HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No.:
Petitioner:
Dl0C4>o~'Z.~ b-s..J
~S::N~A.Ml,J c::S/1>...tZiZ-€T'\
FINDINGS OF FACT. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE (Ballot Sheet)
1.
2.
"\.,
3.
DATED THIS
DAY OF
,20
Board Member
Page 7 of 8 - z:\sharedlfonns\BZA applications\ Development Standards Variance Application rev. 12/29/2006
. .ul
Docket No.:
CARMEL/CLAY ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL, INDIANA
O"o~on~5 'DS\J
~FE:...J\A..M.\,j G"q,~~
Petitioner:
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
~t:>..:~€-r'( \~ ~ ~, ~\o-e..\\V A.,ub
\ -r w \ L L -r;.,-;:
l';t.:'IL, ~ tt::.C:>~.
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
-r-".,,~ ,,",~\-L A't>'t> ~~~'"TA~\""L VI<.l..J,)(; -ro "..'1 ?e~vE\2'T" t ^~b
,",""\1$ ~A"j o~l..y iZ.A.\~E ~€\I"'w..>C O'F }t..~~Ia.L~~ \>eo?e\Z.T"
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
"t::lv€ -rn"\\o\C: O'b"b ~li!.~ ......~ ..;.4\A,Y-..!'" 6f".M. 'I ~tz.~\y t ,A. V ~~"l~~
~A~A.~Il..'-r,~-s. JA..lIb ~,..) FYlT'fZ..€M€LtI W,^,,-rE\) _ -0,.; vl4.fZ.'Iw~ \.Ill-&-
E"AfA'SLE N\.Er ~co ~'2o"'~^" """"'~ ~~O~ ~ "'l\.l~ 't:ot2.o~l!!ic. 'T".
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof.
Adopted this
day of
,20
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals
SECRETARY, CarmeVClay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
Page 8 of 8 - z:lsharedllorms\BZA applications\ Development Stendards Variance Application rev. 1212912006
__ ______ __ 1- __
STATEMENT OF VARIANCE
Docket No.: 07060025 DSV
Petitioner: Beniamin Garrett
It is my intention to build a deck, approximately 50' long, along the north side of
my house at 14582 Danbury Dr. My proposed design necessitates a variance of
development standards due to Carmel Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 10: 10.04.03
sub-section B.1., which states that the minimum side yard be maintained at ten
(10) feet from a single-family dwelling. My design would have the deck extending
beyond the side of my house out to the western edge of my property. The deck,
if approved, will be constructed within one foot of the property line in two (2)
places. The first being the corner of a partially octagonal step defining the
western boundary of the deck, and the second being the corner of a slightly
elevated octagon defining the northwestern boundary of the deck. However, a
majority of the desirable portion of this project will be extending into the ten (10)
foot barrier defined by the aforementioned zoning ordinance.
STATEMENT OF SUPPORT
Docket No.: 07060025 DSV
Petitioner: Beniamin Garrett
Due to the irregular size and shape of my lot, I have been left with a very small
back yard. With the neighborhood landscape easement being so close to my
house, my options have been extremely limited with respect to the usefulness
and enjoyment of my land. I also feel that in the future, the lack of back yard will
present problems when and if I decide to sell my house.
If this variance is approved, the most undesirable part of my house will become a
large selling point, and add a great deal of value to my house. More importantly,
I'll be able to enjoy my back yard, the way a homeowner should.
With the layout of my back yard, if I were to scale down my plans to not encroach
on my property line, the deck would not be large enough to comfortably
accommodate a normal sized patio set (table and chairs), and a grill.
Adjacent to the property line of interest, is a large field with a retention pond.
This area, as I understand, has the sole purpose of retaining run-off water from
the Lowes parking lot. Also, I do not have neighbors on either side of my
property. Therefore, I find it hard to believe that the encroachment of a deck on
my western property line will be a nuisance to anybody. However, it certainly
would allow me to make a much desired improvement to my home.
Roads
Interstate
US Highway
State Road
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Subdivision Roads
New Subdivision Roads
Private Road or Drive
~ Color Ortho Photo 2006
o Corporation Boundary
Map1
'"
,,6~" -
SCALE 1 : 402
~~.,...., I I
20 0 20 40
FEET
hHn../I"ieo ,......",..t'V\~1 in "',",\f/rY"l~_I"""'=I,.rnol .........urf
60
".( l
'Iii Ie
r;:;~'
..
~ Ill!
1
i1!J
m
)"
~
P.oi
(i;'j
11'0
\~
~7
, i
;,t,
r.:.;
N
A
TII<=>",rl!:l" _IIIn<=> 1? ?nn7 1'?R PI\
Roads
Interstate
US Highway
State Road
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Subdivision Roads
New Subdivision Roads
Private Road or Drive
Parcels: April 2006
~ Color Ortho Photo 2006
CJ Subdivisions
o Corporation Boundary
Map2
N
SCALE 1 : 1 ,338 A
~ ~ ""'""I ----1 I I
100 0 100 200 300
FEET
http://gis.carmel.in.gov/map/carmel.mwf
Wednesday, July 11, 200710:08 AM
JUN-13-2007 WED 10:36 AM
FAX NO.
P. 02
ft?'" Q:E[""" 'I...
"Holey Meley" soya.
"DON'T DIG SUI'
011 ....,..... """"7 All
t -800 t-i
_-8544 428-
.. ..... ....
~or '''dIOllO Stole Lav. 15-69-1
ogains! Ihe Lo., .11l.. e_covello lot
1I0lifyinq 'no un<l~r9round loCO!
two (2) workin9 Cloys before cc
work.
'if
59.44'
,
;:...
C\.j
C
.....
-
~
~
~
\
\~
~
,f1'
\
\
\1/1
. ~
\\
\~
\
\
\
LtGENPI
I!!Y!. e:xlttkle ElDvatloft
c::::J ~0Nd a.Jvltlon
... ~ P1aw
Plot
Plan
Lot #G7 In OANBU~"'" E5TATE5. &ection 1. lJ 'e.ubdivi&ion
W__;I~_", f"t_.._.... I_.J......
,~
,
3
1
11
I
' , 1
, .":
,,'J
i t
~
~
~
II
~
i!
'fI
I,
< ,
f ~
~z
"~,
"""'''-,,<
w
~
:>
o
:::c
"
'-<
<,
-
~'-~---"--"'~-'-'--~--"~'---,---'---'~""'~ .. ---_.._.-----_.-~
<< < << .3t-'" ~~~