Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact u (j j' CARMELlCLA Y PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION V ARJANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I, LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cui-de-loop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permi t the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The Ileed for the variance arises from Some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially \vith the Comprehensive Plan. 25- Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21st day of May, 2002. , ll1bl INDSOI DRW 496221 vI u u " CARMEL/CLA YPLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-], LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum cllrve radius for cul-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the propelty will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. v Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 2]st day of May, 2002. f2;~I/?!t4 ComrnlsslOn Member (NDSOI DRIV 496221vl u u CARMELlCLA YPLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SlJBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I, LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-de-loop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to pen11it the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant ofa variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat ,viII not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the'variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application oftenm of the ordinance to t]1e property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship ifapplied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. j Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: L 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. IND501 rlRW 496221vl ~ ~I"~ Commission Mem er u u CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDrVISION VARIANCE FINDlNGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I. LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of V ariance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cuI-dc-loop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting ofa variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance wi 11 not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value ofarea adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application oftelTllS of the ordinance to the propelty will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied [0 the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensi ve Plan. x Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested suhdivision variance. [ hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. INlJSUl DRW 4%221vl reMSOV\- u u CARMEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION Carmell Indiana SUBDlVISION V ARJANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-023 SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I, LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting ofa variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance wi]] not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat \vili not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application oftem1S of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the propelty for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially \vith the Comprehensive Plan. ,L, Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, T approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of f11e subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. JNDSOI DRW 4%221v] u u CARMEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: G WZ Development-1, LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver ofminirnum curve radius for cuI-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the appl ication has presented sufficient proofto permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general weItare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms ofthe ordinance to the property wi 11 constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. r Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. 'k~~-/~ I. mmission Member INDSOI DRW 496221 vI u u CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel1 Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Devclopment-], LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the appl ication has presented sufficient proof to pe1111it the granting of a variance, the Plan Conm1ission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and genera] welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the propelty for which the variance is sought. The grant ofthe variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. ~ Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision vanance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. Commission Memb0r INDSOI DRW 49622]vl u u CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION V AUJANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development- L LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver ofminimul11 curve radius for cuI-de-loop Tn deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proofto permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substanti ally adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms ofthe ordinance to the propeliy will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensi ve Plan. V Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve of the requested Y'"'-subdi vision variance. 1 hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: \ 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21st day of May, 2002. ~,~ INDsnl DRW 496221.-1 w u CARMEL/CLA Y PLAN COMMISSION Carmel. Indiana SUBDIVISION V AlliANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I. LLC Section Variance: 6.3 .15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permit the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application ofterms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantia)]y with the Comprehensive Plan. /' Based on all of the evidencc presented by the petitioner, 1 approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. (:=-~6~ --- Commiss.\011-M mber lNDSO I DRW 49022],] u u CARMEL/CLAY PLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION V AH.JANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I. LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-cle- loop 111 deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to permi t the granting of a variance, the Plan Commissi.on should consider the following: The grant ofa variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals ancl general welfare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The neecl for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application of terms of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the property for which the variance is sought The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. .~;L Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, T approve of the requested subdivision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st clay of May, 2002. ~ ~., ~on;miS;ion ;:;nber INOSOI ORW 49622] vi u u CARMEL/CLA YPLAN COMMISSION Carmel, Indiana SUBDIVISION VARIANCE FINDINGS OF FACT Docket No.: 42-02 PP and 43-02a SW Petitioner: GWZ Development-I. LLC Section Variance: 6.3.15 Brief Description of Variance: Waiver of minimum curve radius for cul-de-Ioop In deciding whether or not the application has presented sufficient proof to pell11it the granting of a variance, the Plan Commission should consider the following: The grant of a variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general wel fare of the community. The use and value of area adjacent to the property included in the proposed plat will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner. The need for the variance arises from some condition peculiar to the property and such condition is not due to the general conditions of the neighborhood. The strict application oftem1s of the ordinance to the property will constitute an unusual and unnecessary hardship if applied to the propeny for which the variance is sought. The grant of the variance does not interfere substantially with the Comprehensive Plan. /' Based on all of the evidence presented by the petitioner, I approve 0 f the requested subdi vision variance. I hereby disapprove of the subdivision variance request for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. Dated this 21 st day of May, 2002. INDSOl DRW 4%221v1 '; u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR ..,. PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETI~IONER: GWZ Development-I. LLC ~ Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Commnnity Development, I determine that the plat complies with standards of the Cumel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. 7t W:L ~~ I hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specil1c conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition 1. Condition 2. Condition 3. I hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons; 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 2] st DA Y OF May, 2002. ~ Commission Member s: \p JanCOl11111 \a ppl icm. pc\primplat .apx Rev. 11/7/2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick P;x.ON ER: GWZ Development-I, LLC Based upon all the cvidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, I determine that the plat complies with standards flf the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby approvc of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as ag..ced to by the petitioner. Condition I. Condition 2. Condition 3. J hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: I. 2. 3. DA TED THIS 2 J 5t DAY Of May, 2002 s :\p lancomm \appl ictn. pc\pri mpla t. apx Rev. 11/7/2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Ca.rmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIONER: GWZ Development-I, LLC .~ Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitiuner and upon the representations and certificatiuns of the staff of the Department of Community Development, I determine that the plat cumplies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hneby approve of tbe primary plat as submitted with the following spedfil~ conditions as agreed tu by the petitioner. Condition 1. Condition 2. Condition 3. [ hereby disallPrOVC of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: I. 2. 3. DA TED THIS 21st DAY OF May. 2002. C1cI)~ CommlsslOll Member S: \p lancomm \app I ictn.pc\primp I at. apx Rev. 11/712000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission CarmeJ, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIONER: GWZ Deve1opment-l, LLC ~. Based upon alllhe evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Departmcnt of Community Development, I deter-mine that the plat complies with standards of thc Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby allllrovc of the primary plat ;IS submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition I. Condition 2. Condition 3. I hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 21 st 0/\ Y OF May, 2002. s: \p lancomm \app I i ctn .pc \primp I at. apx Rev. 1117!2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIgl>l-ER: G WZ Devclopment-l, LLC V Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, 1 determine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby allllrove of the primary plat as snbmilted with the following speci.fic conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition 1. Condition 2. Condition 3. ] hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 21st DAY OF May, 2002. s: \p lancomm \app lietn. pc\primp lat. apx Rev. 11/7/2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETrNER: GWZ Development-I, LLC Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, [ determine that lhe plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by tbe petitioner. COlldition I. Condition 2. Condition 3. I hereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted fur the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. DATED TT-IIS 21st DA Y OF May, 2002. ~ CUTTlIll sion Member s: \plancomm\app I ictn. pe\pri mp lat.apx Rev_ 11/712000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIONER: GWZ Development-I. LLC ?f!). X Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, J determine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinancc. ] hereby alllJrOVe of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition I. Condition 2. Condition 3. Thereby disapprove of the primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: 1. 2. 3. DATED THIS 21 51 DAY OF May. 2002. s:\plancomm\appl iCln.pc\primplat.apx u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIONER: GWZ Development-I, LLC )(/ Based upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and / certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, [ determine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. [ hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition 1. Condition 2. Condition 3. [ hereby disapprove of the primary plat as snbmitted for the following reasollS: I. 2. 3. DATED THIS 21st DAY OF May, 2002. cmmtL?!:::'#~ s :\p lancomm\appl ictn. pc\pri III p lat.apx Rev. 11/7/2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PET~R: GWZ Development-I, LLC lJased upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, I detennine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. [ hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition 1. Condition 2. Condition 3. 1 hereby disallPrOVe of' the primary plat as submitted for the followi ng reasons: L 2. 3. DA TED THIS 21 st OA Y OF May, 2002. ~-1-4L s: \p 1 anCO!T1m \app 1 ictn. pc \pri mp lat.apx Rev. 11/7/2000 u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PETITIONER: GWZ Development-I, LLC i/ B<lsed upon all the evidence presented by the petitioner and upon the representations and certifications of the staff of the Department of Community Development, I determine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Subdivision Control Ordinance. ] hereby allPrOVe of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by the petitioner. Condition l. Condition 2. Condition 3. ] hereby disapprove of the primary plat as snbmitted for the following reasons: l. 2. 3. DATED THIS 21st DA Y OF May, 2002. -------- /,// '/--~~ ------- -- -~ - Commission Meiilbcr ,(\A;yt.~ ~ Rev 111712000 s: \pl ancomm \app I ictn. pc\pri mp I a t ,apx u U FINDINGS OF FACT FORM FOR PRIMARY PLAT CONSIDERATION Carmel Plan Commission Carmel, Indiana DOCKET NO. 42-02 PP and 43-02A SW NAME OF SUBDIVISION: Sedgwick PET~ER: GWZ Development-I. LLC Based upon all the evidence presented by tbe petitioner and upon the representations and eertilieations of the staff of the Department of Commnnity Development, I determine that the plat complies with standards of the Carmel Clay Suhdivision Control Ordinance. I hereby approve of the primary plat as submitted with the following specific conditions as agreed to by tbe petitioner. Condition I. Condition 2. Condition 3. I hereby disapprove oCthe primary plat as submitted for the following reasons: I. 2. 3. DA TED THIS 21st DA Y OF May, 2002. &/'~b!n44#7J s: \p lancomm\applicln. pe\pri mp I al. aflx Rev. 11/7/2000