HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact
,/
f
".c
u.
u
'.
CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CARMEL,INDIANA
Docket No.:
~--J7-0V
Kenneth R. Appel & Margaret Appel Winter
Petitioner:
FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE
1. The approval af this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the
community because:
the installation of buffer yard landscaping would interfere with access to
the site to the site. create hardship for adjoining properties for parking
and access. and would create site distance problems
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a
substantially adverse manner because:
the proposed building addition will enhance the property and increase the
value of teh structure on the site.
3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the
use of the property because:
it would eliminate existing access t:o.--.the rear of the site. restrict shared
parking and access with adj aining properties.
DECISION
IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Developmental Standards Variance
Docket No. is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this
Board, which are Incorporated ereln by reference and ma(irt hereof.
-e~thiS day of ~~
CHAIRPERSON, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals /__ -- . -.,
/:;,..
SECRETARY, CarmelfClay Board of Zoning Appeals
Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign).
s :\cannelclayland useregs\checklist\devstanda pp
Revised 10/17/2000
Page e of B - Oevelopmenlal Standards Variance Application
.!-;,,:,i.. .
-e..
u
u
"
CARMEUCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No. :
V-37-02
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Appel & Margaret Appel Winter
FINDINGS OF FACT _ DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE Ballot Sheet
The approval of this variance will mot be injurious to the uhlic health safet
1.
roorals and general welfare of the c~ty becaus~: .
rnp. ;n~r~" ~r; rm nr hllff""r.y~rr1 1 ;:mdsC'.ap' n~ Tin'" r1 1 nterfelre Wl Tn .<'!('('pss to
the site. Create hardship for adjoining properties for parking and access,
and would crp.~tP ~;TP r1i~t.<'!n~~. prob!~
2. The use and value of the area adjacent to rnp. propprTY in"l"r1pr1 ixl tPQ 'lari.:nce
will not be affected in a substantially adverse m~nnpr l-v:>(,.<'l11~e>.
the proposed building addition will enhance the property and increase the
value of the structure on the site.
3. The strict application of the terms of rnp. Zrmi ne; Ordimmce to th~ propffi."ty
will result in practical difficulties in rnp 11~P (")f" tbe propQ.rty boc:ltwc;
it would eliminate access to the reAr of rnp sirp, rp~Trict dQ~ed pJrlcUQg
and access with adioillin?; properties.
DATED THI$
~Jw (olb DAY OF
~~NW
~j ~Q /' f Olt-Vr ftJv
Board Member
~~~
,20
02
Page 7 01 e _ Developmental Standards Variance Application
0- ._r- "', '[ -
~._~.,~ .~'~:~~~~%~~~~l~~"'~
r
u .
-------
u
''\!
:,~~:t,
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No. :
V-37-02
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Appel & Margaret Appel Winter
FINDINGS OF FACT _ DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE Ballot Sheet
'Ihe approval of this variance wlll nut be in. urious to the blic health safet
1.
morals and general welfare of the c~ty becaus~: .
t:np. ; n"r::lll %'l-r; rm nf hllffPr. j'.<:Ird 1 :mds("!'Ip' n~ 'f.-In111..-1 J.nt~rfQ""'Q Wl -rn %'l('CPC::C:: to
the site. Create hardship for adjoining properties for parking and access,
and would crp;:J-rp l=:; -rp (1; c::r,:m("Qprob1'?!!l8
, (,~'. '.~, 1
2. The use and value of the area ad j aCeTIt to tnp propPrty i nc' 1 lr1ed i 1"' th~ y~i.aneo
will not be affected in a substantially arnrersp mm1T1Pr 'hPCo/1'C::P.
the proposed building addition will enhance the property and increase the
value of the structure on the site.
3. The strict application of the terms of t:np. Zlllli,,~ lIr..-1i'n=--i""'ii' to the prOf)0rty
will result in practical difficulties in rnp llC::P ;\"f trn propg:rty OOC.olUf;G:
it would eliminate access to the re8r of -rnp s;rp. rPStriCL ~harGd parking
and access with ad i oi.n:i.nR properties.
~ .
DATED THIS 28~ DAY OF
~
,20
02
Page 7 of 6 _ Developmenlal Standards Variance Application
~. <<ol"'. .~',.~ .'. '..~ ;:(1
.' .' . ,~. ...' \;-
u
u
-
,
CARMEUCLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
Carmel, Indiana
Docket No. :
V-37-02
Petitioner:
Kenneth R. Appel & Margaret Appel Winter
FINDINGS OF FACT _ DEVELOPMENTAL STANDARDS VARIANCE Ballot Sheet
The approval of this variance will mot be injurious to the ublic health safet
1.
rrorals and general w~lfare of the c~ty becauS'e;: .
thE" iT'1~t"~ 11 ~ri ('In ('If nl1ffpr y~rrl 1 ;mrLc:r,qp'T'1~ Tiln,,1 rl 1nt~f@-r<~ 'W1 t"n ::!rce9C: -rQ
the site. Create hardship for adjoining properties for parking and access,
and would CTE"2tp ~i t"P rH c:t<:m~~. .prC?b!~ern.s
2. The use and value of the area adiacent to thp propprt"y iT'1C1"rlpd in t~ ".T~i:lllcC
will not be affected in a substantially adverse m:mnpr 'hPranc;;p,
the proposed building addition will enhance the pro er and increase the
value of the stnlcture on the site.
3. The strict application of the tenTls of the 7.nniT'1g ()rrl;naT'C'~ tQ th') prgpcrty
will result in practical difficulties in t:np 11~p nf fl"'It" prgp€rty 8oc::n.:!f:c:
it would eliminate access to the rear of t:np !'d 1""1"', restri C't l!harml pad:Jng
and access with ad;oin.i.nR properties.
DATED THIS
~
DAY OF
-----
Ma-~fV'L.
----
,20
02
-------R --f ---
Board Member
Page 7 of e _ Developmen\al Standards Variance APplication