HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
FINDINGS OF FACT FORM
FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION
Carmel Plan Commission
Carmel, Indiana
OGoSo d z..C
DOCKET NO. pp
NAME OF SUBDIVISION: C~4 yo C R ,;;;:q '<.
PETITIONER: fOE. D:CYEL~PrnS:::"'J-;- Con-'P.P'1Hy jH<-
Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and
certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, I determine that the plat
complies with standards of the Cannel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance.
I
'""
I hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to
by the petitioner.
Condition 1.
Condition 2.
Condition 3.
I hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
DA TED TIDS '2. f .,;,';- DAY OF .A u ~ <.,l Y'"
,20 0 7 .
Commission Member
Z:\shared\forms \PC app lications \prirnaryplat
Rev. 01/03/2006
CARMEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION WAIVER
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No.: 0 co 050 CoL..::. pp
NAME OF PROJECT: Clay Creek
Petitioner: MHE Development Company. INe
Section Varied: 07.05.07(2)
Brief Description of Variance: To pennit clearing of greater than 15% of natural woodlands
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the
Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare ofthe corrununity.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse marmer.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and
UlUlecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based upon all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision
vanance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this 21 ~r day of /IU/'i.. , 201}<<: 7
Commission Member
HIBRADIZONlNG& REAL ESTATE MATIERSIMllElCARMill. PRIMARY PLATIF OFF05050006SW.DOC
rev. 01/04/05
CARMEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION WAIVER
FINDINGS OF FACT
DocketNo.: OG=S-dc-;L.o PP
NAME OF PROJECT: Clay Creek
Petitioner: MHE Development Company. INC
Section Varied: 06.03.07
Brief Description of Variance: Length of street concluding in cul-de-sacs
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance. the
Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions ofthe neighborhood.
The strict applicatjon of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and
unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
The grant ofthe variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based upon all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision
variance.
I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
L
2.
3.
Dated this Z/Y day of !ltlc.. , 200A.7
Commission Member
H;\BRADIZONTNG & REAL ESTATEMATlERSIMHEICARMEL PRIMARY PLAN OF F 05050006SW#2cDOC
rev 01/04/05
CARlVlEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
ZONING WAIVER
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No.: OG 0 5" C 02..:..) Po
NAME OF PROJECT:
Clay Creek
Petitioner: Me Development Company. Inc.
Section Varied:
6.05.07
Brief Description of Zoning W mver:
To permit residences on certain lots to not face external streets
]n deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a zoning
waiver, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
The grant of a zoning waiver will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and
general welfare of the community.
The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse manner.
The need for the zoning waiver arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and
unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the zoning waiver is sought.
The grant of the zoning waiver does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan.
Based upon all the evidence presented by the Petitioner, 1 approve of the requested zoning waiver.
I hereby disapprove of the zoning waiver request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this '2.. I ,j:r day of /J u c......., " ,- , 2003": "7
Commission Member
H:\brad\Zoning & Real Estate Matters\lndiana Land Dev\Carmel-12l st Street Filo\Zoning Waiver # I.doc