HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
u
o
FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT CONSIDERATION
Carmel Plan Commission
Carmel, Indiana
DOCKET NO. 67-02 DP AMEND NAl\1E OF PROJECT: Fifth Third Bank
PETITIONER:
Fifth Third Bank
_ Based upon all the evidence presented by the Petitioner and upon the Department
Report of the Department of Community Services, dated August 20, 2002 , we
determine that the Development Plan complies with the standards setforth in Ch. 24
Planned District Regulations, of the Carmel/Clay Zoning Ordinance.
~ We hereby aporove of the Development Plan Amendment as submitted with the
following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner.
Condition 1. Conditions stated in Department Report dated August 20, 2002.
Condition 2.
_ We hereby disaporove of the Development Plan Amendment as submitted for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
DATED TIllS 20th DAY OF August
2002
~~~
Z:/SHARFlFOR.1v!/DEVPLAN AMENDIFINDF ACT
u
Q
FlNDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR
DEVELOPMENT PLAN AMENDMENT CONSIDERATION
.6 ~ ~ Carmel Plan Co~ission
n.- Carmel, IndIana
"J iI . &1... 0 ~1. ~.. ~ ~~;;:" ::r
DOCKET NO. DP AMEND NA1v1E OF PROJECT: . '=
g ..... .~ n...." ......~'::;... ~ ~ .. L ?'
PEmIONER:- : 1 - ~C;;""A b \A. ~.J 8A.JK..
Based upon all the evidence p~~~nted by the Petitioner and upon the Department
- Report of the Department of Community Services, dated 1l~1u5---r "2-0,' zz;Cfwe
determine that the Development Plan complies with the standards setforth in Ch. 24
Planned District Regulations, of the CarmeVClay Zoning Ordinance.
/\/ We hereby approve of the Development Plan Amendment as submitted with the
~ following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner.
Condition 1. CO....~,-"(\oQ'" 5.
. .i/y'tI(;;. ~ 1\f
~ ,~ ~IR'T_ ~~
Condition 2.
_ We hereby disaoprove of the Development Plan Amendment as submitted for the
following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
~
DATED TIllS ~DAY OF,4u/, i..! ~,r
j:OD2,.
2001.
Commission Member
Z:JSHARB'FORM/DEVPLANAMEND/FINDF ACT
i I
I
r U
i
, U
I : B~k?..
I I 5/3
i B~
... -.1
i
,
-" ,
I II ~~
.
I . ~'
I -; )\- CP' -
, I ..--.""
i I_~~ )
I I '- --
,J
, ,
,
/::I?\'
~, 1'- N~
,1 ~~ B~I~
"
i
I
r- ;i
-
!i
'.
: -II
,
i
I- i
- -
,-
I i \
,---.- -
- -------
--
I. --"- ---~-
- -
--
I
I -.
--
, --..-.-----------
: --
,
'-
-
I ----.--------'--- -->----
--
--
i
I - I
I
-
-. >------ ~
--_.-
-
, -
--
Q
Q
CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT REPORT
August 20, 2002
6i. Docket No. 67-02 DP Amend/ADLS; West Carmel Center, Block D, Lot 2-
Fifth Third Bank
The applicant seeks amended development plan and ADLS approval to construct a
financial institution. The site is located at the northeast comer of US 421 and Retail
Parkway. The site is zoned B-3/Business and is subject to the requirements of the US
421/Michigan Road Overlay Zone.
Filed by Jeffery Hartley of Klump & Associates
The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Plan Amendment and ADLS for the
construction of a bank at the northeast comer of Retail Parkway and US 421. Please see the
informational packet prepared by the applicant at the time of the June Public Hearing for an
overview of the site and proposed building elevations.
The Special Studies forwards this item to the full Plan Commission with a favorable
recommendation by a vote of 4-0 with the conditions listed below.
The Department recommends approval of the petition, as amended, subject to the following
conditions:
1. That the connection to site to the north shall be constructed on this site to the
property line.
2. That the brick design of the ATM match the elevation of the building.
Direction was provided to reduce the mass and height of the roof over the drive-thru
area.
3. That the east elevation reflect a gable over the rear of the building similar to the
west elevation at the same pitch as gable over drive thru.
4. That all light fixtures provide a flat lens design.
Note: As a DP Amend, written findings are required for action on that item. The applicant
should provide this at the meeting.
Additional Note: A sign for the Target exists on the parcel today. With subdivision of the parcel
the ground sign is no longer located on Target site. Off-premise signs require a variance from the
Board of Zoning Appeals. The Target sign as it exists today is a violation and it shall either be
removed or acquire variance approval to remain. A building permit shall not be issued until this
issue is resolved.