HomeMy WebLinkAboutDept Report 07-17-07
CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT REPORT
July 17, 2007
11. Docket No. 07040022 PP: Justus Business Park, lots 1-2
The applicant seeks primary plat approval for 2 lots on 7.298 acres. The site is
located at the southeast corner of 136th St. and Pro Med Ln. and is zoned B-
6/Business within the US 31 Overlay.
Filed by Paul Reis of Bose McKinney & Evans for Justus Home Builders.
The petitioner seeks Plan Commission approval to divide a parcel into 2 lots. Lot 1 will be 2.651 acres,
and Lot 2 will be 4.647 acres, to total 7.298 acres. Approval of this commercial subdivision will give
Justus the option of selling the land not used for their proposed office development to another party for
development. The site is bordered by Pro Med Lane and Smokey Row Road. Kensington Place is to the
east of the site. Please see the petitioner's informational packet for more detail.
At the June 28 Special Studies Committee meeting, the following issues/concerns/requests were made:
1. None, the plat was looked at favorably.
The following are outstanding issues/concerns from DOCS:
1.) The Engineering Oep't has no issues with the approval of this primary plat. The petitioner
will continue working with the Engineering Dept on final constmction plans with the
Secondary Plat.
2.) The City Forester, Scott Brewer, has tentatively approved the landscape plan.
The Department of Community Services recommends the Plan Commission approve this
item after all questions/concerns are addressed.
CARMEL PLAN COMMISSION
DEPARTMENT REPORT
July 17, 2007
21. Docket No. 07040023 DP Amend/ ADLS Amend: Justus Business Park, lot 2 -
Justus Office Building
The applicant seeks site plan & design approval for an office building. The site is located
southeast of l36th 81. and Pro Med Ln. and is zoned B-6/Business within the US 31 Overlay.
Filed by Paul Reis of Bose McKinney & Evans for Justus Home Builders.
The petitioner seeks site plan and design approval for an oftlce building. This proposed office building is
very similar to the office building presented with the Jackson Square PUD (Planned Unit Development)
rezone (Docket No.s 05020038 Z and 05020039 DP/ ADLS), which was approved by the Plan
Commission in 2005, but was ultimately denied by City Council in July 2005. Now, the only major
difference is that town homes are no longer proposed, the office building location has shifted east, closer
to Kensington Place, and the building architecture has been modified slightly. The office building design
is the same, but tbe building has increased about 10,000 square feet, and a walkout basement level has
been added. The site is currently zoned B-6 Business, which pennits office land uses. No rezone is
required for this office building proposal. Per commitments recorded with the land when the original B-6
rezone was approved, a 50-ft tree preservation area will be maintained along the east property line. Also,
bio retention areas and some permeable pavement will be utilized to make the site more environmentally
friendly. Please see the petitioner's original infonnational packet for more detail on the site plan and
building elevations.
Currently, no variance requests will be sought from the Board of Zoning Appeals.
At the June 19 Plan Commission meeting, the following issues/concerns/requests were made:
I.) Two 'green' parking spaces for hybrid cars were requested from one PC member, but not requested
by another. Providing two 'green' parking spaces is NOT required by the ordinance. It is only a
request and an opportunity to go above and beyond what the ordinance requires.
2.) There was a request for the path that connects the north side of the building to the 1 O-it pedestrian
path along Smokey Row be constructed in a way to take down or interfere with as little trees as
possible. The petitioner was instructed to contact David Littlejohn, Transportation Systems
Coordinator, for some options.
3.) A request was made in regard to the sidewalk at the southwest corner of the site, to either make
better use of that walkway or possibly stub out to the street to provide some sort of connectivity.
4.) A request was made to provide a white roof and sky lights to provide some 'green' building design.
At the June 28 Special Studies Committee meeting, the following issues/concerns/requests were made:
1. The project was looked at favorably by the committee.
2. The ten-foot wide asphalt path should stay.
3. It was strongly recommended that the white roofbe installed.
The following are outstanding issues/concerns from DOCS:
1.) The Engineering Dep't has no major issues with the approval of this project. A traffic study will not
be required for this project The petitioner will continue working with the Engineering Dept on final
construction plans with the Secondary Plat.
2.) The City Forester, Scott Brewer, has tentatively approved the landscape plan.
The Department of Community Services recommends the Plan Commission approve this
item after an questions/concerns are addressed.