Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 07-02-02 CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION SPECIAL STUDIES COMMITTEE DEPARTMENT REPORT July 2, 2002 8. Docket No. 66-02 DP AmendJADLS; Hamilton Crossing Building #S (Revised) The applicant seeks amended development plan and ADLS approval to construct an office building. The site is generally located at the southwest comer of 131 st Street and U.S. Highway 31. Filed by Blair D. Carmosino of Duke Realty Corporation. The applicant is requesting approval of a Development Plan and ADLS for the construction of an office building. The site is generally located at the southwest comer of 131 st Street and U.S. Highway 31. Please see the informational packet prepared by the applicant for an overview of the site and proposed building. The Department in its review has asked the applicant to address / provide the following: The following items are those that require additional attention/discussion: 1. Approval of the DP will recognize that the identified setbacks conform to the Thoroughfare Plan, specifically, Resolution No. 08-07-003 addressing the intersection of 131 st Street and US Highway 31. The applicant will not be dedicating the area bound by the north property line, existing US 31 right-of-way and the "proposed ramp right-of-way property line". However, approval ofthis DP will ensure that there will be no improvements placed within the area that may frustrate future acquisition by the State of Indiana for the purpose of constructing an interchange. The State has not adopted a final plan for the construction of improvements at this intersection. However, the existing Thoroughfare Plan ensures that a reasonable configuration is protected for the layout of an interchange. The applicant may return in the future to request a modification to the proposed DP that would include improvements within this area. The Plan Commission would only have the ability to approve such plan if the Thoroughfare Plan is amended. 2. Landscaping: A revised plan is being prepared to address all Department concerns. It will be available by the committee meeting date. 3. Signage: No signage is being proposed at this time. A future ADLS amendment will need to be submitted to address signage if none is submitted with this application. 4. Lighting: Is the proposed lighting consistent with the other sites within Hamilton Crossing? The Department is in support of this request subject to adequate resolution ofthe above items. The Department recommends that this item be forwarded to the full Plan Commission with a favorable recommendation after all comments and concerns have been addressed. Committee Report 2002-7-2