The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondencePlan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 1 1 Addressing Dave McCoy 9/19/22 11:41 AM Comment The southernmost building in this development could be addressed off Old Meridian St, but it might be better for the street coming off Old Meridian St to be named and the building addressed off that street. Please contact me to discuss. Info Only 2 1 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 9/19/22 12:55 PM Comment Please include any Proposed signage for this Development for review. Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 6/5/23 11:34 AM A Sign Package will be required before any signs are approved for this project. An ADLS Amend filing will be required when ready. This should include any directional or incidental signage. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:48 AM I believe this comment has been resolved. We are not proposing any signage with this permit. A signage permit will be submitted at a later date. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:10 PM There is no proposed signage with this permit. We will be providing that at a later date. Info Only 3 1 Building & Code Services Mike Sheeks 9/19/22 11:06 PM Comment Do you have a proposed elevation drawing? Thank you, Mike S. Responded by: Chad James - 6/12/23 7:05 AM I believe this comment has been resolved ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 3/24/23 12:56 PM I believe this comment has been resolved ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 1:28 PM We have uploaded the most current building elevations from the architect. Resolved REVIEW COMMENTS Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 4 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:24 AM Comment Two Fire Department Connections are shown on plans. CFD was not made aware that two fire department connections are needed for project during previous meetings. Designer needs to contact Fire Marshal Lucas Ray to discuss the need for two FDC's. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM We have removed the second FDC from the plans. The proposed building (apartments, retail, and condos) will be served by one (1) FDC. Please refer to the Site Utility Plan for exact location. Resolved 5 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:24 AM Comment PIV's are required on all fire mains leading into buildings. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:09 PM We are showing a proposed PIV on the fire main right before it enters the building. Please refer to the Site Utility Plan for exact location. Resolved 6 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:28 AM Comment Submit a full set of hard copy 1/2 scale plans to CFD for review and comment. The plans can be delivered to: Carmel Fire Dept. 10701 N. College Ave Indianapolis, IN 46280 Attn: Plan Review Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:09 PM A full set of hard copy 1/2 scale plans were sent to address indicated on 12/20/2022 Resolved 7 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:29 AM Comment Submit an emergency vehicle circulation auto turn plan demonstrating fire apparatus can drive and turn around on the fire apparatus access road on the south end of the project. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:09 PM An autoturn exhibit demonstrating that a fire apparatus can drive and turn around on the fire apparatus access road on the south end of the project has been submitted. Resolved 8 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:36 AM Comment Section 3312.1 Fire Hydrants shall be fully functional tested and approved prior to any combustible materials arriving on the construction site. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:09 PM This note has been added to the Overall Project General Notes on Sheet C0.1, Note #17 Info Only 9 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:38 AM Comment Section 3310.1 Required Fire Department Vehicle Access. Approved asphalt/concrete fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to and through the construction site during construction. Fire Apparatus access road must be capable of supporting the weight of fire apparatus and maintained clear at all times. The west and south fire department vehicle access roads shall be installed and fully functional prior to vertical construction. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:10 PM This note has been added to the Overall Project General Notes on Sheet C0.1, Note #16 Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 10 1 Fire Carmel Fire 9/20/22 8:41 AM Comment 3313.1 Where required. In buildings required to have standpipes by Section 905.3.1, not less than one standpipe shall be provided for use during construction. The general contractor shall contact Fire Marshal Lucas Ray to discuss the location and timing of Standpipe installation. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:10 PM Stand pipes will be provided during construction. These are shown on the MEP plans. It has been noted that the contractor will contact Fire Marshal Lucas Ray to discuss the location and tiing of standpipe installation. Info Only 11 1 Vectren Energy Chad Miller 9/20/22 8:45 AM Changemark CenterPoint Energy Please have the owner or developer call the new service center asap to have the existing gas services and meters retired before the demo begins. Protect any existing gas main or service that will not be retired during demo and construction phases. Will the new buildings have gas? If they do, CenterPoint Energy will need load information to size the meters. Also we will need a AutoCAD file. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Info Only 12 1 Carmel Information Systems Morgan Rinehart 9/21/22 8:59 AM Comment Please show which of the existing City fiber connection points will used for fiber to the parking garage IT Room for camera feeds. Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:57 AM I believe this comment has been resolved. Can we get this comment changed in projectdox? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 6/12/23 7:06 AM I believe this comment has been resolved ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 3/24/23 12:57 PM I believe this comment has been resolved ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 1:29 PM We have revised the plans to show the proposed fiber optic line connecting to the City's line and running to the building. Please refer to the Site Utility Plan for general alignment (northeast corner of the building) Info Only 13 1 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 9/26/22 11:37 AM Comment Pending CRC review of architectural plans. Thank you. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 14 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:04 PM Changemark Short term bicycle parking - retail Section 5.29 of the City's UDO requires short term bicycle parking to be provided at a rate of 2 spaces (1 rack) for every 5,000 square feet of retail space. Revise the plans to include at least the minimum number of required bicycle parking spaces to comply with the UDO. The City's bicycle standards require bike racks to be an inverted-U or A-frame rack that are to be installed within 50' of the main entrance(s) of the building. For buildings with multiple tenants bike racks may be dispersed throughout the site to provide accessible and convenient bicycle parking for all of the tenants. Please refer to section 5.29 of the City's UDO for more information. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:49 AM We have coordinated with David Littlejohn on the "Bicycle Parking Exhibit" found in the files/architectural drawings folder. Per email on 3/20/2023, the plan has been approved. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/8/23 6:39 AM We will follow up up with this information shortly Resolved 15 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:04 PM Changemark short term bicycle parking - multifamily Section 5.29 of the City's UDO requires short term bicycle parking to be provided at a rate of 0,1 spaces for every bedroom in the multifamily building(s). Revise the plans to include at least the minimum number of required bicycle parking spaces to comply with the UDO. The City's bicycle standards require bike racks to be an inverted-U or A-frame rack that are to be installed within 50' of the main entrance(s) of the building. For buildings with multiple tenants bike racks may be dispersed throughout the site to provide accessible and convenient bicycle parking for all of the tenants. Please refer to section 5.29 of the City's UDO for more information. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:51 AM We have coordinated with David Littlejohn on the "Bicycle Parking Exhibit" found in the files/architectural drawings folder. Per email on 3/20/2023, the plan has been approved. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/8/23 6:39 AM We will follow up up with this information shortly Resolved 16 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:04 PM Changemark long term bicycle - multifamily Section 5.29 of City's UDO encourages long term bicycle parking for multifamily developments at a rate of 0.5 spaces for every bedroom in units without a personal garage. If this is already planned to be included with this project please provide details on how it will be provided. Please refer to section 5.29 of the City's UDO for more information on long term bicycle parking. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:51 AM We have coordinated with David Littlejohn on the "Bicycle Parking Exhibit" found in the files/architectural drawings folder. Per email on 3/20/2023, the plan has been approved. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/8/23 6:39 AM We will follow up up with this information shortly Resolved 17 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:05 PM Changemark long term bicycle parking - retail Section 5.29 of City's UDO encourages long term bicycle parking for multifamily developments at a rate of 1 space for every 12,000 sq ft of retail space. If this is already planned to be included with this project please provide details on how it will be provided. Please refer to section 5.29 of the City's UDO for more information on long term bicycle parking. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:51 AM We have coordinated with David Littlejohn on the "Bicycle Parking Exhibit" found in the files/architectural drawings folder. Per email on 3/20/2023, the plan has been approved. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/8/23 6:39 AM We will follow up up with this information shortly Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 18 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:08 PM Changemark Bicycle parking details Add bicycle parking to the site improvement keynotes to indicate where bicycle parking will be included throughout the site. Please provide a detail for the short term bicycle parking and the long term bicycle parking that will be included with this project. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:51 AM We have coordinated with David Littlejohn on the "Bicycle Parking Exhibit" found in the files/architectural drawings folder. Per email on 3/20/2023, the plan has been approved. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/8/23 6:39 AM We will follow up up with this information shortly Resolved 19 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:17 PM Changemark Off-Street Trail The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan indicates a proposed off street trail in this approximate location. Please revise the plans to include this trail to comply with the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:55 AM This variance was approved in the BZA hearing on 3/27/2023 ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM We have revised the plans to provide an off-street trail connecting Main Street to the south property line of the development. A variance request has been submitted to reduce the width of the off-street path to a 5' wide sidewalk. Resolved 20 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:19 PM Changemark Sidewalk connection/crosswalk Revise the plans to include an ADA compliant accessible route/sidewalk connection from the interior sidewalk to the sidewalk along the south side of the building leading to the path along Old Meridian. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM An ADA compliant accessible route has been provided from the interior sidewalk to the sidewalk along the south side of the building leading to the path along Old Meridian. Please refer to Sheet C1.2 for proposed alignment. Resolved 21 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:20 PM Changemark Sidewalk connection/crosswalk 2 Revise the plans to include an ADA compliant accessible route/sidewalk connection from the interior sidewalk to the pass through sidewalk between the two buildings. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM An ADA compliant accessible route has been provided from the interior sidewalk to the pass through sidewalk between the two buildings. Please refer to Sheet C 1.2 for proposed alignment. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 22 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:25 PM Changemark Urban Commercial Sidewalk The City's bicycle and pedestrian plan requires a 12 ft wide Urban Commercial sidewalk for new developments along Old Meridian. at this location. Revise the plans to include a 12 ft sidewalk along the project's entire Old Meridian frontage. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:56 AM This variance was approved in the BZA hearing on 3/27/2023 ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM We have requested a variance to allow for a 10' wide path instead of a 12' wide path. Resolved 23 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:26 PM Changemark Ramp alignment Revise this ramp to ensure that it provides a straight crossing to the ramp on the opposite side and that it complies with ADA standards. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM We have updated the ramp location to provide a straight crossing to the ramp on the opposite side. Please refer to Sheet C1.2 for proposed alignment. Resolved 24 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:27 PM Changemark Stop bar location Move this stop bar so that it aligns with the stop sign and so that it does not conflict with the crosswalk across the drive. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM The stop bar location has been updated so that it does not conflict with the crosswalk across the draive. Refer to Sheet C1.2 Resolved 25 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 2:31 PM Changemark ADA parking in the garage Please ensure that the parking garage will provide enough ADA parking spaces to comply with ADA standards. Revise the plans to show where all of the ADA parking and its accessible route(s) will be located in the garage. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:11 PM We have confirmed that we are provided enough ADA parking spaces to comply with ADA standards. We are providing two near the retail on the west side of the development. There are also two ADA spaces on each floor of the garage to give us a total of 12 parking spaces. Per ADA requirements for 502 spaces, we are required to provide 12. Please refer to Sheet C1.2 for the three (3)ADA parking space locations on the first floor of the garage and throughout the site. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 26 1 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 9/27/22 3:17 PM Changemark Stop bar location 2 Move this stop bar so that it aligns with the stop sign and so that it does not conflict with the crosswalk across the drive. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:12 PM The stop bar location has been updated so that it does not conflict with the crosswalk across the draive. Refer to Sheet C1.2 Resolved 27 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please provide a legal description of site on the cover sheet Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM A legal description has been added to the cover sheet. Resolved 28 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please submit a storm water management permit application Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM A stormwater management permit application was submitted on 12/1/2022 Resolved 29 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please provide all technical information required by Section 102.02(xi)(m) of the Storm Water Technical Standards on the grading plan Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM A drainage summary has been provided on the Grading Plan (Sheet C1.3). Resolved 30 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that there are no direct discharge areas Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM A variance request has been submitted to allow for the 0.06 acres of grass on the development to continue drainaing to the exsiting detention basin southeast of the development. Resolved 31 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please clearly show the construction limits on all sheets with plan view (not required on profile sheets) Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM We have revised the viewport of the plans to show the construction limits on all sheets with plan view. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 32 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that all elevations are North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD) Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:53 PM We have verified that all elevations are North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD). Resolved 33 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that the horizontal datum of topgraphic map is Indiana State Plane Coordinates, NAD83 Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:56 PM We have verified that the horizontal datum of topographic map is Indiana State Plane Coordinates, NAD83. Resolved 34 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of existing utilities with top of curb and invert elevations, pipe sizes, and direction are shown Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:56 PM We have verified that the locations of existing utilities with top of curb and invert elevations, pipe sizes, and direction are shown on the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C1.0). Resolved 35 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that all existing culverts, pipes, and bridges on existing drives or under the roadway are shown indicating size, type, and invert elevations Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:56 PM We have verified that all existing culverts, pipes, and bridges are shown in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C1.0) Resolved 36 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 11:04 AM Library Comment Please verify that the locations of all existing electrical power vaults, transformers, power lines, gas lines, television cable , and telephone lines are shown Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:56 PM We have verified that the locations of all existing electrical power vaults, transformers, power lines, gas lines, television cable, and telephone lines are shown in the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C1.0). Resolved 37 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 1:33 PM Changemark Please show all initial stormwater controls necessary for demolition on this sheet or provide an initial SWPPP sheet with the next submittal We will need to see perimeter protection, inlet protection, construction entrance, etc. C1.1 Demolition Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:56 PM A Pre-Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Sheet has been added to the Construction Documents. Please refer to Sheet C1.6 Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 38 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 1:33 PM Changemark Board of Public Works approval required for closures/restrictions BPW approval will be required for any roadway or sidewalk closures/restrictions. A request letter will need to be provided with the next submittal requesting these items. C1.1 Demolition Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:05 PM A request letter has been provided with the submittal. Resolved 39 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 1:33 PM Changemark Please provide a pedestrian maintenance of traffic with the next submittal A maintenance of traffic was provided for the road closure but we will need one provided for the duration of when the path is removed. C1.1 Demolition Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:05 PM A pedestrian maintenance of traffic for the duration of when the path is removed has been provided with this submittal. Please refer to sheet C3.1 Resolved 40 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 2:21 PM Changemark The entrances will need to be installed per our standards commercial entrance detail Please revise the section of the entrance within the City's right-of-way to conform with standard drawing 10-22. This detail will also need to be provided in the plans. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:05 PM The section of the entrance within the City's right-of- way has been revised to conform with Standard Drawing 10-22. The detail has been provided in the plans on Sheet C8.3. A Variance has been requested for the 20' curb radius on the northeast entrance of the project site. Resolved 41 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 2:21 PM Changemark 60' half right-of-way required Per the Transportation Plan, this section of Main Street is classified as a parkway arterial street and requires a full right-of-way width of 120'. A 60' half will need to be dedicated with this project. Please show this on the next submittal. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM A variance request has been submitted to allow for a 40' half right-of-way instead of a 60' half right of way. Resolved 42 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 2:21 PM Changemark Multi-use path and urban commercial sidewalk required along frontage Per the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Map in the Transportation Plan, the proposed concrete sidewalk will need to be revised. A 10' asphalt multi-use path will be required along the Main Street frontage and an urban commercial sidewalk is required along the Old Meridian frontage. Please revise. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM A variance request has been submitted to allow for a 10' concrete multi-use path instead of a 10' asphalt multi- use path. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 43 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/28/22 2:21 PM Changemark A proposed off-street trail is shown in this location on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Map This will need to be provided per the Transportation Plan. Please revise the plans to show this. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM We have revised the plans to provide an off-street trail connecting Main Street to the south property line of the development. A variance request has been submitted to reduce the width of the off-street path to a 5' wide sidewalk. Resolved 44 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 9:33 AM Changemark The drainage from this portion of the site is being direct to the adjacent property The site is being pushed onto the adjacent property and directly towards the existing building which sits lower than this site. Please revise the grading on the property line or install storm inlets to collect the drainage. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM There is a swale diverting a portion of stormwater runoff to the proposed storm infrastructure. The remaining portion of drainage from that site is flowing into the existing detention basin just east of the property boundary. A variance request has been submitted to allow for the 0.06 acres to directly discharge into the existing detention basin. Resolved 45 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:06 AM Changemark The building elevations on these buildings need to be revised The finished floors and flood protection grades for these buildings are only 0.1' to 0.2' above the local flooding source. We require these elevations for to 1' above the ponding. Please revise. C1.5 Emergency Flood Route Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM The site is too tight to make this requirement work. We've graded the areas to lower the ponding elevations as much as possible but we need to maintain ADA slopes in the plaza and courtyard areas. In doing so we are not able to meet the 1' requirement. We have submitted a variance for this request. Resolved 46 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:06 AM Changemark These elevations will need to be raised above the proposed ponding in the courtyards These elevations will need to be 1' above the ponding in the courtyards. C1.5 Emergency Flood Route Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the ponding elevations 1’ below the finished floor elevations. We have submitted a variance for this request. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 47 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:26 AM Changemark Please show the limits of the underground detention on this and all other sheets dealing with drainage C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:06 PM We have updated the underground detention linework to be darker and show up with all other sheets dealing with drainage. Resolved 48 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:26 AM Changemark Please clearly call out each type of BMP and their sizes Please also show the BMP easement and access easements on this sheet. C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM The BMPs have been called out on Sheet C1.7. A 20' access easement has been added from the R/W to the BMPs. Resolved 49 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:26 AM Changemark Please provide inlet protection on this inlet C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM Inlet protection has been provided on the specified inlet. Please refer the sheet C1.7. Resolved 50 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:26 AM Changemark Where will this be installed? We are unable to locate this on the plan sheet C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM There are no native planting areas proposed for the site. The hatch has been removed from Sheet C 1.7 Resolved 51 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:26 AM Changemark Please provide erosion control blanket on this slope C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM Erosion Control blanket has been added to this area. Please refer to Sheet C1.7. Resolved 52 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:27 AM Changemark Please extend the construction entrance to be 150' long C1.6 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM The construction entrance has been revised to show 150 feet long. Please refer to sheets C1.6 and C1.7 Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 53 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 11:32 AM Changemark If any floor drains are proposed within the garage, they will need to be directed to the sanitary system rather than the storm C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM This has been noted. Design team has confirmed that the floor drains within the garage will be directed to the sanitary sewer system. Resolved 54 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 1:36 PM Changemark Is an appropriate amount of room provided for vehicles to pass here? C3.0 Maintenance of Traffic Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:07 PM There is approximately 10' of space being provided for vehicles to pass. Resolved 55 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 1:38 PM Changemark Please provide the hydraulic grade line on the profiles C6.0 Storm Plan and Profile.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM The hydraulic grade line has been added to the profiles on the Storm Plan & Profile Sheets. Resolved 56 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 1:43 PM Changemark We require a minimum of 150' construction entrances, please revise C8.1 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Details.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM The construction entrance detail has been revised. Resolved 57 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 2:06 PM Changemark Please provide a detail for the water quality diversion structure Please provide this in the plans and the O&M C8.3 Construction Details.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM The StormTrap Site Saver Water Quality Units are online units, can handle 32.0 cfs, and do not need to incorporate a diversion structure (confirmed by stormtrap themselves). The diversion structure for the Aqua-Swirl is a standard manhole with one outflow pipe raised higher than the invert in to divert the first inch of rainfall to the aqua-swirl. The storm plan and profiles has this pipe called out for reference. Resolved 58 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 2:31 PM Changemark What is the TSS removal rate for the "Site Saver"? C8.9 Construction Details.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM The site saver has been designed to provide a removal rate of 92%. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 59 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 2:43 PM Changemark Please provide the City's owner acknowledgement agreement in the O&M The BMPs for the site will need to be listed on the lines provided. I have uploaded this document to the correspondence folder. Old Meridian and Main O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM The City's owner acknowledgement agreement has been provided in the O&M Manual. Resolved 60 1 Engineering Alex Jordan 9/29/22 2:43 PM Changemark Please show the BMP and access easement on the site map Old Meridian and Main O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 4/18/23 11:07 AM We have renamed the easement to be called out as BMP and Access Easement ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Alex Jordan - 2/27/23 3:10 PM Thank you for showing the easement but please have it labeled as a BMP easement as well. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 4:08 PM A 20' access easement has been added from the R/W to the BMP. Resolved 61 1 Urban Forestry Daren Mindham 9/30/22 10:09 AM Comment No landscape plans uploaded. I will wait till next review cycle for landscape plan review. Info Only 62 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 3:46 PM Changemark 102.02.v.d Please note that site does not lie within SFHA. C1.0 Existing Conditions.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM This note has been added to the Existing Conditions Plan (Sheet C1.0). Resolved 63 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 3:48 PM Changemark 102.02.vii Plan and Profile Sheet(s) shall include the hydraulic grade line indicated on the profiles to demonstrate that the hydraulic grade line remains below the rim elevation for the design condition. Please include Section 102.02.vii statement on all P&P sheets. C6.0 Storm Plan and Profile.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM The hydraulic grade line has been added to the profiles on the Storm Plan & Profile Sheets. The statement in Section 102.02.vii of the City of Carmel Storm Water Technical Standards Manual has been added to all Storm Plan & Profile Sheets. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 64 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 3:51 PM Changemark 102.02.xi Please include all information on the Grading and Drainage plan required per 102.02.xi. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 4/18/23 10:45 AM We have added information to suffice Section 102.02.xi a, d, g, h, j, and q. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/2/23 1:30 PM Please refer to Ref #125-131. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM All the information required per 102.02.xi of the City of Carmel Stormwater Technical Standards Manual has been provided on the Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet. Resolved 65 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 3:55 PM Changemark 102.02.xiv The construction plans shall include a Structure Data Table, and, at a minimum, shall include the following information: structure number reference, upstream structure number, downstream structure number, top casting elevation, upstream pipe elevation, downstream pipe elevation, pipe length, pipe material, pipe size, type of structure and detail reference to type of structure and any notes related to the structure. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM We have added structure data tables to the construction plans. The sanitary structure data table is located on Sheet C4.0. The storm sewer structure data table is located on Sheet C6.4. Resolved 66 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.ii.e&f The stormwater drainage technical report needs to include in the summary report the proposed design of the drainage control system. Please summarize information pertinent to outlet orifices, critical elevations, detention volume required/provided, 48 hour drawdown, and emergency spillway. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM The requested information has been included in the Drainage Report. Resolved 67 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.ii.h The stormwater drainage technical report needs to include in the summary report a narrative and photographic record of the condition of the downstream receiving system and a report of the expected impact of the developmentâ??s stormwater runoff or any receiving stream or downstream property. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM The Drainage Report now includes a narrative and photographic record of the condition of the downstream receiving system, and expected impacts of the development's stormwater runoff. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 68 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.i.a Please include offsite drainage reports for watersheds that are routed through the site including, but not limited to: The Signature, Main St west of the roundabout and portion of Old Meridian north and south of roundabout, developments north of Main St between US 31 and Old Meridian that are routed through the 48" RCP. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:48 PM We have updated appendix G in the drainage report to show the drainage area/calculations, confirm that the 48-inch pipe can convey the existing stormwater runoff, and that the existing channel can convey the stormwater runoff to the existing 42-inch pipe downstream of the development. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 4:02 PM The detention basin was part of the St Vincent parking lot expansion and does not detain all of the runoff from the NW corner of the intersection. Alex Jordan has uploaded the drainage report for that project and the Olivia development on the SW corner along Main Street to be referenced. Please provide calculations evaluating all of the runoff contributing to the proposed 48 inch pipe and provide calculations showing that the downstream 42" pipe has sufficient capacity for all of the proposed flow. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM We have coordinated with the City of Carmel. They do not have the drainage report for the detention basin and 48-inch storm pipe that runs from the northwest side of the roundabout and discharges to the existing ditch along main street. We have obtained drainage reports for Rosewalk on Main (Appendix C) and The Signature (Appendix G). Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 69 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.i.b Please include Watershed map showing that all off-site acreage draining through the site is accommodated, including the fully developed right-of- way per the City of Carmel Thoroughfare Plan. Please also make note of any areas to be directly discharge and show that those are subtracted from the detention allowable release rate. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:49 PM We have revised the detention calculations to include half of the ROW on Old Meridian, half of the ROW on Main Street and a quarter of the round-a-bout. This appears to be coincide with the calculations that were done for the Signature and Oliva on Main with their respective drainage reports. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 9:47 AM Only half of the right of way is included in the proposed basin map, none of the roundabout is included. please revise. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM The Proposed Basin Map and relevant calculations have been revised to include the fully-developed right-of- way per the City of Carmel Thoroughfare Plan. Resolved 70 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.i.c.ii the stormwater drainage technical report needs to include in the detention calculations the critical pond elevations, including top bank and spillway elevations. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM The critical pond elevations have been added to the narrative of the drainage report. Resolved 71 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.i.d.xii Please include full flow velocity 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM The full flow velocity can be found in the Rational Method Storm Sewer Calculations in Appendix E of the Drainage Report. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 72 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:20 PM Changemark 102.03.i.d Please include calculations for offsite bypass 48" RCP on north side of site. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:51 PM We have updated the storm sewer pipe along Main street to a 48-inch pipe. a hydraulic analysis has been conducted and can be reviewed in Appendix G of the drainage report. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 4:04 PM The bypass pipe shall be 48", at a minimum, the same size as the upstream pipe to which it is being connected. Please conduct a full hydraulic analysis of the upstream contributary area to said bypass pipe. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM Calculations for the offsite bypass 42" RCP on the north side of the site have been included in Appendix G of the Drainage Report. Please note, that the drainage report for the roundabout was not found. Some assumptions were made regarding the area draining to the detention basin located on the northwest corner of the round-a- bout. Resolved 73 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:22 PM Changemark 102.03.ii.i The stormwater drainage technical report needs to include in the summary report Identification of any other State or Federal water quality permits that are required for construction activities associated with the ownerâ??s project site. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:48 PM A statement has been added to the Introduction Section of the Drainage Report. The only required permit is the IDEM CSGP Resolved 74 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:25 PM Changemark 102.03.iii.b Hydrologic and hydraulic computations should be included in the submittal. These calculations should include, but are not limited to the following: runoff calculations, stage-discharge relationships, and storage volumes. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM All hydrologic and hydraulic computations have been included in Appendix D of the Drainage Report. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 75 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:45 PM Changemark 104.02 The buildingâ??s lowest entry elevation that is adjacent to and facing a road shall be a minimum of 12 inches above the road elevation. Please include MFPG on this sheet. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM With the building taking up majority of the site at one elevation, we are not able to meet this requirement on the northeast corner of the site. We have submitted a variance for this request. Resolved 76 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:48 PM Changemark 302.06.1 Detention facilities shall be designed in such a manner that a minimum 90% of the original detention capacity is restored within 48 hours from the start of the design 100-year storm. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM The detention facility is designed to meet this requirement. Please refer to Appendix D of the Drainage Report for the 48hr detention storage restoration ICPR results. Resolved 77 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:48 PM Changemark 302.06.2 The 100-year elevation of stormwater detention facilities shall be separated by not less than 25 feet from any building or structure to be occupied. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM With the underground detention facility being placed underneath the proposed parking garage, we are not able to meet this requirement. A variance has been submitted for this request. Resolved 78 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 4:57 PM Changemark 302.06.10 Detention basins, assumed full to the 100-year water surface elevation or the emergency overflow weir elevation, whichever is higher, shall be placed within a common area either platted or legally described and recorded as a perpetual stormwater easement. A minimum of fifteen (15) feet horizontally from the top of bank of the facility, or the 100-year pool if no defined top of bank is present, shall be dedicated as permanent stormwater easement if the above-noted boundary of the common area does not extend that far. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM Utilizing an underground detention facility under the proposed parking garage, we are not able to meet this requirement. We have submitted a variance for this request. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 79 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:06 PM Changemark 302.06.11 Detention basins shall be designed with an additional ten (10) percent of available capacity to allow for sediment accumulation resulting from development and to permit the pond to function for reasonable periods between cleanings. Basins should be designed to collect sediment and debris in specific locations, such as a forebay, so that removal costs are kept to a minimum. For wet-bottom ponds, the sediment allowance may be provided below the permanent pool elevation. No construction trash or debris shall be allowed to be placed within the permanent pool. If the pond is used as a sediment control measure during active construction, the performance sureties will not be released until sediment has been cleaned out of the pond and elevations and grades have been re-established as noted in the accepted plans. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM The detention facility is designed to meet this requirement. When the 100YR storm event maximum volume is stored in the underground detention basin, there is still an additional 15% of available capacity to allow for sediment accumulation. Please refer to Appendix D of the Drainage Report for ICPR Storage Volume Results. Resolved 80 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:06 PM Changemark 302.06.12 Detention basins shall be sized to detain the runoff from the fully developed right-of-way per the City of Carmel 20-year Thoroughfare Plan across all frontages, regardless of existing watershed boundaries or drainage breaks/divides. The acreage of the full right-of-way width shall be included in the overall acreage of the development in determining the allowable release rate. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:51 PM We have revised the detention calculations to include half of the ROW on Old Meridian, half of the ROW on Main Street and a quarter of the round-a-bout. This appears to be coincide with the calculations that were done for the Signature and Oliva on Main with their respective drainage reports. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 10:04 AM Please refer to Ref #69 response. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:49 PM The Proposed Basin Map and relevant calculations have been revised to include the fully-developed right-of- way per the City of Carmel Thoroughfare Plan. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 81 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:09 PM Changemark 302.11 Please include Emergency Overflow calculations per 302.11. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 4/18/23 10:46 AM The overflow elevation is for the water going over the weir, not the water that is in the stormtrap system. The max stage for the water in the stormtrap system will be at 847.99. This elevation will generate a flowrate of 40.61 cfs coming out of the 24" outlet pipe. The water surface elevation over the weir will be at 850.18. This is 1.82' below the parking garage surface elevation ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 10:11 AM Please confirm that the overflow elevation of 850.94 will be below the structure lid by providing OCS detail. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM Emergency Spillway calculations have been provided in Appendix D of the Drainage Report. Resolved 82 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:17 PM Changemark 303.02 Please verify that this channel can accommodate, as a minimum, peak runoff from a 10-year return frequency storm calculated based on methodology described in Section 201.02. If the channel has a capacity of more than 30 cfs at bank-full stage shall be capable of accommodating peak runoff for a 50- year return frequency storm within the drainage easement. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:53 PM We have verified that the existing channel can accommodate peak runoff from a 10-year return frequency. The channel analysis can be found in Appendix G of the drainage report. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 4:05 PM This comment will remain unresolved pending the full evaluation of the upstream watershed. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM We have verified that the existing channel can accommodate peak runoff from a 10-year return frequency storm. Open Channel Calculations can be found in Appendix E of the Drainage Report. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 83 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:17 PM Changemark 303.04 Please provide off-site development drainage report to verify existing pipes have adequate capacity. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:54 PM Please refer to Appendix G for revised off-site drainage calculations. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 10:27 AM Please refer to Ref #139. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM We have added Appendix G to the drainage report. This section provides information for the off-site storm pipes and assumptions that were made during the analysis. Resolved 84 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:22 PM Changemark 303.07 MFPG and FFE shall be minimum of 1' above the local ponding elevation. C1.5 Emergency Flood Route Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the ponding elevations 1’ below the finished floor elevations. We have submitted a variance for this request. Resolved 85 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:22 PM Changemark 303.07 Based on proposed elevations on grading plan, the ponding would be exceed the adjacent grade at the edge of the property behind the inlet. Ponding shall remain within the limits of the development and not encroach adjacent properties C1.5 Emergency Flood Route Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 4/18/23 11:05 AM We have revised the proposed grading to ensure that all ponding will be contained on site and remain within the limits of the development and not encroach adjacent properties. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 10:29 AM Top of curb elevation still appears to be below ponding elevation. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM The grading has been updated so that the ponding areas remain within the limits of the development, and flow east towards the existing dry detention facility. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 86 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:39 PM Changemark 305.05 Please provide spread calcs. The allowable spread of water on Local and Collector Streets is limited to maintaining a 10-foot moving lane of traffic for the design storm. An overflow channel/swale between sag inlets and overflow paths or basin shall be provided at sag inlets so that the maximum depth of water that might be ponded in the street sag shall not exceed the top of the curb. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM Gutter spread calculations have been provided for all sag inlets. The inlet capacity calculations show that the ponding at each inlet does not exceed the top of the curb (6 inches). Please refer to Appendix G of the drainage report. Resolved 87 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:42 PM Changemark 305.05 ponding limits shall not come into contact with the building C1.5 Emergency Flood Route Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM We have revised the grading to ensure that the ponding limits do not come into contact with the building. Resolved 88 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:43 PM Changemark 306.02.D a minimum 20-foot width easement shall be required as access easement from a public right-of-way to the facility, unless the pond is immediately next to a public right-of-way. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM A 20' access easement has been added from the R/W to the underground detention facility. Resolved 89 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:45 PM Changemark 401.01 subsurface drain shall be Double Wall Hancor Hi-Q or equivalent. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:50 PM This note has been added to the Site Utility Plan (Sheet C1.4). Resolved 90 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:48 PM Changemark 501.01 A minimum of 2.0 feet of vertical separation between storm sewers and sanitary sewers shall be required. When this is not possible, the sanitary sewer must be encased in concrete or ductile steel within 5 feet, each side, of the crossing centerline. There should be no less than 2.5 feet of cover along any part of the pipe from final pavement elevation or final ground surface elevation to the top of the pipe. C6.2 Storm Plan and Profile.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM We have added callouts to the sanitary plan and profiles to have the sanitary sewer encased in concrete within 5' of each side where 2' of vertical separation cannot be achieved. We have revised the plans to provide at least 2.5 feet of cover. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 91 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:49 PM Changemark 501.03 manhole/inlet inside sizing shall be according to the Hamilton County Standard Detail Drawings. C8.3 Construction Details.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM We have provided the standard manhole details from Hamilton County Standard Details Drawings on Sheet C8.3. However, HCSO does not have any inlet details. In order to keep everything consistent, we would like keep the INDOT nomenclature with the understanding that HCSO specifications will need to be met with each structure. Resolved 92 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:51 PM Changemark 501.03 2 foot sumps are required in the last structure before the detention facility or wet pond, with the structure placed within 15 feet of the back of curb of a roadway, and if this structure is a curb inlet and the structure sizing chart would allow this to be a 2â?? x 2â?? box, it must be upsized to a 48â? manhole because of the 2â?? sump. C6.2 Storm Plan and Profile.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM Two (2) foot sumps were added to the storm structures upstream of the water quality units. Because the structures are located in a parking garage, they are accessible and do not need to be within 15 feet of the back of curb of a roadway. Resolved 93 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:56 PM Changemark Details Please include critical elevations on detention cross section. Please include Carmel standard road section that indicates use of underdrain. Please indicate how detention will incorporate WQ feature and provide calculations. C8.6 Construction Details.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM Critical elevations have been labeled on the detention cross section on Sheet C8.6. The most up to date Carmel standard road section that indicates use of underdrain has been provided on Sheet C8.2. We have included the stormtrap site saver calculations to the drainage report in the water quality section. Resolved 94 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:57 PM Changemark 501.06.5 Swimming Pool drains shall not be connected to the storm sewers unless the water is dechlorinated prior to being connected to the storm sewer. However, water generated from filter backwash shall be directed to the sanitary sewer system. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM We have confirmed with the pool designer that the pool drains will be connected to sanitary. We have shown a sanitary pressure pipe lateral from the pool to the sanitary main on the Site Utility Plan. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 95 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:58 PM Changemark 701.01 WQ structures should be placed ahead of detention. Please provide detail and calculations for diversion structure. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 4/18/23 11:06 AM We have updated the drainage report to include the NJDEP/NJCAT certification/sizing chart ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 4:06 PM Please provide additional information confirming that the Site Savers are sized per NJDEP/NJCAT. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM We have provided a stormtrap site savers upstream of the underground detention facility. Diversion calculations were provided for the diversion structure for the aqua-swirl. The site saver - 4 has capacity for 32 cfs (which is more than what the pipe can convey) a diversion structure is not needed for these. Resolved 96 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 5:59 PM Changemark 701.07 20-foot wide access easement from a public right-of-way to each BMP shall be provided. C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 8:45 AM We have revised the BMP and Access Easement to encompass all BMPs with at least 10' in each direction. Please note that there is only 6' from structure 204 to the proposed column. We have shifted the easement as far west as we can to center the easement on the BMP as much as possible. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 11:19 AM Please adjust easement so that each BMP is fully encompassed by a 20' easement, that the easement extends at least 10' in each direction. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:51 PM A 20-foot access easement from the right-of-way to each BMP has been provided. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 97 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 6:00 PM Changemark Detention WQ Please provide calculations for WQ treatment provided by UG detention. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM There is no water quality being provided in the underground detention facility. The water quality treatment train consists of site savers upstream of the detention facility and an aqua-swirl downstream of the underground detention facility. Resolved 98 1 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 10/3/22 6:02 PM Changemark Â§ 6-198 of Carmel City Code of Ordinances Filling of the land in the floodplain of a regulated drain or any natural stream or watercourse, that has a contributing drainage area of 25 acres or more, located within the City of Carmel is prohibited. The use of the floodplain area for detention/retention ponds or lakes is also prohibited. Floodplain boundaries are to be determined by using the 100-year base flood elevation (BFE) as shown on the flood insurance rate maps (FIRM) of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Hamilton County one-foot topographic data available on the Hamilton County GIS webpage. (b) If a FIRM does not establish a 100-year BFE for a regulated drain, natural stream, or natural watercourse, the 100-year BFE shall be established through a site specific floodplain study performed by a professional engineer registered in the State of Indiana in accordance with the IDNR Hydraulic Modeling Guidelines. (2) If the drainage area for the floodplain study is less then one square mile at the farthest downstream point of the study, then the floodplain study must be submitted to the City of Carmel for review and approval. The City of Carmel will have the option to send the floodplain study to a consulting engineering firm for review and comment, should the accuracy of the floodplain study be in question. The cost of the consulting engineering firm's time will be the responsibility of the owner of the project and will need to be consented to in a written agreement prior to any review of the floodplain study by the consulting engineer. C1.0 Existing Conditions.pdf Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 3/6/23 5:04 PM Comment is resolved but the emphasis is that the proposed bypass pipe has sufficient capacity. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:52 PM No floodplain limits are shown on the FIRM Map. Resolved 99 1 Carmel Utilities Lisa Kempa 10/4/22 8:49 AM Comment Please send a set of paper plans to Carmel Utilities at 30 W. Main St., Carmel, IN 46032. Please include water and sewer utility information. Thank you. Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:47 PM a full size paper set of plans were sent to Carmel Utilities on 12/20/2022 Resolved 100 1 Carmel Water Operations Steve Cook 10/10/22 8:27 AM Changemark Changemark note #01 contact to discuss design Steve Cook Carmel Water 317-716-3913 thanks, Steve C1.4 Site Utility Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 12/20/22 3:45 PM We have coordinated with Carmel Utilities on design. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 101 2 Carmel Water Operations Steve Cook 2/8/23 11:22 AM Comment we will need to have discussion on water design for the water main located on main street prior to approval for plans pre-con/construction Info Only 102 2 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/9/23 9:50 AM Changemark lot cover % Please label the lot cover percentage to the site plan. And, please make sure that it is less than 80%. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:20 AM We have added a lot cover table in the top right corner of the site improvement plan. The table reflects 85.8% impervious cover. It is our understanding that we received a variance to allow for 86% impervious cover. Resolved 103 2 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/9/23 10:18 AM Changemark Transportation Plan compliance As discussed with Brad Schrage, a BZA variance will be filed from UDO section 1.07 - Compliance with the Transportation Plan. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 10:05 AM Variance was approved during 3/27/2023 BZA hearing. Resolved 104 2 Carmel Utilities Lisa Kempa 2/9/23 10:30 AM Comment Fees will need to be paid Info Only 105 2 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/13/23 11:42 AM Comment Please upload a Landscape Plan for the Urban Forestry Dept. to review. Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:18 PM We have submitted a planting plan showing the proposed street trees. The file is located in Files/Architectural Drawings. This PDF has been reviewed and approved by the City of Carmel. Resolved 106 2 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 2/13/23 11:43 AM Changemark sidewalk Please continue this sidewalk south and stub it to the south property line. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:17 AM We have extended the sidewalk to the south and provided a stubout at the south property line. for future connection.- Resolved 107 2 Urban Forestry Daren Mindham 2/24/23 1:56 PM Changemark landscape plan Please submit a landscape plan for review. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:18 PM We have submitted a planting plan showing the proposed street trees. The file is located in Files/Architectural Drawings. This PDF has been reviewed and approved by the City of Carmel. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 108 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:27 PM Changemark Changemark note #01, CRC - Loss of brick on elevation Why is there a loss of brick in this section compared to the elevations submitted for CRC Architectural Review Committee? The windows in this section are unaligned - is this intentional? ERS - Elevations 1.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:59 AM The most current elevations have been submitted to ProjectDox. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:50 AM Per the last meeting with the CRC, brick has been added back at intermediate spaces. Metal panel has been limited to areas corresponding to internal floors or stair landings. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Larysa Glaspie - 6/5/23 9:42 AM Thank you. Please add the brick back in this location. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:44 PM This was intentional. The building had an egress issue. Due to stairs being required in this location, windows had to be unaligned. Resolved 109 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:35 PM Changemark Changemark note #02, CRC - Street Trees Where will the street trees be located? C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 2/5/25 11:25 AM I believe this comment has been resolved ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:52 AM Street trees have been provided in the planting plans (overall and enlarged for more detail). this PDF can be found in File/architectural drawings/Planting Plan. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 9:30 AM We have submitted a planting plan showing the proposed street trees. The file is located in Files/Architectural Drawings. This PDF has been reviewed and approved by the City of Carmel. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 110 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:35 PM Changemark Changemark note #03, CRC - Number of Parking Spaces Label the number of parking spaces and bike parking spaces in each area. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:07 AM We have labeled the number of parking spaces and bicycle parking spaces in each area. the number is located within a hexagon. Resolved 111 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:35 PM Changemark Changemark note #04, CRC - Confirm there is a door/access to/from the garage to the public plaza Confirm there is a door/access to/from the garage to the public plaza. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:22 PM In the northwest corner of the parking garage, there is a set of double doors that leads to the plaza area in the northwest corner of the development. There is also a 10' sidewalk (north of the vehicular entry in the southwest corner of the garage) that pedestrians can use to access the plaza. Resolved 112 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:35 PM Changemark Changemark note #05, CRC - Confirm there is pedestrian access in/out of the garage here Confirm there is pedestrian access in/out of the garage here C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:42 PM On the east side of the parking garage there is a 5' sidewalk that pedestrians can utilize for access in/out of the garage. Resolved 113 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:37 PM Comment Where will the public restrooms accessible from the plaza be located? Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 7:00 AM The most current elevations have been submitted to ProjectDox. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:53 AM Public restroom signage placement and additional information to be provided with future signage package. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Larysa Glaspie - 6/5/23 9:59 AM Thank you. Where will the public restroom directional signage be located? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:09 AM Public restrooms are located in the walk through between retail and cafe. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 114 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:37 PM Comment Please provide the solar plan for review Responded by: Chad James - 2/5/25 11:34 AM We have added the solar plan to ProjectDox. It is located within the architectural drawings folder. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:54 AM We have added a PDF labeled "Icon Solar Array Plans" These plans are located in Files/Architectural Plans. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:09 AM This is still being worked on. The solar plan will be provided for review upon completion. Resolved 115 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:38 PM Comment Please ensure youre working with Carmel IT on camera locations. Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:10 AM There was a meeting held with CRC and Carmel IT on March 21st to discuss camera location. We are continuing to work with Carmel IT to finalize a plan. Resolved 116 2 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/27/23 3:38 PM Comment CRC will review the plaza plan when submitted. Reviewer Response: Larysa Glaspie - 2/12/25 10:16 AM CRC and developer will continue to work through some plaza details. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 2/5/25 11:34 AM We have uploaded the Plaza plan to projectdox. It is located within the architectural folder. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 11:33 AM We have added the plaza plans to this submittal. please refer to the PDF labeled Enlarged Plaza Materials and Notes Plan-L401 located in the files/architectural plans. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:11 AM The plaza plan(s) will be submitted to CRC upon completion. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 117 2 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 2/28/23 10:04 AM Changemark Parking Sign Standards Please see Correspondence folder for Public Parking Sign Design & Criteria guide for required signage for City of Carmel Public Parking. ERS - Elevations 2.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 2/5/25 11:36 AM Sign Permits will be submitted separately from this permit. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:56 AM Parking signage has been revised on elevations and civil plans per discussions with the CRC. ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 6/5/23 11:35 AM Please include all the parking garage signage with this ADLS filing. See Public Parking Sign Design & Criteria in the correspondence folder. This item is required at this stage of planning. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:17 AM This submittal does not include signage approval. Proposed signs for this project will be submitted at a later date. All signs are shown for reference only on the elevations. Info Only Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 118 2 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 2/28/23 10:29 AM Changemark Blade Sign Per UDO Sign Standards Blade signs may only take up to 70% of the Tenant Sign Pandrel. Please adjust and include height of Spandrel as marked. (plus a maximum Sign area 75sf) ERS - Elevations 1.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:56 AM Blade sign has been resized to show compliance with UDO ---------------------------------------------------------- Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 6/5/23 12:00 PM Please depict blade sign to comply with the maximum blade sign per UDO Sign Standards for approval purposes. See email for a more detailed explanation. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:16 AM This submittal does not include signage approval. Proposed signs for this project will be submitted at a later date. All signs are shown for reference only on the elevations. Resolved 119 2 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 2/28/23 10:31 AM Comment All Signs require a Sign Permit Application & Review Process. Please apply using our online Permitting Sign at www.carmeldocs.com. Info Only 120 2 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 2/28/23 10:33 AM Comment A Sign Package will be required before Sign Permit Applications are approved. Please submit one during the DP ADLS Process if possible, otherwise an ADLS Amend will be required before permitting. Sign Package should include sign locations, sign types, lighting method, and Mounting requirements. Info Only 121 2 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 2/28/23 10:33 AM Comment Please include Addressing number location Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:16 AM The elevation plans have been updated to show the location(s) of the addressing number. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 122 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/2/23 11:11 AM Changemark How will this work be completed due to the structures being within the garage? Old Meridian and Main O&M Manual.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:24 AM When located in a parking garage, there are a couple of different options for maintenance: for the nets: 1. tripod and a winch. 2. small enough forklift or bobcat. For maintenance of the sediment: 1. cleaning companies have a trailer bed option just for situations like this. 2. hose extension for a normal vac truck. Resolved 123 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/2/23 11:24 AM Changemark Please revise this area to remove the callouts regarding the sanitary sewer Per the demolition review, this will not be removed and the callouts should be removed. C1.1 Demolition Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:49 PM Call outs have been removed. Resolved 124 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/2/23 11:30 AM Changemark Please revise this sheet per our comments on the demolition plan set C1.1 Demolition Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 12:49 PM The demolition plan uploaded to projectdox is the same demolition plan provided in the demolition plan set. Resolved 125 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.a The grading and drainage plan shall include existing drainage facilities, including size, material, invert elevations and top casting information. Existing structure and pipe information shall be as-built information and not design information. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 3/28/23 9:14 AM We have updated the grading and drainage plan to show all existing drainage facilities including size, material, invert elevations and top of casting information. Existing structure and pipe information was shot in the field and considered as-built information. Resolved 126 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.d The grading and drainage plan shall include the delineation of all proposed land disturbing activities, including off-site activities that will provide services to the project site. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:55 PM We have added a grey dashed line to delineate the proposed land disturbing activities. Resolved 127 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.g The grading and drainage plan shall include the details of all existing streams and watercourses, and new drainage systems such as culverts, bridges, storm sewers, sub-surface drains (for both swales and roadways), curbing, conveyance channels, C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:56 PM We have revised C1.3 to include details of all existing streams and water courses, new drainage systems such as culverts, bridges, storm sewers, sub-surface drains, curbing, and conveyance channels. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 128 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.h The grading and drainage plan shall indicate as to the system being public or private. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:57 PM We have revised the narrative in the bottom right hand corner of C1.3 to indicate what system is public vs private. Resolved 129 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.j The grading and drainage plan shall include the locations of any off-site drainage swales, ditches and any other facilities that discharge onto the site of the proposed project. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:58 PM We have updated C1.3 to show off-site drainage swales, ditches and any other facilities that discharge onto the site of the proposed project. Resolved 130 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.j Please include dimensions of detention facility. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:59 PM We have added dimensions of the detention facility on C1.3. Resolved 131 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/2/23 1:29 PM Changemark 102.02.xi.q The grading and drainage plan shall include drainage arrows indicating all surface drainage, swales and on each side of every break in swale slopes. C1.3 Grading and Drainage Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 3:59 PM We have added flow arrows to C1.3 to show general direction stormwater runoff will flow at each break. Resolved 132 2 Engineering Alex Jordan 3/2/23 3:17 PM Changemark Please list the site savers here as well as the water quality units size C8.0 Stormwater Pollution Prevention Notes.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 4:04 PM We have updated the SWPPP notes to list the site savers and aqua-swirl Resolved 134 2 Transportation Systems David Littlejohn 3/3/23 12:05 PM Changemark Straighten ADA ramp/crosswalk Relocated the ADA ramp to provide a direct and straight crosswalk to the receiving ramp on the opposite side of the drive. C1.2 Site Improvements Plan.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:15 AM We have adjusted the ADA ramp to provide a direct and straight crosswalk to the receiving ramp on the opposite side of the drive. Resolved 135 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 9:58 AM Changemark Existing Pipe Please include survey data from existing 48" pipe outletting into existing ditch. C1.0 Existing Conditions.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 4:00 PM We have added the upstream invert and pipe invert information for the existing 48-inch pipe discharging into the ditch. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 136 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 10:09 AM Changemark Details Please provide details for OCS and diversion structure. C6.4 Storm Structure Data Table.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:30 AM Details for the OCS and diversion structure are on Sheet C8.4. Resolved 137 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 10:09 AM Changemark Existing Upstream Pipe Please include existing pipe information that is being connected to Str 500. C6.4 Storm Structure Data Table.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:26 AM We have revised the structure data table to include the existing pipe information that is being connected to Str. 500. Resolved 138 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 10:26 AM Changemark Off-site Drainage Please provide breakdown of runoff upstream of Str 500. It is unclear from where the 9.4 cfs is derived since the upstream area is 69.12 acres. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 4:02 PM We have revised the calculations, narrative, and added additional comments to provide clarification on what we were trying to convey with the proposed calculations on this sheet. Please refer to Appendix G of the revised drainage report. Resolved 139 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 10:26 AM Changemark Signature outflow Please clarify how offsite runoff numbers are being calculated or reference where they can be found. Per the Signature drainage report, the 10-year release rate is 8.86 cfs. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 4:03 PM We have revised the calculations, narrative, and added additional comments to provide clarification on what we were trying to convey with the proposed calculations on this sheet. Please refer to Appendix G of the revised drainage report. Resolved 140 2 CrossRoad Engineers Willie Hall 3/6/23 4:15 PM Changemark Roof Runoff All roof drainage shall be directed to the storm collection facilities. Any interior drains shall be routed to the sanitary sewer. 2021-274.Drainage Report.pdf Reviewer Response: Willie Hall - 6/8/23 2:55 PM Per 6/8/23 email from Chad James, the garage drains shown on the utility Plan Sheet connects the top deck of the parking garage to the storm sewer. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 5/22/23 6:24 AM We have updated the inlet basins map to include the roof drainage from the parking garage. Storm sewer calcs have been updated accordingly. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 141 3 Carmel Information Systems Morgan Rinehart 5/23/23 9:14 AM Comment Please show the conduit path from City MDF room to handhole located in the plaza area. Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:58 AM I believe this comment has been resolved. Can we change this to resolved in projectdox? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:49 AM We have updated C1.4 Site Utility Plan to show the conduit path from City MDF room to handhole located in plaza area. Info Only 142 3 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 5/31/23 4:03 PM Comment Garage IT layout cannot be approved until plaza design is finalized. Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:58 AM I believe this comment has been resolved. Can we change this to resolved in projectdox? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 11:37 AM We have added the plaza plans to this submittal. please refer to the PDF labeled Enlarged Plaza Materials and Notes Plan-L401 located in the files/architectural plans. Resolved 143 3 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 6/5/23 10:08 AM Comment Submit architecture showing the MDF/IDF layout as discussed in previous meetings. Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:59 AM The current architectural floor plans have been submitted to ProjectDox. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 11:01 AM Electrical plans for the garage have been provided for reference. These are located in the files/architectural plans Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 144 3 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 6/5/23 11:38 AM Comment Work with CRC and Engineering Department to add bollards between the trees adjacent to the plaza, as noted on the Planting Plan. Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 6:58 AM I believe this comment has been resolved. Can we change this to resolved in projectdox? ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 12/13/23 10:49 AM We have coordinated with the engineering department on locations and spacing. Proposal bollard and type of bollard are specified on the Site Improvements Plan. Resolved 145 3 Engineering Alex Jordan 6/7/23 9:42 AM Comment We have no further comments on the plans. Before a stormwater management permit can be issued, the following items will need to be submitted: 1. All remaining Crossroad Engineers comments addressed 2. A signed and recorded O&M manual 3. A right-of-way improvement engineers estimate stamped by the project engineer 4. A right-of-way improvement non-expiring performance bond for 100% of the approved estimate 5. An erosion control engineers estimate stamped by the project engineer 6. An erosion control non-expiring performance bond for 100% of the approved estimate 7. A completed BMP easement agreement with legal description and exhibit (template uploaded to correspondence folder) 8. A right-of-way permit application and $5,000 license and permit bond Info Only 146 3 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 6/8/23 11:27 AM Comment Please upload the floor plans for the buildings and for the parking garage (for all levels). Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:57 AM All floor plans for the proposed development have been uploaded to to file/architectural plans folder. Resolved 147 3 Planning & Zoning Angie Conn 6/8/23 11:30 AM Comment Please upload the overall building square footages. Please also break out the square footages for retail use, residential use, parking use, etc. Responded by: Chad James - 7/19/23 10:57 AM "Gross Square Footage - 641,264 SF Residential (Apartments) - 372,573 SF Residential (Condos) - 67,685 SF Parking Garage - 199,854 SF Reference Cover Sheet for additional information" Resolved 148 4 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 12/20/23 11:18 AM Comment Please resubmit with the updated architecture as discussed on 12/20/2023. Responded by: Chad James - 2/5/25 11:35 AM We have updated the architectural plans as discussed. Resolved Plan Review - Review Comments Report Project Name: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use Workflow Started: 8/31/2022 11:00:44 AM Report Generated: 02/24/2025 02:25 PM REF #CYCLE REVIEWED BY TYPE FILENAME DISCUSSION STATUS 150 4 Sign Permits Aliza Shalit 12/28/23 10:04 AM Comment Sign locations have been provided, if lighting and mounting method are included at this stage, it will suffice as a sign package, otherwise an ADLS Amend-Sign will have to be filed for the Sign Package requirement. No sign permits will be issued until the sign package has been completed. Reviewer Response: Aliza Shalit - 2/6/25 11:04 AM Sign Package is still outstanding, An ADLS Amend-Sign will be required to enter a Sign Package in the record before any sign permit is issued. ---------------------------------------------------------- Responded by: Chad James - 1/2/24 7:00 AM This has been noted. Info Only 151 5 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/7/25 11:49 AM Comment Signage is not included in this approval. Please submit a sign package for review. Info Only 152 5 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/12/25 10:13 AM Comment CRC and developer will continue to work through some plaza details. Info Only 153 5 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/13/25 10:24 AM Comment Cornice will need to be approved by CRC in an onsite mock-up during construction. Please coordinate with CRC (lglaspie@carmel.in.gov). Info Only 154 5 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/13/25 10:27 AM Comment Main Street plaza sign is a placeholder - CRC and developer to work though plaza signage. Info Only 155 5 Carmel Redevelopment Commission Larysa Glaspie 2/13/25 10:30 AM Comment Approved with conditions – This project is approved pending final approval from the Carmel Redevelopment Commission. Please contact the CRC directly for final approval. Henry Mestetsky, Executive Director of the Carmel Redevelopment Commission, can be reached at hmestetsky@carmel.in.gov or (317) 443-4679. Signage and murals require a separate ADLS and CRC review/approval. Please see all Info Only comments. - Cornice will need to be approved by CRC in an onsite mock-up during construction. Please coordinate with CRC (lglaspie@carmel.in.gov). - Main Street plaza sign is a placeholder - CRC and developer to work though plaza signage. - CRC and developer will continue to work through some plaza details. Info Only Confidence in the built environment. 135 N. Pennsylvania Street, Suite 2800 Indianapolis, IN 46204 www.hwcengineering.com Indianapolis | Hammond | Lafayette | Muncie | New Albany | Terre Haute www.hwcengineering.com December 20, 2022 Jeremy Kashman City Engineer Department of Engineering One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 RE: Board of Public Works Request Letter Old Meridian & Main Dear Mr. Kashman, The Old Meridian and Main Development requires approval from the City of Carmel Board of Public Works for construction and installation for the following items: public storm sewer infrastructure, public roadway improvements, and public sidewalk improvements. Public Roadway Improvements The proposed development will remove the existing curb and gutter on the south side of Main Street, along the entire frontage for the proposed development and a portion within the existing round-a-bout. Along the south side of Main Street, ten (10), parallel street parking spaces are being proposed, new curb and gutter will be installed along the new edge of pavement, and existing pavement south of the centerline will be milled and overlaid. There will also be a patch of existing asphalt removed and replaced with flush colored concrete. This lines up with the future median planned for Main Street but allows fire truck access and WB-67 delivery trucks to enter the proposed eastern driveway into the development. Additional curb and gutter is being removed and replaced within the limits of the round-a-about. While working with the City of Carmel on the Right-of-way improvements, it was determined that Main Street would be narrowed to two (2) twelve (12) foot lanes east and west bound on Main Street at the round-a-bout. In order to ensure a smooth transition to the new curb line for Main street, a small adjustment was needed in the round-a-bout curb line. With these proposed improvements, we are proposing to close down east bound Main Street from the round-a-bout to the western property of the proposed development. A 10’ westbound lane would be maintained for the entirety of construction within the right-of-way. Please refer to Sheet C3.0 for additional information regarding the Maintenance of Traffic Plan. Public Sidewalk Improvements The proposed development will remove the existing concrete sidewalk and asphalt multi-use path along the entire frontage of the development (adjacent to Old Meridian, the round-a-bout, and Main Street. In the proposed conditions there will be a 10-foot concrete multi-use path along the entire frontage of the development. In addition, existing ADA ramps are being removed and replaced in the same location near the round-a-bout and proposed ADA ramps will be provided on each side of the proposed drives into the development. With the proposed improvements, we are proposing to close down the sidewalk along the east side of Meridian Street and the south side of Main Street for the entirety of construction within and near the right of way. Please refer to Sheet C3.1 for additional information regarding the Pedestrian Maintenance of Traffic Plan. Public Storm Sewer Infrastructure In the existing conditions, there is a roadside ditch (for lack of better words) on the south side of Main Street, along the entire frontage of the proposed development. This ditch collects and conveys stormwater runoff from the dry detention basin for the existing round-a-bout, a portion of Main Street inlets, the ultimate outfall point for the The Signature development (north side of Main Street), and majority of the proposed development’s stormwater. In order to provide pedestrian access from the proposed building to the on street parking spots, the roadside ditch is being filled in and a proposed 42-inch storm pipe is being utilized to convey all stormwater runoff to the ditch east of the proposed development. Due to all of the existing utility infrastructure located along the south side of Main Street, the constructability of the 42-inch storm line was going to be very difficult. We are proposing to install the 42-inch line within the edge of pavement along Main Street If you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Chad T. James, P.E. Senior Project Manager December 20, 2022 Alex Jordan Plan Review Coordinator City of Carmel Engineering Department Carmel City Hall One Civic Square, Carmel, IN 46032 RE: Variance Request Letter CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS ERS Old Meridian and Main – Mix Use Mr. Jordan, Per the recent drainage review by City of Carmel for ERS Old Meridian & Main as part of Carmel TAC Meeting, I am following up with a variance request to the City of Carmel, IN Stormwater Technical Standards Manual and City of Carmel Comprehensive Plan as listed below: 1. Reference #19 - The City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan indicates a proposed off street trail in this approximate location. Please revise the plans to include this trail to comply with the City's Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Response: We have revised the plans to provide an off-street path that runs from Old Meridian and Main, south, through the site. However, due to the site constraints, we are not able to meet the width of the off-site trail shown in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 2. Reference #22 - The City's bicycle and pedestrian plan requires a 12 ft wide Urban Commercial sidewalk for new developments along Old Meridian. at this location. Revise the plans to include a 12 ft sidewalk along the project's entire Old Meridian frontage. Response: With this project being a coalition between the CRC, City of Carmel, and Edward Rose and Sons, we are not able to fit a 12’ wide urban commercial sidewalk along Old Meridian while also meeting the CRC’s requirements of having a plaza area on the corner of Old Meridian and Main. We were able to provide a 10’ wide concrete multi-use path along the entire frontage of the property. We would like to request a variance to reduce the width from 12’ to 10’ for the path along Old Meridian Street. 3. Reference #30 - Please verify that there are no direct discharge areas Response: There is a small portion of the site (0.06 acres of grass area only) on the southeast corner of the development that directly discharges into the existing detention basin on Rose Walk. We have reviewed the Rose Walk drainage report and they are providing detention for 0.17 acres of the existing site, consisting mostly of existing paved parking lot). We are reducing the CN value, acreage, and ultimately the number of cfs directly discharging off-site. Calculations and exhibits can be found in the revised drainage report. We would like to request a variance to allow for the 0.06 acres of grass area to continue to discharge to the existing detention basin off-site. 4. Reference #41 - Per the Transportation Plan, this section of Main Street is classified as a parkway arterial street and requires a full right-of-way width of 120'. A 60' half will need to be dedicated with this project. Please show this on the next submittal. Response: With this project being a coalition between the CRC, City of Carmel and Edward Rose and Sons, we are not able to fit the proposed condos, a 502 public parking garage, apartment building, and an emergency access for the fire department on the south side of the development while providing 60’ half ROW. We would like to request a variance to allow for a 40’ half ROW along the Main Street frontage of our property. 5. Reference #42 - Per the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Map in the Transportation Plan, the proposed concrete sidewalk will need to be revised. A 10' asphalt multi-use path will be required along the Main Street frontage and an urban commercial sidewalk is required along the Old Meridian frontage. Please revise. Response: We are currently providing a 10’ concrete multi-use path along Main Street. With the propose plaza area located on the northwest corner of the development, the developer believes the area will look more congruent with concrete instead of asphalt and concrete. We would like to request a variance to provide a 10’ concrete multi-use path instead of asphalt. Please refer to Reference #22 for the variance request regarding the urban commercial sidewalk. 6. Reference #43 - A proposed off-street trail is shown in this location on the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan Map. This will need to be provided per the Transportation Plan. Please revise the plans to show this. Response: We have revised the plans to provide an off-street path that runs from Old Meridian and Main, south, through the site. However, due to the site constraints, we are not able to meet the width of the off-site trail shown in the City’s Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. 7. Reference #45 - The building elevations on these buildings need to be revised The finished floors and flood protection grades for these buildings are only 0.1' to 0.2' above the local flooding source. We require these elevations for to 1' above the ponding. Please revise. Response: Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the ponding elevations 1’ below the finished floor elevations. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 8. Reference #46 - These elevations will need to be raised above the proposed ponding in the courtyards. These elevations will need to be 1' above the ponding in the courtyards. Response: Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the ponding elevations 1’ below the finished floor elevations. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 9. Reference #75 - The building’s lowest entry elevation that is adjacent to and facing a road shall be a minimum of 12 inches above the road elevation. Response: Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the building’s FFE 12 inches above the road elevation at certain locations (mainly the northeast corner of the building). We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 10. Reference #77 - The 100-year elevation of stormwater detention facilities shall be separated by not less than 25 feet from any building or structure to be occupied. Response: With the proposed development utilizing an underground detention facility located underneath the parking garage, we are not able to provide the 25 foot separation from the proposed building to the 100-year water surface elevation. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 11. Reference #78 - Detention basins, assumed full to the 100-year water surface elevation or the emergency overflow weir elevation, whichever is higher, shall be placed within a common area either platted or legally described and recorded as a perpetual stormwater easement. A minimum of fifteen (15) feet horizontally from the top of bank of the facility, or the 100-year pool if no defined top of bank is present, shall be dedicated as permanent stormwater easement if the above-noted boundary of the common area does not extend that far. Response: With the proposed development utilizing an underground detention facility under the proposed parking garage, we are not able to meet this requirement. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 12. Reference #84 - MFPG and FFE shall be minimum of 1' above the local ponding elevation. Response: Due to the site being so tight and having a lot of plaza/courtyard area where ADA slopes are required in all directions, we are not able to get the ponding elevations 1’ below the finished floor elevations. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. 13. 501.03 – A minimum drop of 0.1 foot through manholes and inlet structures should be provided. We have provided a 0.1’ drop in all structures that would still provide the minimum 2.5’ of cover over the pipe. Some runs of pipe do not have the 0.1’ drop in order to meet the minimum cover requirement, ensure that connections to existing pipes provide positive drainage, or keep the underground detention facility as low as possible. We would like to request a variance for this requirement. In the interim, if you should have any questions, or are in need of additional information, please feel free to contact me at your convenience. Sincerely, Chad T. James, P.E. Senior Project Manager 1 Chad James From:McCoy, David W <DMcCoy@carmel.in.gov> Sent:Thursday, December 1, 2022 12:43 PM To:Chad James Cc:Bradley Schrage Subject:RE: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main Mix Use Hi Chad, I was just discussing this with Fire Marshall Lucas Ray and I didn’t realize that this was one large building. So this project just needs one address, correct? I would say 1025 W Main St for the address. If you wanted to choose a number it could be any odd number between 1009 and 1041. What do you think? David McCoy GIS Analyst/Addressing Coordinator, City Of Carmel, IN 317-571-2566 From: Chad James <cjames@hwcengineering.com> Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 9:27 AM To: McCoy, David W <DMcCoy@carmel.in.gov> Cc: Bradley Schrage <Bradley_Schrage@edwardrose.com> Subject: CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main Mix Use Good Morning Dave, We received your comment regarding the address of the building. The developer would like the entire development to be addressed off Main Street. Is that a possibility with the way the site is laid out? Thanks, Chad Chad James, PE Senior Project Manager M: 317-767-1547 | D: 317-419-6767 135 N. Pennsylvania Street, Suite 2800, Indianapolis, IN 46204 HWC Engineering www.hwcengineering.com Owner Acknowledgement Agreement (“Agreement”) For good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the undersigned owner (“Owner”) hereby submits this Operation and Maintenance Manual (“Manual”) to the City of Carmel, Indiana (“City”) as a written acknowledgement of Owner’s warranty and agreement to institute, maintain, and follow the water quality Best Management Practices (“BMPs”) listed below, and to follow and abide by the inspection schedule and maintenance activities listed in this Manual. The Owner also hereby agrees to provide, at Owner’s cost, all additional maintenance, repair, and/or replacement services reasonably necessary to maintain the function and longevity of the BMPs from and including the date this Agreement is executed by Owner to and including the date on which a new Agreement is filed with the City by another party who assumes all of the obligations and responsibilities of Owner as set forth herein. BMPs: ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________ _______________________________ ________________________ Owner Signature Date _______________________________ ______________________________ Printed Name Company STATE OF INDIANA ) ) SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared _________________________________ Owner subscribed and sworn before this ____ day of __________________, ________. ______________________________ ______________________________ County of Residence Signature ______________________________ Commission Expiration Date ______________________________ Printed Name 1 Chad James From:Chad James Sent:Tuesday, December 20, 2022 11:55 AM To:Miller, Chad Subject:CRC PZ-2022-00181 DP ADLS - ERS Old Meridian and Main - Mix Use CAD File Attachments:ACAD-21274S.zBase.dwg Good Afternoon Chad, Attached to this email is the latest CAD file for your use. Please let me know if there are any questions or if any additional information is needed. Thanks, Chad 1 Carmel Public Parking Sign Design & Criteria Department of Community Services CarmelCITYOF 2 Blade Signs A Blade Sign is the primary sign type used for public parking identification. It is to be located above or near all garage entrances and must be visible from each approach to the garage. If the entrance to the garage is not visible from the roadway, additional wayfinding signage is required to direct patrons from the road to the garage. The exact measurements and color specifications can be found below and must be adhered to. APPROVED BY DATE PAGE 3 Field survey required prior to fabricaon. All electrical is configured to 120V unless otherwise specified. The concepts herein are the property of ISF INC. Permission to reproduce, copy or use the design or proposal can only be obtained through written agreement with ISF INC. Due to screen calibration and printing capabilities, the colors shown are only to be used as a close representation or final product. •DESIGN FABRICATION isfsigns.com317.251.1219 6468 Rucker Road •INSTALLATION SERVICE Indianapolis, IN 46220 DESIGNED BY: CA REVISED LAST BY: CA LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ STREET FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ WALL FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ Style and construction to match existing sign 24” S4 Fabricate and install (1) 2 sided face lit blade sign Main Cabinet - .080” aluminum cladding, .040” returns, & 2” retainer painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum Boarder: 1/2” Clear Acrylic Push-thrus w/ second surface diffuser vinylFace: .090” Aluminum Painted PMS 072C Blue match w/ routed text and boarder “P”: 1/2” push through clear acrylic “P” with second surface diffuser vinyl Bottom Arm - .080” aluminum cladding, routed for 1/2” arrow clear acrylic push-thru w/ second surface diffuser, Front elevation painted PMS 1245C Yellow, side and back elevations painted PMS 1245C Yellow, PMS 491C Red Mounting: Thru-bolt mounted flush via aluminum spacers painted MP 413420 brushed aluminumIllumination: AVL 6500 white LEDs SCALE: 1/16”=1’ 72 1 / 2 " 56 " 60" 10 3 / 4 " 3 3/4" 9 1 / 4 ” 28 1 / 2 ” 9 1/4” 2" 31 5 / 8 ” S4 Railyard Chris Young Carmel, IN 7-12-2021 rail_5-3119-A_v2 PUBLICPARKING PUBLICPARKING APPROVED BY DATE PAGE 3 Field survey required prior to fabricaon. All electrical is configured to 120V unless otherwise specified. The concepts herein are the property of ISF INC. Permission to reproduce, copy or use the design or proposal can only be obtained through written agreement with ISF INC. Due to screen calibration and printing capabilities, the colors shown are only to be used as a close representation or final product. •DESIGN FABRICATION isfsigns.com317.251.1219 6468 Rucker Road •INSTALLATION SERVICE Indianapolis, IN 46220 DESIGNED BY: CA REVISED LAST BY: CA LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ STREET FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ WALL FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ Style and construction to match existing sign 24” S4 Fabricate and install (1) 2 sided face lit blade sign Main Cabinet - .080” aluminum cladding, .040” returns, & 2” retainer painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum Boarder: 1/2” Clear Acrylic Push-thrus w/ second surface diffuser vinylFace: .090” Aluminum Painted PMS 072C Blue match w/ routed text and boarder “P”: 1/2” push through clear acrylic “P” with second surface diffuser vinyl Bottom Arm - .080” aluminum cladding, routed for 1/2” arrow clear acrylic push-thru w/ second surface diffuser, Front elevation painted PMS 1245C Yellow, side and back elevations painted PMS 1245C Yellow, PMS 491C Red Mounting: Thru-bolt mounted flush via aluminum spacers painted MP 413420 brushed aluminumIllumination: AVL 6500 white LEDs SCALE: 1/16”=1’ 72 1 / 2 " 56 " 60" 10 3 / 4 " 3 3/4" 9 1 / 4 ” 28 1 / 2 ” 9 1/4” 2" 31 5 / 8 ” S4 Railyard Chris Young Carmel, IN 7-12-2021 rail_5-3119-A_v2 PUBLICPARKING PUBLICPARKING APPROVED BY DATE PAGE 3 Field survey required prior to fabricaon. All electrical is configured to 120V unless otherwise specified. The concepts herein are the property of ISF INC. Permission to reproduce, copy or use the design or proposal can only be obtained through written agreement with ISF INC. Due to screen calibration and printing capabilities, the colors shown are only to be used as a close representation or final product. •DESIGN FABRICATION isfsigns.com317.251.1219 6468 Rucker Road •INSTALLATION SERVICE Indianapolis, IN 46220 DESIGNED BY: CA REVISED LAST BY: CA LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ STREET FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ WALL FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ Style and construction to match existing sign 24” S4 Fabricate and install (1) 2 sided face lit blade sign Main Cabinet - .080” aluminum cladding, .040” returns, & 2” retainer painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum Boarder: 1/2” Clear Acrylic Push-thrus w/ second surface diffuser vinylFace: .090” Aluminum Painted PMS 072C Blue match w/ routed text and boarder “P”: 1/2” push through clear acrylic “P” with second surface diffuser vinyl Bottom Arm - .080” aluminum cladding, routed for 1/2” arrow clear acrylic push-thru w/ second surface diffuser, Front elevation painted PMS 1245C Yellow, side and back elevations painted PMS 1245C Yellow, PMS 491C Red Mounting: Thru-bolt mounted flush via aluminum spacers painted MP 413420 brushed aluminumIllumination: AVL 6500 white LEDs SCALE: 1/16”=1’ 72 1 / 2 " 56 " 60" 10 3 / 4 " 3 3/4" 9 1 / 4 ” 28 1 / 2 ” 9 1/4” 2" 31 5 / 8 ” S4 Railyard Chris Young Carmel, IN 7-12-2021 rail_5-3119-A_v2 PUBLICPARKING PUBLICPARKING Created by "ISF Signs PMS 1245 (Mustard Yellow) PMS 431C (Brick Red) PMS 072C (Blue) 2 sided face-lit Blade Sign specs: Main Cabinet - .080" aluminum cladding, .040" returns, 2" retainer painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum. Boarder - ½" Clear Acrylic Push-thrus with second surface diffuser vinyl Face - .090" Aluminum Painted PMS 072C Blue match with routed text and boarder. "P" - ½" push-thru clear acrylic "P" with second surface diffuser vinyl. Bottom Arm - .080" aluminum cladding, routed for ½" arrow clear acrylic push-thru with second surface diffuser. Front elevation painted PMS 1245C Yellow, side and back elevations painted PMS 1245C Yellow, PMS 491C Red. Mounting - Thru-bold mounted flush via aluminum spacers painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum. Illumination - AVL 6500 white LEDs. Left Elevation Scale: ¾"=1' Right Elevation Scale: ¾"=1' APPROVED BY DATE PAGE 3 Field survey required prior to fabricaon. All electrical is configured to 120V unless otherwise specified. The concepts herein are the property of ISF INC. Permission to reproduce, copy or use the design or proposal can only be obtained through written agreement with ISF INC. Due to screen calibration and printing capabilities, the colors shown are only to be used as a close representation or final product. •DESIGN FABRICATION isfsigns.com317.251.1219 6468 Rucker Road •INSTALLATION SERVICE Indianapolis, IN 46220 DESIGNED BY: CA REVISED LAST BY: CA LEFT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ RIGHT ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ STREET FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ WALL FACING ELEVATION SCALE: 3/4”=1’ Style and construction to match existing sign 24” S4 Fabricate and install (1) 2 sided face lit blade sign Main Cabinet - .080” aluminum cladding, .040” returns, & 2” retainer painted MP 413420 brushed aluminum Boarder: 1/2” Clear Acrylic Push-thrus w/ second surface diffuser vinylFace: .090” Aluminum Painted PMS 072C Blue match w/ routed text and boarder “P”: 1/2” push through clear acrylic “P” with second surface diffuser vinyl Bottom Arm - .080” aluminum cladding, routed for 1/2” arrow clear acrylic push-thru w/ second surface diffuser, Front elevation painted PMS 1245C Yellow, side and back elevations painted PMS 1245C Yellow, PMS 491C Red Mounting: Thru-bolt mounted flush via aluminum spacers painted MP 413420 brushed aluminumIllumination: AVL 6500 white LEDs SCALE: 1/16”=1’ 72 1 / 2 " 56 " 60" 10 3 / 4 " 3 3/4" 9 1 / 4 ” 28 1 / 2 ” 9 1/4” 2" 31 5 / 8 ” S4 Railyard Chris Young Carmel, IN 7-12-2021 rail_5-3119-A_v2 PUBLICPARKING PUBLICPARKING Wall Facing Elevation Scale: ¾"=1' Street Facing Elevation Scale: ¾"=1' 3 Wall Signs When room is available, a wall sign may be used in conjunction with a blade sign. Wall signs must include the development’s name, “Parking Garage,” and the standard public parking P, as defined on page 7, on both sides of the name. Doing so communicates to drivers that the garage is public and identifies the development they will be parking at. Wall signs are to be flush or pin mounted and the colors and illumination must fit within the context of the development and surrounding uses. Example: 4 Suspended & Vinyl Signs A suspended sign is meant for pedestrians and vehicular drivers as they approach a garage opening. Hanging from a canopy, it signals vehicles to slow down, as well as for pedestrians to watch for oncoming traffic. This sign type must include the garage name, the standard public parking P, and a directional arrow. A red stripe is present at the top of the sign. Vinyl signage may also be used on canopy faces or garage doors. This sign type is meant as a secondary sign when a Suspended Sign is unfeasible. This sign type must include the garage name, the standard public parking P, and any other instructional or wayfinding text. Carmel P (See specifications page)Background color to match canopyCopy is Arial Bold 65" 8 5" PMS 491C (Brick Red) PARKING GARAGE Canopy Face PARKING GARAGE Carmel P (See specifications page)Copy is Arial Bold 8" 5 Digital Signs Digital signs alert drivers as to exactly how many empty spaces are currently available. The City of Carmel has two different units currently in use. One shows how many total parking spaces are free, the other one shows spaces available per category: regular spaces, EV charging spaces, handicap, and in some cases dedicated spaces. For questions and coordination of digital signage, please contact the Carmel Redevelopment Commission (CRC) at (317) 819-7207. 6 Entrance & Directional Signs Standard Public Parking and Resident Parking Signs A “Public Parking” header is required above all public vehicle entrances of the parking garage. This header must be mounted on black metal backing to increase visibility and include “Public Parking” text, two standard public parking P’s, and the standard lane indicator symbols. A “Resident Parking Only” header may be used above private vehicle entrances of the parking garage. This header must be mounted on black metal backing to increase visibility and include “Resident Parking Only” text and the standard lane indicator symbols. 7 Specs Public Parking/Resident Parking Only Specifications: 3D Metal Text Font: Arial Bold White Type on Black Metal Backing 8"13" 13"8" 8½" 1¾" thick 9" 1¾" thick 8"6½" ¼" white border PMS 186C (Red) PMS 368C (Green) PMS 072C (Blue) "P" Font: Franklin Gothic Heavy White Type on Blue Background Red "X": 3D Metal Green Arrow: 3D Metal Note: The X is recommended to be .5" shorter than the arrow to match the illusion of size. Note: Entrance Arrow is purposely shorter arrow. PMS 13-0630TN (Yellow) Note: Pay attention to word tracking and spread layout for visual balance. Clearance Bar Font: Franklin Gothic Demi Black Type on Safety Yellow Plastic Hanging Bar 5"3" Lettering Main Cabinet Specs: .080” aluminum cladding, .040” 3” deep returns painted Black -“P” circles: NON-LIT 1/2” flat cut acrylic digitally printed / UV treated White / (PMS 072C) Oracal 651 printable vinyl on face only mounted flush to cabinet (non-lit P’s and the circles are not routed copy and are just printed/laminated vinyl on the routed flat circle face) - Faces routed for 1/2” clear acrylic push-thrus with 2nd surface diffuser vinyl - “X” has digitally printed / UV treated (PMS 186C) Oracal 651 printable vinyl on face only - Arrow has digitally printed / UV treated (PMS 368C) Oracal 651 printable vinyl on face only Backs: .063” aluminum Illumination: Sloan Prisms White LEDs Mounting: Thru-bolt mounted flush to brick fascia - depending on thickness of facade stud mounting may be required Small Public Parking P and Directional Symbol Specifications: Clearance Bar Specification: 8 Other Exterior Signs The City will allow signage for public parking to be installed on light poles or as stand alone off-premise signs. These options are available when locating a particular parking garage has proven difficult for drivers and additional direction is required. Under special circumstances the City will allow uniquely designed public parking signs. These sign types should blend with a building’s architecture or contain designs and images unique to the district or surrounding uses. Pedestrian-scale exterior signage is required on all exterior doors to the garage. This signage shall include the name and address of the parking garage as well as “Parking Garage” text. 9 Sign Specs White and black borders are both 1/2” 3' 1' - 5 " 7¼ " 7¼ " 2' Reflective White Paint Text, Arrow & Borders on dibond sign face. Sign face color should emulate the structure color it is installed on. PMS 072C (Blue) The City of Carmel public parking symbol is a PMS 072 C (Blue) circle with a Franklin Gothic Heavy P centered in the middle. A white ring is also included. If used for directing traffic a white arrow is included below. P is Franklin Gothic Heavy and centered on circle Sign panel color should emulate the structure color it is installed on PMS 072C (Blue) Smaller directional style signs require reflective white paint text, arrow, and borders. 10 Interior Signs In addition to exterior signs, the City requires interior signage. Specifically, bicycle parking, video surveillance, and “No loitering or skateboarding” signs are required. Additionally, interior wayfinding, directory, and reserved parking signs should be included. The City recommends a cohesive design throughout the garage. Final design is subject to approval by the Carmel Redevelopment Commission. Bike Parking Copy is Arial Bold PMS 072C (Blue) When bike parking is present, directional signage is required. The public bike parking sign is similar to the public parking signs, however, the copy Bike Parking and image of a bicycle is incorporated on the sign. Signs will be installed near entrances and any other locations to properly direct cyclists to the parking area. A vector image of the bicycle can be provided upon request. 24-Hour Video Surveillance signs are required when City cameras are installed in the garage. Signs are installed at the main entrances to the garage. Please direct questions to the Carmel Information and Communications Systems Department (317-571-2567). 11 Interior Signs 1.5" Radius 3/8" Holes NO LOITERING OR SKATEBOARDING PERMITTED Carmel City Code §§6-66; 6-73 18" 1.5" 1.5" Per Ordinances D-2534-20 and D-2484-19 , skateboarding and loitering are not permitted within public parking garages. Signage, matching the adjacent specifications, is required to be installed in all public parking garages. Privately owned public parking garages are not automatically covered by the no loitering and no skateboarding ordinances. All privately owned public parking garages will need to enter into an Agreement for Parking and Traffic Regulation on Private Business Property with the City of Carmel to be protected by Carmel City Code § §6-66; 6-73, allowing police enforcement in the garage. Please work with the Carmel Redevelopment Commission to execute this agreement. 12 Please direct any questions to the City of Carmel Department of Community Services (317-571-2417) or Carmel Redevelopment Commission (317-819-7207) All Exterior Signs require Sign Permits through the Department of Community Services. Cross Reference to Deed: xxxx-xxxxxx GRANT OF PERPETUAL STORM WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT EASEMENT This easement (the “Easement”) is by and between the , (the "Grantor") and the City of Carmel, Indiana (the “City”), by and through its Board of Public Works & Safety (the “Grantee”) and shall have as its effective date the later of the date on which Grantor executes this Easement or the date on which Grantee executes this easement; WITNESSETH THAT: WHEREAS, Grantor is the owner of the real estate conveyed by the deed identified in the cross reference above (the “Real Estate”); WHEREAS, Grantor intends to on the Real Estate and, in connection with the construction, development and operation of the private , the City has approved or will approve a Storm Water Management Permit (the “Permit”); and, WHEREAS, the City requires this Easement in order to verify and require compliance with the terms and conditions of the Permit and all ordinances of the City applicable to storm water drainage and storm water quality management (collectively the “Ordinances”). NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants herein set forth and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantor hereby grants to the Grantee a non-exclusive, perpetual easement on the terms and conditions that follow: Section 1. Easement Area. The portion of Real Estate on, under and through which this Easement exists is legally described and graphically depicted in what is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as Exhibits “A” in two parts (the “Easement Area”). Section 2. Storm Water Quality System. Located or to be located within the Easement Area, in the manner and areas specified in the Permit, is certain drainage and storm water quality infrastructure, which may include, without limitation, pervious pavement, manholes, infiltration basins, pipes, and structural and non-structural best management practices (collectively the “Storm Water Quality System”) to be constructed, installed and maintained by Grantor, at Grantor’s expense, in accordance with the Permit and the Ordinances. Section 3. Purpose of Easement. Grantee shall be and hereby is permitted at all times to enter upon the Easement Area for purposes of (i) accessing, inspecting, examining, monitoring, testing and sampling the Storm Water Quality System, and (ii) identifying and verifying compliance with the requirements of the Permit and the Ordinances. Section 4. Maintenance and Repair. It shall be Grantor’s obligation to maintain in proper working order and to repair and/or replace the Storm Water Quality System, or parts thereof, such that (i) the effectiveness and performance of the Storm Water Quality System is not diminished from the capabilities set forth in the Permit and (ii) the Storm Water Quality System remains in compliance with the Permit and the Ordinances. Section 5. Failure of Storm Water Quality System. In the event that the condition of the Storm Water Quality System or the outflow therefrom violates or fails to comply with the requirements set forth in the Permit and/or any of the Ordinances, Grantee shall have the right, but not the obligation, after providing reasonable notice to Grantor, to perform, at Grantor’s expense, such maintenance, repair, modification and/or replacement of the Storm Water Quality System as is necessary to restore compliance with the requirements set forth in the Permit and/or the Ordinances; provided, however, that the performance by Grantee of any such maintenance, repair, modification and/or replacement of the Storm Water Quality System shall under no circumstances relieve Grantor of its responsibility to maintain and operate the Storm Water Quality System, which responsibility shall be continuous and ongoing. Section 6. Reimbursement of Expenses and Enforcement. Grantor shall reimburse Grantee for costs and expenses incurred by Grantee in the performance of the maintenance, repairs, modifications and/or replacements specified in Section 5 above and, in the event of litigation to recover such expenses, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees. Section 7. Character of Easement. This Easement shall be perpetual and, further, shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties’ respective successors and assigns. Section 8. Use by Grantor and Other Easements. Grantor shall be permitted to use the Easement Area and also to grant other easements within the Easement Area for any purposes which do not impair the Storm Water Quality System and which are not inconsistent or conflicting with this Easement and the Grantee’s rights under this Easement. Section 9. Amendment. This Easement may be amended only by a written instrument signed (i) by then owner of the Real Estate and Board of Public Works & Safety of Carmel, Indiana or its successor or (ii) by an order of a court of competent jurisdiction. In the event that the Real Estate is later redeveloped and, as such, the site plan made the subject of the Permit is revised, then the Grantee and then the owner of the Real Estate shall amend this Easement to reconfigure the Easement Area, accordingly, so that Easement Area is adjusted to and does not conflict with such revised site plan. Section 10. Authority. The undersigned person executing this Easement for and on behalf of Grantor represents and warrants that he or she has been duly authorized by Grantor to execute and deliver this Easement, and that all actions, votes, approvals and/or restrictions necessary to allow the execution and delivery of this Easement have been undertaken. _____________________________________________________________ By:_______________________________ _________________________________ Printed Name Date: ____________________________ STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared _______________________, who acknowledged execution of the foregoing Easement for and on behalf of _____________________________________. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _________ day of ___________________, 20__. My Commission Expires: ____________________________________ _____________________ Notary Public Residing in _______________County ____________________________________ Printed Name CITY OF CARMEL BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS & SAFETY ________________________________________ James Brainard, Mayor Date: __________ ________________________________________ Mary Ann Burke, Member Date: ____________ ________________________________________ Lori Watson, Member Date: ____________ ATTEST: ________________________________________ Sue Wolfgang, Clerk Date: ____________ STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared James Brainard, a member of the City of Carmel, Indiana Board of Public Works & Safety and acknowledged execution of the foregoing Easement for and on behalf of City of Carmel, Indiana Board of Public Works & Safety. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _________ day of ___________________, 20__. My Commission Expires: ____________________________________ _____________________ Notary Public Residing in _______________County ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Mary Ann Burke, a member of the City of Carmel, Board of Public Works & Safety and acknowledged execution of the foregoing Easement for and on behalf of Board of Public Works & Safety. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _________ day of ___________________, 20__. My Commission Expires: ____________________________________ _____________________ Notary Public Residing in _______________County ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Lori Watson, a member of the City of Carmel, Board of Public Works & Safety and acknowledged execution of the foregoing Easement for and on behalf of City of Carmel Board of Public Works & Safety. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _________ day of ___________________, 20__. My Commission Expires: ____________________________________ _____________________ Notary Public Residing in _______________County ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF INDIANA ) )SS: COUNTY OF HAMILTON ) Before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, personally appeared Sue Wolfgang, the Clerk of the City of Carmel, Indiana and acknowledged execution of the foregoing Easement as the Clerk of the City of Carmel, Indiana. Witness my hand and Notarial Seal this _________ day of ___________________, 20__. My Commission Expires: ____________________________________ _____________________ Notary Public Residing in _______________County ____________________________________ Printed Name Pursuant to IC 36-2-11-15(b)(2), I affirm, under the penalties for perjury, that I have taken reasonable care to redact each Social Security number in this document, unless required by law – Jon Oberlander, Esq. Prepared by: Jon Oberlander, Corporation Counsel, One Civic Square, Carmel, IN 46032 Return to: Jeremy Kashman, P.E., City Engineer, One Civic Square, Carmel, IN 46032