HomeMy WebLinkAboutLetter #031 Peter Ratcliffe
Butler, Bric
From:peter peterratcliffe.com <peter@peterratcliffe.com>
Sent:Wednesday, November 6, 2024 10:13 AM
To:Butler, Bric
Subject:Concerns Regarding Proposed Development in West Carmel
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Flagged
Dear Mr. Butler,
I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed development in our village. I respectfully request
that my concerns be shared with each member of the Planning Commission as they review this project.
My objections are based on the following key issues:
Inconsistent Architectural Style: The proposed project is not consistent with the architectural style
and character of homes in west Carmel. Our community values its distinctive appearance, and
this development could disrupt the cohesive aesthetic.
Incompatible Property Values: The proposed project does not align with the property values in the
Village of WestClay. This inconsistency could adversely affect the value of existing properties in
the area.
Greenspace and Common Area Issues: The planned greenspace and common areas are not in
harmony with the Village’s layout and existing neighborhood standards. Our community
prioritizes open, well-integrated public spaces that foster a welcoming environment, which this
proposal fails to provide.
Excessive Density: The density of this development is too high and does not reflect the more
balanced population distribution within the Village. Such density could strain community
resources and infrastructure.
Potential for Lowered Property Values: There is a concern that this development may lower
property values within the Village, which would have long-term implications for current residents.
Insufficient Setback, Screening, or Buffer: The proposed setback and buffer zones are limited,
failing to offer the level of privacy and separation expected in our community. This could disrupt
the quality of life for nearby residents.
High Lot Coverage: With 90% or more lot coverage, the proposed development is far denser than
existing properties in the area. This contrasts sharply with the Village’s preference for lower-
density, open-lot designs.
Incompatible Architecture: The architectural design of the proposed buildings is inconsistent with
the Village’s established aesthetic, raising concerns about the cohesion of the neighborhood.
Rental Community Concerns: Many residents are concerned that the development may turn into a
rental community, which could impact neighborhood stability and community investment.
I appreciate your attention to these concerns and ask that they be carefully considered by the Planning
Commission members as they deliberate on this proposal. Thank you for ensuring that these points are
shared.
Sincerely,
1
Peter Ratcliffe
c (312) 834-6417
e peter@peterratcliffe.com
w peterratcliffe.com
a 12665 Apsley Lane, Carmel, IN
2