Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings of Fact - Lot Cover 06.16.25EXHIBIT ā€œEā€ Proposed Findings of Fact for Development Standards Variance Requests CARMEL ADVISORY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS CARMEL, INDIANA Docket No.: __________________ Applicant: SCI Carmel, LLC, and its successors and assigns in interest Property: 695 1st Avenue SE, Carmel, IN 46032 Requests: UDO Section 2.14 Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% permitted; 75% requested FINDINGS OF FACT - DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS VARIANCES 1. The approval of this variance will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because: SCI believes approval of the above described Variances will not be injurious to the public health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community because of the varied and different uses and zoning classifications that surround the Real Estate, as the request for a single multi -family building with a maximum of three (3) units and associated development standards variances would not be inconsistent or incompatible with the surrounding area. 2. The use and value of the area adjacent to the property included in the variance will not be affected in a substantially adverse manner because: For the same reasons stated in #1 above, SCI also believes approval of the Variances will not have a substantially adverse impact on the use and value of properties in the area adjacent to the Real Estate. 3. The strict application of the terms of the Zoning Ordinance to the property will result in practical difficulties in the use of the property because: Strict application of the terms of the UDO as it relates to the requested Variances will present practical difficulties in the use of the property because the Real Estate is a long narrow parcel that presents challenges and difficulties in complying with the lot coverage standards of the UDO. In order to position the home, drive aisle and parking areas on the Real Estate, additional parcel coverage is required. Further, whether the Real Estate were redeveloped for this requested use (single multi-family building with 3 units and parking area) or another type of residential use, it seems highly likely a similar lot coverage variance would be necessary due to the configuration, smaller size and narrow shape of the Real Estate. Additionally, the proposed multi-family home is well-designed and architecturally appealing and SCI believes it will be an asset to this area and will be compatible with the surrounding uses and area. DECISION IT IS THEREFORE the decision of the Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals that Development Standards Variances identified by Docket Nos. PZ-_________V; is granted, subject to any conditions stated in the minutes of this meeting, which are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof. Adopted this 25th day of August, 2025. ____________________________________________________ CHAIRPERSON, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals ________________________________________ SECRETARY, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals Conditions of the Board are listed on the back. (Petitioner or his representative to sign) CARMEL/CLAY BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS BALLOT SHEET for FINDINGS OF FACT – VARIANCE Docket No.: __________________ Applicant: SCI Carmel, LLC, and its successors and assigns in interest Property: 695 1st Avenue SE, Carmel, IN 46032 Requests: UDO Section 2.14 Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% permitted; 75% requested 1. _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ 2. _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ 3. _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ DATED THIS 25th DAY OF AUGUST , 2025. ____________________________________________________ Board Member, Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals ________________________________________