Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCRC-05-14-08CRC'Meeting,: M al 1'4; ,2008 cl 5p 1 CA:RMEI.,.REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION"Meeting; Wednesday, May l4; 2008 ,President Ron:Carter called flip meeting to.ordei at:8;35 nn. Commission menrbefs;Rick Sharp;-JeffWorrell acid Bill Hammerweie-present, constituiing?a,quormn. Also,present were-'Mayor Brainard, Kail'Haas; Les Oldsi Sherry Mielk"e and Andrea Stumpf: Otliers'rprescriC From,,gSO Arehitects:,.Brandon Bogair_ From Slied Sexton:. Mike"Anderson Contractors and members of th' pbblio or 'press. t5ee'sign-in.shcof for detail:] Matt Wortliley,.Brandon Bouman, Francesca Jarosz,andliohard Osborn, Acceptance of Alternates from Bid Package Three Mr:,Olds•stated-the Construclion.Manager.has evaiuatedLthe,series of'altemates for, bid packages 'l 4,'and'outlined Miici alternates°are-extremely'important-:fortheadng-tens durability of the facility. Two alternateswerc identified as important to long=tenn durability,: scheduling and sequencing of the project Limestone Field and Cast Stone at Upper..Drum. The staff requested the CRC=approve. adding the two.alternates to the project. Cnnentlythc"PAC construction schedule is,on_time,"and;wiil redlain-so with,the approval oftlie two alternates at,thi's time. lt,`,istnct likely f iatthc contractor will;liaye additional costs v_nce_the kork`heginsz. The.CR"C is,protected"bytheacontract?, and,there is?no indication if,a decision:is made.at---this time, therc?woul'd°be any forth cumkigirequests. Tliere.is concern regarding"additional costs, delayed.scheduling and,sigriifi cant color differences in the limestone if the;'d cision_regarding 'the altemafes isn't inade, .5y April 2009.4he building wilP,be `'built in'' meaning the temporary structural openings, masonry and;inost of therobfing;wil! be.in tilacet -Liinestone is sclieddled to?be delivered November 1,;2008 as part,of the "build in" process: The money for the`two`alteinates is corn33g_ rom the "private"fundraising eff6rts. The costs are beyoud,the:budget`at the current time but can temporarily 6e"paid forthro , contingencyfunds or.out'ofgeneral CRC TIF funds. Previouslythe CRC<approvcd`to; payfor the parking and iaydownYshop.space for PAC constructiori,.resulting'in'$700 000 heinginade available hvthe?budgct wliich can be used, toward tiie•alternaies. Mr.,Sharp moyed,to,accept the bid of BybeehSfone Company/Hagernlan Construction in the amounrof<$753,650 for Bid packngc 3,:Alternate 1, for the Limestone Field. Seconded by Mr. Hammer and unanimously approved. Mr.,Sharp'rnoved to approve Hageiiman Construction's bid'in thvamountlof s]55;T30,for Alternate 3„Ca_s,t Stone;at ttie Upper Drum: Scconded`by Mr. Hammer. The motibri, ,+as approved13-1. °Votes?approving,rirotion::Roii Carter, Bill binmer,'Jeff Worrell. Votes against moiiori Ride'..Sliarp, .CRC Meeting;,May`14, 2006 Mn Haas reported that two bids were-received: K:eystone.Construction and Barrett,& Stokely: The bid'front Keystone Construction"was noCreceived before the deadline, and needs to'be,rejected: fil3ebid- from,Banrett & Stokely does not comply witli.tlie,RF.P and needs•.tobe rejected. Negotiations•cah now';begiri:with either or botlvbidders,,or?anyfhird party: Within •30 days,;a project agreemenbcan Fe•signed with any developer. Mi Hammer moved to:r_eject both bids for-Parcel 47t1,.B',&,C in response to the RFP. Seconded by. Mr. Worrell and unanimously appiovcd. OId: Business None at, this time. New Business None.0this firne:, Adiournmeut Mr,-Hamriier-i?ovedlhemeeting.be-adjourned. Seconded'byMr. Worrell. Tlieaneeting was;adjourned st8':52,a.m.,