The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondencePlan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 1 Urban Forestry Daren Mindham 4/22/24 2:06 PM Changemark tree preservation fencing please show and label tree preservation fencing at the construction limits where existing trees to be preserved are shown. C500 EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:24 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet L100 for updates. Resolved 2 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/25/24 3:53 PM Changemark Operating Authority Per Section 102.02.i of the STSM, please revise the operating authority to the City of Carmel. C001 TITLE SHEET.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C001 for updates Resolved 3 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/25/24 4:46 PM Changemark Horizontal Datum Per Section 102.02.v.a of the STSM, please revise to include a note indicating the horizontal datum. Please note that the horizontal datum shall be based on Indiana State Plan Coordinates, NAD83. C100 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 4 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/25/24 4:46 PM Changemark Ex. Pond Information Per Section 102.02.v.b of the STSM, please revise to include the existing pond information including, at a minimum, normal pool, 2-year elevation, 10-year elevation, 100-year elevation, and top of bank elevation. C100 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 5 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/25/24 4:46 PM Changemark Taylor Trace Regulated Drain Per Section 102.02.v.i of the STSM, please revise to label the Taylor Trace Regulated Drain. C100 EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND INITIAL EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 6 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark 100-year Overflow Paths Per Section 102.02.xi.g and 102.02.xi.k of the STSM, please revise to include 100-year overflow paths/ponding areas shown as hatched areas, along with all associated easements. The emergency flood routing path(s) and their invert elevations from detention facilities to the receiving system shall also be shown. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/19/24 2:46 PM ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C320 for updates Resolved 7 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark Ex. Pond Info Per Section 102.02.v.b of the STSM, please revise to include the existing pond information including, at a minimum, normal pool, 2-year elevation, 10-year elevation, 100-year elevation, and top of bank elevation. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:13 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved REVIEW COMMENTS Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 8 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark Public Private Network Per Section 102.02.xi.h of the STSM, please revise to include a note indicating the system to be public or private. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 9 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark UG Detention Information Per Section 102.02.xi.j of the STSM, please revise to include underground detention information that includes, at a minimum, type of chamber to be used, number of chambers, number of end caps, bottom of stone base elevation, bottom of chamber elevation, top of chamber elevation, top of stone elevation, 10-year elevation, 100-year elevation, and emergency high- water elevation. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:24 PM The revised 100-year emergency high-water elevation is included; See Sheet C300 for updates. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/19/24 4:04 PM Please revise to include the emergency high-water elevation that is conveyed over the emergency spillway. Per the drainage report, it appears that elevation is 846.89. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 10 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark Drainage Summary Per Section 102.02.xi.m of the STSM, please revise to include a drainage summary, which summarizes the basic conditions of the drainage design, including site acreage, off-site/upstream acreage, allowable release rates, post-developed 10-year, and 100-year flows leaving the site, volume of detention required, volume of detention provided, and any release rate. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 11 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 9:20 AM Changemark Definition of Minimum Flood Protection Grade Per Section 102.02.xi.p of the STSM, please revise to include the definition of minimum flood protection grade in accordance with this manual. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 12 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 10:40 AM Changemark MFPG and MLAG Per Section 104.02 of the STSM, please revise to include the MFPG and LAG for the proposed building. Please note that the MFPG and MLAG shall be no less than 2 feet above any adjacent 100-year regional flood elevations, 2-feet above the emergency overflow weir elevation, and 1-foot above localized ponding. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 13 1 Vectren Energy Chad Miller 4/26/24 10:50 AM Changemark CenterPoint Energy Please have the owner contact our new service center at 1-800-990-1930 with additional load information on the proposed building addition. The existing gas meter may need to be resized to accommodate the additional load. C400 UTILITY PLAN.pdf Info Only 14 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Existing Regulated Drain The project site is located within the Taylor Trace Regulated Drain. Please revise to include discussion on the existence of the Taylor Trace Regulated Drain and the coordination/approvals that have been obtained with the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. Please include all relevant documentation of said correspondence. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:25 PM Comment acknowledged; See Appendix D of the Revised Drainage Report for coordination/approvals from the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/19/24 3:21 PM This comment will be considered fully resolved once approval from Hamilton County Surveyor's Office has been received and uploaded to Project Dox. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Proposed Conditions section of the Revised Drainage Report. Outlet permit coordination has been initiated with the Hamilton County Surveyor's office. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 15 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Emergency Spillway Calculations Per Section 102.03.i.c.iii and 302.11 of the STSM, please revise to include a discussion on the location of the emergency spillway, how it will function, the elevations achieved through the emergency spillway and include the calculations showing that it can convey 1.25 times the peak inflow discharge resulting from the 100-year design storm event runoff from the entire contributing watershed draining to the UG detention, assuming post- development condition on-site and existing condition off-site. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:25 PM The revised outlet control structure is a 36" Nyloplast drain basin, and the revised emergency spillway weir length is a minimum of 2 ft. The revised Outlet Control Structure detail provides adequate space for the weir place. See Sheets C603 and Appendix D of the Drainage Report for updates. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/20/24 10:01 AM The included Emergency Spillway Calculations show a emergency spillway weir length of 4 feet; however, per the Outlet Control Structure Detail on the Storm Details (C603), the outlet structure is a 30" Nyloplast drain basin. Also, it appears that per the location of the orifice/weir plate, it will be located where the plate cannot extend across the full inside diamter of 30". Please review and revise the emergency spillway calculations and any relevant plan elements accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:14 PM Comment addressed; See Apendix D of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 16 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Ex. 146th Street Watershed Calculations Per Section 302.03 of the STSM, for site where pre-developed area has more than one (1) outlet, the release rate should be computed based on pre- developed discharge to each outlet point. Please revise to include discussion and calculations showing that the post-developed discharge for the 146th Street watersheds do not exceed the pre-developed discharge to the 146th Street watershed. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM Comment addressed; See Drainage Report for updates Resolved 17 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Ex. 146th St. Basin Information Per Section 102.03.i.a.i of the STSM, please revise to include the area, curve number and time of concentration information for the Ex. 146th St. basin on the pre-developed watershed map. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix B of Drainage Report for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 18 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Post-Developed Basin Information Per Section 1012.03.i.b.i of the STSM, please revise the post-developed basin to label the area, curve number and time of concentration as one whole area versus including the information here for Basin 101 and Basin 102. In the post-developed modeling calculations, the model is not set up where Basin 101 and Basin 102 are separate nodes, there is only one proposed development node used in the drainage modeling. If it is desired to maintain showing both Basin 101 and Basin 102 information separately here, please revise the drainage modeling to reflect that and revise this map to show the boundaries of the Basin 101 watershed and Basin 102 watershed. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM The post-developed basin is represented by Basin 101 and Basin 102 separately; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 19 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Casting Open Area and Perimeter Length Please revise to include the open area and perimeter length used in the inlet capacity calculations for the proposed castings. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 20 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Staging Hydrograph Per Section 102.03.i.c.i of the STSM, please revise to include the staging hydrograph that shows the peak elevation achieved in the 10-year and 100- year scenarios. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix D of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 21 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark 90% Capacity Restoration Per Section 302.06.1 of the STSM, please provide calculations showing that a minimum 90% of the original detention capacity is restored within 48 hours from the start of the design 100-year storm. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:15 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix D of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 22 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark 10% Additional Capacity Per Section 302.06.11 of the STSM, Detention basins shall be designed with an additional ten (10) percent of available capacity to allow for sediment accumulation. Please revise to include those calculations. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix D of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 23 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark 25 Separation between Detention and Building Per Section 302.06.2 of the STSM, the 100-year elevation of stormwater detention facilities shall be separated by not less than 25 feet from any building or structure to be occupied. The building is close than 25 feet to the proposed UG detention. Please revise to achieve the minimum 25-foot separation. C400 UTILITY PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C400 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 24 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 11:22 AM Changemark Stormwater Easement Per Section 302.06.10 of the STSM, a minimum of fifteen (15) feet horizontally from the top of bank of the facility, or the 100-year pool if no defined top of bank is present, shall be dedicated as permanent stormwater easement if the above-noted boundary of the common area does not extend that far. Please revise to include the required easement. C400 UTILITY PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:26 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C400 for updates. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/20/24 8:39 AM It appears that the variable easement shown on the plans is only +/-5 feet from the footprint of the UG detention. Please revise the easement so it provides the minimum 15 feet easement width measured from the UG detention footprint. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C400 for updates Resolved 25 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:32 PM Changemark Leach Field Please revise to include the location of the leach field that this septic is supposed to drain to and show the proposed piping to said leach field. Please note that this is not allowed to be connected directly to the proposed storm sewer. Please revise the note to remove that verbiage. C400 UTILITY PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Per Carmel Utilities Sewer Operations Manager, Benjamin Donald, as part of the neighborhood's sanitary sewer installation a lateral stub out was provided for the project site located within the 10' sanitary sewer easement. The new service connection from the proposed building will connect to this existing stub out in accordance with the required minimum slope and connection requirements of the City of Carmel Uitlities specifications; See Sheet C400 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 26 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:35 PM Changemark WQ Curve Number Please revise to include calculations showing how the water quality curve number of 96 was determined using the Curve Number Calculation for Water Quality Storm Event Chart (Exhibit 701-1 of the STSM). Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:27 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix E of Drainage Report for updates. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/20/24 9:08 AM The water quality curve number calculation shows a total area of 0.30 acres but the proposed basin map shows a total area of 0.31 acres. The water quality curve number calculation shows a total of 0.18 acres of impervious area but the Runoff Coefficient and Runoff Curve Number Calculations show a total of 0.19 acres of impervious area. Please review and revise. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix E of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 27 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:41 PM Changemark Street Name Please correct the street name to 146th Street. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Drainage Report for updates Resolved 28 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:42 PM Changemark Street Name #2 Please correct the street name to 146th Street. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM Comment addressed; See Drainage Report for updates Resolved 29 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:44 PM Changemark Proposed Basin Modeling Information Please revise this table to accurately reflect the information used in the drainage modeling software. The modeling does not show two proposed basins combining into one, it only shows one proposed basin that appears to combine Basins 101 and 102 into one basin. Please review and revise. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:16 PM The post-developed basin is represented by Basin 101 and Basin 102 separately; See Drainage Report for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 30 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:50 PM Changemark Plan Sheet C605 This plan sheet does not match the plan sheet C605 included in the drainage report. Please review and revise. C605 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 31 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:50 PM Changemark Plan Sheet C605 This plan sheet does not match Plan Sheet C605 that was submitted. Please review and revise. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 32 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:54 PM Changemark 10-year and 100-year Elevation The 10-year and 100-year elevation do not match the plan sheet C603 that was included in the drainage report. Please review and revise accordingly. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 33 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 1:54 PM Changemark 10-year and 100-year Elevation The 10-year and 100-year elevation do not match what is included on Sheet C603 in the plan set. Please review and revise accordingly. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 34 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 2:05 PM Changemark Outlet Structure Detail Please revise to include a detail of the outlet structure. The drainage modeling indicates an orifice size of 6" is used but there are no details in the plans showing how that is implemented in to Str. 106. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix C of Drainage Report for updates Resolved 35 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 4/26/24 2:07 PM Changemark Outlet Pipe Please revise to model the outflow pipe (Str. 106) in the drainage modeling. Please also address any tailwater effects caused by discharging to the existing pond to the south. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM The proposed outlet pipe/end section (STR#107) outlets 3.07' above the existing 100-yr elevation of Taylor Trace pond, thus allowing free outfall for the proposed underground detention system. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 36 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 5/3/24 2:53 PM Changemark Sidewalk connection relocation Revise the plan to provide a more direct sidewalk connection from the path along 146th St to the sidewalk along the west side of the building that leads to the main entrance(s). C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:03 AM An elongated sidewalk such as the one shown is needed in order to maintain ADA compliance while navigating the steep change in grade between the existing building door way and existing sidewalk at 146th street . An alternative would be to have multiple guard rail ramps but this would be impractical/unaesthetic. Sidewalk length must be quite long to build up in grade. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: David Littlejohn - 6/26/24 3:44 PM The proposed revision to the sidewalk is still an indirect route from the path along 146th St to the sidewalk along the west side of the building. Please move the connection further to the west to provide a direct connection. Is it possible to reduce the drive width to allow for a more direct connection? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:24 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C200 for updates. Resolved 37 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/6/24 4:27 PM Changemark Building dimensions Please label the buildings longest and widest dimensions. C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:42 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C200 for updates. Resolved 38 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/6/24 4:27 PM Changemark Label distances Please label the distances from the corner of the building to each property line. C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:42 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C200 for updates. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 39 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:15 PM Changemark Lot Coverage Max This lot was developed under R-1/ROSO III which means it is exempt from lot coverage requirements. Please make this statement on the Data Table. C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:43 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C200 for updates. Resolved 40 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:15 PM Changemark Minimum 2 way drive aisle Minimum 2 way drive aisle is 25'. Please increase by 1'. 60 degree angled parking can have a 24' wide drive aisle if you would like to modify the parking space orientation. C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:44 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Drive aisle width is increased to 25'; See Sheet C200 for updates. Resolved 41 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:15 PM Changemark Wide driveway apron Is it necessary to have a driveway apron this large? It just seems very big compared to the size of the building on the site. C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:51 PM Please connect with David Lucas at Hamilton County Highway Dept., there may be different requirements for you to conform to. 317-773-7770 or david.lucas@hamiltoncounty.in.gov. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM The driveway apron follows Carmel Standard Drawing Detail 10-22 Commercial Driveway Depressed Curb, featuring a 25' wide drive aisle and 30' radius to connect to 146th Street. We are open to downsizing this entrance base upon feedback from Planning & Zoning on a prefered layout. Info Only 42 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:15 PM Changemark Number of parking spaces Based on the building square footage, only 9 parking spaces are required. (1 per 250 sq. ft.) C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 43 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:16 PM Changemark Docket number Please add the docket number - 2024-00069 DP/ADLS to the title page. C001 TITLE SHEET.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:44 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C001 for updates. Resolved 44 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:17 PM Changemark Zoning clarification Please add that this is part of Taylor Trace subdivision, zoned R-1/ROSO III. C001 TITLE SHEET.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:46 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C001 for updates. Resolved 45 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:54 PM Changemark Trim color What is the proposed trim color for around the windows and roofline trim? Architectural Elevations.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:51 PM Ok, thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM The eave trim, gutter boards and window trim will be painted SW 6245 Quicksilver; closely matches the siding color. Resolved 46 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:54 PM Changemark Window sills Please provide a more substantial window sill over the water table stone. Or, move the windows up on the wall so that the same trim can go all around the window. (This applies to all windows on the new portion of the building.) Architectural Elevations.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:50 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM The windows will be shortened to provide the same trim below the window and above the stone wainscot. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 47 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:54 PM Changemark Existing house materials Please clarify what, if any of the materials on the existing house are new. Or are you simply going to paint and repair siding and match existing stone? Architectural Elevations.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:47 PM Thank you. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM The existing house wil be resided and have the thin stone veneer applied to match the new addition. Also the North Elevation will be reworked to clean up the dormer and hip roof detail to match the rest of the structure. Resolved 48 1 Planning & Zoning Rachel Keesling 5/7/24 3:57 PM Changemark Number of parking spaces Please revise this drawing to show the reduction to 13 parking spaces. Architectural Site Plan.pdf Reviewer Response: Rachel Keesling - 6/17/24 4:53 PM A different plan over aerial photo was provided. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:22 PM Plan updated to match accurate parking count Resolved 49 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please provide all technical information required by Section 102.02(xi)(m) of the Storm Water Technical Standards Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 50 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that there are no direct discharge areas Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:17 PM Area od direct discharge to the right of way do not exceed that of current conditions, no gererate higher flow to the right of way. Resolved 51 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that all elevations are North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD) Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 52 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that the horizontal datum of topgraphic map is Indiana State Plane Coordinates, NAD83 Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 53 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of existing utilities with top of curb and invert elevations, pipe sizes, and direction are shown Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 54 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that all existing culverts, pipes, and bridges on existing drives or under the roadway are shown indicating size, type, and invert elevations Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 55 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of all existing electrical power vaults, transformers, power lines, gas lines, television cable , and telephone lines are shown Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C100 for updates Resolved 56 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please provide all on-site and off-site flood routing through the site Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C320 for updates Resolved 57 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please show the 100-year elevations of all inlets in the clogged conditions Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:18 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C320 for updates Resolved 58 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/8/24 3:16 PM Library Comment Please provide the minimum flood protection grade (MFPG) and minimum lowest adjacent grade (MLAG) elevations and definitions of each Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:19 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 59 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/9/24 10:47 AM Changemark Curbing is required along the perimeter of all parking lots Per Section 5.28(E)(2) of the Unified Development Ordinance, the perimeter of all parking lots shall be curbed unless a stormwater quality BMP is installed along the edge of the parking. Please show the curbing on the parking or pursue one of the following: - a variance from this standard, which you will need to work with the Planning and Zoning Department on - include a stormwater quality BMP along the parking and detail out for our review C200 SITE PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:19 PM Curbing is shown along the perimter of the parking lot; See Sheet C200 for updates Resolved 60 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/9/24 10:51 AM Changemark Please provide the critical elevations for both detention facilities on this sheet Please include the critical elevations of the underground detention and the existing detention pond on this sheet. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:19 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C300 for updates Resolved 61 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:13 AM Changemark Please show all storm lines to and from this structure It appears that the southeast corner and a portion of the eastern side yard is being directed to this inlet. Is this structure part of the existing developments drainage system or a private line? Is it within an existing drainage easement? If so, please show on the plans. C300 GRADING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:19 PM The referred to inlet was incorrectly labeled and is removed from the plans now Resolved 62 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:21 AM Changemark Please show the roof drains and provide the information missing in this section C400 UTILITY PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C500 for updates Resolved 63 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:26 AM Changemark Please show erosion control blanket over the disturbance created from trenching the pipe C500 EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C500 for updates Resolved 64 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:26 AM Changemark Please show the BMP easement on this sheet C500 EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C500 for updates Resolved 65 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:26 AM Changemark Please call out the isolator row BMP on this sheet Thank you for hatching this but we would like a label provided as well. C500 EROSION CONTROL PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C500 for updates Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 66 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 9:28 AM Changemark Please provide the water quality unit size as well as a description of the isolator row in this section C510 STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C510 for updates Resolved 67 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 10:10 AM Changemark Please include the isolator row and the size of the water quality unit in this section O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See O&M Manual for updates Resolved 68 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 10:10 AM Changemark Please provide a maintenance section for the water quality unit O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See O&M Manual for updates Resolved 69 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 10:10 AM Changemark Please show the underground detention chambers/isolator row on the site map O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:20 PM Comment addressed; See O&M Manual for updates Resolved 70 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 10:10 AM Changemark The storm configuration seems slightly different on this sheet that what is shown in the plans, please clarify O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Comment addressed; See O&M Manual for updates Resolved 71 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 5/10/24 10:10 AM Changemark Please show the BMP easement on the site map O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM Comment addressed; See O&M Manual for updates Resolved 72 1 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 5/10/24 3:42 PM Comment All signs require a separate sign permit application and review process. Please apply when ready. Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 73 1 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 5/10/24 3:44 PM Comment Please include sign placement on appropriate elevation as well as sign details. Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 9/27/24 1:06 PM Signs are existing. A sign permit application will be required when updating the secondary projection sign faces. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gehan Mendis - 9/12/24 2:41 PM Signage details to be provided at a later date. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 8/23/24 1:05 PM Signage is part of this review, please provide information as to sign proposed and proposed location. Signage is an integral part of the ADLS Amend and should be included in this proposal if it will be present. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:01 AM Signage details to be provided at a later date. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:23 PM Further signage details forthcoming Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 74 1 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 5/10/24 3:46 PM Comment Per the application one sign is being proposed. Will there be any directional incidental signs proposed as well? If so, please provide plan. Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 9/27/24 1:08 PM Petitioner states that there will be a stop sign and stop bar pavement striping. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Gehan Mendis - 9/12/24 2:41 PM Signage details to be provided at a later date. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 8/23/24 1:39 PM All directional and incidental signage possibly desired should be provided. Will there be no proposal at all? Signage is an integral part of the ADLS Amend and should be included in this proposal if it will be present. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:02 AM No directional signage is currently provided in plans ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 6/19/24 12:06 PM ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:23 PM Signage plan forthcoming Resolved 75 1 Hamilton County Surveyor Samuel Clark 5/16/24 3:15 PM Comment Please submit an outlet connection permit for the direct connection to the Taylor Trace regulated drain. Responded by: Gehan Mendis - 9/12/24 2:40 PM Outlet Connection Permit is approved and provided; see Appendix D of the Drainage Report. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 3:57 PM Outlet Connection Permit is approved and provided. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM An outlet connection permit has been submitted to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 76 1 Hamilton County Surveyor Samuel Clark 5/16/24 3:15 PM Comment Submittal is incomplete. Please submit physical drainage calculations to our office. Responded by: Gehan Mendis - 9/12/24 2:40 PM Drainage calculations have been submitted as a paper copy to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:00 AM Drainage calculations have been submitted as a paper copy to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 6/13/24 12:21 PM The drainage report will be submitted as a paper copy to the Hamilton County Surveyor's Office Resolved 77 2 Urban Forestry Daren Mindham 6/14/24 6:54 PM Changemark invasive pear marked for removal Please remove these from the plan as they are marked for removal on the L102 sheet. L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:06 AM Comment addressed; refer to revised sheet L100 Resolved 78 2 Urban Forestry Daren Mindham 6/14/24 6:54 PM Changemark 3 junipers marked for removal Please remove these off the plans and any others marked for removal. L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/9/24 11:06 AM Comment addressed; refer to revised sheet L100 Resolved 79 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/18/24 12:52 PM Changemark Is the hatching for this elevation not shown or is the callout meant for the ponding to the west? C320 EMERGENCY FLOOD ROUTING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:58 PM The 100-Year emergency elevation of 850.81' refers to Storm STR 101. Resolved 80 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/18/24 12:52 PM Changemark It appears that the ponding would extend past the property line Per the grading plan and the elevations shown on this sheet, the property line elevations are to match the existing elevations. Due to this, the ponding elevation of 849.74 would spill over onto the adjacent property and require a drainage easement to be obtained from the adjacent property owner. Please obtain this easement or regrade the site to avoid ponding on neighboring property. C320 EMERGENCY FLOOD ROUTING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:58 PM A berm with a high point greater than the 100-yr emergency overflow elevation is graded between the western property line and the parking lot to prevent ponding from spilling over onto the western adjacent property. The berm extends beyond the right-of-way line to ensure minimum overflow ponding from sheet flowing to the western adjacent property as it does in existing conditions. See Sheet C320 for updates. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 81 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/18/24 12:52 PM Changemark Is the clogged condition ponding in this area shown correctly? The grading to the northwest of the inlet is lower than the ponding area currently shown. It appears that the water would pond and spill over onto the adjacent property. Please reevaluate this area and confirm the ponding locations. If any ponding or overflow will occur on the adjacent property, an easement will need to be obtained from the property owner. C320 EMERGENCY FLOOD ROUTING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 2:00 PM A berm with a high point greater than the 100-yr emergency overflow elevation is graded between the western property line and the parking lot to prevent ponding from spilling over onto the western adjacent property. The berm extends beyond the right-of-way line to ensure minimum overflow ponding from sheet flowing to the western adjacent property as it does in existing conditions. See Sheet C320 for updates. Resolved 82 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/18/24 12:55 PM Changemark Please provide a legend item for this bold line We are not sure what this line is and can see it being easily interpreted as a contour line. Please clearly identify this line. C320 EMERGENCY FLOOD ROUTING PLAN.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 3:56 PM Comment addressed; See Sheets C100, C300, C301, C320, and C500 for updates Resolved 83 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Chamber Type The chamber specified on the Grading Plan and detail included on the ADS Details show a MC-3500 chamber unit, not a DC-780 unit. Please review and revise. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:27 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved 84 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Bottom of Chamber Elevation Please revise this detail to include the bottom of chamber elevation. Per the chamber information shown on the Grading Plan, this appears to be at an elevation of 844.88. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved 85 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Top of Chamber Elevation Please revise this detail to include the top of chamber elevation. Per the chamber information shown on the Grading Plan, this appears to be at an elevation of 848.63. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved 86 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Top of Stone Elevation This elevation does not match the information shown on the Grading Plan. The Grading Plan identifies the top of stone elevation as 849.63, not 848.63. Please review and revise. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved 87 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Total Chamber Depth Please revise the total chamber depth with the updated elevations shown on the Grading Plan. Per the information on the Grading Plan, it appears that this total depth is 5.5 feet. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 88 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:37 AM Changemark Emergency Spillway Elevation Please add the emergency spillway elevation to this detail. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Sheet C603 for updates. Resolved 89 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:39 AM Changemark Typical UG Detention Section Please update this typical UG Detention Section per the comments included on the Site Details (C603). Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:28 PM Comment addressed; See Appendix D of Drainage Report for updates. Resolved 90 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:54 AM Changemark Underdrain Invert It appears that the underdrain invert does not match the bottom of stone elevation. Standard practice is for the underdrain elevation to match the bottom stone elevation. Please review and revise. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:29 PM The underdrain and outlet pipe invert is slightly higher than the bottom of stone elevation to meet cover requirements and daylight into the pond at the highest elevation possible to minimize disturbance to the Taylor Trace common area. When sizing the underground detention system, the volume of stone between the underdrain invert and bottom of stone were not counted towards available detention volume. The proposed underground detention system has sufficient volume to detain the captured runoff from site. Resolved 91 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 9:57 AM Changemark Outlet Pipe Invert Elevation It appears that the outlet pipe elevation does not match the bottom stone elevation. If the outlet pipe elevation does not match the bottom stone elevation, then the bottom stone may not be counted towards available detention volume. Please review and revise accordingly. C603 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:29 PM The underdrain and outlet pipe invert is slightly higher than the bottom of stone elevation to meet cover requirements and daylight into the pond at the highest elevation possible to minimize disturbance to the Taylor Trace common area. When sizing the underground detention system, the volume of stone between the underdrain invert and bottom of stone were not counted towards available detention volume. The proposed underground detention system has sufficient volume to detain the captured runoff from site. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 92 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 6/20/24 10:30 AM Changemark 10-Year In-Line Max Flow Rate It appears that the maximum 10-year flow rate to the water quality unit is 1.45 cfs, which exceeds the maximum 10-year in-line flow rate for an XC-2 unit. Please review and revise accordingly. Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Gehan Mendis - 9/12/24 2:39 PM Treatment train is revised to an on-line XC-3 to handle treatment flow and 10-year on-line flow rate. The appropriate XC-3 detail is provided; see Sheet C606 for updates. References to the diversion manhole and diversion weir are removed from the submission. See Appendix E of the Drainage Report for updates. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 8/16/24 11:40 AM Please revise the drainage report to include calculations showing how the diversion weir height was derived. Also, please revise the aquaswirl detail in the plans and drainage report to reflect the proposed horseshoe configuration. Additionally, there are constructability concerns with the diversion structure. It seems that a substantial amount of the diversion manhole will need cut out for pipe holes and there may not be enough material to attach a weir plate. Please review and revise accordingly. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:57 PM The configuration has been revised to a horseshoe aquaswirl (off-line) where the XC-2 unit is able to treat the required water quality treatment flow of the site. See Appendix E of the Drainage Report for updates. Resolved 93 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/20/24 12:00 PM Changemark The plan and profiles call for a manhole type C for this structure Please remove this call out and utilize a concrete structure as shown in the type C detail. C605 SITE DETAILS.pdf Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 3:56 PM The Storm Plan & Profile is revised to reflect a 30" Nyloplast inlet per the ADS detail; See Sheet C410 for updates. Resolved 94 2 Carmel Water Operations Brett Ransford 6/28/24 2:30 PM Comment backflow device will need to be installed on domestic line Responded by: David Welch - 8/8/24 1:24 PM Comment addressed; See Keynote W1 on Sheet C400 for updates. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: PZ-2024-00069 DP ADLS Independent Senior Insurance Workflow Started: 4/18/2024 11:01:06 AM Report Generated: 10/02/2024 12:10 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 95 3 Engineering Alex Jordan 8/14/24 2:22 PM Comment We have no further comments on the plans. Before we can issue a stormwater management permit, the following items need to be provided: 1. A signed and recorded O&M manual 2. A stormwater engineers estimate for all temporary and permanent stormwater measures 3. A non-expiring stormwater performance bond for 100% the approved estimate 4. A completed BMP easement agreement with exhibit and legal description 5. Drainage approval from Crossroad Engineers 6. A stormwater management permit application (this can be applied for here: https://cw.carmel.in.gov/PublicAccess/login) Info Only