Noblesville. IN 46060 Date: Project Name: Project Number: We are [gI Enclosed sending you: 0 Separately via o Mail [gI Messenger o Overnight o Deliver by: Time: Date: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001~0634 [gI As Requested o For Your Information [gI For Your Review & Comment o QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans / Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. By: Michael B. Jett l ! ,< ....~ u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Andy Kerns Clay Township Regional Waste District 10701 N. College Avenue Suite A Indianapolis, IN 46280 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed D Separately via D Mail IZI Messenger D Overnight IZI As Requested D For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Liflig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .~ U' U -f ." f AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Jeff Farmer Time Warner Cable 3030 Roosevelt Avenue Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Indianapolis, IN 46218 We are ~ Enclosed D Mail ~ As Requested sending you: D Separately via ~ Messenger D For Your Information Deliver by: D Overnight ~ For Your Review & Comment Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .. ~'~1. U u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Pam Waggoner Indianapolis Water COmpany 1220 Waterway Blvd Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 I ndianapolis. IN 46206 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed D Separately D Mail IZI As Requested via IZI Messenger D For Your Information D Overnight IZI For Your Review & Comment D D Deliver by: Time: Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans , Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ..f tl'''"' U u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ron Morris IP&L 3600 North Arlington Avenue Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-o634 Indianapolis, IN 46218 We are ~ Enclosed sending you: D Separately via D Mail ~ Messenger D Overnight ~ As Requested D For Your Information ~ For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans " Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .- ',II... u (.) AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Brian Houghton Jones & Henry 2420 N. Coliseum Blvd Suite 214 Fort Wayne, IN 46805 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 We are IZI Enclosed o Mail IZI As Requested sending you: o Separately via IZI Messenger o For Your Information Deliver by: o Overnight IZI For Your Review & Comment Time: 0 0 Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans . Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett . '.......~). ,....,....-'" /.. W v AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Sharon Prater Panhandle Eastern Pipeline COmpany P.O. Box 38 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Zionsville, IN 46077 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed D Separately D Mail IZI As Requested D For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment via IZI Messenger Deliver by: D Overnight Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ..IJ- )XMERICA~ CONSUL fING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com /'\~'~. .,~, , \ -,. I 1/.0:::, ~:,:>)/"~~-'-----''''---'~~ ''''. LETTER OF TRANSMITTJY~ <.') y~\ - I <~\/ r{) \:-- '. /I_j f<v'v'V ft)\lv ~-::~ _,"'1 ~ ~ Ie.,:,! 11/08/02P. \ ~\ R;S l-~! Clay Terrac~ ~ \)\0 ,-;-.7 \'/-\" ~d IN2001-063~?> /::<~~/ "'{</TT~'".ll~)~v/ Date: Project Name: Project Number: To: Mr. Jon Dobosiewicc City of Carmel Planning Department Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: ~ Enclosed o Separately o Mail ~ As Requested via ~ Messenger o For Your Information o Overnight ~ For Your Review & Comment 0 0 Deliver by: Time: Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 2 sets Construction Plans 1 copy TAC Transmittals Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, pleaseJ contact our office. Thanks! Please return: 0 Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett :So f' U Q AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. , if Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Sbadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 //\\ <~ imfo@amercons.com /~-:' ~ ~-~-~---~(~~>, /,,)/, ~ /;-,. />/ lj; ~ '<<~~\ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL(~1! ~<v~~~\~\ 'f;\ \. ,:\, c.. !--, ,---< ~~ ('~ 1-' 11/08/02 v\ ~ <'\\)'V!-~1 \A.' , v fr' ':.'-.; \ ( ~-.-;j Clay Terrace\/>, /</ v /" ,,~. \, IN2001-0634 -....:. -_.<-<\\'J,'// .',:\ \......./ - - ----- Date: Project Name: Project Number: To: Gary Hoyt Office of Fire Chief Fire Station #1 Two Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: [8] Enclosed o Separately via o Mail [8] Messenger o Ovemight [8] As Requested o For Your Information [8] For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett - ,.;, f> u (;) AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. -.:. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: _ Mr. Ron Farrand Carmel/Clay Schools 5201 East 131 sl Street Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel. IN 46033 We are sending you: [gI Enclosed D Separately via D Mail [gI Messenger D Overnight [gI As Requested D For Your Information [gI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans . - Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions. please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ... ~ u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. J<: Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: MichaelFogarty Office of Police Chief Three Civic Square Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed o Separately via o Mail IZI Messenger o Overnight IZI As Requested o For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans .. Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: 0 Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett . ,.,.i. ., u w AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. ;; Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 . FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Jeff Kendall Deputy Building Commissioner One Civic Square Date: Project Name: Projec~ Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed D Separately via D Mail IZI Messenger D Overnight IZI As Requested D For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ;(. u 0 AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. .; Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Mike McBride City Engineer/ Department of Engineering One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 We are C8J Enclosed D Mail C8J As Requested sending you: o Separately via C8J Messenger o For Your Information Deliver by: o Ovemight C8J For Your Review & Comment Time: 0 0 Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett J..l .. u 0 AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. 'J :-; ~ . Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Dick Hill City Engineer/ Department of Engineering One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 We are sending you: [gJ Enclosed o Separately via o Mail [gJ Messenger o Overnight [gJ As Requested o For Your Information [gJ For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: OTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .- i~ u w AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. 1 ~ '"' Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Mr. John Duffy Carmel City Utilities 130 First Avenue SW Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are [gI Enclosed D Mail [gI As Requested sending you: D Separately via [gI Messenger D For Your Information Deliver by: D Overnight [gI For Your Review & Comment Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .. ., u "i" U , AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Todd Snyder Carmel City Parks Dept. 1055 Third Avenue SW Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: ~ Enclosed o Separately via o Mail ~ Messenger o Overnight ~ As Requested o For Your Information ~ For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans - Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .. .> u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. . ..~ .... ; Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547.5580 FAX: (317) 543.0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Scott Brewer Dept. of Community Services One Civic Square Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: [8J Enclosed D Separately D Mail [8J As Req~ested D For Your Information [8J For Your Review & Comment via [8J Messenger Deliver by: D Ovemight Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .. ., u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. J ,3 i( i Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Dean Groves Cinergy 1441 South Guilford Road Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: r8J Enclosed D Separately via D Mail r8J Messenger D Overnight r8J As Requested D For Your Information r8J For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett r. i' u w AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. ) ..~ .. j Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Tom Skolak Carmel Postmaster United States Postal Service 275 Medical Drive Carmel, IN 46032 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 We are sending you: [gI Enclosed o Separately o Mail [gI As Requested via [gI Messenger 0 For Your Information o Overnight [gI For Your Review & Comment 0 0 Deliver by: Time: Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ... ,< u w AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. j .' .. j Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Bill Akers Carmel/Clay Communications 31 First Avenue NW Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Carmel, IN 46032 We are sending you: IZI Enclosed o Separately via o Mail IZI Messenger o Overnight IZI As Requested o For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please retum: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .J. '.J>' W- .' AMERICAN u CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Hamilton County Surveyor's Office One Hamilton County Square Suite 146 Noblesville, IN 46060 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 To: We are sending you: [8] Enclosed o Separately via o Mail [8] Messenger o Overnight [8] As Requested o For Your Information [8] For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ./ AMERICA~ CONSUL T1NG, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Date: Project Name: Project Number: Hamilton County Health Department One Hamilton County Square Suite 30 Noblesville, IN 46060 We are sending you: ~ Enclosed D Separately D Mail ~ Messenger via D Overnight Deliver by: Time: D Date: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 ~ As Requested D For Your Information ~ For Your Review & Comment D QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. By: Michael B. Jett .l AMERICA~ CONSUL T1NG, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Chuck Shupperd Vectren P.O. Box 1700 Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Noblesville, IN 46061-1700 We are IZI Enclosed sending you: D Separately via D Mail IZI Messenger D Overnight IZI As Requested D For Your Information IZI For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ./ AMERICA~ w ~, CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Ron Booher Cinergy/PSI 100 Mill Creek Road Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Noblesville, IN 46060 We are [8J Enclosed D Mail [8J As Requested sending you: D Separately via [8J Messenger D For Your Information Deliver by: D Overnight [8J For Your Review & Comment Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ~ u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, IN~. .:,. .,~;.. , ,- Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: John South Hamilton County Soil and Water Conserv 11 08 South 9th Street Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Noblesville, IN 46060 We are sending you: [8J Enclosed o Separately via o Mail [8J Messenger o Overnight [8J As Requested o For Your Information [8J For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: o o Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions. please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett ~ u (,) AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. .-".' l'.. ," " Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL To: Steve Broermann Hamilton County Highway 1700 South 1 Olh Street Date: Project Name: Project Number: 11/08/02 Clay Terrace IN2001-0634 Noblesville, IN 46060 We are sending you: I:2J Enclosed D Separately via o Mail I:2J Messenger D Overnight I:2J As Requested D For Your Information I:2J For Your Review & Comment Deliver by: Time: D D Date: QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Construction Plans Remarks: The attached plans are being submitted for your review. If you have any questions, please contact our office. Thanks! Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x X X File Mr. Laurence Lillig Jr. By: Michael B. Jett .... .~.. U A. LAUTH PROPERTY ;'~" GROUP · .. ~, , '\ o . November 4, 2002 ~ n ,:~ \ \;t.\\\t.v ": ::=\ Mr J C D b . . ~~ ~ l)~\)1. ; I . ~n . o. ~SI:\WICZ ~ \) (.\ } :~! P~anmng AdmmIs\t~~tor \\,\S \)\J\;S ,f,) CIty of Carmel \S\" /<"/ O C"S '/'. /.,,1 ne IVIC quare ".<'~7;,-, ,/\{"y Carmel, IN 46032 '<!ln~L\,>:~ Re: Clay Terrace Retail Development (PUD Ordinance No. Z-386-02) Preliminary Site Plan Approval Plan review comment letters dated Octoher 15 & 16.2002. Mr. Dobosiewicz, Below are correlated itemized responses to the review comments as stated above. A. Response to review comment letter dated October 15, 2002 are as follows: 11. Drainage calculations will be provided to the City of Carmel. 12. The storm sewer system outside of the Right-of-Way will be private. 13. Sheet C2.0: . It is understood that the frontage road vacation will require the approval of the Carmel City Counsel. . There is a traffic signal planned between the two round a bouts. . Lane configurations will be indicated and arrows added to make clearer. . Pavements will be marked at all pedestrian crossings. 14. Sheet C3.1 . Sidewalks are planned outside of the Right-of-Way. . All infrastructures have been moved outside of Shell's pipeline easement (Note: Revised site plan will reflect this change). . The confIguration of the intersections as identified in your letter, win be changed to make for a better traffic flow. . Parking arrangement will be modified and will be reflected in the revised drawing. 15. Sheet C3.2 . The eastern portion of Rangeline Road will be incorporated into the traffic plans being developed for the county for Rangeline Road. . The normal pool elevation of the detention pond will be verified and compared to the water table as the drainage calculations are finalized. . Walter Street does not pass through to the west. 16. Parking lot has been rearranged to create smoother flow and identification, which will be reflected in the revised drawing to be submitted on 11-08-02. 9777 N. College Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46280 ph 317.848.6500 fx 317.848.6511 WMV.lauthpropero/.com Building Real Estate Solutions"" Since 1977 ... ,p ... . w o B. Response to review comment letter dated October 16,2002 are as follows: 1. The plans for improvements to Rangeline Road south of US 31 will be on the plans developed by the county for the Rangeline Road Project. 2. The plat vacation of Walter's addition will be submitted upon closing. 3. The revised site plan will reflect 75' Right-of-Way for the 146th Street. 4. We will submit plans to the state (INDOT) for review and comment. We anticipate their review to be focused on issues surrounding vacation of the frontage road along US31. 5. Right-of-Way and building setback lines will be shown on the revised plan. 6. The building at the SE comer of 146th street and Rangeline Road will be relocated to meet 45' setback requirements. This will be reflected on the revised site plan. 7. Landscaping wiIl be placed in the islands within the "Shell Pipeline Easement", This wiIl be reflected in the Landscape drawing, which will be submitted during ADLS. 8. 10' strip of landscaping will be provided along 146th Street. 9. 10' asphalt path will be provided from Rangeline and 146th to Rangeline and US31 running along east perimeter of the site. The revised site drawing will include this requirement. 10. Parking lot layout has been revised to reflect your comment. 11. All Right-of-Way lines will be depicted on the revised plan. 12. Proposed signs on North Rangeline Road & US 31 will be relocated until such time as the Patel parcel is re-zoned and included within the project real estate. 13. A 50' landscape easement for a tree preservation area is shown along the west property line. This does not extend along south property line and are not a requirement of the Carmel's Urban Forester. Over more, Hamilton County's engineer is requiring that the Rangeline Road's turning radius remains as indicated on our current site drawing. 14. An 8' fence is shown along the west and south property lines. 4.5' is given between the 50' Tree Preservation Easement and 50' Shell Pipeline Easement for the construction of the fence. As the design documents progress forward, we anticipate all of the concerns and comments by the City of Carmel will be responded. If you have any additional comments, please feel free to call me at 575-3088. Sincerely, ~~~ W.H. 'Mark' Jang Senior Project Manager CC: File David George - ACE Robert Rydell Joe Downs Pat Shea Gary Shelton Q A. LAUTH u ,..,. ""'th ANNIVERSARY -' ....., d~~ r~~-~--:z( , /~. ~ ~ f3 ECrJ\lEU .~ \~) G~1 ~~ 1~~2 )~ l UOCS ~ ~-U:;Y October 30, 2002 Mr. Jon C. Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator City of Cannel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 puP (l-jt./ / f) ~ Re: Clay Terrace Retail Development (pun Ordinance No. Z-386-02) Preliminary Site Plan Approval Request to be on T AC agenda on November 20, 2002. Mr. Dobosiewicz, Per our conversation on October 24, 2002, please let this letter serve as a request to be on your docket for the next T AC meeting on November 20, 2002. As discussed, we will be issuing a written response to your letters dated October 15 & 16,2002 and the meeting minutes issued for the October 16,2002 TAC meeting by November 5,2002. Over more, we will be submitting revised site plan by November 8, 2002 (Hand delivered) and we are scheduled to discuss this plan on November 14,20022:00 PM at your office. Sincerely, ~ W.H. 'Mark' Jang Senior Project Manager CC: File David George - ACE Joe Downs Pat Shea Gary Shelton OCT 24 '02 10:51AM P.U1 Suite 188 Olle J{r1l11tlro/l COII"I)! S'l/IQrf .}{obleslIille. Ilta/rln/1 ~b~~NH1"~(' October 24. 2002 American Consultlns. Inc. Attn: left'Clayton 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256 VIA FACSIMILE: 317-543.0270 Re: Clay Terrace Dear Mr. Clayton: We have teViewed the preliminary construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's office on Oetober 4, 2002. We have the following comments: I. This project is within the city limits of Carmel and the outlet to this project is not into a county regulated drain. Therefore we refer all comments to the City of Cannel. Ensfneer's office. 2. Please provide our office with a copy of your final construction documents for our records. Should you have any questions please contact me at 776-8495. Thank you. Sill....ly. ~ ~~man Plan keviewer Cc: Cannel-Engineer Cannel-Community Development HamlltoD County Department of Soil Conservation Services Hamilton Coullty Highway Department u u City of Carmel Fire Department Headquarters 2 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL. INDIANA 46032 317/571-2600 Jeff Clayton American Consulting, Inc. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256 f ~~\ \ ~ RE: Clay Terrace LETTER OF APPROVAL The undersigned has reviewed the proposed plans for Clay Terrace and has approved the plans subject to the following: 1. What are the proposed heights of buildings and will any buildings have a basement? 2. We are requesting that Knox boxes be installed at strategic locations to be determined in the future, so as to provide for access in the event of an emergency. We would request the project have a mastered key system to provide emergency access to the buildings in the event of an emergency. 3. Is it known at this time if any of the buildings are being protected by an automatic fire sprinkler system? If so a meeting will need to be set up to discuss the location(s) of the fire department connection(s). We will also be requesting that an exterior access door to the riser room for emergency access. Also we will request the purchase of Knox fire department connection caps so as to protect the integrity of the connection. 4. 5. 6. Please respond to the above noted condition(s) in writing and submit to our office prior to the scheduled Technical Advisory Meeting for this project. Date: October 7,2002 By: Gary Hoyt, Fire Marshal Carmel Fire Department Fire Prevention Saves Lives and Property .,~~ u u ~. -, TAC OCTOBER 16,2002 Urban Forester Notes Carmel Clay Historical Society: There are no objections to the Use Variance, but no landscape plan has been submitted with the Development Plan. Comments will be made after a landscape plan has been submitted. Lakeside Park. Section One: The Landscape Plan for the Secondary Plat and Construction Plans does not meet the Open Space Plan, Landscape Plan, Buffering requirements, and Tree Preservation Plan commitments submitted for the approved Primary Plat received by this office on August 29, and September 10, 2002. The Secondary Plat plans and Construction plans must meet, or equal these approved plans. Sheet 6 shows the installation of a storm sewer between yard inlet 159 and yard inlet 160. This sewer installation bisects a tree preservation area (Common area #1). The installation by trenching through this tree preservation area is not acceptable. Sewer installation through tree preservation areas must be accomplished by tunneling to sufficient depth not to injure trees in the woodlands; otherwise, drainage should be accomplished by grading, earthwork, or trenching outside the tree preservation areas. These woodland preservation areas are primary natural openspace conservation areas. Lakes at Hayden Run. Section Two: Four "street trees" shown along Lorenzo Boulevard on the Primary Plat are missing from the Secondary Plat landscape plan for Section Two. These need to be replaced. The developer's commitment to plant at least one large maturing shade tree near the street but outside the right-of-way in the front of each lot not on Lorenzo Boulevard (a county thoroughfare) must be included in Section Two as it was in Section One. The individual amounts for species are missing from the submitted landscape plans. These must be added to the plan. The Primary Plat Landscape plans show the woodland on the north perimeter being saved in its entirety. The Section Two plans show an encroachment into the woods by lots, a drainage easement, and a 6' asphalt path. Sheet 22 shows Tree Preservation Detail F (fencing), but there is no corresponding fencing on the Landscape Plan. This woodlands in its entirety is a primary conservation area on the open space plan for this subdivision as submitted to the Carmel Clay Plan Commission on October 21, 2001, and subsequently approved. This issue must be resolved before this plan can be approved. Fence row or native trees along the north-east perimeter should be preserved by utilizing tree protection measures as well. Villaae of West Clay. Helen Wells Buildina: The Villas at Sweet Charity Farms: Landscape plans must include planting notes and graphic planting details. Please also include a diagram detailing required bufferyard plantings and proposed plant numbers. Any additional shade trees committed to be planted in the front yards of lots must be near the street but outside the right-of-way. Please detail the species of the 102 shade trees committed for the 51 lots on the landscape plans. Additional plant materials for buffering should be added behind Lots 1-7 and along the path between Benevolence Court and Beaument Boulevard South to screen views into the PSI property. More should be added along the east perimeter south of Lot 27. It my suggestion that the open drainage on the south east corner be graded outside the existing strip of brush and woods. .., u u '/I , Laura Vista Subdivision: Due to the wildlife in this area, connectivity of the common areas should be a priority. The US Fish and Wildlife Service has acknowledged this riparian corridor (forested floodplain) as an ecologically sensitive area (possible habitat for the federally protected Indiana bat) that should not be disrupted. A written tree preservation plan needs to accompany the secondary plat including graphic details of the tree and all woodland protection measures. Wooded common areas need to be listed as tree preservation areas on the plat and in the neighborhood covenants. Requirements and allowed activities must be detailed for tree preservation areas within the neighborhood covenants. If a monument sign is proposed, a plan of the sign the required landscaping must be submitted. There has been no landscaping plan submitted at all. If one is not proposed, a written explanation must be provided. I will be glad to meet separately and on site if needed. Shade trees should be planted along the portion of the multi-use path from Laura Vista Drive west to the woods. (Path on plat?) Clay Terrace: There have been significant changes between the Rezone PUD plan and the Development plan currently submitted. The current plan does not include any landscaping, tree protection. or reforestation plans as required with the Rezone application. Comments will be made when those are submitted. The areas to plant the required landscaping and reforestation seem to have significantly lessened due to changes in storm water detention and change of layout. Motorcycles of Indiana: No change of use? Cherry Creek Estates: No submittal Providence at Old Meridian: Correct mistakes on plant schedule. No Austrian pine, no red maples, no cockspur thornless hawthorn, change Malus Coral Burst to recommended species. American Standard for Nursery Stock (1996) not ANSI. Significant changes to PUD development plan - doesn't match original plan (Mark Timmons) or installed (Rick Riddle). Label all plants individually and give #'s in schedule. Planting details - plant trees with root flare at grade level (not same as nursery), don't pile mulch up on trunk of tree. Remove large dead Oak at entrance and others that are risk trees. Donate large White Oak sections for community use. Plant evergreen screen on Arbors border as agreed when development plan approved. Areas of constructed soils? Clarian Hosoital North: Haven't had sufficient time to make a complete review. Construction causes a removal of a significant section of trees. No planting schedule, needs table of requirements vs. plan, NO Austrian Pines, NO Pin Oaks, replace Tilia cordata with Tilia tomentosa. Planting details - flare root at grade level. Why planting pits for containerized trees? Suggest constructed soils. Carmel Transoortation Facility: Correct mistakes on plant schedule. No Austrian pine, no red maples, no cockspur thornless hawthorn, change Malus Coral Burst to recommended species. Plan shows trees in pond. Plant trees on west side of lake along parking lot. Note: remove wires and stakes after one year. Label individual plants. Planting details - plant trees with root flare at grade level (not same as nursery), don't pile mulch up on trunk of tree. ~ -- ,,;. " City of Carmt!f1 COpy VIA FAX: 543-0270 October 16, 2002 Jeff Clayton American Consulting Inc. 7260 Shadel and Station Indianapolis, Indiana 46256 RE: Clay Terrace/Preliminary Construction Plans ..' , Dear Mr. Clayton: This letter is in response to your preliminary construction plan filing. The following comments need to be addressed and/or plans/applications updated accordingly. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. d7 ~ ~ @J tfi} B Provide plans for improvements to Rangeline Road south of US 31. The plat vacation of Walter's addition must be submitted. Minimum ROW for Rangeline Road is 90'; minimum ROW for 146th Street is 75' (65' shown on plans) File letter with plans to the State' (INDOT) for comments. Identify ROWand building setback lines. 20' building setback shown for building at the southeast comer of Rangeline Road and 146th Street, 45' is required. Landscaping is required on the islands within the area of the proposed pipeline ",easement. Laridscape strip: 5' shown; 10' required along 146th Street. Illustrate pathways along Rangeline Road north and south of US 31 and 146th Street. 10' asphalt paths required per Alternative Transportation Plan. Add additional islands in parking lots to break up long, continuous stretches or parking spaces. Define exact street ROW lines. Ensure 30' landscape buffer between ponds/parking ROW. Relocate proposed signs from intersection of Rangeline Road and US 31 onto project real estate. ,Minimum setback (tree preservation easement) from the west and south property lines is 50'. Revise in area adjacent to lots in Walter's addition. Show 8' fence location; 50' setback, 8' fence, and 10' from parking area. Page 1 ONE CIVIC SQUARE 317 /571-2417 CARMEL, INDL'\NA 46032 1 .. -- . The above comments are based on the Preliminary Construction Plans dated October 4, 2002. We would anticipate plans with greater detail in the future. Sincerely, ~~ Planning Administrator Clay Terrace- Prelim. Construction Plans Cc: Joe Downs Lauth Property Group 9777 N. College Ave. Indianapolis, Indiana 46280 Page 2 ONE CMC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 ~ Sponsor: Councilor Wilson --. ORDINANCE NO.Z-386-02 AS AMENDED AN ORDINANCE OF THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CARMEL, INDIANA ESTABLISHING THE U.S. mGHWAY 31 AND 146TH STREET PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT WHEREAS, Section 31.6.4 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance Z-289, (the "Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance") provides for the establishment of a Planned Unit Development District in accordance with the requirements on.c. ~ 36-7-4-1500 et seq.; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Common Council of the City of Carmel, Indiana, pursuant to I.C. ~ 36-7-4-1500 et seq., it adopts this ordinance, (the "Ordinance"), as an amendment to the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Section 1. Applicabilitv of Ordinance: Section 1.1. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Carmel and Clay Township, a part of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance, is hereby changed to designate the land described in Exhibit 'A', (the "Real Estate"), as a planned unit development district. Section 1.2. Development in the planned unit development district shall be governed entirely by the provisions of this Ordinance, with the exception that provisions of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance specifically referenced within this Ordinance shall also apply. Section 1.3. Any capitalized term not defined herein shall have the meaning as set forth in the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Section 2. Permitted Primary Uses: Clinic or medical health center Financial Institution Hardware Store (less than 50,000 square feet and not utilizing the warehouse format described in the excluded primary uses below) (including enclosed Lumberyard and attached Garden Center Multi le-Famil Dwellin Professional Office Hotel Indoor Movie Theater Restaurant (may include a walk-up or pick up window to ick u re-ordered items Colle e or Universi General Offices Specialty design and home-decor stores or centers (current examples being stores such as Expo, Great Indoors, Restoration Hardware. Pottery Barn and Smith & Hawken). theatrical Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 2 " , Outdoor temporary sales (up to 10 days) such Grocery Store as sidewalk: sales, art fairs and cultural events (may include sidewalk kiosks) Retail Uses. * Retail Uses shall include, but are not limited to, sales of merchandise. consumer goods and equipment; drug stores; pet shops; liquor stores; auto leasing offices; and indoor automobile showrooms and sales. Section 3. Excluded Primary Uses: Amusement Park Automobile service station or fillin station Bulk stora e of etroleum roducts Cami vals and circuses Disposal or storage of hazardous or radioactive materials Flea market Garba e dis osal landfill Grain elevator Junk and/or salva e Manufactured hous' Mobile home court Penal or correctional institution Water slide Refining or manufacturing asphalt, cement, sum, lime, wood reservatives Sand and vel extraction or sales Sexuall oriented business Small engine sales or repair Stock yards, slaughtering, leather curing and tannin Reclaiming processes involving materials and/or chemicals that are considered dangerous to the health, safety, and welfare of the general public as determined by the State of Indiana, Hamilton County or the City Outdoor automobile sales or leasin Boat sales Car wash Commercial warehouse stora e Industrial Equipment sales or repair manufacturing of petroleum Home improvement center having a building footprint of greater than 50,000 square feet. A store or center utilizing the large warehouse format for sale of lumber and building materials currently used by companies such as Lowes, Menards and Home Depot, but not including the specialty design or home-decor stores listed in the ermitted rim uses. ~ :; Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 3 Section 4. Accessory Buildings and Uses: All accessory buildings and uses which are permitted in the B-2 zoning district shall be pennitted, except that any detached accessory building shown in any Preliminary Development Plan ("PDP") shall have on all sides the same architectural features or shall be architecturally compatible with the principal building(s) with which it is associated. Section 5. Minimum Tract Size: The minimum tract size is 5 acres. This Section 5 does not however preclude the sale or other transfer of any parcel of land that is less than 5 acres within a tract after the approval of a PDP for the entire tract. However, the development of the parcel must still conform to the Final Development Plan ("FDP") for the entire tract as approved or amended by the Director, and all other applicable requirements contained in this Ordinance. Section 6. Height. Area and Architectural Reauirements: Section 6.1. Maximum Buildimz Heights: All uses: sixty-five (65) feet for buildings located east of Range Line Road; fifty-five (55) feet for buildings located west of Range Line Road and more than three hundred (300) feet from the west property line or a single family residential zoning district; and forty-five (45) feet for buildings located west of Range Line Road but less than three hundred (300) feet from the west property line or a single family residential zoning district. Section 6.2. Minimum Building Heismt: The minimum building height is eighteen (18) feet, with a minimum of sixteen (16) feet to the lowest eaves for a building with a gable or hip roof; excepting for standalone buildings not abutting Range Line Road, which shall have a minimum building height of twenty-five (25) feet. Accessory buildings and screened delivery areas are exempt from the requirements of this Section. In the ADLS approval process, building heights along Range Line Road will be reviewed to avoid long building facades at the same height. Section 6.3. Minimum Building Setbacks: The minimum buil~g setback shall be at least 90 feet from the current U.S. Highway 31 right-of-way. Along the right-of-way of 146th Street, the minimum building setback shall be 45 feet. Along any right-of-way of any future ramp on or off U.S. Highway 31, the minimum building setback shall be 25 feet. There shall be no minimum setback for those buildings oriented toward and adjacent to the Range Line Road right-of-way, but there shall be a maximum building setback of twenty-five (25) feet. Section 6.4. Minimum Gross Floor Area. Buildings East of Range Line Road and Range Line Road Develooment: A. All buildings, which are not connected to or an integral part of the Range Line Road streets cape development, shall have a minimum of fifteen thousand (15,000) square feet of gross floor area, excluding the floor area of any basement ~ Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th StreetPUD Ordinance Page 4 or any accessory building(s). Provided, however, that one standalone restaurant building is allowed and shall have a minimum of 7,500 square feet of gross floor area. Also, one standalone financial institution building is allowed and shall have a minimum of 2,500 square feet of gross floor area, excluding the floor area of any basement or any accessory building(s). B. Any building having a building footprint of greater than eighty thousand (80,000) square feet shall be located east of Range Line Road. Any tenant in a building located west of Range Line Road may however, occupy more than eighty thousand (80,000) square feet of gross floor area (For purposes of this Ordinance, the term "tenant" includes an owner/occupant of a building.) C. Accessory buildings permitted need not meet the minimum floor area requirement. D. The majority of the developed gross floor area (excluding the gross floor area of any building with a single tenant having a building footprint greater than 50,000 square feet) shall abut the right-of-way of Range Line Road. Section 6.5. Architectural Design Requirements: A. Suitability of building materials: A minimum of three materials shall be used for building exteriors, from the following list: stone, architectural masonry, architectural pre-cast (panels or detailing), architectural metal panels, glass, ElF'S or ornamental metal. B. All buildings shall be designed in order to eliminate monotonous box buildings. C. Sloped roofs shall be a maximum of one hundred fifty (150) feet without a change in roof plane, or gable or dormer. Sloped roofs shall be either standing seam metal or dimensional shingles. D., The building facades shall consist of three elements: a base or foundation; middle or modulated wall; and a top formed by an articulated cornice. E. Fixed or retractable awnings are permitted. F. Facades constructed of more than one material shall only change material along a horizontal line (not a vertical line, except in the case of an offset described in subparagraph G below or a diagonal line). G. Continuous facades of more than 200 feet wide shall be designed with vertical offsets at intervals which divide the facade. Offsets may be projecting, recessed or may be a simple change in building material or detailing. ; Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th StreetPUD Ordinance Page 5 H. All window design shall be compatible with the style, materials, architectural detail and proportion of the building. I. No sign may extend above the cornice line of the building. J. Individual tenants in multi-tenant ground floor or multi-tenant multi-level buildings should strive for a unique design and graphic image and style, rather than be required to conform to a single design and graphic image and style for the building. K. Exterior lighting on the front building fayade shall be architecturally integrated with the building style and materials. Rooftop lighting shall be prohibited, but ground mounted lighting is highly encouraged. L. Individual storefronts shall incorporate architectural elements such as lintels, pediments, pilasters, columns and other design elements appropriate to the architectural style of the building as a whole. M. Buildings which are connected to or an integral part of the Range Line Road streetscape development shall be at least one and one half (1 Yz) stories, or be designed to appear so from the front and sides. Retail buildings are encouraged to be two stories in height, with office use or retail use on the second floor. Section 6.6. Sincle Tenant Buildings: Any single tenant building with a building footprint greater than eighty thousand (80,000) square feet shall be located east of Range Line Road. Section 7. Landscaoing Reauirements. Section 7.1. Landscaoine: Plan: A landscaping plan shall be submitted to the Commission for its approval at the same time the information on architectural design, landscaping, parking, signage, and lighting, ("ADLS") is submitted. This plan shall: 1. be drawn to scale, including dimensions and distances; 2. delineate all existing and proposed structures, private parking areas, walks, ramps for handicapped, terraces, drive-ways, signs, lighting standards, steps and other similar structures; and 3. delineate the location, size and description of all landscape material and the irrigation system for all planting areas. Landscape treatment for plazas, roads, paths, service and private parking areas shall be designed as an integral and coordinated part of the landscape plan for the entire tract. Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 6 Section 7.2. Areas to be Landscaped. A. Greenbelt: 1. The greenbelt along U.S. Highway 31 shall be a minimum of thirty (30) feet in width and landscaped per the requirements of Section 7.3. 2. Greenbelt areas shall be unoccupied except for plant material, steps, walks, terraces, bike paths, driveways, lighting standards, signs, and other similar structures (excluding a private parking area). B. Parallel Roadwavs: 1. There shall be landscaEe planting areas located adj acent to the south right-of-way line of 146 Street west of Range Line Road and the U.S. Highway 31 on and off ramps (if constructed), which shall be a minimum often (10) feet in width and landscaped pursuant to Section 7.3. 2. These landscape areas shall be unoccupied except for plant material, steps, walks, terraces, bike paths, driveways, lighting standards, signs, and other similar structures. 3. Landscaping along Range Line Road shall be located within the right-of-way as per the agreement of the Director, the Hamilton County Highway Department and the owner of that portion of the Real Estate adjacent to the right-of-way of Range Line Road. C. Planting Within Parking Lots: Landscaping within the planting islands, planting peninsulas and entranceways (other than those along Range Line Road) of the parking areas shall be of a quality to improve and enhance the site and its surrounding area, representing no less than six percent (6%) of the total surface parking area. (For purposes of this computation, landscaping in the greenbelt(s), landscaping along the front and sides of the building(s) and landscaping on the periphery of the tract shall not be included.) Landscaping within parking lots shall be landscaped pursuant to the standards set forth in Section 7.3. The minimum size of a parking lot island shall be four hundred (400) square feet in area. D. Tree Preservation Areas: An area fifty (50) feet in width shall be maintained in its natural state on the western property boundary and on the south property boundary (west of Range Line Road) of the Real Estate except for normal pruning, removal and replacement of dead trees. A fence at least eight (8) feet in height shall be erected and maintained approximately fifty feet from the western boundary and the southern boundary (west of Range Line Road) of the Real Estate. E. Plantine Adjacent to Standalone Buildines: 1. A planting area equal to an area measuring ten (10) feet in depth by the width of the front of a standalone building plus twenty (20) feet (to I " Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 7 extend ten (10) feet out on both sides) shall be installed at the front of a standalone building. 2. A planting area equal to an area five (5) feet in depth shall be installed on the sides of a standalone building but is not required on the rear of the building. 3. Sidewalks up to eight (8) feet in width are permitted in these areas, but shall not occupy the entire area on any side of a standalone building (excepting for those areas adjacent to access points to a standalone building). 4. These adjacent planting areas need not be rectangular in shape as long as the required amount of space is landscaped, innovative and original designs are encouraged. F. Planting Adiacent to Multi-Tenant Buildings: 1. A planting area equal to an area three (3) feet in depth shall be installed on the sides of a multi-tenant building but is not required on the rear of the building nor along any side adjacent to a pedestrian walkway (not a street, drive or other vehicle access way). 2. Sidewalks are pennitted in these areas, but shall not occupy the entire area on any side ofa multi-tenant building (excepting for those areas adjacent to access points to a multi-tenant building). 3. These adjacent planting areas need not be rectangular in shape as long as the required amount of space is landscaped, innovative and original designs are encouraged. Section 7.3. Landscaoim1: Standards. A. Interior Areas: The dimensions, specifications and design of any planting area or planting median shall be sufficient to protect the landscaping materials planted therein and to provide for proper growth. The following minimum widths for interior planting areas shall be used: Canopy Trees; 9 feet wide Ornamental Trees: 7 feet wide Shrubs (only): 5 feet wide B. Greenbelt and Parallel Roadwavs: The primary landscaping materials used in the greenbelt areas, along parallel roadways except Range Line Road shall be shade trees, ornamental trees, shrubs, ground covers, grasses, and flowers. A base planting unit of one hundred (100) linear feet will be designated for the U.S. Highway 31 greenbelt and along parallel roadways which includes: 1. Five (5) shade trees; 2. Three (3) ornamental trees or three (3) evergreen trees; and 3. Fifteen (15) shrubs Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 8 Plantings within greenbelt and along the parallel roadways may be grouped together to provide visual perspectives of the buildings and address public safety concerns. Due to the grade elevation change along 146th Street east of Range Line Road~ landscaping will not be required adjacent to the right-of-way of eastbound 146th Street east of Range Line Road where the grade change reasonably precludes landscaping. C. Parking Lot Landscaping. Landscaping within the planting islands, planting peninsulas and entranceways of the parking areas shall contain not less than two (2) trees and ten (10) shrubs for each four hundred (400) square feet of interior landscaped area, but shall not include any ornamental trees. D. Materials: All plants proposed to be used in accordance with any landscaping plan shall meet the following specifications: 1. Shade trees: a minimum trunk diameter of 2 Y2 inches at six (6) inches above the ground line~ a minimum height of eight (8) feet, and a branching height of not less than 1/3 nor more than 1/2 of tree height. 2. Ornamental trees: a minimum trunk diameter of 1 ~ inches at six (6) inches above the ground line, a minimum height of six (6) feet, and a branching height of not less than 1/3 nor more than 1/2 of tree height. 3. Evergreen trees: a minimum height of eight (8) feet~ a width of not less than 3/5 of the height. 4. Deciduous shrubs: minimum height of twenty-four (24) inches~ with no less than six (6) main branches upon planting. 5. Evergreen shrubs: minimum height and spread of twenty-four (24) inches. Section 7.4. Landscaoing Installation and Maintenance. A. Installation: All required landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of a final Certificate of Occupancy by the Department. If it is not possible to install the required landscaping because of weather conditions, the property owner shall post a bond for an amount equal to the total cost of the required landscaping that has yet to be installed and/or completed prior to the issuance of the temporary Certificate of Occupancy. B. Maintenance: It shall be the responsibility of the owners and their agents to insure proper maintenance of project landscaping and retention ponds approved in accordance with the development requirements specified for this Ordinance. This is to include~ but is not limited to~ irrigation and mulching of planting areas, replacing dead~ diseased, or overgrown plantings with identical varieties or a suitable substitute~ and keeping the area free of refuse, debris, rank vegetation and weeds. Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 9 C. Chanl!es After ADDroval: No landscaping which has been approved by the Conunission may later be materially altered, eliminated or sacrificed, without first obtaining further Commission approval. However. minor alterations in landscaping may be approved by the Director in order to conform to specific site conditions. D. Insoection: The Director shall have the authority to visit the Real Estate to inspect the landscaping and check it against the approved plan on file. Section 8. Parking Requirements: A. Parking is prohibited in the u.s. Highway 31 Greenbelt and within planting areas along parallel roadways. 1. The number of parking spaces required shall be according to Section 27.5 of the Cannel/Clay Zoning Ordinance; however. for the purposes of calculating the required number of parking spaces, retail and grocery store uses shall use a parking ratio of one (1) parking space for every two hundred fifty (250) of gross floor area and the area of screened delivery areas shall be excluded. Upon the review and approval by the Director, parking spaces on the Real Estate may be shared among tenants as long as the demand for the spaces does not coincide among tenants. 2. There shall be an appropriate number of parking spaces, accessible to the building(s) and identified as reserved for use by handicapped individuals, and these spaces shall meet State of Indiana requirements. 3. Above-grade, structured parking facilities shall have on all sides architectural features that are compatible with the principal building(s) with which they are associated. Section 9. Lightin2 ReQuirements: A. A site lighting plan shall be submitted along with the information on ADLS. The site lighting plan shall include the layout, spread and intensity of all site lighting. including: 1. parking lot and service/storage area lighting; 2. architectural, display lighting; 3. security lighting; 4. lighting of pedestrian and bicycle ways; 5. landscape lighting. B. The maximum height of light standards shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet. However. when light standards abut or fall within ninety (90) feet of a residential district or use, they shall not exceed fifteen (15) feet. Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 10 C. All site pole lights and wall mounted lights shall be low-level, 900 cutoff luminaires and shall not spill over into adjoining properties in excess of 0.3 footcandle in commercial areas, and 0.1 footcandle in residential areas. D. Exterior architectural, display, decorative and sign lighting visible to the public from U.S. Highway 31 is allowed. Section 10. Other ADLS Requirements. Section 10.1. Outside Storage of Refuse or Merchandise: No outside, unenclosed storage of refuse (whether or not in containers) or merchandise shall be permitted on any tract. All refuse shall be contained completely within the principal or accessory building(s). Any accessory structure designed for refuse storage shall be architecturally compatible with the principal building. Section 10.2. Loading Berths: Any loading or unloading berth or bay visible from U.S. Highway 31 shall be screened subject to the approval of the Commission or Committee of the Commission. Section 10.3. Sign Reauirements: A. Sign Plan: A sign plan shall be submitted for the Commission's approval as part of an ADLS or ADLS amendment application. B. Sign Standards: The signs within the Planned Unit Development District shall conform to the following standards, unless specified otherwise in this Ordinance: 1. 2. The color of the signs shall not be restricted; however, each building shall have a palette of colors approved at the time of the ADLS approval for the building. Tenants may amend the colors by petition to and upon the approval of a Committee of the Commission pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Procedure. Window signage shall be allowed for all tenants and shall conform to the standards established for window signs under Ordinance Z- 302. In the event that a building has been previously approved by the Commission under the ADLS approval process a tenant may seek the approval of its window signage through an amendment to the previously approved ADLS application to be approved by a Committee of the Commission. Banners shall be allowed as provided for in Ordinance Z-302. Provided, that banners may be installed on lighting and other fixtures located within the streetscape along Range Line Road in accordance with the review and approval of the proposed banners by a Committee of the Commission pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Procedure. 3. Ordinance Z-386"()2 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 11 C. Center Identification Ground Si2l1s: 1. Two (2) Center Identification Ground Signs each with a maximum height of 6 feet and a maximum sign area 0 uare feet shall be allowed at: (a) the south entrance to th development orth of the intersection of Range Line Road with U.S. . way 31; and (b) at the intersection of Range Line Road and 146th Street. These Center Identification Ground Signs may not include tenant identification and shall be consistent in design with the sign shown in Exhibit "B". 2. One (I) Center Identification Ground Sign with a maximum height of 7 feet and a maximum sign area of 360 square feet shall be allowed in the area adjacent to the greenbelt along U.S. Highway 31. This Center Identification Ground Sign may not include tenant identification and shall be consistent in design with the sign shown in Exhibit "B". 3. Two (2) Center/tenant identification ground signs with a maximum height of 5 feet and a maximum sign area of 35 square feet shall be allowed at each intersection of a private drive or public street and Range Line Road. Copy on these Center/tenant identification ground signs may include tenant names up to seventy (70) percent of the maximum sign area and if tenant identification is included, at least two but no more than six tenants may be identified. D. Wall Shms: Consistent with the sign standards set forth in subparagraph B. above, wall signs shall be permitted for each tenant. Excepting for any standalone single or multi-tenant building adjacent to the greenbelt along U.S. Highway 31, the Maximum Sign Area shall be determined in accordance with the non-freeway sign chart applicable for tenants in Single Tenant & Multi-Tenant Buildings (Ground Floor & Multi-Level) as set forth in Ordinance Z-302. However, for purposes of this Ordinance, any building located adjacent to the right-of-way of Range Line Road that is located less than five (5) feet from the right-of-way line of Range Line Road shall be deemed to be located five (5) feet from the right-of-way line for purposes of applying the sign chart referenced above to determine the allowable sign area for the wall signage. Wall signs shall be composed of individual letters and logos and may be illuminated by internal or external sources. Tenants in buildings with more than one frontage on a public street or private drive are allowed one wall identification sign per frontage on a public street or private drive, as long as the total number of wall signs does not exceed three (3). Standalone single or multi-tenant building adjacent to the greenbelt along U.S. Highway 31 shall be permitted wall signs facing or oriented toward U.S. Highway 31 in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance Z-302. Provided, however that: Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 12 1. there shall be no wall signs on the east facade of any multi-tenant or single tenant buildings located east of the right-of-way of Range Line Road; and 2. there shall be no wall signs on the west facade facing a single family residential zoning district of any multi-tenant or single tenant buildings located along or west of the west right-of-way of Range Line Road. E. Awnin2 Sifms: Signs may be imprinted on permanent awnings. These signs shall be secondary to the wall signage of any tenant and the sign area shall be subject to the approval of the Commission or a Committee of the Commission as a part of the ADLS or ADLS amendment approval process and pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Procedure. F. Single Tenant Building Sifms. Single tenant building signage shall be as permitted by Ordinance Number Z-302, and as amended by Subparagraphs B and D above Section 10.4. Rooftop Mechanical Equipment: Any rooftop mechanical equipment visible from an adjoining street or highway shall be screened with suitable walls or fencing subject to the approval procedures contained in the Commission's Rules of Procedure. Section 10.5. Cart Corrals: Any cart corrals on the Real Estate shall be constructed of masonry materials subject to the approval procedures contained in the Commission's Rules of Procedure. Section 11. Approval of ADLS: A. The Commission shall consider an ADLS approval application for any project on the Real Estate. B. The Commission shall approve the ADLS without conditions, or approve with conditions. C. Pursuant to Paragraph A above, multi-tenant buildings shall be submitted to the Commission for ADLS approval. At that time, palettes of building materials, lighting fixtures, signage types and designs, awnings and window treatments for the tenant facades may be submitted for approval concurrently with the approval of the ADLS application for the multi-tenant building. Thereafter, tenant facades (including, but not limited to, building materials, signage, awnings and window treatments) may be submitted to the Department for approval. To the extent that there is Material Alteration from the approved items within a particular palette, then the request shall be reviewed and approved by a Committee of the Commission, pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Procedure. Ordinance 2-386-02 U.s. Highway31 and 146th StreetPUD Ordinance Page 13 D. If there is a Material Alteration in the ADLS plans, review and approval shall be made by a Committee of the Commission, pursuant to the Commission's Rules of Procedure. E. The ADLS shall be a specific plan consisting of the architectural design of any buildings, landscaping, lighting, and signage for a site on the Real Estate. Section 12. Approval or Denial of the Preliminary and Final Development Plans: A. The Commission shall approve without conditions, approve with conditions, or disapprove the Preliminary Development Plan ("PDP") for any project on the Real Estate. Provided, however, that the Commission shall not unreasonably withhold or delay the approval of a PDP that is in conformance with this Ordinance and the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. If the Commission disapproves the PDP for any project on the Real Estate, the Commission shall set forth in writing the basis for the disapproval. B. The Director shall approve without conditions, approve with conditions, or disapprove the Final Development Plan ("FDP") for any project on the Real Estate. Provided, however, that the Director shall not unreasonably withhold or delay the approval of a FDP that is in conformance with this Ordinance and the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. If the Director disapproves the FOP for any proj ect on the Real Estate, the Director shall set forth in writing the basis for the disapproval. C. An amendment to a PDP or FDP which does not alter the use of any land may be reviewed and approved by the Director. However, any interested party may appeal the decision of the Director directly to a committee of the Commission. D. The PDP shall be a preliminary plan for the development of real property that is submitted for approval by the Commission showing proposed facilities and structures and parking information for a site on the Real Estate. E. The FOP shall be a specific plan for the development of real property that is submitted for approval by the Director showing proposed facilities and structures, parking, drainage, erosion control, utilities and building information for a site on the Real Estate. F. No Final Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any building until Range Line Road has been constructed between l46th Street and U.S. Highway 31, west of U.S. Highway 31. G. Improvements to Range Line Road south of the intersection of Range Line Road and U.S. Highway 31 shall be completed in accordance with plans approved Ordinance Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 14 by the Department within 6 months following the completion of construction of Range Line Road between 146th Street and U.S. Highway 31. Section 13. Tree Preservation in Future Ramo Area: No fewer than 140 inches of trees will be preserved on that portion of the Real Estate designated as Area "C." Area "C" is situated on the projectts eastern boundary, facing U.S. 31, and comprises approximately 4.75 acres as outlined and defined in the tree preservation and reforestation plan approved by the Carmel Department of Community Services' Urban Forestert Mr. Scott Brewer. This commitment to preserve these trees is in lieu of the establishment of a 50 foot buffer area along U.S.31. The owner of the Real Estate reserves the right to remove any dead or diseased tree, or any tree that constitutes a threat to the public health, safety welfare; however, the owner shall replace any removed tree and maintain the minimum. 140-inch requirement. This commitment will terminate in the event that the Indiana Department of Transportation, Hamilton County or any other governmental unit acquires Area "e" for the installation of ramps related to the expansion of U.S. 31. However, consistent with the approved tree preservation and reforestation plan, the 140 inches of trees will be replaced through new plantings elsewhere on the site. Section 14. Commencement of Construction: If at the end of twenty-four (24) months following the date of adoption of this Ordinance by the Common Council of the City of Carmel (the "Council")t construction has not commenced on the Real Estate consistent with the provisions of this Ordinancet then Lauth Property Group, its successors or assignst as developert (the "Developer"), shall, upon notice, appear before the Council to update the members of the Council as to the status of the commencement of construction. At that time, Developer may request one (1) additional yeart to commence construction. At the meeting, the Council shall be free to: (1) allow this Ordinance to remain in full force and effect; (2) allow this Ordinance to remain in full force and effect for one (1) additional year; or (3) repeal this Ordinance. Section 15. Violations of Ordinance: All violations of this Ordinance shall be subj ect to Section 34.0 of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance. Section 16. All prior Ordinances or parts thereof inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed. Section 17. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and signing by the Mayor. Ordinance 2-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th Street PUD Ordinance Page 15 ~ PASSED by the Common c01 of the City of Carm.~ Indiana this 3",dday of ~ IJk rt .AI r: 2002, by a vote of ayes and -4 nays. COMMON COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF CARMEL ~ ~/U~-~L ~ding Officer QpfYJi,d Kevin Kirby wa9~~~tPro Tempore ~/Q~ N.L. Rundle ~~_f~ /;f1~ Robert Battreall r-; /. ~~I/!~~ ; ?l {)tL4J.dhlu.t1-Lfud Luci Snyder / ATTEST: Presentej b.YA me to the Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana this ~ ,2002, at ltJ,~()M. Ordinance Z-386"()2 U.S. Highway 31 and 146th StreetPUD Ordinance Page 16 3 day of JeD Approved by me, Mayor of the City of Carmel, Indiana, this ~ day of ~, 2002, at I 0 ~ ( .fM. ATTEST: Prepared by: Paul G. Reis. Esq. Attorney-at-Law Drewry Simmons Pitts & V omehm, LLP 8888 Keystone Crossing, Suite 1200 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240 PUD Ordinance 8-22-02(City Council_1 ).doc k6~J J aines Brainard, Mayor Exhibit 'A' Legal Descriptions Parcels #1 and #2 W&D Land Company, LLC Parcel 1 (Instr. #2000-47987) Part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East in Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Beginning on the North line of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East 810.48 feet South 88 degrees 47 rp.inutes 30 seconds West (assumed bearing) from the Northeast comer ofsaid Northeast Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds East parallel with the East line of said Northeast Quarter 310.00 feet; thence North 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East parallel with said North line 170.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds East parallel with the said East line 369.8 feet to the North line of real estate described in a conveyance by Warranty Deed Record 168, page 378 in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana; thence South 88 degrees 51 minutes 20 seconds West parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter 665.09 feet to the West line of said East half; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West on said West line 323.30 feet to a point 355.55 feet South of the Northwest comer of said East Half; thence North 88 degrees 46 minutes 42 seconds East 206.95 feet; thence North 00 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds East 355.68 feet to a point on the North line of said Northeast Quarter 1092.21 feet West of the Northeast corner thereof; thence North 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East on said North line 123.73 feet to the Northwest corner of real estate described in a conveyance by Warranty Deed recorded in Deed Record 209, page 211 in said Recorder's Office, being 948.48 feet West of said Northeast comer; thence South 00 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds East on the West line of said real estate 350.00 feet to the Southwest comer thereof; thence North 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East on the South line of said real estate parallel with said North line 125.00 feet to the Southeast comer of said real estate; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 30 seconds West on the East line of said real estate 350.00 feet to the North line of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East on said North line 33.00 feet to the place of beginning. Parcel 2 (Inst. #2000-47988) Part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, located in Hamilton County, Indiana, being more particularly described as follows: Begirming 843.48 feet West of the Northeast comer of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East; thence West on and along the North line of said Quarter Section 125 feet to a point; thence South on a forward deflection angle of 89 degrees 00 minute left 350 feet to a point; thence East and parallel to the North line of said quarter section 125 feet to a point; thence North 350 to the place of beginning. Parcel #3 Liebtag A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, described as follows: Beginning at a point 680.0 feet South of the Northeast corner of the East Half of Section 24, Township 18 N, R 3 E; thence South on and along the East line of said East Half 680.3 feet to a point; thence West 1305.42 feet to the West line of said East Half; thence North 680.3 feet to an iron stake; thence said point being 679.5 feet South, ofthe Northwest comer of the said East Half; thence East 1305.71 feet to the place of beginning. ALSO: A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast comer of the Northeast Quarter, of Section 24, Township 18 N, R 3 E; thence South along the East line of said Quarter section 680.00 feet to a point; thence West parallel with the North line of said Quarter section 639.71 feet to an iron stake, said point being 666.0 feet East of the West line of said East Half; thence North Parallel with the West line of the East Half 680.0 feet to the intersection with the North line of said Quarter section; thence East on and along said North line 640.0 feet to the place of beginning. EXCEPT: (RIGHT OF WAY) A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana described as follows: Commencing at the northeast comer of said section; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West (assumed bearing) 195.218 meters (640.48 feet) along the north line of said section to the prolonged west line of the owner's land; thence South 0 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds East 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) along said prolonged west line to the point of beginning of the description, which point is on the south boundary of 146th Street ;thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds East 134.360 meters (440.81 feet) along the boundary of said 146th Street to the west boundary of frontage road; thence South 1 degree 23 minutes 17 seconds East 2.043 meters (6.70 feet) along the boundary of said frontage road; thence South 71 degrees 35 minutes 19 seconds East 20.571 meters (67.49 feet) along said frontage road; thence South 2 degrees 39 minutes 48 seconds East 11.964 meters (39.25 feet) along said boundary; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West 154.405 meters (506.58 feet) to the west line of the owner's land; thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 20.975 meters (68.82 feet) along said west line to the point of beginning and containing 0.3122 hectares (0.772 acres) more or less. EXCEPT: (EXISTING R/W) A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana described as follows: Beginning on the north line of said section South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West (asSl.UDed bearing) 60.960 meters (200.00) feet) from the northeast comer of said section; thence South 1 degree 23 minutes 17 seconds East 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) to the south boundary of 146th Street; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West 134.360 meters (440.81 feet) to the west line of the owner's land; thence North 0 degrees 13 minutes 46 seconds West 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) along said west line to said north line; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds East 134.258 meters (440.48 feet) along said north line to the point of beginning and containing 0.0675 hectares (0.167 acres) more or less. EXCEPT: (SHELL PIPELINE) Parcel #4 Liebtag Located in the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, described as follows: Beginning at a point 115.5 feet West of the Northeast comer of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East; thence South 28 degrees 18 minutes West to an iron post, a distance of 41 0.75 feet to an iron post; thence South 44 degrees 13 minutes West to an iron post, a distance of 461.5 feet to an iron post; thence South 41 degrees 0 minutes to an iron post, a distance of927.7 feet to an iron post located 67 feet East of the Southwest comer of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section. Parcel #5 Pappas A part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, located in Clay Township, Hamilton County, Indiana, being more specifically described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the East line of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, . Range 3 East, said Point of Beginning being South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds (assumed bearing) 1360.30 feet from the Northeast comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 680.35 feet (measured, 680.2 feet Deed) on and along the East line of said Northeast Quarter to a point being North 00 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds 600.80 feet from the Southeast comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 88 degrees 54 minutes 30 seconds West 1305.13 feet parallel with the South line of said Northeast Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 01 minutes 27 seconds West 680.20 feet; thence North 88 degrees S4 minutes 07 seconds East 1305.42 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 20.38 acres more or less, being subject to the right of way grant for U.S. Road Number Thirty One and the right of way grant for a frontage road adjacent to U.S. Road Number Thirty One, leaving 18.37 acres more or less, being subject to all applicable easements and rights of way of record. Parcels #6 & #7 Walter Tract A and Tract B in A Replat of Part of Walter's Plaza Replat, the plat of which is recorded in Plat Book 2, page 267 in the Office of the Hamilton County Recorder, Hamilton County, Indiana. Parcel #8 Thornberry Apart of the East half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East in Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of the said half Quarter Section, said point being 640.58 feet West of the Northeast Comer of said half Quarter Section. Continue thence Westwardly along and with the aforesaid North line 170.00 feet; thence Southwardly parallel to the East line of said East half Quarter Section 310.00 feet; thence Eastwardly parallel to the North line of aforesaid Half quarter Section 170.00 feet; thence Northwardly 310.00 feet to the place of beginning, containing 1.200 acres, more or less. Parcel #9 Hofmann A Part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East in Hamilton County, Indiana, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, South 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West (assumed bearing) 1092.21 feet from the Northeast comer of said Northeast Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 57 minutes 39 seconds West 355.68 feet; thence South 88 degrees 46 minutes 42 seconds West 206.95 feet to the West line of said East Half; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 50 seconds West on and along said West line 355.55 feet to the Northwest comer of said East Half; thence North 88 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds East on and along said North line 213.00 feet, to the place of beginning. Except that part deeded to the Board of County Commissioner by Warranty Deed dated May 4, 1998 and recorded July 16, 1998 as Instrument No. 98-38949, in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana, being more particularly described as follows: A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North line of said Section South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West (assumed bearing) 332.906 meters (1092.21 feet) from the Northeast comer of said Section, said point is at a Northeast comer of the owner's land; then South 00 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds West 5.033 meters (16.51 feet) along an East line of the owner's land; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes, 43 seconds West 64.705 meters (212.29 feet) to a West line of the owner's land; thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes S3 seconds West 5.030 meters (16.50 feet) along said West line to said North line; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds East 64.791 meters (212.57 feet) along said North line to the point of beginning and containing 0.0326 hectares (0.80 acres) more or less. Also except that part deeded to the Board of County Commissioners by W manty Deed dated May 4, 1998, and recorded July 16, 1998 as Instrument No. 98-38950, in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana, being more particularly described as follows: A part of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 24. Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast comer of said section; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds West (assumed bearing) 332.906 meters (1092.21 feet) to a prolonged East line of the owner's land; thence South 00 degrees 46 minutes 52 second West 5.033 meters (16.51 feet) along said prolonged East line to the point of beginning of this description, which point is on the South boundary of 146lh Street; thence continuing South 00 degrees 46 minutes 52 seconds West i 4.982 meters (49.15 feet) along an East line of the owner's land; thence South 88 degrees 36 minutes West 64.449 meters (211.45 feet) to the West line of the owner's land; thence North 00 degrees 11 minutes 53 seconds West 14.974 meters (49.13 feet) along said West line to the boundary of said 146th Street; thence North 88 degrees 36 minutes 43 seconds East 64.705 meters (212.29 feet) along said boundary to the point of beginning and containing 0.0967 hectares (0.239 acres) more or less. . . . . . . . . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ) ) ~ ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) _n - co ~ .- ..0 .- ...c x WJ CERTIFICATION OF THE CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION ON THE PETITION OF THE CITY OF CARMEL DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES TO AMEND THE CARMEL/CLAY ZONING ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO INDIANA CODE 36-7-4-605 ORDINANCE No. Z-386-02 U.S. Highway 31 & 146tb Street Planned Unit Development District To: The Honorable Common Council Of the City of Carmel Hamilton County, Indiana Dear Members: The Carmel/Clay Plan Commission otTers you the following report on the application of the Lauth Property Group (Docket No. 127-01 Z) petitioning the Commission to establish the U.S. Highway 31 & 14rJ" Street Planned Unit Development District. The area affected is generally located on the southwest comer of East 146lh Street and U.S. Highway 31, Hamilton County, Indiana. The Carmel/Clay Plan Commission's recommendation on the petition of the Lauth Property Group is FAVORABLE. At a special meeting held Tuesday, June 4, 2002, the Carmel/Clay Plan Commission voted nine (9) in Favor, zero (0) Opposed, zero (0) Abstaining, to forward to the Common Council the proposed Ordinance No. Z-386-02 with a Favorable Recommendation. Please be advised that by virtue of the Plan Commission's Favorable Recommendation, pursuant to IC 36-7-4- 607(e), the Council has ninety (90) days to act on this petition before it becomes effective as Certified by the Commission. Ninety days from the date of this Certification is Monday, September 2,2002. CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION . - DATED: June 7, 2002 : <....'~::.,:~:: RECE1VED ',. :a - 7 aJll2 CARMEL CLERK TREAsureR ~ iJ.' 'l"_ .. .' ,~OfC~~:;;;::. ......>>~t~.\ ~.l ^ ~ ~1.\ ':::.{~{Q" .~~()" u u City of Carmel DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING Mr. Jeffrey A. Clayton, PE American Consulting, Inc. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256-0270 P 17 .,fD \~t.\/Ol-' October 15,2002 RE: Clay Terrace-Project Review #1 Dear Mr. Clayton: We have reviewed the dIawing submitted for this project and offer the following comments: GENERAL INFORMATION I. The project site is located within current City of Carmel Corporate Limits. 2. Jurisdictions: . Street and Right of Way - City of Cannel. . Water, Sanitary Sewer, Stonn Sewer - City of Cannel. 3. Board of Public Works and Safety Approval Requirements: . Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability. · Commercial Curb Cut. Please provide an exhibit that shows the location of the curb cut and acell/decellanes if applicable; appropriate dimensions including drive width, overall width at the street, aceWdecel dimensions, radii, etc.; and location of existing opposing curb cuts, if applicable. The exhibit should be 8 Y2 x 11 or of a size that can be reduced to 8 Y2 x 11 such as 8 Y2 x 14 or 11 x 17. . Temporary Construction Entrance. Same requirements as for the Commercial CuIb Cut. . Any permanent improvement to be installed within dedicated right of way. . Consent to Encroach Agreements for any permanent improvement to be installed within dedicated easements. If an irrigation system is planned for this project, additional Water and Sewer Availability approval will be required from the Board. . Secondary Plat approval (if applicable). . Right of Way Dedication (if not platted). I am enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board. Any submission to the Board requires prior final approval by the Carmel Qay Plan Commission and/or the Board of Zoning Appeals and completion of review by the Technical Advisory Committee. AU written requests to be place on the Board's agenda must include the appropriate Docket Numbers and the date (or dates) of approval by the Plan Commission and/or BZA. 4. Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability (acreage) and Connection Fees: . Availability (acreage) Fees are based upon total acreage (legal description) @ $1,010.00 per acre for water and $1,365.00 per acre for sanitary sewer. Please provide a legal description, with totiI acreage, for the property being developed. · Connection Fees are based upon the average user factor tables.from Section 9-35 (water) and 9- 200 (sanitary) of our Utility Ordinance. The Connection Fees are $1,310.00 per EDU for water and $795.00 per EDU for sanitary sewer. We will eventually require detailed data regarding proposed use of the buildings, square footage, etc. Please provide this office the total seating ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571.2441 - . u u Mr. Jeffrey A. Clayton October 15,2002 Page 2 ,-. capacity of each restaurant planned for this development. To arrive at the total Connection Fees, multiply the nwnber of seats by 0.10 EDUslseat equals the total nwnber of ED Us. Multiply the total EDUs by the Connection Fee for water (SI,310.00IEDU) and sanitary sewer (S795.00IEDU). I am enclosing copies of our Average User Factors for Water and Sanitary Sewers and our current fee schedule. I have also highlighted the Average User Factors that might apply to this development. Note: Any deviation from the Connection Fee calculations listed in our Ordinance wiU require Carmel Utilities and Board of Public Works and Safety approvals. 5. T AC ReviewlDrawings submitted for approval: We request that all comments and comment letters generated by this office be answered in writing and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for construction until all issues have been resOlved. All Carmel Utility issues must also re resolved. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. This office will require five- sets of approved drawings after all issues have been resolved. The drawings will be stamped approved and signed by both the City Engineer and Director Carmel Utilities. The Developer/Owner will receive one-set which is to be maintained on the construction site at all times. Carmel Utilities will receive two-sets. Our Public Works Inspector will receive one-set and one-set will be maintained in the Department of Engineering. If more than five-sets are requested to be approved, the additional sets must be submitted with the five required sets. 6. Please be advised that any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the OwnerlDeveloper and the City of Carmel. This Agreement requires Board of Public Works and Safety approval. Installations within dedicated right of way require separate Board approval. 7. Carmel Utilities does not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted directly for all water main and sanitary sewer main locations. 8. Carmel Utilities will provide a separate review of this project for water and sanitary sewer issues. 9. I am including copies of the following with this correspondence: . Commercial Project Approval Procedures. . Performance Release Procedure. . Pennit Data, Contacts, etc. . Commercial Permitting Procedures. I will send a copy of our Residential Subdivision and Commercial Irrigation System Requirements upon request. . 1. BONDING REQUIREMENTS --. 10. Upon initial review, it appears the following bonding requirements may apply to this project: Performance Guarantees . Streets . Curbs o Water Mains o Sanitary Sewers o Storm Sewers o Monwnent & Markers (if a platted development). . Street Signs . Sidewalk (in right of way) Please provide individual, detailed certified Engineers Estimates for 100010 of the cost of labor and materials for the above improvements. Post individual Performance Guarantees in the amount of the Engineer's Estimates. Three-year Maintenance Guarantees will be required upon release of the Performance Guarantees. l u u Mr. Jeffrey A. Clayton October 15, 2002 Page 3 Street Cut/Right of Way Permit and Bonding Requirements Any work in dedicated right of way will require a Street CutlRight of Way Permit and a License and Permit Bond The bond amount will be determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way (curb cut. storm sewer work. etc.) @ $2,000.00 per instance. PROJECT COMMENTS 11. Please provide drainage calculations. We reserve the opportunity for further review and submission of comments regarding drainage upon receipt of such calculations. 12. It is our assumption that the storm sewer system, with the exception of right of way structures and pipe, will be private. 13. Sheet C2.0 . The frontage road right of way to be vacated will require Carmel City Council approval. . Is there a traffic signal planned on Rangeline Road between the two round a bouts? . This office would like to review the round-a-bout designs. . Please indicate lane configurations at all intersections. . Are the dashed and solid lines across the pavement pedestrian crossings? 14. Sheet C3.1 . Are sidewalks/paths planned in the public right of way? · Is it acceptable to have a drive and storm inlets over the pipeline at the west side of the development? . The intersection located midway on the west side of the development will be a difficult intersection due to the configuration. Likewise for the intersection further south on this sheet. . The skewed parking arrnngement may be confusing and make aisle entries difficult. 15. Sheet C3.2 · Please show the existing eastern portion of the intersection of Rangeline Road and U.S. 31 including lanes, etc. · Has it been determined that the detention pond pool elevations of 813.00 can be achieved? What is the elevation of the water table? · Does Walter Street connect elsewhere? If so, it may end up being used as a short cut or cut- through. May require signage to deter traffic. 16. Parking Lot Design: Some difficulties may be found in the skewed alignment of parking spaces. Certain intersections are ", very confusing. Many aisle lane entries are extremely wide (70'+). This office would be interested in 1 discussing alternative solutions to these issues. We reserve the right to provide additional review and comments upon receipt of detailed construction drawings and drainage calculations. The above comments are based upon the Engineering Department's initial review. Please provide our office with a follow up letter and revised plans, indicating all revisions. A second review will focus only on revised items. It is critical that our office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our initial review. If you have questions, please contact Kate Weese or me at 571-2441. . " u Mr. ~effrey A. Clayton October 15,2002 Page 4 srLtIL Dick Hill, Assistant Director Department ofEngineeriIig Enclosures cc: M. Kate Weese, City Engineer , Mike McBride, Assistant City Engineer Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services Laurence Lillig, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Director of Cannel Utilities Paul Pace, Distribution Jim Haag, Collection S:\PROJREV02\CLAYTERRACE u ;; ~ - ER ON AND SEDIMENT CONT L PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org SUBMITTED BY: Mr. Joe Downs Lauth Property Group 9777 N, College Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46280 Mr. Jeff Clayton American Consulting 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256 ~ , f) ~ ,,\ ~ / \U( PROJECT NAME: Clay Terrace REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 10/14/02 Acreage: ?? LOCATION: S W comer of US31 and 146th Street LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 24 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 44 The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer, The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may be requested to fUrther evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. X Refer to the comments section for additional information. Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted: Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be aflexible document, with provisions to modifY or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4 / 97 ~ ERYnoN AND SEDIMENT CONT&iL PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS .. PROJECT: Clay Terrace Page 2 of2 Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents. Comments- The existing wells neeed to be abandon according to local and state statue. A full erosion and sediment control plan needs to be approved by the Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District prior to any earthwork or clearing activity. Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor Ha. Co. Highway File u Q C~LJrmeI aJrtment October 8, 2002 Mr. Jeff Clayton American Consulting, INC. 7260 Shadeland Station Indianapolis, IN 46256-0270 RE: Clay Terrace /f/9"-oc:;:{ ~.,2)p IN20020211 Dear Mr. Clayton: I have received and reviewed the information for the above-mentioned project. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. If we can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully lttv-W:D. -4a~ Michael D. Fogartj Chief of Police MDF:vb cc: Dept. of Community Services FAX (;)17) 571.2512 (;)].7) 571.2500 A Nationally Accredit " orcement Agency ~ fR]~(C~1\'1lr~rFJI DCT 9 2002 DOCS ''): u u CARMEL/CLA Y TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITS AGENDA ~~~L, ill'It) ~~1 <6 ?lJVi, t)QCS Date: Place: 9'00 ~ m 9'20 ~ m 9'40 ~ m 10'10 ~ m 10',:\0 ~ m 10'-<;0 ~ m October 16, 2002 Department of Community Services Conference Room 3rd Floor - Carmel City BaD Carmel Oay Historical Society (Use Variance Development Plan) The applicant se~ks Sapproval tOthconstructhan.additiOnaldstructure"dThe sit~ i~ h M.,1'I'~' located at 211 FIrSt treet Sou west. T e site is zone R-2lResl ence Within t e fVIJ Old Town Overlay Zone. Filed by Balay Architects for the Carmel Clay Historical Society. Lakeside Park, Section One (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans) The site is located on the southwest comer of West 141st Street and Towne Road. *- The site is zoned S-llResidence - Very Low Density. .) Filed by Dennis Olmstead of Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc. for Roehling Enterprises, Inc. Lakes at Hayden Run, Section Two (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans) The site is located on the north side of West 131 at Street approximately one-- ~ quarter mile west of Towne Road. The site is zoned S-llResidential- Very LOW" Density. Filed by Dennis Olmstead of Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc. for Centex Homes. Village of West Clay, BeUen WeDs Building (Construction Plans) The site is located at the southeast comer of 131 at Street and Towne Road within tf. the Village of West Clay. The site is zoned PUD/Planned Unit Development. Filed by Dave Sexton of the Schneider Corporation for Brenwick TND Communities. The Villas at Sweet Charity Farms (primary Plat) The applicant seeks approval to plat a 52-lot residential subdivision on 34.51 4-' acres. The site is located on the south side of 141st Street 1/8 mile east of Towne Road. The site is zoned S-llResidence - Estate. Filed by Rich Kelly ofEMH&T for Justus Home Builders, Inc. Laura Vista Subdivision (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans) The applicant seeks approval to plat a 55-lot residential subdivision on 34.94 ' acres. The site.is generally located south of Danbury Estates subdivision between q/1 SR 421 and the Foster Estates Subdivision. The site is zoned R-IlResidence. . "- Filed by Brandon Burke of The Schneider Corporation for Primrose Development, LLC. ~t^~~!"I'nf,i,fCj<.'i :1'1"; t::-lf::::t sji~~/P,;,?,:C2- ... " u u 'i page 2 of2 Technical Advisory Committee Agenda / October 16, 2002 11 '20 a m 1"00 P m 1 '00 p m 1 '10 P m 2'00 P m 2'10 P m /#~ Clay Terrace (preliminary Development Plan) The applicant seeks approval of a preliminary development ~lan. The site is t located at the southwest comer of US Highway 31 and East 146 Street. D L Filed by Jeff Clayton of American Consulting, Inc. for the Lauth Property Group. Break for Lunch; 1 hour The meeting will resume at 1 :00 p.m. Motorcycles of Indianapolis (Amended Development Plan) The site is located at 4146 East 96th Street. The site is zoned B-3 (Business). Filed by Bill Keller ofKES Consultants, Inc. for Motorcycles of Indianapolis. Cherry Creek Estates - Formerly Cherry Tree Estates (Primary Plat) The applicant seeks approval to plat a 273-lot residential subdivision on 149.562 acre~. The site is located on the east side of Hazel Dell Parkway north and south of Cherry Tree Road. The site is zoned S-I/Residential- Low Intensity. Filed by Dennis Olmstead of Stoeppelwerth & Associates, Inc. for Platinum Properties, LLC. Providence at Old Meridian (Development Plan Amendment) The applicant seeks approval of an amendment to the approved Development Plan for Providence at Old Meridian. The sit is located at the. northeast comer of West Cannel Drive and Old Meridian Avenue. Filed by Gary Murray of Paul I. Cripe for Buckingham. Clarion Hospital North (Rezone and Development Plan) The site is located at the southwest comer of Pennsylvania parkway and College Avenue. Filed by Joseph M. Scimia of Baker and Daniels for Clarion Health Partners, Inc. Co. .c::.,:.....;.~~d...&A1~ I??:.Z:~;?,... "fl:d,F,fj ~)at('~' ''',. ~c Df: ~ 1C u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com M E M 0 RAN DUM DATE: 10/4/2002 ~Lilll~<:l' /!?~-' ~:z If ~ t' (1.... ~'t .~..~." i"":\ ~~. \. ~: \:-.;\ ~\; v ~~e., g" \. /'\ "''\' v..../\. '1- " /\" " /'"i>. Af ) " .. .....,.'h-. ____-'I ( . ,.,' 'j / '"7----\ ".' "'~' I r"" ~ t \':""- ~~~/ TO: T AC Committee Members FROM: Jeff Clayton RE: Clay Terrace cc: File Included with this memo is a set of Preliminary Development Plans for the Clay Terrace project at 146th Street and US 31. The plans are being submitted in conformance with the ordinance that established the PUD District for this site, Ordinance No. Z-386-02. We have submitted a plan review application to Carmel for the October 16th TAC meeting. Please feel free to contact our office if you have any questions prior to the TAC meeting. Thank you. 1 document2 7 ~ AMERICA~ CONSUL TING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shadeland Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com To: Carmel Dept. of Community Services Date: Project Name: Project Number: 1 0/04/02 Clay Terrace IN20020211 /--Y\\ \}~ITi'(:-> //f., \/__--'---L-L.r~, / /' >'>/ .....( / /'>Y ... ''\& ;}y ').; 'v' ,.:// ""'IEIIMglr) \ '-J ff,\\#;;l\'j \!:> i,-:i~ Oel ~.~ 2002 ~ \>\ noCS k- \f~\ /.. "- ",>>, ~ :':J';~r-r---I---1'''<\ l~ "".c> i i 1'-" '~-~\ LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 We are IZI Enclosed D Mail D As Requested sending you: D Separately via IZI Messenger D For Your Information Deliver by: D Overnight IZI For Your Review & Comment Time: 4:00 D D Date: 10/4/02 QTY. TYPE DESCRIPTION 1 set Preliminary Development Plans 1 copy Memo 1 copy Letter from Lauth properties Remarks: Please return: D Copies to this office Copies of: Trans: Enclosure: To: Very truly yours American Consulting, Inc. x File By: Jeff Clayton o ~ u - IIII!."" LAUTH PROPERTY e GROUP · ~ J-'th ANNIVERSARY -" ....J1 Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 10-03-2002 RCVD Date: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 Re: Clay Terrace SW corner of 146th & US 31 Carmel, Indiana Dear Mr. Dobosiewitz, This correspondence will serve as our request to be included on your upcoming October 16,2002 CarmeVClay Technical Advisory Committee Agenda. In accordance with Section 12, subsection A, of the approved Planned Unit Development Ordinance, the Commission shall approve the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) for any project on the real estate. Please consider this our initial step in obtaining the Commission's approval. Plans will be delivered to you under separate cover by American Consulting Engineers on Friday, October 4. Plans will also be delivered to all other T AC members on this same date. Thank you for your assistance in this process and please feel free to contact me with any questions. SiOCr! ~- --" -- - " ~~- -, __ 0" -.__ ~ C-==~op. nowns ) --- Vice President, Development Lauth Property Group Cc: Jeff Clayton (American Consulting Engineers) Greg Gurnik (Lauth Property Group) Patrick Shea (Lauth Property Group) Gary Shelton (Lauth Property Group) 9777 N. College Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46280 ph 317.848.6500 fx 317.848.6511 Building Real Estate Solutions. Since 1977 www.lauthproperty.com Fax u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4&l32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 To: v#C'ky~" Fax: 6~-0:?7t') Phone: From: Vo yc~ Pages: 0 Date: /0 -,L - O~ Re: "/Ae17o)QQ IO-/'-O~ o Urgent t1 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply CJ Please Recycle , ; ',-./ INDIANAPOLIS BUSINESS JOURNAL · 0 SEPTEMBER 9-15, 2002 · 3 $90Mcenter cleared Upscale retail project planned for Hamilton County in 2004 By Katie Maurer IBJ Reporter A large retail mecca in Hamil- ton County will be getting nearly half a million additional square feet of shops and restaurants with the newly approved Clay Terrace, a $90 million "lifestyle center" planned by a local developer. 0 The Carmel City Council on Sept. 3' approved the 520,000- sqqare-foot project, which will contain 450,000 square feet of retail space and 70,000 square feet of office space. Lau~ Proper- ty Group will develop the center over the next two 'years on 70 acres at 146th Street and U.S. 31 in northern Clay Township. Clay Terrace will join two existing shopping centers in the . immediate vicinity-Village Park Plaza on the east side of U.S. 31 and Greyhound Pass on the west. Construction is expected to begin next spring with the center's opening set for the third quarter of 2004, Lauth President Greg Gurnik said. The price tag includes costs for construction and purchasing the ass~mbled land from 20 separate owners. . Some of the ground-up to 20 acres-will be set aside for an extension of Rangeline Road, which currently ends at U.S. 31. The new road will veer to the northwest and cut through Clay Terrace on its way to 151st Street. As a lifestyle center, Oay Terrace is expected to include several upscale retailers and restaurants in an open-air configuration. The . design of the center, speameaded by Dallas-based RTKL Associates, Win evoke a "main street" feeling, with h~rylan~~ping,~n~es, OO~ door lighting, a variety of storefrontS and open space. Parking will ~ rel- egated to space behind the center. Lauth is not ready to identify potential tenants, but, according to Gumik, many will ~ the same stores typically found in a tradition- al shopping mall. With new mall construction on the decline, many well-known. chains are turning to lifestyle centers for growth, he said. 'There's not a lototnew malls for the retailers to go into and it doesn't make sense for them to be in a typi- cal strip center," Gurnik said. The relatively new concept of a lifestyle center, named for Mem- o phis-based od~veloper Poag & 0 McEwen Lifestyle Centers, is one Of nine distinct shopping concepts recognized by the International Council of Shopping Centers. Last winter, ICSO convened a task force to draw up a defInition . of the popular new retail format and 0 identify some 30 lifestyle centers for an industry report. Of those, 17 are in the warmer climates of Florida, Califofnia, 0 Georgia, South Carolina, Alaba- ma, Tennessee and Texas; seven See RETAIL page 14 . "I MtJ." . ;] Clay Terrace Developer: Lauth Property Group Cost: $90 million Sl~e: 520,000 square feet, 70 acres Components: 450,000 square feet of retail, 70,000 square feet of office proJecled annual relail sales: $188 million Complelion.date: third quarter 2004 c Street c C2J f~ture site of Clay Terrace l',Ti I existing retail - - future Rangellne Road extension Source: Lauth Property Group IBJ Gl1IphlcIBl1Id Turner and Katie Maurer /' .~-. u ~ile ~~. \seems like a heavy dose of retaIl, thbwJea population is actually underserved, consultant Karen Gentle- man of Gentleman Associates said . . "It's a gem of a .site," she s"wd of Lauth's acreage. "I've been in the retail research business since 1980 and I can't recall a site with this kind of development potential." According to herresearch, there is 13.3 square feet .of per-capita shopping center space in the area, compared with the national average of 22 square feet. And demographic data show the population in the region. which covers roost of Hamil- ton County, growing twice as fast as the rest of the Indianapolis area. But some aren't convinced by the num- bers. . "r personally was not comfortable with whether or not that amount of retail was needed," said Wayne WIlson, an at-large m~mber of. the City Council, who, along WIth co~ncIlor Kevin Kirby, voted against the proJect. The vote was 4-2. Councilor Luci Snyder did not vote. WIlson, who is running against Snyder and M~yor Jim Brainard in next May's Repubbcan mayoral primary. said he is concerned that other retail centers in Carm~l could lose tenants to Clay Ter~ race. . He also took issue with the retail use. fr?m a :evenue standpoint. Clay Terrace wIll be 10 a special tax increment fmanc- ing, or TIF. district that taxes revenue cre- ated by the project to fund road improve- ments in the area. Office space would generate much more revenue, Wilson contended, providing that the city would bide its time until the listless office mar- ket rebounded. "r guess I'm one of those individuals who was willing to wait," he said.- r"I !J. ,.. .........~:r.: ..___. RETAIL Continued from page 3 are in the Midwest; four in the West; and two on the East Coast. Nearly all are in affluent areas, according to . the ICSC report. Cold weather can dampen sales at lifestyle centers, but they are usually less expensive to operate than enclosed malls, said Mark Perlstein. a retail broker whose firm. The Linder Co., owns the Mer- chan~s' Square and Merchants' Pointe shopping centers at 1 16th Street and Key- stone Avenue. Unlike a. regional mall, which is enclosed, or a power center, which is anchored by several "big-box" stores, a lifestyle center usually contains several small specialty stores, sit-down dining and entertainment in a village-style out- door setting. According to lCSC, popu- lar tenants at such centers are Gap, Ann Taylor, Banana Republic, Victoria's Secret, Williams-Sonoma. and Pottery Barn. . A true lifestyle center does not have large anchor tenants such as department stores or big boxes like Wal-Mart,Home Depot or Meijer. Most range in size from 150,000 square feet to 500,000 square feet, while a regional ,mall could be as large as 800,000 square feet: Shopping centers around 146th and U.S. 3 f contain at least 1 million square feet and include Target, Wal-Mart, Kohl's, Menard's, Lowe's, Marsh Super~ markets, Barnes & Noble, Galyan'sand Regal Cinema. E mqJ ~-- e, & ="1 IY~Jk( X.4Jr~6s,,~ ~ Fax u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One CiVic Square Canne', IN 4E032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 ~f/~ Fax: S-Y3- Cb?7o Phone: From= ~ Pages: ~ Date= /t!)-- /-C70{ Re: cc: o Urgent o For Review 0 P.lease Comment 0 Please Reply Cl Please Recycle I~ r " '.j u ~ u ~"'- IIIIIII!I _'" LAUTH PROPERTY · GROUP · ~ ",.,tlt ANNIVERSARY --' --' ~ RECEIVED OCT 3 _~_- - -- DOCS Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 Date: Tuesday, October 01,2002 ,\>~ -O-V .&/ lvX Re: Clay Terrace SW corner of 146th & US 31 Carmel, Indiana Dear Mr. Dobosiewitz, This correspondence will serve as our request to be included on your upcoming October 16,2002 CarmeVClay Technical Advisory Committee Agenda. In accordance with Section 12, subsection A, of the approved Planned Unit Development Ordinance, the Commission shall approve the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) for any project on the real estate. Please consider this our initial step in obtaining the Commission's approval. Plans will be delivered to you under separate cover by American Consulting Engineers on Friday, October 4. Plans will also be delivered to all other T AC members on this same date. Thank you for your assistance in this process and please feel free to contact me with any questions. _S'f! -~--_.._- -. --.... ..--.....--... ~ '---..- - -. '-. '-. - . . "-.. - . ~--"'~"'-.'--" ---- ~-"-------~~ ('/ -~ '-------- Jot': Downs ...-/ Vice President, Development Lauth Property Group Cc: ~fClayton (American Consulting Engineers) Greg Gurnik (Lauth Property Group) Patrick Shea (Lauth Property Group) Gary Shelton (Lauth Property Group) 9777 N. College Avenue Indianapolis. IN 46280 ph 317.848.6500 fx 317.848.6511 Building Real Estate Solutions' Since 1977 www.lauthproperry.com u u AMERICAN CONSULTING, INC. Architects Consultants Engineers 7260 Shade1and Station, Indianapolis, IN 46256 (317) 547-5580 FAX: (317) 543-0270 info@amercons.com MEMORANDUM DATE: 10/1/2002 ~I'c ~ tltl' tly/,O I. OOes TO: Jon Dobosiewicz FROM: Jeff Clayton RE: Cly Terrace File cc: Jon, included with this memo are two set of Preliminary Development Plans and a plan review application for the Clay Terrace project at 146th and US 31. The plans are being submitted in conformance with the ordinance that established the PUD District for this site, Ordinance No. 2-386-02. As discussed, we will provide the TAC members with plans this Friday and, at the same time, provide your office with two more sets of plans that will be current with the plans delivered to the T AC members. Thank you for taking the time to talk with me today. We look forward to working with your department on this project. Please call if you have any questions. ~~ C' ~ ~ "- document4 OS/21/02 16:35 FAX u HAMILTON CO HWY. ~~armel DOCD ~ 001/001 HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT May 21, 2002 ~ 4'AR}fcEIVED n 21 9. t.v').,~ t:.UtJ/ DOCS . -. Mr. Mike Hollibaugh Carmel Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 RE: Lauth Property Development Conceptual Site Plan S of 146111 Street / W of US 31 Clay Township Dear Mike: This letter serves to inform you of several issues that were discussed in a meeting with the Lauth Property Group, A&F Engineering and the Highway Department concerning the above-mentioned plans. A plan dated 5/2102 was received by the Highway Department on 5/16/02. The Highway Department agrees conceptually with the plan for planning and general zoning considerations, however there are several issues that needed further investigation before any final construction or platting approvals are granted by the Hamilton County Highway Department. The issues are listed below. 1. A Traffic Study to be performed by A&F Engineering for this area in needed. The Study will needs to show that a 2012 Level of Service "C" and a 2022 level of Service "0" can be achieved from the ramps through the 1461h Street Intersection. The traffic volumes shall be estimated assuming the ramps are Installed. 2. Minimum Right of Way along 146th Street shall be granted In accordance with the Hamilton County Thoroughfare Plan. From the Intersection of Western Way and 146th Street to point 500' to the east and 500' to the west, the right of way is an 85' half. From that point to the eastern and western property fine, the right of way is a 75' half. 3. The right of way dimensions for the Interior street are repres~ntatlve only. The exact width for this right of way will be determined by the Highway Department after a more detailed plan for the site and roadway engineering is completed. This may lead to adjustments in the building locations after the final determinations for rlght of way are completed. If you have any questions or comments concerning this letter. please feel free to contact me at anytime. 57-'13___ ~teven J. Broermann Staff Engineer cc: Jon Doboslewicz Steve Cash Mike Hpward Clint Sparks 1700 South 10th Street Noblesville, In. 46060 www.co.hamilton.in.us Office (317) 773-7770 Fax (317) 776-9814