HomeMy WebLinkAboutCorrespondence
Shestak, Joe
From:Lopez, Alexia K
Sent:Friday, June 27, 2025 5:09 PM
To:Conn, Angelina V; Shestak, Joe
Subject:FW: 220 2nd Ave NW
FYI
From: Holdcraft, Karla <kholdcraft@carmel.in.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2025 4:15 PM
To: Willie Hall <whall@crossroadengineers.com>; Thomas, John G <jthomas@carmel.in.gov>; Lopez, Alexia K
<alopez@carmel.in.gov>
Subject: 220 2nd Ave NW
Hello,
nd
Just letting you know Scott Engleking dropped o? his $6000 drainage/thoroughfare contribution for 220 2 Ave
NW. This is associated with B-2025-00003, PZ-2025-00001, PZ-2025-00002.
Thank you!
Karla Holdcraft
Department of Engineering
City of Carmel
317-571-2437
1
Shestak, Joe
From:Scott Engelking <scottengelking88@gmail.com> on behalf of Scott Engelking
<scott@gvintegration.com>
Sent:Friday, June 6, 2025 10:06 PM
To:Conn, Angelina V
Cc:Shestak, Joe; Thomas, John G; Willie Hall
Subject:Re: 220 2nd Ave NW. Survey was today
Attachments:220 2nd Ave NW Survey.pdf
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
FYI…. I’m attaching the completed survey related to residential building permit B-2025-00003.
I also attached it in your system.
We have pins at all 4 corners of the lot. Also, the survey confirms that we have 25’ of property to the North of our
current house, so there are no issues with our building plans that I can see.
We are locking a contract with the foundation & pavement contractor. We will be pulling the right of way permit
soon and I can stop in to make the payment to the Carmel storm water fund.
I’m not aware of any issues, but please let me know if you disagree.
Thanks!,
Scott
317-997-0549
> On Jun 3, 2025, at 2:23 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> wrote:
>
> Scott - Thank you for this update, related to residential building permit B-2025-00003.
>
> Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator
> Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
> 1 Civic Sq., 3rd Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
> O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Engelking <scottengelking88@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Scott Engelking
> Sent: Tuesday, June 3, 2025 2:20 PM
> To: Shestak, Joe <jshestak@carmel.in.gov>; Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>
> Subject: 220 2nd Ave NW. Survey was today
>
> FYI. The survey was done today. There were no surprises. We have the room we need to do the addition. There
1
N0
°
2
6
'
0
2
"
W
-
6
2
.
0
5
'
N88°57'17"E - 65.02'
S0
°
0
9
'
3
3
"
W
-
6
3
.
1
5
'
S89°55'24"W - 64.36'
66
.
0
0
'
(
D
)
64.60' (D)
66
.
0
0
'
(
D
)
2.1'
0.3'
1.0'
1.9'
2.
0
'
0.
4
'
SC
O
T
T
E
N
G
E
L
K
I
N
G
22
0
2
N
D
A
V
E
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
CA
R
M
E
L
,
I
N
.
4
6
0
3
2
.
/
/
1"
=
1
0
'
KGDS
06
/
0
5
/
2
0
2
5
1
SC
O
T
T
E
N
G
E
L
K
I
N
G
RE
T
R
A
C
E
M
E
N
T
B
O
U
N
D
A
R
Y
S
U
R
V
E
Y
R
Call before you dig.
below.Know what's
Pr
e
p
a
r
e
d
F
o
r
:
SHEET NO:
DA
T
E
:
DR
A
W
N
B
Y
:
CH
E
C
K
E
D
B
Y
:
SC
A
L
E
:
PR
O
J
E
C
T
N
O
:
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
:
Sh
e
e
t
T
i
t
l
e
DA
T
E
:
RE
V
I
S
I
O
N
N
O
:
19
9
0
N
M
e
r
i
d
i
a
n
R
o
a
d
Su
i
t
e
A
GR
E
E
N
F
I
E
L
D
,
I
N
4
6
1
4
0
OF
F
I
C
E
:
3
1
7
-
4
6
2
-
4
0
5
5
Pl
o
t
t
e
d
:
J
u
n
0
5
,
2
0
2
5
-
1
:
5
1
p
m
:
m
w
a
g
n
Dr
a
w
i
n
g
N
a
m
e
:
G
:
\
.
s
h
o
r
t
c
u
t
-
t
a
r
g
e
t
s
-
b
y
-
i
d
\
1
-
8
l
g
N
V
B
0
m
I
X
L
a
S
u
S
E
X
1
_
q
6
J
Y
e
8
Q
T
k
m
C
C
\
M
J
G
i
b
s
o
n
\
H
G
S
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
0
2
5
\
2
5
-
1
9
9
E
n
g
e
l
k
i
n
g
,
S
c
o
t
t
\
2
5
-
1
9
9
E
N
G
E
L
K
I
N
G
.
d
w
g
La
y
t
o
u
t
:
2
4
x
3
6
VICINITY MAP
3RD STREET NORTHWEST
PART OF N.E. 1/4 SECTION 25-T18N-R3E
Clay Township
Hamilton County
Indiana
R
STATE OFLS29300014
E
NIAD
SU R V
L
I
A
ND
N
ETIS
R E G
No.
O RA
Y
D
E
K
E
NNET H G R E GORY G
A
R
R
I
S
ON
25
-
1
9
9
TAMERA MATTINGLY
INSTRUMENT NO. 2011-31373
RETRACEMENT SURVEY
SCOTT & LARA ENGELKING
HUSBAND AND WIFE
0.10 AC ±
"MILLER" CAPPED REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)
SURVEY MARKER SET
(5/8" IRON REBAR)
SURVEY MARKER FOUND
AS NOTED ON PLAT
(POB)
(M)
(D)
MEASURED
POINT OF BEGINNING
DEED
WITH M J GIBSON CAP
LEGEND
BUILDING
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
EASEMENT
(POC)POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
(R)RECORD
SECTION CORNER
SRE SUBJECT REAL ESTATE
I, the undersigned Professional Land Surveyor, do hereby certify that I have conducted an RETRACEMENT SURVEY under my direct supervision that this survey is in
compliance with Title 865, Article 1, Rule 12, of the Indiana Administrative Code and to the best of my professional knowledge, information and belief, this PLAT OF
SURVEY is an accurate representation of that survey of the following described real estate:
LEGAL DESCRIPTION-SURVEYED REAL ESTATE (SRE)
(the following legal description appears of record in a Warranty Deed recorded as Instrument Number 2022035559 in the Office of the Recorder of Hamilton County,
Indiana)
A Part of the Northeast quarter of Section 25, Township 18 North, Range 3 East, described as follows:
Plot Number Four: begin at an iron stake 137.0 feet North and 111.0 feet West of the Southwest corner of Lot Number 11 in the Henry Roberts heir addition to the Town,
now City, of Carmel, Indiana, run thence West 64.6 feet to an iron pin; thence North 66.0 feet to an iron pin, being 77.0 feet South of the South line of 3rd street Northwest;
thence East to an iron pin; thence South 66.0 feet to the place of beginning.
SURVEYOR'S REPORT
In accordance with Title 865, Article 1, Chapter 12, Sections 1 through 30 of the Indiana Administrative Code, the following observations and opinions are submitted
regarding uncertainties in the locations of the lines and corners established this survey as a result of:
-Measurements (Relative Positional Accuracy),
-Availability, Conditions and Integrity of Reference Monuments
-Record Documents, and
-Lines of Occupation
There may be unwritten rights associated with these uncertainties. The client and those listed to whom this survey is certified to, should assume there is an amount of
uncertainty along any line equal in magnitude to the discrepancy in the location of the lines of possession from the surveyed lines. Furthermore, it should be noted that any
survey line and corner established herein based upon section corners is subject to an unknown amount of uncertainty due to the inability to verify if references or
monuments existing at the corners stated are in fact “original corners”. In many instances “original corners” have not been perpetuated or have been lost and the evidence
or monuments now existing are the best evidence of the original corner. Section corners which are not able to be established by physical or other evidence may be
re-established by proportional measurement. Section corners that are not original corners may be classified or considered “Title Corners”. Therefore, as a “Title Corner”
may be affected by undiscovered information or evidence, its' location is subject to change making the uncertainty of a “Title Corner” unknown.
The basis of the bearings is assumed according to the North American Datum of 1983, Indiana East Zone.
Measurements (Relative Positional Precision - RPA)
Relative Positional Precision per NSPS standards means “the length of the semi-major axis, expressed in feet, of the error ellipse representing the uncertainty due to
random errors in measurements in the location of the monument, or witness, marking any corner of the surveyed property relative to the monument, or witness, marking
any other corner of the surveyed property at the 95 percent confidence level. Relative Positional Precision is estimated by the results of a correctly weighted least squares
adjustment of the survey .” “Relative Positional Precision is estimated using statistical means.” Therefore, unless noted otherwise is this report, the Relative Positional
Precision of this survey is 0.07 feet plus 100 parts per million (based upon the direct distance between the two corners being tested) as defined in the stated ALTA/NSPS
standards and a Urban Survey as defined in 865 IAC 1-12-7.
Reference Monuments
The following reference monuments, and Original Corners, were used after considering the availability, condition and integrity of the monuments found OR called for by
record documents to establish the lines and corners of the Surveyed Real Estate:
The monumentation recovered in, and around, the Subject Boundary that was used for the resolution for this survey is as follows:
Miller capped rebar were found and held at the Northeast and Northwest corners of the Subject. A Mag Nail in concrete was found and held at the Southwest corner of the
Subject. A rebar was found (and held for line) 2.0' North of the Southeast corner of the Subject. JD Hall Rebar were found (not shown) at the Northeast and Southeast
corners of Lot 2 as Shown in "Applegate Addition" (Instr. # 2011046806) South of the Subject. A JD Hall Rebar was also found at the Southwest corner of Lot 11 in Henry
Roberts heir addition as shown.
Lines of Occupation
The lines of occupation defined as physical evidence existing the date of the field survey shall be that being visible, obvious, well defined, man-made or placed objects,
such as but not limited to fences, hedges, retaining walls, driveways, walks, landscaping, farming or field division lines or evidence of use of the land by others than the title
holder of the SRE are shown on the survey plat map. The uncertainty shown for a line of occupation, such as a mow line or fence, is general in nature and is NOT specific
for every point along the line. Therefore portions of the occupation and possession line may vary from the surveyed line by a distance greater or less than the uncertainty
noted in this report.
Fences - a Wooden fence was located running at varying distances from the East line of the Subject as shown.
A concrete drive was found to be as much as 2.0' South of the Subject South line. A landscaping line was found to be 0.4' North of the Subject South line.
There is negligible uncertainty due to lines of occupation.
Record Documents
The record deed of the SRE, adjoining deeds and record plat were searched and reviewed for inconsistencies and uncertainties as relating to the lines and corners of the
SRE and none were found.
There is negligible uncertainty due to record documents.
THEORY OF LOCATION
The lines and corners of the SRE have been established based upon field measurements and observations and record documents found in the offices of Hamilton County.
Monuments shown have been verified, reviewed or set as noted. The monuments found were held as shown. Corners were replaced using deeded distances if no
monumentation was recovered. The lines of the subject were drawn as deeded, then rotated to match the orientation of the field datum at the time of the survey.
The Northeast and Northwest corners of the Subject were found and held as "Miller" Capped Rebar. The Southwest corner of the Subject was found and held as a Mag Nail
in concrete as called for at the Northwest corner of Lot 3 in the Plat of Applegate Addition (Instr. # 2011046806). The Southeast corner was calculated by intersecting a line
from the Northeast corner through the rebar that is 2.0' North of the Southeast corner in combination with a line run from the Mag Nail at the Southwest corner to the Mag
Nail to the East as shown on this Survey.
NOTES:
(1)This survey prepared without the benefit of a title insurance commitment, abstract of title or title search. The ownership information indicated hereon is as identified in
the County or Township records. There may be other documents of record that exist which if provided or made available might change the opinion of this surveyor and
the lines and corners of the surveyed premises.
(2)The portrayal on this survey of any potential boundary line conflicts either by occupation lines or record descriptions does not infer any right by any property owner to
try to occupy such areas nor disturb existing occupation lines. An attorney and/or title company should be consulted concerning any such conflicts.
(3)The survey was made on the ground during the month of June, 2025. The lines and corners established by this survey are subject to change upon additional evidence
being found or provided to further define points used in the decisions made herein.
(4)The locations of utility lines shown hereon are based upon information from plans and markings on the ground or visible evidence. However, lacking excavation, the
exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is
advised that excavation may be necessary.
(5)I affirm under the penalties of perjury that I have taken reasonable care to redact each Social Security number in this document, unless required by law.
(6)Prepared by Greg Garrison.
CERTIFIED: June 5, 2025
___________________________________________________________
KENNETH GREGORY GARRISON REGISTERED
LAND SURVEYOR, RLS29300014
"MILLER" CAPPED REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)
"MILLER" CAPPED REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
ILLEGIBLE CAPPED REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)
REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
2.0' NORTH OF CORNER
"FOSTER BLS" CAPPED REBAR FOUND
0.3' BELOW SURFACE
2.0' SOUTH OF LINE
MAG NAIL FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)MAG NAIL FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)
"JD HALL" CAPPED REBAR FOUND
AT SURFACE
AT CORNER (HELD)
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 11
HENRY ROBERTS HEIR ADDITION
EMMA TILLMAN
INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-58194
JAMES S & DONA L RICE
INSTRUMENT NO. 2022-32243
2N
D
A
V
E
N
U
E
N
O
R
T
H
W
E
S
T
were pins at all 4 corners of the lot. I’m getting concrete contractors lined up to do the concrete foundation work
and pull the right of way cut permit. I’ll attach the survey when I get I get it.
>
> I can write the check into the storm water fund once we confirm that we’re all aligned on the project.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Scott
> 317-997-0549
>
> Sent from my iPhone
2
Shestak, Joe
From:Conn, Angelina V
Sent:Friday, February 14, 2025 1:53 PM
To:Scott Engelking
Cc:Lara Engelking; Shestak, Joe; Mindham, Daren
Subject:RE: Updated packet, with the tree called out in the yard
Thanks, Scott – And, Daren will be back in the office on Monday, but I have a feeling he is going to recommend a
2.5-inch caliper tree. Have a nice weekend.
Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator
Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
rd
1 Civic Sq., 3 Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
From: Scott Engelking <scottengelking88@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Scott Engelking
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2025 12:36 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>
Cc: Lara Engelking <engelking@engelkinglaw.com>; Shestak, Joe <jshestak@carmel.in.gov>; Mindham, Daren
<dmindham@carmel.in.gov>
Subject: Re: Updated packet, with the tree called out in the yard
Thanks. I think they are commonly called Honey Locust or Japanese Honey Locust.
Can you or Daren let us know what trunk size is required? We have one in the yard now that is about 2.5”
trunk. It’s a really nice tree that we can move over to the spot you recommended. I’m just not sure if it’s
big enough to be considered a medium tree. It’s got a great shape
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 14, 2025, at 10:19 AM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> wrote:
Thank you for working with us, Scott.
Also, I consulted with the City’s Urban Forester, and he asked you to confirm that the tree will be a
Honey Locust or what the specific species will be. (He said there is no such thing as a Japanese
locust.) Thanks!
Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator
Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
rd
1 Civic Sq., 3 Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
1
Shestak, Joe
From:Conn, Angelina V
Sent:Thursday, February 13, 2025 10:04 AM
To:Scott Engelking
Cc:Shestak, Joe; Lara Engelking
Subject:RE: Copies of Notarized Documents for 220 2nd Ave NW
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
Good morning, Sco?: Yes that is okay to do, and we can also add it as a recommended condi?on of variance approval.
Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
1 Civic Sq., 3rd Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Sco? Engelking <sco?engelking88@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Sco? Engelking
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2025 9:54 AM
To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>
Cc: Shestak, Joe <jshestak@carmel.in.gov>; Lara Engelking <engelking@engelkinglaw.com>
Subject: Re: Copies of Notarized Documents for 220 2nd Ave NW
Thanks Angie,
Regarding the landscaping comment…..
Is it ok to update the package to say that we will comply with this? I can have our architect add a landscape plan to his
drawings that will be done in early March. And we can confirm now in the variance package that we’ll have a shade tree
that complies. The issue is that we don’t have a landscape plan right now now and I’m not sure that I could get it done
by the deadline. I agree its needed, but it does not seem to me like it is a must for this phase since its not related to our
variances and we don’t have the detailed drawings for the rest of the house done right now either, Please let me know if
that will work.
Sco?
1
Shestak, Joe
From:Conn, Angelina V
Sent:Thursday, February 6, 2025 8:24 AM
To:Scott Engelking
Cc:Lara Engelking; Shestak, Joe; Shestak, Joe
Subject:RE: Info For Variance Process (App PZ-2025-00003) (Updated January 23rd) (220 2nd
Ave NW)
Follow Up Flag:Follow up
Flag Status:Completed
Perfect. Thank you for making that change.
Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator
Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
rd
1 Civic Sq., 3 Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
From: Scott Engelking <scottengelking88@gmail.com> On Behalf Of Scott Engelking
Sent: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 3:43 PM
To: Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov>
Cc: Lara Engelking <engelking@engelkinglaw.com>; Shestak, Joe <jshestak@carmel.in.gov>; Shestak, Joe
<jshestak@carmel.in.gov>
Subject: Re: Info For Variance Process (App PZ-2025-00003) (Updated January 23rd) (220 2nd Ave NW)
Hi Angie,
It would be 17’ 8” if we were 1 foot back. We have no issue making it 18’ if that is a requirement.
Thanks,
Scott
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 5, 2025, at 4:15 PM, Conn, Angelina V <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> wrote:
Hi Scott - If your garage face is moving closer to the street, then what will the new driveway length
be (from the garage face out to the sidewalk)? We do not want a vehicle to encroach into the
sidewalk area when parked. (We typically ask for a minimum of an 18-ft long driveway, when
measured from the garage face out to the sidewalk. That coincides with the UDO Parking
Standards.) Please let me know. Thank you.
Angie Conn, AICP - Planning Administrator
Carmel Planning/Zoning Division, DOCS
rd
1 Civic Sq., 3 Flr., Carmel, IN 46202
O: 317.571.2417 W: carmeldocs.com
1