Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes TAC 11-15-06 ~ . Carmel Technical Advisory ~mmittee Minutes (.;) November 'IS, 2006 meeting use variance, but that she would have comments at the DP/ ADLS phase. ...END... 9: 153m. Docket No. 06110003 SP: Midwest ISO Replat The applicant seeks approval to plat 2 lots on 10.042 acres. The site is located at the northwest corner of City Center Drive and West Carmel Drive, and is zoned M3. Filed by Stacey Fouts of DeBoy of Land Development Services for Lauth Property Group, LLC. Present for the Petitioner: Mike DeBoy and Brent White with DeBoy Land Development Services. Petitioner's Presentation: Brent White introduced the project. He said that they were proposing to make two lots out of the site. He said that the petitioners still haven't decided what they will be doing with the outlot. Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office: He said that he had no concerns with the replat. Chuck Shupperd, Vectren Energy: He said that he had no issues with the replat. Shirley Hunter, Duke Energy: She said that she had talked to Shawn South. She said that he had indicated that he didn't have finalized plans and that he would like to have finalized plans and an AutoCAD file. Nick Redden, Carmel Engineering: He said that Carmel Engineering had requested a print of a plat and that they would provide comments on the project when they received the print of the plat. Karyn Ryg, DOCS: She said that she had not had a chance to review the project yet. She said that she would provide comments when she was done reviewing the plat. Matt Griffin, DOCS: He said that the primary plat would appear on the Plan Commission agenda November 21, 2006. He also noted that there would a mandatory waiting period on the plats. Christine Barton-Holmes, DOCS: She had no comments. ...END... The appl1cant see s approval to reconfigure Block H within West Carmel Marketp lace. The site is located north of 98th Street on J\'Iichigan Road, and is zoned B3. Filed by John R. Heshelman of vVoolpert, Inc. for Duke Construction, LLC. -+ u u . Carmel Technical Advisory Committee Minutes November 15,2006 meeting ~ Present for the Petitioner: John Heshelman with W oolpert, !no. Petitioner's Presentation: John Heshelman introduced the project. " Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office: He said that he sent the petitioners a letter and that he had no concerns with the replat. Chuck Shupperd, Vectren Energy: He said that he had no comments on the replat. Shirley Hunter, Duke Energy: She said that she had no comment on the replat because the project was IP&L territory. Nick Redden, Carmel Engineering: He said that it was outside of their jurisdiction. Karyn Ryg, DOCS: She said that she had no comments on the replat. Matt Griffin, DOCS: He said that his only comment would be that the six-foot landscape strip wouldn't be necessary if the petitioners don't put parking in the front, but he said that they probably will. Christine Barton-Holmes, DOCS: No additional comments on the replat. ...END... 9:45 a m Docket No. 06110006 Replat: Lots 46B 1 & 2, Little Farms Addition Replat. The applicant seeks approval to divide Lot 46B into two parcels, within the Littie Farms Addition. The site is located north of 104th Street on Ethel Street, and is zoned R3. Filed by Chris Badger of Badger Engineering for First Contact, LLC. Present for the Petitioner: Michael Mergell with R.G. Thomas and Chris Badger with Badger Engineering. Petitioner's Presentation: Chris Badger said that the comments from the comment letters have been addressed. He said that they were making changes to the plat for the lenders and the assessor's office to have simple title. He said that an ingress/egress had been provided for access to the other lot. Greg Hoyes, Hamilton County Surveyor's Office: He said that the comment letter went to Nathan Althouse at Miller Surveying. He said that his only comment is that it should be the County Board of Commissioners instead of the Carmel Board of Works. Chris Badger said that he wasn't sure that it had to go the Board of Commissioners because there was no Right of Way involved in the platting process and no easements being changed. He said that there wouldn't be any involvement by the County.