HomeMy WebLinkAboutDrainage Report March 2008
u
u
u
U
()
()
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
o
u
u
u
u
U
u
lJ
(j
U
U
U
U
U
U
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
DRAINAGE REPORT
GRANITE CITY
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT 1
CARMEL, INDIANA
MARCH 2008
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
U
u
u
u
o
o
u
u
u
u
U
G
U
U
o
o
o
o
u
u
u
()
o
o
u
u
u
o
u
u
TABLE OF e-ONTENTS
DRAINAGE SUMMARy........................................................................................... ....... .... SECTION 1
RUNOFF & DETENTION CALCULATIONS......... ............................................................ ....... SECTION 2
STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS....................................................................................... SECTION 3
DRAINAGE BASIN MAPS................................... ............................................................... SECTION 4
Woolpert, Inc.
March 2008
Granite City - Carmel, IN
Parkwood West - Outlot #1
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
u
(j
u
u
u
U
LJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
LJ
DRAINAGE SUMMARY
Project Descri ption
This project is the development of Outlot #1 of the overall Parkwood West development plan.
The proposed development is a Granite City restaurant. Three previous drainage plans have
been approved by the City of Carmel for Parkwood West: 1.) the Parkwood West Master Plan
(March 2001), 2.) the Parkwood West Master Plan - Supplement (May 2006), which
incorporated new City of Cannel stonnwater requirements that were introduced after 2001, for
the purpose of approving the construction of Phase 1 (office park development), and 3.)
Parkwood West Phase 2 (Sept 2007). The purpose ofthjs drainage plan is to show the OutIot #1
storm sewer calculations, and that the overall drainage functions as designed in the master plan.
Proposed Conditions
In the 2006 report, the master drainage plan was revised to provide a dual-stage outlet structure
for the previously designed underground detention system to provide restricted release rates for
both 10 and 100-year stonn events. This was modeled with the ICPR3 design software program.
Release rates from the detention system for the 10 and 100-year storm events were 6.40 and 9.08
cfs, respectively, as shown in Table 1.
For the design of the Granite City site, the same seven drainage basins of the overall site were
analyzed. Drainage calculations for Outlot #1 are provided in Section 2 of this report. This site
is part of Basin B6 of the master drainage plan for Parkwood West. Basin B6 was given an
allowable Curve Number of 92. With the proposed Granite City development, the Curve
Number on Outlot #1 is 92. Therefore this development fits within the drainage parameters as
previously designed for. The resulting release rates from the entire Parkwood West
development, which are equal or less than the master plan rates, are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Overall Site Stormwater Release Rates
10-Year 100- Year
Discharge, QIO Discharge, QlOO
Master Drainage Plan (2006) 6.40cfs 9.08 cfs
Current Drainage Plan (2008) 6.37 cfs 9.06 cfs
Also as part of revised stormwater requirements, an Aqua-Swirl AS-8 was proposed ~s part of
the 2006 Master Plan Supplement to provide an adequate stormwater treatment BMP. During
construction the City of Cam1el approved the substitution of the Aqua-Swirl with a Vortechs
7000 BMP unit. With no additional flow from the detention system, this unit will continue to
provide adequate stomnvater treatment for tl1e overall site.
Wool pert, Inc.
March 2008
Granite City - Carmel, IN
Parkwood Wesl- Outlot #1
u
()
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
U
()
U
U
U
U
U
U
The stann sewer for this development was designed for a IO-year stonn event using Indianapolis
IDF curves. Calculations were prepared using HydraFlow Storm Sewer software, and are
included in Section 3 of this report.
Conclusion
The development plan for Outlot # 1- Granite City complies with the original Master Plan for the
overall Parkwood West development. The underground stoffilwater detention system will
release at or below the original designed rate for both 10 and 100-year storm events. No other
deviations from the master drainage plan occur with the proposed development of this project.
Wool pert, Inc,
March 2008
Granite City ~ Carmel, IN
Parkwood West - Outlot #1
coccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
Soil Map-Hamilton County, Indiana. and Marion County, Indiana
57132Q
571390
~
'"
~
'"
571950
'"
~
'"
~
'"
~
'"
'"
N
;;
'"
...
':0;
;;
o
"-
o
:;.:
'"
'"
'"
8
~
'"
'"
M
'"
'"
;;:
...
N
A
50
100
200
200
400
BOO
Feel
1,200
USDA Natural Resources
1iiliiii Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2.0
National Cooperative Sail Survey
3/26/2008
Page 1 of 3
c c c c c c c c c c c c c' c c c c c c c c c c c. c c c c c c c c c. c C c: C C C C C' C (,
Soil Map-Hamilton County, Indiana, and Marion County, Indiana
MAP LEGEND
MAP INFORMATION
Area of Interest (AOII 0) Very Stony Spot
j Area of Interest (AOI) Wet Spot
'f
Soils Other
"'-
f---; Soil Map Units
L_.J
Special Line Features
Special Point Features Gully
W Blowout
Short Steep Slope
[81 Borrow Pit
Other
* Ciay Spot
Political Features
f Closed Depression Municipalities
X. Gravel Pit 0 Cities
.. Gravelly Spot Ii11l Urban Areas
@ Landfill Water Featuri>S
A Lava Flow Oceans
..J.. Marsh ~ Streams and Canals
'.It Mine or Quarry Transportation
Rails
@ Miscellaneous Water
Roads
@J Perennial Waler - Interstate Highways
v Rock Outcrop US Routes
."'"""~~
i' Saline Spot State Highways
Sandy Spot Local Roads
- Severely Eroded Spot Other Roads
(). Sinkhole
~) Slide or Slip
jz( Sadie Spot
5: Spall Area
0 Stony Spot
Original soil survey map sheets were prepared at publication scale.
Viewing scale and prilltillg scale, however. may vary from the
original. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for proper
map measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL: http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov
Coordinate System: UTM Zone 16N
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of
the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Area Data:
Soil Survey Area:
Survey Area Data:
Hamilton County, Indiana
Version 6, Sep 4, 2007
Marion County, Indiana
Version 8, Sep 4, 2007
Your area of interest (ADI) includes more than one soil survey area.
These survey areas may have been mapped al different scales, with
a different land use in milld, at different times~ or at different ievels
of detaii. This may result in map unit symbols. soil properties, and
interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area
boulldaries.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: 1998
The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digiliz:ed probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting
of map unit boundaries may be evident.
USDA
".~
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2.0
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/26/2008
Page 2 of 3
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Soil Map-Hamilton County, indiana, and Marion County, Indiana
Map Unit Legend
CrA
MmB2
Totals for Area of Interest (AOI)
I Brookslon silty clay loam I
Crosby sill loam, 0 to 3 percent I
slopes
Miami silt loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, eroded
r Miami sill loam, 2 to 6 percent
slopes, eroded
37.4
100,0% I
USDA
~
Natural Resources
Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey 2,0
National Cooperative Soil Survey
3/26/2008
Page 3 of 3
C Ci C C C C C' C C C C C' C C C C' C C C C C: C' C C C C C C C C C C C, C C C C' c. C C C C C
L
<t,
i5
c:
w
::ii
1]
o
ONE X
City of Carmel
180081
..J
..J
~
~
z
15:
CL-
UJ
ZONE X
~ ...J
Z UJ
:=J :2
0 a:
() <(
U
Z W-
0
I- 0
...J
:2 f::
<I: U
I
.-
7~(L\L\,Joo0
yJ~'
W 96TH 5T
--
- .....
\
6 tfv.J ,+f
C .+1
Sin
COUNTY BOUNDARY
APPROXIMATE SCALE
500 0
I---l I---'-l I---l
500 FEET
I
NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM
FIRM
flOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
HAMIL TON COUNTY,
INDIANA
AND INCORPORATED AREAS
PANEL 216 OF 290
{S~E MAP IND8< FOR P..o.NELS NOT PAINTEDl
CONT ,IoJNS:
COMMUNITY
C4RM:El... elT'!' OF
i-tMfll1ON COONf"f
NUMBER PANEL SUFFIX
l8QQtl1 O1".e
180050 01'6
"I1J.1kc to tlser: The MAP f>jUM!lEFt shown bGIoI.... !nould be U90d
'IolItIen ~ling -rr,ap ordws.: the COMMU:NFTY NUl\iIIfl.EFI ~
'liWw ~d till 1.1~ -r,;n inWRDlQll l:~lllg1km1- Tw Il1lJ lubJwt;
.eel\'ln'lUl'Jity.
MAP NUMBER
18057C0216F
EffECTIVE DATE:
FEBRUARY 19, 2003
Federal Emergency Management Agency
This is an official copy of a portion of the abo\'e referenced flood map. It
was extracted u6ing F-MIT On-Line. This map does not reflect changes
or amendments. which may have been made subsequent to the date on the
title block. For the late.t product ic,formation about National Flood Insurance
Program 1Iood maps check tha FEMA Flood Map Store at Ww'VW.msc.fema.gQv
u
u
u
u
o
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
U
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
RUNOFF & DETENTION
CALCULATIONS
Woolpert, Inc,
March 2008
Granite City - Carmel, IN
Parkwood West - Outlot #1
CCCCCCCCCCCCCGCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Project:
Location:
Prepared by:
Date:
GRANITE CITY PARKWOOD WEST
Carmel, IN
gsb
1/3/2008
Basin EXISTING OUTLOT 1
2.0413 Area or %
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
0.1113
1.93
o
Basin EXISTING OUTLOT 1
2.0413 Area or %
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Total:
0.1113
1.93
o
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
UseC:
CN
98
67.5
98
Use CN:
TOTAL C VALUE
2.2538 Area or %
0.1113
2.1425
TOTAL:
USE TOTAL C:
TOTAL C VALUE
2.2538 Area or %
0.1113
2.1425
TOTAL:
USE TOTAL CN:
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
C
98
67.5
98
t~1:~~~~~~~~~
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCGCCCCCOCCCCCCCCCCC
Basin EXISTING OUTLOT 2
0.2125 Area or %
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
o
0.2125
o
Total:
Basin EXISTING OUTLOT 2
0.2125
Area or %
o
0.2125
o
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Total:
C
0.85
025
0.9
UseC:
CN
98
67.5
98
Use CN:
u
u
U Project: Granite City - Parkwood West
U Location: Carmel,IN
U Prepared by: gsb
U Date: 1/3/2008
() Total
U Area or % CN
Pavement 1.6327 98
U Grass 0.442 67
(j Rooftop 0.15 98
U
LJ
U Total:
U Use CN:
U Basin G-1
U Area or % CN
U Pavement 0.1663 98
- Grass 0.0472 67
U Rooftop 0 98
U
U
U Total:
U
U Use eN:
U Basin G-2
U Area or % eN
U Pavement 0.11 98
Grass 0.06 67
U Roofto 0 98
U
U
() Total:
U
U
U Basin G-3
() Area or % CN
Pavement 0.149 98
U Grass 0.0195 67
(J Rooftop 0.05 98
U
U
U Total;
U Use CN:
U
U
U
U
lJ
()
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
LJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
o
u
u
u
u
u
(j
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Basin G-4
Basin G-5
Basin G-6
Basin G-7
Area or %
0.21
0.03
o
Total:
Area or %
0.19
0.0138
0.1
Area Of %
0.0874
0.011
o
T t I 1'''''''''l\'~ii''''8'A~,''j>1
o a ::i1~:9:};l:!p,,~ijjl*
Area or %
0,16
0.03
o
Total:
Use CN:
Use CN:
Use CN:
Use CN:
CN
98
67
98
CN
98
67
98
eN
98
67
98
CN
98
67
98
lilgWo'F1' iJ:;i6'9tWY'1
""C'""" ct.,.. ","IF
.;..,.b;,="::1-.;-;....'4>.'_.o.._.._:c.<.'.:i-.;;~,,:;
u
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
(j
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
U
U
U
u
V
o
U
()
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Basin G-8
Basin G-9
Basin G-10
Basin G-11
Total:
Total:
Total:
Area or % CN
0.13 98
0.0034 67
o 98
Use CN:
Area or % CN
0.06 98
0.04 67
o 98
Area or % eN
0.04 98
0.0411 67
o 98
Use eN:
Area or % eN
0.04 98
0.0017 67
o 98
Tota I" li'['\\'i~~0i '0Q,'A\il:i':i'zr"l
.f'twiiJ... .~_~t!<I.:~b;,"",
Use eN:
u
u
U
lJ
U
U
U
U
U
LJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
v
u
u
u
u
U
LJ
()
U
()
U
U
U
U
lJ
U
(j
U
U
U
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Basin G-12
Basin G-13
Basin 8-14
Total:
Total:
Total:
Area or % CN
0.06 98
o 67
o 98
Area or % CN
0.06 98
o 67
o 98
Area or % CN
0.17 98
0.1443 67
o 98
Use CN:
c c c c c c c' c c C' c (, c c c c C c/ C C' C (: C C' C C'; (' C c. c' c' c c c c c c c c c c C', c
PROPOSED CONDITIONS- 10 YE.".R 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Ma.x Time ~lax I'larning Max Delta ~lax Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max
Name Grcup Simulation Stage Stage Stage Stage Area Inflo., Inflow Outflow Outflo'"
hrs f1c f1c ft f1c2 hrs cfs hrs cfs
OUT BASIl 10YR24HR 10.01 321.000 324.000 0.0017 0 12.84 6.374 0.00 0.000.
PONDA BJI_SE 10YR24HR 14.62 829.877 833.000 0.0048 16186 12.00 2 5 . ill 15.30 0.779
OGDETEN1 BASE 10YR24HR 12.84 826.079 830.000 0.0050 13459 12.01 33 . 861 12.84 6.314
OGDETEN2 BASE 10YR24HR 12.82 826.089 830.000 0.0050 5437 12.00 23 . 594 15.31 34.219
UGDETEN3 BI\S8 10YR:<4HR 12.84 B26.019 830.000 0.0050 8631 12.00 30 .212 12.02 13 .122
/ () '-f E.4 e.
12.g~ E- -:::: fR. 3 7 c.F";5
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
Interconnected ChmmeI and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) lQ2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 1 of 1
c' c c c C c\ C C' C C c' c' c c c c c' c. c c ee' C C C CI C C C C~ C C C c' c c C' C' C C C C C
PROPOSED CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24.HOUR
INPUT REPORT
==== Basins ==========================================:=~==================~==============
Na.me; B1
Group, BASE
Uni" Hydrograph, llh484
Raj.nfall File: Scsii-24
Rainfall ,':l.mount{in): 4080
Are",,,c), 2.080
Curve Number, 89.00
DCIA(%), 0.00
Name, B2
Group, BASE
unit Hydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File: Scsii-24
R,unfalJ. AmOllTIt [.in) , <\.080
Area [ac}, 2.940
Curve Number: 8'9.00
DCIA(%}' 0.00
Name: B3
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograpn, Uh4S4
Rainfall File: Scsli-24
Rainfall Amount (in): 4..0 SO
Area (ae) , 5.400
Curve Number, 92.00
DCIA[%), 0.00
Name, 84
GrOlip: BASE
Unit Hydrograph:
Rainfall File:
Raincall Amount (in) .
Area (ac)
Curve Number:
DCIA(%J,
Uh484
Scsii-24
4.080
1.950
92.00
0.00
Name: 85
Status: Onsite
Node, UGDETE/a
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Peaking Factor, 484.0
Storm Duration (hrsJ, 24.00
Time of Cone (minJ : 14.00
Time Shift (hrsl , 0.00
[.Iax !\.llowable Q (cfsl: 999999.000
Node: UGDETEN3
Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status: Onsite
Peaking Factor,
Storm Duration(hrs)
Time of Cone (min) ;
Time Shift (hrsl
Max Allowable Q(cfs),
484.0
24.00
16.00
0.00
999999.000
Node, UGDETEN3
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status, Onsite
peaking FactDr, 4.84.0
Storm Duration (hrs) , 24.00
Time of Cone (min) : 10.50
Time Shift (hrs) : 0,00
Max Allowable Q [cEs): 999999.000
Node, UGDETEN2
T}~e: SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status: Onsite
Peaking Factor,
Storm Duration (hrs) ,
Time of Conc(min),
Time Shift (hrs)
Max Allowable Q (cfs) ,
484.0
24.00
9.00
0.00
999999,000
Node, UGDET3lJ2
Status: Onsite
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
Page 1 of7
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
c C' C c' c C~ c c (, c C' CI C C, C C (, c. c C' C (. (. C, C CI, C C C C C C C C C C C' C C C C C C'
PROPOSED CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HOUR
lNPUT REPORT
Group, BASE
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Unit Hydrograph, Uh4B4
Rainfall File, 8c5ii-24
Rain.f.all Amount (in) , 4.080
Arca(ac), 3,920
Curve Number~ 90.00
DCIA(1o) , 0.00
Name, B6
Group, BASE
Unit Hydrograph,
Rainfall File,
Rainfall Amount (in)
Area(ac) ,
Curve Number;
DCL!\(%) ,
Uh484
Scsii-24
4,080
6.530
92.00
0.00
Name, OFF8ITE
Group: BASE
Unit Hydrograph, TJh484
Rainfall File, Scsii-24
Rainfall Amount (in) , 2 640
Area (ac) , 2.370
Curve Number, Ge.oo
DCIA(%l, 0.00
peaking Factor, 484.0
Storm Duration (hr5) , 24.00
Time of Cone (min) , 11.00
Time Shift (hrs) , 0,00
Max Allowable Q(cfs), 999999.000
Node, PONDA
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status: onsite
Peaking Factor:
Storm Duration (hrs) ,
Time. of Conc(min),
Time Shift (hrs) ,
Max Allowable Q(efs) ,
484.0
24.00
1l.00
0.00
999999.000
Node, UGDETEN2
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status, Onsite
Peaking Factor: 484.0
Storm Durati.on (hrs) , 24.00
Time of Cone (min) , 25.00
Time Shift (hrs) , 0.00
Max Allowable Q(c[s): 999999.000
-----------------------------------------------------------------~------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------~~~-------------------------------
~~=~ Nodes ~~~~~~~~~=======~~==~~~~~~~=~============~===~===~=======~===================~~
-----------~------------------------------------------------~-~~--------------------------
---~-~~-------------------------------------------------~~--------------------------------
Init Stage(ft), 820,000
Warn Stage 1ft) , 824,000
Nome, OUT
Group, 81'-8E
Type, Time/Stage
Base Flow(efs), 0.000
Time {hrs I
Stage(ftl
0.00
5,00
10,00
20.00
30 00
40.00
820.000
820.500
821.000
321.000
820.500
820.000
Init Stage(ft) 826.000
Hame, PONDA
Ease Flow[cfs)' 0.000
PARKWOOU WEST - OUTLOT fcl
1/03/08
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) {g2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 20f7
c c c c c c c' c c' C C' (I C C C C (, C'C C (C' C CI C Cl CC C C C' C C C' C C' C'C, C C C C C
PROPOS8D CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPDRT
Group' BASE: Narn Stage (ftl: 833,000
Type, Stage/Area
Stag.(Et) Area(ac)
826.000
827.000
828.000
829.000
830.000
B31.000
832,000
B33,000
Name: UGDETEN1
Group: BASE
Type: S,age!Area
Sta9E! (ft l
821. 500
825,000
a2a,500
o . 2323
0.2660
o .3020
0.3400
o . 3760
0.4152
0.4.557
0,4975
Ease Flow (efs): 0.000
Init Stage[ft): 821.520
warn Stage[ft}: 830.000
Area lac)
0,0100
0,0100
0.0100
Name: UGDETEN2
Group: BASE
Type: Manhole, Flat Floor
Base F10'.dcfs): 0.000
Plunge Paetor: 1.00
Init Stage 1ft): 822,410
Warn Stage lEt) : 830,000
Stage(ft)
822.210
829.240
Area (ac I
0.0100
0.0100
Base FlO\<\cfsl' 0.000
Plunge Factor, 1 00
lnit Stage[ft): 822.170
Narn Stage [ft), 830.000
Name: UGDETEN3
Group' BASE
Type: Manhole, Flat Floor
Scage(Et) Area(ac)
822.170 0.0100
829 170 0.0100
Name; L2
==== Pipes ================================~======~==~~=~~~~~:~~=~=:~~====================
Length(ftl: 1436.00
From Node: UGDETEN2
PARKWOOD '"rEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/03
Page 3 of7
111tercOlUlected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies: Inc.
c c c' c c c c. c c (' c c c' c c c c~' C' c\ C C C C C c' c c c: c' c c c c C C Ci C\ C C. C C C C
PROPOSED CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Group: BASE
UPSTREAM
Geometry: Circular
Span[in) , 84,00
Rise [inl, 84. 00
Invert [ftl, 822,240
Ma.nning's N, O,OUOOO
Top Clip [in), 0,000
Bot Clip [inl , 0,000
To Node, UGDETENl
DOWNSTREAM
Circular
84. 00
84 00
822,24.0
0.013000
0,000
0.000
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description,
Ci rcular Concrete, Squa.re edge wi headwall
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Cone.rete: Sq\l"Te edge wi headwall
Name, L4
Group: BASE
Geometry,
Span (in) ,
Rise (in) ,
Invert lEt} ,
Manning I sN :
Top Clip I in)
Bot Cl ip I in)
UPSTREAl'!
Circular
84,00
84,00
822.170
0.013000
0,000
0.000
From Node, UGDETEN3
To Node, UGDETENl
DONNSTREAN
Circular
84.00
84.00
821,500
o 013000
0,000
0.000
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description,
Circular CMP, Headwall
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular CMP, Headwall
COlJnL' 1
Friction Equation: Average Conveyance
Solution Algorithm, Automatic
Flow, Both
Entrance Loss Coef: 0.50
Exit Loss Coef, 0.00
Bend Loss Coef, 0.00
Outlet Ctrl Spec, Use dc or tw
Inlet Ctrl Spec, Use dn
Stabilizer Option, None
Length 1ft) , 2383.00
Count, 1
Friction Equation: Average Conveyance
Solution Algorithm, Automatic
Fla'"" Iloth
Entrance Loss Coet, 0,50
Exit Loss Coet, 0,00
Bend Loes Coet, 0,00
Outlet Ctrl Spec, Use dc or tw
Inlet Ctrl Spec: Use dn
Stablllzer Option, None
==== Drop St.ructures ========================================~=~============~===~~==~~=~=~
Name, Ll
Group, BASE
Geometry:
Span [in) ,
Rise(inJ:
Invert (ft] ,
Manning I s N;
Top Clip [b) ,
UPS'I'REAM
Circulal.
15,00
15.00
821,500
0,012000
0.000
From Node, UGDETENl
To NOde, OUT
DOWNSTREAM
Ci.rcular
15 00
15,00
821,000
0.012000
0,000
Length [ft}, 170.00
Count: 1
Friction Equation:
Solution Algorithm,
Flow,
CoeE,
CoeE,
Spec,
Spec,
Average Conveyance
Automatic
Both
0,000
0.750
Use dc or tw
Use dn
Entrance
Exit
Outlet
Inlet
Loss
Loss
Ctrl
Ctrl
PARKWOOD WEST - Ol~LOT #1
1/03/03
Interconnected Cham1el and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) (92002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 4 of7
c c c. c c C c\ C C cc C' c. c' c c. C ( (I C C' c. c c: C C c\ (' C C C c' C' c c C c\ c e, C c' c' c
PROPOSBD CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Bot Clip (in), 0.000
0.000
Solution Incs, 10
Up"trecLm FHN." Inlet Bdge DeGcription,
Circular Concrete: Squa.re edge wI headwall
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge De.scription:
Ci~cular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall
'*'lr ~. Neir 1 of far DI:op StI:ucture L1 io**
Count, 1
Type' VeI:tical, Mavis
Flo., , Both
Geometry, Circular
Span (in) , 6.00
Rise(in) , 6.00
,H Tl'Jeir 2 oE 2 fOI: Drop Structure Ll *H
Count; 1
Type, Veri:.ical: Mavis
Flow: Beth
Geometry' Circular
Span(in) , 11_ 50
Rise i in) , 11. 50
TABLE
Bottom Clip (:i.n) , 0.000
Top Clip(in}' 0.000
.eir Disc Coef, 3_200
Orifice Disc Coef, 0_600
InveI:t(ft), 821.500
Control Elev(ft) 821.500
TABLE
Bottom Clip(in) , 0_000
Top Cllp (in), 0 _ 000
weir Disc Coef: 3.200
Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600
Invert (ft), 822.250
Control E1ev(ft), 822 _250
Name, L3
Group, BASE
From Node: PONDA
To Node, UGDETBN2
[,ength (ft), 72,00
COllnt: 1
UPSTRBA'I DOTAlNSTREAM Friction Equation, Avel'age ConveY~T1ce
Geometry: CiI:cular Circular Solution Algorithm, Automatic
Span (in) , 12.00 12.00 Flow, Both
Rise {in] : 12.00 12,00 Entrance Loss Coef, 0_500
Invert (ft) , 825_950 825.500 EXlt Loss Coef, 0_000
Manningls N, 0_013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec, Use de or tw
Top Clip lin! , 0_000 0_000 Inlet Ctrl Spec, Use dn
Bot Clip (in! , 0_000 0_000 Solution lIles, 10
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Concrete~ squ~re edge wi headwall
Downstream Fm,A Inlet Edge Descript ion:
Circular Concrete, Square edge wi headwall
k l--k Wei.-c 1 of 2 Eor DrOp 8::::ructure [;3 *'1';'*
Count, 1
Type, Vertical, Mavis
Flow, Both
Geometry: Ci~cular
TABLE
Bottom Clip(in), 0_000
Top Clip(in) , 0.000
NeiI: Disc Coef, 3_200
Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600
PARKWOOD NEST - OUTLOT #1_
1/03/06
Page 5 of7
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
c c' (; c, C ( ('I C,) (. C' C (' C c' c c c c. c c c c c c c C (\ C C C c' c. c c ( C (. c' ( c .c c c
PROPOSED CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Span (inl 4.00 Invert(ft/, 826.000
Rise (inl , 4.00 Control Elev(ft/ , 826,000
"",-j, Weir 2 of 2 for Drop Structure L3 'H
TABLE
Count, 1 Bottom Clip (in) 0.000
Type, Horizontal Top Clip(tn), 0.000
Flo1~.:; Both weir Disc Coef: 3.200
Geometry, Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600
Span (in) , 2.00 Invert (ft) 831.970
Rise (in) , 2.00 Control Elev(ft) 831.970
==~-=-~~==========================================================~===~=~==~========~~~~=~
==== Hyd~alogy Simulations ======~==========~===~=~~======================================
Name; lDYR24HR
Filena.me, G, \SD\proj ects \67 844-Grani te City Parkwood West \ENG\Detent ion\10YR24RR. R32
Override Defaults: No
Tlme(hrsJ Print Inc(min/
30.000 5.00
==== RO'ilt ing Si m1.1la t ions =-==========-=-=""==:::::::===:;:::::::=====================::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=::::=
-------~-----------------------~~--------------------------------~---~--~------~--~-------
------------------------------------------~--------~--~-----------------------------------
Name, lOYR24HR Hydrology Slm' 10YR24HR
Pilename, G,\SD\Projects\67944-Granite City Parkwood West\ENG\Detention\10YR24RR.I32
EXeCUl..E: Yes
Alternative, No
Restart, No
Patch: No
r~ax Delta Z (ftJ ,
Time Step Dptimizer,
Start Time (hrs) ,
Min Calc Time (sec) ,
Boundary Stages:
1. 00
10.000
0.000
0.5000
Delta Z Factor, 0.00500
End Time (hrs) , 30.00
Max Calc Time (secl , 60.0000
Boundary Plows,
Time lhrs) print Ine (mini
30.000 5.000
Group Run
BASE
Yes
=::::==- Bou:ndary COIldi tions ===""~=_"1::;;:;~"=='==;:::-':':""""=====~='============'========:=.::===============
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/0 a
Intercollnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ll,J2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 6 of7
c c' c~ c c c c c c c (: (, (\ C' C C C Cl C C (\ C Ice C C C\ C. (\ C C' c: c~ C. c~ C c\ C. C" C C c: C' ,
PRO~OSED CONDITIONS- 10 YEAR 24 HDUR
INPUT REPORT
PI\RKl-IOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) ct>2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 7 of!
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 10 G YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Max Time Max Warning r-1ax Delta Max Surf Max Time Max Max Time Max
Num€ Group Simulation stage St~ge Stage Stage Area Inflow Inflow Outflow Outflow
hrs Et ft ft ft2 hrs cfs hrs cfs
OUT BASE HlOYR24HR 10 .00 821.000 824.000 0.0017 0 12.87 9.062 0 ,00 0.000
PDNDA BASE 100YR?.4HR 16 ,38 831.835 8,3.000 -
0.0050 19648 12.00 39.562 17 ,83 0.979
UGDETENl BASE 100YR24HR 12 ,37 829.769 830.000 0.0073 1104 12.00 51.967 12 ,87 9.062
UGDE'fEN2 Bl\SE 100YR24HR 12 .38 829.772 830.000 -0.0080 687 12.00 37.305 20 ,05 39.27~
UGDETEN3 BASE 100YR24HR 12 38 829.770 830.000 0.0050 853 12.00 ~7.208 11. 99 19.721
1C't> '-(641Z. ~~:B
~ 1. ~ c.f.5
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT *1
1/0'/08
Intcrcoilllcclcd Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 192002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 1 of 1
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
~~~~~~~~~~===========================~~~~~~=====~======================:~=~==~============
==== Basins ======~===========:============~~=======~====~================================
Name: B1
Group ~ BASE
~~=~~~~=============~~~~~======================================================~==========
Unlt Hydr09yaph, Uh484
Rainfall File, Scsii-24
Rainfall Amount (in) , 6.000
Area(ac), 2.080
Curve Number, 89.00
DeIA (%), 0.00
Name: B2
GrDup: BJ'o,SF.
Unit Hydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File, Scsii-24
Rainfall Amount!in) , 6.000
Area (ac), 2.940
Curve Number, 89.00
DCIA(%), 0.00
Name, B)
Group, B.>>'SE
U~it Hydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File, Sesii-24
Rainfall A;nount(in) , 6.000
Area (ac) , 5,400
Curve Nurr~er: 92.00
DClfl(l.-): O.uo
Name: B4
Group: B.>>'SE
Unit Ilydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File, Scsii-24
Rainfall A;nount(in): 6.000
Area (ac) : 1.950
Cu:r've Number: 92.00
DCIA(.), 0 00
Ncde: UGDETEN'l
Type: SCS Unit Hydrcsra.ph
Status: Onsite
Peaking Factor, 484.0
storm Duration (hrs) , 24.00
Time of Conc (min) , 14.00
Time Shift (hrs) , 0.00
Max Allowable Q(cEs), 999999.000
Node: UGDETEN3
Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status.: Onsite
Peaking Fac"or, 484.0
Storm Duration [hrs) , 24.00
Time oE Cone [min) , 16.00
Time ShiEt[hrs), 0.00
Max Allowable Q[eEs), 999999.000
Node, UGDETEN3
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status; Onsit.e
Peaking Factor: 484 0
Storm Duration(hrs), 21.00
Tlme oE Conc(min), 10.50
Time Shift[hrs), 0,00
Max Allowable Q [eEs), 999999.000
Node, UGDETEN2
Type, SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status, Onsite
Peaking Factor: 484.0
Storm Duration (hrs) : 21.00
Time of Conc(min): 9,00
Time Shift (hrs) : 0 00
r']ax Allowable Q (cfs) , 999999.000
Name: B5 Node, UGDETEN2 Status, Onsite
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
IntercOlmected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Teclmologies, Inc.
Page 1 of7
ccccccccccccccccccccccccocccccccccccccccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Group' BASE
Type, ses unit Hydrograph
Unit Hydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File, Scsii-24
Rainfall Amount (in) , 6.000
Area lac) , 3.920
Curve Number, 90.00
DClA[%'), 0.00
Name, BS
Group, BASE
Unit Hydrograph, Uh484
Rainfall File: Scsii-24
Rainfall Amount(in): 6.000
Area (ac) , 6.530
C'Jrve Number, 92.00
DeIA [%): 0 00
Name, On'SITE
Group: BASE
unit. Hydrograph, llh484
Rainfall E'iIe = Scsii.-?,4
Rainfall Amount ( in): 4.080
twea (ac): 2.370
Curve Nurnbe.r = 68 _ 00
DClA[..): 0.00
Peaking .Pactor= 484 0
Storm Duration (hr,s): 24.00
Time of eonc(min), 11.00
Time Shift[hrs), 0.00
Max Allowable Q [cU:): 999999.000
Node, PONDA
Type, ses Unit Hydrograph
Status, Onsite
Peaking Factor: 484.0
Storm Duration (hrs) , 24.00
Tim" of eonc(rnin), 11.00
Time Shift (hrs): 0 00
Max Allowable Q(cfsl: 999999.000
Node, UGDETEN2
Type: SCS Unit Hydrograph
Status' Onsite
Peaking Factor: 484.0
Storm Duration (hrs) , 24.00
Time of Conc(min), 25.00
Time Shift [hr,s): 0.00
Max Allowable Q(cEs): 999999.000
--------~---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------~----~-------------------~-~-----------------
~=== Nodes ===========================~~~~~~-~~=--=_~~~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=====~=~~
Name = OUT
Group = Bi\SE
Type, Time/Stage
Base Flow (cfs) , 0.000
lnit Stage[ftf, 820.000
Warn Stage[ftf, 824.000
Time [h>:o';)
Stage (ftc)
0.00
5.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
820.000
820.500
821.000
821.000
820.500
820.000
Name, PONDA
Base Flow(cfs), 0.000
Init Stage[ft), 826.000
P.~KWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
Page 2 of7
Interconnected Chamlel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) '~2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Group, BASE Warn Stage(ft), 833.000
Type: Stage/Area
Stage(ft) Area(ac)
826.000
827.000
828.000
829.000
830.000
831. 000
832.000
833.000
Name, UGDETENl
Group: BASE
Type, Stage/Area
Stage(ft)
821.500
825.000
828.500
0.2323
0.2660
0.3020
0.3400
0.3760
0.4152
0.4557
o .4975
Ba.se Plow[efs] 0.000
Init Stage(ft] 821.520
Warn Stage(ft] 830.000
Area(ao)
0.0100
0.0100
0.0100
Ease now [efs]: 0.000
Plunge Factor: 1.00
Name, UGDETEN2
Group, EASE
T}Te: Manhole, Flat Floor
Init Stage (ft}, 822.410
Warn Stage (ft): 830.000
Stage(ft) Area(ac)
822.240 0.0100
829.240 0.0100
Ease now[efs], 0.000
Plunge Factor: 1.00
Name: UGDETEN3
Group, BASE
Type: Manhole, Flat Floor
Stage (ft)
822.170
829.170
I:ni.t Stage (ft), 822.170
WaTn Stage (ft): 830.000
Area (ac)
0.0100
0.0100
Name: L2
==== P:LpCS =====~~:=~==============================================================~~=~~~=
Length (ft) 14036.00
From Node: UGDETEN2
PARKWOOD WEST - OUTLOT #1
1/03/08
Page 3 of7
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) 192002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
~ROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
GroClp, BASE
UPSTREAM
Geometry: Circular
Span (in!, 84.00
Rise (in!, 84.00
In':ert (ft!: 822,240
Manniag's N: 0.013000
TOp Clip(in) , 0.000
Bot Clip(in) , 0,000
TO Node, UGDETENl
DOWNSTREAN
Circular
84 00
84 ,00
822,240
0.013000
0,000
0.000
Upstr~am FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Cicculac Concrete, Square edge wi headwall
Downstream FHl-IA Inlet Edge Description,
Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall
Name: L4
Group' BASE
UPSTREAM
Geometry: Circular
Span (in): 84,00
Rise (in): 84.00
Invert (ft), 822,170
Nanning'S N, 0,013000
Top Clip (In): 0,000
Bot Clip [in): 0,000
From Node: UGDETEN3
To Node: UGDETENl
DOWNSTREAM
Circular
84.00
84.00
821.500
0.013000
0,000
0,000
Upstream FHi"U\ Inlet F.:dge Description:
Circular CMP: Headwall
Downstream FH~~A Inlet Bclge Description:
Circular CMP: Headwall
Count: 1
Friction Equation; Average Conveyance
Solution Algorithm: Automatic
Flow: Both
Entrance Loss CoeE: 0.50
Exit Loss Coe.E: 0,00
Bend Loss CceE: 0,00
Outlet Ctrl Spec, Use dc or tw
Inlet Ctrl Spec, Use dn
Stabili,zer Option: None
Length (Et)
Count;
Friction Equation,
Solution Algorithm:
Flow,
Entrance Loss Coef:
Exit Loss Coef:
Bend Loss Coef:
Outlet Ctrl Spec:
Inlet Ctrl Spec:
Stabilizer Option:
<383,00
1
Average Conveyance
Automatic
Both
0,50
0,00
0.00
Use dc or tw
Use dn
None
====='==================~~===~~~==========:======~=========================================
=== = Drop St_ rl1ctl1TE:r:; ========= =========_==_=================================.,,""= =======:;.:::::::=
Name: Ll
Group' BASE
=======~==~=================~~=======================================~~:==================
Length [ftJ 170.00
Count:
UPSTREAM
Geometry' Circular
Span (in): 15,00
Rise(in): 15,00
Invert (Et): 821,500
Mann1ng's N, 0.012000
rop Clip(in): 0,000
From Node: UGDETEN1
TO Node: OUT
DO~INSTREAM
Circular
15.00
15_00
821.000
0,012000
0,000
PARK'/WOD WEST - OUTLOT U1
1/03/08
Friction Equation~
solution Algorithm'
Flow:
Caef:
Coef:
Spec:
Spec,
Average Conveyance
lwtomatic
Both
0.000
0,750
Use de or tw
Use an
Entrance
Exit
Outlet
Inlet
Loss
Loss
Ctrl
Ctrl
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) cf)2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc,
Page 4 of7
ccccccccccccccocccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24. HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Rot Clip (in). 0.000
0.000
Solution Incs; 10
UpstL.eam FIP.A Inlet Edge D",scription:
Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall
Downstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description:
Circular Chlcrete: Square edge wi headwall
*** Vleir cf 2 for Drop Structure Ll ...
C011nt: 1
Type: Vextical: [l.1avi:::;
Flow: Both
Geometry: Circular
Span (in) ll.50
Rise (in) 1l.50
... l1eir 2 of for Drop Structure Ll H<
Count :. 1
Type: VeTtical: Mavis
Flm,,: Both
Geometry: Circular
Span (in) : 6.00
Rise (in) : 6.00
TI'.BLE
Bottom Clip (in): 0.000
Top Clip(in): 0.000
Weir Disc Coef: 3.200
OriEice Disc Coef: 0.600
Invert (ft): 822.250
Control Elevlft), 822.250
T-'\BLE
Bottom Clip(ln): 0.000
Top Clip(in) , 0.000
l1eir Disc Coef: 3.200
Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600
Invert (ft), 821.500
Control Elev(ft), 821.500
-------~--------~----------------------------------------------~------------------------------~-----
Name: L3 From Nod".: PONDA Lengi:h [ft) , 72.00
Group: BASE To Node: UGDETEN2 Ccunt: 1
UPSTREAM DOWNSTREAM Friction Equation: Average Conveyance
Geometry: Circular. Circular solution Algorithm: Automatic
Span (in) , 12.00 12.00 Flow, Both
Rise (in) : 12.00 12.00 Entrance Loss Coef, 0.500
Invert (ft) , 825.950 825 500 Exit Less Co".f, 0.000
Manning t,g N: 0.013000 0.013000 Outlet Ctrl Spec, Use dc or tw
TOp Clip (in) 0.000 0.000 Inlet Ctrl Spec, Use dn
Bot Clip (in) 0.000 0.000 Solution Ines: lO
Upstream FHWA Inlet Edge Description,
Circular Concrete: Square edge wi headwall
Downstn'ilm FH'"A Inlet Edge Description,
Circular Concrete, Square edge wi headwall
*"'* Weir 1 of 2 for Drop Structure L3 ***
Count, 1
Type: Vertical: Mavis
Flew, Both
Geometry: Circular
TABLE
Bot.tom Cll.p (in), 0.000
Top C1.lp (in). 0.000
Weir DlSC Coef: 3.200
Orifice Disc Coef: 0.600
P~RKWOOD WEST - Ou~LOT #1
1/03/08
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) (92002 Streamline Teclmologies, Inc.
Page 5 of7
c C' c:, C C C c: C' C' C C c' c c c c c c' c c c. c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c' c c c, c c c
PROPOSED CO~~ITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
Span (in) : 4.00 Invert 1ft! : 826.000
Rise(in): 4.00 Control Illev(ft! : 826.000
*H Weir oE cor. Deop Structure L3 *""*'
TABLE
Count: 1 B:)ttom Clip [in) : 0.000
Type: Horizontal TOp Clip [in) : 0.000
I'l:)w; Both Weir Disc Coef ~ 3.200
Geometry; Rectangular Orifice Disc Coef ~ 0.500
Span (in) 2.00 Invert (ft) : 831.970
F.ise(in) . 2.00 Control Elev(ft) : 831.970
==== Hydrology Simulations ===============================================================
~~-----------------------~------------------~-~----------------------------------------~-~
---------------------------------------~--~-----------------------------------------------
Name: 100YR24HR
Filename: G:\SD\Projects\67844-Granite City parkwood West\ENG\Oetention\100YR24HR.R32
Override Defaults; No
Time (llL'S /
Print Inc(min)
30 000
5.00
~=~= Routing Simulations =========~~=~~=~=~==:=~=~========================================
----------------~------~---------------------------~--------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------~-~--------------------
Name; 100YR21HR Hydrology Sim: 100YR24HR .
Filename; G, \SD\Proj ect s\67844 -GraIllte Ci ty Parkwood West \ENG\Detention\100YR24HR. I32
Execute: Yes
^lternative: No
Restart: No
Patch: No
Max Delta Z(ft)
Time Step Optimizer:
Start Time (hrs} ;
Mia Calc Time(sec~
Boundary Stages:
1. 00
10.000
0.000
0.5000
Delta Z FactOr: 0.00500
End Time (hrs) , 30.00
Max Calc Time(sec): 60.0000
Boundary Flo."s,
Timelhrsl Print Inc(min)
30.000 5.000
Group Run
EASE
Yes
==== Bcundary Conditions .~~~~============================================================
-----~------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------~--------~--~---------------------------------
PA"KWOOD WEST - OUTLOT >>1
1/03/03
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) @2002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 6 of7
cccccccoocccccccccccccccccccccccocccocccccc
PROPOSED CONDITIONS - 100 YEAR 24 HOUR
INPUT REPORT
PARK'tlOOD 112:8T - OUTLOT III
1/03/08
Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing Model (ICPR) \92002 Streamline Technologies, Inc.
Page 7 0[7
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
( ,
u
U
U
U
U
()
U
U
U
U
U
o
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
(j
u
u
u
u
u
STORM SEWER CALCULATIONS
Woofpert, Inc.
March 2008
Granite City - Carmel, IN
Parkwood West - Outlot #1
t
o
IN\" N f:!U.:J$ 1
INV ( B26.5.S
~
II I I
I h I II I
I I I
~ ~ Ii I
( "'- I I
v' II I
I .. 0-
m>- I
' ","" I:
'1 <i:-- 1
! 0
"1 '" > ,.
~
H.P. 1126.00
100 'IR FllY. 831.97
pOND BllTTCY FllY. 1119.00
~
L
~
:J
\ I\,.- '-fD I
~~ ~: . I
~~~.
0.1~ f'o- i-
~ ___ 1:5 1.1';;---
- _ 10"1lllf'.1....
'" r----
~
1;1II; ffl ce' E 6,.)4'
~........ DUK[ R~lI~I~TNER5HlP
Aw~ ~1lIQl} 7225 WOOO\.J\ND DR
_Zl II" IV INDLANAPOllS, IN 46278
-lI!l"_OUIB
. .~ '.' ".-. 'p '7'
"
&...~
.",.~
D1L1'GI'
tr_lIlL<<1i1
-------
------
..,
0.111 AlR!S
...
------
.Lw. ~
..-.-
o-a
0.1>>4 At:REII
-------
--------
-------
r::==
~
-------
-------
-------
z"
~ ~ i--.
,~ - L~ }
V-
'" 1.1' IU /
Ill" IIillP 4) 1.s~
:::01 I
18".. ~ ~
Te 8.3351 ,-,
INV N 8277.3 ~~.J
INV W 827.97
"-
;:
'"
0:
w .,
:;:~~
~o~
85~
1-0 .
-j'"
::l; -
- -'
-' 0
,..",~
~~~
;:;)...0
'" ~
w
'"
::>
o
a
~
.
g
in
"
"
u
u
u
(j
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
IU
IU
IU
IU
IU
\u
iu
IU
:u
I
iu
Project:
Location:
Prepared by:
Date:
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Total:
IL~JI_
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Granite City - Parkwood West
Carmel, I N
gsb
3/25/2008
Area or %
0.11
0.06
o
T ata I: t!:mm."i.~twl@!;~tl7~r;i!.1
~,"D;'~'""."sc-,,,,,,-,,,,'iiWfwa.;
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
Area or %
0.149
0.0195
o
Area or %
0.21
0.03
o
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
1,.I"."",y.r~i'O'8'5"f'RI
W,~,j"!l'9X~;IL~~,.~~~~t;H
U C II 01'''''''''1])''0'-4'< .,,~o~11
S e ..t...,....",'....,,";.'.....',....... ..,.",~.:!fij
. "'H"-:;~;i-J.,.,' ..,;i;i-..i;;'":ji'ii.';'t'i!
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
Use C. 11!'~",!1r;Z8~t~:11
.. ~; }h~_,)!.'"t':"~);.,.,ir.~". ..{t:::i:!~'.'b'
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
UseC:
u
u
U
u
u
(j
u
u
u
o
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Area or %
0.19
0.0138
o
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
Use C:
Area or %
0.0874
0.011
0.21
Total: Il.@x$Q,~~til'
-
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Total:
Area Or %
0.16
0.03
o
Area or %
0.13
0.0034
o
U C Ilf'tIJ'f'iS"6 "~~II
'se : :!li\\31'i0~..,~31i
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
1""'0'''.1'.11:''.1'5 ... 'I
",tI1'\ ;, ,~~~ 1:a.t~ ,i!;;j;~:
.'[11,.1, N'.. .",~.iij;, ,~;~ ~~~,,-.--k..,~
Use c: l~i~!~lQ~4.€?ii~JI
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
Us e C: II~,', !.5i~@gSBt:'l;}~],ill
,;.,";-'.~';'.',".'".' o. ",,,.,.,~;<,,H".'<'+-.
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
o
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
U
lJ
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Area or % C
006 0.85
0.04 0.25
o 0.9
Total:
Use C:
Area or % C
Pavement 0.0465 0.85
Grass 0.0346 0.25
Rooftop 0 0.9
Total:
Use c:
Area or % C
Pavement 0.04 0.85
Grass 0.0017 025
Rooftop 0 0.9
T ota I: Ir~~~[;ilitli!~~1f{~:m1 15:r~l1@:3j:if~~j'l
Use C:
Area or % C
0.06 0.85
o 0.25
o 0.9
Pavement
Grass
Roafto
Total:
Use C:
LJ
U
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
()
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
u
Area or % C
Pavement 0.06 0.85
Grass 0 0.25
Rooftop 0 0.9
Total:
Pavement
Grass
Roofto
Area or %
o
0.1043
o
I .... ....... ..............1
Total: 1~G\,!IG!fym!D,t1~~~
"""'.--:.~c""'~'~.
~mEtfiShlj~qNc,Rilim. '."'""@ik . .t'..,..
!l_~"" ,......:'.'..;.,",'.,;
Pavement
Grass
Rooftop
Area or %
0.61
0.17
0.12
Total:
Il!\c:KQr!I!?:tl!&1
Use C: Il1ll~:l~Qf~:$J:';~!l11
C
0.85
0.25
09
Use C:
C
0.85
0.25
0.9
1'i1'O~(21)@,iZ5:il
,\...............ML.....
U C r.'....0..'l.~. --.,
se . '-i,!4'{;~::11 if"",;' ~;~,?~!;,\N
. ;,';;i-;~'i!,,,!}:L.iol;:.j~,A;~;~ffi,2','
Area or % C
Pavement 0.54 0.85
Grass 0.17 0.25
Rooftop 007 0.9
Total:
J......"O.'5'6""Sfi..'''1
l}:~;,L~".,.:,,:f:!.,~~
Use C. lii;;n;"""'''e72'' '0)''',"0'1
. i~=iik9:~"ik'_,,_:ftP$jffJ
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Storm Sewer Tabulation
Page 1
Station Len Orng Area Rnoff Area x C Te Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd ( Rim Elev Line 10
eoeff (I) flow full
Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope On Up On Up On Up
Line
(ft) lac) (ac) (C) (min) (min) (in/hr) (efs) (ds) (ft/s) (in) (%) (ft) 1ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 End 26.263 0.19 1.31 0.75 0.14 102 5.0 8.0 6.0 6.08 11.75 5.84 15 331 829.70 830.57 830.69 83156 831.00 834.57 51-52
2 1 51.280 0.20 1.12 0.81 0.15 0.87 5.0 7.8 6.0 525 10.00 5.54 15 2AO 830.67 831.90 831.56 83282 834.57 837.82 52-53
3 2 58.713 0.06 0.92 0.85 0.05 0.71 5.0 7.6 6.1 4.33 430 3.99 15 0.44 832.00 832.26 833.03 833.29 837.82 836.06 53-54
4 3 79.490 0.31 0.86 0.86 0.27 0.66 5.0 7.2 6.2 4.10 4.10 3.34 15 0.40 832.36 832.68 833.67 83399 836.06 837.34 54-55
5 4 00.01! 0.17 0.55 0.78 013 039 5.0 6.5 6.5 2.53 408 2.21 15 DAD 832.78 833.18 834.D7 834.21 837.34 837.73 55-56
6 5 00.29" 0.17 0.38 0.64 0.11 026 5.0 5.8 6.7 1.74 2.25 2.35 12 0.40 833.28 833.68 834.30 834.51 837.73 838.00 56-57
7 6 95500 0.21 0.21 0.72 0.15 0.15 5.0 5.0 7.0 1.06 2.25 1.89 12 0.40 833.78 834.16 834.63 834.73 838.00 837.93 57 -58
Project File: Revised West Storm.8lm Number of lines: 7 Run Dale: 03-19-2008
NOTES: Intensity = 56.97 I (Inlet time + 9.00) ^ 080: Return period = 10 Yrs. c = cir e = ellip b = box
Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension v6 DS2
c: C C C C C C c' C. C CI C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C c' c' c c c c c C" c c' c c c. C c:
Storm' Sewer Tabulation
Page 1
Station Len Orng Area Rnoff Area x C Te Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd I Rim Elev Line 10
coeH (I) flow full
Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope On Up On Up On Up
Line
(ft) (ac) (ac) (C) (minI (min) (i n/hr) (cfs) (efs) (ftIs) (in) (%J (ft) 1ft) (ft) 1ft) (ft) (ft)
1 End 26.263 0.19 1.31 0.76 0.14 102 5.0 8.0 6.0 11.75 11.75 9.65 15 3.31 829.70 830.57 830.91 831.78 831.00 834.57 51-52
2 1 51280 0.20 1.12 0.81 0.16 0.87 5.0 7.8 6.0 10.00 10.00 848 15 2.40 830.67 831.90 831.78 833.09 834.57 837.82 52-53
3 2 58.713 0.06 0.92 0.85 0.05 0.71 5.0 7.6 6.1 4.30 4.30 3.84 15 0.44 832.00 832.26 833 09 833.32 837.82 836.06 53-54
4 3 79.490 0.31 086 0.86 0.27 0.66 5.0 7.2 6.2 4.10 4.10 3.34 15 0.40 832.36 832.68 833.67 833.99 836.06 837.34 54-55
5 4 ~00.01E 0.17 0.55 0.78 0.13 0.39 5.0 6.5 65 4.08 4.08 3.33 15 0.40 832.78 833.18 834.08 834.42 837.34 837.73 55-56
6 5 n0029l 0.17 038 0.64 0.11 0.26 5.0 5.8 6.7 2.25 2.25 2.86 12 0.40 833.28 833.68 834.61 835.01 837.73 838.00 56-57
7 6 95.500 0.21 0.21 0.72 0.15 0.15 5.0 5.0 7.0 2.25 2.25 2.86 12 0.40 833.78 834.16 835.16 83554 838.00 837.93 57-58
t It\ {) e..'L ~ 'i \.; ~ \-\ '\., Cj 1\"- ~ ~-e.. ~\~'\U
ft\ \ 1- \D~ ~e4. iV\ L . S - \0 {\ s
Project File: Revised West Storm.stm Number of lines: 7 Run Date: 03-25-2008
NOTES Intensity = 56.97 I (Inlet time + 9.00) ^ 0.80; Return period = 10 Yrs. : Total flows limited to full flow capacities. : c:: elr e:: ellip b:: box
Hydraflow Siorm Sewers Extension v6052
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCOCCCCCCCCC
Storm Sewer Tabulation
Page 1
Station Len Orng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd I Rim Elev Line 10
coeff (I) flow full
Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst . Size Slope On Up On Up On Up
Line
(ft) (ae) (ac) (C) {minI (min) (in/hr) (ds) (ds) (fils) (in) (%) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft)
1 End 75000 0.10 2.54 0.25 0.03 1.83 5.0 6.0 6.6 12.06 12.89 7.32 18 151 828.00 829,13 829.32 830,45 83000 837.50 83-84
2 1 13000 0.24 2.44 0.78 0.19 1,80 5.0 60 6.6 11.92 13.03 7.50 18 1.54 829.23 829.43 830.45 830,75 837.50 837.50 84-85
3 2 17.00C 0.10 220 0.61 0.06 1.61 5.0 5.7 6.7 10.85 12.88 6.50 18 1,50 829.53 83129 831.15 832.55 837.50 838.02 85-108
4 3 5700e 0.08 0,90 0.59 0.05 0.65 5.0 5.1 6.9 4.49 6.46 4.42 15 1.00 831.39 832,96 832.55 833.81 838.02 840.75 108-86
5 4 30000 0.82 0,82 0.73 0.60 0.60 5.0 5.0 7.0 4.18 6.46 5.17 15 100 833.06 833,36 833.81 834,18 84075 841.41 B6-87
6 3 30,000 0.96 0.96 0.75 072 0.72 5.0 5.0 7.0 5.03 6.46 4.78 15 1.00 B31.39 831,69 832.55 832.59 838.02 838.06 108-107
7 3 50.000 0.24 0,24 0.7B 019 0.19 5.0 5.0 7.0 1.31 2.52 323 12 0.50 B34.00 834,25 834.51 834,76 838.02 838.30 108-102
-
Project File: Revised East Storm.stm Number of lines: 7 Run Date: 03-19-2008
NOTES: Intensity = 56.97 I (Inlet time + 9.00) ^ 0.80; Return period = 10 Yrs. c = cir e = ellip b = box
Hydraflow Storm Sewers Extension v6052
CCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCCC
Storm Sewer Tabulation
Page 1
Station Len Drng Area Rnoff Area x C Tc Rain Total Cap Vel Pipe Invert Elev HGL Elev Grnd I Rim Elev Line 10
coeff (I) flow full
Line To Incr Total Incr Total Inlet Syst Size Slope On Up On Up On Up
Line
(ftl (ac) (ac) (e) (min) (minI (in/hr) (cfs) (cfs) (ftls) (in) (%1 (ft) (ft) (ft) 1ft) (ft) (ftl
1 End 75.000 0.10 0.00 0.25 0.03 000 5.0 0.0 00 12.89 12.89 769 18 1.51 828.00 829.13 829.35 830.48 830.00 837.50 83-84
2 1 13.000 0.24 0.00 0.78 0.19 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 1303 1303 7.91 18 1.54 829.23 829.43 830.48 830.84 837.50 837.50 84-85
3 2 117.00< 0.10 0.00 0.61 0.06 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 12.88 12.88 7.29 18 1.50 82953 831.29 831.29 833.05 837.50 838.02 85-108
4 3 157.00C 0.08 0.00 0.59 0.05 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 6.46 6.46 526 15 1.00 831 .39 832.96 834.29 835.86 838.02 840.75 108-86
5 4 30.000 0.82 0.00 0.73 0.60 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 6.46 6.46 5.26 15 1.00 833.06 833.36 836.50 836.80 840.75 841.41 86-87
6 3 30.000 0.96 0.00 0.75 0.72 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 6.46 6.46 5.26 15 1.00 831.39 831.69 834.29 834.59 838.02 83806 108-107
7 3 50.000 0.24 0.00 0.78 0.19 0.00 5.0 0.0 0.0 2.52 2.52 3.66 12 0.50 834.00 834.25 834.82 835.07 838.02 838.30 108-102
" Ve () c.. I, ., 'r\: \~ "'~ ! \)\\ . ~~" ~~~ -0~~
1. P _\ (j)-Q bS
t\
Project File: Revised East Storm.stm Number of lines: 7 Run Date: 03-25-2008
NOTES: Intensity = 56.97 I (Inlet time + 9.00) ^ 0.80; Return period = 10 Yrs. ; Total flows limited to full flow capacities. ; c = cir e = ellip b '" box
Hydraflow Storm Sewsrs htenslon v6052
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
(j '-.
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
(J
(J
u
u
u
u
u
u.
u ......
U
U
u
u
U
(j
u
U'
u
u
u
u
...,e;6 tlAH <.:>,v-un,.l-P...eS
10
cj
en
I
~2
<0(
0:::.
.c)
u..
o
"l(-
W
0:::
.<
-<(4
w
0:::
<.
z
~3
o
....:
u..
9
8
Discharge
7
6
5
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
1
.9
.8
.7
.6
vs Depth On
Grate
,
.0'
.
u
w
V)
~
W
0..
30
.
t-
u...
20'
.
:>>
u
2
R-~z8cD -IV
1\
@ 1981 Neenah Foundry Company
1
" .
10
9
8
7
6
5~
u..
4 I
w
3.....
..i(
0:::
~
20:::
w
>
o
e
:I:
I-
a..
lw
.9 0
.8 ~
'71-
.. -<
.6 .~
~
A
03
@
(j
u
u
)
U
LJ
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
U
()
U
U
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
(j
U Bfo
u
u 81
U
U
U
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
U
U
U
U
o
~'< Oti-\l ('e.
5~
s~
b7
S~
BS
\ OB
lol
\. 02
S2-
0, \ '\. )r. 0 ~ l {O}. 7 ::- I, 0 L c -f 'S
bS
0.2.0 )( o. B 1 x / = [, l3 ct s
S'f
o. 0 ~ x o. <db 'x:J !::= 0..5 G:, (~S
o.la)< 0.'65)< (~ o. ~o c.ts
o ~ II X o. (n)(. '7 "::" o. 9 3 C+S
o~ ll;x. 0, ~ 'I- )( '7 ::: 0,7 (0 cf-s
G.l.L )<. o.l2 Xl ~ I. (j ~ cIs
C\2-f XJ 0_/81- 7 -== \ I~ l cis
o. \0 x O.lo~ )( 7 ~ 0,43 c+~
o.aB)(, o. S9 y:( ~ Ol~~ c-Cs
o,O;Lf ~Q.BS~I::: 0,'24 C+-S
o. 0 ~ )(. 0 ~ 95 ><. I ~ 0 ~ 3 <..0 ~+ s
O.2.tt )( o.[~)'. 7 -=- L~\ c+s
~ ~ ~Z.B~ - g V w: \l ~~dle Olow -toy- 4..ll
l V\.l t -\- ~ . ~ - 32 g 7 - l d V ; S \J &ol d.u ~ 1- a
s-\- n <- -wn {'j filL C (. ~:"e. .,; ~ 2e ~ 10., J e.pW "- vJ...
o.\~ ~vd..\~ ~e +lows ~a ~re. ~~edtd,
lJ ~ l\
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
o
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
()
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
DRAINAGE BASIN MAPS
Woolpert, Inc.
March 2008
Granite City - Carmel, IN
Parkwood West- Outlot #1