HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR
PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION
Carmel/Clay Plan Commission
Carmel, Indiana
DOCKET NO. 94-02 P.P.
NAME OF PROJECT: Lakeside Park Subdivision
PETITIONER: Roehling Enterprises, bIe.
X- Based upon all the evidence presented by the Petitioner and upon the Department
Report of th.e Department of Community Services dated September 17, 2002, we
determine that the Primary Plat complies with the standards setforth in
Carmel/Clay Subdivision Regulations.
_ 'We hereby approve of the Primary Plat as submitted with the following specific
conditions as agreed to by the petitioner.
Condition 1.
Condition 2.
_ \Ve hereby disapprove of the Primary Plat as submitted for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
DATED THIS -1-7
,2002.
Presiclen ,- Carmel/Clay Plan Commission
Secretary, Cannel/Clay Plan Commission
CARMEL/CI~A Y PLAN COMMISSION
Carmel, Indiana
SUBDIVISION VARIANCE
FINDINGS OF FACT
Docket No.: 94-02a SW Petitioner: Roehhng Enterprises, Inc.
Section Variance: 6.3.15 BricfDescription of Variance: To allow a reduction in the radius ofa
Residential Street from 150 feet to 85 feet.
In deciding whether or not the applicant has presented sufficient proof to pennit the granting of a
variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following:
1/1 The grant of a variance will not be injmious to the public health, safety, morals and general
welfare of the community.
1/1 The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be
affected in a substantially adverse maImer.
" The need for the variance arises fronl some condition peculiar to the property and such
condition is 110t due to the general conditions of the neighborhood.
iii The strict application of terms ofthe ordinance to the property will constitute all unusual and
unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought.
1/1 The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the comprehensive plan.
X Based on aU the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve ofthe requested subdivision
vanance.
_ J hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons:
1.
2.
3.
Dated this fl day of ~~
Presiden . CanneVClay Plan Commission
Secretary, Carmel/Clay Plan Commission