The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCorrespondence - negative ""7 ' ,,,.-, J. :J~+ '''C:::'-D\'\I \ \<OCro \...:> . r If. . L... '(]\--r?iL'<-~'~ . J:>-\/h;S ,., or o..cd '. u~ . -I' do, \\A ~, . " cd Y, I eJ I\f\ 'U1-"-:p.pK' 'v....... .", -. .... CL.. <~:s. I I r ......, . L/ . '- , ..', (..L, V\.,U't- COv1"- e .....I'.~ \ r -\ ,-yt-\i 1. ~ v.. .. ,..L, .. ,;.~,""'-'i V'-1. P . . Asso \.,f?~"'-'-'''''' '. ) -t'^ ---tlr-v J ~O~,+- v-P I . \ \ . L~ ~",-",.~ V-J ~-...s c; <tJ; .a .' ..-c..~ \ 4 y't'cr;' _ ..~-(.\'W--A.... JlA \1\ ~'rf'1 .?-'\ \ ~ VV"\ e-y:.; 1 -r\-~A- ~.~ \ \,,~AJ-- w&t-, --\"k M,,"I"':~~l\ot~~~1p~~ U\~....... ''3 ~'l' rei ~M~ \,---- . . 'S 'rv1 .-..J ... '-k d -' L~~"-1 ' ! Thank you for inviting the Architectural Control Committee to your home on n.'V'::' ,--,\';~I If}, Tuesday, May 21stto review your landscaping proposal. We appreciate the fact i" --\-1., IS that you wish to abide by the covenants and are seeking approval from the r-'\-' ';tlL ~ appropriate committee before starting these changes. ;?;. . . v ~ St&I~~ Due to the extensive nature of your plans, which includes hardscape and \-"'~:::\ ~ . , softscape changes, it was very beneficial for the committee to be shown the yard '.S'i c:> 1'-" ~~~ layout and discuss your proposal in detail. Since there are so many changes being discussed, a breakdown by project is best. l I cJ-:t- \ --z.. ('l- . __ __' ." \ '<:) i ~ 1 May 22. 2007 Jon and Lila Jay 302 Pintail Court Carmel, IN 46032 RE: Landscaping Proposal for Lot #10 Dear Jon and Lila, 1. 2' Retaining Wall - composed of keystone material that will extend on North side of property. This item is approved with the understanding that it is the homeowner's responsibility to maintain adequate drainage that will not adversely affect any adjacent property. 2. Backfill - to occur on north side of property from house to retaining wall which is to provide a more gradual slope on property. This item is approved with the understanding that it is the homeowner's responsibility to maintain adequate drainage that will not adversely affect any adjacent property . 3. Removal of existing wood deck. This item is approved. 4. Addition of 404 Sq. Ft. Patio. To replace wood deck and be constructed of Paver stones. This item is approved. 5. Addition of Natural.stone steppers from new paver patio to existing driveway. This item is approved. 6. Extension to existing beds and addition of new beds. This includes plantings and location of such as shown on the submitted diagram to the ACe on May 21,2007. This item is approved. 7. Addition of Solid Cedar wood fencing to connect to existing wall and outline rear and side property line. This item as proposed is denied. 8. Addition of iron mesh fencing (as pictured with 5/22 email) to connect to existing wall and outline rear and side property line. This item is denied. By establishing a clear standard within the community, we want to eliminate controversy among the individual homeowners. The standards are as follows: . All fencing and rehab fencing must be approved. . No fencing on lake lots. . Black, wrought~iron style fencing only. o Fence to sit 2' inside side-lot boundaries unless written approval of neighboring lot owner to place on property line. Exception given to Lot 39-40 where fencing will be allowed on property line and will attach to Frontage fencing. . Fence must be at least 4' high and not to exceed 6' high. As mentioned, the two fences in the neighborhood that do not meet these guidelines were constructed prior to the homeowners taking control of the Homeowners Associaticl,n from the Developer. Fencing has always been a sensitive issue for parents and pet owners alike. It is apparent you and Lilah have put a tremendous amount of time and energy on your landscaping proposal. We are not ignoring or belittling your concerns/needs, but are trying to maintain consistency. Please feel free to submit other fencing options for review. . Sincerely, Spring Lake Estate$ Homeowners Association Architectural Control Committee Art Kirschmann Tammy Reedy Kathy Stetler Dave Shell Variance Page 1 of 1 Kathy Stetler From: Kirschmann, Art [Art.Kirschmann@Liberty.RolIs-Royce,com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 20071:23 PM To: 'kstetler@earthlink.net' Subject: Variance It'appears that we have been duped again by Mr. Jay and the Board. It is reprehensible that the signage announcing the zoning variance request was not displayed within the subdivision and the community not informed by the board. This demonstrates the Board's penchant for self-service. The fence should not be allowed since it contravenes the zoning requirements and the subdivisions fencing guidance. Arthur Kirschmann 378 Pintail Ct. This emaH message and any attachments are for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain proprietary and/or confidential information which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipients, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy the original message and any copies of the message as well as any attachments to the original message. This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 12/17/2007 Page 10f2 Kathy Stetler From: Inefouse@aoLcom Sent: Monday, December 17,20071:19 PM To: kstetler@earthlink.net Subject: Re: VERY IMPORTANT: Zoning Meeting Tonight for 302 Pintail Court Fence Kathy, Is this shit over that fie.akin fence going to continue..Vote for me what you think best and I'llubstantiate whatever you think is besLall I know is that continual shitbetter end soon Of I'll dig into my wallet and f... up a bunch of people financially uL V\ c \ \ ~..(..t\ Gt- ~L(~ \ . -~---Original Message----- From: Kathy Stetler <kstetler@earthlink.net> To: 'Matthew McDonald' <matthew.mcdonald.is16@statefarm.com.>; jjay@fullerengr.com; jlgreenberg@ameritech.net; dkellison@blueandco.com; abkir@attglobal.net; mbernstein@ksmcpa.com; wmcgee2@yahoo.com; kiunghuhn@brickyard.com; rgotschall@indy.IT.com; pkhurana@iupui.edu; Switzldl@ao1.com; simon ..-Sao@conseco;com; xmgao@sbcglobal.net; zhang_Iiz@yahoo.com; drhnp@yahoo.com; Dbryant@cgcu.com; wm.carr@sbcglobal.net; reelpipe@aoLcom; haag)cathy _ m@lilly .com; Imiddleton@indy.IT.com; dws44@sbcglobal.net; davidwalsh@hamiltontitle.com; don@coachpotato.com; chrisl@lafeverelectric.com; jaybrill@nbofi.com; wkp5851 @earthlink.net; dehayes@indiana.edu; bjwirth@gmail.com; Reedyklein@ao1.eom; Lori.McClintic@Roche.com; ohsdentallab@msn.com; Inefouse@aol.com; theron.j .nesbit@rolls-royce.com; aspensley@indy.rr.com; btownsend@townsendfunding.com; deehixx@hotmail.com Sent: Mon, 17 Dee 2007 10:21 am Subject: VERY IMPORTANT: Zoning Meeting Tonight for 302 Pintail Court Fence Good.Morning Spring Lake Estates Homeowners Association Members, There is a variance request coming before the Zoning Board this evening for the FENCE at 302 Pintail Court (owned by our Board of Directors Member, Jon Jay). This fence, which does not follow the guidelines of Spring Lake Estates fencing requirements, also does not follow the City of Carmel fencing requirements. It exceeds 6 feet in height. Unfortunately, our Board of Directors did not notify the Association Members of this zoning variance hearing. If possible, please plan on attending the meeting at 5:30 this evening on the 2nd Floor of City Hall. If you are not available to attend. feel free to email your comments to me and I will read them at the meeting. The City notice is posted below. Thank you, Kathy Stetler 846-5799 12/17/2007 Jon Jay Subject: Kathy Stetler [kstetler@earthlink.net] Monday, December 17, 2007 10:22 AM . 'Matthew McDonald'; jjay@fullerengr.com; jlgreenberg@ameritech.net; dkellison@blueandco.com; abkir@attglobal.net; mbernstein@ksmcpa.com; wmcgee2 @yahoo,com; kiunghuhn@brickyard.com; rgotschall@indy.rr,com; pkhurana@iupui.edu; Switzld 1 @aol.com; si mon_gao@conseco,com; xmgao@sbcglobal.net; zhangJiz@yahoo.com; drhnp@yahoo.com; Dbryant@cgcu.com; wm.carr@sbcglobal.net; reelpipe@aol.com; haag_kathy-m@lilly,com; Imiddleton@indy,rr.com; dws44@sbcglobal.net; davidwalsh@hamiltontitle,com; don@coachpotato,com; chrisl@lafeverelectric.com; jaybrill@nbofi.com; wkp5851@earthlink.net; dehayes@indiana.edu; bjwirth@gmail.com; Reedyklein@aol.com; Lori. McClintic@Roche.com; ohsdentallab@msn.com; Inefouse@aol.com; theron.j. nesbit@rolls-royce.com; aspensley@indyrr.com; btownsend@townsendfunding.com; deehixx@hotmail.com VERY IMPORTANT: Zoning Meeting Tonight for 302 Pintail Court Fence From: Sent: To: Good Morning Spring Lake Estates Homeowners Association Members, There is a variance request coming before the Zoning Board this evening for the FENCE at 302 Pintail Court (owned by our Board of Directors Member, Jon Jay). This fence, which does not follow the guidelines of Spring Lake Estates fencing requirements, also does not follow the City of Carmel fencing requirements. It exceeds 6 feet in height. Unfortunately, our Board of Directors did not notify the Association Members of this zoning variance hearing. If possible, please plan on attending the meeting at 5:30 this evening on the 2nd Floor of City Hall. If you are not available to attend, feel free to email your comments to me and I will read them at the meeting. The City notice is posted below. Thank you, Kathy Stetler 846-5799 City of Carmel Hearing Officer Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Monday, December 17,2007 Time: 5:30 P.M. Place: Carmel City Hall Caucus Room (Second Floor) One Civic Square Carmel, IN 46032 Hearing C@cer: AGENDA: A. Call to Order (5:30 p.m.) B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Reports, AIUlouncements, Legal Counsel Report, and Department Concems D. Public Hearing: 1-2d. Coombes Residence \ The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approvals: Docket No. 07U0004 V Section 25.01.0I.B.3.a.i. Accessory structure located in front of primary structure Docket No. 07110005 V Section 25.01.01.8.1 Height of accessory structure exceeds 18 feet. The site is located at 1815 East 1 09th Street and is zoned S2/Residential. Filed by Engineered Altematives for Todd and Dawn Coombs, owners. 3d. Jay Residence The applicant seeks the tollowing development standards variance approval: Docket No. 071 10021 V Section 25.02.02. Fence in excess of 6 feet in height The site is located at 302 Pintail Court and is zoned S2/Single-family residential. Filed by John Jay, owner. 4d. Floor Crafters - Signage The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval: Docket No. 07110022 V Section 25.07.02-11 Sign not facing right-of-way The site is located at 12345 Old Meridian S1. and is zoned OMIO - Old Meridian Office. Filed by Aaron Wilson, owner. 1. Old Business J. New Business K. Adjournment S:\Board of Zoning AppealsV\gendas\Hearing Officer - 2007'-20071217 Hearing Officerrtf 2