Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponse to Spectra Comments (04-15-05) V" Martin Marietta Aggregates ~ Indiana District Office 1980 East 11 6th Street Suite 200 Carmel, IN 46032 Telephone (317) 573-4460 Fax (317) 573-5975 May 12, 2005 9 ~ ~tCSvr Al4r! 1...1) IJ J 2005 VCs Mr. Jon Dobosiewicz Planning Administrator, Department of Community Services City of Carmel, City Hall One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Re: Additional Information Response to April 15, 2005 Spectra Comments in Connection with the Application for Special Use Approval Mueller Property North Sand and Gravel Operation Dear Jon: Enclosed please find Martin Marietta's response to the Spectra Comments of April 15, 2005, as well as the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan and the Mueller Property North Sand and Gravel Operation Cross Sections. We hope this information is helpful to you. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely, ~ --y~' JorlA. Tiberi II Regional Vice President - General Manager MidAmerica Region JJT /pkc Enclosures MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. DOCS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSE TO APRIL 5, 2005 SPEC COMMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL APPROVAL MUELLER PROPERTY NORTH SAND AND GRAVEL OPERATIO ~ ,. ";. !i Ii Orhdnal Comment . The submitted documents are silent regarding the potential for the proposed action to influence the City of Carmel water supply wells in the Plant 4 Well field. For example, the proposed action will create a 30- foot deep lake within 350 feet ofthe property line of the Plant 4 Wellfield. Does the proposed lake fall within any portion of the capture area(s) of any wells in the Plant 4 Well field, and if so, what is the travel time of water from the lake to the wellfield? If the travel time is short, will development ofthe lake require the City of Carmel to change their treatment process for water from the Plant 4 Well field? This comment is directly related to the proposed mine plan and the proposed limits of extraction. The proximity of an open water body to the Plant 4 Wellfield during active mining and after reclamation is germane to the viability of the mining and reclamation plans. The proposed mining plan is being reviewed to ensure that there are no unmitigated impacts to the environment or community resulting from the proposed mine and subsequent reclamation. Where the Department of Community Services may have an interest in this topic as well, the question from a mining and reclamation perspective still stands and requires a response. Response Martin Marietta has retained a hydro-geologist to evaluate various hydrology issues raised by the City. Based on his recommendations, Martin Marietta has installed monitoring wells and continues to gather data to assist the City in modeling the impact of its proposed sand and gravel operation on the City's wells. Martin Marietta's consultant has since met with the Director of Carmel Utilities and the Utilities Department's consultants to exchange data and information. Additionally, the City was been given access to Martin Marietta's site to evaluate on site water handling. The City's Department of Utilities has indicated that it is satisfied that the Plant 4 Wellfield is adequately protected. Further, we understand that the City intends to continually monitor its assessment of potential impacts. Based on discussions with the Utilities Department, Martin Marietta understands that, if this petition is granted, that Department may wish to relocate some of the monitoring wells Martin Marietta has already agreed to install. It is our further understanding that the proposed development of this sand and gravel operation does not require or implicate any change in the Utilities Department's treatment process for the Plant 4 Wellfield. As it has in the past, Martin Marietta will respond cooperatively to any additional recommendations by the City that may come from its ongoing study of the hydrology of this area. ." Orieinal Comment . The Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan should be expanded to include a discussion ofthe Plant 4 Well field and should include a section to describe how the Plant 4 Wellfield will be protected from spills in and around the Mueller North property. This comment is directly related to the Best Management Practices and Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC) for the proposed water-based operation, and is a part of the mining plan lacking in content and requires a response. The fact the SPCC plan does not address potential impacts to a community water supply is an issue directly related to how the water-based mining plan will protect an important groundwater supply and prevent or mitigate, to the greatest extent practicable, a spill in the sand and gravel operation. As stated on page 7-1 of the application: (7) A storm water pollution prevention plan associated with construction activities. The plan must be designed to, at least, meet the requirements of sections 7 and 7.5 of this rule and must include the following: (H) Material handling and storage associated with construction activity shall meet the spill prevention and spill response requirements in 327 lAC 2-6.1 Based on this citation from Martin Marietta's own application materials, it is obvious spill response is a mandatory part of any SPCC plan. And as such, the methodology for responding to a spill in the water-based sand and gravel operation, and how that response will protect a water supply well from contamination, is an integral part of Spectra's review ofthe viability of the mine plan and requires a response. Specific areas of concern to Spectra are the fuel re-filling protocols for the suction dredge and materials to be stored and used in the event of a spill in the excavation pond. An initial review ofthe SPCC plan indicates that only spills on land are discussed; no discussion is presented of spills in or around the excavation pond. This omission directly relates to the thoroughness ofthe mine plan and is an issue for the Department of Community Services and the City's mining consultant in addition to the Department of Utilities. Response In regard to fuel re-filling protocols for the suction dredge, the same protocols stated on page 17 of the Tank Truck Loading/Unloading section of Martin Marietta's Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan are practiced during re-fueling of the dredge. Additionally, booms are maintained around the dredge to provide additional protection in the event of a spill. Further safeguards include having spill containment kits stored on the dredge, as well as the shoreline, minimizing storage of lubricants on the dredge, and the use of biodegradable hydraulic fluids. A draft of the updated SPCC plan is attached. .. Orhdnal Comment . The information presented does not reference the approved Mueller South sand and gravel operation. Mueller South will be developed as a dry open pit sand and gravel operation with dry reclamation. What are the implications of a dry open pit sand and gravel operation a few hundred feet south of the proposed wet sand and gravel operation? Will the presence of Mueller South reduce lake levels on the Mueller North property during active mining operations and then during and after reclamation? After reclamation, the lake elevation is estimated at +/- 730 feet above mean sea level (amsl). Will the presence of a freely draining sand and gravel face (Mueller South) located a few hundred feet south of Mueller North reduce the anticipated reclamation lake levels? These questions and comments pertain directly to the feasibility of the reclamation plan. The comments are made to determine if the reclamation lake will maintain the purported elevation during reclamation. Ifwater levels in the reclamation lake are reduced by the dewatering mechanisms on Mueller South, then the reclamation plan for Mueller North will need to be reconsidered. Spectra's comments on this topic are directly related to reclamation plan review and require a response. This is not an issue to be solely discussed with the Department of Utilities. Response The Mueller South sand and gravel operation is approximately 575 feet from the nearest point of sand and gravel mining on Mueller North. Martin Marietta's consultants have reviewed the site plans for Mueller North and South, geologic data, and monitoring well data. They are of the opinion that the development of Mueller North will not have a significant impact on reclamation of Mueller South and, further, that the open face at Mueller South will not have a significant impact on lake levels on Mueller North. Orhdnal Comment . The post- mining cross-sections (sheet 6 of6) show that the perimeter of the lake will be excavated to develop a vertical, saturated sand and gravel face 25 feet high at the limit of excavation. There is no description in the documents how this grading will be attained, and if it is attained, how it will be maintained. Saturated sand and gravel below the water line will seek a natural angle of repose at the perimeter of the excavation. Failure in this under-water slope may change the proposed grading of the above water line reclamation slope as well. The excavation plan should be reconsidered near the limit of excavation andthe cross-sections should be redrawn to show a more realistic grading plan around the perimeter of the excavation area. The recent response to this comment states that the cross-sections referenced are "conceptual representations of the maximum extent of extraction. . .." The drawing that offers these sections does not present the sections as "conceptual," nor does the text of the application describe the sections as "conceptual." Because the cross-sections are included as part of the mining and reclamation plans, the sections should present reasonable estimates ofthe operational and final site grades so the actual mine plan can be reviewed. The cross-sections should be re-drawn as originally requested. .. .- Similarly, the typical cross-section C-C' (during mining) on the Landscaping Plan Map, submitted with the response document, shows an equally unrealistic grading plan and should be redrawn. As currently drawn, the grading plan on section C-C' (during mining) on the Landscaping Plan Map, for one, is not labeled "conceptual," and presents a grading plan that is not realistic. As drawn, there is real potential for slope failure propagating all the way to the berm depicted on the section. This section should be re-drawn to present a more realistic grading plan. Response When the submerged sand and gravel material is extracted, it is excavated at a near vertical angle (represented on the cross sections previously provided). However, over time, Martin Marietta acknowledges that this consolidated material will undergo some degree of sloughing underwater. The applicant's experience in extracting sand and gravel deposits in this area has shown that due to the composition of the deposit, the amount of sloughing from such standing faces is minor. The cross-sections (as well as Cross Section C-C' on the Landscape Plan Map) have been revised to indicate some potential sloughing area". This is further minimized by grading the material stored in berms into the lake to stabilize the underwater slopes and establish the 3: 1 final slope to the water line. Additionally, the water line is further stabilized by the construction of the rock (riprap) lining that extends a distance of 2.5 feet above and below the normal water elevation. Therefore, the proposed reclamation grading will not be significantly impacted by any amount of minor sloughing. INDY 1549855v.1 SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, A COUNTERMEASURE PLAN Martin Marietta Aggregates Carmel Sand 11010 Hazel Dell Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46280 Hamilton County, Indiana I hereby certify that I or my designated agent has visited and examined the facility, and being familiar with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 112, attest that this SPCC has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practices, including consideration of applicable industry standards and the requirements of 40 CFR 112, that procedures for required inspections and testing have been established, and that the Plan is adequate for the facility. (Seal) James R. Luckiewicz Printed Name of Registered Professional Engineer Signature of Registered Professional Engineer Registration No.: 890260 State: Indiana Date: April 7. 2003 Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM) Indiana District Office 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Carmel, Indiana 46032 317 -573-4460 Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM) . Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Plan Carmel Sand Table of Contents Plan Certification - 40 CFR 112.3(d)....... ............ .......... ............ ................. General Information. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. Applicability - 40 CFR 112.1.. ..... ... ...... ...... ...... .... ..... .... '" ... ... ....... ....... .... Record of Amendments - 40 CFR 112.5(a) & (c)............................................. Plan Review - 40 CFR 112.5(b).................................................................. Management Approval- 40 CFR 112.7......................................................... Plan Conformance - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(1) & (2) ............................................... Facility Layout - 40 CFR 112.7 (a)(3).......................................................... Discharge Reporting Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7 (a)(4) ..................................... Discharge Countermeasure Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7(a)(5).............................. Equipment Failure and Spill Potential - 40 CFR 112.7(b) ......... ......................... Containment and Diversionary Structures - 40 CFR 112.7(c)(1).... ............ ........... Demonstration of Practicability - 40 CFR 112.7(d) ........................................... Inspections, Tests and Records - 40 CFR 112.7( e) ........................................... Personnel, Training and Discharge Prevention Procedures - 40 CFR 112.7(f) ............ Security - 40 CFR 112.7(g) ...................................................................... Tank Truck Loading/Unloading - 40 CFR 112.7(h).......................................... Field Constructed Containers - 40 CFR 112.7(i).............................................. Conformance with State Programs - 40 CFR 112.7(j). ....... ...... ......................... Facility Drainage - 40 CFR 112.8(b)............................................................. Bulk Storage Containers - 40 CFR 112.8( c).. .... ........ ... .. ........ ... ... .... ... ........ .... Transfer Operations - 40 CFR 112.8(d). .......... ................. .......... ...... .......... Certification of the App. of the Substantial Harm Criteria (40 CFR 112 App. C).... ..... Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement.. ..... .... ... ........... ... ... ... .......... ......... APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Certification of Substantial Harm Determination Form Facility Personnel SPCC Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement Form APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 1: Facility Inspection Log Section 2: Record of Spill Prevention Briefings and Trainings Section 3: Secondary Containment Drainage Log Section 4: Spill Information Form Section 5: Tank Integrity Test Results/Inspections APPENDIX C: Spill Communication Sheet APPENDIX D: Indiana Spill Reporting Requirements (327 lAC 2-6) Federal Oil Spill Reporting Requirements (40 CFR 110) APPENDIX E: Secondary Containment Capacity Calculations APPENDIX F: Facility Site Plan Page No. Cover 1 4 5 5 5 6 6 7 9 9 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 17 18 19 AppA AppA 1. NAME OF FACILITY: Carmel Sand 2. TYPE OF FACILITY: Aggregate mining and production facility supplying graded aggregates to the construction industry. SIC: 1442 NAICS: 212321 3. LOCATION OF FACILITY: 11010 Hazel Dell Parkway Carmel, Indiana 46280 Latitude: 390 56' 22" Longitude: 86004' 33" 4. OWNER AND/OR OPERATOR: Local~anagement Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Indianapolis, IN 46032 (317) 573-4460 Corporate Office Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. P.O. Box 30013 Raleigh, NC 27622-0013 (919) 781-4550 s. OPERATOR IN RESPONSIBLE CHARGE: Jerry Crane, Plant Manager Telephone: (Office) 317-776-4460 (Mobile) 317-319-8044 (Horne) 317-845-7556 6. COMP ANY CONTACTS: A complete listing of company contacts is provided on the following page. 7. LOCATION OF SPCC PLAN: In the Plant Manager's Facility Office 8. GENERAL FACILITY DESCRIPTION: The facility is located off of Hazel Dell Parkway between 106th and 116th Streets in Section 4, Township 17 North, and Range 4 East in Hamilton County, Indiana as shown on Figure 1 on page 3. The White River is located just east of the facility's boundary. The plant currently dredges non-metallic minerals from a man- made water reservoir located on the property. The dredged material is processed through a series of crushers, screens, and conveyors to achieve size reduction for various aggregate grades. The plant supplies processed aggregate to construction companies. 9. SPILLIDSTORY: There have been no reportable spills at this facility since being purchased by Martin Marietta. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page I 6. COMPANY CONTACTS: Contacts at Plant Jerry Crane Plant Manager, Carmel Sand Martin Marietta Aggregates 15215 North River Avenue Noblesville, Indiana 46060 Office phone: 317-776-4460 Mobile phone: 317-319-8044 Home phone: 317-845-7556 Contacts at Indiana District Office John Tiberi Regional Vice President/General Manager Martin Marietta Aggregates 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Telephone: (Office) 317-573-4460 (Mobile) 317-513-7013 (Home) 317-706-0372 Ed Gehr Vice President/General Manager Martin Marietta Aggregates 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Telephone: (Office) 317-573-4460 (Mobile) 317-213-6231 (Home) 317-844-2514 Max Williams, Senior District Engineer Martin Marietta Aggregates 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Telephone: (Office) 317-573-4460 (Mobile) 317-418-2508 (Home) 317-576-9421 Fred Ortb, District Production Manager Martin Marietta Aggregates 1980 East 116th Street, Suite 200 Carmel, Indiana 46032 Telephone: (Office) 317-573-4460 (Mobile) 317-753-3802 (Home) 317-733-8737 Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 2 Figure 1 Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 3 Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plans for facilities are prepared and implemented as required by United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A) regulations contained in Title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 112 (40 CFR 112). The purpose of an SPCC Plan is to form a comparable Federal/State spill prevention program that minimizes the potential for discharges. A non- transportation related facility is subject to the SPCC regulations if: the aboveground storage capacity of the facility exceeds 1,320 gallons; or if the aggregate underground storage capacity exceeds 42,000 gallons (excluding those that are currently subject to all technical requirements of 40 CFR Part 280 or all of the technical requirements of the state programs approved under 40 CFR Part 281); and if, due to its location, the facility could reasonably be expected to discharge oil into or upon the navigable waters of the United States. Only containers with a storage capacity of 55 gallons or greater are included in the calculation of aboveground storage capacity. The SPCC plan is not required to be filed with USEP A, but a copy must be available for on-site review by the Regional Administrator during normal working hours. The SPCC plan must be submitted to the USEP A Regioual Administrator and the applicable state agency, along with other information specified in ~112.4(a) if either of the following occurs: I. The facility has discharged more than 1,000 US gallons of oil in a single discharge as described in ~112.I(b) into or upon the navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines in a single event; 2. The facility has discharged more than 42 US gallons of oil in each of two (2) discharges as described in 9 112. 1 (b) within any twelve (12) month period. The below listed information must be submitted to the USEPA Region V Administrator, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590, Attention: SPCC Coordinator, within sixty (60) days if either of the above thresholds are reached. The report is to contain the following information: I. Name of the facility; 2. Name(s) of the owner and/or operator of the facility; 3. Location of the facility; 4. Maximum storage or handling capacity of the facility and normal daily throughput; 5. Corrective action and countermeasures taken, including description of equipment repairs and/or replacements; 6. A description of the facility, including site and topographic maps, flow diagrams; 7. The cause(s) of such discharge(s), including a failure analysis of system or subsystem in which failure occurred; 8. Additional preventive measures taken or contemplated to minimize the possibility of recurrence; 9. . Such other information as the Regional Administrator may reasonably require pertinent to the Plan or discharge. The SPCC Plan shall be amended within six (6) months where there is a change in facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that materially affects its potential for a discharge. The plan must be reviewed at least once every five (5) years and amended to include more effective prevention and control technology, if such technology has been field-proven at the time of the review and will significantly reduce the likelihood of a discharge. A registered professional engineer must certify all technical changes. Owners and operators failing or refusing to comply with the SPCC regulations shall be subject to a Class I civil penalty in an amount up to $25,000 for a violation or a Class II civil penalty in an amount up to $125,000 for a violation. This language tracks the language in Section 31l(b)(6)(B) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U. S. C. ~1321(b)(6)(B). If the owner and/or operator of a facility is required to prepare an SPCC plan but is not required to submit a Facility Response Plan, the SPCC plan should include a signed certification form, Certification of the Applicability of the Substantial Harm Criteria, which is provided in Appendix A of this Plan. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 4 40 CFR 112.5(a) and (c) requires the SPCC Plan to be amended whenever there is a change in facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance, which materially affects its potential to discharge to navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines. Such amendments to the Plan shall be made within six (6) months of the change, with technical amendments certified by a Professional Engineer (PE). Administrative updates such as name or phone number changes do not require PE certification. 0 10/97 Original Plan development by David A. Hughes Indiana 19905 RCP-SW Ohio 1 11/06/00 Plan u date. D. Max Williams Indiana 16245 2 4/07/03 Plan update in accordance with James R. Indiana 890260 newly amended requirements of Luckiewicz 07/16/02. 3 1/21/05 Personnel and Site Plan changes James R. Indiana 890260 Luckiewicz The owner or operator must complete a review and evaluation of the SPCC plant at least once every five (5) years. The Plan must be amended within six (6) months of the review to include more effective control and prevention technology, if such technology has been field-proven at the time of the review and will significantly reduce the likelihood of a discharge. Signature Date Plan Amended (Y IN) ___.~~~'e_fl'ie_:~'''' <" ""0<"< < < <<<,< <<< < N, < <ii;, <, '< , <<<i< <<<l< ;",< iii < "" ,'<< <"<<< i, ,<, <; <, < iAh: This Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan is fully supported by the management of Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. This Plan will be amended in the event of a change in facility design, construction, operation, or maintenance that could affect its potential to discharge oil into the waters of the United States. John J. Tiberi Vice President/General Manager, Indiana District Date Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 5 This Plan was prepared in general conformance with the minimum standards under 40 CFR 112 and the newly amended requirements published on July 17, 2002. Where there is deviation from any applicable part of this regulation, equivalent environmental protection by other means of prevention, control or countermeasure is provided. ~_iWT.~~'~:l:~:~ A Site Map is provided in Appendix F indicating the physical plant layout, drainage paths, the location of each of the fuel/oil storage containers, loading/unloading areas, and connecting piping regulated by this rule. There are no USTs on-site. The type of oil in each container and its storage capacity is provided in Equipment Failure and Spill Potential [Section 112.7(b)], Table 1 of this Plan. Discharge prevention measures including procedures for routinely handling of products (loading, unloading, and facility transfers, etc.) and discharge/drainage controls are described in the following Sections of this Plan. Countermeasures for discharge discovery, response, and cleanup; methods of disposal of recovered materials in accordance with applicable legal requirements; and contact list and phone numbers for the facility response coordinator, National Response Center, cleanup contractors, and Federal, State and local agencies are provided in the following Sections of this Plan. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 6 The following reporting procedures should be immediately implemented after an oil/fuel discharge (of any size) has occurred. 1. Immediately contact the Plant Manager to report the discharge: Plant Manager: Office Phone Number: Fax Number: Home Phone Number: Jerry Crane 317-776-4460 317-776-4469 317-845-7556 lfthe Plant Manager is not available, contact the Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM) Environmental Contact: MMM Environmental Contact: Office Phone Number: Fax Number: Home Phone Number: Mobile: Max Williams, Senior District Engineer 317-573-4460 317-573-5975 317-576-9421 317-418-2508 2. Based on the size, nature and circumstances of the discharge, the Plant Manager shall contact the Environmental Contact who will notify the appropriate regulatory authorities. In addition, federal SPCC regulations require that any discharge with the potential of reaching a navigable waterway in harmful quantities, as defined in 40 CFR 110.3 (See Appendix D), be immediately reported to the National Response Center (NRC). National Response Center: (800) 424-8802 In accordance with Indiana Water Pollution Board requirements 327 IAC 2-6 (See Appendix D), the Primary Emergency Coordinator will verbally notify within (2) two hours of discovery the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response, Emergency Response Section, 2525 North Shadeland Avenue, P.O. Box 6015, Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015, and in written form if requested. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response, Emergency Response Section: (888) 233-7745 (317) 233-7745 3. In addition to notifying the referenced agencies, the MMM Environmental Contact may also need the services of a spill cleanup contactor such as Spill Recovery Of Indiana, Inc. (317) 291-3972. A prior arrangement must be made with them or any other spill cleanup contractor to secure their immediate response if necessary. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 7 In addition to the Federal and State notifications, and upon verification that an actual spill to a waterway has occurred or probably will occur, the MMM Environmental Contact should also report the spill to the following local contacts: Carmel Fire Department: 911 or 571-2580 Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency: 776-6345 In addition, downstream water users/property owners may also need to be notified. When contacting the above agencies, the following information should be readily available: . Time, location, and source of spill: . Type and quantity of material spilled: . Cause and circumstances of spill: . Hazards associated with the spill: . Personal injuries, if any: . Corrective action taken or planned to be taken: . Name and number of individual reporting spill: . Any additional pertinent information: * REMEMBER TO COMPLETE THE DETAILED SPILL INFORMATION FORM PROVIDED IN APPENDIX B, SECTION 4* Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 8 1. In the event of a discharge, appropriate actions shall be taken to contain the spill using all available means including absorbent materials and readily available mobile equipment. In the event of an uncontained discharge on land, available facility equipment shall immediately construct a containment berm down gradient from the discharge and absorb the discharged material with sand, screenings or agricultural lime on hand at each plant site. This material shall be properly disposed in accordance with applicable environmental regulations at the direction of the MMM Environmental Coordinator or his designee. In the event of an uncontained discharge on water, appropriate absorbent materials will be used to control the spill. These will consist primarily of booms and pads. In the case of a dredge, the booms deployed around the dredge should contain spills around that piece of equipment. If additional materials are required, other appropriate materials such as absorbent booms and pad will be utilized. 2. After containing the discharge, all media (soil, water, etc.) that came into contact with oil must be collected and stored in such a way as not to continue to affect additional media. Examples of proper materials to use for cleanup include adsorbents/absorbents such as: aggregates fines, dirt, absorbent pads, booms, socks, etc. Proper cleanup will be deemed complete when all the objectives of the local, state and/or federal cleanup levels are met. MMM Environmental personnel will handle the determination of proper cleanup levels. 3. Materials that have come into contact with the spilled fluids shall be placed in a temporary staging area until proper methods of disposal can be determined. Sampling of impacted media may be required prior to determining a proper method of disposal. Determining a proper method of disposal will take into consideration all local, state and federal environmental regulatory requirements. MMM Environmental personnel will handle that portion of the cleanup process. 4. In the event of a leak from the tank or piping, as much of the discharge as possible shall be collected manually and stored in an appropriate container until proper disposal or reuse. Immediate action shall be taken to stop or minimize the leak rate. The remaining product in the containment area shall be cleaned up and properly disposed. 5. In the event of a tank, hose or piping failure, arrangements shall be made to empty the tank to a safe level by immediately filling all mobile equipment on the job. The products remaining in the containment shall be handled as described in Item 4. 6. In the event of a fire, the local fire authority shall be contacted immediately. 7. All product containers shall be sealed when not in use with any damaged containers returned to the appropriate vendor. The potential spill sources, locations, directions of release, maximum spill volumes, estimated rate of release, and current secondary containment or other spill abatement methods in place are summarized in Table 1 on the following pages and the locations are highlighted on the Facility Site Plan in Appendix F. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 9 Table 1, page 1 Carmel Sand SPCC April ?, 2003 Page 10 Table 1, page 2 Carmel Sand SPCC April 7. 2003 Page II Table 1, page 3 Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 12 Table 1, page 4 Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 13 Tablet, page 5 Carmel Sand SPCC April?,2003 Page 14 1. The tanks on-site are located within secondary containment structures. The facility has other prevention systems in place. In general, the facility topography is flat such that a spill would likely remain localized near the source. In addition, the site drainage is engineered to drain to the on-site dredge lake that doesn't have a discharge outlet. These areas are visually inspected on a daily basis and spill kit supplies are readily available for containment and cleanup. 2. Secondary containment is not directly provided for tank loading/unloading areas. Tank loading/unloading activities shall be monitored by MMM personnel to reduce spill potential. In general, the site has a flat topography such that spills would likely remain localized and site drainage is engineered to drain to the on-site dredge lake that doesn't have a discharge outlet. These areas are visually inspected on a daily. basis and spill kit supplies including sorbent materials are readily available for containment and cleanup. The facility may also consider providing secondary containment structures for these areas as necessary. 3. Any pumps outside the containment structure and/or piping leading into or out of the containment structure shall be adequately protected. 4. Sorbent materials including pads, booms, etc. are maintained on-site in case of a discharge. In addition, aggregate fines may also suffice to contain/absorb a discharge until it can be properly cleaned up. 5. Secondary containment is not directly provided for the dredge and mobile operating equipment, however, these areas are visually inspected on a daily basis and the facility has other prevention systems in place as described in items (1), (2), and (4) above. 6. Transformers on-site do not have secondary containment but will be visually inspected on a daily basis and the facility has other prevention systems in place as described in items (1), (2), and (4) above. Facility management has determined that use of secondary containment, site topography, diversionary structures, spill cleanup supplies, integrity testing, regular visual inspections, training, and readily available on-site mobile equipment is practical and effective to prevent a discharge of petroleum products from reaching navigable waters at this facility. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 15 1. Daily visual inspections consist of a complete walkthrough of the facility grounds to check for tank damage or leakage, transformer leakage, stained or discolored soils, an oil sheen in the dredge lake area, excessive accumulation of precipitation within diked areas, and to ensure the containment drain valve(s) are securely closed. All electrical items containing dielectric fluid shall be periodically checked for leaks. Appropriate labels identifying the fluid contained in the item shall be affixed to the outside of the item in clear view. 2. The Facility Inspection Log provided in Appendix B, Section 1 is used during monthly inspections and should be completed by the Plant Manager, or other personnel under his direct supervision. Records of these inspections, along with any corrective actions taken should be maintained on-site for a continuous three (3) year period. 'Ill J~;IlARGE rREVE~TlbN).)ROC : t>l1RE~ 49 (;tR 1. Oil-handling personnel are trained in the operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent discharges; discharge procedure protocols; applicable pollution control laws and regulations; general facility operations; and the contents of the facility SPCC Plan. 2. The Plant Manager or his secondary appointee, has primary responsibility for oil spill prevention. 3. Initial training and subsequent briefings are to be provided by management for all oil- handling personnel to ensure adequate understanding of the components of this SPCC Plan and its requirements. Such components consisting of spill prevention and cleanup, inspection of equipment and AST integrity will be provided at a minimum of once per year, typically during Annual Refresher training. New employees who will serve as oil- handling personnel shall be trained as soon as possible. A Record of Spill Prevention Briefings and Trainings is provided in Appendix B, Section 2 of this Plan. 1. Fencing, or other alternative means of access restriction is provided, where appropriate, to deter unauthorized entry. The site is not entirely fenced due to its large area, however, the site is inspected on a daily basis. 2. Master flow and drain valves are to be locked in the closed position except during authorized containment drainage. 3. Electrical starter controls for the oil pumps are to be locked in the "off' position and are to be located in an area accessible only to authorized personnel when the pumps are in a non-operating status. 4. The loading and unloading connections of oil piping are capped when not in service or when in standby service for an extended period of time. 5. Lighting is commensurate with the type and location of the facility and is sufficient to provide rapid discovery of spills during hours of darkness by both operating and non- operating (police, fire, rescue, etc.) personnel and to discourage vandalism. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 16 1. Secondary containment is not directly provided for tank loading/unloading areas. Tank loading/unloading activities shall be monitored by MMM personnel to reduce spill potential. In general, the site has a flat topography such that spills would likely remain localized and site drainage is engineered to drain to the on-site dredge lake that doesn't have a discharge outlet. These areas are visually inspected on a daily basis and spill kit supplies including sorbent materials are readily available for containment and cleanup. The facility may also consider providing secondary containment structures for these areas as necessary. Martin Marietta personnel will be stationed on the dredge while it is being fueled. The supplier will remain stationed at his truck during this period. 2. A vendor's tank truck unloading procedures shall meet the minimum requirements and regulations established by the Department of Transportation's Regulations contained under49CFR 171,173,174, 177, and 179. 3. A physical barrier, warning sign, or wheel chocks, shall be provided in loading/unloading areas to deter vehicles from departing before complete disconnection of oil transfer lines. It is the vendor's responsibility to ensure that a safety cone is placed before unloading and removed after disconnect is complete. 4. In instances where fueling/lubricating of company equipment can only occur outside of secondary containment, a spill containment kit shall be available. This kit shall be kept on the vehicle providing the fuel/oil. 5. The fueled/lubricated vehicle's lowermost drain plug, along with any other leak outlet, shall be examined after filling and before leaving the service area. 6. Delivery tankers should be inspected before and after unloading to verify quantity received. Drivers are to remain with their tankers during the entire unloading period. Petroleum product vendors shall provide some means to clean up any incidental spillage. 7. Equipment operators are to remain with their equipment at all times during refueling. This section is not applicable The discharge prevention and containment standards are in general conformance with the minimum standards under 40 CFR 112 and all applicable State rules, regulations and guidelines. 1. Drainage from containment areas is restrained to prevent a discharge from entering into the facility's drainage system. The condition of accumulation is inspected prior to emptying diked areas to ensure that no oil will be discharged. The dikes are emptied by either manually pumping from the dike or discharging through restraining valves. Valves of open-and-closed manual design are used to drain diked areas. The exterior drainage valve is equipped with a locking device and should only be unlocked and opened to drain accumulated precipitation in accordance with the Secondary 2. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 17 Containment Drainage Log (Appendix B, Section 3). After drainage is complete, re- locking of the drainage valve is mandatory. Carmel Sand SPCC April?,2003 Page 18 \ 3. In the event of a discharge and/or overflow from a tank, the discharge should be contained within the containment structure. If a spill occurs during transfer, or in a manner that cannot be contained within the diked area, surface drainage is as indicated on the Site Plan in Appendix F. In general, the site drainage is engineered to direct runoff into the on-site dredge lake area that doesn't have a discharge outlet. 4. In general, the facility topography is flat such that a spill would likely remain localized near the source. In addition, the facility drainage has been engineered to direct runoff into the on-site dredge lake that does not have a discharge outlet. These areas are visually inspected on a daily basis and spill kit supplies including sorbent materials are readily available to control and cleanup any spills. 1. Each aboveground tank is constructed of a material (Carbon Steel) that is compatible with the material stored within and the conditions (atmospheric) of storage (e.g. pressure, temperature, etc.) 2. The aboveground tanks are provided with secondary containment with an available storage volume sufficient to contain the capacity for the largest single tank stored within, plus sufficient freeboard for precipitation (i.e. 25 years, 24 hour storm event). The freeboard for precipitation is only required for installations without roof structure(s). Some of the tanks are located under canopy. Secondary containment capacity calculations are provided in Appendix E. 3. Drainage of rainwater from diked areas, bypassing treatment, is acceptable if: t. The bypass valve is normally sealed closed. 11. Accumulated precipitation is inspected to ensure compliance with applicable water quality standards and will not cause a harmful discharge as described in ~112.1(b). 111. The bypass valve is opened and resealed under responsible supervision. tv. Records are kept of drainage events on the form shown in Appendix B, Section 3 of this Plan. . 4. There are no underground tanks at this facility. 5. There are no partially buried tanks at this facility. 6. Aboveground tanks are visually inspected on a daily basis. Documented visual inspections are to be performed monthly in accordance with the Facility Inspection Log in Appendix B, Section 1 and should include inspection of the tank(s), tank supports and foundations, and containment structure(s). Aboveground containers are to be tested for integrity in accordance with industry standards (API 653 and STI SPOOI-03) on a regular schedule, or at least every five (5) years, using a system of non-destructive testing such as hydrostatic testing, radiographic testing, ultrasonic testing, acoustic emissions testing, etc. Test comparison records are also to be kept in Appendix B, Section 5 of this Plan. 7. There are no steam operated internal heating coils at this facility. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 19 8. Each AST has been engineered or updated in accordance with good engineering practices to provide overfill protection, preferably by the presence of a direct-reading level gauge. Other acceptable means of level gauging include high liquid level alarms, high level pump cutoffs, and overflow lines. MMM personnel visually monitor liquid levels prior to and during filling activities. 9. There are no "effluent treatment facilities" at this facility. 10. Visible discharges which result in a loss of oil from the container (including seams, gaskets, piping, pumps, valves, rivets, bolts, etc.) must be promptly collected and any accumulations of oil properly removed. 11. Any mobile or portable oil storage container, including 55-gallon drums, shall be located to prevent a discharge of oil and provided with secondary containment that may be accomplished by natural topography, diversion berms or catch basins and are to be located in areas not subject to periodic flooding. 1. There is no buried piping at this facility. Buried piping installed after August 16, 2002 will have a protective wrapping and coating and be cathodically protected. 2. Buried piping shall be integrity tested at a minimum every 10 years using air pressure or as warranted by the certifying engineer. 3. Piping not in service or on standby for an extended period shall be capped and marked at the terminal connection. 4. All pipe supports are properly designed to minimize abrasion and corrosion and to allow for expansion and contraction. 5. Above ground valves, piping and appurtenances are visually inspected by operating personnel on a daily basis. The general condition of items including joints, pipeline supports, catch pans, locking valves and metal surfaces are to be assessed. Documented visual inspections are performed monthly in accordance with the Facility Inspection Log (Appendix B, Section 1). 6. There is no aboveground piping or other oil transfer operations located within vehicle travel areas. In addition, verbal warnings are administered as needed as to the location of oil storage operations. All vehicles entering the facility are warned so that aboveground piping or other oil transfer operations are not endangered. Carmel Sand SPCC April 7, 2003 Page 20 APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Certification of Substantial Harm Determination Form Facility Personnel SPCC Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement Form APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 1: Facility Inspection Log Section 2: Record of Spill Prevention Briefings and Trainings Section 3: Secondary Containment Drainage Log Section 4: Spill Information Form Section 5: Tank Integrity Test Results/Inspections APPENDIX C: Spill Communication Sheet APPENDIX D: Indiana Spill Reporting Requirements (327 lAC 2-6) Federal Oil Spill Reporting Requirements (40 CFR 110) APPENDIX E: Secondary Containment Capacity Calculations APPENDIX F: Facility Site Plan APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Certification of Substantial Harm Determination Form Facility Personnel SPCC Plan Understanding and Acknowledgement Form Facility Name: Carmel Sand Facility Address: 11010 Hazel Dell Parkway. Carmel. Indiana 46280 1. Does the facility transfer oil over water to or from vessels and does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 42,000-gallons? Yes No ./ 2. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal 1 million gallons and does the facility lack secondary containment that is sufficiently large to contain the capacity of the largest aboveground oil storage tank plus sufficient freeboard to allow for precipitation within any aboveground oil storage tank area? Yes No ./ 3. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in Attachment C-III to this appendix or a comparable formula!) such that a discharge from the facility could cause injury to fish and wildlife and sensitive environments? For further description of fish and wildlife and sensitive environments, see Appendices I. II, and III to DOC/NOAA's "Guidance for Facility and Vessel Response Plans: Fish and Wildlife and Sensitive Environments: (see Appendix E to this part, section 10, for availability) and the applicable Area Contingency Plan. Yes No ./ 4. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and is the facility located at a distance (as calculated using the appropriate formula in Attachment C-III to this appendix or a comparable formula!) such that a discharge from the facility would shut down a public drinking water intake2? Yes No ./ 5. Does the facility have a total oil storage capacity greater than or equal to 1 million gallons and has the facility experienced a reportable oil spill in an amount greater than or equal to 10,000 gallons within the last 5 years? Yes No ./ Certification: I certify that under penalty of law that I have personally examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document, and that based on my inquiry of those individuals responsible for obtaining this information, I believe that the submitted information is true, accurate, and complete. Signature D. Max Williams Name (please type or print) Senior District Engineer Title Date IIfa comparable formula is used documentation of the reliability and analytical soundness of the comparable formula must be attached. 2For the purposes of 40 CFR part 112, public drinking water intakes are analogous to public water systems as described at 40 CFR 143.2 (c). CARMEL SAND I have read this Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure Plan and agree to adhere to and perform the activities required by the plan to the best of my ability. Any part of the plan to which I do not understand, I have contacted the Environmental Department for guidance. Plant Manager: Date: Foreman: Date: Other: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: Date: APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 1: Facility Inspection Log Section 2: Record of Spill Prevention Briefings and Trainings. Section 3: Secondary Containment Drainage Log Section 4: Spill Information Form Section 5: Tank Integrity Test ResultslInspections APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 1: Facility Inspection Log FACILITY INSPECTION LOG (page 1 of2) Instructions: This record should be completed monthlv. VisuaIly inspect each item, placing an ~ in the appropriate box for each item. If any item needs explanation, do so in the space provided, or attach additional sheet if necessary. DATE: INSPECTOR: LOCATION: CARMEL SAND CORRECTIVE ACTION/COMMENTS Tanks No(s). YES NO N/A Drip Marks Discoloration of Tanks Puddles Containing Spilled or Leaked Material Corrosion Cracks Localized Dead Vegetation Level Indicator(s) Functioning Audible I Visual Alarm(s) Functioning Containment No(s). Cracks Discoloration Presence of Spilled or Leaked Material Settling Gaps Between Tank and Foundation Damage Caused by Vegetation Roots Accumulated Precipitation Piping Droplets of Stored Material Discoloration Corrosion Bowing of Pipe Between Supports Evidence of Seepage From Valves or Seals Localized Dead Vegetation General comments FACILITY INSPECTION LOG (page 2 of2) Instructions: This record should be completed monthlv. Visually inspect each item, placing an::t... in the appropriate box for each item. If any item needs explanation, do so in the space provided, or attach additional sheet if necessary. DATE: INSPECTOR: LOCATION: CARMEL SAND CORRECTIVE ACTION/COMMENTS Tanks No(s). Loading/unloading areas YES NO N/A Discoloration on ground Puddles Containing Spilled or Leaked Material Localized Dead Vegetation 55 gallon or larger drums and totes on-site Corrosion Discoloration on ground/localized dead vegetation Puddles of spilled/leaked materials on ground General comments Transformer(s). . Corrosion Discoloration on ground Presence of Spilled or Leaked Material Localized Dead Vegetation Roots Mobile Equipment Puddles of Spilled/Leaked Material Discoloration on ground/Localized dead vegetation General comments Dredge operating satisfactorily Oil sheen present General comments Site Drainage Features; culverts, ditches, Dredge Lake Oil sheen present Discoloration on ground Localized Dead Vegetation General comments Miscellaneous Spill Kits stocked and in correct locations Facility fencing, lighting needs repair/replacement General comments APPENDICES APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 2: Record of Spill Prevention Briefings and Trainings RECORD OF SPILL PREVENTION BRIEFINGS Instruction: Briefings will be scheduled and conducted by the owner or operators for operating personnel at intervals frequent enough to assure adequate understanding of the SPCC Plan for this facility. These briefings should also highlight and describe known spill events or failures, malfunctioning components, and recently developed precautionary measures. Personnel will also be instructed in operation and maintenance of equipment to prevent the discharges of oil and applicable pollution control laws, rules and regulations. During these briefmgs there will be an opportunity for facility operators and other personnel to share recommendations concerning health, safety, and environmental issues encountered during operation of the facility. Date: Plant: CARMEL SAND Attendees: Subject and Issues: Recommendations and suggestions: APPENDICES APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 3: Secondary Containment Drainage Log CARMEL SAND SECONDARY CONTAINMENT DRAINAGE LOG 40 CFR 112 REQUIRES A CONTINUOUS WATCH WHEN DRAINING RAIN WATER FROM ANY PETROLEUM SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FACILITY. ANY OIL PRESENT ON THE WATER SURFACE MUST BE REMOVED PRIOR TO OPENING THE DISCHARGE VALVE. IT IS IMPORTANT TO KEEP THE STRUCTURE CLEAN AND WELL MAINTAINED TO AVOID OIL CONTAMINATION. MY SIGNATURE BELOW CERTIFIES THAT 1 HAVE EXAMINED THE CONTAINMENT FACILITY, REMOVED ANY VISIBLE OIL FROM THE WATER SURFACE, REPAIRED OR REPORTED ALL LEAKS, AND CLOSED AND LOCKED THE CONTAINMENT DRAIN VALVE PRIOR TO DEPARTURE. "~ Oill'resent Dr~n ()pen~d Drain Closed Volume I}!, ~ Date (, --"1- (YeslN~) (Time) (Time) (gall Si2natUte Location *THIS RECORD MUST BE KEPT ON FILE FOR A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) YEARS. *To approximate the volume of water drained from the structure, multiply the depth of standing water by the containment dimensions (all dimensions should be in feet). Multiply the volume by 7.48 to convert to gallons. APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 4: Spill Information Form SPILL INFORMATION FORM Facility Location: Owner/Operator: Name: Cannel Sand Address: Person to Contract: Telephone: Name: Address: Telephone: Discharl!e Incident: -Location and Source: -Date and Time: -Cause of Release: -Material Involved: -Volume Discharged: -Injuries (if any): -Hazards to health or environment: Response: Preventive Measures: Corrective Actions: Comments: Facility Description (Attach maps if necessary): Reported to: Reported by: Name: Organization: Telephone: Name: Organization: Telephone: APPENDIX B: Facility Documentation Section 5: Tank Integrity Test ResultslInspections APPENDICES APPENDIX C: Spill Communication Sheet SPILL COMMUNICATION SHEET The following reporting procedures should be immediately implemented after an oil/fuel discharge (of any size) has occurred. 1. Immediately contact the Plant Manager to report the discharge: Plant Manager: Office Phone Number: Fax Number: Home Phone Number: Mobile Jerry Crane 317-776-4460 317-776-4469 317-845-7556 317-319-8044 If the Plant Manager is not available, contact the Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. (MMM) Environmental Contact: MMM Environmental Contact: Office Phone Number: Fax Number: Home Phone Number: Mobile: Max Williams, Senior District Engineer 317-573-4460 317-573-5975 317-576-9421 317-418-2508 2. Based on the size, nature and circumstances of the discharge, the Plant Manager shall contact the Environmental Contact who will notify the appropriate regulatory authorities. In addition, federal SPCC regulations require that any discharge with the potential of reaching a navigable waterway in harmful quantities, as defined in 40 CFR 110.3 (See Appendix D), be immediately reported to the National Response Center (NRC). National Response Center: (800) 424-8802 In accordance with Indiana Water Pollution Board requirements 327 lAC 2-6 (See Appendix D), the Primary Emergency Coordinator will verbally notify within (2) two hours of discovery the Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response, Emergency Response Section, 2525 North Shadeland Avenue, P.O. Box 6015, Indianapolis, Indiana 46206-6015, and in written form if requested. Indiana Department of Environmental Management, Office of Environmental Response, Emergency Response Section: (888) 233-7745 (317) 233-7745 3. In addition to notifying the referenced agencies, the MMM Environmental Contact may also need the services of a spill cleanup contactor such as Spill Recovery Of Indiana, Inc. (317) 291- 3972. A prior arrangement must be made with them or any other spill cleanup contractor to secure their immediate response if necessary. 4. In addition to the Federal and State notifications, and upon verification that an actual spill to a waterway has occurred or probably will occur, the MMM Environmental Contact should also report the spill to the following local contacts: Carmel Fire Department: 911 or 571-2580 Hamilton County Emergency Management Agency: 776-6345 In addition, downstream water users/property owners may also need to be notified. APPENDICES APPENDIX D: Indiana Spill Reporting Requirements (327 lAC 2-6) Federal Oil Spill Reporting Requirements (40 CFR 110) APPENDICES APPENDIX E: Secondary Containment Capacity Calculations APPENDICES APPENDIX F: Facility Site Plan Table l-Carmel Sand Spill Potential (page 1 of 5) Potential Location and Direction Maximum Estimated Rate Containment Comments/Recommendations Spill of Spill Volume of Release Volume Source Release (Gallons) (gpm) (Gallons) 1. 1000 gallon Diesel Just south of scale area, 1,000 o minimum to 1,000+ Tank is located within 10 MMM personnel shall inspect this Fuel Tank, horizontal, Location I on Site Plan- maximum ft by 7.83 ft by 1.75 ft area on a daily basis. See Bulk carbon steel, within steel Appendix F, outside, spill steel containment Storage Containers (40 CFR dike under canopy would be contained within structure;approx.l025 112.8(c)) in this Plan for further steel dike gallon containment details. capacity IA. 1000 gallon Diesel Just south of scale area, Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment structure MMM personnel shall monitor all Fuel Tank Location lA on Site Plan- compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Loading/unloading area Appendix F, outside, spill volume ::t 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 would likely remain localized gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)l) in this Plan for or could runoff into nearby controlled drainage and further details. on-site Dredge Lake spill supplies/sorbent materials. 2.250 gallon Used Oil Moved to area just west of 250 o minimum to 250 Tank is located within MMM personnel shall inspect this Tank, horizontal, carbon the 1000 gallon diesel fuel maximum circular 7.5 ft diameter area on a daily basis. See Bulk steel, within steel dike tank, Location 2 on Site by 1.75 ft deep steel Storage Containers (40 CFR Plan-Appendix F, outside; containment structure; 112.8(c)) in this Plan for further spill would be contained approx. 578 gallon details. within steel dike. containment capacity 2A. 250 gallon Used Oil Moved to area just west of Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment structure MMM personnel shall monitor all Tank, the 1000 gallon diesel fuel compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Loading/unloading area tank, Location 2A on Site volume ::t 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 Plan-Appendix F, outside, gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)l) in this Plan for spill would likely remain controlled drainage and further details. localized or could runoff into spill supplies/sorbent nearby on-site Dredge Lake materials. Table l-Carmel Sand Spill Potential (page 2 of 5) Potential Location and Direction Maximum Estimated Rate Containment CommentslRecommendations Spill of Spill Volume of Release Volume Source Release (GaUons) (gpm) (GaUons) 3.2- 275 gallon Oil Moved to area just west of 275 each o minimum to 275+ Tanks are located within MMM personnel shall inspect this Lubricant Tanks; the 1000 gallon diesel fuel maximum 7.5 ft by 6 ft by 1.75 ft area on a daily basis. See Bulk vertical, carbon steel tank, Location 3 on Site concrete containment Storage Containers (40 CFR within steel dike Plan-Appendix F, outside, struchrre;approx.589 112.8(c)) in this Plan for further spill would be contained gallon containment details. within steel dike capacity 3A. 2- 275 gallon Oil Moved to area just west of Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment struchrre MMM personnel shall monitor all. Lubricant Tanks the 1000 gallon diesel fuel compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Loading/unloading area tank, Location 3A on Site volume::!: 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 Plan-Appendix F, outside, gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)1) in this Plan for spill would likely remain controlled drainage and further details. localized or could runoff spill supplies/sorbent into nearby on-site Dredge materials. Lake \ - 4. Process Equipment-- Location 4 on Site Plan- 2-1500 gallon o minimum to 1500 No containment struchrre The dredge shall be visually inspected Diesel Dredge Fuel Appendix F, outside spill fuel tanks maximum is present, however, other on a daily basis. Tanks would likely remain prevention systems are in localized near Dredge place including controlled drainage and spill supplies/sorbent materials. 4A. Process Equipment- Location 4A on Site Plan- Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment struchrre MMM personnel shall monitor all -Dredge Diesel Fuel Appendix F, outside, spill compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Tank Loading/unloading would likely remain volume::!: 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 area (Fueled by localized near Dredge gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)1) in this Plan for Vendors) controlled drainage and further details. spill supplies/sorbent materials. II Table l--Carmel Sand Spill Potential (page 3 of 5) Potential Location and Direction Maximum Estimated Rate Containment CommentslRecommendations Spill of Spill Volume of Release Volume Source Release (Gallons) (gpm) (Gallons) 5. 10-55 gallon oil Drums moved to trailer on 55 o minimum to 55 Located within trailer; MMM personnel shall inspect this drum storage area southeast side of Plant maXImum No containment structure area on a daily basis. See Bulk within shipping trailer, adjacent to hopper, Location is present, however, other Storage Containers (40 CFR total cumulative volume 5 on Site Plan-Appendix F, prevention systems are in 112.8(c)) in this Plan for further 550:!: gallons within shed; spill would place including details. likely remain localized or controlled drainage and runoff into on-site Dredge spill supplies/sorbent Lake materials. 6. Electric Near entrance trailer and <100 o minimum to <100 No containment structure MMM personnel shall inspect these Transformers scale area, Location 6 on maXImum is present, however, other areas on a daily basis. Site Plan-Appendix F, prevention systems are in outside, spill would likely place including remain localized or could controlled drainage and runoff into nearby on-site spill supplies/sorbent Dredge Lake materials. 7. Process Equipment-- Location 7 on Site Plan- 85 hydraulic oil; o minimum to 85 No containment structure The dredge shall be visually inspected Diesel Dredge Appendix F, spill would 60 lubricating maXImum is present, however, other on a daily basis. Hydraulic Oil tank and likely remain localized near oil prevention systems are in lubricating oil tank Dredge place including controlled drainage and spill supplies/sorbent materials. 7 A. Process Equipment- Location 7 A on Site Plan- Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment structure MMM personnel shall monitor all -Diesel Dredge Appendix F, spill would compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Hydraulic Oil tank and likely remain localized near volume:t 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck Loading/Unloading (40 lubricating oil tank Dredge gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)1) in this Plan for loading/unloading area controlled drainage and further details. spill supplies/sorbent materials. Table l-Carmel Sand Spill Potential (page 4 of 5) Potential Location and Direction Maximum Estimated Rate Containment Comments/Recommendations Spill of Spill Volume of Release Volume Source Release (Gallons) (gpm) (Gallons) . 8. (2) Front End South of scale area, . Maximum o minimum to 100 No containment structure The equipment shall be visually Loaders diesel fuel Location 8 on Site Plan- compartment maximum is present, however, other inspected on a daily basis. tanks Appendix F, outside, spill volume:!: 100 prevention systems are in would likely remain localized gallons place including or could runoff into nearby controlled drainage and on-site Dredge Lake spill supplies/sorbent materials. 8A. (2) Front End South of scale area, Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment structure MMM personnel shall monitor all Loaders diesel fuel Location 8A on Site Plan- compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See tanks loading/unloading Appendix F, spill would volume:!: 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 area likely remain localized or gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)l) in this Plan for could runoff into nearby on- controlled drainage and further details. site Dredge Lake spill supplies/sorbent materials. 9. 250 gallon Unleaded Just south of scale area, 250 o minimum to 250 Tank is located within MMM personnel shall inspect this Gasoline Tank, . Location 9 on Site Plan- maximum 7.83 ft by 3.83 ft by 1.75 area on a daily basis. See Bulk horizontal, carbon steel, Appendix F, outside; spill ft steel containment Storage Containers (40 CFR within steel dike would be contained within structure; approx. 393 112.8@) in this Plan for further steel dike. gallon containment details. capacity (containment height increased by 3 inches on 04/01104) 9A. 250 gallon Used Oil Just south of scale area, Maximum o minimum to 2000 No containment structure MMM personnel shall monitor all Tank, Location 9A on Site Plan- compartment maximum is present, however, other loading/unloading activities. See Loading/unloading area Appendix F, outside, spill volume:!: 2000 prevention systems are in Tank Truck LoadinglUnloading (40 would likely remain localized gallons place including CFR 112.7(h)l) in this Plan for or could runoff into nearby controlled drainage and further details. on-site Dredge Lake spill supplies/sorbent materials. Table l--Carmel Sand Spill Potential (page 5 of 5) THE CUMULATIVE TOTAL OIL/PETROLEUM CAPACITY AT CARMEL SAND IS: Tanks on site storage: 2050 gallons Transformers on site (most less than 55 gallons) estimate 500 gallons for those large than 55 gallons 55 gallon drums on-site, estimate 10 drums for a total of550 gallons Mobile equipment, counting those with tanks larger than 55 gallons, is 3345 gallons AGGREGATE SITE TOTAL (55 GALLON CONTAINERS AND GREATER) = 6445 GALLONS SPCC PLAN SECONDARY CONTAINMENT CALCULATIONS 01/21/05 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC. (MMM) CARMEL SAND 11010 HAZEL DELL PARKWAY CARMEL, IN 46280 1. 1000 gallon diesel fuel tank, just south of scale area within steel dike under canopy Dimensions: 10 ft by 7.83 ft by 1.75 ft Capacity = 10 ft x 7.83 ft x 1.75 ft x 7.48 gallons/ff = 1025 gallons Therefore, containment needed = 1000 gallons And containment present = 1025 gallons 1A. 1000 gallon diesel fuel tank loading/unloading area; no containment present; this area would likely drain to the surface water impoundment. 2. 250 gallon used oil tank in outside circular steel dike, located just west of the diesel fuel tank #1 on 1/17/05 Dimensions: 7.5 ft diameter by 1.75 ft depth Capacity = n(7.5 ft)2/4 x 1.75 ft x 7.48 gallons/ff = 578 gallons 25 year storm volume = 4.8 in.l12 in/ft x n(7.5 ft)2/4 x 7.48 gallons/ff =132 gallons Therefore, containment needed = 250 gallons + 132 gallons = 382 gallons And containment present = 578 gallons 2A. 250 gallon used oil tank loading/unloading area; no containment present; this area would likely drain to the surface water impoundment. 3. 2-275 gallon oil lubricant tanks, located just west of the diesel fuel tank #1 on 1/17/05, within outside steel dike Dimensions: 7.5 ft by 6 ft by 1.75 ft Capacity = 7.5 ft x 6 ft x 1.75 ft x 7.48 gallons/ff = 589 gallons 25 year storm volume = 4.8 in./12 in/ft x 7.5 ft x 6 ft x 7.48 gallons/ff =134.6 gallons Therefore, containment needed = 275 gallons + 134.6 gallons = 409.6 gallons And containment present = 589 gallons 3A. 2-275 gallon oil lubricant tanks loading/unloading area; no containment present; this area would likely drain to the surface water impoundment. 4. 2-1500 gallon fuel tanks on dredge; no containment present and spill would likely drain to the surface water impoundment. 4A. 2-1500 gallon fuel tanks on dredge loading/unloading area; no containment present and spill would likely drain to the surface water impoundment. 5. 10-55 gallon oil drums stored within the shipping trailer on the southeast side of the Plant adjacent to the hopper; no containment present and spill would likely remain localized or drain to the surface water impoundment; oil absorbent materials are on hand. (55 gallon drums are no longer stored in shed on peninsula.) 6. Electric transformers with less than 100 gallons capacity; no containment present but spill would likely remain localized or runoff into nearby surface water impoundment. 7. Dredge; 85 gallon hydraulic oil tank and 60 gallon lubricating oil tank; no containment present but spill would likely remain localized or runoff into nearby surface water impoundment. 7 A. Dredge oil tank and lubricating oil tank loading/unloading area; no containment present but spill would likely remain localized or runoff into nearby surface water impoundment. 8. 100 gallon diesel fuel tanks in two (2) front end loaders; no containment present but spill would likely remain localized or runoff into nearby surface water impoundment. 8A. Loading/unloading area of 100 gallon diesel fuel tanks in two (2) front end loaders; no containment present but spill would likely remain localized or runoff into nearby surface water impoundment 9. 250 gallon unleaded gasoline tank in outside steel dike, located just south of the scale area Dimensions: 7.83 ft by 3.83 ft by 1.75 ft depth (height was increased by 3 inches on 04/01/04) Capacity = (7.83 ft) x 3.83 ft by 1.75 ft x 7.48 gallons/fe = 392.6 gallons 25 year storm volume = 4.8 in./12 in/ft x 7.83 ft x 3.83 ft x 7.48 gallons/fe =90 gallons Therefore, containment needed = 250 gallons + 90 gallons = 340 gallons And containment present = 392.6 e:allons 9A. 250 gallon unleaded gasoline tank loading/unloading area; no containment present; spill would remain localized or would likely drain to the surface water impoundment.