HomeMy WebLinkAboutResponses to Sept 26, 2005 TAC meeting
AA
Martin Marietta Aggregates
Indiana District Office
1980 East 11 6th Street
Suite 200
Carmel, IN 46032
Telephone (317) 573-4460
Fax (317) 573-5975
Mr. Michael Hollibaugh
Director, Department of Community Services
City of Carmel, City Hall
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
November 9,2005
RE: Responses to Comments Provided During the September 26,2005 lAC Meeting for
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation
Dear Mr. Hollibaugh:
This letter and attachments address the various issues discussed during the T AC meeting on
September 26, 2005. Typed below is each of the comments from the referenced comment letters.
Beneath each comment is Martin Marietta's response the comment in bold type.
If you require additional information feel free to contact me at 317-573-4460.
Enclosures
Three additional copies with attachments
cc: J. Tiberi (w/o enc.)
Y. Bailey (w/o enc.)
W. Phears (w/o enc.)
Z. Weiss (w/o enc.)
~'
Martin Marietta Aggregates
~
Indiana District Office
1980 East 116th Street
Suite 200
Carmel, IN 46032
Telephone (317) 573-4460
Fax (317) 573-5975
November 8, 2005
/~
t!!;./
F~,
\~":
"
\ .
'~~!j.......
-.;;:;:,
. ,
-f"
__.-e- ;
~.
. :.-'-'" \,
:,,'j ~'
Mr. Michael Hollibaugh
Director, Department of Community Services
City of Carmel, City Hall
One Civic Square
Carmel, Indiana 46032
;%" ..
,;;.' "-
," "-./
/~
, ?~
\\-q-o,S
RE: Additional Information for the Application for Board of Zoning Appeals Action
Special Use Approval Request - Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation
And Artificial Lake (Dated: September 2005)
Dear Mr. Hollibaugh:
This Additional Information Package is intended to supplement and in some cases clarify information
previously submitted by Martin Marietta in its application and should be read in conjunction with such
previously submitted materials. The intent of this Additional Information Package is not to supersede
the original application, the provisions of which shall continue to control and be a part of this
application except where inconsistent with any supplemental information herein. In the event of any
inconsistency, the provisions of the Additional Information Package shall be controlling.
If you require additional information feel free to contact me at 317-573-4460.
-<
Enclosures
cc: J. Tiberi (w/o enc.)
Y. Bailey (w/o enc.)
W. Phears (w/o enc.)
Z. Weiss (w/o enc.)
~~
1'.':: ...._-llo
\\-q-o~
i
MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RESPONSE TO OCTOBER 26, 2005 S~CTRA -:;~\
COMMENTS IN CONNECTION WITH THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE '::-9,0
APPROVAL MUELLER PROPERTY SOUTH SURFACE LIMESTONE OPE'RATION . -
~ ':-
.' '>-.,
'-,r' " ~....( ,
Comment 1: The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (SpeC), dated
April, 2003, does not specifically mention that it covers and is the controlling document
over excavation activities on Mueller Property South. Mueller Property South is included
in the document only as a property outline on a figure in the report. The plan also does
not state whether or not it is the Mueller South sand and gravel operation that is
covered by the SPCC plan or the Mueller South Limestone operation.
Response to Comment 1 :
The Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures Plan (SPCC), dated April 1,
2003 was developed to encompass the Mueller Property South parcel as part of
the North Indianapolis facility. The SPCC Facility Site Plan map has been
updated to reflect the parcels and facilities governed by the plan.
Comment 2: The SPCC Facility Site Plan by ATC Associates, Inc., last revised July 19,
2005, is not included in the list of revisions on page 5 of the SPCC plan. The list of plan
updates should reflect all revisions to the SPCC plan.
Response to Comment 2:
Although there was been no physical change in the facility that would affect the
applicability of the SPCC Plan, the "Record of Amendments" section on page 5
has been updated to include the insertion of the April 2005 photograph base
(previous copies had the April 2004 photograph base), Mueller Property South
delineation, property line updated and power line symbol added. A copy of the
SPCC Plan "Record of Amendments" section page 5 is attached along with the
updated Facility Site Plan map.
Comment 3: As explained in the TAC meeting, the Additional Information for the
Mueller Property South Surface Limestone Operation and Artificial Lake, dated
September 2005, is intended to expand upon the original application materials
submitted in 2002. The Additional Information, however, does not reference the original
application materials or explain in any way how the current information expands on or
modifies the original application. There needs to be better continuity between the two
submittals.
10:30 C{fV) / ~\J, q I ZOOS
'i
Response to Comment 3:
As Spectra correctly notes, the Additional Information for the Mueller Property
South Surface Limestone Operation and Artificial lake ("Additional Information
Package"), dated September 2005, was prepared to respond to prior comments
and/or to supplement information provided with the original application
submitted in December 2002. The intent of the Additional Information Package
was to submit a more comprehensive package with additional information that
was both responsive to previous comments and would facilitate review of the
current application during the TAC process. Specifically, some of the additional
information includes the following:
. Addition of existing topographic contours to the maps
. Minor modifications to property lines shown on maps to reflect
recent ownership changes to Martin Marietta's property
. Addition of proposed contours on Mine Plan and Reclamation Plan
Maps
. Walking path and landscape buffer yard indicated on maps
. Addition of several notes to the maps consistent with comments
received previously for the other applications
. Changes to the landscaping plan consistent with comments
received previously for the other applications
. Addition of an entire Construction Plan document, inclusive of an
erosion and sediment control plan
. Addition of a Sound level Assessment
The following language will be added to the Additional Information Package to
clarify its purpose and effect:
This Additional Information Package is intended to supplement and in
some cases clarify information previously submitted by Martin Marietta in its
application and should be read in conjunction with such previously submitted
materials. The intent of this Additional Information Package is not to supersede
the original application, the provisions of which shall continue to control and be a
part of this application except where inconsistent with any supplemental
information herein. In the event of any inconsistency, the provisions of the
Additional Information Package shall be controlling. The language addition insert
is attached for inclusion in the Additional Information Package.
Comment 4: The Additional Information submittal explains that the existing surface
limestone operation will be extended to the north to encompass Mueller Property South.
Maps and plans throughout the Additional Information submittal do not show the
connection between the two operations. The Mine Plan and Reclamation Plan maps
show that Mueller Property South will be mined with no connection to the existing
operation. The Reclamation Plan shows that Mueller Property South will be reclaimed
as a lake while the existing limestone operation remains dry. All plans, cross-sections
and plates should indicate that that existing operation will be extended to the north to
incorporate Mueller Property South.
.Response to Comment 4:
The Mine Plan Map, Reclamation Plan Map, and Cross-Sections have been
modified to identify a "transition zone" between the existing North Indianapolis
Plant Operation and the proposed Mueller Property South Surface Limestone
Operation. These revised plans are enclosed. The existing North Indianapolis
Operation will advance northward with the active mining face and eventually
extend to the proposed mining bench locations identified on the Mueller Property
South Mine Plan Map.
Comment 5: The method of mining, particularly blasting and advancement of surface
limestone benches on the Mueller South property is not described in the Additional
Information submittal. Given the concerns of the community over the potential impacts
of surface mine blasting on structures and property, it is critical that Martin Marietta
describe how the existing surface limestone operation will be expanded into Mueller
South, while at the same time protecting the integrity of adjacent properties. As the
submittal currently stands there is no discussion of this topic.
Similarly, the original application materials, dated 2002, merely state that blasting will
occur on the site. Neither document describes how blasting will be conducted in a
manner protective of the adjacent properties. Spectra cannot recommend a favorable
decision on the application until a blasting plan is described in far greater detail.
Response to Comment 5:
Martin Marietta retained Doug Rudenko, a nationally recognized expert on
blasting who works for Vibra-Tech, to review its blasting practices and
procedures and to conduct a study of projected vibration levels at the nearest
residences. Mr. Rudenko's study shows that even at the closest point at which
blasting might be allowed under this application, Martin Marietta would meet the
State of Indiana blasting limits, criteria recommended by the Bureau of Mines and
commonly referred to as the Siskind Curve or the Z Curve, and criteria previously
recommended to the City by Spectra at the nearest residential structure. These
vibration levels would also be less than the levels found to cause even cosmetic
damage in various studies, including Effects of Repeated Blasting on a Wood-
Frame House, RI 8896, and Structure Response and Damage Produced by Ground
Vibration From Surface Mine Blasting, RI 8507. Further, vibration from Martin
Marietta's proposed blasting would meet these limits with a substantial margin of
safety. Martin Marietta will propose a blasting limit that meets these criteria as a
part of its commitments. Additionally, Martin Marietta will propose an extensive
monitoring and reporting system for ground vibration and air blast, together with
the right by the Director to ask for additional monitoring locations. Martin
Marietta will also commit to limits on the times and days when blasting will be
allowed.
Comment 6: The Erosibnand Sediment Control Report, dated September 2005, is in-
part entitled "Surface Limestone Operation." Section 6.1 of the report, however, where
sedimentation controls are described, discusses primarily sedimentation controls in the
sand and gravel operation and not the limestone operation. In fact, Section 6.1 of the
Surface limestone Operation Report is almost word-for-word identical to Section 6.1 of
the June 2005, Sediment and Erosion Control Report submitted in support of the
Mueller South Sand and Gravel application. The applicability of the September 2005
Erosion and Sediment Control Report to the limestone operation is not clear. The report
discusses almost exclusively various sand and gravel operating scenarios with little or
no mention of the development of a limestone operation on the Mueller South property.
Since the approved sand and gravel operation is already supported by an Erosion and
Sediment Control Report, the most recent Erosion and Sediment Control Report should
be tailored specifically to the limestone operation.
Response to Comment 6:
The Erosion and Sediment Control Plan for the Mueller Property South Surface
Limestone Operation is intended to be very similar to that approved for Mueller
Property South Sand and Gravel Operation. Since the activities are occurring on
the same parcel and the sand and gravel deposit overlays the limestone, the sand
and gravel must be removed prior to limestone mining occurring; therefore, the
erosion and sediment control measures are applicable to both operations.
Furthermore, the limestone extraction is commencing south of Blue Woods Creek
and at the transition zone between the existing North Indianapolis Operation and
Mueller Property South. Any storm water runoff and groundwater discharge will
drain into the existing limestone operation.
Comment 7: The September 2005 Sediment and Erosion Control Plan included with
the Additional Information submittal describes a mining scenario, prior to the relocation
of Blue Woods Creeks, where storm water and groundwater drainage into the existing
limestone operation is not yet possible (due to the presence of Blue Woods Creek). As
a result, a series of sediment basins and sumps will be constructed as sediment control
devices. According to information presented at the TAC meeting, these control
structures have already been constructed on the site. From the proposed grades of
these sediment basins (as shown in the Erosion Control Plan Report), sand and gravel
excavation in the northwestern portion of the Mueller South property will occur at
elevations below the inverts of the sediment basins. Developing the site in this manner
may create a situation where storm water collects in low areas of the excavation, which
then will have to be pumped into the sediment basins. While this operating scenario
may be manageable for precipitation events, the operating scenario becomes
unmanageable once the excavation is lowered to the water and below. Once the water
table is encountered, there will either be continuous pumping of groundwater into the
sedimentation basins to maintain dry excavation conditions, or material will have to be
excavated from below the water table. Operating the sand and gravel operation in this
manner is not permitted under the current approval. The Mueller South sand and gravel
"
operation has been approved as a "Dry" sand and gravel operation, where storm water
runoff and groundwater discharge is to drain into the existing limestone operation. To
ensure that the Mueller South sand and gravel operation is conducted in accordance
with the current approval for the excavation activity, Martin Marietta must commit to
maintaining a five (5) foot separation from the water table (Le. five (5) feet above the
water table) in all excavation areas prior to the relocation of Blue Woods Creek.
Response to Comment 1:
Currently, Martin Marietta has not excavated below the water table, however, the
Mueller Property South Sand and Gravel approval does not prevent Martin
Marietta from mining below the water table. Furthermore, Martin Marietta
recognizes the NPDES requirements for point source discharge from the
excavated sand and gravel pit and will adhere to the existing Rule 12 Permit
(Permit No. ING490012) if the active sand and gravel pit would require the
addition of a discharge point. Specific to the pending application, since the
limestone extraction is commencing south of Blue Woods Creek and at the
transition zone between the existing North Indianapolis Operation and Mueller
Property South, any storm water runoff and groundwater discharge will drain into
the existing limestone operation.
Comment 8: Since the sediment basins described above have been constructed (per
information supplied at the T AC meeting), there is now the potential for storm water
discharge to Blue Woods Creek. What is the status of the NPDES permit authorizing
such discharge? Will copies of the permit application be forwarded to the City as part of
the Board of Zoning Appeals review process?
Response to Comment 8:
The constructed sediment basins as described in Drawing No.2, Job No.
1605456, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan Before Stream Relocation,
dated September 6, 2005 found in the "Mueller Property South, Surface
Limestone Operation, Erosion and Sediment Control Report" are designed for a
10-year, 24-hour rainfall event (see Appendix B of the "Erosion and Sediment
Contro'" document). The structure design and placement were reviewed and
approved as part of the Mueller Property South Sand and Gravel Operation
Construction IStormwater Pollution Prevention Plan by Hamilton County Soil and
Water Conservation District as well as the pending application. Furthermore, A
copy of the Hamilton County Technical Review and Comment (Form 1) and the
Indiana Department of Environmental Management - Notice of Sufficiency dated
March 3, 2005 for project permit #INR102163 Mueller South Sand and Gravel
Operation is attached. As the sediment basins currently exist, there is no point
source discharge of storm water into Blue Woods Creek and any discharge would
be sheet flow crossing the vegetated buffer strip, which is relatively flat terrain.
There are no permit requirements for sheet flow discharge. Point source
discharge would not occur unless some types of conveyances, such as pipes,
.
.
.. ..
were added to the discharges from the basins leading to the creek. Point source
discharge of storm water only would require a Rule 6 permit. Point source
discharge of water from the .active pit would require the addition of a discharge
point to the existing Rule 12 permit (Permit No. ING490012). Martin Marietta
recognizes the NPDES requirements for point source discharge and will adhere to
the existing Rule 12 Permit (Permit No. ING490012) if the active sand and gravel
pit would require the addition of a discharge point. As with all previous Mueller
Applications, prior to commencement of work Martin Marietta has provided
copies of approvals and permits from governmental agencies having jurisdiction
over the Real Estate and/or activities of Martin Marietta with respect to the Real
Estate to DOCS.
Comment 9: The issue of hydrogeology and the potential to adversely impact the Plant
Four Well Field due to the development of the Mueller South limestone operation is not
discussed at any length in either the 2002 or 2005 submittals. The Plant Four Well Field
is in close proximity to the proposed limestone mine Oust north of 10sth Street west of
the Mueller North property). Similarly, the Mueller North sand and gravel operation is a
water-based extraction process also due north of 10sth Street. Will the development of a
surface limestone operation south of 106-" Street compromise water levels in the
Mueller North sand and gravel operation and the Plant Four Well Field (both during
active excavation and after reclamation of Mueller North)? Similarly, what are the
implications of the proposed reclamation lake for the existing surface mine operation
extending north adjacent to 10sth Street? Spectra cannot recommend a favorable
decision on the application until a full discussion of hydrogeologic issues is provided.
Spectra is concerned about issues of hydrogeology based on the viability of the
proposed operation and reclamation plans.
Response to Comment 9:
Through the course of two previous applications, Martin Marietta has worked
directly with the City Utilities Department and its consultant in the development of
a ground water monitoring model and a comprehensive ground water flow and
water quality-monitoring program for the Plant 4 Well Field.
To date, Martin Marietta has submitted and incorporated within the Mueller
Property South and North Sand and Gravel Operation Commitments the
following:
. Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Plan for the Mueller Property
South Sand and Gravel Operation dated June 2004. This Plan has been
implemented. .
. Groundwater and Surface Water Monitoring Plan for the Mueller Property
North Sand and Gravel Operation dated May 2005. This Plan has been
initiated with the completion of monitoring well installation and initial
testing underway.
7
.
.
. ..,
These monitoring plans are an integral part of the necessary infrastructure for the
monitoring and characterization of the aquifer. Martin Marietta has contacted the
City Utilities Department and inquired as to whether any additional information is
required and anticipates that the Department will advise Martin Marietta or the
Department of Community Services if additional information is needed.
Additionally, Martin Marietta recognizes that the City may want to conduct
additional monitoring at its own expense and agrees to cooperate with the City to
permit such additional monitoring. Furthermore, Martin Marietta shall grant the
City access to the monitoring points, flow meters, and related areas at all
reasonable times, subject to compliance with MSHA regulations. The City shall
also have access to monitoring locations on an as needed basis for emergency
purposes.
o ceo
~"..>,'.XQfiI:
uel1~r;.So~ ...... ........ ...an
.......~i~~~rlft~~[t~$h':~1~~II~~~.~w~t;I~!f.li~~!~il~~M@~~em~IJ~*~~91]...
the: aboy~-;ipentionedprojec:iissuffiCientto cori1plywllliJhe NOIletterrequireIIlentSof 327cIACJ 5-~(Rtlie;5py ou
-, n.t-i_.>_".'.. _ i,-, _ ,-,<"::",'!";:-;':;::::<";H':"""",,,,--:_,<:"' '_ - :":' - ,/" :-;-:~'/:"-:-'-'-':::""i> :,~~-<:~-',::'~';i~.,:<".:;_ .~.: -'_ '.- ."- ".:. ..;;.; ,:--~:'-:"', ,"",'- :. -",-.: >---:':,~",""''':', . ""'-'"::--"::;-:" "_. ',~' :,-,-' <._'_; .~:-;; <: ,.>:/~,,,;;::_:t__'__,.,:~_~:_~:. -, :,..... ,'. .:,:.: ".' ;,-' '.: ' _:/!-;:-'\~"':';'::_.'. u ;;';:,'''..:'_>. ::.
. m~st.c()IIlPly~tth.~Il..o!~~eteclllir~i11.ellts. 0(327. ~<::...1S-? (R.ule,5)....In accor~~I1~e~~,th..~.t7M g;~~:~7!,9,yo~
arerequiredto'iIYpl~lDe~.t yourCoDstructionPlall'. mailltailltbe ,..~rosiOnCOIl~I:91 stI"H5i~r~s;~#ti( y~qrilroj eCt
iscomplete,~~~,anlen<l you~Noras,d~tes o}". other facts change. All Noti~esf>,flptellts~b.nl~t~~~.l~r~1lIe5
NPDES General Permit coverage are automatically limited to a maximum term length 'of 5 years,~AWwith
40 Code of Federal Regulations' 122.46(a), (regardless of the estimated end datejjrovidedoD the Notice of
Intent form/letter). All projects requiring coverage beyond the5years must reaprJIyfor~newpe;nii"f90 days
prior the expiration date. .
;;~.', ":;:
This project permit # is INRI 02163 and provided project name is Mueller South Sand and Gravel Operation and is
located in Hamilton County. This information is required for all correspondence that is submitted to IDEM pertaining
to this project.
.'
NOTE: This Notice of Sufficiency does not constitute approval of your Erosion/Sediment Control Plan
(E/SCP), nor does it supersede the requirements ofyollr local Soil & Water Conservation District Office
(SWCD) or the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Soil Conservation (DNR). Questions
regarding the development or implementation of the E/SCP may be directed to the local county SWCD or if
YOll are unable to reach tlte SWCD, please contact DNR at 317/233-3870. Any other questions regarding
Rule 5 requirements may be directed to the IDEM Rule 5 Coordinator at 317/233-1864 or 800/451-6027
e.'Ct.31864. For bifo andforms visit:
htto:/ /www.in.gov/idem/\vater/nodes/pennits/wetwthr/ storm/rul e5. h tml
Sincerely,
('\
Vv., .'
,1<
C '--
/~
\.}..J',_,'"
Jay A. Davis, Rule 5 Coordinator
Construction Storm Water Permitting
Urban Wet Weather Section
Office of Water Quality
\\".,
"
/
/
C c :Da,,,, !-IOSK;.fv; (
Y. I.~... .
1-.
.. ",
Construction/Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan
Technical Review and Comment (Form 1)
Project Name: Mueller South Sand and Gravel Operation County: Hamilton
Plan Submittal Date: 07/07/04 Hydrologic Unit Code: 5120201090040
Project Location Description: SW comer of 106th and Hazel Dell Roads
Latitude and Longitude:Lat. 39- 56'- 19" N Long. 86'- 04'- 54" W
= Civil Township: Clay Quarter: Nl/2 Section: 9 Township: 17N Range: 4E
= . < "
....
.... Project Owner Name: Martin Marietta Materials Inc.
~
E! Contact: Dan Hoskins .
'"
cS Address: 1980 E. 116th Street, suite 200
=
~
.... City: Carmel State: IN Zip: 46032
u
~ Phone: 317-573-4460 FAX: 317-573-5975 E..;MaiJ:
.....
e ~
~ Plan Preparer Name: Laura D. Berra P.E.
Affiliation: Skelly and Loy Consultants
Address: 2601 North Front Street <,
City: Harrisburg State: P A Zip: 17110-1185
Phone: 717-232-0593 FAX: 717-232-1799 E-Mail: skellyloy@skeUyloy.com
Review Date: 07/22/04 r1 (,
~ Principal Plan Reviewer: John B. South P.E. CPESC y.,.t:
.~ Agency: Hamilton County Soil and Water Conservation District
~
~ Address: 1108 South 9th Street
= City: Noblesville
~ Phone: 317-773-2181
Assisted By:
FAX:
State: IN
317-776-1101
Zip: 46060
E-Mail: john-south@iaswcd.org
~ PLAN IS ADEQUATE: A comprehensive plan review has been completed and it has been determined that the
plan satisfies the minimum requirements and intent of 327 lAC 15-5.
o Please refer to additional information included on the following page(s).
o Submit Notice of Intent (N01): Attach a copy of this cover page when submitting the NOI to the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management. Construction activities may begin 48 hours following the submittal of
the NO!. A copy of the NOI must also be sent to the ReviewinJ{ Authority (e.g. SWCD, DNR).
o A preliminary plan review has been completed; a comprehensive review will not be completed within the 28-day
review period. The reviewing authority reserves the right to perform a comprehensive review at a later date and
revisions to the plan may be required at that time to address deficiencies.
o Please refer to additional information included on the following page(s).
o Submit Notice of Intent (N01): Attach a copy of this cover page when submitting the NOI to the Indiana
Department of Environmental Management. Construction activities may begin 48 hours following the submittal of
the NO!. A copy of the NOI must also be sent to the Reviewing Authority (e.J!. SWCD, DNR). .
o PLAN IS DEFICIENT: Significant deficiencies were identified during the plan review.
o Please refer to additional information included on the following page(s).
o DO NOT fIle a Notice of Intent for this project.
o DO NOT commence land disturbing activities until all deficiencies are adequately addressed, the plan re-
submitted, and notification has been received that the minimum requirements have been satisfied.
o Plail Revisions 0 Deficient Items should be mailed or delivered to the Principal Plan Reviewer identified
in the Plan Review Section above.
DNR, Division of Soil Conservation
Page 1 of 4
Revised 12/09/03, Form 1
.F \i;~
'1
, "
.< .
ConstructionlStormwater Pollution Prevention Plan - Technical Review and Comment (Form 1)
Project Name: Mueller South Sand and Gravel Operation
Date Reviewed: 07/22/04
The technical review and comments are intended to evaluate the completeness of the Construction/Stormwater Pollution
Prevention Plan for the project, ,The Plan submitted was not reviewed for the adequacy of the engineering design. All
measures included in the plan, as well as those recommended in the comments should be evaluated as to their feasibility
by a qualified individual with structural measures designed by a qualified engineer. The Plan has not been reviewed
for other local, state, or federal permits that may be required to proceed with this project. Additional information,
including design calculations may be requested to furt..her evaluate the Plan.
All proposed stormwater pollution prevention measures and those referenced in this review must meet the design criteria
and standards setforth in the "Indiana Storm water Quality Manual"from the Indiana Department of Natural
Resources. Division of Soil Conservation or similar Guidance Documents.
Please direct questions and/or comments regarding this plan review to:
John B. South P,E. CPESC
Please refer to the address and contact information identified in the Plan Review Section on page 1.
Assessment of Construction Plan Elements (Section A)
The Construction Plan Elements are adequately represented to complete a plan review:
o Yes 0 No
The items checked below are deficient and require submittal to meet the requirements of the rule.
Index showing locations of required Plan Elements
2 11 by 17 inch plat showing building lot
numberslboundaries and road layout/names
o 4 Vicinity map showing project location
o 3
Narrative describing the nature and purpose of the
project
Legal Description of the Project Site
(Include Latitude and Longitude - NOI Requirement)
o 15 Adjacent Ianduse, including upstream watershed
o 6 Location of all lots and proposed site
improvements (roads, utilities, structures, etc,)
o 8 Notation of any State or Federal water quality
permits
O Specific points where stormwater discharge will leave 0 Location and name of all wetlands, lakes and
9 th . 10 d d' th.
e SIte water courses on an a gacent to e SIte
o Identification of potential discharges to ground
12 water (abandoned wells, sinkholes, etc.)
o i3 100 year floodplains, floodways, and floodway fringes 0 14 Pre-constr.Iction and post construction estimate 0
Peak Discharge (10 Year stonn event)
o 16 Locations and approximate boundaries of all
disturbed areas (Construction Limits)
O Soils map including soil descriptions and
18 I' 't 0'
Iml a ons
Plans for any off-site construction activities
20 'at d 'th th' , ( " ")
asSOCI e WI IS project sewer, water tie-ms
o 2 Existing site topography at an interval appropriate
2 to indicate drainage patterns
7 Hydrologic unit code (14 Digit)
o 5
o 11 Identification of all receiving waters
o 17 Identification of existing vegetative cover
o Locations, size and dimensions of proposed stormwater 0
19 systems (e.g, pipes, swales and channels)
o Locations of proposed soil stockpiles and/or
21 borrow/disposal areas
Proposed fmal topography at an interval appropriate to
23 ' d' dra'
m Icate mage patterns .
DNR, Division of Soil Conservation
Page 2 of 4
Revised 12/09/03, Form 1
, ,
>,
,.,.
, ,.
Construction/Stormwater Pollution'Prevention Plan - Technical Review and Comment (Form 1)
Project Name: Mueller South Sand and Gravel Operation
Date Reviewed: 07/22/04
Assessment of Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (Sections B & C)
~ -
~ =
= .~
l:l" U
~ '-=
"C ~
<~
00
00
The construction component of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan includes stormwater quality
measures to address erosion, sedimentation, and other pollutants associated with land disturbance and
construction activities. Proper implem'lntation of the plan and inspections of the construction site are
necessary to minimize the discharge of pollutants. The Project Site Owner should be aware that
unforeseen construction activities and weather conditions may affect the performance of a practice or the
effectiveness of the plan. The plan must be a flexible document, with provisions to modify or substitute
Q B .
Z ractlces as necessary.
Description of potential pollutant sources associated with construction activities
Sequence describing storm water quality measure implementation relative to land disturbing
activities
Stable construction entrance locations and specifications (at all points of ingress and egress)
Sediment control measures for sheet flow areas
Sediment control measures for concentrated flow areas
Storm sewer inlet protection measure locations and specifications
Runoff control measures (e.g. diversions, rock check dams, slope drains, etc.)
Storm water outlet protection specifications
Grade stabilization structure locations and specifications
10 Location, dimensions, specifications, and construction details of each stormwater quality measure
11 Temporary surface stabilization methods appropriate for each season (include sequencing)
12 Permanent surface stabilization specifications (include sequencing)
13 Material handling and spill prevention plan
14 Monitoring and maintenance guidelines for each proposed stormwater quality measure
15 Erosion & sediment control specifications for individual building lots
The post construction component of the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan includes the
implementation of storm water quality measures to address pollutants that will be associated with the
nallanduse. Post construction stormwater quality measures should be functional upon completion of
the project. Long term functionality of the measures are critical to their performance and should be
C monitored and maintained. .
Description of pollutants and their sources associated with the proposed land use
Sequence describing storm water quality measure implementation
Description of proposed post construction stormwater quality measures
(Include a written description of how these measures will reduce discharge of expected pollutants)
Location, dimensions, specifications, and construction details of each storm water quality measure
Description of maintenance guidelines for post construction storm water quality measures
DNR, Division of Soil Conservation
Page 3 of 4
Revised 12/09/03. Form 1
'r
".... - '",.:.. ...
.
.'
Construction/Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan - Technical Review and Comment
!project Name: Mueller South Sand and Gravel Operation
lDate Reviewed: 07/22/04.
cc: Carmel, Surveyor, File
DNR, Division of Soil Conservation
Page 4 of 4
Revised 12/09/03
40 CFR 112.5(a) and (c) requires the SPCC Plan to be amended whenever there is a change in facility
design, construction, operation, or maintenance, which materially affects its potential to discharge to
navigable waters of the United States or adjoining shorelines. Such amendments to the Plan shall be
made within six (6) months of the change, with technical amendments certified by a Professional
Engineer (PE). Administrative updates such as name or phone number changes do not require PE
certification.
5
Plan u date. D. Max Williams
Plan u date. D. Max Williams
Plan update in accordance with James R.
newly adopted requirements of Luckiewicz
8/16/02.
03/11/04 Administrative and map D. Max Willia
revisions
03/22/05 Update of contact names, and James
addition of drum #26 near Luckiewicz
P . Crusher
11/04/05 Apri115, 2005 aerial photo base James
inserted into Site Plan, "Mueller Luckiewicz
Property South" added to Site
Plan and legend; property line
updated along northwest
boundary; High voltage line
s bol added to Ie end
Indiana
16245
4
Indiana 890260
6
Indiana 890260
The owner or operator must complete a review and evaluation of the SPCC plant at least once every five
(5) years. The Plan must be amended within six (6) months of the review to include more effective
control and prevention technology, if such technology has been field-proven at the time of the review and
will significantly reduce the likelihood of a discharge.
Signature Date Plan Amended (Y IN)
This Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan is fully supported by the management of
Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. This Plan will be amended in the event of a change in facility design,
construction, operation, or maintenance that could affect its potential to discharge oil into the waters of the
. United States.
:J3/{) {
-
Date
ger, Indiana District
North Indianapolis SPCC
April 1,2003
Page 5