The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence o o CI EL JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR January 27,2003 Ms. Becky R. Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240-3809 RE: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center /13-DX Al:t:.s Dear Ms. Feigh: This correspondence is to inform you that we have approved the construction plans for this project. The approved set of plans that are to be maintained on the construction site are now available in our office. Please arrange to have these plans picked up. There are still two requirements that have not been completed: . Payment of Water and Sanitary Sewer Connection Fees in the total amount of $27,996.00. I am enclosing a copy of our calculation sheet for our use. Payment has been deferred with the approval of Carmel Utilities. Water meters will not be installed until Connection Fees have been paid for this development. . Dedication of additional right of way, including Old Meridian Street, Guilford Road and the proposed roundabout at Old Meridian and Guilford through our Board of Public Works and Safety. Right of way dedication will be required prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy (e.O.) for the site. Also, it appears (from the drawings) that you are planning to open cut Guilford for gas service. Please be reminded that open pavement cuts in dedicated streets require Board of Public Works and Safety approval prior to the commencement of construction. If you have questions, please call. P;1/x6 Dick Hill, Assistant Director Department of Engineering Cc: M. Kate Weese, City Engineer Mike McBride, Assistant City Engineer Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Carmel Utilities Jeff Kendall/Gayle Stahl, Building and Code Enforcement S:\LETTERS03\CARAMBULA TORY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441, FAX 317.571-2439 EMAIL kweese@ci.carmel.in.us o o December 23,2002 'CI EL ~ O~.. Ct\\jt~\'.,f) JAMES BRAINARD, MAYOR \' ,- 1)'1 1\\\1;'- ~<;""('. i.J <;..-.1 \ \"'\' ,... '- ' U\Jes Ms, Becky R, Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240-3809 RE: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endo Center-Project Review #2 /30<- t?;? zv The following comments are a result of the final review of your revised plans by Kate Weese and Mike McBride. Resolution of these final issues will result in approval of the plans for this project. We will require a minimum of 5-sets of final approved construction plans. Carmel Utilities will receive 2-sets, our Public Works Inspector will receive I-set, I-set will be maintained in the Engineering Office and the final set is to be maintained on the construction site. Item #11 Updated Old Meridian Plans should be incorporated. Median break on Old Meridian will be centered on St. Vincent's new Ambulatory Center Drive. When will accelldecel design be complete to the point where they can be added to the drawings? Please provide an entrance detail on the plans, Item #17 Roundabout right of way has not been indicated. Right of way should be shown in accordance with commitments attendant to approval of rezone petition Z-389-02. Item #21 It is our understanding that this development will be responsible for the cost of the path on Old Meridian, whether they are installed with this project or as part of the Old Meridian project. Item #26 Pond outlet (Structure 8) has conflicting TC Elevation between table on C200 and Detail 7, C601. Other It was our understanding that an emergency inlet/outlet would be provided to Guilford. Please indicate on the plans. Please share these comments with all persons to be associated with this project including the Owner/Developer, Contractors, etc. If you have questions, please contact Kate Weese, Mike McBride or me at 571-2441. ~ Dick Hill, Assistant Director Department of Engineering Enclosures cc: M. Kate Weese, City Engineer Mike McBride, Assistant City Engineer Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of Community Services Laurence Lillig, Department of Community Services John Duffy, Carmel Utilities DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING S:\PROJREV02\CARAMBSURGREVISED ONE CIVIC SQUARE, CARMEL, IN 46032 OFFICE 317.571.2441, FAX 317.571-2439 E!\WL kweese@cLcarmel.in,us u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Cannel, IN 4&l32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax To' /~ ~J Fax: fit:). 7:?jy (J ::1,Mhned ~ Pages: ~ /~ . /;< -tJ :J.. ~ .-/ From: Date: CCI o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle {~b 11 ,; 'fn;4 /Jbc ' //3 -tJ;< 46LS u u " CITY OF CARMEL : Department ~com~unity S~rviC~S " One Civic Square Cannel, IN 4E032 (:317) 571-2417 Fax: (:317) 571-2425 Fax T.. ~~ Fax: J?9- 7 d i'f , From: ~ tL' Pages: Phone: Date: /C1- &, - 0 ~ Roo ~~"j?! ~ C~ C~ ~~ o/.:L..k ~ //..3 -ax A">k> . ARCHITECTURE. ENGINEERING. INTERIOR DESIGN AND A CONTINUUM OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO City of Carmel City Hall 1 Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 DATE 06 December 2002 ATTENTION Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz PROJECT Carmel Surgery Center Carmel, Indiana Plan Commission Meeting COPIES DOCUMENT NO. DOCUMENT DATE DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE 20 Revised Site Drawing and Building B Elevations REMARKS Please distribute to the Plan Commission Members A. B. C. D. E. FROM Becky R. Feigh/mjg F. Action indicated on Item transmitted For your information For signature & retum to this office Fumish as submitted Fumish as corrected - resubmittal required Fumish as corrected . no resubmittal required Revise and resubmit For your approval COPIES TO G. H. 528002 TRANSMITTAL LETTER 9365 COUNSELORS ROW, SUITE 300 INDIANAPOLIS, IN /46240-3809 .819.7878 PH /317.819.7288 FAX www.bsadesign.com (' .U r' \ U CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4€032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax gkr-/ !l:c~k.5 To: L;~~ kE~j) , 1; v Fax: . 633--.f97~ , From: vt/) c5{ Pages: Phone: Date: ~'- <<7- Oa.. Re: ~/;;/ 5Ue~ (~7)/.lJ/~ cc: I o Urgent 0 For Review 0 PIease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle bC./-R/ AI~. //3-0~ 4J)L-5 DY/7Je/ ~mL5J/a~7 $~ ~~,?do C~ o u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax ~d #l!-S. To~ &1/ kV4ti Fax: 633 - ~9 7~ From: J;/l \3' //~ ?Jc5( Pages: Phone: Date: Re~S~C/4/~d &.5 ~?'/J/7l/ -4e cc: I' o Urgent 0 Far Review 0 Please Comment 0 Ple3Se Reply o Please Recycle flOC~E::--/- ;I/o, // .3 -6Z5? A2J./6 Cz-//TJe/ 4/71Lu/a7l7 <5UClQl~ cYr-- u u JJ/11~2- I :----- ~ ~UR.~ \. .._J41~~~ : - ~~~tl:_~ '- I.,. . l. . t .' .~"------- ~.-..-...... _"... ...__.. _~_. J=~~c!___BdlJf_~E--=o:rlC>N.$ ~ M ~.&t....S~~~.~CES,. I. ..~....~. tJ()'~i1)~'REY..,.s~b 1~.,.---~-1-~-~-' , . 1- . -- .-. - - d . r~. . ,\ j ~~==~~-- L ... .~_ I ,j [.-:. . ..: .::::_-- l_..~"_~ ~~~~~: Citp!!~LI(I1~ l.__--~~.~- _ ~~~~_~_._. - E\lE~~2@E:_~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~@,.~.:n> ~~~ I - . eo~~\:u~ 'c!E. ~$'\l4'i ~c.~~ I'.~-:=.. . -~~~~~~~~-9-~~\VL c.~_ ..~-~~~--~~ . . . 1_- -f-WA~_':""~/L ..........:IlK ~t.s: __.__ ['--~-r---.L~L-..J:~ ~_~~"Th~~__ I' ~ ~. c:::1"'- ~ __. - . ~~ ~ 1 ~~~~ _'_'_l.l~ ~-~-::t])~~ I J_~~~J:~~._ ~ ! - -~-~---~-~- ~::~:~::~--f::~--~~)~ ~ ~~ ~ ~-------___~___ _~. . ill .l" · 0' 5~ .. -o~~Wmalr'~tI.l\~~~8 p-'~:e:...-~~~~~ \....O~~~f$IQ!~~'~o~~_ii<<._\lf.I"-~S._ L~~.s ~a~s ~eee.r",.~_.~&!) &"lLt=o~:. ~~_ ~~~~"s.._~OA&~~tJ<<~ a..-o~_.s~ W"'Pr\..\... ~~~_~@.\~_ ~~tl. u w CITY OF CARMEL Department Of Community SelVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4&l32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax TO:~~ , Fax: 633.; /f'9 7 :L From. ~ LJ. Pages: Phone: Date: //-/~ -02- . Re: //3 - 0:1 /If)LS~ cc: o Urgent 0 For Review 0 PJease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle ,:;):8 :2 - () 2.. 2. t.J ."133 -1)2 zw o/.~ I I l-- I----~ u u Ujrl./6" WIll b . '"T't> "" - 'D t:>.1T ~ a::>tt..rE-- ~ ~- bE.~ ;I.s: !: . _~ P\J6\... ~ ~ - -;;;;;;;;:'( ~J<) ,-naPS ~,. - b13/ ~~ ~A1 kY" ~"'"'" ~ T4/'S 5Y ~~ . :: I, , I Wt\- XJo) !5"'" - TIl\.P.5 ""~ -rHJt.y ~'!t~ FP.M - ~~V,"'" Or- -e~~ 'It! /'71I_1!i.1!1!i ~\JIJ rry ~Mb~S-U-p_-n""~ /tf1EL--IlJ!l. I I ! i i - ! 4 ~E:..&Jt'1 - a"~ &~ , ! '\ I I 1)) ~ott.. olt &i6J.J)~ i iL- II ~ 'II I ' I! I Ic.:s-o--z.- ~ f7.W; U l\/'?-/6~ /A,.4')AA~ 5~'" ~~~~, - --.,,- --- . ~ . - ~ {. ~ - :-. I I l I I [ -- I [~- .. - ~..b:nP~_: -;. Z~~m~ _.=- ~ I -1- _~_ ~.~_Z-~~_" O"'~It;Jt,_ ~oed.: b- --- tl~--~-' ::- AbLS' -~=~- ~~~ ~- . I II ~~~..:._._i' __~____rlT\ :jWAY")l>:- ---- I Wft-\ ~-1~~'. ~~C&:~~r\L~s oJ 1. &\)\\.~~,.~(i ~~J~..: _8.&1< ~ F",Y-._e.e- ffe&~ 6 - f/2 - 1/ '" I-.~~~ -==~~ . II ~~~-, ,4 .._._-_.,~ II~- ,,_._- 1-~' .' l. II ~_~~~. I~~ ~- 1- . [-> - -= It' /0;. , l.. (.- . !~~ ! i' To: Mr. Jim Brainard - Mayor, Carmel Indiana Mr. Kevin Kirby - Carmel City Council Mr. Ron Carter - Carmel City Council Ms. Luci Snyder - Carmel City Council Mr. Wayne Wilson - Carmel City Council Mr. Robert Battreall - Carmel City Council Mr. Noonan Rundle - Carmel City Council Mr. John Kiven - Carmel City Council Members Carmel Clay Planning Commission Dear Members of the Carmel Clay Planning Commission The purpose ofthis letter is to express our concern and frustration regarding certain development activities in the area designated as the "Old Meridian Corridor" (OMC). We the undersigned, represent a majority of the residences that own homes on Guilford Avenue and/or Wildwood Drive. Our concern stems from what we see as a number of modifications to a comprehensive plan (the Old Meridian Corridor plan) that was passed with much debate and expense. The debate was proper and constructive and rightly included those of us that are neighbors to the area. The city hired a talented architect from Scheer and Scheer Inc. Cincinnati to assist in the foonulation and presentation of the plan. The plan was passed a short time ago. Now as the frrst developments in the designated area are being planned and presented, this Commission is being asked to modify the plan. Some modifications are substantial some may not be considered substantial. However, in their entirety, they represent a morphing of the original plan to a final product that will likely look and feel different from the original vision. Specifically, one such modification is of great concern to us. During the OMC planning process, our neighborhoods expressed great concern about the future of the property bordered by Old Meridian on the west, Guilford Ave. on the east and Main street (131 st Street) on the south. Much to our surprise, we were asked to participate in the process. We truly appreciated having our concerns and input heard. After the initial plan was established, we asked the architect to visit our neighborhood. We wanted her to see first hand the proximity of our street to the OMC area and discuss how our residential street could coexist with the planned development. Ingress and egress on Guilford along with the type and look of neighboring development was our biggest concern. Our first meeting concluded with our group having a better understanding of the OMC goal and we scheduled second meeting. In both cases the architect visited us in our home during the evening hours. After the two visits she was convinced that Guilford access was an issue and that the traffic should be directed to the boulevard that was going to be upgraded to accommodate the commercial traffic. Eliminating a commercial use curb cut on Guilford also worked to enhance the integration of the Meadow Lark Park trail with the OMC area and the schools. She also understood the safety issue of adding a commercial use curb cut on Guilford. She made modifications to her plan, the OMC plan was submitted and was passed. ;'I.". Planning Commission - Old Meridian Corridor Page 2 ~ . This was not the first time the issue was discussed. When the developers for the "Spine Institute" TWO building project was proposed, the developers showed a curb cut on Guilford. Our neighborhood raised the issue of safety and moving traffic to the road that would best handle the commercial traffic, that road being Old Meridian Street. In 1992 the city agreed with our assessment and the curb cut was eliminated. The committee should be reminded that the original "Spine Institute" proposal was for TWO buildings. This past spring Mayor Brainard was gracious enough to meet with us regarding the OMC project. We asked to see the Mayor because a number of us were considering substantial home modifications both in scope and expense. Mayor Brainard asked Mike Hollibaugh to attended. During our meeting Mayor Brainard reiterated the city's commitment the OMC project as it was passed. We left that meeting again feeling good about the plan and how our neighborhoods could coexist within the area. Now you are receiving some of the first proposals for development in the OMC area. One such proposal is the Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center, proposed as 13421 Old Meridian Street. This proposal is essentially for the second building of the site although it has been modified from the original plan of having the mirror image building of the original Spine Institute building. The developer, consistent with the OMC plan is NOT proposing a curb-cut on Guilford Ave. However, much to our disbelief, a Department of Community Services employee is asking for a curb cut. This is unbelievable to us. We can only conclude that there is some mistake or the Mr. Dobosiewicz is unaware ofthe historyofthis issue or does not take the careful planning of the original OMC very seriously. We were certainly hopeful that after the city of Carmel agreed with our position on two prior occasions and a reaffirmation of the city's commitment to the project by the Mayor, we could rest easily about the process of OMC development moving forward. Apparently that may be a mistake. We are hopeful that this issue can be put to rest once and for all. Over the past 10 years our neighborhood has been inundated with development around our homes. On more than one occasion we have had to come before this body (Carmel Clay Planning Commission) to report about promised landscaping plans that have been abandoned. On one occasion this body had to impose a bond requirement to hold the developer to the original landscaping plan. One only needs to take a quick lap around the parking lot of the Spine Institute building and see how those "nice grass landscape islands" are doing. /It.~ planning Commission - Old Meridian Corridor Page 3 We thank you for your time and consideration and hope for a quick resolution to this matter. I, Sincerely, ;" . The Residence of Wildwood Drive and Guilford Ave. r:if/ "J .' I ./' I' t:~;'2 . . .., .~(:t.' ,..:P / 7 ~j. j ./J i,.r- "j !J,..AA-- ;R..D 'w cC!.C{)/v~ . iLttJ r72 J~~"I J. Vb-P .9 ~ 40 ;tU;R~~~ ~. J!/M~~ . )f6 -~. . ~ ~.. < ~ -1.-0 )1-~ O~ K~ ~Jr A~ gn W,t..b v.rc:ro h. .D) ~, ~.:i(.~ gb cJid) wou. 1:) Dtz.-, ~R~~' 11 '}. /I r7' \, t 4 ~ ,( ../t~ ~ Lf 6' rJ, ~(.) t L. 6='otL ~ R b ;6 roo (ik-{e~ 9 () ~Vt /c{ ~ VA.) :ip: 111 ~ tD ~d"-[.t7P'L- .l!vV I(U)\(J."vOtlJ 0.f- ,-. " o o To: J t> . . Mr. Jim Brainard - Mayor, Carmel Indiana Mr. Kevin Kirby - Carmel City Council Mr. Ron Carter - Carmel City Council Ms. Luci Snyder - Carmel City Council Mr. Wayne Wilson - Carmel City Council Mr. Robert Battreall- Carmel City Council Mr. Norman Rundle - Carmel City Council Mr. John Kiven - Carmel City Council Members Carmel Clay Planning Commission Dear Members of the Carmel Clay Planning Commission The purpose of this letter is to express our concern and frustration regarding certain development activities in the area designated as the "Old Meridian Corridor" (OMC). We the undersigned, represent a majority ofthe residences that own homes on Guilford Avenue and/or Wildwood Drive. Our concern stems from what we see as a number of modifications to a comprehensive plan (the Old Meridian Corridor plan) that was passed with much debate and expense. The debate was proper and constructive and rightly included those of us that are neighbors to the area. The city hired a talented architect from Scheer and Scheer Inc. Cincinnati to assist in the formulation and presentation of the plan. The plan was passed a short time ago. Now as the first developments in the designated area are being planned and presented, this Commission is being asked to modify the plan. Some modifications are substantial some may not be considered substantial. However, in their entirety, they represent a morphing of the original plan to a final product that wi11likely look and feel different from the original vision. Specifically, one such modification is of great concern to us. During the OMC planning process, our neighborhoods expressed great concern about the future of the property bordered by Old Meridian on the west, Guilford Ave. on the east and Main street (131 st Street) on the south. Much to our surprise, we were asked to participate in the process. We truly appreciated having our concerns and input heard. After the initial plan was established, we asked the architect to visit our neighborhood. We wanted her to see first hand the proximity of our street to the OMC area and discuss how our residential street could coexist with the planned development. Ingress and egress on Guilford along with the type and look of neighboring development was our biggest concern. Our first meeting concluded with our group having a better understanding of the OMC goal and we scheduled second meeting. In both cases the architect visited us in our home during the evening hours. After the two visits she was convinced that Guilford access was an issue and that the traffic should be directed to the boulevard that was going to be upgraded to accommodate the commercial traffic. Eliminating a commercial use curb cut on Guilford also worked to enhance the integration of the Meadow Lark Park trail with the OMC area and the schools. She also understood the safety issue of adding a commercial use curb cut on Guilford. She made modifications to her plan, the OMC plan was submitted and was passed. r I / Q Q oi This was not the first time the issue was discussed. When the developers for the "Spine Institute" TWO building project was proposed, the developers showed a curb cut on Guilford. Our neighborhood raised the issue of safety and moving traffic to the road that would best handle the commercial traffic, that road being Old Meridian Street. In 1992 the city agreed with our assessment and the curb cut was eliminated. The committee should be reminded that the original "Spine Institute" proposal was for TWO buildings. This past spring Mayor Brainard was gracious enough to meet with us regarding the OMC project. We asked to see the Mayor because a number of us were considering substantial home modifications both in scope and expense. Mayor Brainard asked Mike Hollibaugh to attended. During our meeting Mayor Brainard reiterated the city's commitment the OMC project as it was passed. We left that meeting again feeling good about the plan and how our neighborhoods could coexist within the area. Now you are receiving some of the first proposals for development in the OMC area. One such proposal is the Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center, proposed as 13421 Old Meridian Street. This proposal is essentially for the second building ofthe site although it has been modified from the original plan of having the mirror image building ofthe original Spine Institute building. The developer, consistent with the OMC plan is NOT proposing a curb-cut on Guilford Ave. However, much to our disbelief, a Department of Community Services employee is asking for a curb cut. This is unbelievable to us. We can only conclude that there is some mistake or the Mr. Dobosiewicz is unaware of the history ofthis issue or does not take the careful planning ofthe original OMC very seriously. We were certainly hopeful that after the city of Carmel agreed with our position on two prior occasions and a reaffirmation of the city's commitment to the project by the Mayor, we could rest easily about the process of OMC development moving forward. Apparently that may be a mistake. Weare hopeful that this issue can be put to rest once and for all. Over the past 10 years our neighborhood has been inundated with development around our homes. On more than one occasion we have had to corne before this body (Carmel Clay Planning Commission) to report about promised landscaping plans that have been abandoned. On one occasion this body had to impose a bond requirement to hold the developer to the original landscaping plan. One only needs to take a quick lap around the parking lot of the Spine Institute building and see how those "nice grass landscape islands" are doing. We thank you for your time and consideration and hope for a quick resolution to this matter. Sincerely, The Residence of Wildwood Drive and Guilford Ave. Fax 'W u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Cannel, IN 46J32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 ,7 . To: n-cJkr/-4c"& From: Vovce Fax: 633- fL9? 0< Pages: Phone: 777- /0.3 Date: /1-7- 00\ Re:/Jrz,L)(J".,L/Yl(Z/}.,L ~r:::orr cc: f , o Urgent 0 For Review 0 P.Jease Comment 0 Please Reply / o Please Recycle 1/.3 -00< /j.l)L6 /.3~ _o~ 2. v( /33-00l. d?PlAI '/ Q u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SeIVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 40032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax To: ~kd h4c~ Fax: ~33 - 'fL9' 70l From: ~ WC'P~ / Pages: Phone: ~77- /~ Date: //-/-001 Re~~/;'1 ~e~ tZ.AJ~"/ke cc: , o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply Cl Please Recycle .C'P/l1e/ +.;/~ XJ'. ,t.~. C~. I I L_______. l~~~_~__. l=--- I L i I I"-'-~-'- ~ ~ - - u U \ '3~-o2..- 2. ~) Z,l~ ~~ }OpS/O"2.. ~ - ~~ s.~y. - _C-~~a . - _.__.-=_..~,.,.~...----",,<.,.--~--~ ----- .---., - - --g. De>_=. kl'-~'-7-----~ .--=------:... -------- ----i ._.~~~. m_N~ _lh\~<<n.~ t_~~_t>_--~.~-S'-~-~-~----1 __ i ___~~~___~.s~I.:rlo~", -__'_'_'__~_____"___j - .1':~~~~f' - ---------------.-l ~ - _g>~!lM!~~~....s-1 S.$_9L-___ '2. Ne.l...\l.c,.,~J\___.s'_IiE:..~~~ f~I'I!!1tIY_!l!E,_JS.~Wo!.. ~ ~-_~__.~..=__Lete._o..2.'r _-u&~L~_.s:I~ .~_~._e.-,,_N.~. _Q..'_l:'I.~<- ---j 3. ~~ ~ ~&f~_z-vV ~_~fi ~ ~:m~~~..u.a. - ~ ~b~ ~ ~-.i5s Qt.S1"l> fi"/~~ ~~ ~ ~; ~~~ .'. w~.JJfi;.: ~1C-.--JjLG~_~~~8$. tft::n. ~,a- . _ __ ___ __I_Jk,(~ ~ _~P.suc..._u~."P~-..m---~.M_'....llR: I ---~ ~--~a1.l:~.-<<1.~=__-----l .10-11-02; 9:46AM; ; 1 # 1/ 4 w u . ARCHITECTURE. ENGINEERING. INTIRIOR DESIGN AND A CONTINUUM OF 'ROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES TO Jon Dobosiewicz COMPANY City of Cannel FAX # 317-571-2426 PROJECT # 528002 DATE 11 October 2002 nME 9:00am FROM Becky Feigh # OF PAGES 4 (Including this page) NOTES: Enclosed is a copy of the Traffic Study performed per the City of Carmel request. If you have any questions please contact our office at 819-7878. RECF!\':r: OCT 11 2002 DOCS i=> This cover sheel and the materials enclDSed with this transmission are the private, cDnfidential property of the sender, and the materials are privileged communlcaUons intended solely for the receipt, use, benefit and Information of lhe Intended recipient. Any review, disclosure, copying, distribution, or taking of any other action In reliance on the contents oflhls transmission is strictly prohibited and may result in legal liability on your part. "you have received this transmission In enor, please notify us immediately at the above telephone number and arrange for retum ofthls transmission to us. FACSIMILE COVERSHEET 9365 COUNSELORS ROW, SUITE 300 INDIANAPOUS. IN J 46240-1479 317.819.7878 PH 1317.819.7288 FAX www.bsade8lgn.com 10-11-02; 9:46AM; u Traffic ; 1 # 2/ 4 u Engineering, Inc. 72 West Main Street, Suite 3 Danvllle, Indiana 46122 317-745-7126 telephone 317-745-7142 facsimile info@TrafflcEngineering.com USA Toll Free 888-252-9962 Transmittal r:" ~ ; i;" ... .,. TO: Becky Feigh, BSA FR: Chet Skwarcan, P.E. RE: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center DT: October 10, 2002 Traffic Engineering, Incorporated has completed its review of the proposed access along Guilford Avenue. This proposed access aligns with Wildwood Drive, creating a 4-legged intersection. The existing intersection was analyzed during AM and PM peak hour conditions and found to operate in a satisfactory manner. The portion of site traffic expected to utilize this access will not impact the operation of this exist- ing access. No mitigating improvements are recommended. .~..~.spec utf., ...1..,............................. .. . " . .",". - ": . .; ,: ....: . . . . : '. ". ,',", '" . ....... .' . ,": "",' ' . . . . . . . . . '. .... - ::.1,. :.:,." , C . ware ,'p'.. ", ~. 10-11-02; 9:46AM; ; 1 # 3/ 4 u u Traffic Summary In order to evaluate the potential impact ofthe proposed Guilford entrance, existing traffic data was collected at three existing intersections: 1. North Entrance along Old Meridian 2. South Entrance Along Old Meridian 3. Wildwood Entrance along Guilford (attached) All three entrances operate satisfactorily under existing conditions. With the potential addition of a third access along Guilford, site traffic was redistributed to evaluate this impact on the Wildwood/Guilford intersection. The site traffic expected to utilize this access will not have a significant impact at this intersection. The Wildwood! Guilford intersection will continue to operate in a satisfactory manner.N 10-11-02; 9:46AM; u Existing Peak Hour Traffie Volumes at Guilford and Wildwood Drive ; 1 # 4/ 4 u Existing traffic volumesfor Wildwood Drive are illustrated below. Based on site traffic volumes using the present north and south entrances, the portion of site traffic expected to utilize this third access is expected to be minimal (i.e. less than the peak hour volumes currently utilizing Wildwood Drive). Wildwood at Guilford AM Peak Hour (7:10.8:10 AM) During the AM peak hour, 8 vehicles exited and 3 entered Wildwood Dlive Wildwood at Guilford PM Peak Hour (4:50-5:50 PM) During the PM peak hour, 5 vehicles exited and 7 entered Wildwood Drive ~ 'W Q CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4E032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax To: 4kd r/~~ Fax: 633 - fL9'7 D? Phone: C?'7 7 -/~ct3 Re~~d/1)d/)1 ~-r- Frum. ~y Ce Pages: 9' Date: /0-/0 -6'6( ce: o Urgent 0 Far- Review 0 Please Comment CJ Please Reply o Please Recycle IJoc.t--dl-dJ. /30<-00/ -<W /~..7- o~ zw' t'drme/ A~~.I/aftr~,J q( &-~ '-) Fax .w o CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Services One Civic SC{uare Carmel, IN 4&X32 (317) 571.2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 .de~ ~d tf/tp'- 7cRJ?J' To: Fax: Phone: ReJ)~rlPld/]1 ~~. Frum: ~y Cot Pages: 9 Date: /0-/0 -d~ CC: o Urgent 0 Far Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle .{JncJ...r? I- #tJ. // .3 -- 0 Q? A-2JL:s dzn1Je/ 4-m-l,.//4,'47 5~ V e~ ,'~ , ' \.".._/ -~.. ,> , ER~lON AND SEDIMENT CONT L PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org PROJECT NAME: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center \ J r -0 o~ /(/JJ BSA Design \ '7 /2; 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center 13421 Old Meridian Street Carmel, IN 46032 REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 10/10/02 Acreage: 9 ac LOCATION: South of the intersection of Old Meridian and Guilford Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 25 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP:, Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50 The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewed for local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional iriformation, including design calculations may be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: X Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. X Refer to the comments section for additional information. Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be a flexible document, with provisions to modifY or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4 / 97 /... ,~',- EOION AND SEDIMENT CONT~ PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center Page 2 of2 Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents. Comments: Please show a horseshoe shaped rock dam at the detention outlet that extends from bank to bank in front of the outlet. Provide an elevation for its height. Your note for item 4D specify the contractor submitting the project phasing plan indicating scope of earthwork to the Architect. In addition, please require the phasing plan to be submitted to the Soil and Water Conservation District for approval of the construction sequence. You may leave the two sediment pits on the plans but I don't see how they will work. Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor File *" ,::Of C4i,d ". ,,,..J. ....----...:...TA _ .c. . <...' / ','7..<\' "U/u' '-.~( : "/ t;t ~\ .... * :c =<= * ..~ \c;: sf ::' ::'; \ /~ .~:. c:_'~~{;:ON Cb.~Q U 0 City of Carmel " .. DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING October 9, 2002 ~ $I ~ O~ECEIVED fll 10,. 00 DtJcs Ms. Becky R. Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, S fudianapolis, IN 46240-38 Center-Project Review #1 Dear Ms. Feigh: We apologize for the delay in responding to you. We have reviewed the drawings submitted for this project and offer the following comments: GENERAL INFORMATION 4. The project site is located within current City of Cannel Corporate Limits. Jurisdictions: . Street and Right of Way - City of Cannel. . Water, Sanitary Sewer, Storm Sewer - City of Cannel. Board of Public Works and Safety Approval Requirements: . Water and Sanitary Sewer Availability. . Right of Way Dedication. I am enclosing dedication documents approved by the City of Carmel. Please use these for the formal dedication of the additional right of way for Old Meridian. These documents may be sent electronically if you desire. . Commercial Curb Cut. Please provide an exhibit that shows the location of the curb cut and acell/decellanes if applicable; appropriate dimensions including drive width, overall width at the street, aceWdecel dimensions, radii, etc.; and location of existing opposing curb cuts, if applicable. The exhibit should be 8 Y2 x II or of a size that can be reduced to 8 Y2 x 11 such as 8 Y2 x 14 or II x 17. Since you are rebuilding the south entrance, I believe BPWS re-approval will be required. . Temporary Construction Entrance. Same requirements as for the Commercial Curb Cut (if applicable). . Consent to Encroach Agreements for any permanent improvement to be installed within dedicated right of way and/or dedicated easements. If an irrigation system is planned for this project, additional Water and Sewer Availability approval will be required from the Board. I am enclosing a schedule for Board of Public Works and Safety meeting dates and agenda deadlines for your use. Please use the Engineering Department deadlines for submissions to the Board. Any submission to the Board requires prior final approval by the Carmel CWy PIon Commission tu,d/or the Board of Zoning Appeals tuld completion of review by the Technical Advisory Conunittee. AU written requests to be placed on the Board's agenda must incbule the appropriate Docket Numbers tutd the date (or dates) of approval by the PIon Commission tuld/or BZA. Water and Sanitary Availability (acreage) and Connection Fees: . It is our assumption that Availability (acreage) Fees were paid for the entire site when the Spine fustitute was constructed. Our records indicate that Availability (acreage) Fees were paid on 8.1 acres on June 10, 1992. Therefore, there would be no additional Availability Fees calculated for this development. . Connection Fees are based upon the average user factor tables from Section 9-35 (water) and 9-200 (sanitary) of our Utility Ordinance. It is our understanding that the Connection Fees have been discussed with John Duffy, Director Cannel Utilities. The following summarizes the Connection Fee calculation from our Utility Director from a memo to Bob Whitacre dated March 29, 2002: 18 Examining/Surgery Rooms @ .60 EDUslroom = 5,000 sq. ft. Office @ 0.5 EDUsl1000 sq. ft. = Total Water Connection Fee - 13.3 EDUs @ $I,310/EDU = Sanitary Sewer Connection Fee - 13.3 EDUs @ $795/EDU = Total Connection Fees 10.8 EDUs 2.5 EDUs 13.3 EDUs $17,423.00 $10.574.00 $27,997.00 1. 2. 3. ._~" John Duffy n:ls approved these Connection Fees for the Cannel Ambul:ltory Center. ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2441 .; '> . v o Ms. Becky F eigh October 9, 2002 Page 2 5. TAC ReviewlDrawings submitted for approval: We request that all comments and comment letters genemted by this office be answered in writing and be accompanied by a drawing reflecting requested revisions. Final drawings will not be approved for construction until all issues have been resolved. All Carmel Utility issues must also re resolved. The design engineer must certify all drawings submitted for final approval. This office will require five-sets of approved drawings after all issues have been resolved The drawings will be stamped approved and signed by both the City Engineer and Director Carmel Utilities. The Developer/Owner will receive one-set which is to be maintained on the construction site at all times. Carmel Utilities will receive two-sets. Our Public Works Inspector will receive one-set and one-set will be maintained in the Department of Engineering. If more than five-sets are requested to be approved, the additional sets must be submitted with the five required sets. 6. Please be advised that any installation of signs, walls, irrigation systems, etc. within dedicated right of way and/or dedicated easements will require a Consent to Encroach Agreement between the OwnerlDeveloper and the City of Carmel. This Agreement requires Board of Public Works and Safety approval. 7. Carmel Utilities does not subscribe to "Holey Moley" and should be contacted directly for all water main and sanitary sewer main locations. 8. Carmel Utilities will provide a sepamte review of this project for water and sanitary sewer issues. 9. I am including copies of the following with this correspondence: . Commercial Project Approval Procedures. . Permit Data, Contacts, etc. . Commercial Permitting Procedures. I will send a copy of our Residential Subdivision and Commercial Irrigation System Requirements upon request. BONDING REQUIREMENTS 10. Upon initial review, it appears the following bonding requirements will apply to this project: Performance Guarantees Performance Guarantees will not be required for this project. Right of Way Permit and Bonding Requirements Any work in dedicated right of way will require a Right of Way Permit and a License and Permit Bond. The bond amount will be determined by the number of instances of work in the right of way (curb cut, storm sewer work, etc.) @ $2,000.00 per instance. It appears that all right of way work involves the existing south entrance. Based upon the scope of work at this site (demolition, repaving, storm pipe, gas line), we request that a $8,000.00 bond be posted for this Permit work. Permit forms are available from this office. There is no charge for the permit. PROJECT COMMENTS \ RoadslRWlPavement 11. Is one of the two entrances off of Old Meridian planned to be the "main" entrance? If so, we would ask that to the extent they can be worked in with the Old Meridian Road Plans, accelemtionldeceleration lanes be added. 12. On Sheet CIOO, a "proposed 40 foot r.o.w." is indicated on Old Meridian. Should be 60 feet. 13. All proposed drives should align with existing or proposed drives within the St. Vincent's Master Plan. Indicate on site plan (in light type) location of existing drive. Label all others as existing or new (relocated) drive. 14. Indicate or note where new utilities going in will require pavement cuts (in dedicated streets if applicable). On Sheet C200, it appears that an open cut across Guilford for the gas line is planned. All open pavement cuts in dedicated right of way require prior Board of Public Works and Safety approval. We will require the contractor to mill and resurface the cut in an acceptable manner and in a total area as recommended by this office and approved by the Board of Public Works and Safety. 15. Sheet C300- The new right of way asphalt should extend all the way to the new, proposed 60-foot half right of way line. 16. Sheet C300 - The 40-foot half right of way of Guilford is labeled as proposed. Has this right of way already been dedicated? If so, do you have access to the original dedication documents? 17. Show proposed roundabout, proposed right of way take for Old Meridian project (@ corner Guilford) and the proposed Old Meridian layout (label as Proposed Old Meridian Layout-by City) including median cuts and proposed St. Vincent's entrances on the west side. Indicate the proposed lines by lighter or dashed line type. Our office can assist you in obtaining the designs for that project, as prepared by Butler Fairman Seufert. hl addition, show. 18. Sheet C600 - The City of Carmel R.O.W. Asphalt Detail must match the pavement section to be utilized on the Old Meridian project, a copy of which is enclosed with this correspondence. 19. Please include a ''Maintenance of Tmffic Plan" for work on Old Meridian (at a minimum, we need signage indicating the road construction at the edge of road). . . . o o Ms. Becky F eigh October 9, 2002 Page 3 20. It appears that a portion of the existing sidewalk along Guilford is constructed outside of the right of way. This "sliver" between the detention pond and Guilford may eventually need to be reconstructed to be within the right-of-way, or additional right-of-way dedicated to include it. For the purposes of this review, no changes are required to be made at this time. 21. The Alternative Transportation Plan (A TP) indicates 10-foot asphalt paths are required along this portion of Old Meridian. Drainae:e: 22. Sheet C200 - Indicate storm pipe sizes, material, slope, inverts and top of casting. Indicate pipe material on water and sanitary lines. 23. It is our assumption that the storm sewer system will be private. 24. Please show on at least one drawing, the location of the new versus the old parking lot limits. This will help to understand the changes to the site and how it impacts the drainage calculations. 25. Within the drainage calculations, you indicate that the predeveloped conditions are residential and open field. This would not be the correct way to label the initial conditions. Pre-developed conditions would be considered the existing, prior to this prooosed development, not prior to all development. Therefore, the initial conditions should indicate the buildings and parking lot as currently found on the site. Parameters used in the drainage calculations should reflect these conditions. 26. Clarify both pond outlet structures on Detail Sheet C60l. . Shows conflicting size outlet pipes. . Conflicting locations of orifice opening on side and front views. . Conflicting Elevations. 27. Please clarify the information for Structure 8 outlet pipe from the dry pond) on all sheets: . Is it a 12" outlet pipe with 8 " orifice inside pipe? . Does it also have a 6" orifice opening in structure? . What is the elevation of the 6" orifice, 838.00 or 840.00? 28. The drainage report is confusing in the mentioning of the maximwn stage of both ponds. It indicates that there is a 2" depth above the spillway for the dry pond and a 6" depth above the spillway for the wet basin for a 100 year stonn, yet it mentions the maximwn stage for the 100 year elevation to be at lest 1 foot below the emergency spillway elevation. Is this a typo in the report? Why have an open grate elevation for the outlet structure (of the dry pond) if the spillway plus the 2" is still below this? Is it assumed this grate elevation will be reached? 29. Please show the outlet pipe with all information (size, elevations, etc.) from the existing detention basin. 30. Is any swale, underdrain or other created flowline between the inlet pipe and th~ outlet structure within the dry detention basin planned? 31. Why is the existing control structure from the wet basin being reduced in size from 60" to 48"? 32. Please provide a summary of the parameters of the before and after conditions, i.e. acreage existing, curve nwnber, time of concentration that are used in the calculations. For example, Existing: Area (Basins, A, B, etc.)= ? Proposed: Area (Basin A, B, etc) Weighted Curve Nwnber = Weighted Curve Number- Tc= Tc= ", Q2, QlO, QlOO Q2, QlO, QlOO 33. Do not resend the printout of the hydrographs. With the above summary, we would like a copy of the basic drainage basin map, showing current basinslland cover versus proposed basins, storm sewerslland cover. Please share these comments with all persons to be associated with this project including the OwnerlDeveloper, Contractors, etc. The above comments are based upon the Engineering Department's initial review. Please provide our office with a follow up letter and revised plans, indicating all revisions. Second and subsequent reviews will focus only on revised items. It is critical that our office be made aware of all modifications made on the plans being re-submitted, particularly if any such changes are considered "new" or fall outside of our initial review. " o . . Ms. Becky Feigh October 9, 2002 Page 4 If you have questions, please contact Kate Weese, Mike McBride or me at 571-2441. Sjg:JlL Dick Hill, Assistant Director Department of Engineering Enclosures cc: M. Kate Weese, City Engineer (w/o encl.) Mike McBride, Assistant City Engineer (w/o encl.) Jon Dobosiewicz, Department of CommunitY Services (w/o encl.) Laurence Lillig, Department of Community Services (w/o encl.) John Duffy, Carmel Utilities (w/o encl.) S:\PROJREV02\CARAMBSURGREVISED (,) ~ \ .,.-- ( - 1<.3 -./.?p(' ,f..i)t:.:S 1"" '" Ul... .. / /.. U u City of Carmel DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES September 26, 2002 Becky Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240-3809 RE: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery Center Landscape and Tree Preservation Plans Dear Becky: I have received the revised plans for the Surgery Center and my comments are as follows: 1. On the Site Demolition Plan there is a "limit of construction" line but no indication of where tree protection fencing will be placed. On the south perimeter it appears that the construction will go to the parcel's edge and into the tree line. Tree protection fencing needs to be placed outside the tree line on the south property line to prevent injury and death to the adjacent trees. The location of perimeter tree protection fencing shall be shown on the plan. On individual trees to be protected, a minimum diameter from the trunk should be specified (or actual 'dripline' distance listed) on the plan for tree protection fencing, or included as a separate document. 2. TREE PROTECTION AND TRIMMING PROCEDURES AND RESPONSIBILITES are referenced in the first note. These need to be on the plans, or in a separate written document, and submitted to this office. 3. There are no planting notes or specifications on the plans. 4. Total number of plants for each species is to be included in the plant schedule. 5. Thornless Cockspur hawthorn is not recommended because of disease and insect pest pressures in this area. An alternative should be chosen. A large maturing shade tree would do well in this location (large soil volumes for roots), species such as london plane tree, oak species (not pin oak), tulip tree, black gum or ginko are acceptable. 6. Some ofthe relocated trees on the southeast comer appear to be located on the plan within the detention pond. This should be corrected. The landscape plan should also show the topographical lines for the elevations of the detention pond including the safety ledge, and if the area is dry detention or will hold water ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 i '- Q u /l continually. If the pond will hold water continually, the perimeter should be landscaped. 7. Relocated trees that die will have to be replaced as part of ADLS commitments. 8. On the east perimeter there is a section of buffering landscaping that it appears from the plan, is being removed during construction and not being replaced. This section needs to be replanted with plant material similar to the original upon completion of the construction project. 9. Tree planting detail 01: the note which says "GRADE AT WHICH TREE GREW AT NURSERY" shall be changed to read "PLANT ROOT FLARE AT GRADE LEVEL". The note on removing the burlap shall match the note in Detail 02 which reads "REMOVE UPPER 1/3 OF BURLAP AND REMOVE ANY BINDINGS FROM THE STEM." A note needs to be added that states "WIRE, HOSE, AND WRAPPINGS ARE TO BE REMOVED AFTER ONE YEAR." Please reply to these comments in writing and by amended plan. Contact me at 571- 2478 ifthere are any questions. CC: Laurence Lillig, DOCS Jon Dobosiewicz, DOCS . -;: 1. PROJECT NAME: ( ER~ON AND SEDIMENT CONT L PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org /3 ..:{-oO(.e- wi Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center /3,3/ CJ;(Z h/ ..'- SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center 13421 Old Meridian Street Carmel, IN 46032 BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 9/24/02 Acreage: 9 ac LOCA TION: South of the intersection of Old Meridian and Guilford Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 25 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50 The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewedfor the adequacy of the engineering design. All practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Refer to the comments section for additional information. X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 327IAC 15-5 (Rule 5): deficiencies are noted in the checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted: Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be ajlexible document, with provisions to modifY or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4 /97 .: ., Carmel AmbulatoUurgery and Endoscopy Center Q PROJECT: Page 2 of3 ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS? (All Plans Must Include Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow) (Items that are Not Applicable to this Project are designated by NA) Yes No PROJECT INFORMATION x lA Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county) X IB Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project x lC Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc. x ID Lot and/or Building Locations x IE Landuse of Adjacent Areas (Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Ac(jacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property Lines) Yes No TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES x 2A Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate) X 2B Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site x 2C 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None) X 2D Soils Information (If hydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer to investigate the existence of wetlands and to obtain permits from the appropriate government agencies.) X 2E Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns x 2F Locations of Specific Points Where Storm water Discharge Will Leave the Site x 2G Identify All Receiving Waters (If Discharge is to a Separate Municipal Storm Sewer, Identify the Name of the Municipal Operator and the Ultimate Receiving Water) X 2H Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None) X 21 Location of Stormwater System (Include Culverts, Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swales) Yes No LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES x 3A Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i.e., Construction Limits] (Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated) X 3B Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if None) Yes No x 4A x 4B x 4C x 4D x 4E x 4F x 4G x 4H x 41 N/A 4J 'X 4K EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disturbing Activities) Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Temporary Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates) Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Stormwater Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications) Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates) Revised 4 / 97 J . ERl>ION AND SEDIMENT CONTICL PLAN 'llllII" TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS .' PROJECT: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center Page 3 of 3 Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents. Comments: 4A. The instructions for the demolition plan are direct and site specific. The same type of instruction is needed for the erosion control sequence. Include in the sequence only those practices that will be used on this site. 48. The maintenance instructions for the silt pit are excellent. Additional information should be added to silt fence and catch basin details. The "Indiana Handbook for Erosion and Sediment Control in Urbanizing Areas" has maintenance criteria for each practice. I will send the appropriate pages if you don't have a copy of the manual. 4C. The proposed sediment basin could be the primary sediment basin for the project during construction. The basin needs to be identified in the construction sequence and would need to have a suitable outlet. A slotted riser makes a good outlet for a dry basin. A temporary pipe could be run from the basin to the existing catch basin to the north. The two silt pits are not needed if the larger basin is installed early in the construction process. 4D. Seeding needs to be spelled out in the construction sequence. If this project is started this fall, typically the basin will be seeded and protected with EC blankets. Other disturbed areas will not be seeded until after the building is completed and the plantings installed next summer. Temporary seeding, crimped straw, mulch or other ground covers are required to protect all disturbed areas prior to bad weather or inactivity. Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor File .1 I I I I I I I I .1 I I i I ! i i II 11 II ; II I ! ON-SITE EV ALUATIUN .1lUK .l!.KV~lVl.'C aJ.'l.lJ "~.lJ.lJ.Vu..l"'.I. \.,.Vl... .I..I.'\.V.LI Hamr )n County Soil and Water Conserv~/"l1 District "T108 South 9th Street, Noblesville, IN~60 . Telephone: 317-773-2181 Fax: 317-776-1101 i "1 I Date: I 9!t9/oZ -I ~. projecf.Name: Sr. 1/,N(!~JJr CA~HEL- presenf at Site: John South, HamUto.n Co. SWCD, This r~port was Provided To: "iI~ Cf4. TTEIJ DEN :reFF SnALL.. i Sr. V'NCEtJr CAR.ttI!.L 1Ui>. khtfIT-OJIIISTe. i '3Sl>O I/. HEf!.D.AIJ Sr. 110.., BLI~D.s~U_ P.AeICW4-t' t CJJ2.HEL,.::r..., ..,I.t>~t:. .:r,..,Ot,\IIQJlol.tS, 'IN TypeQFEVALUATION: ""V>8 o *itiaJ ~ Routine 0 Follow-up 0 Complaint This eyaluation is intended to assess the level of compliance with 327 lAC 15-5 (Rule 5). It is also intended to identify areas where! addi~~al measures may be required to control erosion and sedimentation. All practices recommended in this report should be i eValuurd as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with stroc,tura1 practices designed by a qualified e~gineer. i All eJi sion and sediment control measures shaH meet the desi~ criteria, standards, and specificatiO~S outlined in the i "Indi na Handbook for Erosion Control in Developing Areas" or similar guidance documents. i ~~ . .:! Curr t Site Information: RUII.. 0,,1& eON3rp,)c. .,16# CDlIrINIJ~. '. : ! I i .mt=-v-Q~ f::::~ J: I J,. E.. I I I -, I i I r I I i ! The Following Items Have Been Evaluated and Assigned a Designation of: S = Satisfactory M = Marginal U = Unsatisfactory NA = Not Applicable Cons truction Site Management for Erosion and Sediment Control i M m NA (1) Disturbed areas have been adequately protected through seeding or oth.er appropriate erosion and sediment control measures. . ~ M. @ NA (2) Appropriate perimeter sediment control measures have been implemented. . @> M U NA (3) Conveyance channels have been stabilized or protected with appropriate sediment .~ntrol measures. ~ @ U NA (4) Erosion & sediment control measures are installed properly. ~ M U NA (5) Storm drain inlets have been adequately protected. ' $ M U NA (6) Outlets have been adequately stabilized. :!. @ U NA (7) Existing erosion & sediment control measures are being maintained. I ~ M U NA (8) Public & private roadways are being'kept clear of accumulated sediment or tacked soil. ' r M U <m::> (9) Erosion & sediment control measurC$ have been installed and maintained on: individual building sitesJ I Sta~ of Sediment Retention On-Site qJ Site conditions present a high potential for off-site sedimentation. qJ There is evidence of off site sedimentatipn. qJ Description provided: ~ F ease Refer to the Comments Section of this Report eom oiled By: Definitions . Sa~factory: The item is currently in compliance with the rule Marpnal: A concern has been identified; corrective action is strongly recommended to remain in compliance Unsatisfactory: A violation has been identified and the site is not in compliance; corrective action is required Not ~pplicable: Does not apply at this stage of construction I Revised 4/98! .' I I I i i I '/ I ! 0 0 ., I 0 ! 0 I I I 0 i ! 0 u o .~ ; ! ON-SITE EV ALVA TION FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL COMMENTS I PRO*CT NAME: 51: VII'JC~NT H/ls/>rrAl- The it ms checked below must be cor~ected prior to K I stall an appropriate s iment control practice be ~ eplacelRepair silt fence and/or straw bale barriers. ;ntrench silt fence (6-8 in.) and/or straw bale barriers (4 -6 in.) and stake straw bales. emove .accumulated sediment from: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 behind silt fence/straw bales, 0 around storm drain inlet roteetion devices, 0 streets and gutters (Do not flush with ~ater) . Temporary seed, fertilize, and/or mulch: S~/~ S 1"6lK PIJ.l!:. . o o o ~ )l ennanent seed, fertilize, and mulch areas that are at final fade: t:fjN$r~ot!.TJIJIJ a.1ZE'A IN JI.A/D A.J.IJJ" OS 3/ ~} I I frotect storm drain inlets: 0 curb inlets, 0 drop inlets feshape and stabilize sideslopes of: 0 sediment trapslbasins, 0 detention/retention basins I fnstall/Maintain construction entrance(s): fteshape and stabilize conveyance channels: i ' Place greater emphasis on erosion and sediment control on building sites; contractors. subcontractot,s, material vendors, and' bthers should be made aware of erosion and sediment control requirements. Appropriate perimeter ,sediment controls e.g. silt fence) and stable construction entrances shall be utilized on all sites. Sediment tracked intQ the street shall be emoved (do not flush with water) at the end of each work day. Other Requirements: ; i r I I I I I I FO~ questions regarding this report conta.t: John South .W o CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Cannel, IN 40032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (31 T) 571-2426 Fax ~. To: .' ~~/.6 Fax: '//7'- 7cX eft From: 9r-- y '7-0--CJ~ Pages: Phone: Date: Re: y:2 y:?~ cc: o Urgent 0 For Review 0 P.lease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle TO 'J /{5c\U'2Il0 a .. . /.'y ~.~<:\ t-/ R\JJ-~(~~? t.~\ ARCHmCTUR! . IHGIH!!RING . IHTlRIOR DESIGN i :::, {'IrO 'tL 1.\ ,. :~=.1 AND A CONTINUUM OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES \-_\ \)~,\ p,:,lj Dept. of Community Seprices U\)~S /-::DATE 12 Sept. 2002 One Civic Square \(/\:, /~::j y' ,>--/<" d Carmel, Indiana '<:>>_ ~/h\ 'y/ '~I r;-C;T\ \ '0/ ---~~i--'_.-L-- ATTENTION Jon Dobosiewicz PROJECT Carmel Ambulatory Surgery Center Carmel, Indiana COPIES DOCUMENT NO. DOCUMENT DATE DESCRIPTION ACTION CODE 20 9/17/02 Plan Commission Booklets B . REMARKS A. Action indicated on item transmitted B. For your information C. For your signature & retum to this office D. Fumish as submitted E. Fumish as corrected - resubmittal required F. Fumish as corrected - no resubmittal required G. Revise and resubmit H. For your approval I. Remarks FROM Becky Feigh COPIES TO file PROJECT NO. 528002 TRANSMITTAL LETTER 9365 COUNSELORS ROW, SUITE 300 INDIANAPOLIS, IN / 46240-1479 317.819.7878 PH / 317.819.7288 FAX www.bsadesign.com Document2 o II -0 CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic SC(Lr.lre Carmel, IN 40032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax To: ff'akL/ m,fid P' / Fax: O'/? -?;;?rl' . - From: ~$I'ce I Pages: Phone: Date: 9-9-1:)0( Re:tJ~ ()//J~/~ti?/) d~ CC: V o Urgent 0 For Review 0 PIease Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle (1tt/'m~/ "fh,1.t0/ano/ JU(1. ~.,1,. Cr:-. J)ockl- 4,. //3-Ct:R/f~ t-l '.J To: .eb6 d-13 Fax: b3..3 -7L97;).. Phone: 9~ 7- / ~...:a3 Re: ~#/?]ct' I 'y.9~q~ .5):7". C'/r" Fax Q o Ii ~/f$ ~ 6> ~ ''1~'),- ....... One Civi Carmel, i (317) 57 Fax: (311 From: ~ yC(?' , q tp-3-Ct. Pages: Date: cc: o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle ", "-..) W: U City of Carmel DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES August 1, 2002 Ms. Becky Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors RoW; Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 RE: Carmel Physicians Surgery Center Dear Ms. Feigh, In accordance with the provisions set forth in the Ordinance Z-389-02, which is being considered by the Carmel City Council for adoption, the Department has reviewed your request to allow an increased building footprint and parking provision for the proposed Carmel Physicians Surgery Center. Following is a response to each request: Building Footprint The building footprint of 32,903 square feet is approved with the condition that the entire fa<;ade facing Old Meridian Street will be two stories. Parking Plan The proposed amount of parking (383 spaces) is approved. The Department reserves the right to further review the need to provide access to Guilford Road, the alignment of the relocated drive cut onto Old Meridian Street, and alternative parking lot designs as part of the Architectural Design, Landscaping, Lighting and Signage approval (ADLS). In addition to these comments, it has come to our attention that there are several individual parcels involved in this site. To avoid the need for variances regarding side yard setbacks, the parcels must be combined into a single parcel. Any parcel less than five acres in area would require a subdivision plat. If you should have any questions regarding these comments, do not hesitate to contact me by phone at (317) 571.2417 or email atklawrence@ci.carmeLin.us. ~~ Kelli Lawrence Long Range Planner CC: Mike Hollibaugh, Director Jon Dobosiewicz, Planning Administrator ONE CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571-2417 AUG 22 '132 12: 30PM P.1/1 o Xel/to1l C. 'Weird, SlJr/lf'yor (NiDIIl' (J%7) 7ib-~4~1.1j 'ral' (.Pi) ;"i'1i-~6.28 SI/iff 1.3~ On,1 :Hamiltlllr C;IlI/IIIy S'llfUlt' :'~Dblrslllll", Inditllla 4r>"bO-:l.l30 /<;.~--...., /'\ V..:--'__l- _1_,<,,-( ,r;~ /~t,;>~v '.j,,~,'f ~ I'",,? . "'y), /~--:' ~ ,\<~ f\ \\/;\ {' , ~~v ~\, i~.:\ o.<v\J ~'\ \'t, [_j '\' (\ "C'S I;;: I \ ~~$::> f'\'V fl,,-l,)!, \, \" <'\.'\) ;----1 /~\ v 1"1 \")'>--.h '," /'-':~ --./~ ,,- ""-, I / /';'~-r..,-;'-:- ,/ ~",,~-i-=~~J3 August 22, 2002 BSA Design Attn: Becky Feigh 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 VIA FACSIMILE: 317..819-7288 Re: Carmel Ambulatory Sw'gery Center and Endo Center (13421 Old Meridian Street) 1/ 3-C/~ )J)~ Dear Ms. PelSh: We have reviewed tile site construction plans submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's office on August 7, 2002. We have the following comments: 1. This site is located within the Cannel city llmits. 2. The outlet Is not a county regulated drain watershed, therefore, no pennits 8l'e required from this office. 3. Thl! office refers you to the city ofCarmet Engineer for drainage requirements. 4. Please provide this offir,e with a copy of the drainage calculations. S, As noted by Steve Cash at yesterday's TAC meeting. the pond outlet pipe is ntissing. Should you have any que$tions please contact me at 776-849S, Thank you. c;r;crelY, p~1(l;j lenn~ Plan Reviewer Cc: City ot'Carmel-Engineer City ofCarmeJ-Departtnent of Coltlmunity Services Hamilton County Department of Soli Conservation Services Hamilton County Highway Department Q o City of Carmel Fire Department Headquarters 2 CIVIC SQUARE CARMEL, INDIANA 46032 317/571#2600 August21,2002 Jon Dobosiewizc, Department of Community Services City of Carmel 1 Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Dear Jon, After our conversation regarding the Carmel Ambulatory Surgery Center, I drove by the project location off Guilford Road north of West Main Street. At the southeast corner of the Spine Institutes parking lot there would be sufficient area that could be used as an access point of Guilford Road. A few trees might have to be removed or relocated and a few parking spaces might be lost, but an entrance at this point would save time in our responding to the buildings. It would be the request of our office, if allowed by the County Highway Department or City Engineer, that an access road be constructed off Guilford Road. With the impending improvements to Old Meridian Street, which will tie up traffic, this would seem the time to address this alternate access to the Spine Institute and the proposed Ambulatory Surgery Center. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this matter, please contact our office. Res ectfully, ary A. oyt, ~ Carmel Fire Prevention Bureau Cc: Becky Feigh, BSA Design file (2) Fire Prevention Saves Lives and Property , I u o 8/Y/C2- 1;12..0 .$ - "'" &....4 c:.e , ~ ; ~o ~l~ o. 4 f\1\ (>- W" 'ftlIl. I ~ 1,... .. ~ ERO ON AND SEDIMENT CONTR L PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW AND COMMENT Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District 1108 South 9th Street, Noblesville IN 46060 Ph- 317-773-1432 or Email at john-south@iaswcd.org PROJECT NAME: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center //3-00? /l..tJL0 SUBMITTED BY: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center 13421 Old Meridian Street Carmel, IN 46032 BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240 REVIEWED BY: John B. South P.E. Certified Professional in Erosion and Sediment Control PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURE: Plan Review Date: 8/20/02 Acreage: 9 ac LOCATION: South of the intersection of Old Meridian and Guilford Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Sec. 25 TOWNSHIP: 18N RANGE: 3E CIVIL TOWNSHIP: Clay SOIL SURVEY MAP SHEET: 50 The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the erosion and sediment control plan for the project. The erosion and sediment control plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All practices included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility by a qualified individual with structural practices designed by a qualified engineer. The plan has not been reviewedfor local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information, including design calculations may be requested to further evaluate the erosion and sediment control plan. The erosion and sediment control plan has been reviewed and it has been determined that the plan: Satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5). Notification will be forwarded to the Indiana Department of Environmental Management. Refer to the comments section for additional information. X Does not satisfy the minimum requirements and intent of 3271AC 15-5 (Rule 5); deficiencies are noted in the checklist and in the comments section. Deficiencies constitute potential violations of the rule and must be adequately addressed for compliance. The information necessary to satisfy the deficiencies must be submitted: Proper implementation of the erosion and sediment control plan and inspections of the construction site by the developer or a representative are necessary to minimize off-site sedimentation. The developer should be aware that unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may effect the performance of a practice or the erosion and sediment control plan. The plan must be a flexible document, with provisions to modifY or substitute practices as necessary. Revised 4 / 97 PROJECT: Carmel Ambulato~rgery and Endoscopy Center Q i" Page 2 of3 Yes No x lA x IB x lC x ID x IE Yes No x 2A x 2B x 2C x 2D x 2E x 2F x 2G x 2H x-see comment 21 Yes No x 3A x 3B Yes No x 4A x 4B x 4C x 4D x 4E x 4F x 4G x 4H x 41 N/A x 4K ARE THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS? (All Plans Must Include Appropriate Legends, Scales, and North Arrow) (Items that are Not Applicable to this Project are designated by NA) PROJECT INFORMATION Project Location Map (Show project in relation to other areas of the county) Narrative Describing the Nature and Purpose of the Project Location of Planned and/or Existing Roads, Utilities, Structures, Highways, etc. Lot and/or Building Locations Landuse of Adjacent Areas (Show the Entire Upstream Watershed and Adjacent Areas Within 500 Feet of the Property Lines) TOPOGRAPHIC, DRAINAGE, AND GENERAL SITE FEATURES Existing Vegetation (Identify and Delineate) Location and Name of All Wetlands, Lakes and Water Courses On and Adjacent to the Site 100 Year Floodplains, Floodway Fringes, and Floodways (Note if None) Soils Information (Ifhydric soils are present, it is the responsibility of the owner/developer to investigate the existence of wetlands and to obtain permits from the appropriate government agencies.) Existing and Planned Contours at an Interval Appropriate to Indicate Drainage Patterns Locations of Specific Points Where Storm water Discharge Will Leave the Site Identify All Receiving Waters ( If Discharge is to a Separate Municipal Storm Sewer, Identify the Name of the Municipal Operator and the Ultimate Receiving Water) Potential Areas Where Storm water May Enter Groundwater (Note if None) Location of Storm water System (Include Culverts. Storm Sewers, Channels, and Swales) LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES Location and Approximate Dimensions of All Disturbed Areas [i.e., Construction Limits] (Areas Where Vegetative Cover Will Be Preserved Should be Clearly Designated) Soil Stockpiles and or Borrow Areas (Show Locations or Note if None) EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES Sequence of When Each Measure Will Be Implemented (Relative to Earth Disturbing Activities) Monitoring and Maintenance Guidelines for Each Measure Perimeter Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Temporary Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates) Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Permanent Erosion and Sediment Control Measures (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Storm Drain Inlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Storm water Outlet Protection (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) Stable Construction Entrance (Location, Construction Detail, Dimensions, and Specifications) 4J Erosion and Sediment Control on Individual Building Lots (Specifications) Permanent Seeding (Specifications; Including Seed Mix, Fertilizer, Lime, and Mulch Rates) Revised 4 / 97 . ER~ON AND SEDIMENT CONTR'2 PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMENTS PROJECT: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center Page 3 of 3 Note: All erosion and sediment control measures shown on the plans and referenced in this review must meet the design criteria, standards, and specifications outlined in the "Indiana Handbookfor Erosion Control in Developing Areas" from the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents. Please address the items marked "no" on page two. Additional Comments: . The outlet for the detention basin needs to be shown. Appropriate inlet protection will be needed. . Label the construction limits line. . All disturbed areas will need to be temporarily seeded after the rough grading is completed. Please include this in the construction sequence. . A unique construction sequence is needed for the project. . Show location of inlet protection. . Maintenance specifications are needed for each practice. Cc: Carmel DOCS Ha. Co. Surveyor File u o C~I\JrJtllel August 12, 2002 Ms. Becky R. Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row, Suite 300 Indianapolis, IN 46240-3809 RE: Cannel ambulatory Surgery And Endoscopy Center Dear Ms. Feigh: I have received and reviewed the information for the above-mentioned project. At the present time, I see nothing in the plans that would hamper law enforcement efforts. Ifwe can be of any further assistance to you, please contact us. Respectfully, 1t~ )). t. Mi, Michael. D. Fogarty { Chief of Police MDF:tka cc: Dept. of Community Services (317) 571-2500 A Nationally Accredit .. , 'forcement Agency !II Fax (317) 571-2512 .< I ., ... o o CARMEL/CLAY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA Date: August 21, 2002 Place:Department of Community Semces Conference Room 3rd Floor - Carmel City HaD 9,00 ~ m rf. 9'20 SI m 9,40 ~ m 10.00 ~ m 10"0 <;I m V'" 1 0'40 ~ m -j"Docket No. 108-02 SP; West Carmel Center, Block B, Lots 1 & 2 (Secondary Plat) The applicant seeks approval ofa Secondary Plat for a 2-lot subdivision. The site is located on the southeast comer of Commerce Drive and West 106th Street. The site is zoned B-5/Business and is subject to the US 421 Overlay requirements. Filed by Paul G. Reis of Drewry Simmons Pitts & Vornehm for West 106th Properties, LLC. Meridian Corners Professional Building #1 (Development Plan) The applicant seeks development plan approval to construct an office building. The site is located at the southeast comer of Meridian Comers Boulevard and Shakamac Drive. The site is zoned B-5/Business. Filed by Mike DeBoy of Mid States Engineering for Thornberry Investment, LLC. Aberdeen Bend (Secondary Plat and Construction Plans) The applicant seeks Secondary Plat approval to plat 26 lots on 24.23~ acres. The site is located on the north side of West 131st Street, ~ mile west of Towne Road. The site is zoned S-l/Residence - Estate. Filed by Doug Corey of Mid-States Engineering for the Jones Company. LaurelwoodlHenderson Maintenance Building (Site Construction Plans) The applicant seeks to construct a maintenance building within the Floodway. The site is located at 10211 Ditch Road, 1'4 mile south of 106tb Street. The site is zoned S-l/Residence - Very Low Density. Filed by R. J. Klein & Associates for Richard Henderson. Evangelical Baptist Mission (Use Variance Development Plans) The applicant seeks development pIan approval to construct an office building. The site is located on the east side ofShelbome Road, 1/8 mile north of West 96th Street. The site is zoned R-1/Residence. Filed by Charles D. Frankenberger of Nelson & Frankenberger for the Evangelical Baptist Missions. Carmel Ambulatory Surgery Center & Endo Center (Development Plan) The applicant seeks construction plan approval for a medical office building. The site is located at 13421 Old Meridian Street. Page 1 of 2 ~:::':(n :"~;::;,S (lC} (,-:orf<l ~fJ/?::t;;ie:f!s~,~_ ~) '/ or- 4~- ~ ~ cf i u o ... Page 2 of2 Technical Advisory Committee Agenda August 21, 2002 l1'lO~m 11 .~O ~ m 11 ':,\0 ~ m Filed by Becky Feigh ofBSA Design for St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Inc. Carmel Clay Historical Society (Use Variance Development Plan) The applicant seeks approval to construct an additional structure. The site is located at 211 First Street Southwest. The site is zoned R-2/Residence within the Old Town Overlay Zone. Filed by Balay Architects for the Carmel Clay Historical Society. Carmel Junior High School (Special Use Construction Plans) The applicant seeks approval of additions and renovations to an existing school facility. The site is located at 300 South Guilford Road. The site is zoned R- llResidence. Filed by Jeff Bolinger ofFanningIHowey Associates for Carmel/Clay Schools. ~G tf Clay Junior High School (Special Use Construction Plans) The applicant seeks approval of additions and renovations to an existing school facility. The site is located at 5150 East 126th Street. The site is zoned S- 1 t\, ~ llResidence - Low Density. fL.) Filed by Jeff Bolinger of Fanning /Howey Associates for Carmel/Clay Schools. ;:1-nI1 . , ,:; II ancil,~ ,.., [ , '" .~ (i /i'V, lir- _ "'.... -';~~8 rh~ c'"'j,,"'!',..,.....,-, .". r-"'':.-:e h::: tIn '. . ~ ';"'Hi-N:.lnV (-acilit':" _. ',i"""'''-'-'I _ -J' ... . ie~ . ~ ;,.I....i/V':"lI" 'f") -rh' _ ... "./J .r P l"r'''IJ;~'t~'' .--sS.1.l::./t.Af; ~" <-" ( Siyr~C'-~---'-'~_ ---X:-/302.. ~ Page 1 of 2 u u CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community SelVices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4aJ32 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax Phone: Frone ~ Pages: ~ Date: f- /<3 - O~ ~d~ To:.. ~~~ C/ Fax: {iCl- 7dtfP Re: ce: o Urgent 0 For Review 0 Please Comment 0 Please Reply o Please Recycle {ik/1l~/ AfiJbJ/qdY7 ~~Y-,.GJ~ ~+r //3- 00\ A-.lJ0 () u (,) CITY OF CARMEL Department of Community Seroices One Civic Square Carmel, IN 4S032 (317) 571-2417 Fax: (317) 571-2426 Fax ) To: &C,fl/ .H";~ / '" ?19- ?d2tfl From: ~~Gt , ~ r" /c2 -DOt Fax: Pages: Phone: Date: Re: ;7 At!/ 11 fl/Id", cc: D Urgent D For Review D PIease Comment D Please Reply D Please Recycle (Prm~/ 4/11 jJ/Q,.4,ry 5i.I(:l~rY c/,... . -'/Ie:( hdo C"'"-'?~r{ 2 ~ () 08/08/02 13:03 FAX u HAMILTON CO HWY. ~4~ Carmel DOCD (.;) 1m 0011001 HAMILTON COUNTY HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT August 8, 2002 Becky R. Feigh BSA Design 9365 Counselors Row. suite 300 Indianapolis, Indiana 46240-:3809 RE: Carmel Ambulatory Surgery and Endoscopy Center Site Plans S of Guilford Road 1 E of Old Meridian Road Clay Township Dear Ms. Feigh ~:;~7-;--T'~ / ., ,J-' -1/ I~, /" \....' , . ~ -........_,(<_.~I / >. ;;,.)/ A. '(,:~ '.','\ /........ '>' T "':,'\ (;<;' RECEIVED 'r-\ AUG 8 /200,1 1-),1 \:/\ DOCS' /] \.,., \. ,j '"" ~\. /~' '-. :; ~/...>, ,<, "\ .' ,-,/)' .~-- .--:<;;;'" \, ,Y "~~.~J~,L}~l~,~-~~~~/ This letter serves to acknowledge receipt of a transmittal received 08/07/02 containing the plans for the above-mentioned project. After reviewing the plans the Highway Department has the following comments: 1. It appears that this project lies within the limits of the City of Carmel, however, the frontage along Old Meridian Road Is still under the jurisdiction of the Hamilton County Highway Department. Any work to be performed within the right of way of Old Meridian will need to be permitted through this office. Please contact Mr. Robb Chadwell, Permit Inspector, for the necessary forms and information. 2. The Highway Department request the dedication of right of way In accordance with the Thoroughfare Plan. The right of way along Old Meridian is a 50' half. Please forward the dedication documents to my attention. If you have any questions or comments concemlng this letter, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Sincerely, ~J{~~ Staff Engineer cc: Jon Dobosiewlcz Steve Cash Robb Chadwell 1700 South 10.. Street ~oblesviUe,In.46060 www.co.hamilton.in.us Office (317) 773-7770 Fax (317) 776-9814 u ,0 Dobosiewicz, Jon C Subject: Fahey, Joyce D Thursday, August 01, 2002 1 :22 PM Dobosiewicz, Jon C; Lillig, Laurence M; Lawrence, Kelli A; Brewer, Scott I; Pattyn, Dawn E; Hollibaugh, Mike P New Submittal From: Sent: To: Received Thursday 8/01 Carmel Ambulatory Surg. & Endo Center The new file is on the PC shelf behind my desk. Joyce Fahey Planning and Zoning Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 ADLS Becky Feigh 317/571-2417 (Phone) 317/571-2426 (Fax) ?v gilA /01- /~ &J II 7 0 1.- ~ Email: jfahey@cLcarmel.in.us 1 JunPS 02 10:13a CORNERSTONE COS o 3175772481 Q LUlU'll ':J.'l'JJS.I.V1' CONCERNING !L'HE USE AND DEVELOPHEIr.r OF REAL ESTATE p.3 . , 5-ad-02; 4:10PM ... I eSA Deslgn;# Z i \. .I In accordance wit~ Indiana Code Section 36-7-4-613, 'St. Vincent Hospital and Health Care Center, Inc. (hereafter the "Owner"), the owner of the following described Rea1 Estate located in Hamil~on County, Indiana (hereafter the "Real Estate It), makes the fOllowinq COMMITMENT c'oncernl.ng' the deve10pment of the Real Estate to the Carmel Plan Commission and .the City of Carmel (hereafter jointly the .iCommission"): 1. Description of Real Estate - See Exhibit A (Real Estate). 2. Docket No. - 61-90";'Z 3. Statement of Commitments - Owner commits that th~ Real Estate shall be developed in substantial compliance wit~.the plans filed with the Department of Community Development except for such modifications and amendments. thereto approved or recommended by the Department of Community Development; the Carmel Plan Commission or the Car.me~ City Council. Owner further commits that it shall cause sigewalks to be installed on the real estate runn~ng parallel and adjacent to 01d.Meridi4n upon the adoption of a sidewa.lk'plan by the City of Carmel for the. area and upon the request of the Director of Community Development. Owner further commits to cooperate and assist the Departm~nt of Community Devalopment in the development of a street lighting plan for the area. 4. Bindin~ on Successors' and Assigns - This commitment is' binding on the OWn~r of the Real Estate, each subsequent.owner of the Real Estate and each othe~ person acquiring an interest in the Real Estate, unless modified' or ter.minated by the Commission. This Co~itment may be modified or terminated only by a decision of the Comm~ssion made at a public hearing after notice as provided by the ~les of the C~mm~ssion. 5. Effective Date - The Commitment contained herein.shall be effective upon t~e adoption.Qf an ordinance by the Carmel City Council changing the zoning classification of the Real Estate from the R-I District Classification to.th~ 8-5 District" 'Classification. 6. Recording - The;undersigned her~by authorizes the Director of Commun~ty Development or the Secretary of the Carmel Plan Commis~ion to record this ~ommitment irt the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County, Indiana'upon the grantlng of the 'approvals referred to in paragraph 5 above. 7. Enforcement - This 'commitment may be enforced by the Carmel Plan Commission and the Ci~y of Car.mel. Executed this .;2.8711 day of September, 19 go. ST VINCENT HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE . CENTER, INC. ay: \S~d -=1 ~ . , ;. 6-30'-02; 4: 10PM CORNERSTONE COS o 3175772481 o p.4 Jun p6 02 10:13a BSA DeSlgn;# 3 .-STATE OF INDIANA COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) ) ) 55: The undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said Cou~ty and State, acknowledged the execution of the foregoing by Bain J. Farris the President of St Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. . (n" tl) day WITNESSETH this ~o of September, 1990. t''ilJ,~' . u;'k.-/uJ.-lf..-/ Notary P ic . . bANi/} J- j},f..lnl'Jr/ Printed Name My Commission Expires; 'f/nn'l,L 10- 1Cs: . 90 . Residing i.n IJAryu" fcyJ County Prepared by: James J. Nelson NELSON & FRANKENBERGER 3021 East 98th Street, #220 ,Indianapoli.s, IN 46280 0" i ... .. i Jun p6 02 10:14a ';-' '5-'30'-02; 4: 10l=>M CORNERSTONE COS O. 3175772481 o p.5 . . . " . BSA De:slgn;~ 4 EXHIBIT A l ) A part of the Northwe~t Quarter and Southwest Quarter of the . Northwest Quarter of Section 25, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, Hamilton County, Indiana, described as follows: Beginning at the Nort~east corner of said Southwest Quarter; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes 43 seconds East (all bearings assumed) along the east line of said Southwest Quarte~ 523.45 feet to the Southeast ,earner of the land of St Vincent Hospital and Medical Center, Inc. (DR BK 347, Page 552, Office of tha Hamilton County Recorder); thence South BB degrees 2S minutes 26 seconds West along said. South line 653.26 feet (measured) 653.21 (deed) to the west line of the northeast quarter of said Southwest Quarter; thence North 00 degrees 29 minutes 36 seconds West along said West line 43~49 feet to the Southeastern right-of-way of5~ate Highway 31; thence North 35 degrees 00 minutes 56 seconda East along said right-of-way 59G.93 feet to the South line of Dennis C. Norman (Inst.! '.83-823.8, Office of the Recorder '); thenc~ South S8 deqrees 17 minutes 56 seconds West along said South l~ne 62.38 feet to the centerline of said'State Highway, also being the Northwestern line of s~id!NQrman; thence North 35 degrees 00 minutes S6 seconds East along said centerline 636.53 feet (measured) 631.32 feet (dee4) to the East line. of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest ~uarter of said Section 25; thence South 00 degrees 26 minutes. 43 seconds Bast alonq s~id East.linel also being the East line of St. Vincent Hospi~al and Med.j.ca~ Center (DR ai<. ~41,..Pijl9~ .3&4, Offi~e of the. .Recorder) 510.37 'feet (measured) 511.37 feet (deed) to the. point of beg.inning, containing 8.100 acres, more or leq~~.i" , . I I . , .' i ~ a . . ~n.~"'''m'~JI'Jl:U~ I