HomeMy WebLinkAboutDepartment Report 04-22-246 of 11
CARMEL BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS HEARING OFFICER
DEPARTMENT REPORT
MONDAY, APRIL 22, 2024
(V) Zisk Fence Height Variance.
The applicant seeks the following development standards variance approval:
5. Docket No. PZ-2024-00050 V UDO Section 5.09 (Fence and Wall Standards)
Maximum 6' tall fence along side/rear property line allowed, 8' requested. (Also, minimum 25%
visibility required; 0% visibility requested.)
The site is located at 837 Bridle Ct. (Hunter’s Creek Village, Lot 45.) It is zoned R1/Residence. Filed by
Stephen & Abigail Zisk, owners.
General Info:
• The site currently has a 6-ft tall fence in the back yard, and the owner seeks to replace it.
• The Petitioner seeks approval for an 8-ft tall fence in the backyard, when only 6-ft is allowed.
• The site is located in Hunter’s Creek Village Subdivision; and there is no HOA (Homeowners Association)
involved.
• Surrounding this site are single family residential homes.
• Pending fence permit is F-2024-00082.
• Please see the Petitioner’s info packet for more detail on the variance request.
Variance Requested:
Fence Height -
• The UDO allows for a maximum 6-ft tall fence along the side/rear property lines, and an 8-ft tall fence is
requested. (This is a 2-ft variance, or a 33% change.)
• There is a slight slope on the land, so the house sits a little higher in elevation than the back yard area and
rear property line areas. The lot contains some slope, with an 868-ft elevation along the front property line,
sloping down to 864-ft elevation at the back corner. The house is situated on an 869-ft elevation.
• The proposed fence will be an 8-ft tall wooden privacy fence.
Remaining Review Comments:
• The Petitioner addressed all planning/zoning review comments.
Final Comments:
• Due to the grade change in the back yard, the Planning Dept. supports the variance request.
Findings of Fact:
• Please refer to the Petitioner’s Findings of Facts included in their BZA Info Packet.
Recommendation:
• The Dept. of Community Services (DOCS) recommends positive consideration of this variance request, and
with adoption of the Findings of Fact submitted by the Petitioner.