Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07040061 Site Plan SENT BY:SCHNElDER ENGINEERING ;12- 7-99 ; 8:04AM (317)895-2803"" 5747601:;# 2/ 2 .r-~ .~~ THE SCHNEIDER CORPORATION 3020 North Post Road Indlana.polls. Indiana 46226 -0066 317-696-8262 317-695-2603 ~'AX Engineering Surveying GIS " LIS Geology AI TRINITY ~ NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS BASED ON CONsTRUCTION PLAN$ OR RECORD DRA'MNGS AND IS NOT BASEO UPON A FlELD SURVEY, THE 5CHNfJDER CORP. OoEs NOT WARRANT THE ACCURACY OR SUFFICIENCY OF THIS INFORMA nON. THE CONTRACTOR SHOULO VERIFY EXISTING CONOll1ONS PRIOR TO !>N'l' CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCY FOUND UPON THIS DRAWING SHOULD BE REPORTED TO 1><E SCHNEIDER CORPORATION I~MEDiATELY; FAILURE TO DO so WILL fil::~lJLT IN THE CON"ffiACTORS Assu~pnON OF UABIUTY. LOT # 65 13 203 SF , r7Bl o ~ ?1~:;,.. , 01.97- '\ 1lE. j,S \l" __-- -~-----....- -- -- ---- ASSUMED NORTH SCALE 1" - 30' -- ( 41.3' I I I II '" I ~ I c> I '!! \" ;, \ ,,~ \ I I I "'\ 15.67 " D oJ 1\ 1"0.01 14 . 16-,00 .5 NOTE: IN THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS L1MITINC HEIGHT TO TWFNTY-FIVE (25) FEET. A DWELLING MAY BE INCREASED IN HEIGHT TO THIRTY-FIVE (:55) FEET PROVIDED THE SIDE AND REAR YARDS ARF. INCREASED AN ADDITIONAL FOOT FOR EACH FOOT SUCH STRUCTURE EXCEEDS TWENTY-FIVE (25) FEET IN 11EIGH'T. I'ER CARMEL ZONING ORDINANCE 26.1.1. '\ 160.01 PATIO " D oJ o '<t ~~ 'b \ ~ ~/ ,.--- 18.33" AUCU5T" " rlh.l &. ~Sl' RES FIT . 881.37 a,^"'- NlO CAll GAR f1"E - . BBD.n ~ PORCH L~ ~W * \ :1 BO.ol 22'; 6L W -,.- I 15" 0 & UE 79.95' " 179.51 TC ~ B76.32 PER SAN SEWER RECORD DRWG SQUARE FOOTAGE' PUBLIC WALK - 252 :t SF PRIVATE WALK- 93 Jc SF cONe. DRIVEWAY - 584 1: SF HYDIW SEEDING - 4,434 :t SF SOD -602 :t SQ YARDS I 3' BEHIND r,EAR OF HSE -..._- 5.5.0. RCU SPRING FARMS DRIVE CURs ----- 50' R/W 1--- W wQ WA TER UN( __w- 10.0' f->I~..t( f-lLAN w PREPARED FOR TRINITY HOMES PLOT PLAN LOT # 65 SPRING FARMS SECTION TWO INSTR. # 9709701948 P. C. # 1 SLIDE # 758 13532 SPRING FARMS DRIVE IPQ..9J PROI'OSED GRADE FLOOD HAZARD STATEMENT CERTIFICA TION . I , \\\\Ul11ItUj I "",~,< R. 1(';:111 ,....' . ~"\"\\I'"lt!llr'"j (...:~/// ::: C,,{\.uIS 1 (Ri'lf.., ::>- ~ f /' No. '\: \ :: *t S0389 ll* ~ ..-- ~ STAl[ OF ,/ ",."# ,'...... ~... .(~.:~,~lyor~t4~.~~~~,,-:- '//II~~O "SGR~\~~"" 1/1111111\1\\\ , "1: ::i 4:1 ? ( ~~ TYPICAL SWALE SECTION * APPROXIMATE LOCATION CONFIRM BEFORE CONSffiUCIlON 6" SAN. LA L WA TER SERVICE LINE & SUB-SERVlCE DRAIN LATERAL. &e~.. NOTE: GARAGE f.F .E. IS PROPOSED TO BE 4.7' ABOVE CURB INLET PE;R PLAN. iLOOD IIAZARD STATEMENT TRiNITY HOMES PO. # 297168 JOB # 99--124/-14 12-0J-99 EAe The Dl:el..lr'cc:y of cr,y flood Ma::l!ord dolo al<lOWI'l on lhl~ plot pion is subject to map l:icQle uncertainty and lo any o~I1(1r uncertaInly in locotion or eleY<"lUofl on th$ r~fl!lt'oOMeil!ld flood In!lurOI'lCoil!l rate map. ALL of the within dcscribBd land DOES NOT uE: withfn that special flood hazard zone A as ~o.id IgnQ plohi; by "cole gn communay-pum'/ II 180081 0002 C of the flood Insurance rote mapa for CARMEL. INDIANA (mopa doted MAY 19, 1981), ~u 17. Exterior a.) The brick air gap varied from y, inch to I inch. There was no exterior vapor barrier evident. There was no brick windowsill flashing evident. The weep hole quantity was inadequate along the Great Room west wall. Some weep holes were obscured by snow around the residence. There was no base flashing evident. b.) The aSB at the following locations had suspect black staining that was likely visible fungal growth: Under the Bedroom No.3 east duplex window Under the Library west triplex window Under the Bedroom No.2 north window The Library southwest corner upper brick invasive c.) The seal at the electrical meter box had deteriorated. The wood blocks behind the electrical meter box had deteriorated. There was no fungal growth noted on the interior of the residence. There was suspect fungal growth noted on the exterior of the residence during the investigation. Andersen Window Company manufactured the windows on the residence. Following is a list of the Engineer's recommendations for remediation of this house: 1. Bonus Room a.) No action is required at this time. 2. Bedroom No.3 a.) No action is required at this time. b.) Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. If water intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protoco 1. 3. Hallway Bathroom a.) No action is required at this time. 4. Bedroom No.2 a.) Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. If water intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protocol. 5. Master Bedroom a.) Evaluate the window for sources of water intrusion. Ifwater intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the window pursuant to current window water intrusion procedures. Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. If water intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protocol. 4 b.) Evaluate the window for sources of water intrusion. lfwater intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the window pursuant to current window water intrusion procedures. Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. If water intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protocol. 6. Master Bathroom a.) Evaluate the window for sources of water intrusion. If water intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the window pursuant to current window water intrusion procedures. 7. Master Closet a.) No action is required at this time. 8. Great Room a.) Evaluate the door for sources of water intrusion. Ifwater intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the door pursuant to current door water intrusion procedures. I f the suspect water staining is found to be the result of pedestrian traffic and not external water intrusion, then no further action is required at this time. b-c.) No action is required at this time. 9. Dining Room a.) Evaluate the window for sources of water intrusion. If water intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the window pursuant to current window water intrusion procedures. Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. If water intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protocol. 10. Library a.) Evaluate the window for sources of water intrusion. If water intrusion damage is encountered, remediate the window pursuant to current window water intrusion procedures. Perform an invasive visual inspection of the drywall. Ifwater intrusion damaged drywall is encountered, remediate all water damaged building materials pursuant to current protocol. I I. Nook a.) No action is required at this time. 12. Laundry Room a.) No action is required at this time. 13. Kitchen a.) No action is required at this time. 14. Foyer a.) No action is required at this time. 5 15. Crawl Space a.) No action is required at this time. 16. Garage a.) No action is required at this time. 17. Exterior a.) Open all of the existing weep holes in un-remediated brick walls. Install weep holes along the base brick ledge as necessary around the residence pursuant to current protocol. Install a drainage mat in all weep holes. Replace the brick windowsills pursuant to current protocol. b.) Remove the brick surrounding the damaged OSB, remediate all damaged OSB, and install new brick and flashing pursuant to current protocol at the following: Under the Bedroom No.3 east duplex window Under the Library west triplex window Under the Bedroom No.2 north window The Library southwest corner upper brick invasive c.) Seal the perimeter of the electrical meter box. Replace the wood blocks with treated wood blocks. 18. Miscellaneous a.) All downspouts should be extended to terminate at least six feet from the foundation. This is an owner responsibility. b.) The owner should make sure that any spray irrigation heads are kept away from the foundation walls. c.) The owner should not allow downspouts to discharge into landscape areas adjacent to the structure. d.) The gutters need to be evaluated for size, slope, and downspout placement. The house is a Category Number 2 Intervention under the Brick Water lntrusion Protocol. Proper drainage away from the structure is very important. If water is continually allowed to stand around the foundation the underlying soils can become saturated and weaken. This could allow unwanted differential settlement of the structure. The previous comments are prepared based on the assumption that proper maintenance will bc followed to protect this structure. This includes as a minimum, kceping gutters and downspouts clean and keeping water away from the foundation. 6 If you have any questions, please feel free to call. Very truly yours, TRIAD ASSOCIATES, INC. Engineering 'I< Architecture --ct.-."fI--..~ Thomas M. Schubert, P.E. TMS/dep 7