The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence11/22/21 11/22/21 Page 1of1 Conn, Angelina V From: Mike Dauss [mikedauss @daussarchitects.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2007 10:01 AM ��ubQt To: Conn, Angelina V n AILS • Cc: Gregory Thompson �,`t, 1�'✓ Subject: Fw: Concrete Curb & Gutter- BK Carmel Attachments: Curb & Gutter Detail.pdf Angie, The contractor has requested changing the curb on this project from straight curb as approved by the City of Carmel to using a "chair back"curb and gutter(see attached drawing). Please forward to the City Engineer for his review and comment. r C Thanks for your assistance. C C) Mike Dauss Original Message From: Jamie Gardner To: 'Mike Dauss' Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 3:49 PM Subject: FW: Concrete Curb & Gutter- BK Carmel From: Jamie Gardner [mailto:jamie @jrfconstruction.com] Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 1:39 PM To: 'Mike Dauss' Subject: Concrete Curb &Gutter - BK Carmel Attached is the cut of the concrete curb and gutter we would like to utilize to save on the schedule. Our concrete contractor stated he just put 6,000 I.f. in at the Marriott in Carmel so it should not be a big deal to get it approved by the City. Jamie A. Gardner CONSTRUCTION Manager of Estimating and Contracts 1031 East 169th Street Westfield, Indiana 46074 (317)896-1100 Phone (317)896-1102 Facsimile www.jrfconstruction.com 10/16/2007 .... ~~~= DAUSS ARCHITEGS architecture planning 227 historic w. 11th st. p.o. box 1006 anderson, in 46016 tel: 765.649.2258 fax: 765.649.2337 email: info@ daussarchitects.com July 11, 2007 City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attn. Angie Conn Planning Administrator Ref. Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Angie Please find enclosed 15 Information Packets with the following revised Drawings to be included with the previously submitted packets: Alternate Site Layout - Landscape Plan L-1 Alternate Site Layout - Lighting Plan SE-1 Alternate Site Layout - Photometric Plan LSI Alternate Site Layout - Signage Plan SS-1 Revised Building Elevations A-2 Revised Menu Board Elevation Order Confirmation Canopy Elevation Dated: 07/03/07 Dated: 07/03/07 Dated: 07/08/07 Dated: 07/03/07 Dated: 07103/07 Dated: 07103/07 Dated: 07/03/07 The following items are in response to comments received at the June 19, 2007 Plan Commission meeting and further discussed at the June 28, 2007Special Studies Committee: Item No.1 Item No.2 One "green" parking space to be included in the site layout. Special Studies Committee recommended the alternate site plan presented be approved contingent on Board of Zoning Approval for the variance to allow the Drive-Thru Lane to be located in the side yard. 15 copies of the alternate Site Layout and Landscape Plan aTe attached to be included with the previously submitted Information Packets. Please note this plan has been submitted to staff for review and also directly copied to Scott Brewer for landscape review. Special Studies Committee requested the cross access be maintained especially considering the flow allowed by the alternate Parking layout presented. The flush exterior doors are to be painted terra cotta to match the brick. (The color difference on the drawings is due to the printing program.) Samples of the actual materials were submitted for the awnings and it is our understanding the Special Studies Committee found both the material and the color to be acceptable. Item No.3 Item No.4 .... -~. ~-~~ '. Page 2 Item No.5 We will comply with the request to make the trash enclosures taller than the trash receptacle. Please note the walls surrounding the trash enclosure are currently design to be 8 feet in height. Special Studies Committee requested a masonry base to match the building be added to the menu board. Please note with the alternate site layout the menu board will be hidden by the masonry walls of the dumpster enclosure. We have also included plant materials that will screen the dumpster enclosure and the sign. The sign is not as visible from the road with the alternate site layout. Please note the area of the sign is currently before the BZA for variance approval. The light fixtures to be used have been directed by the developer. The proposed fixtures will match the existing parking lot lighting. Burger King Corporation will maintain the sign as required. Special Studies Committee did not rule in favor or against the awning to be included above the order box. This is included for the convenience of the customer during inclement weather. It is our understanding staff is to review this item and advise. See Item No.6 above concerning the base of the menu board. No further comments were received concerning directional signage. It is our understanding this comment is not directed towards the directional slgnage. Item No.6 Item No.7 Item No.8 Item No.9 Item No. 10 Other outstanding issues/concerns from DOCS: Item No.1 We have included a copy of the response from City of Carmel Engineering indicating the project was out of their jurisdiction and they are not going to review this project. Item No.2 With the alternate site layout the access ladder is no longer visible from 421. We have screened the "maintenance and utility area" behind the building with masonry walls. Item NO.3 it was our understanding Scott Brewer had approved our plans. Obviously his review and approval of the alternate site layout will be required. We have already e-mailed plans to him for his review. Please feel free to contact me if YOll should have any further comments or questions. Page 1 of 1 Mike Dauss From: To: Cc: Sent: Attach: Subject: "Mike Oauss" <mikedauss@daussarchitects.com> "Conn, Angelina V" <Aconn@carmel.in.gov> "Brewer, Scott I" <SBrewer@carmel.in.gov> Tuesday, July 03, 2007 3:05 PM L-1 Landscape plan 070307.pdf Burger King . i 'I- rr~ ':' ~ ~.~ <,J' , ,/ .< 'to" ~, , : ., Angie, Attached is a revised landscape plan showing the revised layout and planting. Please note this option actually has about 350 square feet more green space. the tree count and variety remain the same. We are indicating additional shrubs to provide screening of the drive-thru lane Look forward to your comments. Mike Dauss 7/3/2007 .1.1 ~~~= DAUSS ARCHITEGS architecture planning 227 historic W. Illh st p.o. box 1006 anderson. in 46016 tel: 765.649.225S fax: 765.649.2337 email: info@ daussarchitects.com June 20, 2007 City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attn. Angie Conn Planning Administrator Ref. Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Angie The following items are in response to review comments received at the Plan Commission Public Hearing June 19, 2007. Item No.1 - Two of the gentlemen on the commission commented that they did not like the site layout as presented. No specific reasons were indicated, but we are assuming they were commenting to traffic flow. We have two concerns for this comment. First if this is truly a concern why was this not addressed by staff prior to this meeting? We have complied with the ordinance requiring the drive-thru stack and drive-thru windows be located in the rear yard and rear of the building and have provided the required ten stack spaces. If this is truly a concern a much better approach may be to allow the drive-thru window service to be located on the north side of the building oriented towards the access drive to the Home Depot. This would facilitate a better flow around the building and eliminate the conflict we think was inferred by these comments. Would a variance to allow the drive-thru window o'n the north side of the building be considered? Our second concern is related to the variance request we have before the board of zoning to allow a reduction in the number of spaces required. Should we table our variance request until such time as we have a site layout and plan that is approved by the Plan Commission? Please note the Wendy's restaurant located to the north of our development has a similar layout for their entrance from the access drive and for their stacking space. 1.1.1 ~~~= 'y-rv-^ "cf1'" S v.. 'c> ( o--Ii" v,fCl'fl ()'f~ ~-:-~&J-~age 2 co. 'IJ (5.. \\j vi ~ /' Item No.2 - Comment was made regarding the canopy over the Drive-thru order ~~ station. The blue color was questioned and I got the sense they did not like the JJ:c..~ awning itself. - i ~~ '\J ~~; The ordinance does not address this canopy and we reviewed this with staff prior I ~~ 'v'" to the meeting agreeing to use a cloth awning in lieu of metal roofing. Please (j; (Jo'wo... note this canopy also serves as a last warning for low clearance problems to prevent damage to the awnings requested at the cash window and pick-up window. I?(. (tV,,'-- ~ ~ ,elJ..~vJl We would also appreciate clarification on the comments r0cerning color. The overlay ordinance does not address the color of awnings. Please note the tenant shop property developed to the north of the site has blue awnings on the front and side elevations of the building and the Applebee's restaurant has the "Apple logo" on their awnings. Item No.3 - Trash enclosure height required to be taller than refuse boxes. We will comply and will verify with Burger King Corporation the height of the refuse boxes to be used at this site. Item No.4 - Request for two parking spaces near the door designated for alternative fuel vehicles. While we agree with this ~ , el efficient vehicles and a "greener environment, this is ot required by ordinan . Burger King is concerned that "preferential tre ent" for customers ecause they drive a particular type of vehicle may not be receive positively by all of their customers. Please note there wasn't even consensus on this item by the Commisioners. Item No.5 - Consider using a different lighting manufacturer because "LSI Lighting is cheap." .----: ()v- . !he Iigh~ing select~d ~~9~f the eXisti~~ feel it IS more Important In thiS case to contlnue-to-useltTe-s-ame lighting to give continuity to the overall development. Item No.6 - Request to screen the drive-up menu board with an architectural feature such as a wall. This was discussed with staff and we had agreed to provide tall landscape screening of the menu board. It should also be noted if the drive-thru windows were located on the north side of the building the menu boards would be located in the rear yard of the property .... ~-L~= Page 3 ~J and would be screened from U.S. 421 by the building. Again, would a variance t&..~6v-J allow the drive-thru window on the north side of the building be considered? ~ Our second concern is related to the variance request we have before the board of zoning to allow more than 16 square feet of menu board. Should we table our variance request until such time as we have agreed on the need for landscape screening or an architectural screen wall? ~~ Please note the Wendy's restaurant located north of this site has neither a screen wall nor landscape screening at their menu board. Item No.7 - Provide brick bases at structures for menu boards. Please note for the most part the supporting structure for the menu board is very low to the ground. We will comply with this request but need clarification as to what is requested for the menu board sign bases? Are you looking for post on each end so the menu board is similar to "monument sign"? Or is the concern of ~ this comment direct only towards the supporting structures? C C\.\fillf '-'\ \ ,d 1 Item No.8 - Staff Comment to provide additional screening for the roof access ladder. We understand your concerns but hope you would appreciate that safe use of the access ladder to the roof prevents us from adding screening further up on the ladder. It is our understanding these items will be discussed in further detail at the June 28th Special Committee meeting however, we would appreciate some immediate feedback so we can advise our client on the Variance Hearing scheduled for this coming Monday, June 25th. We must decide if we wish for these items to be heard or if we should ask for them to be tabled and continued to the July meeting so we would have time to work out these issues with the Plan Commission. We have appreciated the assistance of staff in working with us on this project and we look forward to your comments. . Sincerely, Dauss Architects Micahel R. Dauss CC: Dick Sampson .. Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2007 12:46 PM To: 'Mike Oauss' Cc: Holmes, Christine B; Sampson, Richard; Hollibaugh, Mike P Subject: RE: Burger King Mike - I am responding to your emailletter via email. I will add your comments and the commission's comments to the dept report for the June 28 meeting. II may be best to table your June 25 BZA variance items (parking, menu board, logo sign) until you get things worked out with the plan commission at the subcommittee level. You may have to add a variance for the location of the drive thru window, if your site layout will change. (Please let Christine and me know if you choose to table your variance items. let us know via email or fax. ) The site layout comment from the plan commission had to do with a conflict between those coming on off the access drive and wanting to turn into the stacking lane for drive thru. I think there was also a comment about the cross access easement to the south, and that it should be removed. If you can provide the subcommittee with an exhibit that shows adequate and safe traffic flow on the site, this may alleviate some of their concerns. Staff did not see an issue with the site layout. A variance request may be looked upon favorably by the BZA, for a drive thru window to be on the north side of the bldg, but Staff would need to see a revised layout. It may make sense to see if the subcommittee has further comments on the site layout and traffic flow. Perhaps presenting two site plan layout options may be best, if it is not too hard to do. The canopy comments were about the aluminum system canopy that has an order box on it. One pc member stated that it looks industrial and does not match the character of the site or development. There was talk about adding an 18-24 inch brick base to this structure. Perhaps this canopy structure and be removed altogether, leaving the clearance panel that states: clearance 8'6". The blue fabric awnings were not seen as a favorable color. Even though the overlay does not require specific awning colors, the plan commission does have the authority to review and approve colors. This is part of the ADLS process that the ordinance does spell out. At the subcommittee meeting, try to provide some exhibits showing different awning colors or shades of a darker blue. Noted: you will comply with the trash enclosure height request. Providing two 'green' parking spaces is NOT required by the ordinance. It is only a request from the plan commission, and an opportunity to go above and beyond what the ordinance requires. LSllighting does match the lighting of the existing development, and probably should not be changed. But it may earn you extra brownie points with the commission, if you do research another product that is similar but a little better quality. If menu board sere located on the north side of the building, a variance would NOT be required. The ordinance does not specify a menu board location on a site. A plan commission member did request a brick border around the menu board panel, and possibly on the back side of the menu board sign, to make the sign enclosed with brick. This was in addition to the request to provide 10-24 inch brick bases on the signs. I hope this addresses all of your comments. More discussion will take place at the committee meeting on June 28. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 6/20/2007 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 20077:58 AM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Holmes, Christine B; Sampson, Richard Subject: Burger King Please see attached response to comments received last night 6/2012007 Page 2 of2 '.1'.1 ~~~= DAUSS ARCHITECTS architecture plannmg 227 historic w. II Ih st. p.O. box 1006 anderson, in 46016 tel: 765.649.2258 fax: 765.649.2337 email: info@ da ussarch i tects .com - June 20,2007 City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Attn. Angie Conn Planning Administrator Ref. Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Angie The following items are in response to review comments received at the Plan Commission Public Hearing June 19,2007. Item No.1 - Two of the gentlemen on the commission commented that they did not like the site layout as presented. No specific reasons were indicated, but we are assuming they were commenting to traffic flow. We have two concerns for this comment. First if this is truly a concern why was this not addressed by staff prior to this meeting? We have complied with the ordinance requiring the drive-thru stack and drive-thru windows be located in the rear yard and rear of the building and have provided the required ten stack spaces. If this is truly a concern a much better approach may be to allow the drive-thru window service to be located on the north side of the building oriented towards the access drive to the Home Depot. This would facilitate a better flow around the building and eliminate the conflict we think was inferred by these comments. Would a variance to allow the drive-thru window on the north side of the building be considered? Our second concern is related to the variance request we have before the board of zoning to allow a reduction in the number of spaces required. Should we table our variance request until such time as we have a site layout and plan that is approved by the Plan Commission? Please note the Wendy's restaurant located to the north of our development has a similar layout for their entrance from the access drive and for their stacking space. I .."ill ~~I ~.~~ I Page 2 Item No.2 - Comment was made regarding the canopy over the Drive-thru order station. The blue color was questioned and I got the sense they did not like the awning itself. The ordinance does not address this canopy and we reviewed this with staff prior to the meeting agreeing to use a cloth awning in lieu of metal roofing. Please note this canopy also serves as a last warning for low clearance problems to prevent damage to the awnings requested at the cash window and pick-up window. We would also appreciate clarification on the comments concerning color. The overlay ordinance does not address the color of awnIngs. Please note the tenant shop property developed to the north of the site has blue awnings on the front and side elevations of the buHding and the Applebee's restaurant has the "Apple logo" on their awnings. Item No.3 - Trash enclosure height required to be taller than refuse boxes. We will comply and will verify with Burger King Corporation the height of the refuse boxes to be used at this site. Item No.4 - Request for two parking spaces near the door designated for alternative fuel vehicles. While we agree with this sentiment to encourage fuel efficient vehicles and a "greener environment, this is not required by ordinance. Burger King is concerned that "preferential treatment" for customers because they drive a particular type of vehicle may not be received positively by all of their customers. Please note there wasn't even consensus on this Item by the Commisioners. Item No.5 - Consider using a different lighting manufacturer because "LSI Lighting is cheap." The lighting selected matches the lighting of the existing development. We feel it is more important in this case to continue to use the same lighting to give continuity to the overall development. Item No.6 - Request to screen the drive-up menu board with an architectural feature such as a wall. This was discussed with staff and we had agreed 10 provide tall landscape screening of the menu board. It should also be noted if the drive-thru windows were located on the north side of the building the menu boards would be located In the rear yard of the property .1111 ~~. l: ~~ I Page 3 and would be screened from U.S. 421 by the building. Again, would a variance to allow the drive-thru window on the north side of the building be considered? Our second concern is related to the variance request we have before the board of zoning to allow more than 16 square feet of menu board. Should we table our variance request until such time as we have agreed on the need for landscape screening or an architectural screen wall? Please note the Wendy's restaurant located north of this site has neither a screen wall nor landscape screening at their menu board. Item No.7 - Provide brick bases at structures for menu boards. Please note for the most part the supporting structure for the menu board is very low to the ground. We will comply with this request but need clarification as to what is requested for the menu board sign bases? Are you looking for post on each end so the menu board is similar to "monument sign"? Or is the concern of this comment direct only towards the supporting structures? Item No.8 - Staff Comment to provide additional screening for the roof access ladder. We understand your concerns but hope you would appreciate that safe use of the access ladder to the roof prevents us from adding screening further up on the ladder. It is our understanding these items will be discussed in further detail at the June 28th Special Committee meeting however, we would appreciate some immediate feedback so we can advise our client on the Variance Hearing scheduled for this coming Monday, June 25th. We must decide if we wish for these items to be heard or if we should ask for them to be tabled and continued to the July meeting so we would have time to work out these issues with the Plan Commission. We have appreciated the assistance of staff in working with us on this project and we look forward to your comments. Sincerely, Dauss Architects Micahel R. Dauss CC: Dick Sampson Page 1 of3 Conn, Angelina V From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 2:29 PM To: 'Mike Dauss' Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Mike: Thanks for all your help with this plan. The Amur maackia is a rather bold choice. I do hot think that they will provide much shade to the parking lot, being a smaller tree, and I think they will require some early structural pruning to develop good structure (because of their branching habit), but they are unusual for this area. I will support their use. The plan is acceptable, thank you again. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 11:13 AM To: Brewer, Scott I Subject: Re: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Scott, Attached is our revised Landscape Plan for your review. Please feel free to contact me with your comments or questions. Mike Dauss 227 Historic West 11 th Street Anderson, IN 46016 1. 765.649.2258 F. 765.649.2337 ----- Original Message ----- From: Brewer, Scott I . T 0 :MiJs~.._Q9.J!~$. Cc: _C9.0D,..8ng~Un1'ljj' Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11 :06 PM Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Mike: Our standard for species diversity is normally limited to 15% for each species and 25% for each genus. You have the Acer genus as 69% of the species on this site. I know that it is a small site, anq that you have been asked by Duke to match the species along the roadways, but that diversity level is not acceptable to Carmel. Duke's plans for the entire site were a little different because it was such a large site and it contained a large number of plants and number of species. 6/15/2007 Page 2 of3 For the AR (Acer rubrum), I would suggest you go with something like the honeylocust you put in the parking lot, and for AF (Acer freemanii), I would suggest a larger maturing tree for more open areas like a shingle oak (Quercus imbricaria) or Kentucky coffee tree (Gymnocfanus dioica) or London plane tree (Platanus x acerifolia). That should take care of the diversity issues. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30,2007 1:39 PM To: Brewer, Scott I Subject: Re: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Could you e-mail me the detail for the "root flare" planting detail. On the tree species, please note we were matching planting along the entrance drive and the front of the development. But we will comply with your request for diversity. Thanks, Mike Dauss ----- Original Message ----- Fro m:E3re_vveCS<;Qttl. To: M.L~~....Q_9_Y.:?S Cc:GQDo~Angt111m~._Y. ; J::lQlmEl~Lc.bri~tinJLE3: ; .MiIJQb9..r:DJ.Q9.L~Q Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:20 PM Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Mike: Here are my comments on the Michigan Road Burger King landscape plan: 1. The Site will be covered by Section 26.04 Perimeter Bufferyard requirements and by the Michigan Road Overlay Zone. It requires a 30; Greenbelt across the front and an addition 6; planting strip across the front of the parking lot, 2. On the graphic planting detail, please change the note about placing the top of the root ball to the "root flare" must be placed even with the finish grade. We have a detail if you would require one. 3. Tree Species: For species diversity reason, we require that you limit individual species to 15% and genus to 25%. You have 100 many maple (Acer) species, and red maple are very thinned barked, and do not do well in parking 101s and paved situations. Please choose and alternative large maturing shade tree species to replace the Armstrong and Autumn Blaze cultivars. I have attached Carmel's list of recommended street trees, In the Greenbelt, oaks (not pin oaks), London plane tree, or Kentucky coffee tree would be good choices, in the parking lots, honeylocust, ginkgo, zelkova or Prairie Pride Hackberry would be good choices. 4. If another large maturing shade could be placed in the long planting island to the southeast of the building, it would shade the building (lowering energy costs) in the future. And could some ornamental trees be placed nearby the corners of the building, Please call or email if you have any questions. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square 6/15/2007 Page 3 of3 Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 20079:29 AM To: Brewer, Scott I Cc: Holmes, Christine B; Conn, Angelina V Subject: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Scott, We have not received your landscape comments. If they have been sent previously please send again. We would like to be able to incorporate your TAC comments into our information packets that are due next Friday so we would appreciate receiving them as soon as possible. Thanks for your assistance. Mike 6/15/2007 ~ , .(l Page 1 of2 Conn, Angelina V From: Brewer, Scott I Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2007 11 :07 PM To: 'Mike Dauss' Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Mike: Our standard for species diversity is normally limited to 15% for each species and 25% for each genus. You have the Acer genus as 69% of the species on this site. I know that it is a small site, and that you have been asked by Duke to match the species along the roadways, but that diversity level is not acceptable to Carmel. Duke's plans for the entire site were a little different because it was such a large site and it contained a large number of plants and number of species. For the AR (Acer rubrum), I would suggest you go with something like the honeylocust you put in the parking lot, and for AF (Acer freemanii), I would suggest a larger maturing tree for more open areas like a shingle oak (Quercus imbricaria) or Kentucky coffee tree (Gymnoc/anus dioica) or London plane tree (Platanus x acerifofia). That should take car~ of the diversity issues. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 3D, 2007 1 :39 PM To: Brewer, Scott I Subject: Re: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Could you e-mail me the detail for the "root flare" planting detail. On the tree species, please note we were matching planting along the entrance drive and the front of the development. But we will comply with your request for diversity. Thanks, Mike Dauss ----- Original Message ----- From :e.[~W~L_S_CQtU To: MjkJ~QClus~ CC:CQIlIl,il,ngE@JCl'l ;l-lglmg~,~Cbrj~tLIJ~.J2. ;Mi.!J.Qh'2m,~Q?(SJn Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 12:20 PM Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Dear Mike: Here are my comments on the Michigan Road Burger King landscape plan: 1. The Site will be covered by Section 26.04 Perimeter Bufferyard requirements and by the Michigan Road Overlay Zone. II requires a 30; Greenbelt across the front and an addition 6; planting strip across the front of the parking Jot, 6/13/2007 " " ... Page 2 of2 2. On the graphic planting detail, please change the note about placing the top of the root ball to the "root flare" must be placed even with the finish grade. We have a detail if you would require one. 3. Tree Species: For species diversity reason, we require that you limit individual species to 15% and genus to 25%. You have too many maple (Acer) species, and red maple are very thinned barked, and do not do well in parking lots and paved situations. Please choose and alternative large maturing shade tree species to replace the Armstrong and Autumn Blaze cultivars. I have attached Carmel's list of recommended street trees, In the Greenbelt, oaks (not pin oaks), London plane tree, or Kentucky coffee tree would be good choices, in the parking lots, honeylocust, ginkgo, zelkova or Prairie Pride Hackberry would be good choices. 4. If another large maturing shade could be placed in the long planting island to the southeast of the building, it would shade the building (lowering energy costs) in the future. And could some ornamental trees be placed nearby the corners of the building, Please call or email if you have any questions. Scott Brewer, City Forester Environmental Planner, DOCS City of Carmel, One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 PH: 317-571-2478 FAX: 317-571-2426 From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30,20079:29 AM To: Brewer, Scott I Cc: Holmes, Christine B; Conn, Angelina V Subject: Burger King West Carmel Marketplace Scott, We have not received your landscape comments. If they have been sent previously please send again. We would like to be able to incorporate your TAC comments into our information packets that are due next Friday so we would appreciate receiving them as soon as possible. Thanks for your assistance. Mike 6/13/2007 .... ~~~= DAUSS ARCHITECTS architecture planning 227 historic w. 11th 51. p.O. box 1006 anderson, in 46016 tel: 765.649.2258 fax: 765.649.2337 email: info@ daussarchitects. com TRANSMITT Ai Date: June 8, 2007 Attn: Angie Conn Planning Administrator To: City of Carmel Dept. of Community Services One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Items: 0 Urgent Sending: o Payment Requests [2J Documents o Samples o /~~ ~ _..~ ,f7,1~,~.:~ lor Jr. ". - , 1- I i From: Mike Dauss ", ~ Proj. No.: Proj.: Proposed Burger King Restaurant West Carmel Market Place Carmel, Indiana o For Approval Via: o For your Use o As Req uested o For Payment [2J Review DMail C2J Overnight Service o Messenger ( ) o UPS o Quantity Date Description DP/ADLS Information packets 15 6/8/07 2 sets 6/8/07 6/8107 DP/ADLS drawing sets revised per T AC comments CD with digital copies of DP/ADLS information Check #8599 in the amount of $1,779.00 for DP/ADLS 6/7107 T AC comment written response 6/8/07 Remarks: Docket Number 07040019 DP/ADLS. Please feel free to contact me with your comments or questions at the numbers above or e- mail: mikedauss@daussarchitects.com Copies To: Page 1 of 1 Conn, Angelina V -~~'",",~~~~'~""'~"""C~;CM~=,~-"~";..,,,,,_..___~~~~~_~___......o.. From: Holmes, Christine B Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:01 PM To: 'Mike DauBs' Cc: Conn, Angelina V Subject: RE: Burger King West Carmel Market Place Mike, In reviewing your petition, it looks as though you would need the following variances: 1. Metal awnings are not permitted in the Overlay District. You would need either a Variance of Development Standards (DSV), or change the material to cloth. 2. Signage is limited in the Overlay and further limited in this development. You would need variances for: a. Logo sign over 25% b. Two menu boards over six feet in height c. Two wall signs. d. One wall sign not oriented towards a public right-of-way e. Size and height of directional signage 3. Reduction in required parking spaces, unless documentation can be provided showing that parking will be shared with the rest of the retail center. Each of these issues would be treated as an individual variance. There have been a few sign variances granted in this pari of the city, but the signage is largely uniform. You may want to schedule a meeting with our Department to discuss possible amendments to the design. Regards, Christine Barton-Holmes Planning Administrator Department of Community Services City of Carmel One Civic Square Carmel, Indiana 46032 317.571.2424 317.571.2426 fax . . ~"""~'"""",r~,,,^',,~~--=-_",,~~,<~~,_,~_,____,,____,,.+~,,,,,,,,,,,,,<~~_,, From: Mike Dauss [mailto:mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Monday, May 07,2007 12:12 PM To: Holmes, Christine B Subject: Burger King West Carmel Market Place Christine, In you review of the drawings submitted for ADLS review will you advise us of any variance request we may need to file for at this time. We are planning on submitting fro variances this Friday. Thank you. Mike Dauss 51712007 .... ~~~= DAUSS ARCHITECTS architecture planning 227 historic w. 11111 st. p.o. box 1006 anderson, in 46016 tel: 765.649.2258 fax: 765.649.2337 email: i nfo@ daussarchitects.com TRANSMITT At Date: Apri I 19, 2007 From: Mike Dauss Attn: Project Review Proj. No.: Proj.: Proposed Burger King Restaurant West Carmel Market Place Carmel, Indiana To: T AC Members /' , "' j~) <rJ if!:T):';" . .~:.- ~ "t t~ '~,~ lip!. "/~/f /)... J{){,~, Items: 0 Urgent D Payment Requests rZ1 Documents D Samples o Sending: o For Approval Via: D For your Use o As Requested o For Payment IZ1 Review o Mail o Overnight Service o Messenger ( ) IZ1 UPS o Ouantitv Description Date I set 04/1 9/07 ADLS Submittal Remarks: This project has been filed with the Carmel Plan Commission for ADLS review. If you should have comments or questions please feel free to contact me at the numbers above ,or e-mail: mikedauss@daussarchitects.com Copies To: Page] of 1 Conn, Angelina V From: Mike Dauss (mikedauss@daussarchitects.com] Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 2:48 PM To: Conn, Angelina V Cc: Sampson, Richard Subject: Re: Burger King - West Carmel marketplace It was my understanding the Development Plan I DP Amendment Application was not required at this time. Please advise if we are to only complete pages one and two at th is time and file the other pages once we receive a Docket Number and the project develops. I can complete this form however we will need to forward it to you the first of next week after we receive Burger King Corporation Construction Manager's signature. Or can I sign this acting on their behalf as their agent? Mike Dauss ----- Original Message ----- From: Conn, Angelina V To: rsampson@whopper.com Cc: mikedauss@daussarchitects.com ; Holmes. Christine B Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 2:04 PM Subject: RE: Burger King - West Carmel marketplace Now it is attached. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 !!Gonll@carmel.in.qov From: Conn, Angelina V Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 1 :50 PM To: :r:1.Qmm~Qn@wb9PJ)~U::Qm' Cc: 'mikedauss@ldaussarchitects.com'; Holmes, Christine B Subject: Burger King - West Carmel marketplace Mr. Sampson - please submit a filled out Development Plan application to go along with the ADLS application you have already submitted. Thank you. The DP application is attached. Angie Conn, Planning Administrator Dept. of Community Services - Planning & Zoning 1 Civic Square, 3rd Floor City of Carmel, IN 46032 p.317-571-2417 f.317-571-2426 aconn@carmel.in.gov 4/30/2007 08/02/2005 13:19 IIII ~~I l.~~ I DAUSS ARCH I TEGS - architecture planning 227 historic w. 1 TO. st. p.o. box T006 :lnderson, in 46016 td: 7&5.&49.2258 fax: 765.649.2337 ematl: info@ daussarchitects.com 7555492337 DAUSS ARCHITECTS PAGE 01 FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION To: Matt Griffin From: F~)l;; 317/571-2426 Pages: Tel: 317/571-2417 Date: Re: Proposed Burger Ki ng Proj. No.: Cc: Proj. : Mike Dauss 2 (including this page) Proposed Burger King West Carmel Marketplace o Urgent ~~-= D Hard Copy to Follow t8J For Review [8] Please Reply Comments: This project is moving forward and Burger King Corpora.te is trying to identify costs that are not normal to their typical development. Attached are prototypical Building Elevations for your review. 'would appreciate any design comments you might haVE so I c:an forward them to Burger King's Design Department. Ple(ise note they are not proposing these Building Elevations for this location but are looking for some direction from your department for design development of the project. Lfl ye. -eJ..f/tI M7:Jn to 0/ q J L u. m . - ~&6' bq~'1~ 'l~~+ [CRt.eJ,eAf ~bV10 "UEl. ~:,;:;., \. ~', ! './ ~6. . \') '\ . ,,' . l d'5;)~i{) \. ~ ',I ~\..\,) l' ._ 'I,: ';\. i'~\C')'" <\"'~ )1- \<<_ \ \)'v _ ',.:" ~\., ..)~~ . "0'/ i !-.- ~'"" ""","~\:.';-' CONfiDENTIALITY NOTICE: Th~ documcnt~ Il('Cr>l'npanr.ing tI,is IL'llOCoPY tr~nsmissi()n contil;n (Onndl'lIli~llnforn'Wltjon. TI1E! inform,llia" i. inl~ndoo only fOr !II~ USE! ()f lh~ in<ii\ljduRI(~) or e'llity nnml'!cl ;;bovc. If yot. ;,,~ not Ih~ intended rl'cipil'lJI. you ~'C nollfied In" _,ny di5(:losurl', (npying, dl5lribulion. or Ih~ l""kinK "clion in reli;m(e on thE! conlan!. <)1 (h~ tdecopied in(orm1tliQn is not pl:'rmi~$ibl",. II YOII hOl"<:: recp.ived Ihi~ IclecoPY in t:'rrur, pl~a.~ MII{Y us by lell>pn(>~ ~t tl1c numh~r 1;~lcd abDve to ;>rr.lI'lge lor reTum on tile original dOCUtm:nll;, Page 1 of 1 http://static.flickr.com/21125800711_1 b07996d60jpg?v=Q 8/8/2006 Page 1 of 1 http://static.flickr.comI12/9 5072098 _ ccbfS S 192c.jpg?v=0 8/8/2006 Page 1 of 1 http://static.flickr.com/42/83361863_b721881fOSjpg?v=O 8/812006 Page 1 of 1 http://static.flickr.com/581165753996_c5b53503ff.jpg?v=O 8/8/2006 Page 1 of 1 http://static.flickr.com/661l96080945_6dd8d4785bjpg?v=O 8/8/2006 08/02/2005 13:19 7555492337 ~~ i~ ~ ~ ~f 1~ ~:1 ~~ 1~ it (! -=c:: ~~ cU- 1~ II ~~! J .= 1-~ ~L t -~ ~ (~ ~ ~ <5 1 \S]~ \. ~ ~tl "-.) -J_ 5 ~ ~l2, :3 0'.3 l::5 DtlUSS ARCHITECTS PAGE 02 I in Ii! I! ! Ii Ilt Ii III !! ~ iil L if 'I Ii jl ! D.."'~ Jz1 f I ~ at il flllh h, ;'11 11 II i iJ Iii 'i' ,II - , Ii, /~0-. <-~/\ \ , ,f:;,' ~~' ffl, ;r,,~\\ ' ~I ~ 'c:2- I - '~~ \ (::) -- "'""';' & 'c:; Q " I ',~ ' i;H ~ " , '~ (;? ;'-. , ~I I ''', /' 1 - ---/, '<. i ~ o. - ) ~ ~ 1 ~ <:0__ -J? Z ~ ~~ lr~~ ~ r ~ ~~ , ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '~~ ~{1--~ ~t .~ i ~ II ~ ~ .~ -+= ~ c;).- ~ ~ ~ -' \..U --i ~ .. , '0 <lll r , , ' , . , 1- - - --, - .~ " 0 1 ,. H "- < .. /I- ~ ~ II J ~ ~ _', - . . I . -" _ _' " c I ' ", Fax To: tti U.17~ au Fax: -::)-&~. M9 ~ Z'?;~1- From: Christine Barton-Holmes Pages: --:;(ncluding cover ~ to 1dtJf.R Phone: Date: Re:~~1W k:-1~ cc: o Urgent ifi:or Review o Please Comment 0 Please Reply 0 Please Recycle r1t(t 17 VVUh0 I --n"t tifrwvvl M~t1h t- -f'k- Otw-kwof-ec1 ()JMh ...{ ~0 f;<9 'I e><< ~ Mf ~. T l~ lRA- ~ \i;N1tl w I-,f-- 'i ,5I^ [M.Nt. .JfJ\'\Ut'f' t0t1 rTI0 · lLA~ ~Ollll G ~?i\1 "",1'7 evvft>>1' +UL V"t0 Christine Barton-Holmes Planning Administrator City of Carmel 317,571,2417 fax 317,571-2499 cholmes@carmel.in,gov II I,l II, Oli; .. ~.~ ~,'J" ,~ U~l~ ,J.,-' , ~ I I Ii j . ~ Ii li"'@. I OJ. I I' ~ ~4~ ::Si Ii ~ 'r"\ :.' I~ 1-1" " ~ ; I.I=~ I i I ~ ' i ~ : i U' ~~ ~ . f~ 'I . I~ ~ ~ ' ~ . -(" i r::t:: Z:;' ~ ... ~ ~ ~-<"!' ~~...... ~ ,~ . 0 ~ .il.. ~Z I'.... I - i ~ ' '! . 11 ~...:l. [I .,' ;.~I. . ~:. ;~:.!~ ~ "'=::I .. 1 ~ ~~=ll ~ . -< ~. ~ ~U ~. I. < ~ II' , ilU " 1~ L:" i ..... I' . ~~ tt. II ~ ~ ;~ ~ ~ ,i . ~ I rr ,j I~'~~~~ I " , II I I ,: ~' I' ~ ~ ~ i ...~ij !Af~ . ., _II i ! ,J" J>c ,:./ ~ RETAIL CENTER ELEVATIONS CCA1.It r.v...r.a- NO VEGETATION SHOWN RETAIL CENTER ELEV A TJONS ICAU:: .....r-r VEGETATION.. TIME OF PLANTING, YEAR 0 RETAIL CENTER ELEVATIONS IC.IoU.:r.r"....... VEGETATION" 5 YEARS i~-~Tf~'w~A-;;i~1iX[~JI f~~~K-E-T~P~~'0E-~TI1u'~'e,~"u~='~i - ~~~-~ I~ ".,.,.... ~ AUOOSTII.200' "'" ~ mALl\.! i "',".n =i"~~~~~"=-="-__""",~,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, "~'~--"-,-"...~......,....~...~~",,~,.....,,..,__,,"oI.~__ _=."..'L.=.."......-,~~~~._"' .""...~~"'--"'~""""""___.~~~~_ .~-~>.<......_~, ~~....~ o f.~ (~ (j) 8 l!) o /'.~~~:tk1 iiJ (i) (0) @ @l 10;;>'''---- u' ':'!'P":' ~~ -.....',:: (] (jJ 8' C'J Q) (0 C!) o (" @ o ," .~.~- ~-~! 1o--if-.:! - -"'~.a',~mI1~ ""'W..QU<<"(.f"B'Q::W.Il' -~- 'i' '. Il..o::~-"',.o;.. . ~ -~ ~:1;'K-{f"J:lI:r.-~~ 1.lDO,~~M~~-".- }"'-- ~~0SI-ml1ilr.>.:i:E ... 'l'-t" '"!iH-- 'B' SHOP ELEVATIONS %CALIl r......r.oo- :m..."!am111.i.!J.. \~L7Uil'ilelITmt!':l '--JIIl.~iJlO~ ~-<<J~u.n'~~-- ; / r~J-;j:;~~\v.ES'~C*:Ri~(EB~}C:\IF.~i'p~ L:A'C~-~Dtk;--'--=i~-~ l~ceJ, ,,,,,,,.... 01l01ln ll. zoo< " I) 1 ...... ,.to.... . . " ~ p ~ ~ ~ g ~ ,~~ ~ I ~) i r, ~ Ii -~B ~ ~ ~ , i ~I .~ <l' iI' :1 <l' 'I ~ ~ B ~ 5 ~ ~ ;,",,- "I f; "~ 2 ~ ,i,' 2 .~" u d~ d' r~ ~ E , ~ . ~ :i 3 ~ ~ * ~ H r,;., '-.J lj ~ .. t ~ ~~ ~ ~ ..q ~ ,h <( . ~ ..J <( ut ii:~ ~~ .. ~ .. ~ !'~~ . ~ ~~~ }'. tI) "./ Z /" 0 ~ ;> W ~ , ~ y~ ~ 0:: ~,~ ~ i'~ ~ ~ .__" f-< ~p Z ~",) u.l u 8 ..J :(t E-<~ ~. o::~ ~ iI' 6 .. .. 6 1- (~ \.j ~ 8 I , ~ i ii Ii ,I ; iJi i I O~"i , , tI'):; ~ ! If U~i!! 'Ir ,il II -----" , 'i' -- r Ij .:-1 II ri 1 ~! 'I' QJ. ..,'~. '. .2, I! -e!::S~1 " 'I ~QI' , ~ II i ,I I i i i"- il I j ~ r ~. I Iru 'I I < I I~ I il ~ , i~ I II r;, !: /- ! I ~ Ii 'I ~< ~ ~ <Z:! 'i . <:" i ~ ~_ Nil it Q I' ii !' Ii Z 1',1' ,I ...... I ' l~ . [. , . I il ~..Jl [~~~ I II t:t::: cr: ~ Ii Ii . <(' : :i Uu ~ !I , " I' ~ ~ i :1. II il ~ jj, iZ ! II. " II 1 ! 1-' I < I !I~ ! Iii ~I 11,'--" ',II, ,1- : ~ ;,~. ' 'I ~ ., iI' :.. .:'<< ~ .'i II .; I li ~ -:;;j II 0 -- : I f, I 1.11.a~' ! ~illl~.j ! __.._ I' WEST s.lH'__..... _ !'\. n .,.lH' Jw. g~ NORTH ._"!'~!DCA>'l'-fllNMZ ~c.w..."'!UllIM~ .'. '~04-mrm .=aM ~~ ~1IWW..f,1'!l'_ SOUTH ~~a...T-!lrWI!~ ~l'.l$r-r.ttll! ."""" .~ EAST RETAIL CENTER ELEVATIONS SCALD: r-II"...... I~.-'~:"::::~_.---W~~-S-.T-C: A'R."M~"-M:;:R-'- KE7 P~L'A-:C'-E--~-~ --- ---T-Cso--'-- !I~i ..~,.~..' 1 c.~~.~ ~..~. r N D I:'. ~,A I Dyke f e. , ,='c.'~~"""~"""""';O~'''''''''''''''_.'''~''''''~~'"''<-_'''''''-''"'''~''''''''''_''__~"~''''~'~'''-'~lI.''''''-~~~-=-':'-"""""-"""'""'~--'~'<>"''''';'''l':''''''\c~~,.,."."_.,,,-___,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,-,"..,,,t~-I.\_-''~~,~.~"""'~~-"'""_''''''''''a_""""",..,.,~.-~.~e....,..."",.-,'t",~;.;..-.=--_.,/;>';-.;o____, ~-~ ~" CD ~~MOZll I'/iJ,lIMl;.:j --- ~~~~ --.... ~a:;Ll;I!WOO".,...~l.IfII'l! d!:u~m:CU;j,:JIo.<.v:;;;<mr '~I&"'-~~:lmno. ~ !!"! /( - ~~CWN;.~ ~--._~,I.j.l)tcr.mol:\.'fi''''''' ,. ~4' -".~ --~--c1;II3JI::':l.COI:I<I'J. J.'I.:l!'.'lJO:/1trill ~1<l::i';':lll; --~:Qlfr CMJ'~iII!~ ,""'~'D:.'--:t':):m:!II1:W -~ Q) 1:::=n~(uo.~~~I;.o.'L~ Mill~~_ .'__ "._tQI"-II'Jo.l.~;c.~[zmI:', C / ~:i',S7-.--:tl1I.~ ~,P"--- ~1oWI',CIl:'Ell;..wM '... ~.,. ~D~m;~.n~A1[lPl,mc'= ~ ,"! RETAIL CENTER ELEVATIONS K:AJ.JI.,rr.r~ ,--"--- I 2~--- ,--- 3 ---, ---I r- ~'l'fT!PD-cL"I9II!a~-\\ ~J.IlIttIlDolc:llr-l<1 """ $~ cj) ~'~~,",12.i~'" "'-~ @ \ " \ ~. ~1& JI//IJ.I, WI4;:"-l.I.UlI ~ , fIO;lU:_.l:C. , '-'[lW~~'tJI1'>1:~ ~~~~ Di'/~::J.Z;'~ ..rAiD~'.]f;a;~-' ;l::tg~~~.oKI~ .-, ... ~ RERnn: ~.WOI :'e"i'I\1 ~ '~~ ~~~~~ /:>::~/: ~~7=~~ ~H TYPICAL WALL -=.u.ll: r-r.#-#' ,- - 4 -------1 - 5 -------, .~~~~~-;J~~,..-~~~""""___~~~"""_"""...='8O>~\'_--'- ~:~ II[A~: 3d; W.E.S.T ~-"'-----~"'~~ttl.,~"""",,,-~-IDJ~~~"""'--~''-I,~",,~"t!.."''--~~'~''ii''''''''''~';;;:il'i"I"~~'''- .. 16' ~u~~ C'A.R-M'E"L CARMEL, AUOt! 5-T il. ;zo 0' 211] 7 ~'A"R.K.E.T.P.L.A"C.E INDIANA ---'-D'""'~i;-=--~~'~~"=-~' U11e' i t<.':::::. N , ltltenMa 12TAI. :1l1li..1.:1....'. ~-"''-''-''''~.~~..~.=~~=-.Lltrw.,., -",~~,~.~,=-__""=o:=__"---,.. "-,-'-, '-'-"'~~"""-~~-"'_I"""~- .- '~f-!p.,.~~"",~=,-""""",,,,"""="<:c'