Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes TAC 04-17-02 .: CARMEL/CLAY TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES April 17 , 2002 Laurence Lillig - DOCS Brian Hanson -DOCS Gary Hoyt - Carmel Fire Dept. Chuck Shupperd - Vectren Energy Phil Bennett - Carmel Parks Bill Akers - Communications Mike McBride - Carmel Engineer. Jim Blanchard - Carmel Bldg. Dept. Jon Dobosiewicz - Carmel DOCS Tom Skolak - Carmel Postmaster Steve Broermann - Ham.Co.Highway Sharon Prater - Panhandle Eastern Dean Groves - CinergyfPSI Dick Hill- Carmel Engineering John South - Ham. Co. Soil & Water Steve Cash - Ham. Co. Surveyor's s:T echnicalAdvisoryCormnittee \!\1inutes \tac2 002apr 1 .' '. St. Peter's Church, parking lot expansion (Development Plan Amendment) The applicant seeks approval to expand their parking area and make site drainage modifications, The site is located at 3106 East Cannel Drive. The site is zoned R-lIResidence. Filed by David R. Barnes of Weihe Engineers for St. Peter's United Church of Christ. David Barnes and Corrie Meyer presented the case. This is an application for two phases of a proposed parking lot located at the comer of Keystone Avenue and Carmel Drive. Plans have been distributed to TAC members; some responses have been received. Tom Skolak had no comments. Dick H1ll will write comments, He inquired about the time line. The church addition will not be done for a couple of years. The parking lot will be done now. On sheet 2, the dark rectangle at northeast comer is a shed. Dave Bames believes there will be a play area there too. The Keystone right of way lines should be labeled. The Carmel Drive right of way lines should be labeled and dimensions noted. The 20-year Thoroughfare Plan calls for a 40-foot right of way. This has not changed since the November 1999 Thoroughfare Plan. A 10- foot multi use path is required. Mr. Hill stated when the entrance is redone; the path should travel east to take pedestrians out to Keystone Avenue. There is a sidewalk on the east side that stops at the entrance. Laurence Lillig checked the half right of way. It is 45 feet. Jon Dobosiewicz asked the petitioner to depress the curb to accommodate the path but to not install the path to Keystone. There is no way to cross at this time. The path should be installed from the driveway east. The street on the south side of Cannel Drive needs to be identified. Corrie Meyer responded that trees do exist over the outlet pipe. A storm sewer is also there. lfthe stann sewer is removed, one small tree will be lost. Mr. Bames stated the trees exist, but it will be set between the trees. On the original set of drawings on sheet 4 of the landscape plan, there are trees in the emergency spillway of the detention pond. Dave Barnes will check this. He needs to provide elevations of the concrete swale. The relocated Cannel Drive widths are needed along with traffic directional arrows. The @pposing left lanes should be aligned. The standard length for collector street acce1lanes is a 100 taper. The dece1 lane should be 100 feet with a 100-foot taper. The width for both is 12 feet Mr. Hill requested a right of way pavement section for that part of the entrance. The standard 1S 1.5, 4, and 9 for collector streets. The Utility Department will decide if there is additional sewer and water. A commercial curb cut approval is needed for the relocated entrance. A temporary construction entrance plan is needed for the Board of Public Works. A consent to encroach agreement is required for any pemlanent improvement in the right of way. Bonding will be required. Dick Hill will write a follow up letter. Gary Hoyt will write a letter. He understands the left turn lane of the church entrance will be moved directly across from left turn lane (Waterford Lane) oftlle subdivision. s:T echnicalAdvisoryCommi ttee \Minutes \tac2 002apr 30 " Steve Cash stated no County drains are affected by this project. He will defer to the City Engineer. Bill Akers bad no comments. John South wrote a letter. The erosion control plan can be improved with inlet protection. Mr. Barnes should call with questions. An updated plan was distributed. Dean Groves has some maj or concems. On sheet three, a detention pond is shown around a switchgear in the southwest comer. There is a power cable along the north side of East Carmel Drive. A potential problem exists if excavating is done there. The Cinergy mapping system was nonexistent when this was installed. Jon Dobosiewicz understands Mr. Bames will file the ADLS application soon. A lighting plan is needed. There is no maximum height requirement in the 431 Overlay. Mr. Lillig requested that poles not be taller than 24 feet and flat lenses screen the highway. The ADLS application will go to committee only. May 14th is the next meeting date. Mr. Barnes said he is able to file the application for landscaping and lighting. Laurence Lillig said Engineering would supply dedication forms. The property line runs down the center of the site. There are two parcels and two deeds. The church holds ownership of both. Laurence Lillig is concemed that setbacks are from the lot line. The petitioner should combine two tracts into a single parcel while they are dedicating the right of way. The deed search shows no access easement to the north. There is an existing ground sign at the comer of Keystone Avenue and Carmel Drive. The drainage proposed along Keystone seems to affect that sign. Mr. Lillig wants to know where it will be located and how will it affect the topo. Several existing trees will be affected. The site landscape plans seems to show that all trees will remain. Mr. Lillig needs to know how this will be accomplished. Scott Brewer will comment on landscaping in his letter. s: Tee hnica lAdvisoryCommi ttee \i\1inutes \tac2 00 2apr 31