Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact [ CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V ~ Variance Re!!ardin!! Number of Permitted Tenant Si!!ns Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo!!)' and their successors, assi!!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval ofthis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value ofthe area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28th day of _April, 2008. BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, Cmmel/Clay Board 0 ! CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No, Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Rel!ardinl! Number of Permitted Tenant Signs Petitioner; Shideler Dermatology and their successors, assil!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS VARIANCE I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare ofthe community because: The proposed additional signage would be pel1nitted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements, Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building, it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice ot ili-1;Jatients. 2. 'fhe lIse and value oftlle area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above. the !.;Imposed additional signage would be pel111itted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building, it requires these additional signs to Qfovide adequate notice to its patients. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above, the applicant would be prevented from providinq adequate notice of the 3 individual and specialized services it offers to its Qatients. Absent approval of the variance. the applicant will not have signage directinq clients to the correct offices. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof < B resident, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRETAR Y, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals po f CARMELlCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIAN A BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Regarding Number of Permitted Tenant Si1!;ns Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolol?:V and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT 81' ANDARDS V ARTANCE I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance to the property will resu It in practical difficulties in the use of the propeliy because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of thjs Board whjch are incorporated herein by reference and made a pa11 hereof Adopted this _28th day of _April, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals B~Member, " ,/I-... /Jv..A-- (name) SECRET AR Y, Cam1el/Clay Board 0 ;.. CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance RCl!:ardinl!: Number of Permitted Tenant SilWS Petitioner: Sh ideler Dermatolol!:v and their successors, assil!:l1S and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage would be permitted if thev were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices v.'ithin the building, it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice at its patients. 2. The use and value ofthe area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above, the proposed additional sign age would be permitted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building, it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice to its patients. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above, the applicant would be prevented from providing adequate notice of the 3 individual and specialized services it offers to its patients. Absent approval of the variance, the applicant will not have signage direclinq clients to the correct offices. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Cam1ellCIay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of tIus Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28th day of _April, 2008. Appeals BZA President, Carme BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Rel!ardin2: Number of Permitted Tenant Si2:ns Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo2:V and their successors, assi{!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare ofthe community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the telms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the propelty because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 28th day of April, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, ~~>-~ ~ pr (name) SECRETARY, Cannel/Clay Board 0 f CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Rel!ardinj! Number of Permitted Tenant Sil!ns Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolol!V and their successors, assil!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantial1y adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of tile terms oftlle Zoning Ordinance to the property wiII result in practical difticulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28th day of _April, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, .. . CARMELlCI...A Y BOARD OF ZONINC APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Re2ardin2 Number of Permitted Tenant Si2ns Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo2V and their successors, assil!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the pubLic health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage would be pel1l1itted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building, it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice ot its patients. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above. the proposed additional signage would be pennitted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building. it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice to its patients. 3, The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the propeliy will result in practical difticulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above. the applicant would be prevented from providina adequate notice of the 3 individual and specialized services it offers to its patients. Absent approval of the variance. the applicant will not have sionaae directing clients to the correct offices. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 281h day of _April, 2008. BZA Member, SECRET ARY, -,. CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020035 V - Variance Regardin2: Sil!ns Not Facin2: Right of Way Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo2:v and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval ofthis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general \velfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be aftected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the llse of the properLy because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020035 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. this ~ 28th day of April, 2008. " BZA Member, (name) SECRET AR Y, Cannel/Clay Board 0 CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020035 V - Variance Regardin2 Si!:!Ils Not Facin{! Rie:ht of Way Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolol?:V and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage will be visible from the adiacent right of way. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the propelty included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above, the proposed additional signagc will be visible from the adiacent right of way. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the propClty will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above. the buildinq would lose visibility on West Carmel Drive and 122nd Street and this additional signage will allow the Applicant to provide notice of its location to its various patients. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020035V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. <' resident, Carmel/C ay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020035 V - Variance Rel!ardin~ Si~ns Not Facio!!: Rieht of Way Petitioner: Shideler Dermatoloev aod their successors, assi!!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT ~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of tile community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020035 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof Adopted this _28th day of April,2008. BZA President, Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, y-e....--=..r~ ~ CarmcVClay Board 0 (name) SECRETARY, O~u:too:W 6 ~o()-{)03( BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variance Re!!ardiIH!: Number ofPermiUed Tenant Si2:flS CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo2:V and their successors, assi2:ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS V ARJANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be illj urious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 28th day of April, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, --;.-~~ ~ (name) /" ---- --- ,. ~7CJay Board 0 SECRETARY, CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS O'fti@a1S CARMEL, INDIANA o ro~a;i$'6' Docket No. Docket No. 08020029 V - Variancc RCl!ardinl! Number of Permitted Tcnant Sil!l1s Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolof?:V and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the pubLic health, safety, morals and generaL welfare ofthe community because: The proposed additional signage would be permitted if they were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within tbe building, it requires these additional signs to provide adequate notice ot its patients. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance wi 11 not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above, the proposed additional signage would be permitted if thev were for individual tenants and are within the allowable size requirements. Because the applicant has 3 separate offices within the building, it requires these additional signs to orovide ade!1uate notice to its oatients. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above. the applicant would be prevented from providing adequate notice of the 3 individual and specialized services it offers to its patients. Absent approval of the variance, the applicant will not have siQnage directina clients to the correct offices. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020029V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 28th day of Aplil, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZAMember, ~ ~~ (name) /~-'" SECRETARY~ Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals .. . CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Re!!:arding Number of Signs Facio!?: Ril!ht ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Derrnatolol!:v and their successors, assi!!:ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT-DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare ofthe community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the propelty included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms ofthe Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of tbe Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. April, 2008. ,( President, CanneVClay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board 0 CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Regarding Number of Silws Fadm! Rizht ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Dermatology and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDSVARTANCE 1. The approval ofthis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibility for the various services that Shideler Dennato]ogy provides. as well as building visibility without being visually obtrusive. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As slated above, the proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibility for the various services that Shideler Dermatology provides, as well as building visibility without being visually obtrusive. 3. The strict application ufthe tenns of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above, the Applicant would have insufficient signage to advertise its services and location to its various oatients. which will make it harder for Datients to identify and locate this buildinQ. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28th day of_A ril,2008. ~ BZ resident, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRET AR Y, Camlel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals+ CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Rel!arding Number of Sil!m PacinI! Ril!ht of Way Petitioner: ShilJeler Dermatolol!V and their successors. assil!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE I. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare ofthe community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the tenns of the Zoning Ordinance to the propeliy will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this_28lh day of_April, 2008. BZA President, Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, ~~ ............. CamlellClay Board 0 (name) SECRETARY, CARMELlCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Rel!ardinl! Number of Sit?:ns Facing Ril!ht of Way Petitioner: Shideler DermatoID!!" and their successors. assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application ofthe tenus of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use ofthe property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 28th day of April, 2008. BZA President, Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals BZA Member, t'2~~J (name) . Carmel/Clay Board 0 SECRETARY, CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Regarding Number of Si2ns Facinl! Right ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Dermatologv and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibility for the various services that Shideler Dennatology provides. as well as building visibility without being visually obtrusive. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above. the proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibility for the various services that Shideler Dermatology provides. as well as building visibility without being visuallv obtrusive. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the propelty because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above. the Applicant would have insufficient siqnage to advertise its services and location to its various patients. which will make it harder for patients to identifv and locate this building. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28th day of _April, 2008. I SECRETARY, Carmel/Glay Board of Zoning Appeals+ BZA President, CarmellCI BZA Member, CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Re2:ardin2: Number of Si!!ns Facin!! Ril!:ht of Way Petitioner: Shideler Dermatolo!!y and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT ~ DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the propeliy included in the variance will not be affected ill a substantially adverse manner because: 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036 V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28lh day of April, 2008. BZA President, Carmel/Cia SECRET AR Y, BZA Member, Cmmel/Clay Board 0 CARMELlCLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020036 V - Variance Re{!arding Number of Signs Facing Ri!!ht ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Dermatologv and their successors. assi{!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibility for the various services that Shideler Dennatology provides. as well as building visibility without being visually obtrusive. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above. the proposed additional signage will increase tenant visibilitv for the various services that Shideler Dermatology provides. as well as building visibility without being visna]]\' obtrusive. 3. The strict application of the ten11S of the Zoning Ordinance to the propeliy will result in practical difficulties in the use of the propelty because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above, the Applicant would have insufficient siqnage to advertise its services and location to its various patients which will make it harder for patients to identify and locate this buildinq. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020036V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this ~28th day of~April, 2008. Appeals BZA Member, (name) SECRETARY, Cannel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals+ CARMEL/CLA Y BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA BALLOT SHEET Docket No. Docl<et Nu. 08020035 V - Variance Regarding Sil.ms Not Facinl! Ril!ht ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Dermatulogy and their successors, assigns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCE 1. The approval ofthis variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare oftbe community because: 2. The llse and value of the area adjacentto the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because": 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the .use of the propelty because: DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020035 V is granted, granted su~ject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this _28tl1 day of _April, 2008. (name) BZA Member, SECRETARY, Carmel/Clay Board 0 CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No. Docket No. 08020035 V - Variance Rel!arding Signs Not Facil1l:! Ril!ht ofWav Petitioner: Shideler Dermatologv and their successors, assil!ns and heirs FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT ST ANDARDS VARIANCE L The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: The proposed additional signage will be visible from the adiacent right of way. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in tbe variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: As stated above, the proposed additional signage will be visible from the adiacent rif!ht of way. 3. The strict application ofthe terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the propeliy because: In addition to the same rational set forth in Responses Numbered One (1) and Two (2) above. the building would lose visibilitv on West Carmel Drive and 122nd Street and this additional siQnage will allow the Applicant to provide notice of its location to its various patients. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals that Variance Docket No. 08020035V is granted, granted subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this Board which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 28th day of _April,' 2008. (name) BZA Member, SECRET ARY, Carmel/Clay Board of Zoning Appeals